Energy Security Pattern Spatiotemporal Evolution and Strategic Analysis of G20 Countries

Abstract

With the consumption of energy, blackouts, and a series of social development problems, the discussion of energy security has become the focus of international attention. This paper aims to construct a universal multidimensional index system from four dimensions, and compare the energy security systems of different countries by measuring the Energy Security Index (ESI) of 19 countries of G20 and analyzing their evolution characteristics. The results of this paper show that the ESI of the G20 countries is increasing, the number of dangerous countries is decreasing, mainly concentrated in the Asian and African regions, and environmental sustainability and safety use are the main factors affecting their energy security. The security countries are mainly concentrated in the developed countries of the Americas and Europe. Since 1995, the ESI of China has continued to rise and now China is a generally safe country, which reflects China’s continuous optimization of energy structure and continuous improvement of the relationship of energy systems and economic, population, and environmental systems.

1. Introduction

Energy is the driving force for the development of human society and an important foundation for the national economy, national security, and sustainable development. With the progress of human civilization, the issue of energy security, which concerns economic development, social stability, and national security, has become a focus of increasing concern. With the expansion of energy supply types, the concept of energy security is not limited to the security of energy supply, but should also include the safety of energy use. In other words, it is necessary to provide users with high-quality and safe energy in a sustained and stable manner, and at the same time, it is necessary to meet the coordination between energy use and the environment and society, so as to prevent energy from polluting the environment and affecting the sustainable development of society in the process of energy use.

As time goes on, the concept of energy security expands in both scope and depth and becomes more complex. It is a linkage effect interacting with multiple systems such as resource reserve, geographical location, economic development, political situation, and environment. As early as the beginning of the 20th century, the International Energy Agency (IEA) believed that energy security was mainly reflected in stabilizing oil security, ensuring oil supply, and maintaining price stability [1]. Later, because the supply of energy is not only affected by resources, but also by the supply chain, scholars further cover energy security to energy infrastructure and supply chain security [2]. With global integration and diversification of energy sources, the supply of energy security is not limited to the supply of oil. As for the different status of energy exporting and importing countries in the energy market, the assessment of energy security also extends from a single supply security conducive to the security of energy exporting countries to multiple fields such as the economy, environment, and social security. Due to the differences in energy reserves, consumption levels and power consumption policies between different countries in time and space, the energy security status of different countries is also different.

The paper is organized as follows. The second part serves as a literature review. The third part introduces the establishment of the index system. The fourth part introduces the evaluation process of energy security. The fifth part carries out case demonstration, scenario analysis, and gives suggestions. Finally, the sixth part offers conclusions.

2. Literature Review

As a comprehensive attribute reflecting the regional energy system, the concept of energy security is not clearly defined internationally due to its regional and multi-dimensional characteristics. Currently, the “4A” concept of energy security proposed by the Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) [3] is internationally recognized, namely, availability, accessibility, affordability, and acceptability. These four are not isolated from each other, but have a complex interaction relationship.

According to the research results of domestic and foreign scholars, the following conclusions are summarized as shown in Table 1:

Table 1. Comparison of literatures on energy security evaluation.

Author	Dimensions	Analysis Object	Indicators List by Frequency of Occurrence
B.W. Ang et al. [4]	economic, energy supply chain and environmental	Singapore	Reserve-production ratio Energy intensity Oil price The index of diversification of production Self-sufficiency rate The proportion of fossil fuels in energy consumption Carbon intensity Per capita energy consumption External dependence The proportion of renewable energy generation Political stability The index of PM2.5 Per capita installed capacity The index of diversification of consumption Energy supply efficiency The proportion of imported energy Availability of energy on the international market Electrified rate The rate of line loss Infrastructure Stability of electricity prices Land use Economic vulnerability index Water resources
Kapil Narula et al. [5]	availability, affordability, efficiency, acceptability	Developing countries
Burgherr, P et al. [6]	energy security, sustainability and risk aversion	OECD, EU, and none OECD members
Lixia Yao et al. [7]	availability, applicability, acceptability, affordability	China.
Benjamin K et al. [8]	20 dimensions such as availability, dependency, diversification, decentralization, et al.	Asia-Pacific region
Yingzhu Li. [9]	vulnerability, efficiency, and sustainability	Singapore, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan.
Sovacool et al. [10]	availability, affordability, technology, sustainability, regulation	United States, Australia and so on
Seolhee Cho et al. [11]	the total required cost, the dependence on imported energy, CO2 emissions, and land use	Korea
Joana Portugal et al. [12]	availability, reliability, global environmental sustainability, et al.	Japan.
Vivoda V et al. [13]	11 dimensions such as energy supply, demand management, et al.	Asia-Pacific region.
Sáfián et al. [14]	sustainability, energy security and affordability	Hungary.
Geng et al. [15]	energy external availability, energy technologies and energy efficiency, energy resource reserves, et al.	China.
Tonn B et al. [16]	energy independence, energy security, greenhouse gas reduction	United States.
Laldjebaev M et al. [17]	availability, accessibility, sustainability and other dimensions	Tajikistan

The above table shows that the concept of energy security has changed from “one-dimensional dominance” to “multi-dimensional drive”, and its dimensions are mainly focused on energy availability, infrastructure, energy prices, social impact, economic development, technological development, environment, governance, and energy efficiency, research areas are mainly concentrated in areas with high energy consumption, such as China, the United States. and the European Union.

Regarding the evaluation method of energy security, there are about ten comprehensive indexes that are currently widely used [18], respectively, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, Shannon-Wiener Index, Supply/Demand Index for Long-term Security of Supply, Oil Vulnerability Index [19], Risky External Energy Supply, Socioeconomic Energy Risk [20], The US Energy Security Risk Index, MOSES (Measuring Short-term Energy Security), Energy Security Index [21], Global Energy Architecture Performance Index, most of them are concerned about energy supply.

To sum up, the concept of energy security is multi-dimensional, and the above dimensions are interrelated and are not completely independent, but are basically included in the four dimensions adopted in this paper: Energy supply stability, use security, technical reliability, and social and environmental sustainability. Due to the extensiveness and strong representation of G20 members, the energy security situation can reflect the world energy security pattern to a certain extent. Therefore, this paper chooses G20 countries as the research object.

3. Construction of Index System

The framework covers four dimensions and 14 indicators, as shown in Figure 1. Supply stability includes energy reserves and energy production structure, and use security includes energy consumption structure and sustainable access to energy and payment capacity. In addition, technological and environmental impacts should be considered. Based on the frequency of use of each index and the universality of indicators among countries, 14 indicators in this paper were selected. While the frequency of line loss rate and per capita installed capacity is not as high as other indicators, the author believes that it is an important technical indicator to measure national energy security, so it is also included in the index system. The specific attributes and meanings of each indicator are shown in Table 2.

Figure 1. Early-warning status assessment system of energy security.

Table 2. The description of safety evaluation index.

Index	Introduction	Index Attribute
Self-sufficiency rate	The index refers to the percentage of a country’s energy consumption that is provided by its own production.	positive index
Reserve-production ratio	The index refers to the ratio of remaining recoverable reserves to annual production.	positive index
The index of diversification of production	The higher the diversity index of energy production in a country, the richer the variety of energy production, the weaker the influence of various energy resources on the total energy supply, and the diversity of energy production contributes to the improvement of the stability of energy supply/demand.	positive index
The proportion of fossil fuels in energy consumption	This index refers to the proportion of fossil energy in primary energy consumption. The larger the proportion, the less safe it is.	negative index
The proportion of renewable energy generation	The index reflects the share of renewable energy in an area.	positive index
Per capita installed capacity	Installed capacity generally refers to the rated capacity of the generator installed in a power station.	positive index
External dependence	$ED={\displaystyle {\sum }_i(P_i)}\ln P_i$, where Pi is the share of energy i imports from country P in total energy imports. The bigger the index, the greater the concentration of energy imports, and the greater the impact on the overall energy security once the supply of energy suppliers is interrupted due to political, economic and other reasons.	negative index
Energy intensity	The index refers to the ratio of energy use to economic or material output. At the national level, energy intensity is the ratio of total domestic primary energy use or final energy use to GDP.	moderate index
The index of diversification of consumption	The higher the diversity index of energy consumption in a country, the richer the types of energy consumption, the weaker the influence of various energy resources on the total energy demand, and the diversity of energy consumption contributes to the improvement of the stability of energy demand.	positive index
Availability of energy on the international market	The index examines whether the domestic energy supply and demand gap can be met at a reasonable price through the international market.	positive index
Electrified rate	This index can reflect the electrification level of an area to a certain extent.	positive index
The rate of line loss	This index refers to the percentage of power consumed in the power network and supplied to the power network, and is used to evaluate the economy of power system operation.	negative index
Carbon intensity	The index refers to the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per unit of GDP, and the level of carbon intensity does not indicate the level of efficiency. Generally, the index declines with technological progress and economic growth.	negative index
The index of PM2.5	PM2.5 refers to particulate matter smaller than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter in the atmosphere, which is also known as luggable particulate matter. The higher the index value is, the more serious the pollution is. The negative impact of energy utilization is relatively large, which is unfavorable to the sustainable development of energy.	negative index

4. Evaluation Process of Energy Security

This paper aims to construct a universal multidimensional evaluation system. The energy security index is aggregated from bottom-up calculations using “scores” (objective values) and “weights” (principal component analysis) to obtain a country’s overall ESI. After obtaining ESI of 19 countries, this paper analyzes the evolutionary mechanisms of countries and gives the swot matrix. Finally, taking China as an example for scenario analysis, it shows the changes in energy security and the contribution of key indicators.

4.1. Implementation Path of Evaluation Model

The overall research route of this paper is shown in Figure 2, which shows the research content and method of this paper.

Figure 2. Implementation path of evaluation model.

4.2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

PCA is a statistical tool used to reduce dimensions of multivariate dataset. It retains maximum informative value of the input data intact, while trying to reduce its dimensions. PCA summarizes the information that is dispersed in several dimensions into a decreased number of dimensions that are not correlated. It is a widely acceptable appropriate procedure for independent variable selection and by discarding redundant or highly correlated parameters. It identifies the variance within a huge dataset of correlated variables in terms of a small number of new pseudo variables called Principal Components. As the principal components are uncorrelated in nature, it indicates that they are representing the information of a different “statistical dimensions” in the dataset. The specific application steps are as follows:

• Calculate the mean vector of the samples in the sample data set and centralize the sample data, $\tilde{X}=X-\mu$.
• Construct the covariance matrix $\tilde{X}$ of the data matrix V, the eigenvalue λ_i and the corresponding eigenvector w_i are obtained by eigendecomposition of the matrix V, and the eigenvalue λ_i is arranged in descending order.
• According to the contribution rate, the first d eigenvalues $\mathsf{\Lambda }=diag[{\lambda }_1,{\lambda }_2,\dots ,{\lambda }_d]$ and corresponding eigenvectors $w_d=[w_1,w_2,\dots ,w_d]$ are taken as the basis of the subspace. Then, the d principal components to be extracted are $F=W_d{}^t\tilde{X}$.
• The original data is reconstructed from the extracted principal components $X=WF+\mu$.

5. Case Study

5.1. Results and Discussions

According to regional classification, the ESI of G20 countries from 1992 to 2015 are shown in Figure 3. On the whole, the ESI of most G20 countries was on the rise from 1992 to 2015. However, due to the differences in national conditions, the trend and magnitude of energy security changes are also different. Among them, the ESI in Asia and Europe fluctuates the most, while in America, South Africa, and Oceania, the energy security situation is relatively stable and the ESI increases slightly.

Figure 3. (a) Evolution of the ESI of G20 countries in Asia from 1992 to 2015; (b) evolution of the ESI of G20 countries in Europe from 1992 to 2015; (c) evolution of the ESI of G20 countries in America from 1992 to 2015; and (d) evolution of the ESI of G20 countries in other countries from 1992 to 2015.

5.1.1. Spatial-Temporal Analysis and SWOT Matrix Analysis of Energy Security Evolution in G20 Countries

According to the historical score of each country, the score is divided into four ranges from low to high, as shown in Table 3, respectively high-risk type, low-risk type, slightly-safe type, and safe type.

Table 3. The classification of the ESI of G20 Countries.

ESI	1995	2000	2005	2010	2015
High-risk type (3–4)	China; Saudi Arabia; South Africa	China; Saudi Arabia; South Africa	Saudi Arabia; South Africa	Saudi Arabia; South Africa	Saudi Arabia
Low-risk type (4–5)	India; South Korea	India; South Korea	China; India	China; India	India; South Africa
Slightly-safe type (5–6)	Argentina; Australia; Germany; The UK; Indonesia; Italy; Japan; Mexico; Russia; Turkey	Argentina; Australia; The UK; Indonesia; Italy; Japan; Mexico; Russia; Turkey	Argentina; Australia; French; Indonesia; Italy; Japan; Mexico; Russia; Turkey; South Korea	Argentina; Australia; Indonesia; Japan; Mexico; Russia; Turkey; South Korea	Argentina; Australia; Indonesia; Japan; Mexico; Russia; Turkey; South Korea; China
Safe type (6–8)	Brazil; Canada; French; The United States	Germany; Brazil; Canada; French; The United States	Germany; Brazil; Canada; The UK; The United States	Germany; Brazil; Canada; The UK; The United States; French; Italy	Brazil; Canada; The UK; The United States; French; Italy

As can be seen from the Table 3, the safe countries are mainly distributed in developed regions such as Europe and America. High-risk type and low-risk type countries are mainly located in Africa and Asia. Among the G20 countries, most are slightly-safe type countries. It is worth noting that China has risen from a high-risk country in 1995 to a slightly-safe country in 2015, and the energy security situation continues to improve.

According to the variation trend of evaluation indicators in the past three years and the degree of similarity between them, this paper adopts k-means method for cluster analysis of 19 countries. According to the results, it can be divided into five categories. The first category is mainly developed countries, including Australia, Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Japan, Korea and the United States. The second category of countries have a single energy structure, including Saudi Arabia and South Africa. The third category is Brazil, the only developing country that is a safe-type country. The fourth category is Canada, which consistently leads other countries in energy security. The fifth category is mainly developing countries, including Argentina, China, Indonesia, India, Mexico, Russia, and Turkey. This paper takes the first, second and fifth categories as examples, and then use SWOT matrix to analyzes the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of these countries, and gives relevant countermeasures, as shown in the Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6.

Table 4. SWOT matrix analysis of countries in the first category.

	Strengths	Weaknesses
SWOT	S1: Developed economy and strong affordability. S2: Complete supply chain and supporting service facilities. S3: Advanced technology and high energy efficiency. S4: The market is highly liquid and energy sources are available.	W1: High energy demand, insufficient resource reserve and high external dependence. W2: Serious pollution and large carbon dioxide emission in the process of energy use. W3: High cost of energy import.
Opportunities	SO strategy: use advantages to seize opportunities	WO strategy: use opportunities to overcome disadvantages
O1: International policies are gradually keeping looser, trade between countries is frequent, and access to energy are diversified. O2: National policies support low-carbon development and promote the use of clean energy sources	1. Make use of the country’s economic advantages and sound infrastructure to further develop clean energy. 2. Make use of the key technologies in the energy development process to build the brand and form the core advantages.	1. Improve technology to reduce pollution emissions. 2. Optimize energy mix and seek energy alternatives.
Threats	ST strategy: use advantage to avoid threats	WT strategy: minimize weaknesses and threats
T1: With the reduction of energy reserves, global energy consumption has increased. T2: Energy prices continue to rise. T3: Major energy source countries are political instability.	1. Seek new sources of energy with relatively political stability and strengthen international cooperation. 2. Establish an energy reserve system.	1. Develop clean energy industry structure with core competitiveness. 2. Establish alliance system to jointly address energy tensions.

Table 5. SWOT matrix analysis of countries in the second category.

	Strengths	Weaknesses
SWOT	S1: High energy self-sufficiency. S2: Rich in resources, with the advantages of energy exports.	W1: The energy structure is single. W2: Regional politics is not stable enough. W3: Technical level needs to be further improved, low energy efficiency. W4: Low proportion of clean energy in the consumption.
Opportunities	SO strategy: use advantages to seize opportunities	WO strategy: use opportunities to overcome disadvantages
O1: International demand for energy imports is growing and energy prices are rising. O2: International cooperation has become more frequent, with various forms of cooperation and more extensive exchanges.	1. Increase investment in upstream industries and improve the industrial structure. 2. Focus on developing the refining and chemical industries	1. Use energy export industries to drive economic development in other areas and diversify the economic structure. 2. Strengthen infrastructure construction
Threats	ST strategy: use advantage to avoid threats	WT strategy: minimize weaknesses and threats
T1: Affected by external energy prices due to the single structure. T2: Energy supply status changes from “monopoly supplier” to “marginal supplier”. T3: Single object of international cooperation.	1. Seek new partners, expand market share in the Asia-pacific region, and balance preferential pricing policies. 2. Encourage equal participation by all people in energy development and increase employment opportunities.	1. Develop solar energy, nuclear energy and other clean energy sources. 2. Increase the proportion of natural gas in primary energy consumption. 3. Increase the installed capacity of clean energy.

Table 6. SWOT matrix analysis of countries in the fifth category.

	Strengths	Weaknesses
SWOT	S1: With a small energy gap and have some resource advantages. S2: Relatively stable regional politics. S3: Better infrastructure.	W1: Low energy efficiency and technical level to be improved. W2: Large pollution discharge. W3: The energy structure is not perfect, mainly dominated by fossil energy consumption. W4: Large energy consumption with imbalance of economic structure.
Opportunities	SO strategy: use advantages to seize opportunities	WO strategy: use opportunities to overcome disadvantages
O1: The international oil price has a downward trend. O2: New energy technologies are developing rapidly. O3: Close international cooperation.	1. Improve infrastructure construction and reduce energy transportation costs. 2. Optimize the upstream industrial policy, develop and utilize domestic abundant resources, and improve the export trade of energy.	1. Improve the construction of new energy and optimize the energy structure. 2. Use international cooperation to bring new markets and absorb foreign capital and advanced technologies.
Threats	ST strategy: use advantage to avoid threats	WT strategy: minimize weaknesses and threats
T1: Have a low voice on energy prices in the international market. T2: National energy policy constraints.	1. Strengthen international cooperation. 2. Gradually liberalize policies and utilize international cooperation to develop and utilize domestic resources.	1. Electric power trade has the potential to develop, improve infrastructure construction and increase installed capacity. 2. Actively develop other unconventional energy sources.

5.1.2. Driving Factor Analysis

The influence of each indicator on the energy security of G20 countries in the past 24 years is analyzed through the change trend of historical data and the weight of each indicator. Figure 4 shows the contribution of the four dimensions of the 2015 index system to the energy security of each country. It can be seen from the figure that supply stability is still the mainstream driving factor, generally around 30%. Supply stability and social and environmental sustainability account for 60–70%, which are the main driving factors affecting energy security. Different countries have slightly different performance in these four dimensions. For example, Canada, Brazil, China, Russia, and India are typical supply-driven countries. The United States, Australia, Italy, France, and other developed countries are driven by social and environmental sustainability, and energy security mainly depends on the technological maturity and energy efficiency.

Figure 4. The contribution of each dimension index to the safety in 2015.

5.2. Scenario Analysis of China’s ESI

5.2.1. The Key Indicators of China’s ESI

Taking China as an example, this paper demonstrates the key impact indicators of its energy security intensity and calculates the contribution rate of each index to China’s ESI growth, as shown in Figure 5 below. As can be seen from the above research, China’s ESI increased from 3.69 in 1992 to 5.15 in 2015. In the past 24 years, China’s ESI increased by 39.58 percent, far exceeding the growth rate of other G20 countries. It can be seen from Figure 5 that the biggest contribution to China’s ESI growth is carbon intensity, energy intensity, consumption diversity, and per capita installed capacity. The contribution rate to China’s ESI exceeded 10%, and the cumulative contribution reached 97.92%. In addition, the contribution rate of fossil energy consumption to China’s ESI growth rate reached −10.8%, which has become the biggest bottleneck that hinders China’s energy security development.

Figure 5. The contribution of various indicators to China’s ESI growth.

5.2.2. Scenario Analysis Based on Key Indicators

According to the growth trend of various indicators from 2010 to 2015 (as shown in Figure 6), this paper sets three scenarios for the development trend of each indicator in 2020, which are optimistic, neutral and pessimistic. The growth rates and energy security contributions of each indicator under different scenarios are shown in Table 7 and Table 8.

Figure 6. Growth rate of key indicators of China’s energy security in 2015 (based on 2010).

Table 7. Growth rate of key indicators in 2020 (based on 2015) in three scenarios (unit/%).

Scenario Set	Production Diversity Index	Carbon Intensity	Energy Intensity	The Proportion of Fossil Fuels	The Proportion of Renewable Energy	Per Capita Installed Capacity	Consumption Diversity Index
Optimism	10	18	20	10	25	50	60
Neutral	8	14	15	8	20	40	45
Pessimistic	5	10	10	5	15	30	30

Table 8. Energy security contribution of each index and ESI in 2020.

Scenario	Production Diversity Index	Carbon Intensity	Energy Intensity	The Proportion of Fossil Fuels	The Proportion of Renewable Energy	Per Capita Installed Capacity	Consumption Diversity Index	Cumulative Contribution Rate (%)	ESI
Optimism	0.049	0.093	0.073	0.018	0.065	0.113	0.319	0.730	5.884
Neutral	0.0040	0.072	0.055	0.014	0.052	0.090	0.240	0.563	5.717
Pessimistic	0.025	0.052	0.037	0.009	0.039	0.068	0.160	0.390	5.544

It can be seen that the contribution rate of energy consumption diversity index to the growth in 2020 will reach 31.9%, 24% and 16% respectively in three scenarios, which will become the most important driving factor for the improvement of energy security in China from 2016 to 2020. Carbon intensity, energy intensity, the proportion of renewable energy power generation capacity and the per capita installed capacity also contribute significantly to the improvement. Production diversity index and the ratio of fossil energy consumption to energy security have little impact, which is caused by the low growth rate of these two indicators. However, China’s current national conditions also make it difficult for these two indicators to achieve breakthrough development in 2016–2020.

5.2.3. Proposals for China to Improve Energy Security

Based on the historical data of key indicators and comparative analysis among G20 countries, the following suggestions are put forward for China’s future energy security development strategies:

(1) Increase the proportion of natural gas in fossil energy consumption. This is an important indicator affecting China’s energy security. Since the increase in the share of natural gas in fossil energy consumption will directly promote the diversification of China’s energy consumption and effectively increase China’s carbon intensity level, this improvement will significantly improve China’s energy security level in the future; and (2) continue to expand the installed power generation capacity in China, especially to increase the proportion of renewable energy in the newly added power generation capacity. This will directly promote China’s per capita installed capacity and the proportion of renewable energy generation, which is also an important indicators affecting China’s energy security level. In addition, the increase in the proportion of renewable energy generation will simultaneously promote the diversification of China’s energy consumption and the increase of carbon intensity in the future, thereby improving the energy security level of China in the future; (3) look to the international energy market and take advantage of the “One Belt And One Road” strategic opportunity. China urgently needs to participate in international cooperation on energy supply security, establish friendly dialogue mechanisms with the world’s energy exporters and world powers, and diversify its energy supply. China needs to accelerate the exploration and development of overseas energy and resources to raise China’s position in the global energy industry value chain.

6. Conclusions

Based on the data of energy supply stability, use safety, technical reliability, and environmental sustainability of 19 G20 countries from 1992 to 2015, this paper calculates the ESI of 19 countries. The evolution characteristics, formation mechanism and policy recommendations of energy security pattern of G20 countries are systematically analyzed. At the same time, the change of China’s ESI and the contribution rate of key indexes to it under three scenarios are analyzed. The results show that:

(1)

On the whole, the energy security index of G20 countries shows an increasing trend, and the number of dangerous countries is decreasing, among which, China has increased from dangerous countries to generally safe countries.

(2)

From the geographical location of G20 countries, the security countries are mainly concentrated in the Americas and European developed countries, and the dangerous countries are mainly concentrated in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Environmental sustainability and use safety dimensions are the main factors affecting dangerous countries. Improving energy efficiency and technical reliability and increasing clean energy installation are the keys to the trend change of energy security pattern in these countries.

(3)

From the point of view of driving mechanism, seven indicators, such as production diversity index, carbon intensity, energy intensity, fossil energy consumption ratio, renewable energy generation installation ratio, per capita installation and consumption diversity index, are the key impact indicators.

(4)

As far as China is concerned, the energy security index has continued to rise since 1995. At present, China is a generally safe country, which reflects the continuous optimization of the energy structure and the improvement of the energy situation in China. Constantly improve the relationship between energy system and economic, demographic, and environmental systems.

Energy security is a core field in the study of sustainable development of society, economy and ecological environment in the world at present. The members of the Group of 20 (G-20) are broad and representative. The Group’s GDP accounts for 90% of the global economy and 80% of the world’s trade. Therefore, the energy security situation of G20 countries represents the pattern of energy security in the world to a certain extent. In the face of the changes in the pattern of world energy security, we should recognize the status of national energy security and judge the possible changes in the international energy pattern. It has become an important basis and reference for countries to plan energy strategy, diplomatic strategy, development strategy, and security strategy with forward-looking strategic thinking.