Next Article in Journal
Willingness-to-Pay for District Heating from Renewables of Private Households in Germany
Previous Article in Journal
Youth Mobilization to Stop Global Climate Change: Narratives and Impact
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dynamic Coordination of Internal Displacement: Return and Integration Cases in Ukraine and Georgia

by
Oleg Bazaluk
1,* and
Svitlana Balinchenko
2
1
Belt and Road Initiative Centre for Chinese-European Studies, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, China
2
Philosophy Department, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi 58012, Ukraine
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(10), 4123; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104123
Submission received: 18 March 2020 / Revised: 5 May 2020 / Accepted: 15 May 2020 / Published: 18 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainability in Geographic Science)

Abstract

The conflict-related internal displacement in Ukraine since 2014, after the armed combats with Russian military forces backing the separatist administrations, as well as the occupation of Crimea by the Russian Federation have not been state-organized. They imply a range of personal choices depending on civil positions and destinations for resettlement; therefore, the affected persons get involved in the consequent practical discourses and decision-making processes. Based on the legislative acts and the international reports on internal displacement, the internal displacement due to the current hybrid war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine is compared with the first Russia-backed separatist conflicts after the collapse of the USSR—the wars in South Ossetia, in 1992, and in Abkhazia, in 2008. The internal displacement situations have been reviewed through their dynamic coordination patterns, with regard to non-equilibrium transitions, fluctuations, and adaptations triggered on the systemic, community, and personal levels, as well as to the expected durable solutions: integration, return, temporary resettlement. Therefore, we suggest, for further discussion, the patterns of bistability—for the internal displacement due to the Russo-Georgian wars of 1992 and 2008, characterized by an overfocus, in the practical discourses, on the return of the internally displaced persons (IDP), and metastability—for the conflict-related internal displacement in Ukraine, with both the return and local integration solutions creating the quasi-stable system.
Keywords: Ukraine; Georgia; internal displacement; bistability; metastability Ukraine; Georgia; internal displacement; bistability; metastability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bazaluk, O.; Balinchenko, S. Dynamic Coordination of Internal Displacement: Return and Integration Cases in Ukraine and Georgia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104123

AMA Style

Bazaluk O, Balinchenko S. Dynamic Coordination of Internal Displacement: Return and Integration Cases in Ukraine and Georgia. Sustainability. 2020; 12(10):4123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bazaluk, Oleg, and Svitlana Balinchenko. 2020. "Dynamic Coordination of Internal Displacement: Return and Integration Cases in Ukraine and Georgia" Sustainability 12, no. 10: 4123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104123

APA Style

Bazaluk, O., & Balinchenko, S. (2020). Dynamic Coordination of Internal Displacement: Return and Integration Cases in Ukraine and Georgia. Sustainability, 12(10), 4123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop