Next Article in Journal
Shared Mobility in Rural Contexts: Organizational Insights from Five Mobility-as-a-Service Pilots in Sweden
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Pavement Heterogeneity and Observation Angle on Lighting Design: Study with New Metrics
Previous Article in Journal
Convergence or Divergence? Emission Performance in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Countries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measuring Average Luminance for Road Lighting from Outside the Carriageway with Imaging Sensor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Average Luminance Calculation in Street Lighting Design, Comparison between BS-EN 13201 and RP-08 Standards

by
Alexandru Viorel Rusu
1,*,
Catalin Daniel Galatanu
2,*,
Gheorghe Livint
1 and
Dorin Dumitru Lucache
1
1
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technical University Gheorghe Asachi, 700050 Iasi, Romania
2
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, Technical University Gheorghe Asachi, 700050 Iasi, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(18), 10143; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810143
Submission received: 29 July 2021 / Revised: 27 August 2021 / Accepted: 30 August 2021 / Published: 10 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Outdoor Lighting)

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the influence of the observer’s position in relation to the calculation surface. This is the initial observation of the research, respectively that the two standards consider the position of the observer differently. For these situations, two types of calculations were performed. For the first set of calculations, the software used was DIALux 4.13 as this software can perform calculations in line with the RP-08 standard. The second set of calculations was performed with a script that offers the possibility to change the observer’s position. The conclusion was that EN-13201 has a better approach, but both standards could be improved. The second case study refers to the influence of the longitudinal observer position in an average luminance calculation. If one considers RP-08 as a guideline for performing the calculations, the conclusions are that changing the distance from the observer to the calculation surface has absolutely no effect on the average luminance value. On the other hand, if European standards are used as a guideline, changing the distance (from the standardized 60 m, either closer to the calculation surface or further away) can influence the overall results in average luminance and uniformity. Taking into account the results of these two case studies, the conclusion is that both RP-08 and BS-EN 13201 should be updated so that the observer’s distance in relation to the calculation surface would be a variable dependent on the stopping distance calculated based on the speed limit of the road.
Keywords: average luminance; lighting class; asphalt reflection; observer; uniformity average luminance; lighting class; asphalt reflection; observer; uniformity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rusu, A.V.; Galatanu, C.D.; Livint, G.; Lucache, D.D. Average Luminance Calculation in Street Lighting Design, Comparison between BS-EN 13201 and RP-08 Standards. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810143

AMA Style

Rusu AV, Galatanu CD, Livint G, Lucache DD. Average Luminance Calculation in Street Lighting Design, Comparison between BS-EN 13201 and RP-08 Standards. Sustainability. 2021; 13(18):10143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rusu, Alexandru Viorel, Catalin Daniel Galatanu, Gheorghe Livint, and Dorin Dumitru Lucache. 2021. "Average Luminance Calculation in Street Lighting Design, Comparison between BS-EN 13201 and RP-08 Standards" Sustainability 13, no. 18: 10143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810143

APA Style

Rusu, A. V., Galatanu, C. D., Livint, G., & Lucache, D. D. (2021). Average Luminance Calculation in Street Lighting Design, Comparison between BS-EN 13201 and RP-08 Standards. Sustainability, 13(18), 10143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop