Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Ionic Exchange and Macroporous Resins for Their Application on the Separation and Recovery of Chlorogenic Acid from the Wastewater of Artichoke Blanching
Previous Article in Journal
A GIS-CA Model for Planning Bikeways upon the Footpath Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
People’s Avoidance of Neighboring Agricultural Urban Green Infrastructure: Evidence from a Choice Experiment
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Preference Heterogeneity of Coastal Gray, Green, and Hybrid Infrastructure against Sea-Level Rise: A Choice Experiment Application in Japan

Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8927; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168927
by Yui Omori
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8927; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168927
Submission received: 13 July 2021 / Revised: 31 July 2021 / Accepted: 4 August 2021 / Published: 10 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-market Valuation of Urban Green Space)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find attached the comments.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors, 

I thank you for giving me the possibility to review the paper named "Preference heterogeneity of coastal gray, green, and hybrid in
frastructure against sea-level rise: A choice experiment applica
tion in Japan". I hope you and your family are safe and well.

I read twice your paper and I find it interesting. However I find out that some improvements are required :

a) You often speak about resilience. But I don't find a description or a definition what you mean in your case. I find out you have to define it and adapt to your study

b) About Simulation, why do you think to use dicrete model?I don't understand. I think you should consider dynamic model because the sea-rise depends on different factors that can be interralated. Look at this paper :  https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v9i4.9688 . The authors consider in safety management the dynamic approach. PLease consider it and improve your paper. I suggest only this, but they also reaserched about resilience and so on. But looking at your references, I find you studied it, even if there is no formulation. 

c) about conclusions  and discussions.  What is the real weakness of your model? What will be the research in future?

Please improve your paper, and you will get the result.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Back to TopTop