Do Gender and Prior Experience Moderate the Factors Influencing Attitude toward Using Social Media for Festival Attendance?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Purpose
- (1)
- What is the nature of the relationship between PEU, PE, and PU and ATUSM?
- (2)
- What is the nature of the relationship between ATUSM and IAF?
- (3)
- Does ATUSM act as a full mediator of the impacts of PEU, PE, and PU on IAF?
- (4)
- Does gender function as a moderator of the effects of PEU, PE, and PU on ATUSM?
- (5)
- Does prior experience moderate the influences of PEU, PE, and PU on ATUSM?
1.2. Contribution of the Empirical Investigation to Current Knowledge
2. Theoretical Focus and Hypotheses and Research Model
2.1. Theoretical Focus and Hypotheses
2.2. Research Model
3. Method
3.1. Sample and Data Collection
3.2. Measurement Development
4. Results
4.1. Assessment of the Measurement Model
4.2. Assessment of the Structural Model
4.2.1. Main Effects and Hypotheses Testing
4.2.2. Mediating Effects and Hypotheses Testing
4.2.3. Moderating Effects and Hypotheses Testing
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Evaluation of Findings and Theoretical Implications
5.2. Management Implications
5.3. Limitations and Avenues for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Perceived ease of use e.g., [10,56] | PEU1. Learning how to find festival information on social media is easy to me PEU2. Social media makes it easy to find out about festivals PEU3. My interaction with social media to find out about festivals is clear and understandable PEU4. Overall, I find social media easy to use for finding out about festivals |
Perceived enjoyment e.g., [30,58] | PE1. Using social media to find out about festivals is enjoyable PE2. Using social media to find out about festivals is entertaining PE3. Using social media to find out about festivals makes me feel pleasant PE4. Using social media to find out about festivals stimulates my curiosity PE5. Using social media to find out about festivals arouses my imagination |
Perceived usefulness e.g., [30,57] | PU1. Social media is useful to find out about festivals PU2. Using social media enables me to search for information about festivals more quickly PU3. Using social media enables me to acquire more information about festivals PU4. Using social media enables me to have more accurate information about festivals PU5. Using social media enables me to access the newest information about festivals PU6. Overall, social media is useful when I am looking for information about festivals |
Attitude toward using social media e.g., [34] | ATUSM1. I like using social media to find out about festivals ATUSM2. I feel good about using social media to find out about festivals ATUSM3. Overall, I have positive attitude toward using social media to find out about festivals |
Intentions to attend festivals [10,59] | IAF1. I will attend festivals I learn about on social media in the future IAF2. I am most likely to go to the festival after having seen the event on social media IAF3. Social media solidified my decision to attend a festival |
References
- Facebook Newsroom. Available online: https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info (accessed on 7 July 2017).
- Cheng, M.; Edwards, D. Social media in tourism: A visual analytic approach. Curr. Issues Tour. 2005, 18, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilgihan, A.; Barreda, A.; Okumus, F.; Nusair, K. Consumer perception of knowledge-sharing in travel-related online social networks. Tour. Manag. 2016, 52, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridges, J.; Vásquez, C. If nearly all Airbnb reviews are positive, does that make them meaningless? Curr. Issues Tour. 2016, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Park, S. What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites. Tour. Manag. 2015, 47, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hur, K.; Kim, T.T.; Karatepe, O.M.; Lee, G. An exploration of the factors influencing social media continuance usage and information sharing intentions among Korean travelers. Tour. Manag. 2017, 63, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Guo, L.; Hu, M.; Liu, W. Influence of customer engagement with company social networks on stickiness: Mediating effect of customer value creation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017, 37, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, D.; Law, R.; Van Hoof, H.; Buhalis, D. Social media in tourism and hospitality: A literature review. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2013, 30, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuckert, M.; Liu, X.; Law, R. Hospitality and tourism online reviews: Recent trends and future directions. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2015, 32, 608–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.; Xiong, L.; Hu, C. The effect of Facebook users’ arousal and valence on intention to go to the festival: Applying an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2012, 31, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L. Online reviews: The impact of power and incidental similarity. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2015, 24, 633–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, X.; Tandford, S.; Jiang, L. Is a picture really worth a thousand words? An experiment on Facebook message effectiveness. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2017, 8, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sotiriadis, M.D. Sharing tourism experiences in social media: A literature review and a set of suggested business strategies. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 29, 179–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayeh, J.K. Travelers’ acceptance of consumer-generated media: An integrated model of technology acceptance and source credibility theories. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 48, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayeh, J.K.; Au, N.; Law, R. Predicting the intention to use consumer-generated media for travel planning. Tour. Manag. 2013, 35, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, Z.; Du, Q.; Ma, Y.; Fan, W. A comparative analysis of major online review platforms: Implications for social media analytics in hospitality and tourism. Tour. Manag. 2017, 58, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gogan, I.C.W.; Zhang, Z.; Matemba, E.D. Impacts of gratifications on consumers’ emotions and continuance use intention: An empirical study of Weibo in China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Xu, X.; Heikkilä, J.; Van der Heijden, H. Modeling hedonic is continuance through the uses and gratifications theory: An empirical study in online games. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 48, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Zhang, P. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2006, 64, 53–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Venkatesh, V.; Bala, H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 2008, 39, 273–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.L.; Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012, 36, 157–178. [Google Scholar]
- Karatepe, O.M.; Babakus, E.; Yavas, U. Does gender moderate the effects of role stress in frontline service jobs? J. Bus. Res. 2006, 59, 1087–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q. 2000, 24, 115–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karatepe, O.M. Service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty: The moderating role of gender. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2011, 12, 278–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudson, S.; Roth, M.S.; Madden, T.J.; Hudson, R. The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: An empirical study of music festival attendees. Tour. Manag. 2015, 47, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, M.Y.; Park, B. Sustainable corporate social media marketing based on message structural features: Firm size plays a significant role as a moderator. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.C.; Omran, B.A.; Cobanoglu, C. Generation Y’s positive and negative eWOM: Use of social media and mobile technology. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 29, 732–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, T.; Li, B.; Wang, D. What factors influence the sustainable tour process in social media usage? Examining a rural mountain region in Pakistan. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, J.; Kim, Y. Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Inf. Manag. 2001, 38, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J. Platform adoption factors in the internet industry. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moslehpour, M.; Pham, V.K.; Wong, W.-K.; Bilgicli, I. E-purchase intention of Taiwenese consumers: Sustainable mediation of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Sustainability 2018, 10, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, C.; Kwon, S.; Na, H.; Chang, B. Factors affecting the adoption of gamified smart tourism applications: An integrative approach. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.; Lin, J.C. Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Inf. Manag. 2008, 45, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 982–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 1993, 38, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasri, W.; Charfeddine, L. An exploration of Facebook.Com adoption in Tunisia using technology acceptance model (TAM) and theory of reasoned action (TRA). Int. J. Contemp. Res. Bus. 2012, 4, 948–968. [Google Scholar]
- Morosan, C.; Jeong, M. Users’ perceptions of two types of hotel reservation web sites. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2008, 27, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1992, 22, 1111–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, N.; Han, H.; Koo, C. Adoption of travel information in user-generated content on social media: The moderating effect of social presence. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2015, 34, 902–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, I.B. Social and personal dimensions as predictors of sustainable intention to use Facebook in Korea: An empirical analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, T.G.; Lee, J.H.; Law, R. An empirical examination of the acceptance behavior of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 500–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.-B.; Kim, T.; Shin, S.W. Modeling roles of subjective norms and eTrust in customers’ acceptance of airline B2C eCommerce websites. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46, 186–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, M.F.Y.; To, W.M. Service co-creation in social media: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 65, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacherjee, A.; Sanford, C.C. Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Q. 2006, 30, 805–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagly, A.H.; Karau, S.J.; Makhijani, M.G. Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 1995, 117, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babin, B.; Boles, J.S. Employee behavior in a service environment: A model and test of potential differences between men and women. J. Market. 1998, 62, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.-F.; Al-Gahtani, S.S.; Hu, P.J.-H. Examining gender effects in technology acceptance by Arabian workers: A survey study. PACIS 2010, 33, 85–97. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, K.Z.K.; Lee, M.K.O.; Cheung, C.M.K.; Chen, H. Understanding the role of gender in bloggers’ switching behavior. Dec. Support Syst. 2009, 47, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dincer, M.Z.; Dincer, F.S.; Alrawadieh, Z.; Mammadova, P. Examining the perceived destination image of Istanbul as represented in the travel blogs of Western travelers. In Proceedings of the 7th Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Marketing and Management (AHTMM) Conference, Famagusta, Cyprus, 10–15 July 2017; pp. 552–554. [Google Scholar]
- Boles, J.S.; Wood, J.A.; Johnson, J. Interrelationships of role conflict, role ambiguity, and work-family conflict with different facets of job satisfaction and the moderating effects of gender. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2003, 23, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, S.; Todd, P. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Q. 1995, 19, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: London, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, 3rd ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Venkatesh, V.; Speier, C.; Morris, M.G. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Dec. Sci. 2002, 33, 297–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, V.S.; Li, H. Technology acceptance model for internet banking: An invariance analysis. Inf. Manag. 2005, 42, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Franco, M.J.; Roldán, J.L. Web acceptance and usage model: A comparison between goal-directed and experiential web users. Int. Res. 2005, 15, 21–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, C. The perspective of a revised TRAM on social capital building: The case of facebook usage. Inf. Manag. 2013, 50, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed.; Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, J.W.; Rapp, A. A more comprehensive understanding and measure of customer helping behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 1998, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raudeliũnienė, J.; Davidavičienė, V.; Tvaronavičienė, M.; Jonuška, L. Evaluation of advertising campaigns on social media networks. Sustainability 2018, 10, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristics | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 78 | 40.8 |
Female | 113 | 59.2 |
Age (years) | ||
Below 20 | 4 | 2 |
21–30 | 155 | 81.2 |
31–40 | 32 | 16.8 |
Educational level | ||
Bachelor’s degree | 62 | 32.4 |
Master’s degree | 97 | 50.8 |
Doctoral degree | 32 | 16.8 |
Ethnicity | ||
White/Caucasion | 58 | 30.4 |
Hispanic/Latino | 24 | 12.6 |
Black/African-American | 17 | 8.9 |
Asian/Pacific Islanders | 79 | 41.3 |
Others | 13 | 6.8 |
Characteristics | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Social media platforms | ||
127 | 66.5 | |
18 | 9.4 | |
2 | 1.1 | |
Blogs | 10 | 5.2 |
YouTube | 32 | 16.7 |
Other platforms | 2 | 1.1 |
Using social media (years) | ||
Below 5 | 83 | 43.5 |
6–10 | 107 | 56 |
11 or above | 1 | 0.5 |
Festivals attended (multiple responses) | ||
Hi Seoul Festival | 56 | 29.3 |
Lotus Lantern Festival | 69 | 36.1 |
Boryeong Mud Festival | 44 | 23 |
Yeouido Spring Flower Festival | 63 | 33 |
Seoul International Fireworks Festival | 87 | 45.5 |
Other festivals | 73 | 38.2 |
Source of information for the festival attended (multiple responses) | ||
TV | 10 | 5.2 |
Newspaper | 5 | 2.6 |
Friends | 141 | 73.8 |
Family | 1 | 0.5 |
Social media | 190 | 99.5 |
Other sources | 22 | 11.5 |
How would you evaluate the information source you used for festivals? | ||
Very bad | 0 | 0 |
Bad | 0 | 0 |
Neutral | 38 | 19.9 |
Good | 122 | 63.9 |
Very good | 31 | 16.2 |
Social media platforms used to find about festivals (multiple responses) | ||
166 | 86.9 | |
19 | 9.9 | |
3 | 1.6 | |
Blogs | 38 | 19.9 |
YouTube | 52 | 27.2 |
Other platforms | 24 | 12.6 |
Construct | Items | AVE | CR | Alpha | Standardized Loadings | t-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perceived ease of use | PEU1 | 0.734 | 0.917 | 0.924 | 0.814 | 15.762 |
PEU2 | 0.875 | 18.515 | ||||
PEU3 | 0.858 | 17.703 | ||||
PEU4 | 0.921 | − | ||||
Perceived enjoyment | PE1 | 0.820 | 0.958 | 0.965 | 0.894 | 21.426 |
PE2 | 0.936 | − | ||||
PE3 | 0.941 | 25.697 | ||||
PE4 | 0.920 | 23.581 | ||||
PE5 | 0.909 | 22.588 | ||||
Perceived usefulness | PU1 | 0.648 | 0.902 | 0.912 | 0.863 | 15.436 |
PU2 | 0.857 | − | ||||
PU3 | 0.782 | 13.106 | ||||
PU5 | 0.779 | 13.025 | ||||
PU6 | 0.828 | 14.392 | ||||
Attitude toward using social media | ATUSM1 | 0.751 | 0.901 | 0.904 | 0.902 | − |
ATUSM2 | 0.866 | 16.859 | ||||
ATUSM3 | 0.850 | 16.269 | ||||
Intentions to attend festivals | IAF1 | 0.562 | 0.793 | 0.809 | 0.701 | 9.740 |
IAF2 | 0.810 | − | ||||
IAF3 | 0.792 | 11.133 |
Variables | PEU | PE | PU | ATUSM | IAF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perceived ease of use (PEU) | 0.734 | ||||
Perceived enjoyment (PE) | 0.605 [0.366] | 0.820 | |||
Perceived usefulness (PU) | 0.741 [0.549] | 0.528 [0.279] | 0.648 | ||
Attitude toward using social media (ATUSM) | 0.639 [0.408] | 0.573 [0.328] | 0.676 [0.457] | 0.751 | |
Intentions to attend festivals (IAF) | 0.475 [0.226] | 0.506 [0.256] | 0.502 [0.252] | 0.710 [0.504] | 0.562 |
Mean | 5.393 | 4.700 | 5.576 | 5.258 | 5.237 |
Standard deviation | 0.943 | 1.039 | 0.917 | 0.951 | 0.913 |
Paths | Gender | Unconstrained Model | Constrained Model | |||
MALE (n = 78) | FEMALE (n = 113) | |||||
Coefficient | t-Value | Coefficient | t-Value | |||
PEU → ATUSM | 0.086 | 0.540 ns | 0.164 | 0.915 ns | χ2[326] = 532.163 | χ2[327] = 532.248 a |
PE → ATUSM | 0.094 | 0.713 ns | 0.392 | 2.955 ** | χ2[326] = 532.163 | χ2[327] = 537.435 b |
PU → ATUSM | 0.685 | 5.258 ** | 0.224 | 2.473 ** | χ2[326] = 532.163 | χ2[327] = 538.479 c |
Unconstrained model fit | χ2 different test (Equivalence test) | |||||
χ2[326] = 532.163, Q = 1.632; SRMR = 0.059; RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.058 [0.049; 0.067]; TLI = 0.934; CFI = 0.943 | a. χ2[1] = 0.085 ns (H6a: Not supported) | |||||
b. χ2[1] = 5.272 * (H6b: Supported) | ||||||
c. χ2[1] = 6.316 * (H6c: Supported) | ||||||
Paths | Prior Experience | Unconstrained Model | Constrained Model | |||
EXPERT (n = 77) | NOVICE (n = 114) | |||||
Coefficient | t-Value | Coefficient | t-Value | |||
PEU → ATUSM | 0.112 | 0.709 ns | 0.139 | 0.763 ns | χ2[326] = 522.387 | χ2[327] = 522.401 a |
PE → ATUSM | 0.174 | 2.124 * | 0.409 | 3.563 ** | χ2[326] = 522.387 | χ2[327] = 526.821 b |
PU → ATUSM | 0.514 | 4.017 ** | 0.127 | 1.202 ns | χ2[326] = 522.387 | χ2[327] = 527.105 c |
Unconstrained model fit | χ2 different test (Equivalence test) | |||||
χ2[326] = 522.387, Q = 1.602; SRMR = 0.045; RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.056 [0.047; 0.065]; TLI = 0.937; CFI = 0.946 | a. χ2[1] = 0.014 ns (H7a: Not supported) | |||||
b. χ2[1] = 4.434 * (H7b: Supported) | ||||||
c. χ2[1] = 4.718 * (H7c: Supported) |
Hypotheses | Results | |
---|---|---|
Hypotheses: Direct effects | ||
H1 | Perceived ease of use → attitude toward using social media (+) | Not supported |
H2 | Perceived enjoyment → attitude toward using social media (+) | Supported |
H3 | Perceived usefulness → attitude toward using social media (+) | Supported |
H4 | Attitude toward using social media → intentions to attend festivals (+) | Supported |
Hypotheses: Mediating effects | ||
H5a | Perceived ease of use → attitude toward using social media → intentions to attend festivals (+) | Not supported |
H5b | Perceived enjoyment → attitude toward using social media → intentions to attend festivals (+) | Supported |
H5c | Perceived usefulness → attitude toward using social media → intentions to attend festivals (+) | Supported |
Gender-based hypotheses: Moderating effects | ||
H6a | Perceived ease of use → attitude toward using social media (MALE < FEMALE) | Not supported |
H6b | Perceived enjoyment → attitude toward using social media (MALE < FEMALE) | Supported |
H6c | Perceived usefulness → attitude toward using social media (MALE > FEMALE) | Supported |
Prior experience-based hypotheses: Moderating effects | ||
H7a | Perceived ease of use → attitude toward using social media (EXPERT < NOVICE) | Not supported |
H7b | Perceived enjoyment → attitude toward using social media (EXPERT < NOVICE) | Supported |
H7c | Perceived usefulness → attitude toward using social media (EXPERT > NOVICE) | Supported |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, T.T.; Karatepe, O.M.; Lee, G.; Demiral, H. Do Gender and Prior Experience Moderate the Factors Influencing Attitude toward Using Social Media for Festival Attendance? Sustainability 2018, 10, 3509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103509
Kim TT, Karatepe OM, Lee G, Demiral H. Do Gender and Prior Experience Moderate the Factors Influencing Attitude toward Using Social Media for Festival Attendance? Sustainability. 2018; 10(10):3509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103509
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Taegoo Terry, Osman M. Karatepe, Gyehee Lee, and Hande Demiral. 2018. "Do Gender and Prior Experience Moderate the Factors Influencing Attitude toward Using Social Media for Festival Attendance?" Sustainability 10, no. 10: 3509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103509