Sustainability of China’s Singles Day Shopping Festivals: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Fairness Atmospherics on Consumers’ Continuance Participation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Theoretical Background
2.1. Shopping Festival vs. Festival Shopping
2.2. Expectation-Confirmation Theory (ECT) and Consumers’ Continuance Behaviors
2.3. The Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) Framework
2.4. Promotion Campaign as Stimuli (S)
2.5. Emotional Satisfactions as Organism (O)
2.6. Continuance Participation Intention as Response (R)
3. Research Model and Hypotheses Development
3.1. Relationship between Promotion Scale (S) and Satisfaction (O)
3.2. Relationship between Social Interaction (S) and Satisfaction (O)
3.3. Relationship between Satisfaction (O) and the Continuance Behavior (R)
3.4. The Moderating Role of Fairness Atmospherics
4. Measurement Development and Data Collection
4.1. Measurement Development
4.2. Data Collection
5. Data Analysis and Results
5.1. Measurement Model Validation
5.2. Structural Model with Results
5.3. The Moderating Effect of Fairness Atmospherics
5.3.1. The Hierarchical Regression Analyses
5.3.2. External Stimuli and Emotional Satisfaction-as-Trust
5.3.3. External Stimuli and Emotional Satisfaction-as-Pleasure
5.3.4. Emotional Satisfaction and Continuance Participation Intention
6. Conclusions and Discussion
- 1.
- This study revealed that large promotion scale and good social interaction during the SDSF are two kinds of external stimuli to trigger participants’ satisfaction-as-trust, that is, the overall satisfaction judgment on trusting the ability and competence of Alibaba to fulfill their expectation of having more chances and choices to buy what they want with lower prices than ordinary.
- 2.
- On the other hand, this study also revealed that these two kinds of external stimuli lead to participants’ satisfaction-as-pleasure, that is, the overall satisfaction judgment on realizing their expectation of having a higher opportunity to have pleasure during the SDSF.
- 3.
- All of these two kinds of satisfactions can be used to predict the continuance participation intention and behaviors, subsequently, explain the reason for continuous increments of both participation population and sales volume of SDSFs.
- 4.
- In addition, this study examined the moderating effect of fairness atmospherics. The findings of this study identified that the high perception group of fairness atmospherics will have more emotional satisfactions and continuance participant intention than the low perception group. However, the negative sign of the moderating effect indicates that the satisfaction and intention difference between high and low perception group will decrease as the decrease of external stimuli. Therefore, the participation mood created by the fairness atmospherics ultimately moderates the relationships between external stimuli and participants’ internal satisfactions, and the relationships between satisfaction and their continuance intention.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brennan, T.; Chou, C.; Li, C. Alibaba’s Newest 11.11 GMV Record: US$38.4B. 2019. Available online: https://www.alizila.com/alibabas-newest-11-11-gmv-record-us38-4b/ (accessed on 25 March 2020).
- Wu, J.H.; Li, Q.; Wei, K.K. Alibaba’s IT platform and electronic commerce synergy in driving “Singles’ Day”. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 2016, 26, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Zitikis, R. Should we opt for the Black Friday discounted price or wait until the boxing day? Math. Sci. 2017, 42, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, J.B.; Peters, C. An exploratory investigation of Black Friday consumption rituals. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2011, 39, 522–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lennon, S.J.; Johnson, K.K.P.; Lee, J. A perfect storm for consumer misbehavior: Shopping on Black Friday. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2011, 29, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.M. How does shopping with others influence impulsive purchasing? J. Consum. Psychol. 2005, 15, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.V.; Su, B.C.; Widjaja, A.E. Facebook C2C social commerce: A study online impulse buying. Decis. Support Syst. 2016, 83, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dospinescu, O.; Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N. Key factors determining the expected benefit of customers when using bank cards: An analysis on millennials and generation Z in Romania. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Klimas, C.A.; Shaffer, B. Exploring the impact of holiday gifts: An economic and environmental comparison of DVDs and books received as gifts. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 19, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayaratne, M.; Mort, G.S.; D’Soua, C. Sustainability entrepreneurship: From consumer concern towards entrepreneurial commitment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Craig, T.; Polhill, G.; Colley, K.; Carrus, G.; Maricchiolo, F.; Bonaiuto, M.; Bonnes, M.; Dumitru, A.; Mira, G. Transmission of pro-environmental norms in large organization. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 19, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.Y.; Li, Q.; Peng, L.F.; Hsia, T.L.; Huang, C.J.; Wu, J.H. The impact of informational incentives and social influence on consumer behavior during Alibaba’s online shopping carnival. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 76, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kastanakis, M.N.; Balabanis, G. Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1399–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolter, P. Atmospherics as a marketing tool. J. Retail. 1973, 49, 48–64. [Google Scholar]
- Ray, R.K. Asian capital in the age of European domination: The rise of the bazaar, 1800–1914. Mod. Asian Stud. 1995, 29, 449–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMillan, J. Reinventing the Bazaar: A Natural History of Markets; W. W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, E.; Arnold, S.J. More than a labor of love: Gender roles and Christmas gift shopping. J. Consum. Res. 1990, 17, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laroche, M.; Saad, G.; Kim, C.; Browne, E. A cross-cultural study of in-store information search strategies for a Christmas gift. J. Bus. Res. 2000, 49, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeung, W.Y.M.; Yee, S.W.M. Chinese New Year Festival: Exploring consumer purchase intention at the flower market in Macau. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 29, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belk, W.R.; Bryce, W. Christmas shopping scenes: From modern miracle to postmodern mall. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1993, 10, 277–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machleit, K.A.; Eroglu, S.A.; Mantel, S.P. Perceived retail crowding and shopping satisfaction: What modifies this relationship? J. Consum. Psychol. 2000, 9, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zehrer, A.; Raich, F. The impact of perceived crowding on customer satisfaction. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2016, 29, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 1980, 17, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. J. Consum. Res. 1993, 20, 418–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westbrook, R.A.; Oliver, R.L. The dimensionality of consumption emotion patterns and consumer satisfaction. J. Consum. Res. 1991, 18, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fournier, S.; Mick, D.G. Rediscovering satisfaction. J. Mark. 1999, 63, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, C.; Yu, Y.T. Satisfaction emotions and consumer behavioral intentions. J. Serv. Mark. 2005, 19, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, D.; Martin, N.; Hubbard, S.; Palmer, A. The role of emotion in explaining consumer satisfaction and future behavioural intention. J. Serv. Mark. 2008, 22, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.T.; Dean, A. The contribution of emotional satisfaction to consumer loyalty. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 2001, 12, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Bitner, M.J. Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. J. Mark. 1992, 56, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P. Principles of Marketing Management; Science Research Associates Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Lammers, H.B.; Leibowitz, L.; Seymour, G.E.; Hennessey, J.E. Humor and cognitive responses to advertising stimuli: A trace consolidation approach. J. Bus. Res. 1983, 11, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, K.N.; Khalifa, M. System design effects on online impulse buying. Internet Res. 2012, 22, 396–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, W.G.; Moon, Y.J. Customers’ cognitive, emotional, and actionable response to the servicescape: A test of the moderating effect of the restaurant type. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2009, 28, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.M.; Kim, M.J. The effects of home page design on consumer responses: Moderating role of centrality of visual product aesthetics. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 38, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, L.; Monroe, K.B. It’s not all about money: The role of identity in perceived fairness of targeted promotions. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2017, 26, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yuen, K.F.; Wong, Y.D.; Teo, C.C. It is green, but is it fair? Investigating consumers’ fairness perception of green service offerings. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borden, N.H. The concept of the marketing mix. J. Advert. Res. 1984, 24, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
- Kotler, P. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Y.; Huang, J.S. Effects of price discounts and bonus packs on online impulse buying. Soc. Behav. Personal. 2014, 42, 1293–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grover, R.; Srinivasan, V. Evaluating the multiple effects of retail promotions on brand loyal and brand switching segments. J. Mark. Res. 1992, 29, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucklin, R.E.; Siddarth, S.; Silva-Risso, J.M. Distribution intensity and new car choice. J. Mark. Res. 2008, 45, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Florence, P.V.; Guizani, H.; Merunka, D. The impact of brand personality and sales promotions on brand equity. J. Bus. Res. 2011, 64, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dospinescu, N. The public relations events in promoting brand identity of the city. Econ. Appl. Inform. 2014, 1, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
- Sajtos, L.; Kreis, H.; Brodie, R. Image, brand relationships and customer value: Exploring the moderating role of advertising spending- and labour-intensity in customer loyalty. J. Serv. Theory Pract. 2015, 25, 51–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godes, D.; Mayzlin, D.; Das, S. The firm’s management of social interactions. Mark. Lett. 2005, 16, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu-Priour, D.L.; Truong, Y.; Klink, R.R. The effects of collectivism and polychronic time orientation on online social interaction and shopping behavior: A comparative study between China and France. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 88, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N. Electronic word-of-mouth for online retailers: Predictors of volume and valence. Sustainability 2019, 11, 814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anderson, E.; Fornell, C.; Lehmann, D. Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. J. Mark. 1994, 58, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, Y.S.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, C.K. Measuring festival quality and value affecting visitors’ satisfaction and loyalty, using a structural approach. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 29, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanford, S.; Jung, S.Y. Festival attributes and perceptions: A meta-analysis of relationships with satisfaction and loyalty. Tour. Manag. 2017, 61, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M.A.; Suh, J. Transaction-specific satisfaction and overall satisfaction: An empirical analysis. J. Serv. Mark. 2000, 14, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, L.; Kukar-Kinney, M.; Monroe, K.B. Effects of consumers’ efforts on price and promotion fairness perceptions. J. Retail. 2010, 86, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swan, J.E.; Bowers, M.R.; Richardson, L.D. Customer trust in the salesperson: An integrative review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature. J. Bus. Res. 1999, 44, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirdeshmuku, D.; Singh, J.; Sabol, B. Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J. Mark. 2002, 66, 15–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flavián, C.; Guinalíu, M. Consumer trust, perceived security and privacy policy: Three basic elements of loyalty to a web site. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2006, 106, 601–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loureiro, S.M.C.; González, F.J.M. The importance of quality, satisfaction, trust, and image in relation to rural tourist loyalty. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2008, 25, 117–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loureiro, S.M.C.; Miranda, F.J.; Breazeale, M. Who needs delight? The greater impact of value, trust and satisfaction in utilitarian, frequent-use retail. J. Serv. Manag. 2014, 25, 101–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirschman, E.C.; Holbrook, M.B. Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. J. Mark. 1986, 48, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alba, J.W.; Williams, E.F. Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption. J. Consum. Psychol. 2013, 23, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babin, B.J.; Darden, W.R.; Griffin, M. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consum. Res. 1994, 20, 644–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Childers, T.L.; Carr, C.L.; Peck, J.; Carson, S. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 511–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M.A.; Reynolds, K.E.; Arnold, M.J. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. J. Bus. Res. 2006, 59, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hellier, P.K.; Geursen, G.M.; Carr, R.A.; Rickard, J.A. Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. Eur. J. Mark. 2003, 37, 1762–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hsiao, C.H.; Chang, J.J.; Tang, K.Y. Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social Apps: Satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telemat. Inf. 2016, 33, 342–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choo, H.; Ahn, K.; Petrick, J.F. An integrated model of festival revisit intentions. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 28, 818–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manning, K.C.; Sprott, D.E. Multiple unit price promotions and their effects on quantity purchase intentions. J. Retail. 2007, 84, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.S.; Ng, I.C.L. Advanced sale of service capacities: A theoretical analysis of the impact of price sensitivity on pricing and capacity allocations. J. Bus. Res. 2001, 54, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cao, Y.; Gruca, T.S.; Klemz, B.R. Internet pricing, price satisfaction and consumer satisfaction. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2003, 8, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swilley, E.; Goldsmith, R.E. Black Friday and Cyber Monday: Understanding consumer intentions on two major shopping days. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2013, 20, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Tractinsky, N.; Vitale, M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2000, 1, 45–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, B.; Donthu, N.; Lee, S. An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2000, 28, 195–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renard, D. Online promotional games: Impact of flow experience on word-of-mouth and personal information sharing. Int. Bus. Res. 2013, 6, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, C.X.J.; Davison, R.M. Why eBay lost to TaoBao in China: The global advantage. Commun. ACM 2009, 52, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.J.; Beatty, S.E.; Foxx, W. Signaling the trustworthiness of small online retailers. J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 18, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, D.; Menon, S.; Sivakumar, K. Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. J. Interact. Mark. 2005, 19, 15–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Park, H. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, D.H. User experience in social commerce: In friends we trust. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2013, 32, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, B.Z.; Fan, W.G.; Zhou, M. Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 56, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, M.J.; Reynolds, K.E. Hedonic shopping motivations. J. Retail. 2003, 79, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherman, E.; Mathur, A.; Smith, R.B. Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: Mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychol. Mark. 1997, 14, 361–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.H.; Jang, S.C.S. The effects of dining atmospherics: An extended Mehrabian-Russell model. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2009, 28, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Ryu, K. The roles of the physical environment, price perception, and customer satisfaction in determining customer loyalty in the restaurant industry. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2009, 33, 487–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garaus, M. Atmospheric harmony in the retail environment: Its influence on store satisfaction and re-patronage intention. J. Consum. Behav. 2017, 16, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koo, D.M.; Ju, S.H. The interactional effects of atmospherics and perceptual curiosity on emotions and online shopping intention. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.J.; Minor, M.S.; Wei, J. Aesthetics and the online shopping environment: Understanding consumer responses. J. Retail. 2011, 87, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Necula, S.C.; Păvăloaia, V.D.; Strîmbei, C.; Dospinescu, O. Enhancement of e-commerce websites with semantic web technologies. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dospinescu, O.; Percă-Robu, A.E. The analysis of e-commerce sites with eye-tracking technologies. BRAIN Broad Res. Artif. Intell. Neurosci. 2017, 8, 85–100. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, C.S.; Galliers, R.D.; Shin, N.; Ryoo, J.H.; Kim, J.H. Factors influencing Internet shopping value and customer repurchase intention. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2012, 11, 374–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Y.L.; Qureshi, I.; Sun, H.S.; McCole, P.; Ramsey, E.; Lim, K.H. Trust, satisfaction, and online repurchase intention: The moderating role of perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms. MIS Q. 2014, 38, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hair, J.F.J.R.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- López-Bonilla, L.M.; López-Bonilla, J.M. Explaining the discrepancy in the mediating role of attitude in the TAM. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2017, 48, 940–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunnally, J.C.; Bernstein, I.H. Psychometric Theory; McGraw-Hill Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Gefen, D.; Straub, D. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2005, 16, 91–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cohen, J.; Cohen, P.; West, S.G.; Aiken, L.S. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- López-Bonilla, J.M.; López-Bonilla, L.M.; Sanz-Altamira, B. Designated public festivals of interest to tourists. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2010, 18, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, J.; Jang, S.C. Effects of service quality and food quality: The moderating role of atmospherics in an ethnic restaurant segment. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 29, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Constructs | Items | Sources | |
---|---|---|---|
Promotion Scale (PS) | PS1 | More deeper discounts are offered in SDSF, as compared to other kinds of promotions. | Adapted/modified from Yoo et al. [73]; |
PS2 | The number of brands and items that offer discounts in SDSF is more than that of other kinds of promotions. | Florence et al. [44]. | |
PS3 | Discounts are offered in as varieties of manners as possible in SDSF. | ||
Social Interaction (SI) | SI1 | Sharing discounts information with others in SDSF is a bonding experience. | Adapted/modified from Arnold and Reynolds [81]; |
SI2 | I enjoy socializing with others when I find a good deal in SDSF. | Xu-Priour et al. [48]. | |
SI3 | I communicate with my friends or family on experience in SDSF to socialize. | ||
Satisfaction-as- Trust (ST) | ST1 | I am satisfied that there are indeed my favorite items with discount prices as SDSF has promised. | Adapted/modified from Flavián and Guinalíu [57]; |
ST2 | I am satisfied that I surely save money as SDSF has committed. | Loureiro and González [58]; Loureiro et al. [59]. | |
ST3 | I am satisfied that there are so many good deals and opportunities as SDSF has declared. | ||
Satisfaction-as- Pleasure (SP) | SP1 | I am satisfied with the pleasant experience of gamification activities in SDFS. | Adapted/modified from Babin et al. [62]; |
SP2 | I am satisfied with the interesting experience of shopping with entertainment. | Childers et al. [63]; Jones et al. [64]; | |
SP3 | I am satisfied with the excitement experience of shopping time-limited items. | Kim et al. [90]. | |
Fairness Atmospherics (FA) | FA1 | I know that the prices are fair. | Adapted/modified from |
FA2 | I know the purchasing procedures are fair. | Xia and Monroe [37]; | |
FA3 | I know the deals are fair. | Wang et al. [38]. | |
Continuance Participation | CPI1 | I will continuously participate in the next SDSFs for the good deals. | Adapted/modified from Kim et al. [90]; |
Intention (CPI) | CPI2 | I will prepare well in advance before the next SDSFs in the future. | Choo et al. [67]; Fang et al. [91]. |
CPI3 | I prefer to participating in the next SDSFs than others. |
Demographics | Frequency | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Female | 155 | 46.69% |
Male | 177 | 53.31% | |
Age | Less than 20 | 2 | 0.60% |
Between 21 and less than 30 | 135 | 40.66% | |
Between 31 and less than 40 | 131 | 39.46% | |
Between 41 and less than 50 | 50 | 15.06% | |
Greater than 50 | 14 | 4.22% | |
Education | High school | 14 | 4.22% |
University | 295 | 88.86% | |
Graduate school | 23 | 6.93% | |
Monthly income | Less than CNY 2000 | 9 | 2.71% |
Between CNY 2001 and less than CNY 5000 | 74 | 22.29% | |
Between CNY 5001 and less than CNY 8000 | 92 | 27.71% | |
Greater than CNY 8001 | 157 | 47.29% | |
Participating counts | Never | 16 | 4.82% |
Recently several times | 150 | 45.18% | |
Almost every time | 112 | 33.73% | |
Every time | 54 | 16.27% | |
Total | 332 | 100% |
Constructs | Items | Factor Loading | AVE | CR | Cronbach’s Alpha |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Promotion Scale (PS) | PS1 | 0.716 | 0.521 | 0.765 | 0.764 |
PS2 | 0.733 | 0.764 | |||
PS3 | 0.716 | ||||
Social Interaction (SI) | SI1 | 0.830 | 0.622 | 0.831 | 0.830 |
SI2 | 0.826 | ||||
SI3 | 0.704 | ||||
Satisfaction-as-Trust (ST) | ST1 | 0.771 | 0.557 | 0.790 | 0.789 |
ST2 | 0.729 | ||||
ST3 | 0.738 | ||||
Satisfaction-as-Pleasure (SP) | SP1 | 0.732 | 0.533 | 0.774 | 0.774 |
SP2 | 0.732 | ||||
SP3 | 0.725 | ||||
Fairness Atmospherics (FA) | FA1 | 0.757 | 0.554 | 0.788 | 0.788 |
FA2 | 0.774 | ||||
FA3 | 0.700 | ||||
Continuance Participation Intention (CPI) | CPI1 | 0.750 | 0.607 | 0.822 | 0.819 |
CPI2 | 0.769 | ||||
CPI3 | 0.817 |
PS | SI | ST | SP | FA | CPI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PS | 0.723 | |||||
SI | 0.500 | 0.789 | ||||
ST | 0.621 | 0.557 | 0.746 | |||
SP | 0.509 | 0.593 | 0.607 | 0.730 | ||
FA | 0.669 | 0.468 | 0.678 | 0.549 | 0.744 | |
CPI | 0.657 | 0.624 | 0.734 | 0.624 | 0.656 | 0.779 |
SI | SP | ST | PS | CPI | FA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SI1 | 0.768 | 0.252 | 0.094 | 0.114 | 0.257 | 0.215 |
SI2 | 0.718 | 0.221 | 0.163 | 0.176 | 0.353 | 0.068 |
SI3 | 0.833 | 0.174 | 0.200 | 0.152 | −0.021 | 0.078 |
SP1 | 0.214 | 0.726 | 0.160 | 0.204 | 0.204 | 0.089 |
SP2 | 0.226 | 0.833 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.107 | 0.174 |
SP3 | 0.204 | 0.559 | 0.383 | 0.106 | 0.174 | 0.270 |
ST1 | 0.186 | 0.171 | 0.662 | 0.132 | 0.435 | 0.169 |
ST2 | 0.191 | 0.354 | 0.735 | 0.210 | 0.087 | 0.133 |
ST3 | 0.208 | 0.040 | 0.534 | 0.232 | 0.350 | 0.401 |
PS1 | 0.207 | 0.170 | 0.041 | 0.612 | 0.319 | 0.293 |
PS2 | 0.115 | 0.177 | 0.114 | 0.771 | 0.277 | 0.137 |
PS3 | 0.180 | 0.110 | 0.391 | 0.724 | 0.019 | 0.216 |
CPI1 | 0.162 | 0.147 | 0.181 | 0.291 | 0.742 | 0.295 |
CPI2 | 0.333 | 0.354 | 0.387 | 0.152 | 0.483 | 0.111 |
CPI3 | 0.237 | 0.297 | 0.291 | 0.267 | 0.650 | 0.152 |
FA1 | 0.158 | 0.151 | 0.279 | 0.272 | 0.317 | 0.610 |
FA2 | 0.091 | 0.047 | 0.440 | 0.394 | 0.187 | 0.539 |
FA3 | 0.126 | 0.286 | 0.094 | 0.179 | 0.107 | 0.830 |
Constructs (Cronbach’s Alpha) | All Respondents | High FA Group | Low FA Group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Fairness Atmospherics (0.788) | 5.66 | 0.699 | 6.19 | 0.159 | 4.80 | 0.367 |
Promotion Scale (0.764) | 5.68 | 0.689 | 6.04 | 0.379 | 5.09 | 0.634 |
Social Interaction (0.830) | 5.20 | 1.120 | 5.54 | 0.997 | 4.66 | 0.851 |
Satisfaction-as-Trust (0.789) | 5.62 | 0.716 | 5.98 | 0.442 | 5.04 | 0.606 |
Satisfaction-as-Pleasure (0.774) | 5.38 | 0.790 | 5.66 | 0.650 | 4.93 | 0.695 |
Continuance Participation Intention (0.819) | 5.68 | 0.760 | 6.06 | 0.407 | 5.06 | 0.708 |
Independent Variable | Variable in Each Step | Standardized Coefficients | Change | F | p-Value | VIF | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Promotion Scale | Step 1 | 0.385 | 184.906 | 0.000 *** | |||
PS | 0.632 | 1.000 | |||||
Step 2 | 0.443 | 0.058 | 116.820 | 0.000 *** | |||
PS | 0.468 | 1.451 | |||||
FA | 0.502 | 1.451 | |||||
Step 3 | 0.459 | 0.016 | 82.717 | 0.004 ** | |||
PS | 0.620 | 2.847 | |||||
FA | 0.470 | 1.471 | |||||
PS × FA | −0.308 | 2.228 | |||||
Social Interaction | Step 1 | 0.311 | 132.991 | 0.000 *** | |||
SI | 0.446 | 1.000 | |||||
Step 2 | 0.433 | 0.122 | 112.363 | 0.000 *** | |||
SI | 0.322 | 1.194 | |||||
FA | 0.604 | 1.194 | |||||
Step 3 | 0.458 | 0.025 | 82.499 | 0.000 *** | |||
SI | 0.511 | 3.447 | |||||
FA | 0.596 | 1.257 | |||||
SI × FA | −0.288 | 3.013 |
Independent Variable | Variable in Each Step | Standardized Coefficients | Change | F | p-Value | VIF | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Promotion Scale | Step 1 | 0.259 | 102.895 | 0.000 *** | |||
PS | 0.544 | 1.000 | |||||
Step 2 | 0.277 | 0.018 | 56.437 | 0.006 ** | |||
PS | 0.446 | 1.451 | |||||
FA | 0.301 | 1.451 | |||||
Step 3 | 0.289 | 0.012 | 39.762 | 0.027 * | |||
PS | 0.584 | 2.847 | |||||
FA | 0.273 | 1.471 | |||||
PS × FA | −0.281 | 2.228 | |||||
Social Interaction | Step 1 | 0.352 | 160.129 | 0.000 *** | |||
SI | 0.498 | 1.000 | |||||
Step 2 | 0.382 | 0.030 | 90.744 | 0.000 *** | |||
SI | 0.434 | 1.194 | |||||
FA | 0.344 | 1.194 | |||||
Step 3 | 0.406 | 0.024 | 66.809 | 0.001 ** | |||
SI | 0.631 | 3.447 | |||||
FA | 0.273 | 1.257 | |||||
SI × FA | −0.302 | 3.013 |
Independent Variable | Variable in Each Step | Standardized Coefficients | Change | F | p-Value | VIF | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction-as-trust | Step 1 | 0.539 | 345.512 | 0.000 *** | |||
ST | 0.757 | 1.000 | |||||
Step 2 | 0.576 | 0.037 | 200.039 | 0.000 *** | |||
ST | 0.628 | 1.423 | |||||
FA | 0.411 | 1.423 | |||||
Step 3 | 0.589 | 0.013 | 139.713 | 0.004 ** | |||
ST | 0.775 | 3.092 | |||||
FA | 0.370 | 1.464 | |||||
ST × FA | −0.272 | 2.424 | |||||
Satisfaction-as-pleasure | Step 1 | 0.412 | 207.077 | 0.000 *** | |||
SP | 0.630 | 1.000 | |||||
Step 2 | 0.524 | 0.112 | 161.774 | 0.000 *** | |||
SP | 0.448 | 1.188 | |||||
FA | 0.651 | 1.188 | |||||
Step 3 | 0.547 | 0.023 | 117.962 | 0.000 *** | |||
SP | 0.688 | 2.978 | |||||
FA | 0.599 | 1.224 | |||||
SP × FA | −0.332 | 2.623 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, J.; Zhu, A.; Liu, D.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, N. Sustainability of China’s Singles Day Shopping Festivals: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Fairness Atmospherics on Consumers’ Continuance Participation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072644
Li J, Zhu A, Liu D, Zhao W, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Liu Y, Sun N. Sustainability of China’s Singles Day Shopping Festivals: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Fairness Atmospherics on Consumers’ Continuance Participation. Sustainability. 2020; 12(7):2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072644
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Jingyu, Anding Zhu, Dongsheng Liu, Wenmin Zhao, Yi Zhou, Yahui Chen, Yanni Liu, and Nan Sun. 2020. "Sustainability of China’s Singles Day Shopping Festivals: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Fairness Atmospherics on Consumers’ Continuance Participation" Sustainability 12, no. 7: 2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072644
APA StyleLi, J., Zhu, A., Liu, D., Zhao, W., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., & Sun, N. (2020). Sustainability of China’s Singles Day Shopping Festivals: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Fairness Atmospherics on Consumers’ Continuance Participation. Sustainability, 12(7), 2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072644