A SEM–Neural Network Approach to Predict Customers’ Intention to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in China’s Zhejiang Province
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Background of Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) Development in China
1.2. Research Questions and Objectives
2. Literature Reviews and Related Works
2.1. Purchase Intentions for a Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV)
2.2. Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
2.3. Neural Network (NN)
3. Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses Justification
3.1. Attitude, Perceived Behavioral Control, and Subject Norm
3.2. Environmental Performance
3.3. Price Value
3.4. Government Incentive Policy Measures
3.5. Research Model Development
4. Methodology
4.1. Sample and Procedure
4.2. Partial Least Squares (PLS)-SEM and NN Approach
4.3. Evaluation of the Measurement Model
5. Analytical of Results
5.1. Assessment of the Measurement Model
5.2. Factor Analysis and Construct Reliability
5.3. Structural Model PLS Results
5.4. Neural Network Analysis
6. Discussions
7. Conclusions
7.1. Managerial Implications
7.2. Practical/Social Implications
7.2.1. Demonstrate, Promote, and Strengthen the Role of BEVs in Environmental Protection
7.2.2. Strengthen the NMIP Measures of BEVs
7.2.3. Establish an Elastic System of MIP Measures
7.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Constructs | Item | References |
---|---|---|
Attitude (ATT) | Purchasing a battery electric vehicle (BEV) is a good idea. (ATT1) | Paul et al. [41] |
I think it is very necessary to use BEVs. (ATT2) | ||
I think purchasing a BEV is wise. (ATT3) | ||
Perceived behavioral control (PBC) | If I wanted, I could have purchased an energy conservation and environmentally friendly BEV. (PBC1) | Paul et al. [41] |
If it were entirely up to me, I am confident that I will choose a BEV for my next purchase. (PBC2) | ||
I will have the ability to purchase an energy conservation and environmentally friendly BEV in the near future. (PBC3) | ||
Subject norm (SN) | Most people who are important to me (such as family members and friends) think I should purchase a BEV when buying a new vehicle. (SN1) | Nayum and Klöckner [58] |
Many of the people who are important to me (such as family members and friends) like to own a BEV. (SN2) | ||
If people around me (such as family members and friends) use BEVs, this will encourage me to buy. (SN3) | ||
Environmental performance (EP) | BEVs will contribute to environmental sustainability. (EP1) | McCarty and Shrum [59] |
BEVs will promote to reduce environmental pollution. (EP2) | ||
BEVs are important to save natural resources. (EP3) | ||
Price value (PV) | BEVs are reasonably priced. (PV1) | Venkatesh and Goyal [21] |
BEVs are a good value for the money. (PV2) | ||
At the current price, BEVs provide a good value. (PV3) | ||
Non-monetary incentives policy (NMIP) | Separate allocations of BEVs license plates. (NMIP1) | Zhang et al. [15] |
Abolish traffic restrictions on BEVs. (NMIP2) | ||
Implement the right to use bus lanes (The policy had not been implemented in Zhejiang Province, China yet, but some municipalities in China, such as Beijing City, have already put it into practice). (NMIP3) | ||
Monetary incentive policy measures (MIP) | Implement purchase subsidy for BEVs. (MIP1) | Zhang et al. [15] |
Increase the allowable loan amounts for purchasing BEVs. (MIP2) | ||
Implement tax exemption policy for the purchase of BEVs. (MIP3) | ||
Provide preferential insurance policy for the purchase of BEVs. (MIP4) | ||
Purchase intention (PI) | If BEVs are beneficial, I would recommend them to my friends. (PI1) | Nayum and Klöckner [58] |
I expect more brands and models of BEVs to be introduced to the market. (PI2) | ||
When I purchased a new vehicle, I planned to purchase an environmentally friendly BEV. (PI3) |
References
- Xie, P.J.; Sun, F.H.; Wang, L.G.; Liu, P.K. A review on China’s energy storage industry under the “Internet plus” initiative. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 717–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lane, B.; Potter, S. The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: Exploring the consumer attitude-action gap. J. Clean Prod. 2007, 15, 1085–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beresteanu, A.; Li, S.J. Gasoline prices, government support, and the demand for hybrid vehicles in the United States. Int. Econ. Rev. 2001, 52, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra, A.; Gulati, S.; Kandlikar, M. Green drivers or free riders? An analysis of tax rebates for hybrid vehicles. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2010, 60, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.Q.; Ge, J.P. Electric vehicle development in Beijing: An analysis of consumer purchase intention. J. Clean Prod. 2019, 216, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China (MEEPRC). China Vehicle Environmental Management Annual Report. Available online: http://dqhj.mep.gov.cn/jdchjgl/zhgldt/201806/P020180604354753261746.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2018).
- Li, C.J.; Negnevitsky, M.; Wang, X.J. Review of methanol vehicle policies in China: Current status and future implications. Energy Procedia 2019, 160, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, D.F.; Lin, X.; Xu, T.Y. The evolution of China’s new energy vehicle industry from the perspective of a technology–market–policy framework. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okada, T.; Tamaki, T.; Managi, S. Effect of environmental awareness on purchase intention and satisfaction pertaining to electric vehicles in Japan. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 67, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Un-Noor, F.; Padmanaban, S.; Mihet-Popa, L.; Mollah, M.; Hossain, E. A comprehensive study of key electric vehicle (EV) components, technologies, challenges, impacts, and future direction of development. Energies 2017, 10, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stambouli, A.B.; Traversa, E. Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs): A review of an environmentally clean and efficient source of energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2002, 6, 433–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.S.; Sperling, D.; Tal, G.; Fang, H.F. China’s electric car surge. Energy Policy 2017, 102, 486–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, F.; Dai, H.C.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, N. Economic Analysis of Emerging Integrated Energy Service Market in China: A Theoretical View. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), Beijing, China, 20–22 October 2018; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, H.M.; Wang, M.Q.; Wang, H.W. New energy vehicles in China: Policies, demonstration, and progress. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2013, 18, 207–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, K.; Hao, Y.; Fan, J.L.; Wei, Y.M. The impact of government policy on preference for NEVs: The evidence from China. Energy Policy 2013, 61, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.H.; Wang, C.; Hao, Y. Influencing factors of private purchasing intentions of new energy vehicles in China. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2013, 5, 063133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.H.; Zhan, W.J.; Hu, Y.Y. Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: The roles of perception and personality. J. Clean Prod. 2018, 204, 1060–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, C.; Guo, H.D.; Jin, S.Q.; Yang, J. Outsourcing agricultural production: Evidence from rice farmers in Zhejiang province. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babones, S. Variety of development: Chinese automakers in market reform and globalization, by Qiushi Feng. Asian J. Soc. Sci. 2018, 46, 775–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). Report on the Implementation of the 2018 Plan for National Economic and Social Development and on the 2019 Draft Plan for National Economic and Social Development. Available online: https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/2019NPC_NDRCReport_EN.pdf?mod=article_inline (accessed on 5 March 2019).
- Venkatesh, V.; Goyal, S. Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption: Polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. MIS Q. 2010, 34, 281–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chong, A.Y.L.; Chan, F.T.; Ooi, K.B. Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: Cross country empirical examination between China and Malaysia. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 53, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garson, G.D. Neural Networks: An Introductory Guide for Social Scientists; Sage: London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Chong, A.Y.L. Predicting m-commerce adoption determinants: A neural network approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andwari, A.M.; Pesiridis, A.; Rajoo, S.; Martinez-Botas, R.; Esfahanian, V. A review of battery electric vehicle technology and readiness levels. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.K.; Freese, D.; Cabrera, A.; Kitch, W.A. Electric vehicles’ energy consumption measurement and estimation. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2015, 34, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Chen, M.Z.; Zhang, W.Y. A novel location-routing problem in electric vehicle transportation with stochastic demands. J. Clean Prod. 2019, 221, 567–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezvani, Z.; Jansson, J.; Bodin, J. Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2015, 34, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, B.H.; Morwitz, V.G. Stated intentions and purchase behavior: A unified model. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2010, 27, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bunce, L.; Harris, M.; Burgess, M. Charge up then charge out? Drivers’ perceptions and experiences of electric vehicles in the UK. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2014, 59, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axsen, J.; Mountain, D.C.; Jaccard, M. Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles. Resour. Energy Econ. 2009, 31, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Egnér, F.; Trosvik, L. Electric vehicle adoption in Sweden and the impact of local policy instruments. Energy Policy 2018, 121, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Langbroek, J.H.; Franklin, J.P.; Susilo, Y.O. The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy 2016, 94, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mau, P.; Eyzaguirre, J.; Jaccard, M.; Collins-Dodd, C.; Tiedemann, K. The “neighbor effect”: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 68, 504–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Hao, C.X.; Chai, Y.N. Life cycle assessment of commercial delivery trucks: Diesel, plug-In electric, and battery-swap electric. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior; Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Leonard, L.N.; Cronan, T.P.; Kreie, J. What influences IT ethical behavior intentions—planned behavior, reasoned action, perceived importance, or individual characteristics? Inf. Manag. 2004, 42, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yazdanpanah, M.; Forouzani, M. Application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict Iranian students’ intention to purchase organic food. J. Clean Prod. 2015, 107, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers: Evidences from a developing nation. Appetite 2016, 96, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paul, J.; Modi, A.; Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 29, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Degirmenci, K.; Breitner, M.H. Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range? Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2017, 51, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ritter, Á.M.; Borchardt, M.; Vaccaro, G.L.; Pereira, G.M.; Almeida, F. Motivations for promoting the consumption of green products in an emerging country: Exploring attitudes of Brazilian consumers. J. Clean Prod. 2015, 106, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, P.; Huang, H.; Ran, B.; Zhan, F.P.; Shi, Y.J. Exploring the factors affecting mode choice Intention of autonomous vehicle based on an extended theory of planned behavior—A case study in China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haykin, S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation; Prentice Hall PTR: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Chiang, W.Y.K.; Zhang, D.S.; Zhou, L. Predicting and explaining patronage behavior toward web and traditional stores using neural networks: A comparative analysis with logistic regression. Decis. Support Syst. 2006, 41, 514–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammerstrom, D. Working with neural networks. IEEE Spectr. 1993, 30, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, A.T. Back-propagation neural networks for modeling complex systems. Artif. Intell. Eng. 1995, 9, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, J.E.; Walczak, S. Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: Assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance. Inf. Manag. 2009, 46, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clements, M.P.; Franses, P.H.; Swanson, N.R. Forecasting economic and financial time-series with non-linear models. Int. J. Forecast. 2004, 20, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Granger, C.W.; Terasvirta, T. Modelling Non-Linear Economic Relationships; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, M.F. Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people’s energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan–moral obligation matters. J. Clean Prod. 2016, 112, 1746–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brody, S.; Grover, H.; Vedlitz, A. Examining the willingness of Americans to alter behavior to mitigate climate change. Clim. Policy 2012, 12, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gleim, M.R.; Smith, J.S.; Andrews, D.; Cronin, J.J., Jr. Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. J. Retail. 2013, 89, 44–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laroche, M.; Bergeron, J.; Barbaro-Forleo, G. Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J. Consum. Mark. 2001, 18, 503–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Palos-Sanchez, P.; Saura, J.R.; Martin-Velicia, F. A study of the effects of programmatic advertising on users’ concerns about privacy overtime. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 96, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lomax, R.G.; Schumacker, R.E. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Nayum, A.; Klöckner, C.A. A comprehensive socio-psychological approach to car type choice. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014, 40, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCarty, J.A.; Shrum, L.J. The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. J. Bus. Res. 1994, 30, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liébana-Cabanillas, F.; Marinković, V.; Kalinić, Z.A. SEM-neural network approach for predicting antecedents of m-commerce acceptance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017, 37, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chong, A.Y.L. A two-staged SEM-neural network approach for understanding and predicting the determinants of m-commerce adoption. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 1240–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyes-Menendez, A.; Palos-Sanchez, P.R.; Saura, J.R.; Martin-Velicia, F. Understanding the influence of wireless communications and Wi-Fi access on customer loyalty: A behavioral model system. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2018, 3487398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis; Pearson University Press: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Cronbach, L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16, 297–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2014, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sexton, R.S.; Johnson, R.A.; Hignite, M.A. Predicting Internet/e-commerce use. Internet Res. 2002, 12, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyndman, R.J.; Koehler, A.B. Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. Int. J. Forecast. 2006, 22, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leong, L.Y.; Hew, T.S.; Tan, G.W.H.; Ooi, K.B. Predicting the determinants of the NFC-enabled mobile credit card acceptance: A neural networks approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 5604–5620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, D.; Yábar, D.P.B.; Saura, J.R. University Incubators May Be Socially Valuable, but How Effective Are They? A Case Study on Business Incubators at Universities. In Entrepreneurial Universities; Peris-Ortiz, M., Gómez, J., Merigó-Lindahl, J., Rueda-Armengot, C., Eds.; Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 165–177. [Google Scholar]
Author | Research Aims |
---|---|
Mau et al. [35] | To find the dynamics of consumer preferences by modeling the discrete choice, with the data collected from two national surveys related to new vehicle technologies in Canada. |
Axsen et al. [32] | To investigate the “neighbor effect” on hybrid-electric vehicles by using stated preference and revealed preference choice. |
Bunce et al. [31] | To evaluate the attitudes and experiences of 135 drivers after driving EV for 3 months trial in a UK Ultra Low Carbon Vehicle. |
Egnér and Trosvik [33] | Using panel data to test the influence of local policy measurements to encourage the electric vehicles’ adoption in Sweden. |
Huang and Ge [5] | To present the mechanism model of electric vehicles’ purchase intention under the theory of planned behavior, and analyze the factors using SEM. |
Respondents’ Characteristics | Item | Frequency (n = 382) | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 179 | 46.90 |
Female | 203 | 53.10 | |
Age | 18–25 | 105 | 27.50 |
26–33 | 115 | 30.10 | |
34–41 | 54 | 14.10 | |
42–49 | 62 | 16.20 | |
50–57 | 39 | 10.20 | |
Older than 58 | 7 | 1.80 | |
Family size | 1 person | 6 | 1.60 |
2–3 persons | 211 | 55.20 | |
4–5 persons | 129 | 33.80 | |
More than 5 persons | 36 | 9.40 | |
Education level | High school and below | 31 | 8.10 |
Technical secondary school | 10 | 2.60 | |
Junior college | 54 | 14.10 | |
Undergraduate course | 199 | 52.10 | |
Master | 72 | 18.80 | |
Doctor | 16 | 4.20 | |
The total family income from all sources before taxes | ¥100,000 and below | 76 | 19.90 |
¥110,000–200,000 | 142 | 37.20 | |
¥210,000–400,000 | 103 | 27.00 | |
¥410,000–600,000 | 26 | 6.80 | |
¥610,000 and above | 35 | 9.20 | |
BEVs owned in the household | Yes | 13 | 3.40 |
No | 369 | 96.60 | |
Willing to pay for a BEV | ¥100,000 and below | 125 | 32.70 |
¥110,000–200,000 | 162 | 42.40 | |
¥210,000–300,000 | 64 | 16.80 | |
¥310,000–400,000 | 17 | 4.50 | |
¥410,000–500,000 | 6 | 1.60 | |
¥510,000 and above | 8 | 2.10 | |
Planning to buy a BEV in the coming 2 or 3 years | Yes | 98 | 25.70 |
No | 284 | 74.30 |
Factor Loadings | α | CR | AVE | R2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attitude (ATT) | 0.911–0.935 | 0.915 | 0.947 | 0.856 | |
Perceived behavioral control (PBC) | 0.762–0.882 | 0.786 | 0.875 | 0.701 | |
Subject norm (SN) | 0.816–0.896 | 0.826 | 0.900 | 0.750 | |
Purchase intention (PI) | 0.823–0.850 | 0.784 | 0.879 | 0.707 | 0.694 |
Environmental performance (EP) | 0.937–0.965 | 0.945 | 0.965 | 0.901 | |
Price value (PV) | 0.846–0.917 | 0.857 | 0.914 | 0.779 | |
Non-monetary incentive policy (NMIP) | 0.823–0.918 | 0.856 | 0.912 | 0.777 | |
Monetary incentive policy measures (MIP) | 0.847–0.955 | 0.939 | 0.957 | 0.847 |
ATT | PBC | SN | PI | EP | PV | NMIP | MIP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attitude (ATT) | 0.925 | |||||||
Perceived behavioral control (PBC) | 0.727 *** | 0.837 | ||||||
Subject norm (SN) | 0.647 *** | 0.644 *** | 0.866 | |||||
Purchase intention (PI) | 0.705 *** | 0.761 *** | 0.635 *** | 0.841 | ||||
Environmental performance (EP) | 0.505 *** | 0.479 *** | 0.457 *** | 0.599 *** | 0.949 | |||
Price value (PV) | 0.558 *** | 0.513 *** | 0.543 *** | 0.552 *** | 0.459 *** | 0.883 | ||
Non-monetary inc. policy (NMIP) | 0.269 *** | 0.273 *** | 0.270 *** | 0.323 *** | 0.440 *** | 0.296 *** | 0.881 | |
Monetary inc. policy measures (MIP) | 0.454 *** | 0.353 *** | 0.363 *** | 0.464 *** | 0.419 *** | 0.457 *** | 0.675 *** | 0.920 |
Hypothesis | Mean | T-Statistics | Standard Deviation | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|
H1: Attitude -> Purchase intention | 0.135 | 2.394 | 0.055 | ** |
H2: Perceived behavioral control -> Purchase intention | 0.447 | 9.777 | 0.046 | *** |
H3: Subject norm -> Purchase intention | 0.098 | 2.374 | 0.043 | ** |
H4: Environmental performance -> Purchase intention | 0.199 | 4.776 | 0.042 | *** |
H5: Price value -> Purchase intention | 0.050 | 1.452 | 0.034 | n.s. |
H6: Non-monetary inc. policy measures -> Purchase intention | −0.011 | 0.326 | 0.034 | n.s. |
H7: Monetary inc. policy measures -> Purchase intention | 0.102 | 2.655 | 0.039 | *** |
Neural Network | Training | Testing |
---|---|---|
ANN1 | 0.074 | 0.076 |
ANN2 | 0.085 | 0.104 |
ANN3 | 0.071 | 0.087 |
ANN4 | 0.068 | 0.078 |
ANN5 | 0.086 | 0.096 |
ANN6 | 0.067 | 0.108 |
ANN7 | 0.081 | 0.104 |
ANN8 | 0.072 | 0.102 |
ANN9 | 0.078 | 0.062 |
ANN10 | 0.079 | 0.088 |
Average | 0.018 | 0.022 |
Standard deviation | 0.002 | 0.004 |
Predictors | Normalized Importance (%) |
---|---|
Attitude | 76.10 |
Perceived behavioral control | 100 |
Subject norm | 84.69 |
Environmental performance | 77.80 |
Monetary incentive policy measures | 50 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Xu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Bao, H.; Zhang, S.; Xiang, Y. A SEM–Neural Network Approach to Predict Customers’ Intention to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in China’s Zhejiang Province. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3164. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113164
Xu Y, Zhang W, Bao H, Zhang S, Xiang Y. A SEM–Neural Network Approach to Predict Customers’ Intention to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in China’s Zhejiang Province. Sustainability. 2019; 11(11):3164. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113164
Chicago/Turabian StyleXu, Yueling, Wenyu Zhang, Haijun Bao, Shuai Zhang, and Ying Xiang. 2019. "A SEM–Neural Network Approach to Predict Customers’ Intention to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in China’s Zhejiang Province" Sustainability 11, no. 11: 3164. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113164
APA StyleXu, Y., Zhang, W., Bao, H., Zhang, S., & Xiang, Y. (2019). A SEM–Neural Network Approach to Predict Customers’ Intention to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in China’s Zhejiang Province. Sustainability, 11(11), 3164. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113164