Next Article in Journal
Effective and Efficient DDoS Attack Detection Using Deep Learning Algorithm, Multi-Layer Perceptron
Previous Article in Journal
Collaborative Storage and Resolution Method between Layers in Hierarchical ICN Name Resolution Systems
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Efficient Model-Based Clustering via Joint Multiple Sink Placement for WSNs

Future Internet 2023, 15(2), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15020075
by Soukaina Bouarourou 1,*, Abderrahim Zannou 2, El Habib Nfaoui 1 and Abdelhak Boulaalam 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Future Internet 2023, 15(2), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15020075
Submission received: 10 January 2023 / Revised: 1 February 2023 / Accepted: 4 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Internet of Things)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached pdf file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1) At the beginning of the Introduction, the authors provide a nice overview of the main application scenarios of WSNs. However, some of the references are a bit outdated even if the topics covered (e.g., environmental monitoring) significantly expanded over the last two/three years. Therefore, in my opinion it is necessary to replace or extend the literature overview by adding more recent references on the topic, which also more clearly highlight the main technological evolutions of WSNs and how they will play a fundamental role in the coming IoT era. From a quick search on Google schola, some interesting and very recent references that I could suggest are:

- "Toward Integrated Large-Scale Environmental Monitoring Using WSN/UAV/Crowdsensing: A Review of Applications, Signal Processing, and Future Perspectives", Sensors, 2022;

- "Machine Learning for Wireless Sensor Networks Security: An Overview of Challenges and Issues", Sensors, 2022.

2) Please fix the dimensions of Table 1 so that it can fit the space of the template. Currently, it falls beyond the limits. The same for Table II.

3) Please improve the readability of equation 4.

4) The sum symbol in equation 18 is too big. Please resize it.

5) In Sec. 5, I would suggest corroborating the performance results with some computational complexity analyses, so as to better highlight potential trade-offs between performance and cost. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I recommend accepting the paper

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have correctly addressed all my comments. Just a very small additional comment: Fig. 9 falls beyond the page limits and is currently cut. Please fix it.

Back to TopTop