Innovation Management Systems and Standards: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors address a relevant subject and deal with it properly. I wold only suggest some minor comments.
Citations and impact of those publications should be mentioned and discussed to improve the literature analysis and discussion.
The conclusions are rather scant. After such rigorous analysis I would ecpect more comments on gap resources and review of the concluuions as well as practical management implications
Author Response
Dear Reviewer 1
Thank you for your suggestions, they have been immensely helpful, and we also appreciate your insightful comments
I have included your comments and my reply in the attached file
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The presented work provides a very useful literature review concept for the topic of innovation management. From Introduction to Conclusion sections, authors are fair to the proposed structure and therefore it is a nice-to-read work. It can be publishable in this journal; however, the minor concerns are:
1) Please prepare the study according to the journal guidelines so that the reviewer has a chance to look at the manuscript in the journal format
2) Remove gridlines in Figures 1 and 2.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer 2
Thank you for your suggestions, they have been immensely helpful, and we also appreciate your insightful comments
I have included your comments and my reply in the attached file
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The paper is very comprehensive and useful for IMS / St studies. However I suggest some revisions:
- although I understand the need for an in-depth analysis of the articles on the subject of the research, I find the article excessively long;
- in the abstract the authors state "we aim to discover the gaps still remaining in literature and outline future avenues of research in this domain" and, then, "A complete and accurate view of the latest literature on IMS / St is provided that identifies the main topics developed in management literature on IMS \ St as well as significant gaps and demonstrates the low maturity level of the current state of the field ". In both cases the final results are not clear enough.
For what has been said so far, further revisions are necessary.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer 3
Thank you for your suggestions, they have been immensely helpful, and we also appreciate your insightful comments
I have included your comments and my reply in the attached file
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
