Next Article in Journal
Effect of Repetition Rate on Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response in Younger and Middle Aged Individuals
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of native and non-native multitalker babble on speech recognition in noise
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimizing stimulus repetition rate for recording ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential elicited by air-conduction tone bursts of 500 Hz

by
Niraj Kumar Singh
*,
Peter Kadisonga
and
Palliyath Ashitha
Lecturer in Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2014, 4(1), 88; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2014.88
Submission received: 2 September 2013 / Revised: 11 April 2014 / Accepted: 23 April 2014 / Published: 3 June 2014

Abstract

Amidst several publications reporting the effects of stimulus-related parameters on ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), the effect of the repetition rate on oVEMP responses has largely gone unexplored. Studies have used a repetition rate of ~5.1 Hz mainly due to a presumption that oVEMP, like cervical VEMP, should produce best responses for ~5 Hz, although there is paucity of experimental evidence to support this hypothesis. 52 healthy individuals in the age range of 17-35 years underwent air-conduction oVEMP elicited by 500 Hz tone-bursts using seven different repetition rates (3.1, 5.1, 10.1, 15.1, 20.1, 25.1 and 30.1 Hz). The results revealed a tendency for prolongation of latencies and reduction in amplitude with increasing repetition rate. However, significantly longer latencies were observed only for 20.1 Hz and larger amplitudes for 3.1 and 5.1 Hz (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the rates of 3.1 Hz and 5.1 Hz. However 3.1 Hz produced poorer signal-to-noise ratio and required considerably longer time and thereby had lesser efficiency than 5.1 Hz (P<0.05). This would also result in higher fatigue and irritation levels considering the physical act of maintaining a supero-medial gaze. Thus the use of 5.1 Hz is recommended for clinical recording of oVEMP.
Keywords: ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential; repetition rate; tone-bursts; utricle ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential; repetition rate; tone-bursts; utricle

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, N.K.; Kadisonga, P.; Ashitha, P. Optimizing stimulus repetition rate for recording ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential elicited by air-conduction tone bursts of 500 Hz. Audiol. Res. 2014, 4, 88. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2014.88

AMA Style

Singh NK, Kadisonga P, Ashitha P. Optimizing stimulus repetition rate for recording ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential elicited by air-conduction tone bursts of 500 Hz. Audiology Research. 2014; 4(1):88. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2014.88

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Niraj Kumar, Peter Kadisonga, and Palliyath Ashitha. 2014. "Optimizing stimulus repetition rate for recording ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential elicited by air-conduction tone bursts of 500 Hz" Audiology Research 4, no. 1: 88. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2014.88

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop