Efficiency of Energy Taxes and the Validity of the Residential Electricity Environmental Kuznets Curve in the European Union
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Contextual Background with a Literature Review
3. Data and Methods
3.1. Data
3.2. Methods
4. Results with Discussion
4.1. Results of Preliminary Analysis
4.2. Regression Results with Discussion
5. Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Variable | Constant Only | Included Trend |
---|---|---|
electricity | −4.8361 (0.000) | −3.9344 (0.000) |
Y | −13.1996 (0.000) | −16.5601 (0.000) |
Pel | −4.5705 (0.000) | −10.2379 (0.000) |
Pgas * | 101.3548 (0.000) | 70.4396 (0.045) |
educ | −5.4527 (0.000) | −11.0494 (0.000) |
tax | −3.9640(0.000) | −11.1558 (0.000) |
climate | −5.2641 (0.000) | −2.7637 (0.003) |
recession | −5.7766 (0.000) | −4.1718 (0.000) |
poverty * | 115.3862 (0.000) | 102.1867 (0.000) |
Electricity | Y | Pel | Pgas | Tax | Poverty | Educ | Climate | Recession | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
electricity | 1.000 | ||||||||
Y | 0.681 * | 1.000 | |||||||
Pel | 0.318 * | 0.691 * | 1.000 | ||||||
Pgas | 0.619 * | 0.653 * | 0.788 * | 1.000 | |||||
tax | −0.077 | −0.204* | −0.049 | 0.016 | 1.000 | ||||
poverty | −0.449 * | −0.47 * | −0.358 * | −0.378 * | 0.020 | 1.000 | |||
educ | 0.503 * | 0.526 * | 0.294 * | 0.342 * | −0.117 * | −0.108 * | 1.000 | ||
recession ** | 0.003 | 0.065 | 0.177 * | 0.171 * | −0.021 | 0.074 | 0.001 | 1.000 | |
climate ** | 0.528 * | 0.169 * | −0.032 | 0.229 * | 0.051 | −0.144 * | 0.294 * | 0.028 | 1.000 |
References
- European Commission. Energy 2020: A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy; 10.11.2010 COM(2010) 639 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. A Roadmap for Moving to a Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050; 8.3.2011 COM/2011/0112 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030; 22.01.2014 COM/2014/015 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Eurostat, Database on Energy. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/energy/data/main-tables (accessed on 20 December 2018).
- Sterner, T.; Koehlin, G. Environmental Taxes in Europe. Public Financ. Manag. 2003, 1, 117–142. [Google Scholar]
- Clemente, J. Europe’s Energy and Electricity Policies Are a Bad Model. Forbes. 27 December 2015. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/judeclemente/2015/12/27/europes-energy-and-electricity-policies-are-a-bad-model/#1bdd13623c02 (accessed on 26 March 2018).
- Alberini, A.; Filippini, M. Response of residential electricity demand to price: The effect of measurement error. Energy Econ. 2011, 33, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ozturk, I. A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy 2010, 8, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouoiyour, J.; Selmi, R.; Ozturk, I. The nexus between electricity consumption and economic growth: New insights from meta-analysis. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2014, 4, 621–635. [Google Scholar]
- Suri, V.; Chapman, D. Economic growth, trade and energy: Implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 1988, 5, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luzzati, T.; Orsini, M. Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve. Energy 2009, 34, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pablo-Romero, M.P.; De Jesus, J. Economic growth and energy consumption: The energy-environmental Kuznets curve for Latin America and the Caribbean. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 60, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aruga, K. Does the Energy-Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Sustain in the Asia-Pacific Region? MPRA Paper 80692; University Library of Munich: Munich, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Pablo-Romero, M.; Sanchez-Brada, A. Residential energy environmental Kuznets curve in the EU-28. Energy 2017, 125, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yin, H.; Zhou, H.; Zhu, K. Long- and short-run elasticities of residential electricity consumption in China: A partial adjustment model with panel data. Appl. Econ. 2016, 48, 2587–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Hao, Y.; Liao, H. The relationship between residential electricity consumption and income: A piecewise linear model with panel data. Energies 2016, 9, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labandeira, X.; Labeaga, J.M.; Lopez-Otero, X. A meta-analysis on the price elasticity of energy demand. Energy Policy 2017, 102, 549–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morley, B. Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2012, 19, 1817–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lapinskiene, G.; Peleckis, K.; Nedelko, Z. Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of enterprise’s sustainability and other factors on GHG in European countries. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2017, 18, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumol, W.J.; Oates, W.E. The Theory of Environmental Taxation, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Bosquet, B. Environmental tax reform: Does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 34, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stern, D.I. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 2004, 32, 1419–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speck, S. The design of carbon and broad-based energy taxes in European countries. Vt. J. Environ. Law 2008, 10, 31–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freiere-Gonzales, J. Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: A critical review. J. Policy Model. 2017, 40, 194–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bye, T.; Bruvoll, A. Taxing Energy—Why and How? The Present Policies across Western Countries. Statistics Norway July 2008, Reports 2008/28. Available online: https://www.ssb.no/a/english/publikasjoner/pdf/rapp_200828_en/rapp_200828_en.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2018).
- Markandya, A. Environmental taxation: What have we learnt in the last 30 years? In Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform. Central Issues in Contemporary Economic Theory and Policy; Castellucci, L., Markandya, A., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2012; pp. 9–37. [Google Scholar]
- Gago, A.; Labandeira, X.; Otero, X.L. A panorama on energy taxes and green tax reforms. Hacienda Pública Española 2014, 208, 145–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kosonen, K.; Nicodeme, G. The Role of Fiscal Instrument in Environmental Policy. Taxation Paper 19. 2009. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/economic_analysis/tax_papers/taxation_paper_19.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2018).
- De Mooij, R.A.; Parry, I.; Keen, M. (Eds.) Fiscal Policy to Mitigate Climate Change; International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, S.J.; Vela, M.A. Are Environmentally Related Taxes Effective? Inter-American Development Bank Working Series: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Aigner, R. Environmental Taxation and Redistribution Concern; Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods: Bonn, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). The Political Economy of Environmentally Related Taxes; OECD: Paris, France, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Oueslati, W.; Zippererb, V.; Rousselierec, D.; Dimitropoulosa, A. Energy taxes, reforms and income inequality: An empirical cross-country analysis. Int. Econ. 2017, 150, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossman, G.; Krueger, A. Economic growth and the environment. Q. J. Econ. 1995, 110, 353–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auci, S.; Trovato, G. The environmental Kuznets curve within European countries and sectors; greenhouse emission, production function and technology. Econ. Politica 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazur, A.; Phutkaradze, Z.; Phutkaradze, J. Economic growth and environmental quality in the European Union countries–is there evidence for the environmental Kuznets curve. Int. J. Manag. Econ. 2015, 45, 108–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kounetas, K.E. Examining the Convergence Hypothesis in Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Carbonization Index. Evidence from EU Countries. SSRN Electron. J. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hertwich, E.G.; Roux, C. Greenhouse gas emissions from the consumption of electric and electronic equipment by Norwegian households. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 8190–8196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- To, W.M.; Lee, P.K.C. GHG emissions from electricity consumption: A case study of Hong Kong from 2002 to 2015 and trends to 2030. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 165, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lechtenboehmer, S.; Schuering, A. The potential for large scale savings from insulating residential buildings in the EU. Energy Effic. 2009, 4, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database; International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC, USA, October 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Baltagi, B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Roodman, D. How to do xtbond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J. 2009, 9, 86–136. [Google Scholar]
- Borozan, D. Regional-level household energy consumption determinants: The European perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekins, P.; Speck, S. Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe. Environ. Res. Econ. 1999, 13, 369–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azevedo, I.M.L.; Morgan, M.G.; Lave, L. Residential and regional electricity consumption in the U.S. and EU: How much will higher prices reduce CO2 emissions? Electr. J. 2011, 24, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espey, J.A.; Espey, M. Turning on the lights: A meta-analysis of residential electricity demand elasticities. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2004, 36, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filipovic, S.; Verbic, M.; Radovanovic, M. Determinants of energy intensity in the European Union: A panel data analysis. Energy 2015, 92, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pye, S.; Dobbins, A.; Baffert, C.; Brajkovic, J.; Grgurev, I.; de Miglio, R.; Deane, P. Energy poverty and vulnerable consumers in the energy sector across the EU: Analysis of policies and measures. Policy Rep. 2015, 2, 1–48. [Google Scholar]
- Bertoldi, P.; Lopez Lorente, J.; Labanca, N. Energy Consumption and Energy Efficiency Trends in the EU-28 (2000–2014); Joint Research Centre: Ispra, Italy, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kavousian, A.; Rajagopal, R.; Fischer, M. Determinants of residential electricity consumption: Using smart meter data to examine the effect of climate, building characteristics, appliance stock, and occupants. Energy 2013, 55, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, A.; Fonseca, P.; Schlomann, B.; Feilberg, N. Characterization of the household electricity consumption in the EU, potential energy savings and specific policy recommendations. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 1884–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Poortinga, W.; Steg, L.; Vlek, C. Values, environmental concern and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environ. Behav. 2004, 36, 70–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatersleben, B.; Steg, L.; Vlek, C. Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environ. Behav. 2002, 34, 335–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Symbol | Obs | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Household electricity consumption (kWh per capita; tsdpc310, tps00001) | electricity | 336 | 1650.64 | 842.04 | 431.85 | 4.922.77 | |
Real GDP per capita (const EUR; tec00001) | Y | 336 | 24,873.38 | 16,480.54 | 4181.50 | 84,368.38 | 3.62 |
Electricity prices for medium-sized households (const EUR_centi per kWh; ten00117) | Pel | 336 | 15.68 | 5.10 | 6.88 | 29.16 | 4.08 |
Natural gas prices for medium-sized households (const EUR per GJ; ten00118) | Pgas | 292 | 15.358 | 5.95 | 5.10 | 35.90 | 3.28 |
Education—% of population from 15 to 64 with tertiary education (edat_lfs_9903) | educ | 336 | 23.55 | 7.40 | 9.1 | 39.6 | 1.67 |
Recession dummy (1 if real GDP fell in the current year compared with the previous one; 0 otherwise; tec00001) | recession | 336 | 0.24 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.08 |
Climate conditions (1 if a country has more than 2200 HDD; 0 otherwise; nrg_chdd) | climate | 336 | 0.095 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.20 |
Energy taxes (% of GDP; env_ac_tax) | tax | 336 | 1.91 | 0.42 | 1.11 | 3.13 | 1.14 |
At-risk-of poverty rate (%; ilc_peps01) | poverty | 331 | 16.307 | 3.830 | 8.6 | 26.4 | 1.44 |
Model Type | Model 1: Fixed | Model 2: Fixed | Model 3: Random | Model 4: Random | Model 5: Dynamic | Model 6: Dynamic | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Estimated Coefficient | Robust St.err. | Estimated Coefficient | Robust St.err. | Estimated Coefficient | Robust St.err. | Estimated Coefficient | Robust St.err. | Estimated Coefficient | Robust St.err. | Estimated Coefficient | Robust St.err. |
electricity (t − 1) | 0.917 * | 0.037 | 0.856 * | 0.058 | ||||||||
Y | 2.797 * | 0.988 | 2.699 ** | 1.010 | 0.333 * | 0.071 | 2.151 ** | 1.037 | 0.034 *** | 0.019 | 1.620 ** | 0.593 |
Y2 | −0.137 ** | 0.051 | −0.131 ** | 0.052 | −0.094 ** | 0.053 | −0.078 ** | 0.029 | ||||
Pel | −0.186 * | 0.063 | −0.177 * | 0.062 | −0.064 * | 0.020 | −0.131 * | 0.039 | ||||
Pgas | 0.046 | 0.045 | 0.041 | 0.048 | 0.019 | 0.024 | 0.027 | 0.033 | ||||
recession | 0.018 ** | 0.008 | 0.015 | 0.009 | 0.015 | 0.010 | −0.005 | 0.007 | ||||
climate | 0.063 * | 0.017 | 0.069 * | 0.019 | 0.039 * | 0.016 | 0.058 ** | 0.028 | ||||
tax | 0.021 | 0.022 | 0.082 ** | 0.039 | 0.077 *** | 0.041 | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.023 | 0.034 | ||
poverty | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | ||||
educ | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.001 | −0.001 *** | 0.001 | ||||
const | −6.875 | 4.913 | −6.572 | 4.937 | 4.144 * | 0.700 | −4.558 | 5.078 | 0.376 | 0.221 | −7.133 ** | 2.828 |
Number of obs. | 336 | 336 | 287 | 287 | 264 | 264 | ||||||
Number of groups/Instruments | 28 | 28 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | ||||||
R2-between | 0.277 | 0.358 | 0.583 | 0.594 | ||||||||
Wald χ2F-test | F(2, 27) = 4.68; p = 0.018 | F(3, 27) = 3,85; p = 0.020 | Wald χ2(8) = 37.44; p = 0.000 | Wald χ2(9) = 38.56; p = 0.000 | F(9, 24) = 1173.77; p = 0.000 | F(10, 24) = 267.97; p = 0.000 | ||||||
AR(1) | Z = −2.44; p = 0.015 | Z = −2.59; p = 0.010 | ||||||||||
AR(2) | Z = 1.62; p = 0.105 | Z = 1.31; p = 0.190 | ||||||||||
Hausman test/Hansen J test | Hausman test: 14.47; p = 0.001 | Hausman test: 11.04; p = 0.012 | Hausman test: 1.41; p = 0.994 | Hausman test: 10.02; p = 0.349 | Hansen J test: χ2(15) = 19.47 p = 0.193 | Hansen J test: χ2(14) = 18.74: p = 0.175 |
© 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Borozan, D. Efficiency of Energy Taxes and the Validity of the Residential Electricity Environmental Kuznets Curve in the European Union. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072464
Borozan D. Efficiency of Energy Taxes and the Validity of the Residential Electricity Environmental Kuznets Curve in the European Union. Sustainability. 2018; 10(7):2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072464
Chicago/Turabian StyleBorozan, Djula. 2018. "Efficiency of Energy Taxes and the Validity of the Residential Electricity Environmental Kuznets Curve in the European Union" Sustainability 10, no. 7: 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072464
APA StyleBorozan, D. (2018). Efficiency of Energy Taxes and the Validity of the Residential Electricity Environmental Kuznets Curve in the European Union. Sustainability, 10(7), 2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072464