Next Article in Journal
Antibiotic Loaded Phytosomes as a Way to Develop Innovative Lipid Formulations of Polyene Macrolides
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of the Effects of Drug 2c and Derivatives on Ovarian Cancer Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Lymph Node-on-Chip Technology: Cutting-Edge Advances in Immune Microenvironment Simulation

Beijing Key Laboratory for Separation and Analysis in Biomedicine and Pharmaceuticals, School of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(5), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050666
Submission received: 25 March 2024 / Revised: 9 May 2024 / Accepted: 14 May 2024 / Published: 16 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmaceutical Technology, Manufacturing and Devices)

Abstract

:
Organ-on-a-chip technology is attracting growing interest across various domains as a crucial platform for drug screening and testing and is set to play a significant role in precision medicine research. Lymph nodes, being intricately structured organs essential for the body’s adaptive immune responses to antigens and foreign particles, are pivotal in assessing the immunotoxicity of novel pharmaceuticals. Significant progress has been made in research on the structure and function of the lymphatic system. However, there is still an urgent need to develop prospective tools and techniques to delve deeper into its role in various diseases’ pathological and physiological processes and to develop corresponding immunotherapeutic therapies. Organ chips can accurately reproduce the specific functional areas in lymph nodes to better simulate the complex microstructure of lymph nodes and the interactions between different immune cells, which is convenient for studying specific biological processes. This paper reviews existing lymph node chips and their design approaches. It discusses the applications of the above systems in modeling immune cell motility, cell–cell interactions, vaccine responses, drug testing, and cancer research. Finally, we summarize the challenges that current research faces in terms of structure, cell source, and extracellular matrix simulation of lymph nodes, and we provide an outlook on the future direction of integrated immune system chips.

1. Introduction

Lymph nodes (LNs) are integral components of the immune system, functioning as critical sites for detecting foreign antigens within the lymphatic fluid and facilitating the orchestration of intricate immune cell interactions [1,2]. The extracellular matrix (ECM) within LNs provides structural support for resident immune cells. It plays a regulatory role in their migratory patterns and functional capacities, maintaining homeostatic fluid balance and efficient cellular trafficking throughout the organism [3,4,5,6]. Anatomically, LNs are delineated into several distinct regions: an encapsulating outer layer, a cortex predominantly populated by B lymphocytes, and a medullary region where T lymphocytes and plasma cells reside [1,7,8,9]. These specialized cellular contingents engage in a synergistic interplay, crucial for recognizing and neutralizing pathogens through filtration of lymphatic fluid, which is pivotal in eliciting robust immune responses [10,11,12]. Dysfunctions in lymphocyte activities, such as atypical T lymphocyte activation, uncontrollable B lymphocyte proliferation, and impaired natural killer (NK) cell functionality, may precipitate the onset of a spectrum of disorders encompassing autoimmune diseases [13] and an increased vulnerability to viral infections [14]. Consequently, an exhaustive understanding of the lymphatic system’s complex functions and specific immunological outcomes is essential for meticulously evaluating immune cell responses to therapeutic interventions, the precision of disease diagnostics, and the development of targeted treatment modalities [15,16].
Traditional research models include suspension cell cultures, animal models, human pathological tissue and organoid studies. The utilization of rodent animal models, such as mice and rats, provides a valuable platform for studying the complex environment within the human body, particularly in understanding the structure, function, and immune response mechanisms of LNs [17,18,19]. These models offer a robust physiological framework for researchers to investigate various aspects of LNs biology in vivo [20]. Using specific antigen stimulation or gene editing techniques, researchers can effectively simulate pathological states such as infection and inflammation in these animal models, after which mouse LNs are extracted and pathological sections are made to observe the corresponding pathological changes, as shown in Figure 1A. In addition, animal models can also be evaluated using cell flow cytometry and microscopy to assess the effects of drugs or vaccines on lymph node function [18]. For instance, a recent study has supported the notion that a slow-release immune strategy can enhance germinal center responses and neutralize antibody (Ab) generation, providing a promising avenue for vaccine design [21]. However, it is essential to recognize the inherent interspecies differences between mice and humans that may impede the direct translation of research findings from animal models to human biology. Discrepancies in the immune system, anatomical structure, cellular composition, and immune response characteristics of LNs between mice and humans may limit the generalizability of results [22,23]. To overcome this limitation, researchers have introduced humanized mouse models, where human hematopoietic stem cells are engrafted into immunodeficient mice, creating animal models with human immune system characteristics [24,25]. This innovative approach presents a promising platform for investigating human-specific LNs immune responses; however, it still falls short of fully capturing the intricate milieu within the human body [26]. However, the main drawbacks of current humanized mice are either the presence of a type of transplant rejection [27], the lack of thymus leading to a lower level of human T cell development, or the restricted source of donors and the complexity of model construction [28]. The sample size of tissues and organs directly derived from the clinical human body is very scarce, and the data source is also histopathological section observation and analysis, as shown in Figure 1B.
Ex vivo culture methodologies, including LNs fragment cultivation and cell suspension culture modalities, have been widely employed to recapitulate the cellular composition and immunological microenvironment of lymphoid tissues [20,29]. These advanced techniques allow for the dissociation and subsequent isolation of immune effector cells from the lymphoid organs of humans or model organisms, enabling the investigation of the diverse functional properties and differentiation pathways of various leukocyte subsets, such as T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and dendritic cells (DCs), under controlled laboratory conditions [30]. Notably, intricate co-culture systems juxtaposing T lymphocytes with antigen-presenting DC have provided profound insights into the complex molecular cascades governing T cell activation and lineage commitment within the LNs architecture, Figure 1C. Traditional two-dimensional cell culture techniques often face inherent limitations, especially the inability to replicate complex three-dimensional structures and microenvironmental features of lymphoid tissues, which may lead to experimental results that deviate from the physiological in vivo state [31,32]. Concurrent with the advancement of three-dimensional culture technologies, researchers have increasingly employed biocompatible matrices or cellular aggregates, known as spheroids, to create experimental constructs that more accurately mimic the structural and functional intricacy of human lymphoid organs, as in Figure 1D [33]. Groundbreaking progress has highlighted the potential of combining biodegradable scaffolding materials with resident LNs stromal cell populations in co-culture to reconstitute three-dimensional configurations that closely resemble native lymphoid organoids. This technological renaissance has enhanced our understanding of the migratory patterns and interaction strategies within lymphoid tissues and established a more relevant platform for investigative pursuits [34,35]. The inherent advantage of in vivo culture systems lies in the ease of experimental manipulation and the precision with which conditions can be modulated, facilitating the detailed examination of specific cellular entities or molecular pathways [36].
Organ-on-a-chip technology, leveraging the remarkable progress in microfluidics, biomaterials, and tissue engineering, has emerged as a groundbreaking platform for simulating human tissues and organs in vitro, offering unprecedented opportunities for drug screening, disease modeling, and particular medical exploration [37,38,39]. The primary functions of human organs are simulated by assembling cultured cells into three-dimensional (3D) tissue structures. The core objective is to create a controllable minimal functional unit that mimics the physiological state of the human body [40]. In contrast to traditional animal models, lymph node chips can overcome animal species differences by using human-derived cells to construct physiological unit structures to perform specific functions [41]. Cells cultured in vitro in petri dishes do not have 3D tissue or organ structures and cannot mimic in vivo physiological structures [42]. Compared to organoids, chips can be derived from a wider variety of cell sources, either from cell lines or from human primary cells, and utilize advanced technologies to reproduce specific functions within the lymph node. In addition, a microfluidic system can better simulate the flow state of body fluids, which is closer to the in vivo physiological environment [43]. This innovative approach enables more precise observation and investigation of biological processes and a more accurate assessment of drug safety and efficacy than conventional tissue culture methods and animal models [44]. Compared to static model-based approaches (e.g., organoids based on hydrogel scaffold), organs-on-a-chip can more closely mimic the natural physiological microenvironment and associated immune functions under the dynamics of lymphatic flow, thus more accurately replicating physiological dynamic conditions in vivo [9], as shown in Figure 1E. In addition, lymph node-on-chip allows for fine control and study of critical parameters of the lymph node system, such as shear stress (i.e., dynamic mechanical stress), continuous fluid flow, distribution of drugs/molecules, concentration gradients, and high cell densities, and have become powerful tools in the fields of pharmacology and toxicology in recent years [20,45]. The development of lymph node chips has promoted research on the interaction mechanism between immune cells and drug candidates, which is expected to reduce the high cost and high failure rate of drug development [46,47,48]. This innovative approach allows for more precise observation and study of biological processes, as well as more accurate assessment of drug safety and efficacy, compared to traditional tissue culture methods and animal models. [39].
This review meticulously examines the evolution and recent innovations in material science, compositional strategies, and structural design of chip-based systems that emulate the lymph node milieu in vitro. It discusses vital research directions in utilizing these chip models and their implications in pathology and pharmacology. Furthermore, the paper explores the potential developments of lymph node chip technology. The review provides a comprehensive understanding of how this technology has transformed our comprehension of immune system functions and associated diseases. It analyses the progression and key breakthroughs in lymph node chip technology, especially its ability to mimic the immune microenvironment. Thus, this critical evaluation underscores the importance of lymph node chip technology as a novel approach in immunological investigations, offering valuable insights and methodologies for future research in immunology and the treatment of immune-related disorders.

2. Integrating Lymph Node Models with Organ-on-a-Chip

The development of lymph node chips entails a complex design process that includes creating a biomimetic scaffold suitable for seeding and supporting immune cells, replicating the natural ECM microenvironment, simulating the dynamic changes in lymphatic flow seen in living systems, and faithfully reconstructing the unique cellular organization and spatial layout typical of LNs [49,50,51]. Researchers have used various methods to construct these advanced in vitro models of lymph node structures (Table 1).

2.1. Design and Fabrication of Lymph Node-on-Chip Technology

2.1.1. Lymph Node-on-Chip Scaffold Material

The agarose gel wall offers an adequate physical barrier for convective fluid flow and it separates the flow control unit from the matrix-containing cells. Additionally, agarose can provide a stable scaffold for common ECM components, such as fibrin and collagen [63,64]. Agarose gel can also uncouple the inherent coupling between fluid flow and chemical concentration gradients. Currently, there are 3D microfluidic devices that use agar to establish chemokine gradients. These devices are used to study the response of DC to chemokine gradients and how CCL19 and CCL21 produce different signals to regulate the homing and localization of DC in the lymphatic system [52,53]. Since agarose gel has a network structure, small molecules experience less resistance when migrating, making it easier to study the migration tendency. However, large molecules encounter more resistance during their motion. Agarose has poor mechanical strength and breaks easily [65], as a common carbon source for bacteria is prone to bacterial contamination [66]. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is a popular material for organ-on-chip fabrication, with microfluidic channels often easily formed through soft lithography [67]. It is known for its biocompatible, hydrophobic, and stable chemical properties in perfusion systems. In combination with hydrogel materials, it is possible to set specific concentrations to mimic the concentration of chemokines in the LNs to explore the migration of the relevant immune cells. It also facilitates the construction of regionalized lymph node structures (Figure 2A) [59]. However, there are still some shortcomings when using PDMS materials to fabricate microfluidic chips, such as a higher number of required steps, low throughput, and the absorption of small molecules. Follow-up studies are needed to refine the automation of microchip fabrication to compensate for the shortcomings. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) belongs to rigid organic polymer materials, also known as acrylic or plexiglass, which has the advantages of high transmittance, biocompatibility, and low cost, and PMMA is stronger than glass [68]. Despite these advantages, PMMA has limitations in processing accuracy, making PDMS the optimal choice for specific finishing requirements.

2.1.2. Simulation of ECM

The most commonly used chip culture hydrogel is made of collagen, fibrinogen, matrix glue, gelatin, polyacrylamide (PA), polyethylene glycol (PEG), or hyaluronic acid (HA) [69]. Type I collagen is the primary component of the ECM in LNs [70]. Most lymph node chips employ type I collagen-based hydrogels to mimic the lymph node ECM microenvironment. Furthermore, fibronectin can bind to various proteins such as proteoglycans, growth factors, integrins, and chemokines. Therefore, it is frequently used to reconstruct the ECM [55,58,71]. The chemical properties, composition, porosity, stiffness, cross-linking, and topological structure of hydrogels are crucial factors that influence immune cell migration and can impact the in vitro modeling of immune cell migration [72,73]. For example, Sergei et al. developed a microfluidic lymph node-on-chip (LNOC) to mimic the morphology and porosity of human lymph node ECM through a collagen sponge. The parameters of the LNs model can be more accurately adjusted by altering the shape and pore size of the collagen sponge [33]. (Figure 2B) The pores or openings in the ECM, also known as interstitial spaces, can vary in size and shape depending on the location and the state of the lymph node. In this research, they used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to analyze collagen and pore size and distribution. Generally speaking, the pore diameter in normal LNs ranges from 20 to 50 μm [34]. The obtained results are within the above range. To simulate a more realistic ECM of LNs in vivo, recent studies have combined stromal cells with hydrogels [74,75]. Research has demonstrated that enclosing stromal cells in fibrin, collagen, or fibrin–collagen hydrogel can enhance the creation of a matrix network and facilitate T cell infiltration [76]. Primary fibroblastic reticular cells (FRC) were introduced in vitro in the collagen–fibrin hydrogel model of cultured dendritic cell lines. FRC has been shown to enhance DC function in a more realistic human lymphatic microenvironment [77]. Perez et al. have designed a 3D PEG hydrogel that is covalently bound to low molecular weight heparin to mimic a lymph node for the proliferation of T cells (Figure 2C). PEG provides the necessary structural and mechanical properties, while heparin anchors CCL21. The 3D structure and load capacity of hydrogels can enhance primary human CD4+ T cell proliferation [78]. The ideal biomaterial should possess comparable stiffness, degradability, and capacity to support soluble factor binding, cell adhesion, communication, and movement as the target tissue [79,80]. We can then construct organ chips that more closely resemble LNs in terms of their ECM environment in vivo. These models can be used to study the complex interactions between stromal cells and other immune cells, including immune cell chemotaxis and migration, as well as the immune response of stromal cells in vitro.
Researchers will further characterize lymph node models to reflect a replication of the in vivo lymph node microenvironment. For example, the Cesare team characterized the collagen matrix of the multicompartmental lymph node chips they developed. Specifically, reconstruction of the topological parameters of the substrate using a customized image processing toolbox revealed that the collagen network had a porosity of 74.35 ± 2.19%, a pore size of 3.973 ± 0.460 μm, and that the structure of the collagen substrate displayed a protofibrillar morphology. Using the developed experimental setup, collagen permeability was measured to be 3.84 × 10−15 ± 2.41 × 10−16 m2 by Darcy’s law; matrix elasticity was quantified using the ElastoSense Bio2, with a stiffness of 138.62 ± 1.54 Pa, which is within the range of human LNs stiffnesses [81].
Several studies have shown that fluid flow generated by mechanical forces is similar to fluid flow in the body and can affect cells’ shape, function, interaction, and differentiation process [82,83,84]. The flow dynamics within the LNs and how its internal structure affects lymphatic fluid flow are critical to the immune response [9]. The lymph node chip achieves reasonable flow rate control through an active pumping system to simulate in vivo fluid dynamics. Moura et al. used an injection pump to continuously perfuse and control the flow rate to detect the dynamic interaction between flowing lymphocytes and adherent dendritic cells under five orders of magnitude of shear stress (from 0.01 to 100 Dyn/cm2) in real time. This provides the basis for studying the dynamics of cell–cell interactions in different biological environments related to the adaptive immune system, including variable speed, shear stress, deformation rate and migration processes [55]. In another study, the COMSOL model was first used to predict the wall shear stress (WSS) curves of LNs under static and inflammatory conditions. In a microfluidic device simulating the subcapsular sinus microenvironment, the channel width of the divergent part of the functionalized adhesive molecules increases linearly. Two types of WSS curves were reproduced by designing divergent shapes and selecting perfusion parameters used to investigate the effect of lymph node remodeling on cell adhesion in fluid flow associated with lymph node metastasis [62].
Figure 2. (A) Pattern diagrams and micrographs of microchips of simulated human LNs made from PDMS [59]. Reproduced with permission from Aya Shanti, Pharmaceutics; published by MDPI 2020. (B) A chip model using collagen sponges to mimic the cytoplasmic matrix of LNs and to study secondary tumors in lymphoid tissue [33]. Reproduced with permission from Sergei V. German, International Journal of Molecular Sciences; published by MDPI 2023. (C) Schematic diagram of a lymph node chip using a hydrogel formed by combining low molecular heparin with polyethylene glycol to mimic a cytoplasmic matrix and study T cell proliferation [78]. Reproduced with permission from Eduardo Pérez del Río, Biomaterials; published by ELSEVIER 2020.
Figure 2. (A) Pattern diagrams and micrographs of microchips of simulated human LNs made from PDMS [59]. Reproduced with permission from Aya Shanti, Pharmaceutics; published by MDPI 2020. (B) A chip model using collagen sponges to mimic the cytoplasmic matrix of LNs and to study secondary tumors in lymphoid tissue [33]. Reproduced with permission from Sergei V. German, International Journal of Molecular Sciences; published by MDPI 2023. (C) Schematic diagram of a lymph node chip using a hydrogel formed by combining low molecular heparin with polyethylene glycol to mimic a cytoplasmic matrix and study T cell proliferation [78]. Reproduced with permission from Eduardo Pérez del Río, Biomaterials; published by ELSEVIER 2020.
Pharmaceutics 16 00666 g002

2.1.3. Unique Cell Source of Lymph Node-on-Chip

Limited antigen specificity may limit their ability to recognize more than one antigen in immune chip models [85]. In most studies, only one or two types of immune cells have been used in their lymph node devices. The sources of cells are mainly divided into two categories. The first category is the immortalized human cell line. Common DCs are derived from the polarization of the mutz3-1 cell line, and the common T and B cell lines are Jurkat T cells and Raji B cells [86,87]. The second type consists of multicellular suspensions extracted from peripheral blood and single-cell suspensions after cell sorting. Some researchers also directly selected lymph node slices and added them to the chip to explore the function of LNs [88,89]. Cell lines are mature models that can be easily modified to target and study molecules of interest. However, immortalized cells cannot fully reproduce primary cells’ morphological and functional characteristics. The use of primary immune cells, which are typically purified from human blood or lymph node tissue, can overcome this limitation. While tissue slices can preserve the original spatial tissue and matrix network of organs, they are not often obtained from patients. Blood-derived lymphocytes are readily available and provide a rich source of cells, including T cells, B cells, granulocytes and monocytes in different activated states (such as naive, effector and memory T cells) [90], but require purification before use in the model system. Additionally, immune cells derived from the patient’s blood are specific and have the potential for personalized medical treatment.

2.1.4. Replication of the Spatial Configuration of the Lymph Node

The lymph node constitutes a sophisticated framework wherein diverse cell populations are strategically distributed. Authentic LNs delineate a B cell zone, delineated by inwardly protruding trabeculae and lymphoid follicles (LFs), comprising a network orchestrated by follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) [91]. The paracortical zone, also integral, harbors a concentration of T cells and DCs, constituting the T cell zone, crucial for T cell priming through the capture of antigens by DCs in the periphery, followed by migration into LNs [92] (Figure 3A). Notably, replicating the spatial intricacies of LNs poses a formidable challenge due to the intricate cellular distributions. Presently, membrane filtration stands as the primary method for bifurcating two channels: one establishes a chemokine concentration gradient to foster DC expansion or induce the formation of T and B cell follicular centers, while the other channel facilitates immune cell chemotaxis through continuous perfusion of culture medium laden with immune cells or antigens (Figure 3B). This encompasses bioassay and imaging to scrutinize migration, adhesion, and interactions among immune cells and antigen-presenting cells (APC) [55,57,58,61]. Precisely emulating the co-culture and spatial arrangements of diverse cell types, akin to their in vivo counterparts, remains a pivotal challenge in vitro lymph node modeling. Presently, most in vitro lymph node chips falter in replicating the compartmentalized structure observed in live LNs. Cesare’s team has pioneered the development of a multi-chambered 3D lymph node chip that encapsulates the essential attributes of natural human LNs [59]. The chip has a compartmentalized structure similar to LNs in the body. The upper region corresponds to the follicles housing B cells, while the lower region aligns with the paracortical area where T cells reside. This model impeccably mirrors the physiological compartmentalization of LNs, achieved by strategically using hydrogel-based microcolumns to segregate crucial locations and facilitate cell inoculation in distinct areas (Figure 3C). Such meticulous compartmentalization supports prolonged cell culture and replication of lymphatic flow patterns. Consequently, it has been instrumental in evaluating the impact of drugs on T and B cells [60]. Nonetheless, there are still limitations to this model. Notably absent are stromal cells and additional types of lymph node immune cells. Furthermore, the reliance on cancer-derived immune cell lines underscores the need for incorporating human-derived cells in future iterations of lymph node organ chips.

2.2. Research Insights Derived from Lymph Node-on-Chip Technology

2.2.1. Chemokines Facilitate the Migration and Homing of Immune Cells

Preliminary studies using lymph node microfluidic devices have focused on characterizing cell migration. Chemokines secreted by stromal cells mediate the localization of immune cells from the external region of the antigen to the correct compartment of immune activation in LNs and provide a scaffold for cell migration [93]. DCs present pathogens or tumor-exposing antigens that stimulate T and B cells in lymphoid tissues, leading to an immune response at the site of the lesion. Chemokines, such as CCL19, CCL21, and CXCL12, play a vital role in the immune response triggered by DCs. Haessler et al. used an agarose-based 3D microfluidic chemotaxis device to quantify the chemotaxis of mouse DC to a CCL19 gradient. This device is suitable for studying rapidly migrating cells, which is conducive to studying 3D chemical invasion of cancer cells or immune cells [53]. Ricart et al. reproduced the chemotaxis of single and competitive chemokine gradients in mouse bone marrow-derived DCs using another microfluidic device. They found that the CCL19 signal was stronger than that of CCL21 or CXCL12 [54].
Lin et al. used a fibronectin-coated Y-type microfluidic device to study the chemotaxis of blood-derived T cells to single and competitive gradients [56]. CCL21 and CCL19, which are CCR7 ligands, work together to transport and localize T cells in lymphoid tissues, which is crucial for immune surveillance and response. To investigate their interaction, the Lin team used a Y-type fluid device to study the effect of coexisting concentrations of CCL19 and CCL21 on guiding T cell migration in vitro. The results were explained through a mathematical model and computer simulation. Human peripheral blood T cells were found to migrate toward CCL21 rather than CCL19 under physiological conditions. Sonmez et al. developed a flow-free chemokine gradient chip system and used a stable gradient to control Jurkat cell chemotaxis and chemical kinetics. The results showed that the intensity of Jurkat cell chemotaxis in response to the CXCL12 gradient decreased with increasing surface fibronectin and that the concentration and gradient of the CXCL12 chemokine affected Jurkat cell chemotaxis. It is also possible to study the cross-regulation effects of multiple factors on cell movement in different biological processes [58].
Migration of B cells within LNs is essential for an adaptive immune response. Chemotaxis gradients are believed to direct B cells to move into the follicle, then move to specific areas of the follicle during activation, and ultimately exit [94]. Chemokine CXCL13 is critical in directing B cells to secondary lymphoid organs and germinal centers (GCs) [95]. Another chemokine, CXCL12, initially attracts immature B cells to the dark area of the germinal center, where they proliferate and interact with FDCs, after which B cells lose expression of the CXCL12 receptor CXCR4 and follow the CXCL13 gradient to the light area of the germinal center, where somatic hypermutation occurs [96]. However, there is no in vitro lymph node-on-chip to simulate the migration and transformation of B cells.

2.2.2. Interaction between T Cells and APCs in the Paracortical Region

In response to inflammatory signals, APCs acquire local antigens and migrate to LNs, where they bind to T cells for adequate antigen recognition and trigger an adaptive immune response. Understanding how T cells migrate and communicate in the LNs is vital to facilitate immunotherapy or vaccine design [97,98]. Researchers have simulated different in vitro models of LNs to study the interaction between T cells and DCs. One researcher built a two-layer PDMS microfluidic device in vitro. The top layer is a chemotaxis chamber where DCs are subjected to a chemokine gradient for migration. DCs undergoing chemotaxis settle into the T cell compartment below the chemotaxis chamber due to gravity, and the rapid DCs-induced activation of T cells is assessed by measuring calcium levels in the T cells (Figure 4A). The results show that DCs respond to chemokine concentrations and cross chemotactic channels without suffering damage, retaining the ability to activate T cells. This device can comprehensively assess DC chemotaxis and T cell activation induced by migrating DCs [57]. In vivo, T cell–APCs interactions occur at different interstitial flow rates. To further understand the intercellular dynamics and physiological conditions in the LNs, the researchers constructed a microfluidic device to observe the effects of flow shear on intercellular interactions. The platform is a PDMS-based biochip placed on a glass subplate and consists of a main flow channel with two inlets and two outlets. Two channels flowed continuously to introduce antigen-specific T cells, which migrated to the antigen-presenting DCs monolayer of the main channel, respectively, and the antigen-specific and non-specific attachment and detachment of CD8+ T and CD4+ T cells to DCs under different shear stresses were observed (Figure 4B). At a physical shear stress of 0.01 dyn/cm2, the average duration of T cell–APCs interaction was 12.8 min. This duration and the intermittent migration of neighboring DCs are consistent with those observed in vivo, demonstrating the effect of shear stress on T cell induction and activation. This model opens new possibilities for reconstructing the threshold of controlled mechanical force for immune cell receptor binding [55].

2.2.3. B Cell Follicular and Germinal Center Model

Currently, the experimental model of human humoral response in the lymph node microenvironment in vivo and in vitro has not fully replicated the complexity of the process of B cell differentiation and affinity maturation in the germinal center reaction. Upon antigen presentation by APCs or direct antigen contact, naive B cells differentiate into Ab-secreting plasma cells, memory B cells, and long-acting plasma cells through the germinal center reaction. This process is divided into cloning and amplification, somatic hypermutation, and switch-like recombination [99]. Reproducing B cell interactions help to probe how LNs mediate adaptive immune responses to infections and vaccines [100].
Based on three-dimensional biomaterials, the B cell follicular organoid system is primarily used to investigate how the lymphatic microenvironment influences the germinal center reaction and subsequent Ab production. For instance, applying maleimide (mal)-based functionalized PEG in designing immune tissues can regulate B cell differentiation and enhance the population of antigen-specific germinal center B cells when similar T cell signals are present [101]. Braham et al. have developed a synthetic polymer-based 3D lymphoid model incorporating human B cells in a PEG-4MAL hydrogel, supported by CD40L cells, human tonsil-derived lymphoid stromal cells and cytokines, and optimized for human B cell culture. This model better encapsulates the tissue complexity of the germinal center and enhances in vitro B cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, and Ab production [36]. In their recent study, Goyal et al. created a microfluidic organ chip replicating human LFs in vitro. The platform consisted of two channels separated by a porous membrane. Primary human B and T cells isolated noninvasively from peripheral blood were cultured in an ECM gel consisting of matrix gel and type I collagen in the lower channel. In contrast, the upper channel provided oxygen and nutrients to the cells through a continuous perfusion channel. Under perfusion conditions, T and B cells spontaneously self-assemble into 3D LFs and undergo Ab class switching to form clusters of plasma cells, which secrete antigen-specific IgG upon antigen stimulation after adding 2% DCs [57].
Chemokines regulate the migration and localization of immune cells, and their homeostasis is crucial for maintaining lymph node structure. In the LNs and spleen, chemokines regulate the adaptive response by facilitating the initial activation of lymphocytes and guiding their differentiation and phenotype [102]. Pathological induction or inappropriate gradient of soluble signaling molecules can lead to the development of immune deficiency diseases, autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammation, and cancer metastasis [58,103]. Understanding gradient sensing can be used to develop new treatments for diseases, for example, localized drug delivery for the immunomodulation of inflammatory diseases [104] and T cell engineering for cancer immunotherapy [105]. The emergence of the chip model of T cell–APCs interaction and dynamic microenvironment changes in the LNs paracortical region shows the potential mechanism of T cell initiation, activation and proliferation in the immune response process in vitro. This study lays a foundation for follow-up studies of the temporal and spatial changes in LNs in response to inflammation and disease, antigen binding, vaccination, and tumor drainage [106]. In LNs, antigen-specific B cells in LFs trigger humoral immunity when they acquire antigens from the lymph fluid diffused from the subcapsular sinus. After APCs present or encounter antigens directly, naïve B cells differentiate into Ab-secreting plasma cells, memory B cells, and long-lived plasma cells through germinal center reactions. These cell populations initiate a systemic Ab-driven infection response by reducing pathogen transmission and providing lasting protection after vaccination [107]. Research and development of lymph follicular and germinal center on-chip will further explore the adaptive immune response to infection and vaccine in LNs, advancing vaccine development and preclinical detection (Figure 5).

3. Applications of Lymph Node on-a-Chip

3.1. Immune Response of Lymph Node Models to Vaccines, Pathogens, and Drugs In Vitro

The abovementioned LNs chip devices successfully simulate multiple functions of natural LNs. However, they only summarize the selective characteristics of human LNs. Most lymph node chip studies have focused on simulating the behavior of immune cells, such as their response to chemokine gradients, migration, and interaction with other immune cells. As the primary function of LNs is to filter foreign particles, pathogens, and cancer cells, improved lymph node-on-chip devices should be able to simulate the immune response against these. Surprisingly, only a few studies have evaluated the ability of LNs to recognize pathogens and resist infection. Since the initial accumulation of immune cells and drugs usually occurs in LNs, an in vitro system that mimics the anatomy and physiology of LNs in vivo will allow the study of the mechanism of drug efficacy, efficiency and toxicity. This is essential for evaluating the toxicity of candidate drugs to immune components. Lymph node-on-chip can facilitate research into the interaction mechanism between immune cells, candidate drugs, and vaccine development.
Giese et al. developed HuALN (Human artificial lymph node), a membrane-based 3D bioreactor that mimics the structure of LNs [108]. This model allows long-term (14–30 days) repeated drug exposure to induce and monitor cellular and humoral immunity. The authors introduced peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and the commercial viral vaccine hepatitis A (HavrixTM) into the model. Quantitative analysis of the cytokine secretion spectrum showed that HavrixTM induced an early pro-inflammatory response rapidly downregulated during the first days of culture. The addition of immunosuppressive drugs (dexamethasone) to the system significantly reduced the secretion of cytokines. Immune cells were then restimulated with free antigen and antigen-loaded DCs to induce the release of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), and T helper 2 cells promoted the release of the cytokines Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Interleukin-10 (IL-10). In this model, plasma cells were regenerated, and the specificity of the plasma cells was demonstrated by antigen binding to the pp65 antigen. These results demonstrate HuALN’s ability to simulate immune responses against vaccines, pathogens, and drugs. Subsequent researchers used this model to test the immune effects of wild-type and fucosylated RSV-F-free glycoprotein vaccines. Additionally, HuALN can be a useful prediction tool for evaluating the immunogenicity of protein aggregates [109,110].
The critical structures of secondary lymphoid organs (such as LNs or the spleen) are primary LFs and GCs, especially during the “activated state” of inflammation or infection [108]. The formation of GCs indicates protective immunity against infections, which can predict the efficacy of vaccines and immunotherapies [111,112]. The enhanced lymph node-on-chip facilitates the study of the interaction mechanism between immune cells and drug candidates and vaccine development. It should reflect immune effects using cytokines and reveal lymph node-like biomarkers, the formation of neoplastic LFs or GCs, and the differentiation and development of plasma cells.
Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and CXCL13 were expressed on the resulting 3D multicellular aggregates. The expression of AID demonstrated its ability to perform the follicular function that circulating B cells typically lack [113], and it mediates the crucial Ab switching reaction in the germinal center [114]. CXCL13 is also a critical condition for LF assembly [115] and is usually used as a biomarker for LF formation [111]. The expression of AID and CXCL13 confirms that LFs exist in the chip. Goyal et al. used primary human immune cells obtained noninvasively from peripheral blood to self-assemble a microfluidic organ chip of human lymphatic follicles (Figure 6A). Under perfusion conditions, the model did not exhibit the self-activation previously reported in high-density cultures of human B cells. When IL-4 and anti-CD40 Ab stimulated naïve B cells, IgG was detected in the chip effluent, confirming that B cells in the chip were functional and capable of class switching. From the 7th day, the formation of CD138+ plasma cells could be observed in the stimulated LF chip, simulating the development and differentiation of plasma cells in LF. In addition, the LF chip was inoculated with commercial fluzone influenza vaccines containing three different virus strains and H5N1 pandemic influenza antigen prepared with squalene oil in water adjuvant Squalenein-water emulsion (SWE). High levels of secreted anti-HA Ab (Figure 6B), increased production of antigen-specific IgG for plasma cell differentiation, and four cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-2, GM-CSF) essential for T cell expansion, survival, and auxiliary functions were also detected. The text demonstrates that the chip can function as an LF chip, which is useful for investigating the underlying mechanisms of LF formation, physiology, and the human adaptive immune response. Additionally, it can be used to assess the effectiveness and safety of vaccines, adjuvants, and immunotherapeutic drugs in a patient-specific manner [61].
Furthermore, the Cesare team utilized a multi-chambered 3D LNs chip for drug response research. This device enables long-term cell culture and in situ viability testing, with the added benefit of measuring cell death without needing cell extraction. In their investigation of the immunomodulatory drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the team found that HCQ reduced the migration rate of T cells and promoted continuous rotational movement (PRM). It was speculated that the alteration in rotational motion resulted from increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production due to HCQ exposure. B cell motility and ROS levels were not significantly altered [59,60]. Cell movement is crucial in more complex immune responses, such as antigen presentation, cell activation, and Ab production [116,117]. The model allows the study of cell dynamics and complex biological processes and the evaluation of drug–cell interactions in multi-compartment and user-friendly devices. This may provide a novel, attractive platform for future vaccine and drug development. Ross and his team have designed a microfluidic chip that integrates mouse lymph node slices with a microfluidic system for localized chemical targeting. The three-layer PDMS microfluidic device consists of a perfusion chamber stacked on top of a stimulation port fed by an underlying microfluidic channel. Delivery of model therapeutic fluorescent dextran to specific lymph node regions demonstrated greater drug retention in the B cell zone than in the T cell zone. It provides a new platform for targeting and studying localized events in LNs and informs the development of new immunotherapies [118].
The LNs on biomimetic chips are useful for evaluating new immunotherapies’ immunotoxicity and solving existing drugs’ toxicity in clinical practice. Most organ-level lymph node models have focused on replicating humoral responses, specifically IgG secretion and germinal center development. In contrast, the model for organ-level development of the cytotoxic CD8+ T cell response is less developed, yet cytotoxic CD8+ T cells are critical for the induction of antiviral or antitumor immunity [119]. LN models are also needed to predict novel antigens’ immunogenicity following vaccination and assess humoral immunity, Ab production and B cell–T cell interactions [120,121]. Furthermore, vaccination and the adaptive immune response require integrating different lymphoid tissues. A more accurate lymphoid tissue model is needed to fully simulate the whole cascade of T/B cell generation, antigen presentation, and adaptive immune cell activation and migration [122].

3.2. Application of Lymph Node Model In Vitro in Disease and Cancer

The LNs organ chip is a powerful platform for studying immune-related diseases like cancer and inflammation [123,124]. Normal and diseased cells or tissues can be loaded onto a bionic LNs chip to monitor their behavior. A lymph node sinus microfluidic platform has been developed to simulate the hydrodynamic microenvironment of the lymph node subcapsular sinus. This device is designed to investigate the adhesion of cells related to lymph node metastasis in fluid flow after lymph node remodeling in response to disease or inflammation. Inflammation-induced remodeling caused changes in the fluid flow curve and the presence of adhesion ligands in the subcapsular sinus of LNs. Additionally, lymph-derived monocytes increase the adhesion of cancer cells in a lymph node flow-dependent manner, facilitating the invasion of cancer cells and monocyte immune cells during LNs metastasis (Figure 6B) [62].
Sergei et al. designed lymph node-on-chip (LNOC) as a tissue engineering model of secondary lymph node tumors formed due to metastasis (Figure 6C). The chip employs a collagen sponge to mimic the morphology and porosity of the ECM of human LNs, with a 3D sphere of 4T1 cells inside, simulating secondary tumors in lymphatic tissue. To prove the applicability of the chip in pharmacology, a mixture of bovine serum albumin (BSA)/tannic acid (TA) capsules and lymphocytes was pumped into the chip to evaluate the effect of the size of the contrast agent/drug carrier on the penetration and accumulation of particles in 3D spheres simulating secondary tumors. The fluorescence microscope scanning and quantitative image analysis results indicate that 0.3 μm-sized capsules can easily pass through the tumor sphere and penetrate the interior. This device can potentially become a reliable alternative to the early secondary tumor model and reduce the number of experiments in the preclinical research framework (Figure 6D). LNOC is also an attractive alternative for further analysis and understanding of the effectiveness of developed drug delivery carriers and contrast agents delivered to cells and organs [33].
Shim et al. reported a multi-compartment microfluidic chip co-culturing two tissue sections under continuous circulating flow to mimic tumor-induced immunosuppression. The device consisted of three layers of PDMS and a polycarbonate membrane containing two culture wells, two reservoirs, and two microchannels. Sections of mouse LNs were co-cultured with tumors or healthy tissues on the chip in the circulating medium, allowing soluble factors to be exchanged. Lymph node slices co-cultured with tumor slices were more susceptible to immunosuppression, suggesting that the chip could successfully mimic some features of tumor–immune interactions, such as T cell activation. In conclusion, this new microfluidic system provides an on-chip co-culture of paired tissue sections under continuous recirculation flow. It can mimic complex tumor–lymph node communication in vitro [88].
Lymph node-on-chip can aid researchers in comprehending the mechanism of the immune system in various diseases. By detecting and analyzing immune cell activity, protein interactions, gene expression, and other information, scientists can provide more accurate diagnoses and treatments for autoimmune and infectious diseases.

4. Conclusions and Perspectives

We summarize the design features of current microfluidic models to study LNs and discuss the use of these models in mimicking immune cell behaviors from immune cell motility to immune cell interactions and activation at the organ level, as well as the application of lymph node organs chips in immunology, drug screening, and vaccine development.
Central to the lymph node function is the unique spatial categorization of lymphocytes, stromal cells, and chemokines that drive the signaling cascade of the immune response. Specific messaging and collaboration between immune cells within the LNs allow for the timely triggering of reactive immunity in response to various pathologies [125]. Therefore, a significant challenge for lymph node chip models in simulating ECM is to reproduce the complex internal structure of LNs in vitro. The material of choice for lymph node chips is PDMS, usually fabricated using conventional soft lithography methods. Recently, 3D printing is emerging as an alternative to soft lithography, including inkjet, extrusion-based, light-based, and layer-by-layer high-precision build techniques for rapid prototyping of organs-on-a-chip. Cell-containing biomaterial models’ composition, spatial distribution, and structure can be precisely controlled [126,127]. This opens up the possibility of constructing lymph node chips with more complex structures. Electrospinning biofilm can replace synthetic PDMS or polycarbonate barriers used in microfluidic systems, with higher filtration performance and no need for additional coatings, providing a more natural microenvironment [128,129]. Electrospinning technology will also be helpful in the manufacture of complex models of LN biomaterials. More accurate modeling of in vivo tissue structures will not only deepen the understanding of lymph node immune cell movement and interactions across regions. Still, they will provide further insights into how drugs and vaccines flow, are delivered, and induce immune effects in the LNs.
Simulating the ECM in LNs on-chip not only presents challenges in terms of more complex physical cues but also requires the addition of biological cues to reproduce the ECM more realistically. LNs stromal cells are crucial for lymphocyte survival and migration, lymphatic transport, nutrient and antigen supply, immune monitoring, and adaptive immune response. They are critical for maintaining the structural integrity and function of LNs. Most lymph node chips currently use collagen or relocated protein-bound hydrogels as the matrix. In addition to the hydrogels mentioned above, they are covalently combining stromal cells [76] primary fibroblast reticulocytes (FRC) [77] or heparin [78] to mimic the ECM to promote the development and proliferation of immune cells. LNs stromal cells cannot be obtained from blood, so thymus and bone marrow stromal cells are often used instead of LNs stromal cells. There are multiple stromal cell subtypes in the LNs and most have not yet been obtained in engineered cultures, so the development of methods for reproducibly isolating, characterizing, and in vitro culturing specific LNs stromal cell subpopulations (e.g., FDCs) is vital to enable the construction of lymph node chips that more closely resemble the natural ECM environment in vivo [130]. These models can be used to study the complex interactions between stromal cells and other immune cells in immune cell chemotaxis and immune response.
As a platform for in vitro testing and screening of therapeutics, pharmacokinetics and toxicity are first tested in healthy tissue models [131]. Because genetic uniqueness may lead to different drug responses in different populations. Patient immune cells can be obtained through blood sampling or minimally invasive liquid biopsies and placed into a developed lymph node chips system to assess drug responses. For example, personalized chips are used to test the effectiveness of new vaccines developed against emerging influenza virus strains, drug resistance to cancer treatment, or to study the specific cellular response of specific populations to cancer treatment [132].
On the other hand, once the lymphatic vessels have transported the lymphatic fluid to the LNs, the fluid is filtered and returned to the bloodstream [133]. Lymphatic vessels play a vital role in immunity by facilitating communication between body tissues and lymphatic organs [134,135]. APCs and lymphocytes leave inflammatory tissues and enter nearby afferent lymphatic vessels, crucial for initiating and maintaining the immune response [136]. Most of the existing lymph node-on-chip channels are made and simulated using biomaterials. In the future, it is recommended that the lymphatic vessel and vascular model be integrated with the lymph node-on-chip. This will establish a lymphatic vessel lymph node vascular microcirculation organ chip, which can help to characterize the role of cell endothelial/matrix crosstalk and LNs microenvironment in immune response and barrier [137].
To date, some immune organ chips have been developed and their relevance to developing new drugs has been discussed [138,139]. However, the systemic effects of drugs cannot be studied with a single-organ chip. In an ideal immune chip system, candidate drugs would be introduced into the skin equivalent (similar to subcutaneous injection) or an intestinal equivalent (similar to oral administration). Subsequently, the drug will be transported to the spleen and LNs through the vascular and lymph vessels. The interactions of candidate drugs with the immune components in each organ will be accurately evaluated and quantified. This multi-organ chip technology can help scientists better understand disease pathogenesis and evaluate drug toxicity and effectiveness. It can also accelerate drug research and development, reduce the high cost and loss rate associated with drug development, and support the development of personalized and precision medicine. More biologically complex lymph node–multiorgan chip systems may become the next scientific frontier.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y. and Z.C.; visualization, B.L. and Y.N.; supervision, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 61604011 and the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Krishnamurty, A.T.; Turley, S.J. Lymph node stromal cells: Cartographers of the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zou, M.; Wiechers, C.; Huehn, J. Lymph node stromal cell subsets-Emerging specialists for tailored tissue-specific immune responses. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 311, 151492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fletcher, A.L.; Acton, S.E.; Knoblich, K. Lymph node fibroblastic reticular cells in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 350–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chang, J.E.; Turley, S.J. Stromal infrastructure of the lymph node and coordination of immunity. Trends Immunol. 2015, 36, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuan, X.H.; Jin, Z.H. Paracrine regulation of melanogenesis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2018, 178, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mehta, S.; Campbell, H.; Drummond, C.J.; Li, K.; Murray, K.; Slatter, T.; Bourdon, J.C.; Braithwaite, A.W. Adaptive homeostasis and the p53 isoform network. EMBO Rep. 2021, 22, e53085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Grant, S.M.; Lou, M.; Yao, L.; Germain, R.N.; Radtke, A.J. The lymph node at a glance—How spatial organization optimizes the immune response. J. Cell Sci. 2020, 133, jcs241828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huang, J.Y.; Lyons-Cohen, M.R.; Gerner, M.Y. Information flow in the spatiotemporal organization of immune responses. Immunol. Rev. 2022, 306, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shou, Y.; Johnson, S.C.; Quek, Y.J.; Li, X.; Tay, A. Integrative lymph node-mimicking models created with biomaterials and computational tools to study the immune system. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 14, 100269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fu, S.; Wang, Y.; Bin, E.; Huang, H.; Wang, F.; Tang, N. c-JUN-mediated transcriptional responses in lymphatic endothelial cells are required for lung fluid clearance at birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2215449120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Geva-Zatorsky, N.; Alvarez, D.; Hudak, J.E.; Reading, N.C.; Erturk-Hasdemir, D.; Dasgupta, S.; von Andrian, U.H.; Kasper, D.L. In vivo imaging and tracking of host-microbiota interactions via metabolic labeling of gut anaerobic bacteria. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ozawa, M.; Nakajima, S.; Kobayashi, D.; Tomii, K.; Li, N.J.; Watarai, T.; Suzuki, R.; Watanabe, S.; Kanda, Y.; Takeuchi, A.; et al. Micro- and Macro-Anatomical Frameworks of Lymph Nodes Indispensable for the Lymphatic System Filtering Function. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 902601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, R.; Miao, J.; Zhu, P. Regulatory T cell heterogeneity and therapy in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2021, 20, 102715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Khalil, M.; Wang, D.; Hashemi, E.; Terhune, S.S.; Malarkannan, S. Implications of a ‘Third Signal’ in NK Cells. Cells 2021, 10, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chee, S.J.; Lopez, M.; Mellows, T.; Gankande, S.; Moutasim, K.A.; Harris, S.; Clarke, J.; Vijayanand, P.; Thomas, G.J.; Ottensmeier, C.H. Evaluating the effect of immune cells on the outcome of patients with mesothelioma. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 117, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fourcade, J.; Kudela, P.; Sun, Z.; Shen, H.; Land, S.R.; Lenzner, D.; Guillaume, P.; Luescher, I.F.; Sander, C.; Ferrone, S.; et al. PD-1 is a regulator of NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cell expansion in melanoma patients. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 5240–5249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Heidkamp, G.F.; Sander, J.; Lehmann, C.H.K.; Heger, L.; Eissing, N.; Baranska, A.; Lühr, J.J.; Hoffmann, A.; Reimer, K.C.; Lux, A.; et al. Human lymphoid organ dendritic cell identity is predominantly dictated by ontogeny, not tissue microenvironment. Sci. Immunol. 2016, 1, eaai7677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Peng, H.; Ning, H.; Wang, Q.; Lai, J.; Wei, L.; Stumpo, D.J.; Blackshear, P.J.; Fu, M.; Hou, R.; Hoft, D.F.; et al. Tristetraprolin Regulates TH17 Cell Function and Ameliorates DSS-Induced Colitis in Mice. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lang, Y.; Lyu, Y.; Tan, Y.; Hu, Z. Progress in construction of mouse models to investigate the pathogenesis and immune therapy of human hematological malignancy. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1195194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ozulumba, T.; Montalbine, A.N.; Ortiz-Cárdenas, J.E.; Pompano, R.R. New tools for immunologists: Models of lymph node function from cells to tissues. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1183286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cirelli, K.M.; Carnathan, D.G.; Nogal, B.; Martin, J.T.; Rodriguez, O.L.; Upadhyay, A.A.; Enemuo, C.A.; Gebru, E.H.; Choe, Y.; Viviano, F.; et al. Slow Delivery Immunization Enhances HIV Neutralizing Antibody and Germinal Center Responses via Modulation of Immunodominance. Cell 2019, 177, 1153–1171.e1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mestas, J.; Hughes, C.C. Of mice and not men: Differences between mouse and human immunology. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 2731–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tao, L.; Reese, T.A. Making Mouse Models That Reflect Human Immune Responses. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Allen, T.M.; Brehm, M.A.; Bridges, S.; Ferguson, S.; Kumar, P.; Mirochnitchenko, O.; Palucka, K.; Pelanda, R.; Sanders-Beer, B.; Shultz, L.D.; et al. Humanized immune system mouse models: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Immunol. 2019, 20, 770–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tu, W.; Zheng, J. Application of Humanized Mice in Immunological Research. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1371, 157–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Walsh, N.C.; Kenney, L.L.; Jangalwe, S.; Aryee, K.E.; Greiner, D.L.; Brehm, M.A.; Shultz, L.D. Humanized Mouse Models of Clinical Disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2017, 12, 187–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McCune, J.M.; Namikawa, R.; Kaneshima, H.; Shultz, L.D.; Lieberman, M.; Weissman, I.L. The SCID-hu mouse: Murine model for the analysis of human hematolymphoid differentiation and function. Science 1988, 241, 1632–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. De La Rochere, P.; Guil-Luna, S.; Decaudin, D.; Azar, G.; Sidhu, S.S.; Piaggio, E. Humanized Mice for the Study of Immuno-Oncology. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 748–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mionnet, C.; Mondor, I.; Jorquera, A.; Loosveld, M.; Maurizio, J.; Arcangeli, M.L.; Ruddle, N.H.; Nowak, J.; Aurrand-Lions, M.; Luche, H.; et al. Identification of a New Stromal Cell Type Involved in the Regulation of Inflamed B Cell Follicles. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11, e1001672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alotaibi, F.; Vincent, M.; Min, W.P.; Koropatnick, J. Reduced CD5 on CD8(+) T Cells in Tumors but Not Lymphoid Organs Is Associated With Increased Activation and Effector Function. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 584937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jensen, C.; Teng, Y. Is It Time to Start Transitioning From 2D to 3D Cell Culture? Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Duval, K.; Grover, H.; Han, L.H.; Mou, Y.; Pegoraro, A.F.; Fredberg, J.; Chen, Z. Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture. Physiology 2017, 32, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. German, S.V.; Abalymov, A.A.; Kurochkin, M.A.; Kan, Y.; Gorin, D.A.; Novoselova, M.V. Plug-and-Play Lymph Node-on-Chip: Secondary Tumor Modeling by the Combination of Cell Spheroid, Collagen Sponge and T-Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lin, H.J.; Wang, W.; Huang, Y.Y.; Liao, W.T.; Lin, T.Y.; Lin, S.Y.; Liu, D.Z. Decellularized Lymph Node Scaffolding as a Carrier for Dendritic Cells to Induce Antitumor Immunity. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liao, Z.; Jiang, J.; Wu, W.; Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Sheng, T.; Liu, F.; Liu, W.; Zhao, P.; et al. Lymph node-biomimetic scaffold boosts CAR-T therapy against solid tumor. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2024, 11, nwae018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Braham, M.V.J.; van Binnendijk, R.S.; Buisman, A.M.; Mebius, R.E.; de Wit, J.; van Els, C. A synthetic human 3D in vitro lymphoid model enhancing B-cell survival and functional differentiation. iScience 2023, 26, 105741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, B.; Korolj, A.; Lai, B.F.L.; Radisic, M. Advances in organ-on-a-chip engineering. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 257–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Zhou, D.; Liu, Y.; Yin, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, Y. Emerging trends in organ-on-a-chip systems for drug screening. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2023, 13, 2483–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhao, Y.; Lv, X.; Li, X.; Rcheulishvili, N.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Deng, Y. Microfluidic Actuated and Controlled Systems and Application for Lab-on-Chip in Space Life Science. Space Sci. Technol. 2023, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kravchenko, S.V.; Myasnikova, V.V.; Sakhnov, S.N. Application of the organ-on-a-chip technology in experimental ophthalmology. Vestn. Oftalmol. 2023, 139, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Selimović, Š.; Gauvin, R.; Bae, H. Organ-on-a-chip: Development and clinical prospects toward toxicity assessment with an emphasis on bone marrow. Drug Saf. 2015, 38, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Panhwar, M.H.; Czerwinski, F.; Dabbiru, V.A.S.; Komaragiri, Y.; Fregin, B.; Biedenweg, D.; Nestler, P.; Pires, R.H.; Otto, O. High-throughput cell and spheroid mechanics in virtual fluidic channels. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Żuchowska, A.; Baranowska, P.; Flont, M.; Brzózka, Z.; Jastrzębska, E. Review: 3D cell models for organ-on-a-chip applications. Anal. Chim. Acta 2024, 1301, 342413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chramiec, A.; Teles, D.; Yeager, K.; Marturano-Kruik, A.; Pak, J.; Chen, T.; Hao, L.; Wang, M.; Lock, R.; Tavakol, D.N.; et al. Integrated human organ-on-a-chip model for predictive studies of antitumor drug efficacy and cardiac safety. Lab Chip 2020, 20, 4357–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shanti, A.; Hallfors, N.; Petroianu, G.A.; Planelles, L.; Stefanini, C. Lymph Nodes-On-Chip: Promising Immune Platforms for Pharmacological and Toxicological Applications. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 711307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ko, J.; Hyung, S.; Heo, Y.J.; Jung, S.; Kim, S.T.; Park, S.H.; Hong, J.Y.; Lim, S.H.; Kim, K.M.; Yoo, S.; et al. Patient-derived tumor spheroid-induced angiogenesis preclinical platform for exploring therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancer. Biomaterials 2024, 306, 122504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tabibzadeh, N.; Morizane, R. Advancements in therapeutic development: Kidney organoids and organs on a chip. Kidney Int. 2024, 105, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Min, S.; Kim, S.; Sim, W.S.; Choi, Y.S.; Joo, H.; Park, J.H.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, H.; Lee, M.J.; Jeong, I.; et al. Versatile human cardiac tissues engineered with perfusable heart extracellular microenvironment for biomedical applications. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zheng, F.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, H.; Fan, Y.; Dao, M. Patient-Specific Organoid and Organ-on-a-Chip: 3D Cell-Culture Meets 3D Printing and Numerical Simulation. Adv. Biol. 2021, 5, e2000024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cheon, H.; Gelvosa, M.N.; Kim, S.A.; Song, H.Y.; Jeon, J.Y. Lymphatic channel sheet of polydimethylsiloxane for preventing secondary lymphedema in the rat upper limb model. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2023, 8, e10371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Belanger, M.C.; Anbaei, P.; Dunn, A.F.; Kinman, A.W.L.; Pompano, R.R. Spatially Resolved Analytical Chemistry in Intact, Living Tissues. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 15255–15262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Haessler, U.; Pisano, M.; Wu, M.; Swartz, M.A. Dendritic cell chemotaxis in 3D under defined chemokine gradients reveals differential response to ligands CCL21 and CCL19. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5614–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Haessler, U.; Kalinin, Y.; Swartz, M.A.; Wu, M. An agarose-based microfluidic platform with a gradient buffer for 3D chemotaxis studies. Biomed. Microdevices 2009, 11, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ricart, B.G.; John, B.; Lee, D.; Hunter, C.A.; Hammer, D.A. Dendritic cells distinguish individual chemokine signals through CCR7 and CXCR4. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Moura Rosa, P.; Gopalakrishnan, N.; Ibrahim, H.; Haug, M.; Halaas, Ø. The intercell dynamics of T cells and dendritic cells in a lymph node-on-a-chip flow device. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 3728–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lin, F.; Butcher, E.C. T cell chemotaxis in a simple microfluidic device. Lab Chip 2006, 6, 1462–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mitra, B.; Jindal, R.; Lee, S.; Xu Dong, D.; Li, L.; Sharma, N.; Maguire, T.; Schloss, R.; Yarmush, M.L. Microdevice integrating innate and adaptive immune responses associated with antigen presentation by dendritic cells. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 16002–16010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sonmez, U.M.; Wood, A.; Justus, K.; Jiang, W.; Syed-Picard, F.; LeDuc, P.R.; Kalinski, P.; Davidson, L.A. Chemotactic Responses of Jurkat Cells in Microfluidic Flow-Free Gradient Chambers. Micromachines 2020, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shanti, A.; Samara, B.; Abdullah, A.; Hallfors, N.; Accoto, D.; Sapudom, J.; Alatoom, A.; Teo, J.; Danti, S.; Stefanini, C. Multi-Compartment 3D-Cultured Organ-on-a-Chip: Towards a Biomimetic Lymph Node for Drug Development. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hallfors, N.; Shanti, A.; Sapudom, J.; Teo, J.; Petroianu, G.; Lee, S.; Planelles, L.; Stefanini, C. Multi-Compartment Lymph-Node-on-a-Chip Enables Measurement of Immune Cell Motility in Response to Drugs. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Goyal, G.; Prabhala, P.; Mahajan, G.; Bausk, B.; Gilboa, T.; Xie, L.; Zhai, Y.; Lazarovits, R.; Mansour, A.; Kim, M.S.; et al. Ectopic Lymphoid Follicle Formation and Human Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Responses Recapitulated in an Organ-on-a-Chip. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, e2103241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Birmingham, K.G.; O’Melia, M.J.; Bordy, S.; Reyes Aguilar, D.; El-Reyas, B.; Lesinski, G.; Thomas, S.N. Lymph Node Subcapsular Sinus Microenvironment-On-A-Chip Modeling Shear Flow Relevant to Lymphatic Metastasis and Immune Cell Homing. iScience 2020, 23, 101751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Caldwell, D.J.; Rao, R.R.; Stegemann, J.P. Assembly of discrete collagen-chitosan microenvironments into multiphase tissue constructs. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2013, 2, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yang, Y.; Huang, J.; Liu, M.; Qiu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, T.; Xiao, Z.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, Q.; et al. Emerging Sonodynamic Therapy-Based Nanomedicines for Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2204365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Qi, X.; Su, T.; Tong, X.; Xiong, W.; Zeng, Q.; Qian, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Wu, X.; Li, Z.; Shen, L.; et al. Facile formation of salecan/agarose hydrogels with tunable structural properties for cell culture. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 224, 115208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yun, E.J.; Yu, S.; Park, N.J.; Cho, Y.; Han, N.R.; Jin, Y.S.; Kim, K.H. Metabolic and enzymatic elucidation of cooperative degradation of red seaweed agarose by two human gut bacteria. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Miranda, I.; Souza, A.; Sousa, P.; Ribeiro, J.; Castanheira, E.M.S.; Lima, R.; Minas, G. Properties and Applications of PDMS for Biomedical Engineering: A Review. J. Funct. Biomater. 2021, 13, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Li, Y.; Xu, F.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Fan, Y. Rapid-release reversible bonding of PMMA-based microfluidic devices with PBMA coating. Biomed. Microdevices 2023, 26, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Akther, F.; Little, P.; Li, Z.; Nguyen, N.T.; Ta, H.T. Hydrogels as artificial matrices for cell seeding in microfluidic devices. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 43682–43703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Wiig, H.; Keskin, D.; Kalluri, R. Interaction between the extracellular matrix and lymphatics: Consequences for lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic function. Matrix Biol. 2010, 29, 645–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Martino, M.M.; Hubbell, J.A. The 12th-14th type III repeats of fibronectin function as a highly promiscuous growth factor-binding domain. Faseb J. 2010, 24, 4711–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Doherty, E.L.; Krohn, G.; Warren, E.C.; Patton, A.; Whitworth, C.P.; Rathod, M.; Biehl, A.; Aw, W.Y.; Freytes, D.O.; Polacheck, W.J. Human Cell-derived Matrix Composite Hydrogels with Diverse Composition for Use in Vasculature-on-chip Models. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, e2400192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Shao, Y.; Jia, H.; Cao, T.; Liu, D. Supramolecular Hydrogels Based on DNA Self-Assembly. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Laner-Plamberger, S.; Oeller, M.; Poupardin, R.; Krisch, L.; Hochmann, S.; Kalathur, R.; Pachler, K.; Kreutzer, C.; Erdmann, G.; Rohde, E.; et al. Heparin Differentially Impacts Gene Expression of Stromal Cells from Various Tissues. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Black, C.; Kanczler, J.M.; de Andrés, M.C.; White, L.J.; Savi, F.M.; Bas, O.; Saifzadeh, S.; Henkel, J.; Zannettino, A.; Gronthos, S.; et al. Characterization and evaluation of the regenerative capacity of Stro-4+ enriched bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells using bovine extracellular matrix hydrogel and a novel biocompatible melt electro-written medical-grade polycaprolactone scaffold. Biomaterials 2020, 247, 119998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kim, J.; Wu, B.; Niedzielski, S.M.; Hill, M.T.; Coleman, R.M.; Ono, A.; Shikanov, A. Characterizing natural hydrogel for reconstruction of three-dimensional lymphoid stromal network to model T-cell interactions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015, 103, 2701–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Morrison, A.I.; Mikula, A.M.; Spiekstra, S.W.; de Kok, M.; Affandi, A.J.; Roest, H.P.; van der Laan, L.J.W.; de Winde, C.M.; Koning, J.J.; Gibbs, S.; et al. An Organotypic Human Lymph Node Model Reveals the Importance of Fibroblastic Reticular Cells for Dendritic Cell Function. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2023, 21, 455–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pérez Del Río, E.; Santos, F.; Rodriguez Rodriguez, X.; Martínez-Miguel, M.; Roca-Pinilla, R.; Arís, A.; Garcia-Fruitós, E.; Veciana, J.; Spatz, J.P.; Ratera, I.; et al. CCL21-loaded 3D hydrogels for T cell expansion and differentiation. Biomaterials 2020, 259, 120313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Masri, S.; Fauzi, F.A.M.; Hasnizam, S.B.; Azhari, A.S.; Lim, J.E.A.; Hao, L.Q.; Maarof, M.; Motta, A.; Fauzi, M.B. Engineered-Skin of Single Dermal Layer Containing Printed Hybrid Gelatin-Polyvinyl Alcohol Bioink via 3D-Bioprinting: In Vitro Assessment under Submerged vs. Air-Lifting Models. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wassif, R.K.; Elkayal, M.; Shamma, R.N.; Elkheshen, S.A. Recent advances in the local antibiotics delivery systems for management of osteomyelitis. Drug Deliv. 2021, 28, 2392–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. de la Zerda, A.; Kratochvil, M.J.; Suhar, N.A.; Heilshorn, S.C. Review: Bioengineering strategies to probe T cell mechanobiology. APL Bioeng. 2018, 2, 021501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khalili, A.A.; Ahmad, M.R. A Review of Cell Adhesion Studies for Biomedical and Biological Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 18149–18184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Esch, E.W.; Bahinski, A.; Huh, D. Organs-on-chips at the frontiers of drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lamberti, G.; Prabhakarpandian, B.; Garson, C.; Smith, A.; Pant, K.; Wang, B.; Kiani, M.F. Bioinspired microfluidic assay for in vitro modeling of leukocyte-endothelium interactions. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 8344–8351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Hammel, J.H.; Zatorski, J.M.; Cook, S.R.; Pompano, R.R.; Munson, J.M. Engineering in vitro immune-competent tissue models for testing and evaluation of therapeutics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 182, 114111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mittelbrunn, M.; Gutiérrez-Vázquez, C.; Villarroya-Beltri, C.; González, S.; Sánchez-Cabo, F.; González, M.; Bernad, A.; Sánchez-Madrid, F. Unidirectional transfer of microRNA-loaded exosomes from T cells to antigen-presenting cells. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lallemand, C.; Liang, F.; Staub, F.; Simansour, M.; Vallette, B.; Huang, L.; Ferrando-Miguel, R.; Tovey, M.G. A Novel System for the Quantification of the ADCC Activity of Therapeutic Antibodies. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 2017, 3908289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shim, S.; Belanger, M.C.; Harris, A.R.; Munson, J.M.; Pompano, R.R. Two-way communication between ex vivo tissues on a microfluidic chip: Application to tumor-lymph node interaction. Lab Chip 2019, 19, 1013–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Belanger, M.C.; Ball, A.G.; Catterton, M.A.; Kinman, A.W.L.; Anbaei, P.; Groff, B.D.; Melchor, S.J.; Lukens, J.R.; Ross, A.E.; Pompano, R.R. Acute Lymph Node Slices Are a Functional Model System to Study Immunity Ex Vivo. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2021, 4, 128–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Farh, K.K.; Marson, A.; Zhu, J.; Kleinewietfeld, M.; Housley, W.J.; Beik, S.; Shoresh, N.; Whitton, H.; Ryan, R.J.; Shishkin, A.A.; et al. Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants. Nature 2015, 518, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Pape, K.A.; Catron, D.M.; Itano, A.A.; Jenkins, M.K. The humoral immune response is initiated in lymph nodes by B cells that acquire soluble antigen directly in the follicles. Immunity 2007, 26, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chtanova, T.; Han, S.J.; Schaeffer, M.; van Dooren, G.G.; Herzmark, P.; Striepen, B.; Robey, E.A. Dynamics of T cell, antigen-presenting cell, and pathogen interactions during recall responses in the lymph node. Immunity 2009, 31, 342–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Comerford, I.; Harata-Lee, Y.; Bunting, M.D.; Gregor, C.; Kara, E.E.; McColl, S.R. A myriad of functions and complex regulation of the CCR7/CCL19/CCL21 chemokine axis in the adaptive immune system. Cytokine Growth Factor. Rev. 2013, 24, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Park, S.M.; Brooks, A.E.; Chen, C.J.; Sheppard, H.M.; Loef, E.J.; McIntosh, J.D.; Angel, C.E.; Mansell, C.J.; Bartlett, A.; Cebon, J.; et al. Migratory cues controlling B-lymphocyte trafficking in human lymph nodes. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2021, 99, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Cosgrove, J.; Novkovic, M.; Albrecht, S.; Pikor, N.B.; Zhou, Z.; Onder, L.; Mörbe, U.; Cupovic, J.; Miller, H.; Alden, K.; et al. B cell zone reticular cell microenvironments shape CXCL13 gradient formation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Liu, X.; Asokan, S.B.; Bear, J.E.; Haugh, J.M. Quantitative analysis of B-lymphocyte migration directed by CXCL13. Integr. Biol. 2016, 8, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Calvo, V.; Izquierdo, M. Inducible Polarized Secretion of Exosomes in T and B Lymphocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Xu, D.; Liu, H.; Komai-Koma, M. Direct and indirect role of Toll-like receptors in T cell mediated immunity. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2004, 1, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Rastogi, I.; Jeon, D.; Moseman, J.E.; Muralidhar, A.; Potluri, H.K.; McNeel, D.G. Role of B cells as antigen presenting cells. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 954936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ung, T.; Rutledge, N.S.; Weiss, A.M.; Esser-Kahn, A.P.; Deak, P. Cell-targeted vaccines: Implications for adaptive immunity. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1221008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Purwada, A.; Shah, S.B.; Béguelin, W.; August, A.; Melnick, A.M.; Singh, A. Ex vivo synthetic immune tissues with T cell signals for differentiating antigen-specific, high affinity germinal center B cells. Biomaterials 2019, 198, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Griffith, J.W.; Sokol, C.L.; Luster, A.D. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: Positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 32, 659–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ji, H.; Hu, C.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Ji, G.; Ge, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, M. Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: Molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Korkmaz, E.; Friedrich, E.E.; Ramadan, M.H.; Erdos, G.; Mathers, A.R.; Burak Ozdoganlar, O.; Washburn, N.R.; Falo, L.D., Jr. Therapeutic intradermal delivery of tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies using tip-loaded dissolvable microneedle arrays. Acta Biomater. 2015, 24, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Restifo, N.P.; Dudley, M.E.; Rosenberg, S.A. Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: Harnessing the T cell response. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Gillot, L.; Baudin, L.; Rouaud, L.; Kridelka, F.; Noël, A. The pre-metastatic niche in lymph nodes: Formation and characteristics. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 5987–6002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Akkaya, M.; Kwak, K.; Pierce, S.K. B cell memory: Building two walls of protection against pathogens. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Giese, C.; Lubitz, A.; Demmler, C.D.; Reuschel, J.; Bergner, K.; Marx, U. Immunological substance testing on human lymphatic micro-organoids in vitro. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 148, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kraus, T.; Lubitz, A.; Schließer, U.; Giese, C.; Reuschel, J.; Brecht, R.; Engert, J.; Winter, G. Evaluation of a 3D Human Artificial Lymph Node as Test Model for the Assessment of Immunogenicity of Protein Aggregates. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 108, 2358–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Radke, L.; Sandig, G.; Lubitz, A.; Schließer, U.; von Horsten, H.H.; Blanchard, V.; Keil, K.; Sandig, V.; Giese, C.; Hummel, M.; et al. In Vitro Evaluation of Glycoengineered RSV-F in the Human Artificial Lymph Node Reactor. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Cabrita, R.; Lauss, M.; Sanna, A.; Donia, M.; Skaarup Larsen, M.; Mitra, S.; Johansson, I.; Phung, B.; Harbst, K.; Vallon-Christersson, J.; et al. Tertiary lymphoid structures improve immunotherapy and survival in melanoma. Nature 2020, 577, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. GeurtsvanKessel, C.H.; Willart, M.A.; Bergen, I.M.; van Rijt, L.S.; Muskens, F.; Elewaut, D.; Osterhaus, A.D.; Hendriks, R.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Lambrecht, B.N. Dendritic cells are crucial for maintenance of tertiary lymphoid structures in the lung of influenza virus-infected mice. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 2339–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Epeldegui, M.; Thapa, D.R.; De la Cruz, J.; Kitchen, S.; Zack, J.A.; Martínez-Maza, O. CD40 ligand (CD154) incorporated into HIV virions induces activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) expression in human B lymphocytes. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Muramatsu, M.; Kinoshita, K.; Fagarasan, S.; Yamada, S.; Shinkai, Y.; Honjo, T. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 2000, 102, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Havenar-Daughton, C.; Lindqvist, M.; Heit, A.; Wu, J.E.; Reiss, S.M.; Kendric, K.; Belanger, S.; Kasturi, S.P.; Landais, E.; Akondy, R.S.; et al. CXCL13 is a plasma biomarker of germinal center activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 2702–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jackson, D.J.; Johnston, S.L. The role of viruses in acute exacerbations of asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125, 1178–1187, quiz 1188–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ai, J.; Guo, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Lin, K.; Song, J.; Fu, Z.; Fan, M.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Cellular basis of enhanced humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 upon homologous or heterologous booster vaccination analyzed by single-cell immune profiling. Cell Discov. 2022, 8, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Ross, A.E.; Belanger, M.C.; Woodroof, J.F.; Pompano, R.R. Spatially resolved microfluidic stimulation of lymphoid tissue ex vivo. Analyst 2017, 142, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhao, J.; Wei, C.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhao, D.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Bai, J.; Zhang, W.; et al. The intrinsic defects of T cells impact the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood Cancer J. 2023, 13, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Lin, Z.; Zou, Z.; Pu, Z.; Wu, M.; Zhang, Y. Application of microfluidic technologies on COVID-19 diagnosis and drug discovery. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2023, 13, 2877–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Ruggiu, M.; Guérin, M.V.; Corre, B.; Bardou, M.; Alonso, R.; Russo, E.; Garcia, Z.; Feldmann, L.; Lemaître, F.; Dusseaux, M.; et al. Anti-PD-1 therapy triggers Tfh cell-dependent IL-4 release to boost CD8 T cell responses in tumor-draining lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 2024, 221, e20232104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Kwee, B.J.; Li, X.; Nguyen, X.X.; Campagna, C.; Lam, J.; Sung, K.E. Modeling immunity in microphysiological systems. Exp. Biol. Med. 2023, 248, 2001–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Giannitelli, S.M.; Peluzzi, V.; Raniolo, S.; Roscilli, G.; Trombetta, M.; Mozetic, P.; Rainer, A. On-chip recapitulation of the tumor microenvironment: A decade of progress. Biomaterials 2024, 306, 122482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Pavesi, A.; Tan, A.T.; Koh, S.; Chia, A.; Colombo, M.; Antonecchia, E.; Miccolis, C.; Ceccarello, E.; Adriani, G.; Raimondi, M.T.; et al. A 3D microfluidic model for preclinical evaluation of TCR-engineered T cells against solid tumors. JCI Insight 2017, 2, e89762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ke, Y.; Xin, K.; Tao, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, A.; Shao, J.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, D.; Cen, L.; Chu, Y.; et al. A Thermosensitive Bi-Adjuvant Hydrogel Triggers Epitope Spreading to Promote the Antitumor Efficacy of Frameshift Neoantigens. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2306889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Park, J.Y.; Jang, J.; Kang, H.-W. 3D Bioprinting and its application to organ-on-a-chip. Microelectron. Eng. 2018, 200, 1–11. v. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, Y.S.; Yue, K.; Aleman, J.; Moghaddam, K.M.; Bakht, S.M.; Yang, J.; Jia, W.; Dell’Erba, V.; Assawes, P.; Shin, S.R.; et al. 3D Bioprinting for Tissue and Organ Fabrication. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 45, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Li, W.; Yin, Y.; Zhou, H.; Fan, Y.; Yang, Y.; Gao, Q.; Li, P.; Gao, G.; Li, J. Recent Advances in Electrospinning Techniques for Precise Medicine. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024, in press. [CrossRef]
  129. Valverde, M.G.; Mille, L.S.; Figler, K.P.; Cervantes, E.; Li, V.Y.; Bonventre, J.V.; Masereeuw, R.; Zhang, Y.S. Biomimetic models of the glomerulus. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2022, 18, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Mazzaglia, C.; Munir, H.; Le, I.M.; Gerigk, M.; Huang, Y.Y.S.; Shields, J.D. Modelling Structural Elements and Functional Responses to Lymphatic-Delivered Cues in a Murine Lymph Node on a Chip. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, e2303720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Yin, D.E.; Palin, A.C.; Lombo, T.B.; Mahon, R.N.; Poon, B.; Wu, D.Y.; Atala, A.; Brooks, K.M.; Chen, S.; Coyne, C.B.; et al. 3D human tissue models and microphysiological systems for HIV and related comorbidities. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 42, 526–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Nawroth, J.C.; Barrile, R.; Conegliano, D.; van Riet, S.; Hiemstra, P.S.; Villenave, R. Stem cell-based Lung-on-Chips: The best of both worlds? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 140, 12–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Alderfer, L.; Hall, E.; Hanjaya-Putra, D. Harnessing biomaterials for lymphatic system modulation. Acta Biomater. 2021, 133, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Solari, E.; Marcozzi, C.; Negrini, D.; Moriondo, A. Lymphatic Vessels and Their Surroundings: How Local Physical Factors Affect Lymph Flow. Biology 2020, 9, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zhou, S.; Zhao, G.; Chen, R.; Li, Y.; Huang, J.; Kuang, L.; Zhang, D.; Li, Z.; Xu, H.; Xiang, W.; et al. Lymphatic vessels: Roles and potential therapeutic intervention in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Theranostics 2024, 14, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Johnson, L.A.; Clasper, S.; Holt, A.P.; Lalor, P.F.; Baban, D.; Jackson, D.G. An inflammation-induced mechanism for leukocyte transmigration across lymphatic vessel endothelium. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 2763–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Henderson, A.R.; Ilan, I.S.; Lee, E. A bioengineered lymphatic vessel model for studying lymphatic endothelial cell-cell junction and barrier function. Microcirculation 2021, 28, e12730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Van Os, L.; Engelhardt, B.; Guenat, O.T. Integration of immune cells in organs-on-chips: A tutorial. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1191104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Hammel, J.H.; Cook, S.R.; Belanger, M.C.; Munson, J.M.; Pompano, R.R. Modeling Immunity In Vitro: Slices, Chips, and Engineered Tissues. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 23, 461–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Advancements in lymph node research models. (A) Animal model construction and characterization. (B) Human tissue and organ preparation for pathological section observation. (C) Extracted mouse lymph node cells in suspension culture. (D) Organoid model. Induced pluripotent stem cells extracted from the human body are mixed with matrix gel to prepare a three-dimensional spherical structure organoid. (E) Organ-on-a-chip model. PDMS, hydrogel, and other raw materials are used to construct and simulate the structure of LNs, into which the corresponding cells of lymph node tissues are added. Peristaltic pumps, tubes, and other materials are integrated to create a closed-loop system that accurately replicates the dynamic flow conditions within the human body. (created by Biorender).
Figure 1. Advancements in lymph node research models. (A) Animal model construction and characterization. (B) Human tissue and organ preparation for pathological section observation. (C) Extracted mouse lymph node cells in suspension culture. (D) Organoid model. Induced pluripotent stem cells extracted from the human body are mixed with matrix gel to prepare a three-dimensional spherical structure organoid. (E) Organ-on-a-chip model. PDMS, hydrogel, and other raw materials are used to construct and simulate the structure of LNs, into which the corresponding cells of lymph node tissues are added. Peristaltic pumps, tubes, and other materials are integrated to create a closed-loop system that accurately replicates the dynamic flow conditions within the human body. (created by Biorender).
Pharmaceutics 16 00666 g001
Figure 3. (A) Physiological structure of LNs. (B) Two-channel lymph node organ-on-a-chip model [61]. Reproduced with permission from Girija Goyal, Advanced Science; published by Wiley-VCH GmbH 2022. (C) Biomimetic localized lymph node chip [59]. Reproduced with permission from Aya Shanti, Pharmaceutics; published by MDPI 2020.
Figure 3. (A) Physiological structure of LNs. (B) Two-channel lymph node organ-on-a-chip model [61]. Reproduced with permission from Girija Goyal, Advanced Science; published by Wiley-VCH GmbH 2022. (C) Biomimetic localized lymph node chip [59]. Reproduced with permission from Aya Shanti, Pharmaceutics; published by MDPI 2020.
Pharmaceutics 16 00666 g003
Figure 4. Diagram modeling the interaction between T cells and APCs. (A) DCs converge to T cell compartments in the presence of chemokines [57]. (B) T cells bind to DCs under the influence of different shear stress [55].
Figure 4. Diagram modeling the interaction between T cells and APCs. (A) DCs converge to T cell compartments in the presence of chemokines [57]. (B) T cells bind to DCs under the influence of different shear stress [55].
Pharmaceutics 16 00666 g004
Figure 5. Lymph node chips’ main research directions. Includes chemokine-mediated migration and homing of immune cells, antigen presentation, cellular immunity, and humoral immune activation of GCs. (Created by Biorender).
Figure 5. Lymph node chips’ main research directions. Includes chemokine-mediated migration and homing of immune cells, antigen presentation, cellular immunity, and humoral immune activation of GCs. (Created by Biorender).
Pharmaceutics 16 00666 g005
Figure 6. (A) Schematic diagram of the lymphoid follicle-like microfluidic chip device. (B) Anti-HA Ab signals were detected in unstimulated (medium) or H5N1 antigen (H5N1) alone or SWE (+SWE) stimulated LF Chip effluent or cell culture medium maintained in 2D culture (2D) for 9 days, which can be used to develop vaccines and adjuvant therapeutics. Each data point indicates one well or chip; different colored points indicate chips or wells from 4 independent donors. Statistical differences are tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by pair-wise testing using the uncorrected Dunn’s test); * p < 0.05. [61]. Reproduced with permission from Girija Goyal, Advanced Science.; published by Wiley-VCH GmbH 2022. (C) Schematic of the chip used to study secondary tumors. (D) A total of 0.3, 0.5, and 4 μm bovine serum albumin (BSA)/tannic acid (TA) capsules were mixed with lymphocytes and pumped to the chip. Capsule penetration was examined using fluorescence chip scanning and quantitative image analysis. Lymphocyte cells (Calcein Am, green fluorescence), and (a) 0.3, (b) 0.5, and (c) 4 μm polymer capsules (Cy5, red fluorescence). (df) Orthogonal fluorescence images of cell spheroids with internalized (d) 0.3, (e) 0.5, and (f) 4 μm capsules [33]. Reproduced with permission from Sergei V. German, International Journal of Molecular Sciences; published by MDPI 2023.
Figure 6. (A) Schematic diagram of the lymphoid follicle-like microfluidic chip device. (B) Anti-HA Ab signals were detected in unstimulated (medium) or H5N1 antigen (H5N1) alone or SWE (+SWE) stimulated LF Chip effluent or cell culture medium maintained in 2D culture (2D) for 9 days, which can be used to develop vaccines and adjuvant therapeutics. Each data point indicates one well or chip; different colored points indicate chips or wells from 4 independent donors. Statistical differences are tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by pair-wise testing using the uncorrected Dunn’s test); * p < 0.05. [61]. Reproduced with permission from Girija Goyal, Advanced Science.; published by Wiley-VCH GmbH 2022. (C) Schematic of the chip used to study secondary tumors. (D) A total of 0.3, 0.5, and 4 μm bovine serum albumin (BSA)/tannic acid (TA) capsules were mixed with lymphocytes and pumped to the chip. Capsule penetration was examined using fluorescence chip scanning and quantitative image analysis. Lymphocyte cells (Calcein Am, green fluorescence), and (a) 0.3, (b) 0.5, and (c) 4 μm polymer capsules (Cy5, red fluorescence). (df) Orthogonal fluorescence images of cell spheroids with internalized (d) 0.3, (e) 0.5, and (f) 4 μm capsules [33]. Reproduced with permission from Sergei V. German, International Journal of Molecular Sciences; published by MDPI 2023.
Pharmaceutics 16 00666 g006
Table 1. Summary of existing in vitro lymph nodes on-chip.
Table 1. Summary of existing in vitro lymph nodes on-chip.
Reference ArticleSpatial ConfigurationLymph Node Scaffolding MaterialECM MaterialDynamic ConditionFluid Flow RateCellular ComponentCELL SourceCell Culture TimeValidated Immune System Function
1Haessler et al. (2011) [52]Immune cells in the middle channel and chemokine channels of different concentrations on either side.AgaroseHydrogel (Type I collagen+ Matrigel)Active pumping1 μL/min (chemokine)Dendritic cell (primary)Mouse120 minEstablish stable and well-defined gradients in advance.
Visualize live-cell migration.
The DC migrated more efficiently to the higher gradient of CCL21.
2Haessler et al. (2009) [53]1.0 mm thick agarose membrane patterned with four sets of three-channel units, each unit containing a cell-ECM channel and two flow channels.AgaroseHydrogel (Type I collagen)Active pumping5 μL/min (chemokine)Dendritic cellMouse bone
marrow
Quantified the chemotactic response of murine DC to a gradient of CCL19
3Ricart et al. (2011) [54]Three different cytokine input mix regions (forms smooth gradient).PDMSFibronectinSyringe pump9 μL/min (chemokine)Dendritic cellMouse bone
marrow
60 minA single chemokine gradient and a competitive chemokine gradient were presented in the controlled microenvironment (CCL21, CCL19, CXCL12).
4Moura et al. (2016) [55]It has one main channel, two entrances, and two exits. Two distinct inlets pump CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, respectively.PDMS Hydrogel (Collagen or Fibronectin)Syringe pump10−4–1 mL/min (T cell)Murine tumor DC
MF2.2D, OVAII
RF33.70/OVAI
Mouse Dynamic interaction of flowing lymphocytes with adherent DC, Effects of low and high shear stress variations on adhesion
5Lin et al. (2006) [56]A “Y” type fluidic channel.PDMSFibronectinSyringe pump0.2 mL/min (chemokine)T cell (activation)Human Blood20 minHuman T cells in response to single and competing gradients of chemokine CCL19 and CXCL12.
6Mitra et al. (2013) [57]Two layers of PDMS: the top layer contains the chemotaxis chamber, and the bottom layer includes the T cell compartment.PDMSHydrogel Syringe pump0.4–0.5 μL/minMUTZ-3: Human dendritic cell line
T cell
Human
Human Blood
2 hMature DCs are subject to a gradient effect by the chemokine CCL19
Mature DCs are collected in T cell compartments to induce T cell activation.
7Sonmez et al. (2020) [58]PC membrane filters separate two PDMS layers:
the upper layer consists of flow channels, and the lower layer consists of flow-free chambers.
PDMS (0.4 μm PC membrane filter)Fibronectin Jurkat: Human T cell lineHuman30 minThe chemotaxis of the Jurkat cells was also found to be governed by the CXCL12 gradient and the average CXCL12 concentration.
8Shanti et al. (2020) [59]A multi-chamber bioreactor, separated by circularly distributed microcolumns. The outermost region corresponds to the subcapsular sinus, the middle region corresponds to the reticular ductal structure, and the inner region is divided into upper and lower regions, corresponding to the B follicle and paracortex.PDMS
(Hydrogel microcolumns)
Hydrogel (Type I collagen)micropump EB1: Human B cell line
THP-1:Human Dendritic cell line
Jurkat: Human T cell line
Human72 hLong-term culture and in situ viability testing of Sertoli cells
Interactions between different cell types across chamber boundaries were observed.
The flow pattern of lymphatic fluid was replicated.
9Hallfors et al. (2021) [60]microfluidic pump S3 μL/minRaji B: Human B cell line
Jurkat: Human T cell line
Tested the effect of the immunomodulatory drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on cells.
10Goyal et al. (2022) [61]Two channels are divided by a porous membrane; the lower channel consists of T, B lymphocytes, and hydrogels, and the upper channel is continuously perfused with mediumPDMS Hydrogelperistaltic pumps or Automated Zoe Organ Chip instruments 60 µL/hT cell
B cell
Human Blood>9 dMimic germinal center formation, class switching, and Ab production.
Antigen-specific Ab can be produced by the commercial Fluzone influenza vaccine for three different strains and the H5N1 pandemic influenza antigen inoculated LF chip formulated with the oil-in-water adjuvant SVE of squalene.
11Birmingham et al. (2020) [62]Constructed from a sheet of PDMS and a polystyrene tissue culture plate between which is a 125 μm adhesive gasket.PDMSNo hydrogelActive pumping2.5 μg/mL Thp1 human monocyte line
LS174T human colon cancer cell line
PANC-1 human pancreatic cell line
Human Effect of subcapsular sinus biophysical (flow and structure) and biochemical (adhesion molecule expression) remodeling on cellular adhesion.
12German et al. (2023) [33]A central channel with an extension in the center of the main channel in which a collagen sponge is mounted, inside which cell spheroids are placed.PDMSCollagen spongeMicro pumps0.65 mL/h4T1 breast cancer spheroids
Jurkat cell
Human To evaluate the effect of contrast/drug vehicle size on the penetration and accumulation of particles in 3D spheroids simulating secondary tumors with lymphadenopathy.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, B.; Niu, Y.; Li, X. Lymph Node-on-Chip Technology: Cutting-Edge Advances in Immune Microenvironment Simulation. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050666

AMA Style

Wang Q, Yang Y, Chen Z, Li B, Niu Y, Li X. Lymph Node-on-Chip Technology: Cutting-Edge Advances in Immune Microenvironment Simulation. Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(5):666. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050666

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Qi, Yuanzhan Yang, Zixuan Chen, Bo Li, Yumeng Niu, and Xiaoqiong Li. 2024. "Lymph Node-on-Chip Technology: Cutting-Edge Advances in Immune Microenvironment Simulation" Pharmaceutics 16, no. 5: 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050666

APA Style

Wang, Q., Yang, Y., Chen, Z., Li, B., Niu, Y., & Li, X. (2024). Lymph Node-on-Chip Technology: Cutting-Edge Advances in Immune Microenvironment Simulation. Pharmaceutics, 16(5), 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050666

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop