Next Article in Journal
Development of an Alcohol Dilution–Lyophilization Method for the Preparation of mRNA-LNPs with Improved Storage Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Development of pH-Responsive Hyaluronic Acid-Conjugated Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles for Chemo-/CO-Gas Dual Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design of Tailor-Made Biopolymer-Based Capsules for Biological Application by Combining Porous Particles and Polysaccharide Assembly
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 15
Issue 7
10.3390/pharmaceutics15071820
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Zein-Based Nanocarriers for Precise Cancer Therapy

by
Wenquan Huang
1,†,
Fei Yao
1,†,
Shuangyan Tian
1,
Mohao Liu
1,
Guijin Liu
2,* and
Yanbin Jiang
3,*
1
College of Medicine and Health Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
2
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hainan University, Haikou 570100, China
3
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(7), 1820; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071820
Submission received: 31 May 2023 / Revised: 21 June 2023 / Accepted: 23 June 2023 / Published: 26 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Major Contribution of Natural Polymers for Biological Applications in the Last 10 Years: Toward Tailor-Made Biotechnologies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cancer has emerged as a leading cause of death worldwide. However, the pursuit of precise cancer therapy and high-efficiency delivery of antitumor drugs remains an enormous obstacle. The major challenge is the lack of a smart drug delivery system with the advantages of biodegradability, biocompatibility, stability, targeting and response release. Zein, a plant-based protein, possesses a unique self-assembly ability to encapsulate anticancer drugs directly or indirectly. Using zein as a nanotherapeutic pharmaceutic preparation can protect anticancer drugs from harsh environments, such as sunlight, stomach acid and pepsin. Moreover, the surface functionalization of zein is easily realized, which can endow it with targeting and stimulus-responsive release capacity. Hence, zein is an ideal nanocarrier for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs. Combined with our previous research experiences, we attempt to review the current state of the preparation of zein-based nanocarriers for anticancer drug delivery. The challenges, solutions and development trends of zein-based nanocarriers for precise cancer therapy are discussed. This review will provide a guideline for precise cancer therapy in the future.

1. Introduction

Cancer mortality and morbidity are increasing rapidly worldwide, posing a serious threat to human health [1]. Over the past few decades, researchers have developed many new cancer drugs, such as cisplatin, carboplatin, platinum oxalate, paclitaxel (PTX), gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib. However, most of these cancer drugs are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) due to their poor water solubility, low bioavailability and weak targeting ability, which lead to low efficacy and various toxic side effects [2,3,4]. For example, platinoid drugs have the characteristics of a broad spectrum and strong efficacy against cancer, but they often cause nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal reactions, ototoxicity, marrow toxicity, etc. [5,6]. Therefore, improving the efficacy and reducing the side effects are the keys to the development of anticancer drugs.
Recently, various advanced materials have provided new opportunities for the delivery of anticancer drugs [7,8,9]. Advanced materials such as micelles, liposomes, animal protein, plant protein, metal and non-metallic nanoparticles (NPs) have obvious advantages in improving drug stability, solubility, targeting ability and drug sustained release [9,10,11,12]. Based on these materials, researchers have designed a variety of advanced multifunctional drug delivery systems (DDSs), which provide tremendous advances in anticancer drug delivery [13,14]. However, traditional DDSs are confronted with two major problems with regard to precise delivery. On the one hand, DDSs inevitably cause immune stimulation or immunosuppressive effects. Traditional DDSs have failed to achieve the desired therapeutic effect in vivo due to multiple drug delivery obstacles such as immune system clearance, complex tumor microenvironment and plasma protein adsorption, leading to the shielding of targeted peptides [15,16,17]. On the other hand, the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect has been used in traditional DDSs to enhance solid tumor target ability [18]. Hassan et al. [19] reported that zein NPs modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG) had a longer half-life and higher drug retention rate (80.42 ± 1.16%), which ensured the drug could penetrate hepatocellular carcinoma by EPR effect. However, this effect has been questioned by researchers. Pozo et al. [20] reported that nanoparticles with a size bigger than 100–150 nm could not achieve tumors’ passive targeting by EPR effect. Nichols et al. [21] reported that EPR did not necessarily realize targeted aggregation and sometimes drug carriers did not exhibit a higher therapeutic effect compared with free drug systems in clinical trials. Additionally, Caro et al. [22] reported that the presence of the blood–brain tumor barrier prevents the EPR effect of metallic nanoparticles. Therefore, other methods should be developed. Although researchers have developed various active carriers over the past decades, there has been no breakthrough in targeting DDSs, and few nanotechnology-based drug preparations have been successfully marketed. Therefore, designing nanodrug carriers to realize efficient utilization of anticancer drugs has become an important goal for pharmaceutical researchers.
Zein is a plant-based protein with various advantages including low cytotoxicity, abundant sources, high drug binding capacity and biocompatibility [23,24]. The unique protein structure of zein provides the potential for a variety of ligand modifications to achieve the stability and specificity of zein-based DDSs [9,25]. The rationale behind using zein-based nanocarriers for cancer therapy is shown in Figure 1. After injection or oral administration, zein-based DDSs encapsulated with anticancer drugs enter the blood circulation. To avoid clearance by the immune cells, the DDS can be modified with PEG or cancer cell membrane, which exhibit a long circulation half-life [7,26]. To obtain the targeting ability, zein-based DDSs can be conjugated with the targeting polypeptide or tumor microenvironment response substances, which will increase the concentration of anticancer drugs in the tumor tissue [9,27]. Then, precise cancer therapy can be achieved. For oral administration, zein-based DDSs can protect unstable anticancer drugs from degradation by enzymes or strongly acidic environments; as such, they show a long residence time within the gastrointestinal tract [28].
Zein can be modified with NPs such as gold, metal–organic frameworks and mesoporous silica to broaden its applications [9,17,29]. However, currently commercially available zein is a mixture, and it is difficult to judge where zein molecules are modified. The preparation of zein to form DDSs is a complex self-assembly and co-assembly process. The strategy for drug loading is the key point in order to further apply zein in the delivery of anticancer drugs. In this review, the status of zein for anticancer drug delivery is summarized (Figure 2), which provides deeper insights into precise cancer therapy of zein-based carriers.

2. Preparation of Zein-Based Nanocarriers for Anticancer Drug Delivery

2.1. The Strategy for Drug Loading

The current strategies for the preparation of zein nano-DDS include physical cross-linking, evaporation-induced self-assembly, anti-solvent self-assembly, microfluidic technology, chemical synthesis of the prodrug and direct encapsulation. The different strategies for drug loading result in different particle nanostructures, encapsulation efficiency, drug loading, drug delivery behavior (rapid release or controlled release) and cell uptake. Hence, the different drug loading strategies result in different therapeutic effects.

2.1.1. Physical Cross-Linking

Physical interactions between polymer chains provide a platform for the encapsulation of various types of bioactive compounds [30]. As shown in Figure 3, hydrophobic zein is an ideal carrier for the loading of lipophilic anticancer drugs based on physical cross-linked methods (PCL), where anticancer drugs can interact with zein through hydrophobic, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces. When the solvent environment is changed, the co-assembly between zein and anticancer drugs occurs, and the drugs are encapsulated in the zein micelles by the physical interactions. Then, these micelles grow into zein-based DDSs. Seok et al. [31] used zein to encapsulate curcumin molecules by electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bonding, where hyaluronic acid (HA) acted as a stabilizer and targeting agent. The obtained HA–zein–curcumin nanogels could effectively inhibit cancer cell growth both in vitro and in vivo. Elzoghby et al. [32] developed shell-crosslinked zein nanocapsules for oral codelivery of exemestane and resveratrol. The obtained NPs possessed an enhanced cytotoxicity for MCF-7 and 4T1 breast cancer cells.

2.1.2. Evaporation-Induced Self-Assembly

Evaporation-induced self-assembly (EISA) is a technique used to facilitate the self-assembly of nanostructures that involves the use of binary (or tertiary) solvents [33]. The change of the solution polarity drives the self-assembly of zein into various structures, such as nano- and micro-rods, spheres and thin films. When the drug is added to the solution, it can be easily encapsulated in the particles (Figure 4) [34]. For example, curcumin was loaded and embedded in zein NPs during solvent evaporation induction in the study of Cai et al. [35]. Wang et al. [36] developed an EISA method to prepare mixed zein phosphatidylcholine hybrid NPs to prevent triple-negative breast cancer. The results showed that the composite NPs had a high encapsulation rate (96.75 ± 1.41%). In vitro and in vivo experiments showed that the prepared DDSs had selectively high cytotoxicity against cancer cells and low cytotoxicity against normal cells.

2.1.3. Anti-Solvent Self-Assembly

Antisolvent precipitation (ASP), also known as the liquid–liquid dispersion or phase separation method, is commonly used to prepare anticancer drug-loading zein NPs [37]. Usually, deionized water is used as the anti-solvent and an aqueous ethanol solution is used as the solvent for zein. By adjusting the mixing rate and zein concentration, the properties of anticancer drug-loading zein NPs (such as size, dissolution rate, drug sustain-release, encapsulation efficiency and drug loading capacity) can be optimized to harvest the optimum cancer treatment effect. For example, zein–alginate oligosaccharide complex NPs were successfully prepared to encapsulate anticancer drug (curcumin) by the antisolvent precipitation method, where uniform and stable NPs were prepared at a 2:1 ratio of zein to alginate oligosaccharide [38]. As shown in Figure 5, there are some derivative methods of ASP.
(1)
Ultrasonic dialysis process
The slow dialysis process is beneficial for the fine control of the change in solvent concentration; then, the size and morphology of zein-based NPs can be precisely controlled. In our preliminary work (Figure 5b), a built-in ultrasonic dialysis process (BUDP) was developed for the self-assembly of curcumin-loaded zein NPs with controllable particle size and narrow distribution [39]. Based on this method, Zhu et al. [29] prepared a zein–ZF-8 hybrid NP with pH-responsive drug delivery; Ye et al. [40] prepared pluronic-zein–curcumin DDSs, which showed an enhanced hydrophilicity and sustained-release behavior. It is worth noting that the high-energy ultrasonic probe was used to make a fast mixing of solution in BUDP. Therefore, a low temperature was needed to avoid the increase in crosslinking NPs.
(2)
Self-assembly in supercritical fluid
Supercritical fluid (SCF) is any substance whose temperature and pressure are above the critical point [41]. SCF provides high levels of supersaturation, which is difficult in traditional technology [42]. As shown in Figure 5c, the antisolvent self-assembly in SCF is usually carried out by injecting the mixture solution of zein and drug into SC-CO2 in a high-pressure vessel through a coaxial nozzle. For example, a cancer-preventive substance (luteolin) was loaded into zein microparticles with high entrapment efficiencies (up to 82%) by an SCF process [43]. An SCF process can be combined with other methods to obtain complicated particles. Our preliminary work fabricated 10-hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) nanocrystals by an SCF process. Then, we used these nanocrystals as templates or hydrophobic cores during the self-assembly process of zein molecules, resulting in the formation of HCPT nanocrystal-loaded zein microspheres [44]. Wang et al. [17] further modified this process to prepare an HCPT nano-drug delivery system, where folic acid and Au NPs were used to functionalize the DDS, leading to the target drug delivery and cell imaging.
(3)
Atomizing/antisolvent precipitation process
By combining spray drying with antisolvent precipitation technologies, Wu et al. [45] established an atomizing/antisolvent precipitation (AAP, Figure 5d) method to prepare zein/soy lecithin/carboxymethyl chitosan core–shell NPs. The obtained NPs could change the crystal morphology of docetaxel, increase the dissolution rate of docetaxel, and exhibit sustained release behavior. Zhang et al. [46] further prepared zein-based NPs using this method for loading resveratrol. The NPs had a high zeta potential (−47.7 ± 0.66 mV) and a high encapsulation efficiency (91.32 ± 4.01%).
(4)
Microfluidic technology
Recently, microfluidic technology has emerged as an effective means for the preparation of DDSs [47]. Different structure, constitution, morphology and size of the NPs can be obtained by control of microfluidic devices and chip geometries [48]. Figure 5e shows a preparation process of zein-based DDSs by microfluidic technology. In this process, a flow-focused microfluidics chip is used, and the self-assembly of zein is controlled by the flow rate, concentration and temperature of the zein solution. By using this millisecond solvent–antisolvent mixing technology, DDSs with high encapsulation efficiency (97.2 ± 0.6%) and loading capacity (11.1 ± 0.1%) were obtained [49]. Meewan et al. [50] prepared PEGylated zein-based NPs by a microfluidic method. The modified NPs showed enhanced stability and higher coumarin-6 uptake by melanoma cancer cells. Olenskyj et al. [51] fabricated zein NPs by microfluidics. It was found that increasing the total flow rate would result in small NPs and large PDI. In fact, microfluidics can be used not only for the synthesis of nano DDSs, but also for drug delivery and evaluation [52]. With the further development of microfluidics, it will become a potential force for clinically translatable nanotechnology in the future.

2.1.4. Chemical Synthesis of Prodrugs

The bioavailability of many anticancer drugs is very low due to their poor drug solubility and decomposition in the gastrointestinal tract [32,53]. The prodrugs approach is a powerful strategy to improve the physicochemical, biopharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic properties of parent drug molecules [54]. Using this strategy, the drug can change its distribution, bioavailability and side effects. For example, a new zein-based prodrug was synthesized by covalent coupling of zein and PTX through disulfide bonds [24]. Animal experiments showed that the original size of the tumor significantly reduced after three doses.

2.2. Type of Pharmaceutical Preparation

Zein-based DDSs for cancer therapy have been designed as various pharmaceutical preparations, including NPs, micelles, hydrogels and films, as summarized in Table 1.

2.2.1. Micelles

Zein is an amphipathic protein molecule that can be dissolved in an ethanol solution. The changes in the solvent polarity of solution lead to the rapid self-assembly process of zein, forming zein micelles with hydrophilic segments (shell) and hydrophobic segments (core). The hydrophobic core of zein micelles can load hydrophobic drugs with low solubility, while the hydrophilic shell can form a protective layer to protect drugs from harsh external environments and prolong the blood circulation time [63]. Therefore, zein-based micelles have shown great potential for cancer drug delivery. For example, Podaralla et al. [55] synthesized methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG) conjugated zein biodegradable micelles, and curcumin was encapsulated in this DDS. The cell uptake of curcumin-loaded mPEG–zein micelles was higher than that of free curcumin in drug-resistant cancer cells; Gaber et al. [11] synthesized amphiphilic zein–chondroitin sulfate-based copolymeric micelles, which showed lower IC50 cytotoxicity against breast cancer cells.

2.2.2. Hydrogel

Hydrogels have numerous advantages in drug delivery, including biocompatibility, low toxicity and good swelling behavior [64]. Gelation of zein can be formed through the cross-linking of hydrophilic chains in an aqueous microenvironment. The smart hydrogel DDSs can protect the drug from external stimuli such as heat, ionic strength, pH and electric field [65]. For example, Kaushik et al. [27] prepared doxorubicin (DOX)-encapsulated zein NPs by crosslinking pectin hydrogel. The obtained DDS exhibited a pH-responsive release in the acidic tumor microenvironment. Kunjiappan et al. [58] used a graft polymerization technique to prepare a zein–co-acrylic acid hydrogel. The formulation was optimized by a variety of zein, acrylic acid and initiator. Then, 5-fluorouracil and rutin were loaded in this optimized hydrogel. The results of cell experiments showed that these hydrogels could cause 50% death of breast cancer cells when the concentration was 52.5 μg/mL.

2.2.3. Nanoparticles

Zein NPs are easily prepared by a self-assembly process. However, the nanospherical zein with a small particle size (about 200 nm) possesses a higher specific surface area and tends to aggregate according to the principle of minimum system energy. Hence, stabilizers such as lecithin [59], casein [66] and dopamine [67] are used to enhance its stability. In our previous study [60], casein-coated zein-based core–shell NPs were prepared (Figure 6a). The results showed a highly active and stable characteristic, which enhanced approximately 5-fold and 2.5-fold antioxidant activity by DPPH and ABTS assays, respectively. Moreover, the lecithin and dopamine were used to fabricate a stable zein-based DDS (Figure 6b) [25]. The samples showed high stability under the conditions of a saline solution, various pH values, long-term storage and high-speed centrifugation.
Zein NPs possess many unique properties in drug delivery. Dong et al. [60] encapsulated DOX into zein NPs with a high encapsulation efficiency (90.06%) and loading efficiency (15.01 mg/g). The obtained zein NPs entered not only the cytoplasm, but also the cell nucleus. Moreover, zein NPs exhibited pH-responsive release and high cellular uptake behavior. Yu et al. [61] prepared maytansine-loaded zein NPs by phase separation, which exhibited a high tumor inhibition rate (97.3%) and high tumor accumulation ability in vitro and in vivo.

3. The Challenges and Solutions of Zein-Based Nanocarriers for Precise Cancer Therapy

Although zein shows many advantages in delivering various anticancer drugs, it has limitations in terms of burst release, non-specific targeting, concentration variations and side effects. To realize precise delivery of anticancer drugs, the modifications of zein-based nanocarriers should be explored.

3.1. Stable Zein-Based DDSs

The stability of DDSs is important for the delivery of antitumor drugs. Zein-based NPs, nano hydrogels and micelles possess small particle size and high surface energy, which tend to aggregate after short storage periods. Increasing zeta potential is a simple and effective method to improve their stability. For example, if the pH of the solution is changed from pH 7.0 to pH 4.0, the surface potential of the zein particle increases to 40 mV [68], which significantly increases the electrostatic repulsion. Therefore, the stability of zein-based DDSs is enhanced. To improve the stability of the zein solution, modification with, for example, lecithin [59], casein [66] or dopamine [67] is another good choice, but this increases the complexity of the preparation process. It is worth noting that the solution is not suitable for long-term storage and preparing zein-based DDS lyophilized powder is better. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the lyophilization process of zein. Unfortunately, it has not been well reported at present.

3.2. Targeting Zein-Based DDSs

Compared to conventional DDSs, targeting DDSs can reduce drug toxicity and resistance, enhance drug aggregation at the tumor site and avoid damage to healthy cells [69]. To ensure the successful delivery of anticancer drugs, targeting DDSs need to cross multiple biological barriers [70], avoid the elimination of immune systems [71] and reach and enter the targeted cancer cells quickly [72].
During the growth process of solid tumors, the vascular endothelium becomes more permeable than that in the healthy state [18], which is known as the EPR effect [73]. EPR effects depend on intrinsic tumor biological characteristics, nanocarrier size and cycle time [74]. PEGylation is commonly used by zein-based DDSs to enhance their EPR effects. Differing from passive targeting by EPR effects, active targeting DDSs are achieved by binding to tumor cell surface receptors or by simple adsorption [69]. The antitumor effect largely depends on the process of cell internalization, where the affinity between targeting ligands of DDSs and surface receptors of a tumor cell is an important criteria [16]. Table 2 lists the active targeting strategy of zein-based nanocarriers, i.e., conjugating with folic acid, transferrin, peptides and sugar residues.

3.2.1. Conjugating with Folic Acid

The folate receptors’ expression in cancer cells is 500 times higher than that in healthy cells [79]. Therefore, nanocarriers are often modified with folic acid (FA) to enable effective targeted delivery of anticancer drugs. Liu et al. [75] modified the surface of zein NPs with FA for targeted delivery of HCPT (Figure 7a). The grafting degree increased from 2.26 ± 1.13 to 6.20 ± 0.28 (moL/moL) with the FA/zein ratio increasing from 10 to 85. Cytotoxicity studies showed that FA–zein could selectively target the delivery of the anticancer drug and reduce the non-specific toxicity to normal cells. Wang et al. [17] used AuNPs as the core and FA-conjugated amphiphilic zein–PDA as the shell to realize the targeted delivery of HCPT. The results (Figure 7b) showed that strong fluorescence was observed at the tumor site. Soe et al. [80] successfully prepared FA-modified zein NPs with small particle sizes (180 nm) and narrow PDI (0.22). The biological distribution of KB tumor-bearing mice was studied, and the hydrophobic drug PTX showed an enhanced ability of active targeted delivery. Wu et al. [45] prepared FA-conjugated zein-based NPs, which significantly improved the cytotoxicity of docetaxel to cancer cells in vitro.

3.2.2. Grafting with Peptides

Peptides, with low immunogenicity, non-toxic metabolites and enhanced retention in tumor sites, can bind to overexpressed receptors on the surface of cancer cells and can, therefore, be considered as promising active targeting ligands [81]. In our previous work [9], a bio-safe and targeted zein-based DDS was fabricated for chemo-photothermal therapy, where a cRGD peptide-grafted zein was successfully synthesized and coated on the surface of PTX-loaded Au@SiO2 NPs (Figure 8). The results of cell experiments showed that the obtained PTX–cRGD–Zein–Au@SiO2 NPs had strong antitumor activity and uptake ability of tumor cells. Similarly, Zhang et al. [77] prepared novel zein-based NPs for the delivery of dactolisib by using a brain-targeting peptide RVG29. The results showed that RVG29 could promote blood–brain tumor barrier penetration and enhance tumor cellular uptake.

3.2.3. Modifying with Sugar Residues

The cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) is overexpressed in several types of cancers, including liver, ovarian, lung, brain and breast cancers. CD44 has a high affinity for sugar residues such as hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate [82]. Zhang et al. [62] prepared core–shell NPs of zein and hyaluronic acid for the targeted delivery of honokiol. The results showed that adding hyaluronic acid could enhance intracellular uptake as well as cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic activities in vitro. The animal experiment indicated that the anti-tumor effect was improved due to the presence of CD44 receptor-mediated endocytosis. In another study, Li et al. [78] developed novel chondroitin sulfate hybrid zein-based NPs for targeted delivery of dactolisib. The obtained DDS could improve the colloidal stability and cellular uptake efficiency, which showed an effective accumulation of NPs in tumor tissues.

3.2.4. Others

Cell membrane coating technology offers a new opportunity for precision drug delivery [15,83,84]. Using this technology, the highly complex cell membrane functionalities can be completely replicated. This endows the DDS with prolonged systemic circulation time, targeting capability and enhanced internalization [85]. In our previous work [7], the cancer cell membranes were coated on the surface of the zein NPs (Figure 9). The experiments of hemolysis and cell safety tests implied that the DDS was safe in the in vitro study. The cancer cell cytotoxicity, nuclear activity and cell uptake experiments showed that the DDS possessed enhanced homotype targeting ability.
Lactoferrin is a natural cationic glycoprotein, which is a member of the transferrin family. It can bind to transferrin receptors and lactoferrin membrane internalized receptors, which are overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells and blood–brain barrier cells [76]. Based on this unique character, transferrin is widely used to functionalize nanocarriers for active targeting delivery. Sabra et al. [56] successfully developed an amphiphilic polymeric micelle, which had a hydrophobic zein core and a hydrophilic lactoferrin shell. The hydrophilic lactoferrin shell could enhance the tumor targeting, reduce the interaction between micelles and serum proteins and prolong systemic circulation of the nanocarriers.

3.3. Responsive Zein-Based DDSs

The tumor microenvironment is the internal environment in the tumor growth process, which consists of cancer cells, blood vasculature, stromal cells, and extracellular matrix [86]. The tumor microenvironment is considered as the “soil” for tumor development and is an important part of tumor tissue. Compared with the normal internal environment of the human body, the tumor microenvironment has many unique biochemical characteristics, such as weak acidity, strong reduction, strong oxidation, low oxygen and up-regulation of enzyme secretion [87,88]. Based on the understanding of the unique characteristics of the tumor microenvironment, stimulating responsive cancer therapies have been developed to realize triggering drug release [89]. Nowadays, zein-based nanocarriers have been designed to achieve a rapid response to various stimuli, including pH, redox, temperature and photo- and magnetic fields [90].

3.3.1. pH Response

Due to uncontrolled tumor growth and abnormal gene expression, the physiological characteristics of tumor tissues are exhibited significantly differently from those of normal tissues [91]. Irregular angiogenesis at rapidly growing tumor sites leads to the deficiency of nutrients and oxygen; thus, glycolytic metabolism occurs, and acidic metabolites are generated in the tumor interstitium [92]. It has been reported that the approximate pH range of the tumor site is from 6.5 to 7.0, and pH in normal tissue is about 7.4 [93]. Liang et al. [94] developed a metal–polyphenol-coated zein DDS to deliver DOX to tumor tissues. Cleavage of the metal–polyphenol network was easily disrupted in lower pH, resulting in pH-responsive drug delivery. Anirudhan et al. [95] prepared pH-responsive nanocarriers using aminated mesoporous silica NPs as a backbone and glycyrrhetinic acid-conjugated zein as a shell. The release of 5-fluorouracil and curcumin was higher at pH 5.5 than that at pH 7.4. Kaushik et al. [27] reported a pH-responsive gel of zein-based nanocarriers. The controlled release of DOX was achieved at pH 6.4 at 37 °C. The prepared hydrogel could facilitate the pH-responsive release of DOX into the cytoplasmic acidic environment of HeLa cells.

3.3.2. Redox Response

It is well known that the redox potential between healthy and tumor cells is different, which provides a strategy for developing stimulus-responsive DDSs. Glutathione (GSH) is an important intracellular antioxidant that regulates the redox state of cells [96]. Disulfide bonds are typical redox-reactive covalent bonds. GSH can control the cytoreductive environment by using excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) to form and cleave disulfide bonds [97]. It has been reported that the concentration of GSH in tumor cells is significantly higher than that in normal cells [98,99]. Hence, redox-responsive DDSs offer an opportunity for precise cancer therapy. For example, Hou et al. [24] synthesized a novel redox-triggered zein-based DDS. In vitro release assays showed that PTX was not released without GSH. The antitumor efficiency in vitro and in vivo showed that redox-triggered DDSs tended to approach cancer cells more than normal cells.

3.3.3. Photo Response

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a novel medical tool that uses photosensitizers to kill cancer cells [100]. The light-sensitive material can absorb light energy and convert it into heat energy, which can promote anticancer drug release and inhibit tumor cell activity. The photo response systems are non-invasive, which can increase the therapeutic effect and patient compliance [101]. Indocyanine green (ICG), a near-infrared dye, has potential application in the cancer phototherapy photosensitizer. After exposure to near infrared ray (NIR), ICG can generate ROS and cause tumor cell death. Li et al. [102] reported ICG-encapsulated zein–phosphatidylcholine NPs for the phototherapy of cancer. Cancer cell experiment analysis showed that encapsulated ICG enhanced the photocytotoxicity greatly. Yu et al. [14] have fabricated docetaxel-loaded zein NPs coated by a green tea polyphenols/iron coordination complex (GTP/FeIII, a photothermal agent) to achieve a combined chemical–immune–photothermal therapy. The photothermal conversion efficiency of NPs was 37.82% under 808 nm NIR laser irradiation (2 W/cm2). In vitro cytotoxicity studies and in vivo antitumor experiments showed that the NPs exhibited a strong inhibitory effect in tumor cells.

3.3.4. Magnetic Response

Magnetic NPs for biomedical applications depend not only on their intrinsic magnetic properties, but also on their biophysical properties under physiological conditions [103]. Magnetic NPs are usually divided into pure metals, metal oxides and magnetic nanocomposites. Magnetically responsive NPs can accumulate at the tumor site under precise spatial guidance of in vitro magnetic field [104]. Embedding the magnetic NPs into zein-based DDSs enhances the drug delivery performance. Pang et al. [105] fabricated a magnetic zein-based nanocomplex by adding the Fe3O4 into zein NPs during the self-assembly process (Figure 10). The data of in vitro cellular uptake analysis showed that the fluorescence signal was over 95.6% for cells within 10 min under control of an external magnetic field, suggesting that a magnetic field could enhance the cellular uptake in vitro.

3.4. Hybrid Zein-Based DDSs

For precise cancer therapy, zein-based nanocarriers exhibit some shortcomings such as stability, targeting and hydrophobicity [106]. To enhance the performance of zein NPs and optimize their therapeutic effects, it is necessary to design rational nanocarriers. Fabricating hybrid zein-based DDSs can achieve different anticancer effects by combining the advantages of each component, such as zein–polysaccharide hybrid NPs, zein–protein hybrid NPs, zein–surfactant hybrid NPs and zein–inorganic hybrid NPs. The zein-based hybrid NPs can be prepared by the driving forces of electrostatic, hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interaction forces [107]. Under this interaction, co-assembly between the zein and hybrid NPs occurs; integrating their advantages into one unit can obtain precise cancer therapy.

3.4.1. Zein–Polysaccharide Hybrid NPs

Polysaccharide-based NPs have promising potential in biomedical applications [108]. Polysaccharides are widely used for drug delivery in cancer therapy because of their advantages, including wide source, low cost, good biological activity and biodegradability [109]. In addition, polysaccharides have a lot of reactive functional groups, such as amino, hydroxyl and carboxyl moieties, which are beneficial for drug conjugation and physicochemical crosslinking with other proteins. Liu et al. [110] reported a zein formulation with three polysaccharides. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that the addition of polysaccharides could enhance the delivery and accumulation of curcumin in colorectal cancer tumors. Ye et al. [111] prepared alginate-stabilized zein NPs for DOX delivery by flash nanoprecipitation. The addition of alginate could reduce the burst release of DOX and prolong the action time of drugs, thus enhancing the antitumor effect. Li et al. [78] prepared a polysaccharide (chondroitin sulfate) and zein hybrid NPs for delivery of docetaxel. In vitro and in vivo studies showed that chondroitin sulfate could improve the colloidal stability and cellular uptake efficiency of zein NPs. In addition, zein/chondroitin sulfate NPs could accumulate in tumor tissues without significant systemic toxicity.

3.4.2. Zein–Protein Hybrid NPs

Hybrid with hydrophilic proteins is an effective method to improve the performance of zein-based NPs. Lu et al. [112] used hydrophilic animal protein (silk fibroin) and zein to prepare hybrid NPs. In this study, PTX and curcumin were encapsulated in hybrid NPs, and the inhibition ability of tumor cell growth was shown to be stronger than that of free PTX or curcumin. Chen et al. [12] prepared hybrid NPs with an optimal weight ratio of zein/bovine serum albumin (BSA) of 1:2. Among them, curcumin had higher binding strength to zein/BSA NPs, and the NPs exhibited high encapsulation efficiency and storage stability. Similarly, lipid can also be used to improve the performance of zein-based NPs. Kamel et al. [113] designed novel hybrid lipid nanocore–protein shell NPs (HLPNPs) using lipid as a core and zein as a shell. All-trans retinoic acid and genistein were loaded into the NPs. In vivo anticancer efficacy of HLPNPs showed the lowest lung lesion numbers, along with significant decrease in metastatic foci diameters and tumor biomarkers.

3.4.3. Zein–Surfactant Hybrid NPs

In the development process of drug formulations, surfactants are often used as wetting agents to improve the dissolution of insoluble drugs [114]. In order to screen stabilizers for zein-based nanocarriers, Gagliardi et al. [115] applied Tween 80, Poloxam 188 and sodium deoxycholate to prepare zein–surfactant hybrid NPs. The physicochemical characterizations of the NPs were evaluated to optimize the drug formulation. Among them, sodium deoxycholate-based zein NPs exhibited a small size (~100 nm), low DPI and negative surface charge (−30 mV). After that, Gagliardi et al. [116] loaded the PTX into the fabricated sodium deoxycholate-stable zein NPs. The obtained DDSs could effectively retain PTX and increase toxicity in different cancer cell lines. Ye et al. [40] prepared pluronic–zein–curcumin DDSs, which improved the performance of zein in hydrophilicity, stability and drug delivery. After being modified with pluronic, the surface contact angle was reduced by 33.1–62.8% and DDS remained stable under pH and salinity conditions.

3.4.4. Zein–Inorganic Hybrid NPs

Inorganic NPs (such as gold, silicon, carbon nanotubes and iron oxide) have large surface area, controllable structure and special optical properties, which are commonly used to enhance the performance of DDSs [117]. Zein–inorganic NPs have been intensively investigated to combine the advantages of zein and inorganic nanocarriers [118]. Chauhan et al. [8] prepared gold-deposited zein nanoshells (AuZNS) by depositing thin layers of gold on ethylene glycol chitosan-stabilized zein NPs. The AuZNS with a particle size of 100 nm could realize photothermal cancer therapy, and the cell viability of two different cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and C33A) was reduced to 25% under 808 nm laser irradiation for 5 min. Anirudhan et al. [95] used zein as a shell to encapsulate mesoporous silica for preventing premature drug leakage and realizing sustained release. Bahmani et al. [119] used zein-based multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) to prepared nanofibers, and DOX and PTX were loaded. These composite core–shell nanofibers showed the synergistic therapeutic effects of MWCNTs and anticancer drugs, which had a high biocompatibility, with 84% of MCF-7 cancer cells killed at a low dosage.

4. Outlook

Although zein-based DDSs have exhibited a powerful performance for cancer therapy, there are still some challenges for their clinical translation. (1) Similarly with other nano-DDSs, the stability of zein-based DDSs is the key point for their clinical translation. NPs with a small size have a high surface energy, which results in the aggregation of samples. Surface modification is a good strategy for improving stability, such as modification with lecithin, casein and dopamine. (2) The hydrophobicity of zein will be easily cleared by immune cells. Although PEGylation and cell membrane technology have developed, there is still a long way to go for their clinical application. (3) Challenges also remain in the large-scale production of zein-based DDSs with uniform particle size, high encapsulation rate and drug loading capacity. This is a need to develop new techniques and instruments to further optimize preparation methods. Additionally, how to reduce batch-to-batch errors is a big puzzle. Recently, microfluidics technology has shown promising potential for solving this challenge, but industrial-grade equipment and technical theory should be further developed. Therefore, there are current challenges but also promising opportunities for zein-based nanocarriers in clinical translation.

5. Conclusions

Cancer has undoubtedly become one of the most important topics for public health problems. Although tremendous efforts have been paid in the past decade, precise anticancer drug delivery is underway and has yet to be fully realized. Recently, zein-based nanocarriers have emerged as a new generation of anticancer DDSs due to their specific promising physicochemical characteristics. The emerging advanced technology for preparing zein-based DDS has played an important role in the preparation of stable, targeting delivery, stimuli-responsive and multifunctional-hybrid zein-based NPs. In this review, the recent progress in zein-based nanocarriers for precise anticancer drug delivery is summarized. Novel methods by using ultrasonic dialysis, SCF and microfluidic technology have been extensively developed toward the control of drug loading. Zein-based NPs, micelles, hydrogels and films have been prepared for cancer therapy. Additionally, to realize precise delivery of anticancer drugs, stable, targeting, responsive and hybrid zein-based DDSs have been developed. However, most of them are still at an early stage, and there are many challenges for their clinical translation. Potential efforts must be made to the specific modifications of zein-based carriers, including controllable preparation, large-scale production and clinical study. With continued innovation and development, the clinical translation of zein-based nanocarriers for precise cancer therapy will finally come true.

Author Contributions

W.H. and F.Y.: conceptualization, investigation & writing—original draft preparation. S.T. and M.L.: investigation & editing. G.L. and Y.J.: supervision, writing—review & editing, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial supports from the Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (No. 820QN249) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22008046) are greatly appreciated.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, T.; Tai, Z.; Cui, Z.; Chai, R.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, Z. Nano-engineered immune cells as “guided missiles” for cancer therapy. J. Control. Release 2022, 341, 60–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qi, L.; Luo, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, F.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, F. Advances in toxicological research of the anticancer drug cisplatin. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019, 32, 1469–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bhattacharya, S. Genotoxicity and in vitro investigation of Gefitinib-loaded polycaprolactone fabricated nanoparticles for anticancer activity against NCI-H460 cell lines. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2022, 17, 214–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qiao, H.; Chen, Z.; Fu, S.; Yu, X.; Sun, M.; Zhai, Y.; Sun, J. Emerging platinum(0) nanotherapeutics for efficient cancer therapy. J. Control. Release 2022, 352, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fang, C.Y.; Lou, D.Y.; Zhou, L.Q.; Wang, J.C.; Yang, B.; He, Q.J.; Wang, J.J.; Weng, Q.J. Natural products: Potential treatments for cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2021, 42, 1951–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, W.Q.; Li, Z.Q.; Liu, W.Q.; Liu, S.Y.; Zhou, R.J.; Jiang, Y.B. Preparation of B16 cancer cell membrane coated α-zein biomimetic drug delivery system for the enhancement of homotypic target ability. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 194, 116301–116312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chauhan, D.S.; Arunkumar, P.; Prasad, R.; Mishra, S.K.; Reddy, B.P.K.; De, A.; Srivastava, R. Facile synthesis of plasmonic zein nanoshells for imaging-guided photothermal cancer therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 90, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, W.Q.; Deng, Y.H.; Ye, L.P.; Xie, Q.L.; Jiang, Y.B. Enhancing hemocompatibility and the performance of Au@silica nanoparticles by coating with cRGD functionalized zein. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 125, 112064–112076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, L.; Li, L.; He, X.; Yi, Q.; He, B.; Cao, J.; Pan, W.; Gu, Z. Overcoming drug-resistant lung cancer by paclitaxel loaded dual-functional liposomes with mitochondria targeting and pH-response. Biomaterials 2015, 52, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gaber, M.; Elhasany, K.A.; Sabra, S.; Helmy, M.W.; Fang, J.Y.; Khattab, S.N.; Bekhit, A.A.; Teleb, M.; Elkodairy, K.A.; Elzoghby, A.O. Co-administration of tretinoin enhances the anti-cancer efficacy of etoposide via tumor-targeted green nano-micelles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 192, 110997–111007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, X.; Yu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.C.; Ma, Y.; Li, H.J. Co-encapsulation of curcumin and resveratrol in zein-bovine serum albumin nanoparticles using a pH-driven method. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 3169–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dong, P.; Rakesh, K.P.; Manukumar, H.M.; Mohammed, Y.H.E.; Karthik, C.S.; Sumathi, S.; Mallu, P.; Qin, H.L. Innovative nano-carriers in anticancer drug delivery—A comprehensive review. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 85, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, X.; Han, N.; Dong, Z.; Dang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, W.; Wang, C.; Du, S.; Lu, Y. Combined chemo-immuno-photothermal therapy for effective cancer treatment via an all-in-one and one-for-all nanoplatform. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2022, 14, 42988–43009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jin, J.; Krishnamachary, B.; Barnett, J.D.; Chatterjee, S.; Chang, D.; Mironchik, Y.; Wildes, F.; Jaffee, E.M.; Nimmagadda, S.; Bhujwalla, Z.M. Human cancer cell membrane-coated biomimetic nanoparticles reduce fibroblast-mediated invasion and metastasis and induce T-cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2019, 11, 7850–7861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Danhier, F.; Feron, O.; Preat, V. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2010, 148, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, H.D.; Zhu, W.; Huang, Y.N.; Li, Z.X.; Jiang, Y.B.; Xie, Q.L. Facile encapsulation of hydroxycamptothecin nanocrystals into zein-based nanocomplexes for active targeting in drug delivery and cell imaging. Acta Biomater. 2017, 61, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nakamura, Y.; Mochida, A.; Choyke, P.L.; Kobayashi, H. Nanodrug delivery: Is the enhanced permeability and retention effect sufficient for curing cancer? Bioconjug. Chem. 2016, 27, 2225–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hassan, E.A.; Hathout, R.M.; Gad, H.A.; Sammour, O.A. Multi-purpose zein nanoparticles for battling hepatocellular carcinoma: A green approach. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 176, 111396–111408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Caro, C.; Pozo, D. Polysaccharide colloids as smart vehicles in cancer therapy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 4822–4836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nichols, J.W.; Bae, Y.H. EPR: Evidence and fallacy. J. Control. Release 2014, 190, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Caro, C.; Avasthi, A.; Paez-Munoz, J.M.; Pernia Leal, M.; Garcia-Martin, M.L. Passive targeting of high-grade gliomas via the EPR effect: A closed path for metallic nanoparticles? Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 7984–7995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Z.; Liu, W.; Sun, C.; Wei, X.; Liu, S.; Jiang, Y. Gastrointestinal pH-sensitive pickering emulsions stabilized by zein nanoparticles coated with bioactive glycyrrhizic acid for improving oral bioaccessibility of curcumin. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2023, 15, 14678–14689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hou, H.T.; Zhang, D.; Lin, J.W.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Li, C.Y.; Wang, Z.; Ren, J.Y.; Yao, M.J.; Wong, K.H.; Wang, Y. Zein-paclitaxel prodrug nanoparticles for redox-triggered drug delivery and enhanced therapeutic efficiency. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 11812–11822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, W.; Li, S.; Li, Z.; Zhu, W.; Lu, S.; Jiang, Y. Development of a resveratrol–zein–dopamine–lecithin delivery system with enhanced stability and mucus permeation. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 8591–8601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. van Ballegooie, C.; Wretham, N.; Ren, T.; Popescu, I.M.; Yapp, D.T.; Bally, M.B. PEG conjugated zein nanoparticles for in vivo use. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1831–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kaushik, P.; Priyadarshini, E.; Rawat, K.; Rajamani, P.; Bohidar, H.B. pH responsive doxorubucin loaded zein nanoparticle crosslinked pectin hydrogel as effective site-specific anticancer substrates. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 1027–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.D.; Zhang, X.T.; Zhu, W.; Jiang, Y.B.; Zhang, Z.B. Self-assembly of zein-based microcarrier system for colon-targeted oral drug delivery. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 12689–12699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhu, W.; Huang, W.; Ye, L.; Deng, Y.; Xie, Q.; Jiang, Y. Facile preparation of succinylated-zein-ZIF-8 hybrid for enhanced stability and pH-responsive drug delivery. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 228, 115981–115992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, H.; Zhai, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhai, G. New progress and prospects: The application of nanogel in drug delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 60, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Seok, H.Y.; Rejinold, N.S.; Lekshmi, K.M.; Cherukula, K.; Park, I.K.; Kim, Y.C. CD44 targeting biocompatible and biodegradable hyaluronic acid cross-linked zein nanogels for curcumin delivery to cancer cells: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. J. Control. Release 2018, 280, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Elzoghby, A.O.; El-Lakany, S.A.; Helmy, M.W.; Abu-Serie, M.M.; Elgindy, N.A. Shell-crosslinked zein nanocapsules for oral codelivery of exemestane and resveratrol in breast cancer therapy. Nanomedicine 2017, 12, 2785–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. von Baeckmann, C.; Rubio, G.; Kahlig, H.; Kurzbach, D.; Reithofer, M.R.; Kleitz, F. Evaporation-induced self-assembly of small peptide-conjugated silica nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 22700–22705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; Padua, G.W. Nanoscale characterization of zein self-assembly. Langmuir 2012, 28, 2429–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cai, T.; Xiao, P.; Yu, N.; Zhou, Y.; Mao, J.; Peng, H.; Deng, S. A novel pectin from Akebia trifoliata var. australis fruit peel and its use as a wall-material to coat curcumin-loaded zein nanoparticle. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, M.; Ganesan, K.; Gao, F.; Liu, Q.; Ye, Z.; Sui, Y.; Zhang, F.; Wei, K.; et al. A tumor-targeted delivery of oral isoliquiritigenin through encapsulated zein phosphatidylcholine hybrid nanoparticles prevents triple-negative breast cancer. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 79, 103922–103938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, J.; Sun, C.; Gul, K.; Mata, A.; Fang, Y. Prolamin-based complexes: Structure design and food-related applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 1120–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, F.Y.; Yang, L.L.; Wang, S.Y.; Ying, X.G.; Ling, J.H.; Ouyang, X.K. Fabrication and characterization of zein-alginate oligosaccharide complex nanoparticles as delivery vehicles of curcumin. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 342, 116937–116942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, G.J.; Wei, D.W.; Wang, H.D.; Hu, Y.T.; Jiang, Y.B. Self-assembly of zein microspheres with controllable particle size and narrow distribution using a novel built-in ultrasonic dialysis process. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 1094–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ye, L.; Huang, W.; Deng, Y.; Li, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Xie, Q. Development of a pluronic-zein-curcumin drug delivery system with effective improvement of hydrophilicity, stability and sustained-release. J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 104, 103412–103420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Park, H.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, S.; Ha, E.S.; Kim, M.S.; Hwang, S.J. Pharmaceutical applications of supercritical fluid extraction of emulsions for micro-/nanoparticle formation. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1928–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Long, B.; Walker, G.M.; Ryan, K.M.; Padrela, L. Controlling polymorphism of carbamazepine nanoparticles in a continuous supercritical-CO2-assisted spray drying process. Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19, 3755–3767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Palazzo, I.; Campardelli, R.; Scognamiglio, M.; Reverchon, E. Zein/luteolin microparticles formation using a supercritical fluids assisted technique. Powder Technol. 2019, 356, 899–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, G.J.; Li, S.M.; Huang, Y.X.; Wang, H.D.; Jiang, Y.B. Incorporation of 10-hydroxycamptothecin nanocrystals into zein microspheres. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 155, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Wei, D.; Tang, L.; Deng, S.; Liu, G. Rational fabrication of folate-conjugated zein/soy lecithin/carboxymethyl chitosan core-shell nanoparticles for delivery of docetaxel. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 13371–13381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Wu, Z.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Deng, S.; Liu, G. Development of carboxymethyl chitosan-coated zein/soy lecithin nanoparticles for the delivery of resveratrol. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 1636–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jain, V.; Patel, V.B.; Singh, B.; Varade, D. Microfluidic device based molecular Self-Assembly structures. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 362, 119760–119774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Staufer, O.; Antona, S.; Zhang, D.; Csatari, J.; Schroter, M.; Janiesch, J.W.; Fabritz, S.; Berger, I.; Platzman, I.; Spatz, J.P. Microfluidic production and characterization of biofunctionalized giant unilamellar vesicles for targeted intracellular cargo delivery. Biomaterials 2021, 264, 120203–120216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guo, H.; Feng, Y.; Deng, Y.; Yan, T.; Liang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xu, E.; Liu, D.; Wang, W. Continuous flow modulates zein nanoprecipitation solvent environment to obtain colloidal particles with high curcumin loading. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 134, 108089–108099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meewan, J.; Somani, S.; Almowalad, J.; Laskar, P.; Mullin, M.; MacKenzie, G.; Khadke, S.; Perrie, Y.; Dufes, C. Preparation of zein-based nanoparticles: Nanoprecipitation versus microfluidic-assisted manufacture, effects of PEGylation on nanoparticle characteristics and cellular uptake by melanoma cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2022, 17, 2809–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Olenskyj, A.G.; Feng, Y.; Lee, Y. Continuous microfluidic production of zein nanoparticles and correlation of particle size with physical parameters determined using CFD simulation. J. Food Eng. 2017, 211, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, Y.; Sun, L.; Zhang, H.; Shang, L.; Zhao, Y. Microfluidics for drug development: From synthesis to evaluation. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 7468–7529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tran, P.; Pyo, Y.C.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, S.E.; Kim, J.K.; Park, J.S. Overview of the manufacturing methods of solid dispersion technology for improving the solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs and application to anticancer Drugs. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 132–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Vig, B.S.; Huttunen, K.M.; Laine, K.; Rautio, J. Amino acids as promoieties in prodrug design and development. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 1370–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Podaralla, S.; Averineni, R.; Alqahtani, M.; Perumal, O. Synthesis of novel biodegradable methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-zein micelles for effective delivery of curcumin. Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 2778–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sabra, S.A.; Elzoghby, A.O.; Sheweita, S.A.; Haroun, M.; Helmy, M.W.; Eldemellawy, M.A.; Xia, Y.; Goodale, D.; Allan, A.L.; Rohani, S. Self-assembled amphiphilic zein-lactoferrin micelles for tumor targeted co-delivery of rapamycin and wogonin to breast cancer. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2018, 128, 156–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Song, R.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Li, F.; Huang, Q.; Shi, T.; Zhang, G. Preparation and characterization of mPEG-g-α-zein biohybrid micelles as a nano-carrier. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42555–42560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kunjiappan, S.; Theivendran, P.; Baskararaj, S.; Sankaranarayanan, B.; Palanisamy, P.; Saravanan, G.; Arunachalam, S.; Sankaranarayanan, M.; Natarajan, J.; Somasundaram, B.; et al. Modeling a pH-sensitive zein-co-acrylic acid hybrid hydrogels loaded 5-fluorouracil and rutin for enhanced anticancer efficacy by oral delivery. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shinde, P.; Agraval, H.; Srivastav, A.K.; Yadav, U.C.S.; Kumar, U. Physico-chemical characterization of carvacrol loaded zein nanoparticles for enhanced anticancer activity and investigation of molecular interactions between them by molecular docking. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 588, 119795–119806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dong, F.; Dong, X.; Zhou, L.; Xiao, H.; Ho, P.Y.; Wong, M.S.; Wang, Y. Doxorubicin-loaded biodegradable self-assembly zein nanoparticle and its anti-cancer effect: Preparation, in vitro evaluation, and cellular uptake. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 140, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yu, X.; Wu, H.; Hu, H.; Dong, Z.; Dang, Y.; Qi, Q.; Wang, Y.; Du, S.; Lu, Y. Zein nanoparticles as nontoxic delivery system for maytansine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Drug Deliv. 2020, 27, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Zhang, Q.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Zhu, W.; Guan, S.; Fan, L.; Cai, D. Targeted delivery of honokiol by zein/hyaluronic acid core-shell nanoparticles to suppress breast cancer growth and metastasis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 240, 116325–116337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hanafy, N.A.N.; El-Kemary, M.; Leporatti, S. Micelles structure development as a strategy to improve smart cancer therapy. Cancers 2018, 10, 238–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Vashist, A.; Vashist, A.; Gupta, Y.K.; Ahmad, S. Recent advances in hydrogel based drug delivery systems for the human body. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 147–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Paliwal, R.; Palakurthi, S. Zein in controlled drug delivery and tissue engineering. J. Control. Release 2014, 189, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, H.; Xu, Y.; Sun, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J.; Wang, D.; Zhao, L. Stability, bioactivity, and bioaccessibility of fucoxanthin in zein-caseinate composite nanoparticles fabricated at neutral pH by antisolvent precipitation. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 84, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, S.; Li, Z.; Pang, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Xie, Q.; Jiang, Y. Polydopamine-mediated carrier with stabilizing and self-antioxidative properties for polyphenol delivery systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, W.Q.; Liu, S.Y.; Li, Z.Q.; Liu, Y.Y.; Xie, Q.L.; Jiang, Y.B. Analysis of the differences in self-assembly behaviour, molecular structure and drug delivery performance between alpha and beta-Zein. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 181, 114822–114836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Attia, M.F.; Anton, N.; Wallyn, J.; Omran, Z.; Vandamme, T.F. An overview of active and passive targeting strategies to improve the nanocarriers efficiency to tumour sites. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019, 71, 1185–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Poon, W.; Kingston, B.R.; Ouyang, B.; Ngo, W.; Chan, W.C.W. A framework for designing delivery systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jee, J.-P.; Na, J.H.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.H.; Choi, K.; Yeo, Y.; Kwon, I.C. Cancer targeting strategies in nanomedicine: Design and application of chitosan nanoparticles. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2012, 16, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Frohlich, E. The role of surface charge in cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of medical nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 5577–5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Shinde, V.R.; Revi, N.; Murugappan, S.; Singh, S.P.; Rengan, A.K. Enhanced permeability and retention effect: A key facilitator for solid tumor targeting by nanoparticles. Photodiag. Photodyn. Ther. 2022, 39, 102915–102926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Subhan, M.A.; Yalamarty, S.S.K.; Filipczak, N.; Parveen, F.; Torchilin, V.P. Recent advances in tumor targeting via EPR effect for cancer treatment. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 571–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, G.; Pang, J.; Huang, Y.; Xie, Q.; Guan, G.; Jiang, Y. Self-assembled nanospheres of folate-decorated zein for the targeted delivery of 10-Hydroxycamptothecin. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 8517–8527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Agwa, M.M.; Sabra, S. Lactoferrin coated or conjugated nanomaterials as an active targeting approach in nanomedicine. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 1527–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, D.; Kong, J.; Huang, X.; Zeng, J.; Du, Q.; Yang, T.; Yue, H.; Bao, Q.; Miao, Y.; Xu, Y.; et al. Targeted glioblastoma therapy by integrating brain-targeting peptides and corn-derived cancer cell-penetrating proteins into nanoparticles to cross blood-brain tumor barriers. Mater. Today Nano 2023, 23, 100347–100365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, H.S.; Kang, N.W.; Kim, H.; Kim, D.H.; Chae, J.W.; Lee, W.; Song, G.Y.; Cho, C.W.; Kim, D.D.; Lee, J.Y. Chondroitin sulfate-hybridized zein nanoparticles for tumor-targeted delivery of docetaxel. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 253, 117187–117199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. McCord, E.; Pawar, S.; Koneru, T.; Tatiparti, K.; Sau, S.; Iyer, A.K. Folate receptors’ expression in gliomas may possess potential nanoparticle-based drug delivery opportunities. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 4111–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Soe, Z.C.; Ou, W.; Gautam, M.; Poudel, K.; Kim, B.K.; Pham, L.M.; Phung, C.D.; Jeong, J.H.; Jin, S.G.; Choi, H.G.; et al. Development of folate-functionalized PEGylated zein nanoparticles for ligand-directed delivery of paclitaxel. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 562–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Hoppenz, P.; Els-Heindl, S.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G. Peptide-drug conjugates and their targets in advanced cancer therapies. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 571–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kesharwani, P.; Chadar, R.; Sheikh, A.; Rizg, W.Y.; Safhi, A.Y. CD44-targeted nanocarrier for cancer therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 800481–800513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Gan, J.; Du, G.; He, C.; Jiang, M.; Mou, X.; Xue, J.; Sun, X. Tumor cell membrane enveloped aluminum phosphate nanoparticles for enhanced cancer vaccination. J. Control. Release 2020, 326, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rao, L.; Yu, G.T.; Meng, Q.F.; Bu, L.L.; Tian, R.; Lin, L.S.; Deng, H.Z.; Yang, W.J.; Zan, M.H.; Ding, J.X.; et al. Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for personalized therapy in patient-derived xenograft models. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1905671–1905680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nie, D.; Dai, Z.; Li, J.; Yang, Y.; Xi, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Qian, K.; Guo, S.; Zhu, C.; et al. Cancer-cell-membrane-coated nanoparticles with a yolk-shell structure augment cancer chemotherapy. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 936–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Rahmanian, M.; Seyfoori, A.; Ghasemi, M.; Shamsi, M.; Kolahchi, A.R.; Modarres, H.P.; Sanati-Nezhad, A.; Majidzadeh, A.K. In-vitro tumor microenvironment models containing physical and biological barriers for modelling multidrug resistance mechanisms and multidrug delivery strategies. J. Control. Release 2021, 334, 164–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jing, X.; Hu, H.; Sun, Y.; Yu, B.; Cong, H.; Shen, Y. The intracellular and extracellular microenvironment of tumor site: The trigger of stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems. Small Methods 2022, 6, 2101437–2101460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Shi, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Ma, H. Tumor microenvironment-responsive polypeptide nanogels for controlled antitumor drug delivery. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 748102–748121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhu, L.; Torchilin, V.P. Stimulus-responsive nanopreparations for tumor targeting. Integr. Biol. 2013, 5, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Morales-Cruz, M.; Delgado, Y.; Castillo, B.; Figueroa, C.M.; Molina, A.M.; Torres, A.; Milian, M.; Griebenow, K. Smart targeting to improve cancer therapeutics. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2019, 13, 3753–3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Zhang, Y.R.; Lin, R.; Li, H.J.; He, W.L.; Du, J.Z.; Wang, J. Strategies to improve tumor penetration of nanomedicines through nanoparticle design. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2019, 11, 1519–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Yang, J.; Zhou, C.; Sun, J. pH-sensitive polymeric micelles triggered drug release for extracellular and intracellular drug targeting delivery. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 8, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Lee, E.S.; Gao, Z.; Bae, Y.H. Recent progress in tumor pH targeting nanotechnology. J. Control. Release 2008, 132, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Liang, H.; Zhou, B.; Li, J.; Xu, W.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, B. Supramolecular design of coordination bonding architecture on zein nanoparticles for pH-responsive anticancer drug delivery. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 136, 1224–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Anirudhan, T.S.; Bini, B.S.; Manjusha, V. Glycyrrhetinic acid conjugated zein capped aminated mesoporous silica nanoparticle-based dual drug delivery system for liver: A pH-dependent triggered release. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 340, 116852–116862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kennedy, L.; Sandhu, J.K.; Harper, M.E.; Cuperlovic-Culf, M. Role of glutathione in cancer: From mechanisms to therapies. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1429–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sun, B.; Luo, C.; Yu, H.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Q.; Yang, W.; Wang, M.; Kan, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; et al. Disulfide bond-driven oxidation- and reduction-responsive prodrug nanoassemblies for cancer therapy. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 3643–3650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mura, S.; Nicolas, J.; Couvreur, P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 991–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fu, L.H.; Wan, Y.; Qi, C.; He, J.; Li, C.; Yang, C.; Xu, H.; Lin, J.; Huang, P. Nanocatalytic theranostics with glutathione depletion and enhanced reactive oxygen species generation for efficient cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006892–2006902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chen, J.; Fan, T.; Xie, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Xue, P.; Zheng, T.; Chen, Y.; Luo, X.; Zhang, H. Advances in nanomaterials for photodynamic therapy applications: Status and challenges. Biomaterials 2020, 237, 119827–119853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Senthilkumar, T.; Zhou, L.; Gu, Q.; Liu, L.; Lv, F.; Wang, S. Conjugated polymer nanoparticles with appended photo-responsive units for controlled drug delivery, release, and imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 13114–13119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Lee, E.H.; Lee, M.K.; Lim, S.J. Enhanced stability of indocyanine green by encapsulation in zein-phosphatidylcholine hybrid nanoparticles for use in the phototherapy of cancer. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Cardoso, V.F.; Francesko, A.; Ribeiro, C.; Banobre-Lopez, M.; Martins, P.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Advances in magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1700845–1700879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kang, T.; Li, F.; Baik, S.; Shao, W.; Ling, D.; Hyeon, T. Surface design of magnetic nanoparticles for stimuli-responsive cancer imaging and therapy. Biomaterials 2017, 136, 98–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Pang, J.F.; Li, Z.X.; Li, S.M.; Lin, S.Y.; Wang, H.D.; Xie, Q.L.; Jiang, Y.B. Folate-conjugated zein/Fe3O4 nanocomplexes for the enhancement of cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gefitinib. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 14907–14921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xu, H.; Jiang, Q.; Reddy, N.; Yang, Y. Hollow nanoparticles from zein for potential medical applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 18227–18235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Luo, Y.; Wang, Q. Zein-based micro- and nano-particles for drug and nutrient delivery: A review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 40696–40707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. El-Naggar, M.E.; Othman, S.I.; Allam, A.A.; Morsy, O.M. Synthesis, drying process and medical application of polysaccharide-based aerogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 1115–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S. Multiple-therapy strategies via polysaccharides-based nano-systems in fighting cancer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 269, 118323–118341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Liu, L.; Yang, S.; Chen, F.; Cheng, K.W. Polysaccharide-zein composite nanoparticles for enhancing cellular uptake and oral bioavailability of curcumin: Characterization, anti-colorectal cancer effect, and pharmacokinetics. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 846282–846292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ye, W.; Zhang, G.; Liu, X.; Ren, Q.; Huang, F.; Yan, Y. Fabrication of polysaccharide-stabilized zein nanoparticles by flash nanoprecipitation for doxorubicin sustained release. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Tecnol. 2022, 70, 103183–103193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lu, M.; Wu, M.; Huang, Y.; Yao, J.; Shao, Z.; Chen, X. Animal protein-plant protein composite nanospheres for dual-drug loading and synergistic cancer therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 3798–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kamel, N.M.; Helmy, M.W.; Abdelfattah, E.Z.; Khattab, S.N.; Ragab, D.; Samaha, M.W.; Fang, J.Y.; Elzoghby, A.O. Inhalable dual-targeted hybrid lipid nanocore-protein shell composites for combined delivery of genistein and all-trans retinoic acid to lung cancer cells. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 71–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kaur, P.; Garg, T.; Rath, G.; Murthy, R.S.; Goyal, A.K. Surfactant-based drug delivery systems for treating drug-resistant lung cancer. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Gagliardi, A.; Paolino, D.; Iannone, M.; Palma, E.; Fresta, M.; Cosco, D. Sodium deoxycholate-decorated zein nanoparticles for a stable colloidal drug delivery system. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Gagliardi, A.; Bonacci, S.; Paolino, D.; Celia, C.; Procopio, A.; Fresta, M.; Cosco, D. Paclitaxel-loaded sodium deoxycholate-stabilized zein nanoparticles: Characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity. Heliyon 2019, 5, 02422–02431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Liu, Q.; Kim, Y.J.; Im, G.B.; Zhu, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bhang, S.H. Inorganic nanoparticles applied as functional therapeutics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 31, 2008171–2008195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Elzoghby, A.O.; Hemasa, A.L.; Freag, M.S. Hybrid protein-inorganic nanoparticles: From tumor-targeted drug delivery to cancer imaging. J. Control. Release 2016, 243, 303–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bahmani, E.; Dizaji, B.F.; Talaei, S.; Koushkbaghi, S.; Yazdani, H.; Abadi, P.G.S.; Akrami, M.; Shahrousvand, M.; Jazi, F.S.; Irani, M. Fabrication of poly(ϵ-caprolactone)/paclitaxel (core)/chitosan/zein/multi-walled carbon nanotubes/doxorubicin (shell) nanofibers against MCF-7 breast cancer. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2022, 34, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g001 550
Figure 1. The rationale behind using zein-based nanocarriers for cancer therapy.
Figure 1. The rationale behind using zein-based nanocarriers for cancer therapy.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g001
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g002 550
Figure 2. The current role of zein-based nanocarriers for precise cancer therapy.
Figure 2. The current role of zein-based nanocarriers for precise cancer therapy.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g002
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g003 550
Figure 3. The loading drug process of zein by physical cross-linking.
Figure 3. The loading drug process of zein by physical cross-linking.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g003
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g004 550
Figure 4. The formation process of anticancer drug zein-based NPs via EISA.
Figure 4. The formation process of anticancer drug zein-based NPs via EISA.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g004
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) The anti-solvent self-assembly process of zein, (b) the ultrasonic dialysis process, (c) the self-assembly process in a supercritical fluid, (d) atomizing/antisolvent precipitation process, (e) microfluidic technology.
Figure 5. (a) The anti-solvent self-assembly process of zein, (b) the ultrasonic dialysis process, (c) the self-assembly process in a supercritical fluid, (d) atomizing/antisolvent precipitation process, (e) microfluidic technology.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g005
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) The preparation process of RES–ZPCs, reproduced with permission from [67], American Chemical Society, 2018. (b) The preparation process of lecithin- and dopamine-modified zein NPs, reproduced with permission from [25], Springer Nature, 2019.
Figure 6. (a) The preparation process of RES–ZPCs, reproduced with permission from [67], American Chemical Society, 2018. (b) The preparation process of lecithin- and dopamine-modified zein NPs, reproduced with permission from [25], Springer Nature, 2019.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g006
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) The zein NP modified with FA to enhance its delivery performance, reproduced with permission from [75], American Chemical Society, 2017. (b) The biodistribution of zein NP modified with folate, reproduced with permission from [17], Elsevier, 2017.
Figure 7. (a) The zein NP modified with FA to enhance its delivery performance, reproduced with permission from [75], American Chemical Society, 2017. (b) The biodistribution of zein NP modified with folate, reproduced with permission from [17], Elsevier, 2017.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g007
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g008 550
Figure 8. The preparation process of PTX–cRGD–Zein–Au@SiO2, reproduced with permission from [9], Elsevier, 2021.
Figure 8. The preparation process of PTX–cRGD–Zein–Au@SiO2, reproduced with permission from [9], Elsevier, 2021.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g008
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g009 550
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the preparation of CCM–PTX-α–zein cell membrane using co-extrusion technology, reproduced with permission from [7], Elsevier, 2023.
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the preparation of CCM–PTX-α–zein cell membrane using co-extrusion technology, reproduced with permission from [7], Elsevier, 2023.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g009
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g010 550
Figure 10. The preparation process of a magnetic zein-based nanocomplex, reproduced with permission from [105], Springer Nature, 2018.
Figure 10. The preparation process of a magnetic zein-based nanocomplex, reproduced with permission from [105], Springer Nature, 2018.
Pharmaceutics 15 01820 g010
Table
Table 1. Examples of various zein-based DDSs for cancer therapy.
Table 1. Examples of various zein-based DDSs for cancer therapy.
CarrierDrugLoading StrategyFormulationCharacterizationCancer CellAdministration RouteReference
hyaluronic acid–zeincurcuminPCLNanogelsin vitro/in vivoCT26, NIH3T3injection[31]
Zein–Lipoid-S75exemestane and resveratrolPCLNPsin vitro/in vivoMCF-7, 4T1oral gavage[32]
Phosphatidylcholine–zeinisoliquiritigeninEISANPsin vitro/in vivo4T1, MIHAoral gavage[36]
Pluronic–zeincurcuminASPNPsin vitroA549-[40]
AuNPS–zeinHCPTASPNPsin vitro/in vivoKB, Hela, A549injection[17]
Folate–zeindocetaxelASPNPsin vitroMCF-7, SKOV-3-[45]
PEG–zeincoumarin-6ASPNPsin vitroB16-F10-luc-G5-[50]
mPEG–zeincurcuminASPMicellesin vitro/in vivoNCI/ADR-RESinjection[55]
chondroitin sulfate–zeinetoposideASPMicellesin vitro/in vivoMCF-7injection[11]
Zein–lactoferrinrapamycin and wogoninASPMicellesin vitro/in vivoMCF-7injection[56]
mPEG–zeincurcuminASPMicellesin vitroHepG2-[57]
Pectin–zeinDOXPCLHydrogelsin vitroCervical cells-[27]
Zein–co-acrylic acid5-fluorouracil and rutinPCLHydrogelsin vitroMDA-MB-231, MCF-7-[58]
Zein–lecithincarvacrolASPNPsin vitroSW480-[59]
zeinDOXASPNPsin vitroHeLa-[60]
zeinmaytansineASPNPsin vitroA549-[61]
zein/hyaluronic acidhonokiolASPNPsin vitro/in vivo4T1injection[62]
Table
Table 2. Active targeting strategy of zein-based nanocarriers.
Table 2. Active targeting strategy of zein-based nanocarriers.
ClassLigandDrugTargetReference
Folic acidFolic acidHCPTFolate receptor[75]
TransferrinLactoferrinRapamycin and wolfsbaneLactoferrin receptor[76]
Peptides
Peptides		cRGDPTXIntegrin [9]
RVG29DactolisibNicotinic acetylcholine receptor[77]
Sugar residues
Sugar residues		Hyaluronic acidHonokiolCD44 receptor[62]
Chondroitin sulfateDOXCD44 receptor[78]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, W.; Yao, F.; Tian, S.; Liu, M.; Liu, G.; Jiang, Y. Recent Advances in Zein-Based Nanocarriers for Precise Cancer Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071820

AMA Style

Huang W, Yao F, Tian S, Liu M, Liu G, Jiang Y. Recent Advances in Zein-Based Nanocarriers for Precise Cancer Therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(7):1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071820

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Wenquan, Fei Yao, Shuangyan Tian, Mohao Liu, Guijin Liu, and Yanbin Jiang. 2023. "Recent Advances in Zein-Based Nanocarriers for Precise Cancer Therapy" Pharmaceutics 15, no. 7: 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071820

APA Style

Huang, W., Yao, F., Tian, S., Liu, M., Liu, G., & Jiang, Y. (2023). Recent Advances in Zein-Based Nanocarriers for Precise Cancer Therapy. Pharmaceutics, 15(7), 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071820

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop