Next Article in Journal
Advances in Research of Hydrogel Microneedle-Based Delivery Systems for Disease Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Newly Designed PCL-Wrapped Cryogel-Based Conduit Activated with IKVAV Peptide Derivative for Peripheral Nerve Repair
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Concomitant Inhibition and Collaring of Dual-Species Biofilms Formed by Candida auris and Staphylococcus aureus by Triazole Based Small Molecule Inhibitors

1
Organic and Medicinal Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
2
Advanced Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
4
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
5
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(12), 1570; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16121570
Submission received: 26 October 2024 / Revised: 4 December 2024 / Accepted: 5 December 2024 / Published: 8 December 2024

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Biofilm-associated infections, particularly those involving Candida auris and Staphylococcus aureus, pose significant challenges in clinical settings due to their resilience and resistance to conventional treatments. This study aimed to synthesize novel triazole derivatives containing a piperazine ring via click chemistry and evaluate their efficacy in disrupting biofilms formed by these pathogens. Methods: Triazole derivatives were synthesized using click chemistry techniques. The antimicrobial activity of the compounds was tested against planktonic cells of C. auris and S. aureus in single and dual-species culture conditions. Biofilm disruption efficacy was assessed, alongside the evaluation of physicochemical properties, oral bioavailability potential, and toxicity profiles. Results: The compound T3 demonstrated potent antimicrobial activity against planktonic cells of C. auris and S. aureus in both single and dual-species cultures. T3 exhibited significant efficacy in reducing microbial viability within biofilms formed by these pathogens. Physicochemical analyses revealed favorable solubility and permeability profiles, supporting its potential for oral bioavailability. Toxicity assessments showed a non-toxic profile, highlighting a promising safety margin for further development. Conclusions: This study underscores the anti-biofilm properties of novel triazole-piperazine derivatives, particularly T3, against single and dual-species biofilms of C. auris and S. aureus. These findings position T3 as a promising candidate for developing therapies targeting polymicrobial infections and provide a foundation for future research into alternative strategies for combating biofilm-associated infections.

1. Introduction

In healthcare settings worldwide, bacteria and fungi silently contribute to alarming patient mortality rates, posing significant challenges to infection management [1,2]. The rise in antibiotic resistance, coupled with the emergence of biofilms as formidable adversaries, has made the battle against infections increasingly complex [3,4]. Polymicrobial infections, caused by the interplay of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, present a multifaceted challenge that disrupts inflammation and immune responses, often leading to severe and unpredictable clinical outcomes [5]. The high resistance of these infections to antimicrobial drugs exacerbates the situation, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality rates [4,6,7].
Candida auris has emerged as a critical pathogen in this landscape, causing outbreaks globally and becoming notorious in healthcare settings [8]. Its formidable resistance to multiple drugs, coupled with frequent misidentification and an alarming ability to persist in hospital settings, has made C. auris a major concern [1,9]. Studies indicate that C. auris can linger on environmental surfaces, such as bedside tables and mattresses, and its biofilms demonstrate troubling resistance to common disinfectants like povidone iodine, chlorhexidine, and hydrogen peroxide [5]. C. auris biofilms are characterized by unique clustering behavior and exhibit resilience greater than that of biofilms formed by Candida albicans and Candida glabrata [5,10]. Furthermore, C. auris interacts with other skin microbiota, including Staphylococcus species, which have their own colonization strategies. Staphylococcus species thrive by exploiting skin urea and producing proteases to access nutrients, often overshadowing other skin flora, with Staphylococcus aureus being a prominent offender in wound infections [11,12]. C. albicans is well-documented for its interactions with skin bacteria, leading to enhanced biofilm formation and increased pathogenicity due to elevated production of adhesins and extracellular enzymes [13,14]. Similarly, C. auris is known for its ability to adhere to both biotic and abiotic surfaces, forming biofilms resistant to conventional treatments, including caspofungin, which is typically effective against Candida biofilms [10]. Previous research has highlighted the protective role of the C. albicans extracellular matrix in shielding S. aureus from vancomycin [15]. Recent studies have investigated dual-species biofilms of C. auris and S. aureus or S. epidermidis, examining their impact on resistance to common antiseptics [16]. Although data on C. auris interactions with other microbiota remain limited, it is plausible that C. auris interacts with S. aureus, potentially exacerbating virulence, and complicating treatment regimens.
Considering the escalating threat of biofilm-related infections, developing innovative treatment strategies is essential. Disrupting or eradicating biofilms is crucial to overcoming the resilience of microbial communities. Among the various strategies that are being pursued [17,18,19,20,21,22], a promising approaches is the development of small molecule inhibitors designed to penetrate biofilms and eliminate embedded microbes [3,23,24,25,26]. Triazole ring-containing compounds have demonstrated significant antimicrobial properties, particularly against fungi [27,28,29]. Key antifungal drugs such as fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, and Posaconazole derive their efficacy from the triazole ring structure. Additionally, piperazine, a versatile scaffold found in multiple generations of antibiotics, offers unique advantages in enhancing physicochemical properties, including solubility and permeability [30,31]. As illustrated in Figure 1, incorporating a piperazine ring significantly alters the pKa of a molecule, optimizing its pharmacokinetic profile and improving its water solubility. By leveraging the synergistic benefits of piperazine and triazole through advanced click chemistry techniques and in continuation of our work on the development of new small molecule antimicrobial agents [32,33,34], we have synthesized novel triazole derivatives featuring a piperazine ring. This study focuses on assessing the efficacy of these compounds in disrupting biofilms while also evaluating their physicochemical properties and toxicity profiles. Our goal is to advance our arsenal against resilient biofilm infections. This innovative approach holds promise for creating more effective treatments and improving patient outcomes in the ongoing fight against biofilm-associated infections.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemistry

The chemical reagents and solvents were procured from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). TLC plates used were precoated aluminum sheets (silica gel 60 F254, Merck Germany) and visualization was conducted by UV light in a UV cabinet. Heraeus Vario EL III analyser (Hanau, Germany) was used for elemental analysis. Bruker ALPHA FT-IR spectrometer (Eco-ATR, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used for FTIR analysis. Bruker AVANCE 400 spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) (400 MHz) was used for 1H and 13C NMR spectra using DMSO-d6/CDCl3 as solvent with TMS (Tetramethylsilane) as standard. ESI-MS positive ion mode was recorded on Micromass Quattro II triple quadrapole mass spectrometer (Manchester, UK).

2.1.1. Click Synthesis of 2-(4-((4-(2-Fluorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetyl Chloride (3)

Compound 3 (2-(4-((4-(2-fluorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetyl chloride) was obtained through a click chemistry reaction of (1-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)-1H-indole) with 2-azidoacetyl chloride in equimolar ratio in DMF. 1-(2-fluorophenyl)-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)piperazine (2) in turn was obtained by treating 1-(2-fluorophenyl)piperazine (1) (1 g, 8.53 mmol) in dry acetone with propargyl bromide dropwise (0.65 mL, 8.53 mmol) at room temperature, resulting in precipitation of the product in acetone in no time as discussed previously [32]. The product was filtered, washed, dried, and used as such in the next reaction.

2.1.2. Synthesis of Quinoline Based 1,2,3-Triazole Derivatives (T1–T12)

The target derivatives (T1–T12) were synthesized following a straightforward synthetic route as shown in Scheme 1 following our previously published protocol [32]. Briefly, compound 3 on treatment with different amines in DMF using HATU/DIPEA at 60 °C resulted the formation of target derivatives (T1–T12). Minimum amount of DMF (5–10 mL) was used as a solvent and the crude compounds were obtained by vacuum evaporating any excess DMF and precipitation in water. The crude compounds were recrystallized twice in dichloromethane: methanol solvent mixture. The physical and spectroscopic characterization data of all the derivatives (T1–T12) is given in the Supporting Information.

2.2. Pharmacokinetic Studies/ADMET Profile

Pharmacokinetic and ADMET properties were assessed using pkCSM, an online resource (https://biosig.lab.uq.edu.au/pkcsm/ accessed on 1 July 2024) provided by Cambridge University to evaluate the drug-like potential of the freshly prepared compounds [35]. Additionally, ADMETLab 3.0 (https://admetlab3.scbdd.com/, accessed on 1 July 2024) [36] and SwissADME SwissADME (http://www.swissadme.ch/, accessed on 1 July 2024) [37], an online tool from Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics were used to validate the results. ProTox-3.0 online web tool (https://tox.charite.de/protox3/, accessed on 5 July 2024) was employed to evaluate the toxicity profiles of the most potent derivative T3 along with the reference drug Fluconazole [38]. Additionally, CytoSafe (http://cytosafe.labmol.com.br/, accessed on 5 July 2024) and BeeToxAI (https://beetoxai.labmol.com.br/, accessed on 5 July 2024) which are advanced machine learning based QSAR tools designed by LabMol (http://www.labmol.com.br/, Accessed on 5 July 2024) to predict the acute toxicity of chemicals were used to predict the toxicity of the compounds.

2.3. Biological Studies

2.3.1. Fungal and Bacterial Strains Used in Study

Candida auris MRL6057 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213 were stored as glycerol stock at −80 °C. C. auris MRL6057 and S. aureus ATCC29213 were revived on sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Luria Bertoni (LB; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) agar plates, respectively. C. auris MRL6057 was incubated at 35 ± 2 °C for 48 h, whereas S. aureus was grown at 35 ± 2 °C for 24 h. Single colonies of C. auris MRL6057 and S. aureus ATCC29213 were picked up from the freshy streaked plates and inoculated in 10 mL Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and LB broth medium, respectively, and incubated in an incubator shaker at 35 ± 2 °C, 200 rpm for 18 h. Thereafter, the cultures were precipitated and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and further adjusted to a concentration of 0.5 McFarland standard (C. auris, 1 × 106 cells/mL; S. aureus, 1 × 108 cells/mL) using turbidimeter. Prior to experiment the pathogens were diluted to assay-specific concentration in the required media.

2.3.2. Antifungal and Antibacterial Activity Against Individual Pathogen

To prepare the yeast inoculum, the isolates grown on SDA at 37 °C for 24 h were set at a final concentration of about 0.5–2.5 × 103 cells/mL in the sterile saline. The antimicrobial activity of the compounds T1–T12 against individual pathogens (C. auris MRL6057 and S. aureus ATCC29213) was determined in terms of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the protocol was adopted from Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [39,40]. A stock solution (10 mg/mL) was prepared in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and the concentration range tested against the individual as well as mixed pathogens was 2500–1.22 µg/mL; experiment was conducted in a 96—well microtiter plate (flat bottom). The included controls were amphotericin B (positive control for yeast), azithromycin (positive control for bacteria), cells growing in presence of 1% DMSO (negative control) and cell free (sterility) controls. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the compound that resulted in the inhibition of visible growth of both test microbes. The results were calculated as a median of three independent experiments.
To verify the microbicidal activity of T3, 20 µL was taken from each well exceeding the MIC, plated onto SDA, and incubated for 24 h at 35 ± 2 °C. The minimum fungicidal/bactericidal concentration (MFC/MBC) was defined as the lowest concentration that resulted in no visible microbial growth on the agar plates [41].

2.3.3. Antifungal and Antibacterial Activity Against Mixed Pathogen

In the quest of discovering a potent antimicrobial agent that can act against yeast as well as bacteria under mixed culture conditions, we evaluated antimicrobial activity of the compounds against mixed culture condition (C. auris MRL6057 + S. aureus ATCC29213) [42]. Concisely, a 100 µL aliquot of each compound (T1–T12) was combined with 50 µL of yeast and 50 µL of bacterial inoculum in a 96-well microtiter plate and incubated at 35 ± 2 °C for 24 h. MICs were determined as described, followed by MFC/MBC calculations for mixed cultures.

2.3.4. Anti-Biofilm Activity Against Single—And Mixed Biofilms

Compound T3 showed very promising antimicrobial activity against individual as well as mixed culture condition and therefore, it was taken forward for advance study. The inhibitory activity of T3 against single or dual species biofilm was measured at two different time points—biofilm formation and 24 h mature biofilms. The protocol was adopted from previous work [16] with modification. The yeast and bacterial inoculum were prepared at 1 × 10⁶ CFU/mL in RPMI 1640-MOPS, buffered with 0.165 M 3-(N-morpholino)propane sulfonic acid (RPMI). The single species biofilm was established in a 96-well polystyrene flat-bottomed microplate by addition of 100 µL aliquot of single microorganism in the wells containing 100 µL of medium, whereas the dual—species biofilm was formed by dispensing 100 µL of C. auris and 100 µL S. aureus together in the same well. The microtiter plate was incubated at 35 ± 2 °C with gentle shaking (100 rpm) for 90 min to allow cell adhesion. Unattached cells were then removed by washing the wells with PBS, followed by the addition of 100 µL of RPMI to each well. The plates were further incubated at 35 ± 2 °C with shaking (100 rpm) for 24 h to promote biofilm formation. Negative controls (T3-free) and sterility controls were included in the experiment. To evaluate the anti-biofilm activity, 100 µL of the respective medium containing T3 was added to designated wells after the adhesion phase, and plates were incubated under biofilm-forming conditions.
A parallel experiment was conducted to assess the anti-biofilm activity of the test compound on mature biofilms. The biofilms were initially incubated for 24 h, after which non-adherent cells were removed. The remaining sessile cells were then treated with T3 and incubated for another 24 h at 35 ± 2 °C with shaking at 100 rpm. Furthermore, to evaluate the anti-biofilm activity of T3, the metabolic activity of biofilms was checked by using XTT reduction assay by using the protocol published previously [43]. The percent inhibition for single and dual—species biofilms was calculated by using below formula and the minimum dosage were there more than 90% inhibition was recorded was termed as BIC90. The experiment was performed in duplicates and was repeated three times.
P e r c e n t   i n h i b i t i o n = 100 ( t r e a t e d   O . D . × 100 / u n t r e a t e d   O . D . )

2.3.5. Impact on Microbial Viability

The effect on fungal and bacterial cell viability in single and dual—species biofilms was determined by calculating colony forming units (CFU/mL) [43]. Briefly, following T3 treatment, the attached biofilms were rinsed twice with PBS, scraped, and plated onto SDA plates containing 50 µg/mL chloramphenicol for C. auris growth and Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) supplemented with amphotericin B for S. aureus growth. The plates were incubated at 35 ± 2 °C for 24 h and colonies were counted on a colony counter and the mean log CFU/mL value was calculate [43].

2.3.6. Impact on Total Biomass Quantification

The effect of T3 on the total biomass (extracellular polymeric matrix (EPM) + sessile cells) was determined quantitatively by violet crystal (VC) staining method [43]. Concisely, after the incubation time was over the biofilms were gently washed with methanol and stained with VC (0.1%) for 15 min. Later, the well was again washed with PBS and air dried for some time. The quantification was performed by adding 33% glacial acetic acid to all the wells, and the optical density (O.D.) was measured at 590 nm using a SpectraMax iD3 multi-mode microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).
Additionally, a preliminary assay was conducted to visualize the effect of T3 on preformed biofilms. The biofilms were grown on coverslips, treated with T3 following the standard protocol, and then stained with 0.4% VC for 10 min. After washing away the excess stain and air drying the coverslips, the biofilms were examined under a Leica DM 500 light microscope, and images were captured using an attached digital camera.

2.3.7. T3 Extricates Dual—Species Biofilms Formed by C. auris and S. aureus

The anti-biofilm nature of T3 against 24 h mature single and dual—species biofilms was confirmed with the help of confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; Carl Zeiss, Inc., White Plains, NY, USA) by using the method was described elsewhere [41]. Single and dual-species biofilms were grown on glass coverslips in 24-well microtiter plates under standard biofilm-forming conditions. After 24 h of treatment, mature biofilms were stained with the fluorescent dye FUN-1 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, ZA, Waltham, MA, USA; excitation at 543 nm and emission at 560 nm) and the Concanavalin A (ConA)-Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, ZA; excitation at 488 nm and emission at 505 nm). Following incubation, the stained coverslips were examined using a Zeiss Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope (LSM) 780 with Airyscan (Carl Zeiss, Inc.). Confocal images of the red (FUN-1) and green (ConA) fluorescence were captured simultaneously in multitrack mode.

2.3.8. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

SEM was used to further advocated the biofilm inhibitory potential of T3 against mature biofilm formed by single and dual—species. As described in previous section, 24 h mature single and dual—species biofilm was formed and treated with T3, also the negative control was taken into consideration. The biofilm was fixed with 5% glutaraldehyde and gradually dehydrated using increasing concentrations of ethanol (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%). It was then immersed in hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) and left to dry overnight at room temperature. The coverslips were mounted onto aluminum stubs, carbon-coated, and examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM; Zeiss Gemini 2 Crossbeam 540 FEG SEM).

2.3.9. Hemolytic Assay for T3

The hemolytic activity was assessed following a previously described protocol [44]. Briefly, horse blood suspension was treated with T3 at concentrations of 0.25× MIC, 0.5× MIC, MIC, and 2× MIC for 24 h at 37 °C. The samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube. The absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 450 nm. The blood suspension treated with Triton X-100 (1%) and sterile PBS was used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The following equation was applied to calculate the percentage of hemolysis:
%   h a e m o l y s i s = A 450   o f   t e s t   c o m p o u n d   t r e a t e d   s a m p l e A 450   o f   b u f f e r   t r e a t e d   s a m p l e A 450   o f   1 % T r i t o n   X 100   t r e a t e d   s a m p l e A 450   o f   b u f f e r   t r e a t e d   s a m p l e × 100 %

2.3.10. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and the results were analyzed using Student’s t-test with GraphPad Prism version 9.1.0. A p-value of ≤0.01 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemistry

The synthesis pathway for the target derivatives (T1–T12) is depicted in Scheme 1. The key compound, 3 (2-(4-((4-(2-fluorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetyl chloride), was synthesized through a Copper-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction. This involved the reaction of 1-(2-fluorophenyl)-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)piperazine with 2-azidoacetyl chloride in a 1:1 molar ratio in DMF, which is known for its ability to facilitate efficient cycloaddition reactions. The precursor, 1-(2-fluorophenyl)-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)piperazine (2), was synthesized by reacting 1-(2-fluorophenyl)piperazine (1) with propargyl bromide.
The target derivatives (T1–T12) were subsequently synthesized via amide coupling reactions between various substituted phenylamines and the acyl group of the triazole derivative (3). The yields of these reactions ranged from 80% to 85%, demonstrating the efficiency of the synthetic strategy employed. The use of click chemistry, particularly the CuAAC method, is recognized for its reliability and eco-friendliness, allowing for high yields and purity of 1,2,3-triazole derivatives, which are highly regarded in medicinal chemistry for their diverse biological activities [45,46]. The structures of all synthesized derivatives were confirmed using a range of physical and spectroscopic techniques. The structure of the triazole (3) was validated through elemental analysis, FTIR, 1H NMR, 13CNMR, and ESI MS. Notably, the FTIR spectrum exhibited characteristic stretching bands at 3185 cm−1 (C-H triazole), 3087 cm−1 (C-H, Ar), and 1725 cm−1 (C=O), confirming the presence of functional groups indicative of the triazole derivative. Importantly, the absence of azide (N≡N at 2100–2160 cm−1) and alkyne (2100–2140 cm−1) stretching bands confirmed the successful cyclization of 1-(2-fluorophenyl)-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)piperazine with 2-azidoacetyl chloride.
The formation of the triazole ring was further corroborated by the characteristic absorption band in the FTIR spectrum between 3185 and 3180 cm−1, corresponding to the =C-H stretching of the triazole ring in the target derivatives. In the 1H NMR spectrum, a singlet peak at δ 7.76–7.78 ppm (1H, s, triazole ring) and the disappearance of the terminal acetylene proton signal in the aliphatic region further substantiated the presence of the triazole moiety. The 13C NMR spectrum showed peaks at δ 143.8 and 123.3 ppm, corresponding to the carbon atoms in the triazole ring, thereby confirming the structure of compound 3. Additionally, the positive ion mass spectrum displayed a peak at m/z 338.11 [M + H]+, providing further structural confirmation. The structures of the target compounds (T1–T12) were established similarly. The formation of the amide bonds in these derivatives was confirmed by characteristic stretching frequencies for C=O and N-H (amide I and amide II bands) observed in the FTIR spectra, which are typical for secondary amides. The consistency of the 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and ESI MS spectra with the proposed structures of the newly synthesized molecules was detailed in the experimental section and Supporting Information.

3.2. Physicochemical Properties

3.2.1. Pharmacokinetic Studies/ADMET Profile

In drug discovery, understanding the physicochemical properties of molecules is critical for determining their potential as effective therapeutics. These properties influence key aspects such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET), making their comprehensive evaluation critical for assessing drug-like characteristics. In this study, we conducted a thorough evaluation of the pharmacokinetic and ADMET properties using a combination of advanced tools like pkCSM (https://biosig.lab.uq.edu.au/pkcsm/, accessed on 1 July 2024) [35], ADMETLab 3.0 (https://admetlab3.scbdd.com/, accessed on 1 July 2024) [36], and SwissADME (http://www.swissadme.ch/, accessed on 1 July 2024) [37], each providing highly accurate and validated predictions. The analysis demonstrated that all molecules under investigation exhibited promising solubility, both in water (log S ranging from −3.33 to −4.26 mol/L) and in terms of Caco-2 cell permeability (log Papp between 1.25 and 0.96 cm/s × 10) (see Table S1). These findings are crucial because water solubility directly impacts drug absorption, and permeability through Caco-2 cells serves as a model for predicting intestinal absorption. Moreover, the intrinsic water solubility (log S0) values, which are pH-independent and critical for absorption, ranged from −4.53 to −3.54, indicating that these molecules maintain favorable solubility in their uncharged states. Further analysis revealed additional advantageous pharmacokinetic characteristics, including high intestinal absorption (~81–92% in humans) and favorable skin permeability (log Kp~−2.78–2.99). The ability of the molecules to cross the blood–brain barrier (log BB ranging from 0.02 to 0.99) and permeate the central nervous system (log PS~−2.39–2.82) underscores their potential for targeting tissues beyond peripheral organs. The clearance rates, ranging from 0.30 to 0.61 mL/min/kg, suggest efficient elimination from the body, reducing the risk of accumulation and related toxicity concerns.
Toxicological assessments further confirmed the safety profiles of the compounds. The oral rat acute toxicity (LD50) ranged between 2.45 and 2.88 mol/kg, while chronic toxicity (LOAEL) was observed between 0.86 and 1.52 mg/kg/day. The estimated maximum tolerated dose in humans was between −0.08 and 0.28 mg/kg/day, reflecting a wide safety margin. Additionally, these compounds exhibited non-hepatotoxic and non-toxic profiles, indicating a reduced risk of adverse effects. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the molecules possess a favorable ADMET profile, which is vital for exhibiting drug-like properties. Building on these insights, we further scrutinized the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the molecules against Lipinski’s Rule of Five, a widely accepted benchmark for evaluating drug-likeness in early-stage drug discovery (Table 1). Lipinski’s rule highlights the significance of key physicochemical parameters—such as hydrogen bond acceptors and donors, lipophilicity (log P), and molecular weight—in predicting oral bioavailability. Adherence to these guidelines is essential for identifying compounds with a higher probability of successful oral delivery, thus optimizing the drug development process.
While Lipinski’s Rule of Five is not an infallible predictor of success of a drug, it serves as a critical framework for prioritizing molecules with the optimal characteristics for oral administration [47]. Compounds that do not meet these criteria often face substantial challenges in terms of bioavailability and pharmacokinetics during later stages of development. In this study, all the investigated molecules adhered to Lipinski’s rule, further reinforcing their drug-like properties. These molecules not only exhibited favorable solubility, permeability, and ADMET profiles but also aligned with the physicochemical constraints essential for oral bioavailability. This strong correlation with pharmacokinetic and physicochemical parameters underscores their potential as promising candidates for further investigation and development.

3.2.2. Bioavailability

Building upon our pharmacokinetic evaluation, we employed the SwissADME bioavailability radar tool to gain deeper insights into the drug-like potential of our molecules. Notably, T3 emerged as a candidate with particularly favorable physicochemical properties, indicative of enhanced oral bioavailability. The bioavailability radar plot for T3 illustrated that key parameters fell within the optimal “pink area”, which signifies the desirable range for six critical physicochemical properties: flexibility, lipophilicity, solubility, polarity, molecular size, and saturation (see Supporting Information Figure S1). These parameters are pivotal in determining the suitability of a compound for oral administration [48]. For a molecule to be classified as drug-like, its radar plot must fully align with this pink area, indicating that each physicochemical property meets the preferred criteria. Specifically, the properties include a topological polar surface area (TPSA) ranging from 20 to 130 Å2, solubility (log S) not exceeding −6, molecular weight (MW) between 150 and 500 g/mol, a maximum of nine rotatable bonds (to indicate flexibility), a fraction of carbons in sp3 hybridization (saturation) of at least 0.25, and a lipophilicity (XLOGP3) value between −0.7 and +5.0. Molecules that fulfill these criteria are more likely to exhibit enhanced oral bioavailability, a crucial factor in successful drug development.
To further substantiate these findings, we conducted a rigorous analysis of the physicochemical properties of all compounds, including T3 and the reference antifungal drug Fluconazole, using ADMETLab 3.0. This extensive evaluation encompassed 21 physicochemical properties, 19 medicinal chemistry parameters, 34 ADME endpoints, 36 toxicity endpoints, and 8 toxicophore rules. The results confirmed that all derivatives, possess optimal characteristics essential for drug-like behavior and efficient bioavailability (see Supporting Information, Figure S2). Also, as depicted in Figure 2, the parameters for T3 and the reference drug fall well within the desired ranges, reinforcing their potential as viable drug candidates. Notably, the alignment of the physicochemical profile of T3 with established criteria not only enhances its viability for further development but also highlights its promise in addressing therapeutic needs. The favorable predictions from both the SwissADME bioavailability radar and ADMETLab assessments underscore the importance of meticulous evaluation of physicochemical properties in the drug discovery process, as they form the backbone of effective pharmacokinetics and safety profiles.

3.2.3. Toxicity Analysis and Safety Profiling

The toxicity profiles of the most potent derivative, T3, and the reference drug, Fluconazole, were comprehensively evaluated using the ProTox-3.0 web tool [38]. Toxicity classifications followed the globally harmonized system for chemical labeling and classification. Both compounds were categorized as Class 4, with a calculated lethal dose (LD50) of >500 mg/kg, confirming their non-toxic to low-toxic nature (LD50 values ranging from 500 to 1271 mg/kg). This classification indicates a relatively low risk of acute toxicity, suggesting minimal harm even at higher doses (see Supporting Information Figure S3). ProTox-II further provided detailed toxicity assessments for hepatotoxicity, cytotoxicity, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, immunotoxicity, nuclear receptor signaling pathways, and stress response pathways (see Supporting Information Figure S5 and Table S2). Strikingly, both compounds exhibited a high probability of being inactive across most toxicological endpoints, though notable exceptions emerged. The derivative T3 demonstrated a potential risk of neurotoxicity, while Fluconazole exhibited a broader toxicity profile, showing predictions for hepatotoxicity, mutagenicity, and neurotoxicity, with probabilities ranging from 0.59% to 0.91%. Additionally, T3 showed a 69% probability of influencing mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), a critical parameter in cellular function, whereas Fluconazole did not. However, Fluconazole demonstrated a significant 92.1% probability of interacting with the Aryl hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR), which could indicate potential long-term toxicological concerns.
To enhance the robustness of the toxicity predictions, BeeToxAI and CytoSafe tools were employed to provide additional safety insights. BeeToxAI, a machine-learning-based QSAR tool, predicted the acute toxicity of these compounds in honeybees, while CytoSafe focused on cytotoxicity, identifying toxicophores, which are the key structural features responsible for toxicity (see Supporting Information Figure S4). The results indicated that T3 is non-toxic with a probability of 78–85%, while fluconazole showed a higher non-toxicity prediction, ranging from 94 to 99% (Figure 3). One of the most impactful aspects of the CytoSafe analysis was the use of explainable AI (XAI) heatmaps and molecular diagrams. This advanced visualization technique offered a scientifically rigorous, yet intuitive, way to understand the contributions of individual atoms and their interactions to cytotoxicity across 3T3 Binary and HEK-293 cell lines. By leveraging Morgan Fingerprints, the XAI Molecular Diagram quantified the influence of each atom, mapped on a gradient from green (toxicity-reducing) to red (toxicity-enhancing), revealing key toxicophores within the molecular structures (see Figure 3). This dual visualization approach not only identified toxicity drivers but also provided a molecular context, allowing for targeted optimization of the derivative’s structure to mitigate potential toxic effects. These results, supported by multiple advanced toxicity prediction tools, provide a comprehensive understanding of the safety profiles of T3 and Fluconazole. The insights from XAI and molecular fingerprinting underscore the importance of structural features in driving toxicity, which could guide further refinement of T3 for enhanced therapeutic safety.

3.3. Biology

3.3.1. Candidicidal and Bactericidal Activity of the Compounds T1–T12

The compounds T1–T12 demonstrated strong inhibitory activity against the free microbial cells of C. auris and S. aureus, both in single and dual-species culture environments. The MIC and MFC values are provided in Table 2.
Out of twelve tested compounds T3 at a very low concentration was active against individual pathogens and additionally at the same concentration T3 impacted the survival of pathogens under mixed condition. However, when compared to the single—species the mixed culture displayed higher MIC values against the investigated drugs and the present finding agree with a previous study [49].
Yeast and bacteria are often co-isolated in healthcare settings, with more than 20% of bloodstream infections caused by C. albicans in immunocompromised patients being polymicrobial, with S. epidermidis and S. aureus as the most frequently isolated pathogens [50]. Although the interactions between C. auris and other bacterial pathogens remain understudied, both are well known for their ability to form biofilms, both inside the host and on abiotic medical devices. Therefore, assessing the growth and survival of these pathogens in a polymicrobial environment is critical for developing effective treatment strategies to combat dual-species infections. In this study, we investigated the effect of T3 on the planktonic growth and biofilm formation of C. auris and S. aureus under single and dual-species conditions.

3.3.2. T3 Prohibited Biofilm Formation and Smashed Mature Biofilm Formed by Single and Dual—Species

The biofilm inhibitory effect of T3 was assessed by measuring the reduced metabolic activity of cells embedded in single and dual-species biofilms, as compared to the control, using the XTT reduction assay (Figure 4). Notably, a significant reduction in biofilm formation by C. auris and S. aureus, both individually and in combination, was observed. Moreover, T3 exhibited a strong impact on disrupting 24 h preformed biofilms when compared to the control. The inhibitory effect of T3 on biofilm formation and preformed biofilms varied between single- and dual-species biofilms. The results indicated that the 24 h mature biofilm formed by C. auris and S. aureus showed the highest tolerance to T3; however, the compound was still effective in eradicating the 24 h mature biofilm compared to the control (Table 3).
The collaboration between yeast and bacteria results in elevated antimicrobial tolerance level [13,15,51] and therefore, the polymicrobial infections are associated with higher mortality rates contrary to their mono-microbial condition [13]. Although, the interaction between C. auris and other microbes are not explored in detail, but the ability of C. albicans and S. aureus to form biofilms both individually as well as in mixed conditions has been well documented. Previous research has highlighted similar interactions between Candida and Staphylococcus species [52,53,54], prompting us to explore the in vitro interactions between C. auris and S. aureus under biofilm-forming conditions. Additionally, we assessed the anti-biofilm activity of T3 against these pathogens in both single-species and mixed-species environments. It is well-established that the collaboration between yeast and bacteria in biofilms is synergistic, enhancing each other’s growth and promoting the upregulation of various pathogenic traits, including drug resistance [52]. Targeting the interkingdom interactions and disrupting biofilm formation could provide an effective strategy to mitigate the issues associated with mixed biofilms. Our results indicated that T3, at its half MIC (19.53 µg/mL), effectively inhibited biofilm formation, while at 4 × MIC (156.25 µg/mL), it was successful in eradicating mature biofilms formed by the dual-pathogen species. This characteristic offers T3 a significant advantage over conventional antimicrobials, which often have a limited spectrum of activity and are commonly linked to the development of drug resistance.

3.3.3. T3 Impact over Cellular Viability of Pathogens in Single and Dual—Species Biofilm

Although XTT method is considered a gold standard assay and being widely used by researchers for detecting the antibiofilm potency of antimicrobial compounds [55,56], in present investigation, we also considered log CFU/mL as an additional parameter to authenticate the viability of yeast and bacterial cells from single and dual—species biofilms. Moreover, log CFU counts helps in establishing a quantitative foundation for the presence of viable cell in the biofilms and have been quite regularly used in studies related to mixed biofilms [57,58]. According to the data recorded, the log CFU/mL agreed with the XTT assay and also suggested that T3 is definitely having anti-biofilm property, and its activity is directly related on the dislodging of biofilms and not killing the cells present in the biofilms. T3 exhibited a concentration-dependent inhibition of both biofilm formation and preformed biofilms in single and dual-species cultures, with a significant reduction in log CFU counts observed as the concentration of the compound increased (Figure 5). To further investigate the mode of antimicrobial action of T3 on the biofilm structure, we performed CLSM and SEM analyses.

3.3.4. T3 Drastically Effects Total Biomass in Single and Dual—Species Biofilm

T3 significantly lowered the amount of total biomass formed in both single and mixed culture biofilms (Figure 6). The obtained results advocated that T3 not only inhibited the growth and viability of biofilm under mixed condition it also impaired the 24 h preformed biofilm attached to the substratum and therefore, created an adverse environment for the propagation of C. auris and S. aureus both individually and in mixed environment. However, the 24 h biofilm was found to be more tolerant to the test compound as compared to the biofilm in the forming stage. Moreover, the data captured further clarified that there was around 82% and 71% inhibition in total biomass of 24 h mature biofilm formed by the dual—species suggesting the raising tolerance of mature biofilm compared to the newly formed biofilms. The anti-biofilm activity of T3 against both single and dual-species biofilms further highlights its potential as an effective anti-biofilm agent. Its ability to target polymicrobial biofilms may reduce the likelihood of resistance development in C. auris and S. aureus, particularly when compared to commonly used antibiotics. Additionally, light microscopy images of the biofilms revealed a significant reduction in biofilm biomass, with very few cells remaining adhered to the coverslip (Figure 7). This characteristic of T3 is particularly valuable in clinical settings, as biofilm-associated infections caused by C. auris and S. aureus are notoriously difficult to treat.

3.3.5. Con-A and FUN-1 Staining Further Confirmed the Anti-Biofilms Property of T3

To further validate the ability of T3 to inhibit biofilm formation and disrupt 24 h mature biofilms formed by C. auris and S. aureus, we stained the biofilms with a combination of fluorescent dyes: FUN-1 (a cytoplasmic probe for assessing cell viability) and Con-A (which specifically binds to cell wall polysaccharides). These staining agents have been previously used to examine the viability of cells within biofilms [41]. Bright green fluorescence indicated the incorporation of Con-A into the cell wall polysaccharides in the dual-species biofilms, while red fluorescence revealed the integration of FUN-1 in the metabolically active yeast and bacterial cells. Concisely, the sections of the slide fluorescing orange-red in the multi-channel mode represented the presence of metabolically active bacterial and yeast cells, contrary to this, the section showed bright green fluorescence depicts the presence of biofilm matrix and those sections that were yellow-green in color represented the presence of dead cells (as FUN-1 remained confined to the cytosol) [41]. Herein the results are represented as untreated dual—species biofilm control (Figure 8A), exposure of T3 during biofilm formation (Figure 8B) and exposure of T3 on 24 h mature biofilm (Figure 8C). The micrographs obtained for untreated dual—specie biofilms were having dense and compact biofilm architecture which when observed under multichannel mode can gave a bright red-green fluorescence throughout the slide. In contrast, the treated samples exhibited a significantly different outcome. In the presence of the BIC90 concentration of T3, there was a noticeable reduction in both biofilm density and live cell counts, with more yellow-green fluorescence observed, indicating an increase in non-viable cells (Figure 8B,C). Furthermore, the damage was more pronounced in the biofilm formation samples compared to the 24 h mature biofilms formed under dual-species conditions. In the treated biofilm formation samples, cellular size was reduced, clear depressions were observed, and the faded red fluorescence further confirmed the non-viability of both yeast and bacterial cells in the dual-species biofilms. These findings support our previous results, reinforcing the anti-biofilm efficacy of T3 against the critical dual-species biofilms.

3.3.6. SEM for Structural Analysis of Dual—Species Biofilms upon Treatment with T3

The three—dimensional structure of cells embedded in dual—specie biofilms were observed both in untreated and treated conditions (Figure 9). The untreated 24 h preformed biofilms were intact, dense and had a complex network of yeast and bacterial cells making it impenetrable (Figure 9A). On the other hand, the view of treated 24 h mature biofilms were solely different, distorted and wrinkled bacterial and yeast cells were observed at BIC90 of T3 (Figure 9B).
SEM analysis provided valuable insights into the effect of T3 on the morphology of cells in dual-species biofilms, highlighting significant differences between treated and untreated biofilms. Previous studies have shown a synergistic interaction between C. albicans and S. aureus in polymicrobial biofilms [59], which aligns with the observed behavior of C. auris and S. aureus in mixed biofilm conditions. In our study, untreated dual-species biofilms displayed a substantial amount of extracellular matrix, which is commonly associated with increased antimicrobial resistance in polymicrobial cultures. Similar findings have been reported in recent research, where enhanced biofilm matrix production in mixed biofilms contributed to elevated drug resistance [60]. In contrast, treatment with T3 disrupted cell morphology, reduced the biofilm matrix, and allowed better penetration of the compound into the bacterial and yeast cells embedded in the biofilm, leading to the eradication of the mixed biofilm.

3.3.7. Cytotoxicity

Hemolysis is a critical test to assess the safety profile of drugs. To evaluate the safety of T3, its potential to induce hemolysis was tested using horse red blood cells (RBC). For comparison, PBS and Triton X-100 were used as negative and positive controls, representing 0% and 100% hemolysis, respectively. T3 at a concentration of 4.88 μg/mL showed no hemolytic activity against erythrocytes. At higher concentrations, hemolysis ranged from 1.6% to 19.07% (Figure 10). These results demonstrate the low cytotoxicity of T3, supporting its potential for use in in vivo studies.

3.3.8. Cytotoxicity of T3 Against RAW 264.7 Cells

In addition to the demonstrated potent antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties of T3 in previous studies, it was essential to establish its cytotoxicity profile to ensure its safety for subsequent in vivo evaluations. The MTT assay, a widely used and reliable method for assessing cell viability and cytotoxicity, was employed to evaluate the impact of varying concentrations of T3 on mammalian RAW 264.7 macrophage cells.
The results revealed that T3 exhibited a minimal cytotoxic effect on RAW 264.7 cells, with a dose-dependent response observed (Figure 11). Specifically, at the highest tested concentration of 312.32 µg/mL, the average cytotoxicity was measured at 8.06%, indicating that over 90% of the cell population remained viable under these conditions (Figure 11). These findings suggest that T3 exerts a shallow level of cytotoxicity, even at relatively high concentrations, which is a critical consideration for its potential therapeutic application.
The low cytotoxicity observed aligns with the requirements for compounds intended for in vivo applications, as it ensures minimal off-target effects on mammalian cells. Based on these results, T3 meets the preliminary safety criteria and is a strong candidate for advancing to the next stage of evaluation in in vivo models.

4. Conclusions

Candida auris is a frequently isolated yeast pathogen found on the skin of both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals, and it has the capacity to interact with bacterial species, such as Staphylococcus aureus, in the same ecological niche. Our study confirms this interaction, leading to the formation of robust dual-species biofilms. Among the tested compounds, T3 emerged as the most effective against planktonic cells of both C. auris and S. aureus, in both single and dual-species culture conditions. T3 significantly disrupted biofilm formation and reduced microbial viability within these biofilms. Notably, the physicochemical analysis of T3 revealed favorable bioavailability and permeability properties, which further highlight its therapeutic potential. This study is one of the few that explores anti-biofilm efficacy against both single and dual-species biofilms of C. auris and S. aureus, setting the stage for future research aimed at developing alternative therapeutic strategies to tackle polymicrobial infections. Further studies testing additional strains will strengthen the conclusion and claims of this finding.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics16121570/s1, Figure S1: The bioavailability radar plot for the derivatives T1–T12 illustrating key parameters within the optimal “pink area”, which signifies the desirable range for six critical physicochemical properties: flexibility, lipophilicity, solubility, polarity, molecular size, and saturation; Figure S2: Bioavailability radar plots of all the derivatives obtained using ADMETLab 3.0 web tool. Green represents the lower limit, while as blue represents the upper limit. The compound properties are depicted in orange; Figure S3: Oral toxicity prediction results and comparison of T3 and Fluconazole using ProTox-II tool; Figure S4: Predicted acute toxicity of the most active compound T3 and the reference drug Fluconazole in honeybees using BeeToxAI, a machine-learning-based QSAR tool; Figure S5: Toxicity profile analysis of the most active compound T3 and the reference drug using the toxicity model computation tool and online database; Table S1: ADMET [Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity] Parameters of the compounds; Table S2: Toxicity profile analysis of the most active compounds using the toxicity model computation tool and online database.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.P., S.M., M.Y.W. and A.A.; methodology, M.Y.W. and A.A.; software, M.Y.W. and A.A.; validation, M.O.A. and S.K.; formal analysis, H.P., S.M., M.Y.W. and A.A.; investigation, H.P., M.Y.W. and A.A.; resources H.P., M.Y.W. and A.A.; data curation, M.O.A. and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Y.W. and A.A.; writing—review and editing, H.P., M.Y.W. and A.A.; visualization, M.O.A. and S.K.; supervision, H.P. and M.Y.W.; project administration, H.P., S.M. and M.Y.W.; funding acquisition, H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at University of Tabuk (Grant Number 0078-1444-S).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at University of Tabuk for funding this work through Research No. 0078-1444-S. Authors also acknowledge the contribution of research assistants Rawan Alsubhi and Taif Alenazi for conducting literature survey which greatly contributed to the development of this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Welsh, R.M.; Bentz, M.L.; Shams, A.; Houston, H.; Lyons, A.; Rose, L.J.; Litvintseva, A.P. Survival, persistence, and isolation of the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogenic yeast Candida auris on a plastic health care surface. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 2996–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Salam, M.A.; Al-Amin, M.Y.; Salam, M.T.; Pawar, J.S.; Akhter, N.; Rabaan, A.A.; Alqumber, M.A.A. Antimicrobial Resistance: A Growing Serious Threat for Global Public Health. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mirghani, R.; Saba, T.; Khaliq, H.; Mitchell, J.; Do, L.; Chambi, L.; Diaz, K.; Kennedy, T.; Alkassab, K.; Huynh, T.; et al. Biofilms: Formation, drug resistance and alternatives to conventional approaches. AIMS Microbiol. 2022, 8, 239–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Muteeb, G.; Rehman, M.T.; Shahwan, M.; Aatif, M. Origin of Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance, and Their Impacts on Drug Development: A Narrative Review. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kean, R.; McKloud, E.; Townsend, E.M.; Sherry, L.; Delaney, C.; Jones, B.L.; Williams, C.; Ramage, G. The comparative efficacy of antiseptics against Candida auris biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, S.; Chauhan, A.; Ranjan, A.; Mathkor, D.M.; Haque, S.; Ramniwas, S.; Tuli, H.S.; Yadav, T.J.V. Emerging challenges in antimicrobial resistance: Implications for pathogenic microorganisms, novel antibiotics, and their impact on sustainability. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1403168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmed, S.K.; Hussein, S.; Qurbani, K.; Ibrahim, R.H.; Fareeq, A.; Mahmood, K.A.; Mohamed, M.G. Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. J. Med. Surg. Public Health 2024, 2, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vallabhaneni, S.; Kallen, A.; Tsay, S.; Chow, N.; Welsh, R.; Kerins, J.; Kemble, S.K.; Pacilli, M.; Black, S.R.; Landon, E.; et al. Investigation of the first seven reported cases of Candida auris, a globally emerging invasive, multidrug-resistant fungus—United States, May 2013–August 2016. Am. J. Transpl. 2017, 17, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Forsberg, K.; Woodworth, K.; Walters, M.; Berkow, E.L.; Jackson, B.; Chiller, T.; Vallabhaneni, S. Candida auris: The recent emergence of a multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 1–12, Erratum in: Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sherry, L.; Ramage, G.; Kean, R.; Borman, A.; Johnson, E.M.; Richardson, M.D.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R. Biofilm-Forming Capability of Highly Virulent, Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 328–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gehrke, A.K.E.; Giai, C.; Gómez, M.I. Staphylococcus aureus Adaptation to the Skin in Health and Persistent/Recurrent Infections. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Boxberger, M.; Cenizo, V.; Cassir, N.; Scola, B.L. Challenges in exploring and manipulating the human skin microbiome. Microbiome 2021, 9, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kean, R.; Rajendran, R.; Haggarty, J.; Townsend, E.M.; Short, B.; Burgess, K.E.; Lang, S.; Millington, O.; Mackay, W.G.; Williams, C.; et al. Candida albicans mycofilms support Staphylococcus aureus colonization and enhances miconazole resistance in dual-species interactions. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, Y.; Huang, S.; Du, J.; Wu, M.; Huang, X. Current and prospective therapeutic strategies: Tackling Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans cross-kingdom biofilm. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1106231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kong, E.F.; Tsui, C.; Kucharikova, S.; Andes, D.; Dijck, P.V.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A. Commensal protection of Staphylococcus aureus against antimicrobials by Candida albicans biofilm matrix. mBio 2016, 7, e01365-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gülmez, D.; Brown, J.L.; Butcher, M.C.; Delaney, C.; Kean, R.; Ramage, G.; Short, B. Investigating Dual-Species Candida auris and Staphylococcal Biofilm Antiseptic Challenge. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bo, L.; Sun, H.; Li, Y.-D.; Zhu, J.; Wurpel, J.N.D.; Lin, H.; Chen, Z.-S. Combating antimicrobial resistance: The silent war. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1347750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zubair, M.; Husain, F.M.; Qais, F.A.; Alam, P.; Ahmad, I.; Albalawi, T.; Ahmad, N.; Alam, M.; Baig, M.H.; Dong, J.-J.; et al. Bio-fabrication of titanium oxide nanoparticles from Ochradenus arabicus to obliterate biofilms of drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from diabetic foot infections. Appl. Nanosci. 2021, 11, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abo-Dya, N.E.; Agha, K.A.; Abbas, H.A.; Abu-Kull, M.E.; Alahmdi, M.I.; Osman, N.A. Hybrid N-Acylcysteines as Dual-Acting Matrix Disruptive and Anti-Quorum Sensing Agents Fighting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms: Design, Synthesis, Molecular Docking Studies, and In Vitro Assays. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 19879–19891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alqahtani, T.T.; Alelyani, A.A.; Yousuf, M.M.; Wejdan, M.K.A.; Husain, F.M.; Zubair, M. Study of Plasmid-Mediated Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Clinical Strains of Enterobacteriaceae from Tabuk Region. Cureus 2023, 15, e40183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zubair, M. Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Activities of Citrus sinensis and Moringa oleifera Against the Pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Cureus 2020, 12, e12337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ali, A.; Zahra, A.; Kamthan, M.; Husain, F.M.; Albalawi, T.; Zubair, M.; Alatawy, R.; Abid, M.; Noorani, M.S. Microbial Biofilms: Applications, Clinical Consequences, and Alternative Therapies. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sharma, S.; Mohler, J.; Mahajan, S.D.; Schwartz, S.A.; Bruggemann, L.; Aalinkeel, R. Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Reena, F.J.; Phelan, J.P.; Gallagher, L.; Wood, D.F.; Shanahan, R.M.; Cano, R.; Muimhneachain, E.Ó.; McGlacken, G.P.; O’Gara, F. Exploiting Interkingdom Interactions for Development of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Candida albicans Biofilm Formation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 5894–5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rao, L.; Sheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Y.; Yu, J.; Wang, B.; Zhao, H.; Wang, X.; Guo, Y.; Wu, X.; et al. Small-Molecule Compound SYG-180-2-2 to Effectively Prevent the Biofilm Formation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 770657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Qvortrup, K.; Hultqvist, L.D.; Nilsson, M.; Jakobsen, T.H.; Cu, C.U.J.; Uhd, J.; Andersen, J.B.; Nielsen, T.E.; Givskov, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Small Molecule Anti-biofilm Agents Developed on the Basis of Mechanistic Understanding of Biofilm Formation. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Matin, M.M.; Matin, P.; Rahman, M.R.; Hadda, T.B.; Almalki, F.A.; Mahmud, S.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Alruwaily, M.; Alshehri, S. Triazoles and Their Derivatives: Chemistry, Synthesis, and Therapeutic Applications. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 864286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peyton, L.R.; Gallagher, S.; Hashemzadeh, M. Triazole antifungals: A review. Drugs Today 2015, 51, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lengerli, D.; Ibis, K.; Nural, Y.; Banoglu, E. The 1,2,3-triazole ‘all-in-one’ ring system in drug discovery: A good bioisostere, a good pharmacophore, a good linker, and a versatile synthetic tool. Expert Opin. Drug Dis. 2022, 17, 1209–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Faizan, M.; Kumar, R.; Mazumder, A.; Salahuddin; Kukreti, N.; Kumar, A.; Chaitanya, M.V.N.L. The medicinal chemistry of piperazines: A review. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2024, 103, e14537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, Y.-J. Heterocycles and Medicine: A Survey of the Heterocyclic Drugs Approved by the U.S. FDA from 2000 to Present. In Progress in Heterocyclic Chemistry; Gordon, W., Gribble, J., Joule, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 24, pp. 1–53. ISBN 9780080968070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wani, M.Y.; Alghamidi, M.S.S.; Srivastava, V.; Ahmad, A.; Aqlan, F.M.; Al Bogami, A.S. Click synthesis of pyrrolidine-based 1,2,3-triazole derivatives as antifungal agents causing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in Candida auris. Bioorg. Chem. 2023, 136, 106562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Parveen, H.; Wani, M.Y.; Mukhtar, S.; Ahmad, A. Synthesis, in vitro and in silico screening of novel ferrocenyl substituted cyclohexenone and indazole derivatives as effective antimycobacterial agents. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1311, 138472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wani, M.Y.; Srivastava, V.; El-Said, W.A.; Al-Bogami, A.S.; Ahmad, A. Inhibition of apoptosis and biofilm formation in Candida auris by click-synthesized triazole-bridged quinoline derivatives. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 21190–21202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pires, D.E.V.; Blundell, T.L.; Ascher, D.B. pkCSM: Predicting small-molecule pharmacokinetic properties using graph-based signatures. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 4066–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dong, J.; Wang, N.; Yao, Z.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Ouyang, D.; Lu, A.; Cao, D. ADMETlab: A platform for systematic ADMET evaluation based on a comprehensively collected ADMET database. J. Cheminform. 2018, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Drwal, M.N.; Banerjee, P.; Dunkel, M.; Wettig, M.R.; Preissner, R. ProTox: A web server for the in silico prediction of rodent oral toxicity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W53–W58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pa, C. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeast, 4th ed.; CLSI Standard M27; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  40. Patel, J.B.; Cockerill, F.R.; Bradford, P.A. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement, M100-S24; Institute CLS: Wayne, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  41. Srivastava, V.; Ahmad, A. Abrogation of pathogenic attributes in drug resistant Candida auris strains by farnesol. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, H.; Zhang, C.; Liu, P.; Liu, W.; Gao, Y.; Sun, S. In vitro interactions between fluconazole and minocycline against mixed cultures of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2015, 48, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fernandes, L.; Fortes, B.N.; Lincopan, N.; Ishida, K. Caspofungin and polymyxin B reduce the cell viability and total biomass of mixed biofilms of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida spp. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 573263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lone, S.A.; Ahmad, A. Inhibitory effect of novel Eugenol Tosylate Congeners on pathogenicity of Candida albicans. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shameer, M.K.; Shubham, B.; Ce, Y.; Dongning, L.; Zach, F.; Binghe, W. Click chemistry and drug delivery: A bird’s-eye view. Acta Pharmaceut. Sin. B 2022, 13, 1990–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Agalave, S.G.; Suleman, R.M.; Pore, V.S. Click Chemistry: 1,2,3-Triazoles as Pharmacophores. Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 2696–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997, 23, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Veber, D.F.; Johnson, S.R.; Cheng, H.; Smith, B.R.; Ward, K.W.; Kopple, K.D. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jafri, H.; Banerjee, G.; Khan, M.S.A.; Ahmad, I.; Abulreesh, H.H.; Althubiani, A.S. Synergistic interaction of eugenol and antimicrobial drugs in eradication of single and mixed biofilms of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans. AMB Express 2020, 10, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tsui, C.; Kong, E.F.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A. Pathogenesis of Candida albicans biofilm. Pathog. Dis. 2016, 74, ftw018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Young, T.; Alshanta, O.; Kean, R.; Bradshaw, D.; Pratten, J.; Williams, C.; Woodall, C.; Ramage, G.; Brown, J.L. Candida albicans as an essential “keystone” component within polymicrobial oral biofilm models? Microorganisms 2020, 9, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Carolus, H.; Dyck, K.V.; Dijck, P.V. Candida albicans and Staphylococcus species: A threatening twosome. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Luo, Y.; McAuley, D.F.; Fulton, C.R.; Pessoa, J.S.; McMullan, R.; Lundy, F.T. Targeting Candida albicans in dual-species biofilms with antifungal treatment reduces Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA in vitro. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lara, H.H.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Inhibition of mixed biofilms of Candida albicans and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by positively charged silver nanoparticles and functionalized silicone elastomers. Pathogens 2020, 9, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sabaeifard, P.; Abdi-Ali, A.; Soudi, M.R.; Dinarvand, R. Optimization of tetrazolium salt assay for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm using microtiter plate method. J. Microbiol. Methods 2014, 105, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mukherjee, P.K.; Zhou, G.; Munyon, R.; Ghannoum, M.A. Candida biofilm: A well-designed protected environment. Med. Mycol. 2005, 43, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Qu, Y.; Locock, K.; Verma-Gaur, J.; Hay, I.D.; Meagher, L.; Traven, A. Searching for new strategies against polymicrobial biofilm infections: Guanylated polymethacrylates kill mixed fungal/bacterial biofilms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kim, D.; Liu, Y.; Benhamou, R.I.; Sanchez, H.; Simon-Soro, A.; Li, Y.; Hwang, G.; Fridman, M.; Andes, D.R.; Koo, H. Bacterial-derived exopolysaccharides enhance antifungal drug tolerance in a cross-kingdom oral biofilm. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1427–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Scheunemann, G.; Fortes, B.N.; Lincopan, N.; Ishida, K. Caspofungin Inhibits Mixed Biofilms of Candida albicans and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Displays Effectiveness in Coinfected Galleria mellonella Larvae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e00744-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ponde, N.O.; Lortal, L.; Ramage, G.; Naglik, J.R.; Richardson, J.P. Candida albicans biofilms and polymicrobial interactions. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 47, 91–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Different antimicrobial drugs featuring a triazole (red) and piperazine ring (blue).
Figure 1. Different antimicrobial drugs featuring a triazole (red) and piperazine ring (blue).
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of piperazine based triazole acetamide derivatives (T1–T12). Reagents and conditions. (i) Dry acetone, r.t (ii) Sodium ascorbate, CuSO4, DMF (iii) HATU/DIPEA, DMF, 60 °C.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of piperazine based triazole acetamide derivatives (T1–T12). Reagents and conditions. (i) Dry acetone, r.t (ii) Sodium ascorbate, CuSO4, DMF (iii) HATU/DIPEA, DMF, 60 °C.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 sch001
Figure 2. Bioavailability radar plot of the most active compound T3 and the reference drug fluconazole obtained using ADMETLab 3.0. Green represents the lower limit, while as blue represents the upper limit. The compound properties are depicted in orange.
Figure 2. Bioavailability radar plot of the most active compound T3 and the reference drug fluconazole obtained using ADMETLab 3.0. Green represents the lower limit, while as blue represents the upper limit. The compound properties are depicted in orange.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g002
Figure 3. XAI heatmaps and molecular diagrams of T3 and Fluconazole (FLZ), highlighting key structural features that contribute to their classification as non-toxic compounds. The visualizations depict the influence of individual atoms on the overall toxicity profile, with green indicating toxicity-reducing features and red representing toxicity-enhancing features. Images were obtained using the cytosafe tool from LabMol.
Figure 3. XAI heatmaps and molecular diagrams of T3 and Fluconazole (FLZ), highlighting key structural features that contribute to their classification as non-toxic compounds. The visualizations depict the influence of individual atoms on the overall toxicity profile, with green indicating toxicity-reducing features and red representing toxicity-enhancing features. Images were obtained using the cytosafe tool from LabMol.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g003aPharmaceutics 16 01570 g003b
Figure 4. XTT reduction assay to evaluate biofilm inhibitory potential of T3 under single and dual—species condition. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm. Effect on biofilm formation (A) and on 24 h preformed biofilms (B) of individual pathogens and in combination was studies in untreated (control) and BIC50 and BIC90 of T3. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed for statistical significance using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Significance levels are denoted by *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 4. XTT reduction assay to evaluate biofilm inhibitory potential of T3 under single and dual—species condition. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm. Effect on biofilm formation (A) and on 24 h preformed biofilms (B) of individual pathogens and in combination was studies in untreated (control) and BIC50 and BIC90 of T3. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed for statistical significance using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Significance levels are denoted by *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g004
Figure 5. Viability assay of single and dual—species biofilms at different concentrations of T3. Cells embedded in the dual—species biofilm of C. auris and S. aureus (C. auris +, viable cells of C. auris in mixed biofilms; S. aureus +, viable cells of S. aureus in mixed biofilms). (A) Cellular viability during biofilm formation. (B) Cellular viability in 24 h preformed biofilm. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed for statistical significance using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Significance levels are denoted by ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 5. Viability assay of single and dual—species biofilms at different concentrations of T3. Cells embedded in the dual—species biofilm of C. auris and S. aureus (C. auris +, viable cells of C. auris in mixed biofilms; S. aureus +, viable cells of S. aureus in mixed biofilms). (A) Cellular viability during biofilm formation. (B) Cellular viability in 24 h preformed biofilm. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed for statistical significance using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Significance levels are denoted by ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g005
Figure 6. Percent inhibition in total biomass of formation and 24 h preformed dual—species biofilm of C. auris and S. aureus. Violet crystal (VC) staining method was adopted to evaluate the biofilm disruptive property of T3 at various concentrations. Percent inhibition in total biomass in untreated control was considered 0%.**, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.0005.
Figure 6. Percent inhibition in total biomass of formation and 24 h preformed dual—species biofilm of C. auris and S. aureus. Violet crystal (VC) staining method was adopted to evaluate the biofilm disruptive property of T3 at various concentrations. Percent inhibition in total biomass in untreated control was considered 0%.**, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.0005.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g006
Figure 7. Light micrograph of biofilm formed by C. auris and S. aureus under monomicrobial and mixed condition. The figure displays, (A) the inhibitory effect of T3 on biofilm formation and (B) effect on 24 h preformed biofilm. White and black arrows denote the presence of C. auris in the dual—species biofilm. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 7. Light micrograph of biofilm formed by C. auris and S. aureus under monomicrobial and mixed condition. The figure displays, (A) the inhibitory effect of T3 on biofilm formation and (B) effect on 24 h preformed biofilm. White and black arrows denote the presence of C. auris in the dual—species biofilm. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g007
Figure 8. CLSM analysis of dual—species biofilm stained with Con-A and FUN-1. The figure represents the anti-biofilm potential of T3 against biofilm formation, and 24 h mature polymicrobial biofilms formed by C. auris and S. aureus. The images show yeast and bacterial cells embedded in the dual–species biofilms that is captured at 63× oil immersion objective at ×2.0 magnification. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 8. CLSM analysis of dual—species biofilm stained with Con-A and FUN-1. The figure represents the anti-biofilm potential of T3 against biofilm formation, and 24 h mature polymicrobial biofilms formed by C. auris and S. aureus. The images show yeast and bacterial cells embedded in the dual–species biofilms that is captured at 63× oil immersion objective at ×2.0 magnification. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g008
Figure 9. SEM micrographs dual-species biofilms formed by C. auris and S. aureus. (A) Untreated mixed biofilms; (B) treated with T3 at BIC90.
Figure 9. SEM micrographs dual-species biofilms formed by C. auris and S. aureus. (A) Untreated mixed biofilms; (B) treated with T3 at BIC90.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g009
Figure 10. Hemolytic activity of T3. Hemolysis of RBCs by T3 at various concentrations. p < 0.0001.
Figure 10. Hemolytic activity of T3. Hemolysis of RBCs by T3 at various concentrations. p < 0.0001.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g010
Figure 11. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of T3 against RAW 264.7 cells using the MTT assay. The cytotoxicity analysis of various concentrations of T3 against RAW 264.7 cells.
Figure 11. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of T3 against RAW 264.7 cells using the MTT assay. The cytotoxicity analysis of various concentrations of T3 against RAW 264.7 cells.
Pharmaceutics 16 01570 g011
Table 1. Lipinski and Veber filters for drug-like characteristics.
Table 1. Lipinski and Veber filters for drug-like characteristics.
CompoundM.WtClog P *Log D #HBAHBDRBstPSARo5 (Y/N)
T1394.452.3782.3851766.29Y
T2408.472.5102.7451766.29Y
T3412.442.5172.2961766.29Y
T4428.893.4893.3451766.29Y
T5428.893.0312.8251766.29Y
T6473.343.1402.9551766.29Y
T7462.183.3963.1971866.29Y
T8462.443.3963.1781866.29Y
T9424.472.3862.4861875.52Y
T10439.442.2862.46718112.11Y
T11439.442.2862.33718112.11Y
T12463.343.6843.1951766.29Y
Fluconazole306.270.500.5671581.93Y
* At pH 7.4; # Determined with ChemAxonLogD predictor; standard drug; M.Wt: Molecular Weight; HBA: hydrogen bond acceptor; HBD: hydrogen bond donor, obtained by Marvin Sketch 23.16; RB: Rotatable bonds; Ro5 (Y/N): Rule of five followed or not; Y: Yes; N: No; Veber filter: Rotatable bonds ≤ 10, tPSA ≤ 140 in Å2.
Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of the test compounds (T1–T12).
Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of the test compounds (T1–T12).
TestC. auris MRL6057S. aureus ATCC29213C. auris MRL6057 + S. aureus ATCC29213
Median MIC (µg/mL)Median MFC
(µg/mL)
Median MIC
(µg/mL)
Median MBC (µg/mL)Median MIC (µg/mL)Median MFC/MBC (µg/mL)
T1156.25 625.078.12156.2512502500
T2312.5625.0156.25312.512502500
T39.7619.53 2.442.4478.1278.12
T478.1278.1278.1278.12625.0625.0
T519.5339.0619.5319.53156.25312.5
T639.0678.1239.0678.12312.5312.5
T7156.25312.5156.25312.5312.5625.0
T878.12312.539.06312.5625.0625.0
T9312.5625.0156.25312.5625.01200
T1078.12312.519.5339.06156.25625.0
T1178.12156.25156.25312.5312.5625.0
T12312.51250312.562512502500
AmB4.08.0NANANTNT
AZINTNT0.50.5NTNT
Each value represents the median of three independent experiments. AmB: Amphotericin B; AZI: Azithromycin; NT: Not tested.
Table 3. Biofilm inhibitory concentrations (BIC) of T3 against single and dual—species biofilm (during their formation and 24 h preformed) of C. auris and S. aureus.
Table 3. Biofilm inhibitory concentrations (BIC) of T3 against single and dual—species biofilm (during their formation and 24 h preformed) of C. auris and S. aureus.
T3Biofilm Formation24 h Preformed Biofilm
C. aurisS. aureusC. auris + S. aureusC. aurisS. aureusC. auris + S. aureus
BIC509.76 μg/mL
(0.25× MIC)
4.88 μg/mL
(0.25× MIC)
9.76 μg/mL
(0.25× MIC)
39.06 μg/mL
(MIC)
9.76 μg/mL
(0.5× MIC)
78.12 μg/mL
(2× MIC)
BIC9019.53 μg/mL
(0.5× MIC)
9.76 μg/mL
(0.5× MIC)
19.53 μg/mL
(0.5× MIC)
78.12 μg/mL
(2× MIC)
39.06 μg/mL
(2× MIC)
156.25 μg/mL
(4× MIC)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parveen, H.; Mukhtar, S.; Albalawi, M.O.; Khasim, S.; Ahmad, A.; Wani, M.Y. Concomitant Inhibition and Collaring of Dual-Species Biofilms Formed by Candida auris and Staphylococcus aureus by Triazole Based Small Molecule Inhibitors. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16121570

AMA Style

Parveen H, Mukhtar S, Albalawi MO, Khasim S, Ahmad A, Wani MY. Concomitant Inhibition and Collaring of Dual-Species Biofilms Formed by Candida auris and Staphylococcus aureus by Triazole Based Small Molecule Inhibitors. Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(12):1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16121570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parveen, Humaira, Sayeed Mukhtar, Mona O. Albalawi, Syed Khasim, Aijaz Ahmad, and Mohmmad Younus Wani. 2024. "Concomitant Inhibition and Collaring of Dual-Species Biofilms Formed by Candida auris and Staphylococcus aureus by Triazole Based Small Molecule Inhibitors" Pharmaceutics 16, no. 12: 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16121570

APA Style

Parveen, H., Mukhtar, S., Albalawi, M. O., Khasim, S., Ahmad, A., & Wani, M. Y. (2024). Concomitant Inhibition and Collaring of Dual-Species Biofilms Formed by Candida auris and Staphylococcus aureus by Triazole Based Small Molecule Inhibitors. Pharmaceutics, 16(12), 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16121570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop