Next Article in Journal
Plant Species Composition and the Perception of the Afforestation in Urban Public Green Spaces in a Municipality in Eastern Brazilian Amazon
Previous Article in Journal
Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Adjoining Sediment of River Ecosystem
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Energy Management and Power Management Systems for Microgrid and Nanogrid Applications

1
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Power Electronics, Machines and Controls Research Group, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, China
3
Institute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
4
Institute of Sustainable Energy, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(18), 10331; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810331
Submission received: 18 August 2021 / Revised: 10 September 2021 / Accepted: 10 September 2021 / Published: 16 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)

Abstract

:
In the past few years, the application and research community has expressed a lot of interest in managing energy and power while using distributed generation systems. Electricity generation and its usage coordination are vital aspects of energy efficiency that can help in saving energy, decreasing energy costs, and fulfilling global emission objectives. Owing to the relevance of the topic, here, the researchers have presented a comparative and critical review of recent developments in the fields of energy management systems (EMSs) and power management systems (PMSs). Furthermore, the researchers also reviewed the various EMS and PMS methods that could be used for reviewing microgrid (MG) and nanogrid (NG) systems. The EMS for MG and NG systems helps in addressing important economic objectives like minimisation of operational costs after optimising the fuel costs, emission costs, and battery degradation costs, while also improving the life of the MG devices. Alternatively, the PMS helps in addressing technical objectives like improving the stability, flexibility, reliability, and quality of MG and NG systems. The researchers have also discussed the drawbacks and challenges affecting the widespread application of EMSs and PMSs.

1. Introduction

The microgrid (MG) and nanogrid (NG) systems make use of various renewable energy sources (RESs) such as solar photovoltaic systems (PVs), wind systems, and small-hydro systems. Due to the erratic nature of the solar PV and wind RES, many energy storage devices (ESDs) such as ultracapacitors, batteries, and flywheel ESDs can be used for supporting the output power emitted from the RES. The energy storage system (ESS) is configured using either an individual or multiple ESD in a hybrid ESS. The ESS is designed to be used for peak load shaving, load following, intermittent RES output power levelling, and energy arbitrage. Furthermore, many of the smart invertors that are used in the RES and ESS provide ancillary services such as a fault ride-through (FRT) capability and better power quality [1]. For achieving all the above functions, a high-level control is required for managing the energy and power in the RES and the ESS. RESs in microgrids have been actively used in several applications, including residential uses [2], industries [3], university districts [4], and logistics facilities [5].
The energy management system (EMS) and the power management system (PMS) are quite different with regard to their control objectives and compensation duration. In the course of strategy development for energy management, researchers need to consider key parameters such as maintenance costs, fuel costs, capital cost, and system life. The EMSs used in both the grid-connected and off-grid NGs and MGs help in optimising the power flow, energy generation, and its usage amongst the distributed energy sources [6]. In the past few years, the optimisation of EMSs for NGs and MGs has come to be regarded as an important research topic and many researchers have presented a variety of options which could be used for energy management in different distribution systems. EMSs are used in distribution systems for controlling increasing demand for electric power, decreasing future emissions, and achieving a gain in socio-economic benefits for sustainable growth. On the other hand, power, current, and voltage are the major parameters which are considered in PMSs as they can affect the instantaneous operational conditioning. Additionally, the PMS can be used in distribution systems for improving the dynamic response of the MGs and NGs under differing load conditions. A PMS helps in solving various issues such as maintaining transient stability while connecting and disconnecting a particular device to the system, allowing a smooth transition from grid-connected to islanded modes and vice versa, as well as optimal utilisation of RESs [7]. Considering the description above, it can be said that the EMS is associated with energy economic objectives, while the PMS is associated with technical aims.
To date, very few researchers have discussed EMSs from differing perspectives. For example, some researchers have proposed different control techniques, such as centralised, decentralised, distributed, and hierarchical, for MG and NG applications, while others have proposed a few prediction techniques for the load and generation in MGs and NGs [8]. None of the researchers reviewed the state-of-the-art operating methods, solution algorithms, objective functions of optimisation, or challenges and drawbacks of the existing research on EMSs and PMSs. Here, this review paper focuses on the differences between EMSs and PMSs based on different optimisation and planning methodologies that are used for strategic, economic, and tactical purposes in MG and NG applications using RESs and ESDs to provide basic information to other researchers who may choose to delve more deeply into this topic. Many research papers focus on EMS and PMS techniques separately. This review paper consolidates and compares the differences between EMSs and PMSs for NG and MG applications.
In this study, the researchers have reviewed and highlighted the published papers that have either implemented or studied EMS and PMS strategies. Furthermore, this review can be used as a basis for designing an in-depth technical study of existing EMS and PMS techniques. In the past few years, both EMS and PMS studies have garnered a lot of research attention. Hence, an updated and comparative review of these studies is necessary. In this review, the researchers have summarised and classified several vital criteria affecting the implementation of EMS and PMS techniques in different MG and NG applications.
Four digital databases were searched to identify targeted articles: (1) the Scopus database which includes the largest number of abstracts as well as reviewed literature, (2) the Science Direct database which offers access to technical, scientific, and journalistic articles, (3) the IEEE Xplore Library of Technical Literature in Engineering and Technology, and (4) Web of Science (WOS), which is known for indexing various research works in both social science and science fields. The chosen databases are known to be rich in terms of different high-impact scientific journals, showcasing their scientific integrity and academic resilience, and are thus regarded as apt for this review.
The search was started in October 2020 by utilising the advanced search boxes available in the four chosen scientific databases (Science Direct, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and WOS). The article search process employed Boolean operators (i.e., OR, AND) as well as two groups of keywords (i.e., queries). During the searching and filtering processes, the article content was chosen on the basis of research and review articles. This option was regarded to be optimum for gaining access to the most related and latest contents pertaining to this review’s assigned topic.
This review is organised into eight sections. Section 1 provides an overview of both EMSs and PMSs. Section 2 discusses the different MG and NG configurations used in RESs and ESDs. Section 3 describes the MG reconfiguration. Section 4 and Section 5 describe the existing EMSs and PMSs based on optimisation and planning methodologies that are used for strategic, economic, and tactical purposes in MG and NG systems, respectively. Furthermore, Section 6 presents the comparison between the PMS and EMS strategies which are based on architecture and control techniques. In Section 7, the challenges and limitations associated with the application of the EMS and PMS are discussed. Finally, conclusions of this review are presented in Section 8.

2. Microgrids (MGs) and Nanogrids (NGs)

A microgrid (MG) is regarded as a power distribution system, which can integrate different distributed generations such as non-renewable or renewable energy sources and ESSs [9]. An MG can augment these sources to cater to the load demand of small communities such as university campuses, factories, and hospitals. This then turns into a flexible, controllable power subsystem that has the ability to disconnect from or connect to the main power grid.
MGs are found in low-voltage as well as medium-voltage operating ranges, usually from 400 V to 69 kV [10]. Furthermore, they are different sizes. They can be large and intricate networks, up to tens of MW in magnitude, with different storage units and generation resources attending multiple loads. Conversely, MGs can be small and modest structures, ranging in hundreds of kW, catering to only a few consumers. When further scaling down of the MG concept occurs, a new name, ‘NG’, is acquired [11].
A nanogrid (NG), refers to a localised power generation and distribution system that can be used for a single house or small building. It has an installed capacity of ≤50 kVA [11]. It is used in rural regions, as the construction of the transmission and distribution lines for supplying the power lines to these regions is costly. However, in the past few years, NGs have been installed in many urban regions where roof-top solar PV generators have been combined with ESDs. In these urban regions, the NG systems have been designed in such a manner that they can operate regardless of whether they are connected to or disconnected from the utility.
The role of an MG is different to that of an NG in the power pyramid. For instance, NGs are frequently of lower power and less intricate compared to MGs. Furthermore, by linking several NGs, an MG can be created as depicted in Figure 1. This presents an alternative methodology for the conventional MG, which can be discussed based on the difference between MGs and NGs.
The possible markets for NGs are not similar to that of MGs. An NG permits acquisition of a power structure at a relatively lower cost compared to an MG. Consequently, the interest shifts from large/manifold investors to small/limited business proprietors [11].
Figure 2 presents the block diagram of an NG which is integrated with an RES such as wind turbines (WTs) and/or photovoltaics (PVs) in different combinations and an ESS such as ultracapacitors and batteries.

2.1. Renewable Energy Source (RES) and Energy Storage Devices (ESDs)

In the recent past, many RESs, especially solar PVs and WTs, have been considered worldwide as both an alternative and competitive energy source for MGs and NGs [12]. Many advantages are displayed by PVs and WTs in providing site-dependent and clean renewable energy with low maintenance costs.
Many alternative RESs have been used for improving the stability, availability, and reliability of energy, with regard to supply and demand. In this section, the researchers have described solar PVs and wind generators as well as batteries and ultracapacitors [13].

2.1.1. Photovoltaic (PV)

Photovoltaic (PV) cells are defined as semiconductor devices which directly convert solar energy into direct current (DC) electric energy. These are regarded as significant devices that provide power for different applications such as remote buildings, grid-connected systems (e.g., at the utility or residential scale), and satellites. Hence, the efforts of many researchers have focused on maximising the efficiency and minimising the manufacturing costs of PV cells [14]. The majority of PV cells used in large-scale applications are made using crystalline silicon as it is inexpensive and readily available in the PV markets. However, crystalline silicon is regarded as a primary technology and was first introduced in the 1970s [15].
Figure 3 presents the basic structure of the PV cells. It consists of different electrical components, such as the current source (Iph) and the diode (D). In addition, other components are needed for a more accurate modelling, such as a shunt resistor Rsh, parallel capacitor Cp, series resistor Rs, and a series inductor Ls.
The PV array can convert light photons into electrons. This technique generates the DC current that is stepped up using the DC-DC converters before it is inverted to supply AC power to the loads. Hence, the power electronic converters play a vital role in grid-connected PV systems. The DC-AC converter output can be filtered using a low-pass filter to eliminate any undesirable harmonics before being connected to a grid [13]. Additionally, a maximum power point tracking system (MPPT) is used to allow optimal energy extraction from the solar rays by altering their incident angle throughout the day.
For increasing the terminal current or voltage of the PV generators, researchers can connect the PV cells in series, parallel, or their combination. If the PV cells are connected in series, it is noted that their voltages are summed. On the other hand, if they are connected in parallel, their currents get summed together. One silicon PV cell displays an output voltage ranging between 0.5 and 0.7 V, while its output power is 4.5 W. Many of the PV installations such as satellites and rooftop panels need a higher voltage than the voltage that is produced using one PV cell. Hence, multiple PV cells are connected in series. A general commercial solar PV module consists of 72–96 cells that are connected in series. Considering that each cell generates 0.5 V and 9 A, every PV module is able to generate ≈ 324 W. Thereafter, several modules can be connected in series to generate 1000Vdc (22 modules) or 1500Vdc (33 modules). The life span of the PV panels can be more than 25 years, during which they can display a natural degradation in their output power, which ranges from 0.5–1 percent every year [16].

2.1.2. Wind

Wind energy can be converted to electric energy using wind turbines (WTs). In this process, wind moves the blades of the turbines, where mechanical energy is converted to electrical energy through the WTs and an electrical generator. However, the availability of wind energy is affected by different local and natural conditions such as power demand profiles and other factors related to WTs such as air density, wind speed, and blade radius, or a degradation in their performance because of ageing. On the other hand, wind energy systems in the MG act as a backup system that can provide an uninterruptible power supply (using an ESS). It also provides low-voltage support or transfers surplus energy to the grids for improved economic benefits [17].
For improving the performance of the wind energy systems, the researchers needed to extensively process the data, analyse the electrical networks, and characterise the effect of the power quality on the general plant performance. Thus, the data needed for assessing the real-time performance of the WT are limited to three real-time variables, i.e., turbine output power (W), rotational speed of the turbines (rad/s), and wind speed (m/s). For each machine installed in the field, additional data analysis and information are required, namely, the distribution of each of the following parameters: wind speed, load current, generator voltage, and wind turbine speed [18].
Recent studies conducted in this field have highlighted the need to develop WTs and other auxiliary equipment. Extensive and persistent research carried out in WT-RESs has helped in decreasing the installation costs and size of the WTs. A low wind speed is still regarded as a challenge during the wind speed prediction. The wind energy potential is dependent on accurate wind speed estimation, site selection for farms, the operation scheme, etc. Hence, the researchers in this field are more focused on developing an optimal design of the wind farms that includes the design of the WTs and layout of the farms. However, the major difficulty that was noted in planning the layout and design of the wind farm was the availability of the wind forecast data compared to solar forecast data, since the wind forecast data are not widely available. This factor is responsible for making the solar energy PV system more predictable compared to the wind RES. As a result, the design and siting of wind farms require a lot of investigation and a thorough wind analysis of the proposed site. Figure 4 presents the basic design of a wind energy conversion system (WECS). In the wind RES, the wind force helps in converting the wind power to a mechanical torque that is rotated to generate an electric current. WECSs are further classified into a variable or a fixed speed system. Double fed induction generators (DFIGs) and permanent magnet synchronous generators (PMSGs) are some of the advanced technologies used in the development of variable speed WTs. The WT is connected to a generator via the gearbox, while the capacitor bank is connected to a DC link of the power electronics interface. Thereafter, the output voltage of the DC-AC power electronics interface can be filtered. A transformer is used to match the voltage to a microgrid load [19].

2.1.3. Battery Energy Storage System

Batteries are devices used for storing electrical energy through the process of charging chemical cells, so that they can be reused (i.e., discharged), whenever needed. There are different types of batteries such as Ni–metal hydride (NiMH), lead–acid, reduction–oxidation (redox), lithium-ion (Li-ion), and sodium sulphur (NaS). In this section, the researchers have described the Li-ion and lead–acid types of batteries, since they are most commonly used for energy storage and preservation for various wind and solar PV applications [20,21].
Figure 5 presents the equivalent circuit of a battery that consists of three components, i.e., (1) internal resistance, Rself, that helps in determining the self-discharge energy loss that takes place during the energy storage operations; (2) battery current, Ibat, that depends on the charging and discharging activities; and (3) capacitance, C, that accounts for the complete charge that is stored in a battery as a scaled voltage drop, VSOC, with a per unit value between 0 and 1.
  • Lead–Acid
The lead–acid battery is the oldest battery technology. It provides a large amount of power at a low cost. Hence, it can be used for applications that require a large amount of surge power support with a lower depth of discharge (DOD) such as emergency power, a backup power supply (e.g., an uninterruptable power supply (UPS)), and power quality management. On the other hand, this battery technology also has many disadvantages such as a short life cycle and low energy density. Over-discharging and deep cycling can negatively affect the life span of these batteries. Recently, many new developments in this technology have been carried out using advanced materials such as gel cells and absorbed glass mats. This advanced technology is called valve-regulated lead–acid batteries and they have displayed a better performance, longer life span, and lower maintenance [21].
  • Lithium-Ion
Lithium-ion batteries present many features such as high energy density, high performance, and a long life cycle (~1000 cycles). Due to these features, Li-ion batteries are considered to be better than lead–acid batteries for energy storage and can be used in various applications such as mobile products, electric vehicles, customer electronic devices, RES generation support, and frequency regulation at a utility level [22].

2.1.4. Ultracapacitor

The ultracapacitor helps in the process of charging or discharging a device at a higher power within seconds. Compared to batteries, the ultracapacitor shows a longer life span (~105 cycles) [23]. It can be completely discharged without significantly affecting its life span. Ultracapacitors show a low energy density compared to other ESDs such as batteries when they have a higher power density. Hence, the ultracapacitors can be used in applications that require a higher rate of power with a shorter deep cycle, such as backup power supplies, DC link voltage support in a converter, EV acceleration and deceleration, and a power quality correction in various utility applications [24,25]. Figure 6 describes the equivalent circuit model of the ultracapacitor that includes a self-discharging resistor, Rsd, a cell, and a junction resistance, Rs. Rss and Css depict the transient response of the ultracapacitor.
Ultracapacitors are categorised into three types. Type 1 includes the electrical double-layer capacitor (EDLC) which relies on the electrostatic field between two plates. Type 2 presents the pseudocapacitors which use electrochemical reactions to store the electric charge. Hybrid capacitors are the third type and they combine the EDLC and the pseudocapacitors and provide a higher capacitance compared to pseudocapacitors and EDLCs [26].

3. Microgrid Reconfiguration

To run the MG in an optimum and effective manner, one of the recommended technologies is MG reconfiguration [27]. Reconfiguration can be regarded as a kind of emergency control, including load and generation shedding and changes in topology, as well as other control measures, for redirecting power flow towards the remaining loads. An effectual and optimum reconfiguration entails smart and swift actions. Therefore, identifying a precise numerical or heuristic technique is quite necessary [28].
The primarily aim of reconfiguration is to reduce losses and improve load balancing at the network level by taking into account the maximum possible network and targeting to maintain an optimum voltage profile in the system. Numerous methodologies have been recommended for the optimisation techniques to attain optimum reconfiguration [29].
Recent attempts have accounted for the operating costs [30], including the distributed energy resource (DER) shutdown/start-up costs, as well as the uncertainty costs [31]. Additionally, researchers enhanced the reliability and power quality of the MG [32,33]. The research work mentioned in [34] regards limits placed on the apparent power rather than the individual reactive and real power limits. Furthermore, for system stability management, reconfiguration could be regarded as a useful tool, i.e., keeping the microgrid at a distance from the unstable region [28]. Moreover, researchers minimised the overall power losses and enhanced the distribution network’s voltage profile [35,36].

4. Energy Management System (EMS)

The first EMS in the world was designed during the 1960s. However, during the 1970s, it was renamed as an energy control centre (ECC). Following this, it was again renamed the supervisory control and data acquisition EMS (SCADA-EMS) and was used as a data tracking and collection system, and was commonly used in industrial facilities. The SCADA used advanced computational programs during the early 1990s and was converted to a real-time supervisory controller called the EMS. This system included many activities such as demand side management (DSM), load control (LC), and a distribution management system (DMS) [37].
The current EMS refers to a computerised program that is used for monitoring and controlling the functioning of every element and flow of power to optimise the MG and NG systems and also obtain optimal productivity [38]. The EMS helps in optimally distributing multiple energy sources to their customers without conceding the protection, safety, and efficiency of the system [39]. The EMS monitors, controls, optimises, and regulates the load, transmission, distribution, and generation-related activities [40]. Hence, the basic function of the EMS was the creation of an effective balance between demand and supply. This balance maintenance is cost-effective even under some financial uncertainties and limitations (uncertainties in an EMS architecture can include fluctuations during the generation of RESs, electricity costs, and load activities). It can function with dispatch, power, SCADA, energy scheduling, real-time accounting, and transmission security management. With the growth in the grid after the integration of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs), ESSs, RESs, buildings with a higher power need, and other variables, the design and the function of the EMS is becoming more complicated. In the past few years, processes based on machine learning (ML) and the Internet of Things (IoT) have garnered a lot of attention and have proved to be helpful in the operation of EMSs [41,42].
The two key components of the EMS are DSM and demand response (DR), which aid in enhancing the MG and NG systems’ load profile, decreasing peak demand, and effectively employing system assets. Even though DR and DSM are often employed interchangeably, it should be noted that that are not the same thing. As per the user’s perspective, the DSM is aimed at improving flexibility. The application pertaining to DSM programs could range from increasing energy efficiency with improved insulation materials to energy systems that are completely self-contained and can automatically respond to changes in supply/demand [43].
Energy management in the MG and NG systems requires a comprehensive automatic system that helps in obtaining optimal resource scheduling [44]. This system relies on advanced information technology and control objectives for optimising the management of the ESS and distributed energy sources. Many researchers have ensured energy management by optimising various objective functions that are regarded in the energy management process such as maximising the generator output power at a specified time, maximising the ESD life span, minimising the operational costs of the MG and NG systems, and minimising the greenhouse gas emission costs.

4.1. Energy Management System Techniques

After considering one or multiple control objectives, different techniques can be used for optimising the EMS in MG and NG systems. These techniques take into consideration reduced costs during maintenance, emission costs, operational and fuel costs, and ESD (battery or super capacitor) degradation costs.
Many studies have proposed EMS processes that use different techniques and offer effective and optimal solutions for the MG and NG operations. These techniques have been segmented by the researchers by considering the planning and optimisation methodologies employed for strategic, tactical, and economic purposes. All these processes and techniques have been outlined below.

4.1.1. Energy Management Based on Mixed Integer Linear and Non-Linear Programming Methods

Mixed integer linear programming (MILP) and the mixed integer non-linear programming (MINLP) processes were regarded as the classical optimisation techniques. Furthermore, the objective functions and constraints used in the linear programming system include linear functions and real values. They include the determination of optimal value decision variables that help in determining the set of quantities.
In an earlier study [45], researchers presented the EMS for hybrid islanded AC/DC MG systems. Their proposed algorithm helped in controlling the system and ensuring the stable operation of the MG, while also providing clean water to customers. This optimisation algorithm was based on the MINLP system, wherein the objective functions decreased the daily operational costs.
A different MINLP and global optimisation technique-based EMS was proposed for an MG system that consisted of solar PVs, diesel generators, wind, fuel cells, microturbines, and battery storage systems. This proposed algorithm helped in minimising the cost of the distributed generation (DG) and the amount of greenhouse emissions. Furthermore, it also considered the no-load costs of the distributed generators, non-linear losses within the DG, non-linear losses in a distribution system, and the start-up/shutdown costs of a DG. The researchers noted that the battery storage system played a vital role in minimising the generation costs and number of emissions, while also compensating for generation shortage [46].
A networked NG consisting of an EV-battery swapping station (BSS) could also be considered as a cyber-physical energy management system (CPEMS) [47]. The researchers proposed an algorithm for optimising the reliability, economics, and resilience of the energy supply system. This optimisation problem was based on MILP. Results indicated that the proposed CPEMS showed many economic benefits, ensured reliability and battery storage, and prevented the under-utilisation of the capital-intensive PVs.
The present study proposes a MILP model to address challenges concerning energy management and planning integrated operations for a smart seaport grid (such as a port MG) comprising PV and battery storage infrastructure. The objective is to minimise the overall operational cost due to delays and optimise energy costs considering hourly tariffs and the choice to sell energy under PV uncertainties. The endeavour concerning operation planning is to ascertain the yard equipment, including the quay crane count, requiring assignment to vessels considering one-hour intervals. Planning also requires optimising ship berthing time, directly affecting cold-ironing energy needs and reefer container availability. The outcomes indicate that the port MG scenario is superior to typical settings for cost optimisation [48].
An EMS-based non-linear optimisation framework is formulated to regulate battery scheduling and facilitate a reduction in operation cost for a PV and battery DC MG system tethered to the grid. The suggested framework incorporates ageing parameters and empirical data associated with real-world cost degradation of Li-ion batteries. The Li-ion battery degradation cost (BDC) expression is formulated considering the impact of the battery DOD and temperature on performance. Additionally, cold and hot climate areas are accounted for to ascertain the PV-specific levelised cost of energy. The framework also models energy losses and nodal voltages to allow the DC MG to operate optimally. The outcomes indicate that the DC MG operational cost was reduced significantly [49].

4.1.2. Energy Management Based on Dynamic Programming (DP) and Rule-Based Methods

A dynamic programming technique was used for solving complex problems that could be sequenced and discretised. This problem could be classified into many sub-problems that were solved optimally. Thereafter, these solutions were superimposed to develop an optimal solution for the primary problem [50].
In [51], the researchers developed an effective centralised rule-based EMS for the islanded and grid-connected MGs. This algorithm was developed such that it kept the battery’s state of charge (SOC) below 80% in the islanded MG mode. On the other hand, the battery SOC in the grid-connected MG mode had to be maintained above 60% to ensure reliability in the islanded mode operations. This technique allowed a smooth transition between the two modes and ensured voltage and frequency stability of the systems.
Another EMS based on dynamic programming for controlling the MG system was proposed in [52]. It included wind energy and battery systems. The objective function of this EMS was to increase the selling benefits of wind energy and minimise the costs of fulfilling the load demands in the MG. This EMS also regarded the deregulation of the energy market, where electricity prices were allowed to fluctuate based on the demand and supply. Furthermore, the battery control action was also determined at differing price intervals, while the computation time was decreased in the large-scale BESS systems.
In [53], the researchers proposed a new EMS for the islanded NG. It consisted of solar PVs, fuel cell generation, and battery storage. This EMS algorithm was proposed to achieve better scheduling of the battery charging and discharging processes and minimising the operational costs of generation. Furthermore, the researchers used stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) for optimising the EMS. They also used the Markov model for predicting the solar PV irradiation cycle. Their simulation results indicated that SDP was more effective than the rule-based technique. Furthermore, the SDP-based approach ensured minimal operating costs as it minimised the fuel generator operating time during every cycle. This simultaneously improved the battery availability in the upcoming cycle as the SOC was elevated at the end of every cycle.
In [54], the authors used a novel algorithm for the PV-NG system that was integrated with battery storage and diesel generation. This proposed algorithm was DP based and included the objective function to improve the system’s power flow. The results indicated that this proposed algorithm could achieve a maximal PV energy utilisation, low diesel fuel consumption, and less battery life loss, in comparison to the rule-based technique.
A dynamic programming technique was proposed in [55] for the islanded MG that included solar PVs, diesel generation, and a battery storage system. This technique ensured optimal energy management, where the researchers aimed to minimise CO2 emission costs and operational costs by improving the scheduling system for the distributed energy resources (DERs). However, some drawbacks of this technique were the DER capacitance and low power balance between demand and supply.

4.1.3. Energy Management Based on Metaheuristic Techniques

The metaheuristic method is regarded as an alternative process for MG optimisation, as it combines different processes such as a genetic algorithm (GA), biological evolution, and statistical mechanisms for deriving the optimal solution for controlling energy sources in the MG system.
A multi-objective EMS was proposed so that the MG could achieve effective load dispatch and low battery degradation costs [56]. With the help of the GA and rule-based techniques, the researchers could obtain real-time control of the energy sources and could predict them on the previous day. They used a diesel and battery generator to supply energy and fulfil the load demands in real time. They also suggested load shedding for maintaining the balance between the load demand and the amount of electrical power generated.
In [57], the researchers proposed a new optimal scheduling control technique for an EMS that was based on the binary particle swarm optimisation (BPSO) for MGs with wind energy, solar PV, fuel cells, a diesel generator, and batteries in a virtual power plant (VPP). This proposed algorithm helped in minimising the overall system costs. The results indicated that the technique could efficiently minimise the grid energy consumption to 47%, while the CO2 emission was reduced by 8.46%. The binary PSO showed its best performance while minimising the CO2 emissions, saving costs, and decreasing energy consumption.
A different EMS was proposed based on the particle swarm optimisation (PSO) and Gaussian mutation for a standalone hybrid MG system that included a solar PV module, wind energy, battery storage, and diesel generation. The simulation results indicated that this algorithm could minimise fuel costs and system capital costs [58].
Another EMS based on the artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm was proposed for improving the economic dispatch for the isolated MG that included WTs, solar PV, energy storage, and dispatchable generation [59]. However, owing to the intermittent RES and load demand, the neural network was combined with the Markov chain to predict the output of the power sources. This led to a 30% decrease in energy costs.
In [60], the researchers proposed an expert system based on fuzzy logic that was combined with metaheuristic algorithms, called the grey wolf optimisation, for improving the MG grid. The main objectives of this system included the minimisation of generation unit costs and a reduction in the emissions of fuel sources. The researchers considered battery optimal capacity, which helped in minimising fuel consumption. Furthermore, the results indicated that the proposed system showed a higher efficiency compared to the GA, PSO, grey wolf optimisation, BAT, and the improved BAT methods with regard to fulfilling the objectives and minimising the operational costs of the MG.
A novel EMS was proposed based on the load prediction for 24 h for an MG which includes solar PV modules, WTs, microturbines, and storage units [61]. This EMS used the artificial fish swarm optimisation technique. The control objectives of this technique included the minimisation of costs noted in the power generation system. The results of this technique indicated that it improved the utilisation of renewable and non-renewable energy generation as well as provided better charge and discharge activities of the batteries.

4.1.4. Energy Management Based on Multi-Agent Systems

A multi-agent optimisation technique helps in the decentralised management of the MG. This technique includes human behaviour-related components for fulfilling all specified objectives.
A multi-agent-based algorithm was proposed for grid outage management for two MG systems in an earlier study [62]. The MGs included solar PV modules, wind energy, load, and battery storage. The main objective of the control algorithm was to decrease operational costs from PV intermittency and the stochastic nature of the critical load. The researchers also considered the price variations in the grid and critical load. Simulation results showed that the outage management algorithm effectively maximised the power generation of the MG system and minimised the system operational costs.
A new multi-agent-based EMS was proposed for a standalone MG system that consisted of fuel cells, RESs (wind and PV), and an ESS [63]. The control objectives of the algorithm included the maintenance of the balance between the energy demand and supply. Additionally, the researchers used auto regressive moving average (ARMA) models to forecast the PV irradiation, wind speed, atmospheric temperature, and the load that is connected to the system. The results showed that the proposed EMS could adjust to the variations in temperature, irradiation, wind speed, and load conditions.
A decentralised EMS that used the multi-agent technique was proposed for an MG which included batteries, an electrolyser, solar PVs, wind, diesel generation, and fuel cells. The researchers also included fuzzy logic with cognitive maps for optimally managing the MG activities. Thereafter, the researchers compared the centralised and decentralised approaches and noted that the decentralised process presented many operational advantages with regard to system breakdown or failure [64].
Furthermore, a new multi-agent-based EMS was proposed for the MG. It combined the centralised and decentralised approaches and could optimise the economic operations of the MG system. The researchers noted that a centralised EMS can communicate with all DERs in an MG only in the presence of a centralised decision-making entity. The control commands could be transmitted from the centralised controller to local controllers in the DERs. However, the decentralised control can assign communication between the DERs without using any centralised controller [65].

4.1.5. Energy Management Based on Fuzzy Logic (FL) and Neural Network (NN)

In [66], the researchers presented an EMS design based on full-load (FL) control for smooth power production in an interconnected residential MG. This MG system included RESs such as wind and PV, while the battery was the storage energy source along with the load. This proposed algorithm decreased the power fluctuations and peaks when energy was exchanged between the MG and the main grids. This also improved the life cycle of the battery as the SOC level was maintained near 75%. The proposed technique showed a better and more efficient performance compared to other states of charge-based EMS techniques.
An optimal EMS based on fuzzy logic control (FLC) was proposed in [67] for the independent DC MG in the ZigBee-based communication network. This algorithm ensured a better utilisation of the RES and improved the life cycle of battery storage. All experiments validated the effectiveness of the proposed technique.
In [68], the researchers presented an effective EMS that was based on the multi-objective strategy for an MG that included solar PVs, WTs, microturbines, fuel cells, and a battery storage system. This algorithm helped in minimising the CO2 emission and operational costs of the MG. This included activities such as battery charging and discharging rates that were determined using the FL system. Furthermore, the researchers introduced a neural network to predict the RES load demand and power generation. This proposed technique minimised the operational costs and emission levels of the MG. Additionally, the fuzzy expert system was introduced to decrease the maintenance costs of the battery, allowing battery scheduling as it extended the operational life span of the battery via the lower depth of the battery discharge.
A novel EMS model based on the Lagrange programming neural network (NN) approach was introduced for optimising the performance of MG systems that included solar PVs, WTs, microturbines, a battery bank, fuel cells, and a diesel generator [69]. This model helped in minimising the overall MG costs in addition to the fuel costs, operational and maintenance costs, and the emission costs of the generator units. The researchers employed a radial basis neural network that could predict the load demand and the RES power generation. The loads could be classified into four types, i.e., price-sensitive load, controllable load, thermal load, and critical load. This proposed technique was seen to be more effective than the PSO.
Another EMS based on the NN technique was designed and proposed for a grid-connected MG that included solar PVs, WTs, batteries, and electrical cars. This model aimed to maximise the power supplied by PVs and WTs and minimise the power import from the utility grid. The model helped in improving the life cycle of the batteries when the discharge depth was set at 60%. The researchers considered two kinds of load demand (i.e., critical and ordinary). They also developed an extended Kalman filter with a hybrid wavelet function-based NN technique for predicting the load and power generation in the RES [70].

4.1.6. Energy Management Based on Other Artificial Intelligent Methods

In [71], the researchers developed an EMS leader–follower algorithm that was based on the game theory technique used for a grid-connected MG. This technique helped in maximising the MG profit exclusively with the prosumers while also maintaining the Stackelberg equilibrium to ensure a reasonable share of the distribution profit. The operators of the MG made use of different prosumers while the evolution used a non-linear programming technique to fulfil the Stackelberg equilibrium. This proposed approach helped in increasing the number of PV prosumers, which improved the MG profits and enabled a better convergence rate.
Another EMS was developed based on the rolling horizon Markov strategy for grid-connected MG systems that included WTs, combination of heating and power generation (CHP), and a battery storage system. This algorithm helped in reducing the gas costs and minimised the electricity costs after considering the intermittency of the wind power that was modelled using the Markov decision process (MDP). This proposed approach indicated that it was more effective with regard to performance and computation time compared to the scenario tree-based approach [72].
In [73], the researchers developed an optimal EMS for an NG that included battery, PV, and ultracapacitor devices for a house. This proposed algorithm aimed to improve battery charging and discharging activity. It was also based on the rolling optimisation process. MILP was used for resolving the optimisation problem. The researchers also proposed a technique for alleviating the power fluctuations between the NG and main grid using a smoothing function.
Another adaptive intelligent-based EMS was proposed for the grid-connected MG that was integrated with the RESs (wind and PV) and ESSs (battery and supercapacitor). The main objectives of this model were to obtain a maximal power utilisation of RESs, reducing the load fluctuations, and managing the system power dispatch. Combining the battery with the super capacitor can significantly help in managing the smooth load as the smooth capacitor can handle the sudden load fluctuations and variations. This proposed algorithm displayed an effective ratio between the real-time energy discharge and available energy in comparison to the PSO [74].

4.1.7. Energy Management Based on Stochastic and Robust Programming Methods

A novel multi-objective stochastic technique-based EMS was proposed for the hybrid grid-connected MG that included various RESs such as WTs and solar PVs in [75]. The objective of this proposed algorithm was aimed at minimising the energy losses in the MG and operational costs in the RESs. The optimisation problem could be resolved by using a weighting sum for the feeding loss systems and total operational costs. The researchers noted that this proposed technique solved the MILP problem when they tested the algorithm using the IEEE 37 node distribution system.
Another stochastic problem-based algorithm was developed for the grid-connected MG for minimising the traditional generator operational costs, decreasing the commercial costs matching the grid energy, and increasing the battery life span. This algorithm included two steps, in which step one carried out MG optimisation and step 2 analysed the output power for computing real-time energy loss in the MG [76].
An optimal EMS was proposed for the grid-connected MG that included battery storage, PEVs, and solar PVs. The researchers also considered the load and RES uncertainties. This proposed algorithm could be classified into two sub-problems, wherein the first problem included scheduling within the energy boundaries that were defined to protect the system. The second problem assessed the real-time ability of the energy deviation limit to regulate the frequencies. This algorithm was more cost-effective compared to other techniques [77].
In [78], the researchers proposed a decentralised EMS for the grid-connected MG that consisted of wind power, solar PVs, train stations, and batteries. This algorithm included an agent-based model and robust optimisation technique. The researchers also assessed the performance of the MG with regard to the cost of the power differences associated with RES generation and power load uncertainties.
The study proposed a two-level EMS for an isolated MG network segment comprising physical connectivity to ensure energy and data exchange. The EMS comprised an outer layer that catered to information exchange and power support pertaining to the interconnects; simultaneously, the inner EMS layer provides power scheduling for every on-fault MG in the case of MG interconnection disruption. A stepped demand response program (DRP) is formulated and integrated with the energy management framework to optimise MG operation. Furthermore, the MILP notation was used to express the issue in the form of a stochastic optimisation expression to facilitate swift responses and a globally optimal outcome. The implementation comprised a five-MG-based distribution setup implementing the optimisation function. Simulation outcomes suggested that the suggested technique enhances MG performance and facilitates operational cost reduction [79].

4.1.8. Energy Management Based on Model Predictive Control (MPC) Methods

A robust model predictive control (RMPC)-based EMS algorithm was proposed in [80] for MG systems that included WTs, solar PVs, loads, and battery banks to manage the energy output from RESs and energy loads. The proposed EMS helped in minimising the integrated economic operational costs. It was combined with mixed integer programming. It was noted that the proposed RMPC technique made the MG management operations more reliable and also minimised the system operational costs.
In [81], the researchers developed a novel stochastic MPC-based EMS algorithm for controlling the MG that was composed of diesel and fuel cell generation, RESs, and an ESS. The main objective function of the novel model was to minimise the cost of energy demand and unit generation. The researchers also used the Monte Carlo simulation technique for predicting the PV, wind, load, and electricity costs. The simulation results indicated that their proposed stochastic technique displayed minimal operational costs.
Another EMS was proposed that was based on a two-stage predictive technique for a hybrid interconnected MG system composed of PVs and wind as RESs, along with ESSs (battery and ultracapacitor). The researchers also considered the costs of the battery and the ultracapacitor in addition to the discharge depth. They modelled the long-term costs and converted them to short-term costs related to real-time operations. The results indicated that the upper-stage EMS minimised the operational costs while the lower-stage EMS decreased the fluctuations between the MG and main grid [82].
In [83], the researchers developed and proposed a multi-step predictive optimal control model that was operated over 3 h, with 15 min steps for the islanded MG that included traditional and renewable energy sources, loads, and an ESS. The researchers included a cost function that considered the costs associated with the fuel consumption, battery SOC, RES reduction, and load-shedding quantity. The simulation results of the model indicated that their proposed algorithm displayed an optimal performance when allocated with the forecasting uncertainties.

4.1.9. Energy Management Based on Other Techniques

In [84], the researchers presented a novel optimisation system for the independent MG that included a battery bank and solar PV for determining the optimal economic system. They considered different control strategies for the EMS. Furthermore, they also determined the lifetime and longevity of the batteries by implementing an electrochemistry-based advanced model. The results indicated that this proposed optimisation technique helped in minimising the energy cost levels by 9.7% and also increased the battery service period by 48.6%. Thus, this model was seen to be more efficient compared to the baseline techniques.
In another study, the authors used two different techniques for optimising and designing an MG system which included turbine generation, PVs, and a battery bank for minimising the emission and energy costs for the MG. Technique one included the MILP that could optimise the energy management whereas technique two was the probabilistic Markov model that was used for predicting the PV. The researchers presented a linear model in their design for assessing the life span of the batteries [85].
Another EMS was designed for hybrid MG systems which included the RES (PV and wind), battery bank, and a non-RES such as diesel generation. This MG system operated in two different modes, i.e., on-grid and off-grid. Hence, it contained a control mechanism in the inverter for transmitting between the main grid and the MG. The results indicated that this proposed algorithm offered efficient energy that was transferred to the battery along with the loads and grids. This design allowed the model to work at rates of up to 10% [86].
This study proposes using the DSM scheme for a smart grid, comprising active (prosumers) and conventional consumers. The scheme considers wind energy prediction uncertainty for calculations. The rolling horizon scheme is employed to have prosumers implementing the DSM system to optimise cost considering wind power uncertainties; game theory is used to implement the scheme. Real-world datasets used for mathematical simulations indicate that the proposed stochastic scheme is superior to the typically expected value scheme for better individual cost optimisation [87].
The present work presents a game-theory based approach for a distributed, optimal, and autonomous demand-side EMS for smart grid systems. The objective is to reduce energy costs and regulate overall residential power requirements for several consumers sharing a common source system. Simulation outcomes confirm that the suggested scheme reduces individual electricity cost, overall energy cost, and overall peak-to-average energy demand [88].
Figure 7 presents a summary of different EMS methods that were used for the MG and NG systems based on the abovementioned literature review.
Based on the literature review described above, by changing non-linear functions into linear functions in models, power optimisation can be transferred via the MILP technique into mixed integer programming. For the optimisation model, MILP considers integer variables. Through the integration of integer variables, MILP could be used for the optimisation of the minimum operational cost pertaining to large power generators, including its stop–start cost related to the power system. Moreover, expression of the minimum operation power output pertaining to power generators can be done, which contributes to the lifespan of the generator. FLC possesses a quicker computational time versus MILP, but is associated with a relatively high cost. When the electricity pricing is dynamic, DP could be used to solve the EMS model. An NN’s key functionality is its useability for controlling and predicting the EMS. An NN can also learn complex models that are deemed difficult to be determined. An NN is employed for forecasting wind generation and solar generation as well as the load demand for MGs. However, the problem with using an NN algorithm is the requirement for training. MPC can be defined as a rolling process to repetitively solve the EMS optimisation model based on the updated forecasted data. MPC has been verified as a feasible method for numerous control issues with regard to uncertainty. Thus, applying the MILP algorithm in an EMS allows for reaping greater economic benefits.
Globally, large and small research groups have started taking an interest in EMSs for MG and NG systems. In the IEEE and Elsevier database, this can be observed via the keyword search (“microgrid” OR “nanogrid”) and (“energy management system”) as shown in Figure 8. Table 1 shows the summary of planning and optimisation practices used for strategic, tactical, and economic reasons with regard to EMSs.

5. Power Management Systems (PMSs)

Power management systems are used in MG and NG applications to constantly modify the DC bus voltage by balancing the demand and supply units through implementation of the ESS in the utility grids (in the case of grid-connected systems) [7].
For improving the MG operations, the PMS helps in controlling the real and reactive power flow. The primary objective of the PMS is to ensure output power from distributed generators is balanced with the demand for load power [89].
The PMS can be used to fulfil different objectives such as power factor correction, voltage support, and transient power support. The major electrical parameters used in the PMS are current, voltage, and power, which directly affect the operational conditions of the MG system.

5.1. Power Management System Techniques

PMS techniques are classified into two types, i.e., optimisation techniques and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. The PMS-based optimisation techniques generally involve a multi-objective function for maximising the efficiency of the MG, minimising fossil fuel consumption, and fulfilling the conditions of a successful operation [90]. On the other hand, the PMS-based AI techniques are used for real-time MG control. Furthermore, when the AI technique is used, the researchers do not understand the exact mathematical model for every DG in the MG.
Different algorithms based on the PMS optimisation and AI techniques were discussed to determine the optimal operation for assessing the reliability of the MG supply system and offering stability and resilience to it [91]. The following subsections categorise and describe the various solutions and planning methodologies that are used for strategic and tactical purposes in the PMS.

5.1.1. Power Management Systems Based on Optimisation Techniques

In [92], the researchers proposed a two-stage real-time demand-side management solution for the MG system that consisted of a combined WT and PV potential (1.2 MW) with a load ≤1 MW. A novel MPC optimisation scheme was proposed for reducing the operational costs and ensuring the power balance under some unpredictable scenarios. For a short-time resolution that was based on the complicated optimisation process, the researchers calculated the real-time power allocation in line with the real-time errors associated with some unknown factors. The role played by the grid support was based on the stationary and mobile (EV) ESS, which could result in a storage space of up to 3 MWh. This could be managed using an internal pricing scheme for a permanent power balance and simultaneous cost minimisation. The researchers tested the adequacy of their proposed technique using detailed simulations in various MG case studies.
A real-time MPC-based PMS technique was also proposed for the grid-connected MG system that included WTs, solar PVs, and battery storage [93]. In this study, the researchers aimed to minimise the energy costs and maximise the life span of the batteries. The results of the study indicated that the proposed PMS scheme helped in decreasing the energy system costs and maximising the battery life span by 1.5 years.
Another optimal MPC-based PMS technique was proposed in [94] for the grid-connected MG systems that included PVs, fuel cells, an electrolyser, and batteries. The objective function of this technique was minimising the use of traditional energy sources, saving energy after using RESs, and quality and economic factors using HESSs. The results indicated that the algorithm allowed the smooth operation of the MG system, however, the life span of the ESDs was increased.
In [95], the researchers developed a real-time stochastic linear programming-based PMS technique for the hybrid MG system that included combined heat power (CHP) generation, 80 kW wind turbines, 180 kW microturbines, 200 kW boilers, and 100 kW solar PV generators. The algorithm proposed in this study helped in minimising the emissions, overall costs, and demand payments. The total MG costs were highlighted as the function of maintenance, operating, and constant costs on the generation side, while on the demand side, they were the function of critical, thermal, and normal load costs. For maintaining the load balance and discouraging any curtailment, the researchers followed the load-related restrictions for every time interval. They could achieve an 11% cost saving when they implemented a deterministic strategy, whereas the emissions were decreased by 1.5%; however, no variations were noted in the demand prices.
In [96], the researchers proposed a Lyapunov optimisation-based PMS technique for the grid-connected MG system that included RESs and an ESS. This algorithm enabled the minimisation of operational costs of the MG and maintained the outage possibility for quality usage. Furthermore, quality of service (QoS) and energy storage were regarded as prime factors for resolving the optimisation issue. The results of the study indicated that this algorithm could minimise the energy storage costs by 60% and further improved the QoS.
Another simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA)-based PMS technique was presented for the residential MG system that included solar PVs and an HESS (mechanical flywheel and battery storage). The algorithm proposed in this study aimed to acquire a smooth battery power profile and decrease the grid energy exchange. The researchers used actual power records that were related to the demand and PV output to verify the proposed SPSA algorithm. They compared this algorithm to the deterministic power management scheme and noted that their SPSA approach showed a higher success rate (99% of the time) and could preserve the instantaneous current variance that was allocated to the battery at values below 1 A. It also improved the independence of the MG resources by enhancing the utilisation of the hybrid ESS [97].
In [98], the researchers developed a dynamic PMS technique for the independent hybrid AC/DC MG system that consisted of fuel cells, battery banks, PVs, and an ultracapacitor. It was seen that this PMS generated a real-time reference to the converter current controller that was associated with battery banks, fuel cells, and an ultracapacitor with the help of the moving average filter. The efficiency of the moving average filter was noted in the experimental results and simulations. The mean current reference was divided into the fuel cells and battery banks when it efficiently transmitted the oscillatory and transient demand devices to an ultracapacitor.

5.1.2. Power Management Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques

A novel fuzzy logic-based PMS technique was presented for the remote MG system that included wind, PV, and diesel generators. The main objective of this technique was to improve the reliability of the system, increase the RES integration, and enhance the reactive and active power performance of the MG system with the help of AI algorithms. The researchers assessed the performance of their proposed PMS technique with regard to the regulation of the active and reactive powers. For sharing a diesel generator based on the fuzzy logic for the active and reactive powers, the researchers proposed two simulation scenarios. The first scenario was based on the stepped solar irradiation and wind speed profiles, while scenario 2 was based on the solar irradiation and wind speed continuous profile. Results showed that this algorithm achieved better stability and reliability of the MG system. Furthermore, the active and reactive power control algorithm showed a faster response to various activities related to the remote MG, such as frequency and rapid voltage fluctuations related to the AC link system [99].
A novel multi-agent-based PMS was presented for the AC-MG system that included PV, wind, fuel cells, microturbines, and battery storage for ensuring a safe, efficient, economical, and reliable operation of the MG system. For stabilising the distributed devices, the researchers obtained the system information regarding the average frequency and voltage using an iterative consensus algorithm. They could acquire an optimal controller using a three-level control, where level one was responsible for tracking of the associated reference components. Level two helped in optimising the voltage and frequency references of droop control and further shared the reactive and active power based on the demand. Level three aimed for optimal scheduling. In this study, the researchers considered all factors such as emission pollution, fuel consumption, and operational maintenance [100].
In [101], the researchers proposed and implemented an artificial neural network (ANN)-based PMS technique for the standalone DC MG system that included a battery, supercapacitors, and PVs. The researchers aimed to control the DC bus voltage and manage the amount of power shared between the load and MG. They noted that this algorithm showed a better DC bus voltage regulation (2.83 V, it satisfied the general 5% allowed range), and improved power-sharing. Furthermore, all results could be experimentally verified using the hardware-in-loop (HIL) on the real-time simulator from OPAL-RT Technologies.
Another ANN-based PMS was proposed in [102] for the standalone MG that included batteries, PVs, and supercapacitors. The objective function of the study was to minimise stress on the battery storage and maximise its lifespan. A PV model can be used for validating and assessing the performance of the algorithm. The researchers noted that this technique improved the life span of the battery as it could decrease the dynamic stress and peak current. Additionally, it maximised the supercapacitor utilisation.
Another ANN-based PMS was proposed for an on-grid/off-grid MG that included wind, PV, fuel cells, an electrolyser, and battery storage. It was developed to manage the output of the fuel cell and an electrolyser was used for maintaining the charge of a battery within a constant range. The simulation results indicated that this algorithm displayed a fast response ability compared to the traditional techniques [103].
Globally, large and small research groups have started to take an interest in PMS for MG and NG systems. In the IEEE and Elsevier database, this can be observed via the keyword search (“microgrid” OR “nanogrid”) and (“power management system”) as shown in Figure 9. Table 2 shows the summary of planning and optimisation practices used for strategic, tactical, and economic reasons with regard to PMS.

6. Comparison between Energy Management Systems (EMSs) and Power Management Systems (PMSs) Based on Architecture and Control Strategies

The EMS and the PMS techniques used for the MG and NG systems have differing management tasks and time scales. In the case of the EMS, the major factors that need to be considered are operational costs, fuel costs, maintenance costs, MG device lifetimes, etc., while the major factors in the PMS include the voltage, current, and power, which can directly affect the operational conditions [7].
In the case of the islanded MG, the EMS played a vital role as it maintained the DC bus voltage, power quality, and constant energy feed to the load. On the other hand, in a grid-connected MG system, the EMS is supported by the main grid that feeds the load during any interruption that takes place in a DG. Furthermore, the PMS helps in optimising the dynamic response of the MG under various conditions of load. It can resolve several issues in the MG such as providing a smooth transition from islanded modes to grid-connected modes, and vice versa. This allows a maximal utilisation of the RES and improves the stability in the MG systems when some devices are connected/disconnected either from or into the system [104]. Figure 10 displays the construction of EMSs and PMSs for interconnected MGs.
Many researchers developed control strategies for managing the MG energy in the grid or island-connected modes. Table 3 presents a comparison between the EMS and PMS based on control techniques used for operational purposes.

7. Limitations and Challenges

Though the EMS and the PMS improve the efficiency of any system in a distribution scheme, they display some limitations such as power fluctuations between the MG and main grid due to the intermittency of the RES generation and the presence of stochastic loads that can negatively affect the reliability and stability of the power grids. Hence, a decrease in these power fluctuations was desirable. In order to achieve this, researchers needed to consider many things during the development of an EMS, including state of charge, losses of power in the storage devices, response times, and power prediction of the DG.
Power management was the main principle involved in the continuous adjustment of the DC bus voltage. This continuous adjustment can be achieved by controlling the power consumption and power generation units using an efficient ESS and the utility grid (when it is grid connected). However, the stability and flexibility of the MG-PMS are still lacking. Additionally, the regulation of DC bus voltage, current, and power-sharing amongst the MG and NG systems require further investigation.
Though a few research studies have developed strategies for regulating CO2 emissions, a huge gap exists between energy efficiency and energy objectives. Thus, for minimising CO2 emissions and improving sustainable economic growth, efficient and workable mitigation strategies must be developed.
The stochastic nature pertaining to the installed RES generators needs to be managed via optimisation methods by guaranteeing that a reliable supply of power is maintained for the consumers while also maintaining acceptable operation conditions for the electricity bill, storage system, and occupants’ comfort. Thus, selecting the EMS and PMS methods is crucial to maintain stable and reliable operation for NG and MG systems. A PMS and/or EMS can be chosen based on the properties of the deployed system (e.g., operation modes, topologies, and structure). However, deploying an approach does not necessarily denote that the others are deemed to be unreliable. The main issue for the studied constraints as well as the fixed objective pertaining to the control strategy would be to identify the utility with regard to the deployed method.
Furthermore, there needs to be an EMS control strategy that accounts for the maximisation of the battery life cycle as well as electricity price variation. These two issues enable maximising the system profitability by reducing the electricity bill and remove the need to replace the battery storage frequently in the NG and MG systems. The key idea here is to create a predictive and intelligent control strategy that allows for controlling the distributed resources optimally in the NG and MG systems by taking into account multiple constraints and objective functions simultaneously.

8. Conclusions

In general, this review defines the NG and MG configurations along with RESs such as wind and PV and ESDs such as batteries and ultracapacitors. Moreover, the researchers have given an elaborate review regarding the recently published studies focused on EMS and PMS applications in MG and NG systems. Moreover, the review stressed planning and optimisation methodologies employed for economic, strategic, and tactical purposes. The selection of these methodologies was carried out by considering their reliability, practicality, and resource availability with regard to the NG and MG environments. Additionally, they have presented an overview of recent EMS and PMS techniques based on the control objectives such as distributed, centralised, decentralised, and hierarchical strategies. They also highlighted the major differences between the EMS and PMS approaches. The EMS in the MG and NG system deals with economic objectives such as minimisation of the system operational costs including emission costs, fuel costs, battery degradation costs, etc., to increase the life span of MG devices. On the other hand, the PMS tackles technical objectives such as improving the flexibility, stability, reliability, and quality of MG and NG applications. Lastly, all limitations, contributions, and challenges affecting this research topic have been discussed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, S.J. and N.M.L.T.; resources, S.J. and N.M.L.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.J. and N.M.L.T.; writing—review and editing, S.J., N.M.L.T. and J.P.; supervision, N.M.L.T. and J.P.; project administration, N.M.L.T.; funding acquisition, N.M.L.T. and J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received from University Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia, BOLD research grant 2020 (BOLD 2020), project code: RJO10517844/110 and (BOLD 2021), project code: J510050002/2021080. The APC was funded by J510050002-BOLDRefresh2025-Centre of Excellence.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adekola, O.I.; Raji, A.K. Functionalities of smart inverter system for grid-connected applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on the Industrial and Commercial Use of Energy (ICUE), Cape Town, South Africa, 18–19 August 2015; pp. 340–344. [Google Scholar]
  2. Del Granado, P.C.; Wallace, S.W.; Pang, Z. The value of electricity storage in domestic homes: A smart grid perspective. Energy Syst. 2014, 5, 211–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, K.; Li, J.; He, Z.; Yan, W. Microgrid energy dispatching for industrial zones with renewable generations and electric vehicles via stochastic optimization and learning. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2018, 501, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Del Granado, P.C.; Pang, Z.; Wallace, S.W. Synergy of smart grids and hybrid distributed generation on the value of energy storage. Appl. Energy 2016, 170, 476–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Iris, Ç.; Lam, J.S.L. A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 112, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Young, B.; Ertugrul, N.; Chew, H.G. Overview of optimal energy management for nanogrids (end-users with renewables and storage). In Proceedings of the 2016 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 25–28 September 2016; pp. 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kumar, J.; Agarwal, A.; Agarwal, V. A review on overall control of DC microgrids. J. Energy Storage 2019, 21, 113–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Palensky, P.; Dietrich, D. Demand Side Management: Demand Response, Intelligent Energy Systems, and Smart Loads. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2011, 7, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Farrokhabadi, M.; Canizares, C.A.; Simpson-Porco, J.W.; Nasr, E.; Fan, L.; Mendoza-Araya, P.A.; Tonkoski, R.; Tamrakar, U.; Hatziargyriou, N.D.; Lagos, D.; et al. Microgrid Stability Definitions, Analysis, and Examples. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2020, 35, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hirsch, A.; Parag, Y.; Guerrero, J. Microgrids: A review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Burmester, D.; Rayudu, R.; Seah, W.; Akinyele, D. A review of nanogrid topologies and technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 760–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jurasz, J.; Canales, F.; Kies, A.; Guezgouz, M.; Beluco, A. A review on the complementarity of renewable energy sources: Concept, metrics, application and future research directions. Sol. Energy 2020, 195, 703–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fathima, A.H.; Palanisamy, K. Optimization in microgrids with hybrid energy systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 431–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Polman, A.; Knight, M.; Garnett, E.; Ehrler, B.; Sinke, W.C. Photovoltaic materials: Present efficiencies and future challenges. Science 2016, 352, aad4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kim, K.A.; Xu, C.; Jin, L.; Krein, P.T. A Dynamic Photovoltaic Model Incorporating Capacitive and Reverse-Bias Characteristics. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2013, 3, 1334–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Janzen, D.E.; Mann, K.R. Heteroleptic platinum(ii) isocyanide complexes: Convenient synthetic access, polymorphs, and vapoluminescence. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 4223–4237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, Z.; Matveev, A.; Ovrebø, S.; Nilssen, R.; Nysveen, A. State of the art in generator technology for offshore wind energy conversion systems. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC), Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 15–18 May 2011; pp. 1131–1136. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jung, C.; Schindler, D. Wind speed distribution selection—A review of recent development and progress. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 114, 109290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Díaz-González, F.; Sumper, A.; Gomis-Bellmunt, O.; Bianchi, F.D. Energy management of flywheel-based energy storage device for wind power smoothing. Appl. Energy 2013, 110, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sinha, S.; Chandel, S. Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for solar photovoltaic–wind based hybrid energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 755–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McKeon, B.B.; Furukawa, J.; Fenstermacher, S. Advanced Lead–Acid Batteries and the Development of Grid-Scale Energy Storage Systems. Proc. IEEE 2014, 102, 951–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Horiba, T. Lithium-ion battery systems. Proc. IEEE 2014, 102, 939–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mandic, G.; Nasiri, A. Modeling and simulation of a wind turbine system with ultracapacitors for short-term power smoothing. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Bari, Italy, 4–7 July 2010; pp. 2431–2436. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sivakkumar, S.; Pandolfo, A. Evaluation of lithium-ion capacitors assembled with pre-lithiated graphite anode and activated carbon cathode. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 65, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Manla, E.; Mandic, G.; Nasiri, A. Testing and modeling of lithium-ion ultracapacitors. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), a Clean Energy Future, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 17–22 September 2011; pp. 2957–2962. [Google Scholar]
  26. Muzaffar, A.; Ahamed, M.B.; Deshmukh, K.; Thirumalai, J. A review on recent advances in hybrid supercapacitors: Design, fabrication and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 101, 123–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thakar, S.; Vijay, A.S.; Doolla, S. System reconfiguration in microgrids. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2019, 17, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thakar, S.; Vijay, A.S.; Doolla, S. Effect of P-Q Limits on Microgrid Reconfiguration: A Capability Curve Perspective. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2019, 11, 2040–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gazijahani, F.S.; Salehi, J. Integrated DR and reconfiguration scheduling for optimal operation of microgrids using Hong’s point estimate method. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 99, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sedighizadeh, M.; Shaghaghi-shahr, G.; Aghamohammadi, M.R.; Esmaili, M. A new optimal operation framework for bal-anced microgrids considering reconfiguration and generation scheduling simultaneously. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2020, 30, e12302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hemmati, M.; Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B.; Ghasemzadeh, S.; Reihani, E.; Hemmati, M.; Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B.; Ghasemzadeh, S.; Reihani, E. Risk-based optimal scheduling of reconfigurable smart renewable energy based microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 101, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sedighizadeh, M.; Doyran, R.V.; Rezazadeh, A. Optimal simultaneous allocation of passive filters and distributed generations as well as feeder reconfiguration to improve power quality and reliability in microgrids. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 265, 121629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pathan, M.I.; Al-Muhaini, M.; Djokic, S.Z. Optimal reconfiguration and supply restoration of distribution networks with hybrid microgrids. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2020, 187, 106458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hemmatpour, M.H.; Mohammadian, M.; Gharaveisi, A.A. Optimum islanded microgrid reconfiguration based on maxi-mization of system loadability and minimization of power losses. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2016, 78, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Helmi, A.M.; Carli, R.; Dotoli, M.; Ramadan, H.S. Efficient and Sustainable Reconfiguration of Distribution Networks via Metaheuristic Optimization. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2021, PP, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Duong, L.T.; Truong, V.A. An effective method to solve the problem of electric distribution network reconfiguration considering distributed generations for energy loss reduction. Neural Comput. Appl. 2021, 33, 1625–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meliani, M.; El Barkany, A.; El Abbassi, I.; Darcherif, A.M.; Mahmoudi, M. Energy management in the smart grid: State-of-the-art and future trends. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2021, 13, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kamel, A.A.; Rezk, H.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Enhancing the operation of fuel cell-photovoltaic-battery-supercapacitor re-newable system through a hybrid energy management strategy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 20800–20807. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hussain, A.; Bui, V.H.; Kim, H.M. A Resilient and Privacy-Preserving Energy Management Strategy for Networked Mi-crogrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 9, 2127–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nge, C.L.; Ranaweera, I.U.; Midtgård, O.-M.; Norum, L. A real-time energy management system for smart grid integrated photovoltaic generation with battery storage. Renew. Energy 2019, 130, 774–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Krishnamoorthy, R.; Shanbaga Priya, L.; Aswini, S.; Guna, C. Design and Implementation of IoT based Energy Management System with Data Acquisition. In Proceedings of the 2020 7th International Conference on Smart Structures and Systems (ICSSS), Chennai, India, 23–24 July 2020; pp. 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  42. Alhasan, A.; Audah, L.; Alwan, M.H.; Alobaidi, O.R. An energy aware qos trust model for energy consumption enhancement based on clusters for iot networks. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2021, 16, 968–987. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hosseini, S.M.; Carli, R.; Dotoli, M. A Residential Demand-Side Management Strategy under Nonlinear Pricing Based on Robust Model Predictive Control. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), Bari, Italy, 6–9 October 2019; pp. 3243–3248. [Google Scholar]
  44. Khan, A.A.; Naeem, M.; Iqbal, M.; Qaisar, S.; Anpalagan, A. A compendium of optimization objectives, constraints, tools and algorithms for energy management in microgrids. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 1664–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Helal, S.A.; Hanna, M.; Najee, R.J.; Shaaban, M.; Osman, A.H.; Hassan, M.S. Energy Management System for Smart Hybrid AC/DC Microgrids in Remote Communities. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 2019, 47, 1012–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mosa, M.A.; Ali, A. Energy management system of low voltage dc microgrid using mixed-integer nonlinear programing and a global optimization technique. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2021, 192, 106971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ban, M.; Shahidehpour, M.; Yu, J.; Li, Z. A Cyber-Physical Energy Management System for Optimal Sizing and Operation of Networked Nanogrids with Battery Swapping Stations. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2017, 10, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Iris, Ç; Lam, J.S.L. Optimal energy management and operations planning in seaports with smart grid while harnessing renewable energy under uncertainty. Omega 2021, 103, 102445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zia, M.F.; Elbouchikhi, E.; Benbouzid, M. Optimal operational planning of scalable DC microgrid with demand response, islanding, and battery degradation cost considerations. Appl. Energy 2019, 237, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vera, Y.E.G.; Dufo-López, R.; Bernal-Agustín, J.L. Energy Management in Microgrids with Renewable Energy Sources: A Literature Review. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Almada, J.; Leão, R.; Sampaio, R.; Barroso, G. A centralized and heuristic approach for energy management of an AC microgrid. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 60, 1396–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhuo, W. Microgrid energy management strategy with battery energy storage system and approximate dynamic pro-gramming. In Proceedings of the 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Wuhan, China, 25–27 July 2018; pp. 7581–7587. [Google Scholar]
  53. Salazar, A.; Berzoy, A.; Song, W.; Velni, J.M. Energy Management of Islanded Nanogrids Through Nonlinear Optimization Using Stochastic Dynamic Programming. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2020, 56, 2129–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sheng, S.; Li, P.; Tsu, C.; Lehman, B. Optimal power flow management in a photovoltaic nanogrid with batteries. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Montreal, QC, Canada, 20–24 September 2015; pp. 4222–4228. [Google Scholar]
  55. Luu, N.A.; Tran, Q.T. Optimal energy management for grid connected microgrid by using dynamic programming method. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Denver, CO, USA, 26–30 July 2015; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chalise, S.; Sternhagen, J.; Hansen, T.M.; Tonkoski, R. Energy management of remote microgrids considering battery lifetime. Electr. J. 2016, 29, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hannan, M.A.; Abdolrasol, M.G.M.; Faisal, M.; Ker, P.J.; Begum, R.A.; Hussain, A. Binary Particle Swarm Optimization for Scheduling MG Integrated Virtual Power Plant Toward Energy Saving. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 107937–107951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abedini, M.; Moradi, M.H.; Hosseinian, S.M. Optimal management of microgrids including renewable energy sources using GPSO-GM algorithm. Renew. Energy 2016, 90, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Marzband, M.; Azarinejadian, F.; Savaghebi, M.; Guerrero, J.M. An optimal energy management system for islanded mi-crogrids based on multiperiod artificial bee colony combined with markov chain. IEEE Syst. J. 2017, 11, 1712–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ei-Bidairi, K.S.; Nguyen, H.D.; Jayasinghe, S.D.G.; Mahmoud, T.S. Multiobjective Intelligent Energy Management Optimization for Grid-Connected Microgrids. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Palermo, Italy, 12–15 June 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kumar, K.P.; Saravanan, B. Day ahead scheduling of generation and storage in a microgrid considering demand Side man-agement. J. Energy Storage 2019, 21, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Raju, L.; Morais, A.A.; Rathnakumar, R.; Soundaryaa, P.; Thavam, L.D. Micro-grid Grid Outage Management using Multi Agent Systems. Energy Procedia 2017, 117, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bogaraj, T.; Kanakaraj, J. Intelligent energy management control for independent microgrid. Sadhana 2016, 41, 755–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Karavas, C.-S.; Kyriakarakos, G.; Arvanitis, K.G.; Papadakis, G. A multi-agent decentralized energy management system based on distributed intelligence for the design and control of autonomous polygeneration microgrids. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 103, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mao, M.; Jin, P.; Hatziargyriou, N.D.; Chang, L. Multiagent-Based Hybrid Energy Management System for Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2014, 5, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Arcos-Aviles, D.; Pascual, J.; Guinjoan, F.; Marroyo, L.; Sanchis, P.; Marietta, M.P. Low complexity energy management strategy for grid profile smoothing of a residential grid-connected microgrid using generation and demand forecasting. Appl. Energy 2017, 205, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Saveen, G.; Prudhvi Raju, P.; Manikanta, D.V.; Satya Praveen, M. Design and implementation of energy management system with fuzzy control for multiple microgrid. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC), Coimbatore, India, 19–20 January 2018; pp. 1239–1244. [Google Scholar]
  68. Chaouachi, A.; Kamel, R.M.; Andoulsi, R.; Nagasaka, K. Multiobjective Intelligent Energy Management for a Microgrid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2013, 60, 1688–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, T.; He, X.; Deng, T. Neural networks for power management optimal strategy in hybrid microgrid. Neural Comput. Appl. 2019, 31, 2635–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Urias, M.E.G.; Sanchez, E.N.; Ricalde, L.J. Electrical Microgrid Optimization via a New Recurrent Neural Network. IEEE Syst. J. 2015, 9, 945–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ma, L.; Liu, N.; Zhang, J.; Tushar, W.; Yuen, C. Energy Management for Joint Operation of CHP and PV Prosumers inside a Grid-Connected Microgrid: A Game Theoretic Approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2016, 12, 1930–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lan, Y.; Guan, X.; Wu, J. Rollout strategies for real-time multi-energy scheduling in microgrid with storage system. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2016, 10, 688–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, X. Energy Management Strategy of PV Grid-Connected Household Nano-Grid System. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Atlanta, GA, USA, 4–8 August 2019; pp. 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  74. Jia, K.; Chen, Y.; Bi, T.; Lin, Y.; Thomas, D.; Sumner, M. Historical-Data-Based Energy Management in a Microgrid with a Hybrid Energy Storage System. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2017, 13, 2597–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Amrollahi, M.H.; Bathaee, S.M.T. Techno-economic optimization of hybrid photovoltaic/wind generation together with energy storage system in a stand-alone micro-grid subjected to demand response. Appl. Energy 2017, 202, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Su, W.; Wang, J.; Roh, J. Stochastic Energy Scheduling in Microgrids with Intermittent Renewable Energy Resources. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2013, 5, 1876–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, W.; Yurkovich, B.; Rizzoni, G. Energy Management Problems under Uncertainties for Grid-Connected Microgrids: A Chance Constrained Programming Approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2017, 8, 2585–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kuznetsova, E.; Li, Y.-F.; Ruiz, C.; Zio, E. An integrated framework of agent-based modelling and robust optimization for microgrid energy management. Appl. Energy 2014, 129, 70–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ahmadi, S.E.; Rezaei, N. A new isolated renewable based multi microgrid optimal energy management system considering uncertainty and demand response. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 118, 105760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, Y.; Fu, L.; Zhu, W.; Bao, X.; Liu, C. Robust model predictive control for optimal energy management of island mi-crogrids with uncertainties. Energy 2018, 164, 1229–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, Y.; Meng, F.; Wang, R.; Zhu, W.; Zeng, X.-J. A stochastic MPC based approach to integrated energy management in microgrids. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 41, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ju, C.; Wang, P.; Goel, L.; Xu, Y. A two-layer energy management system for microgrids with hybrid energy storage con-sidering degradation costs. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 9, 6047–6057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Oh, S.; Chae, S.; Neely, J.; Baek, J.; Cook, M. Efficient Model Predictive Control Strategies for Resource Management in an Islanded Microgrid. Energies 2017, 10, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Astaneh, M.; Roshandel, R.; Dufo-López, R.; Bernal-Agustín, J.L. A novel framework for optimization of size and control strategy of lithium-ion battery based off-grid renewable energy systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 175, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yan, B.; Luh, P.B.; Warner, G.; Zhang, P. Operation and Design Optimization of Microgrids With Renewables. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2017, 14, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Basaran, K.; Cetin, N.S.; Borekci, S. Energy management for on-grid and off-grid wind/PV and battery hybrid systems. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2017, 11, 642–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Scarabaggio, P.; Grammatico, S.; Carli, R.; Dotoli, M. Distributed Demand Side Management with Stochastic Wind Power Forecasting. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2021, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mohsenian-Rad, A.-H.; Wong, V.W.S.; Jatskevich, J.; Schober, R.; Leon-Garcia, A. Autonomous Demand-Side Management Based on Game-Theoretic Energy Consumption Scheduling for the Future Smart Grid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2010, 1, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Hosseinzadeh, M.; Salmasi, F.R. Robust Optimal Power Management System for a Hybrid AC/DC Micro-Grid. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2015, 6, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Olatomiwa, L.; Mekhilef, S.; Ismail, M.; Moghavvemi, M. Energy management strategies in hybrid renewable energy systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 62, 821–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ciupageanu, D.-A.; Barelli, L.; Lazaroiu, G. Real-time stochastic power management strategies in hybrid renewable energy systems: A review of key applications and perspectives. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2020, 187, 106497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; He, H.; Ren, S.; Weng, G. Real-Time Demand Side Management for a Microgrid Considering Uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 10, 3401–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hooshmand, A.; Asghari, B.; Sharma, R. A novel cost-aware multi-objective energy management method for microgrids. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA, 24–27 February 2013; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  94. Valverde, L.; Bordons, C.; Rosa, F. Power management using model predictive control in a hydrogen-based microgrid. In Proceedings of the IECON 2012-38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Montreal, QC, Canada, 25–28 October 2012; pp. 5669–5676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tabar, V.S.; Ghassemzadeh, S.; Tohidi, S. Energy management in hybrid microgrid with considering multiple power market and real time demand response. Energy 2019, 174, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Huang, Y.; Mao, S.; Nelms, R.M. Adaptive electricity scheduling in microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2014, 5, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Ciupageanu, D.A.; Barelli, L.; Ottaviano, A.; Pelosi, D.; Lazaroiu, G. Innovative power management of hybrid energy storage systems coupled to RES plants: The Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation approach. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT-Europe), Bucharest, Romania, 29 September–2 October 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  98. Sharma, R.K.; Mishra, S. Dynamic Power Management and Control of a PV PEM Fuel-Cell-Based Standalone ac/dc Microgrid Using Hybrid Energy Storage. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2017, 54, 526–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Belmokhtar, K.; Cano, M.H. Power Flow Management Algorithm for a Remote Microgrid Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques. In Book of the AI and Learning Systems; Industrial Applications and Future Directions: Gaspe, QC, Canada, 2020; pp. 175–197. [Google Scholar]
  100. Gao, Y.; Ai, Q. Distributed cooperative optimal control architecture for AC microgrid with renewable generation and storage. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 96, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Singh, P.; Lather, J.S. Artificial neural network-based dynamic power management of a DC microgrid: A hardware-in-loop real-time verification. Int. J. Ambient. Energy 2020, 43, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Faria, J.; Pombo, J.; Calado, M.D.R.; Mariano, S. Power Management Control Strategy Based on Artificial Neural Networks for Standalone PV Applications with a Hybrid Energy Storage System. Energies 2019, 12, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Yumurtaci, R. Role of Energy Management in Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems: Case Study Based Analysis Considering Varying Seasonal Conditions. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2013, 21, 1077–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Naidu, B.R.; Panda, G.; Siano, P. A self-reliant dc microgrid: Sizing control adaptive dynamic power management and ex-perimental analysis. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 3300–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chen, C.; Duan, S.; Cai, T.; Liu, B.; Hu, G. Smart energy management system for optimal microgrid economic operation. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2011, 5, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Torreglosa, J.P.; García-Triviño, P.; Fernández-Ramirez, L.M.; Jurado, F. Decentralized energy management strategy based on predictive controllers for a medium voltage direct current photovoltaic electric vehicle charging station. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 108, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xu, Q.; Xiao, J.; Hu, X.; Wang, P.; Lee, M.Y. A Decentralized Power Management Strategy for Hybrid Energy Storage System with Autonomous Bus Voltage Restoration and State-of-Charge Recovery. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2017, 64, 7098–7108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Dam, D.-H.; Lee, H.-H. A Power Distributed Control Method for Proportional Load Power Sharing and Bus Voltage Restoration in a DC Microgrid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 3616–3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Boudoudouh, S.; Maâroufi, M. Multi agent system solution to microgrid implementation. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 39, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Xiao, J.; Wang, P.; Setyawan, L. Multilevel Energy Management System for Hybridization of Energy Storages in DC Mi-crogrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2016, 7, 847–856. [Google Scholar]
  111. Oliveira, T.; Silva, W.W.A.G.; Donoso-Garcia, P.F. Distributed Secondary Level Control for Energy Storage Management in DC Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2017, 8, 2597–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microgrid connected to the grid composed of multiple nanogrids.
Figure 1. Microgrid connected to the grid composed of multiple nanogrids.
Sustainability 13 10331 g001
Figure 2. Block diagram of grid-connected nanogrid.
Figure 2. Block diagram of grid-connected nanogrid.
Sustainability 13 10331 g002
Figure 3. Basic structure of PV cell.
Figure 3. Basic structure of PV cell.
Sustainability 13 10331 g003
Figure 4. Power conversion stages of a wind turbine.
Figure 4. Power conversion stages of a wind turbine.
Sustainability 13 10331 g004
Figure 5. Battery equivalent circuit.
Figure 5. Battery equivalent circuit.
Sustainability 13 10331 g005
Figure 6. Ultracapacitor equivalent circuit model.
Figure 6. Ultracapacitor equivalent circuit model.
Sustainability 13 10331 g006
Figure 7. Energy management system techniques for MG and NG.
Figure 7. Energy management system techniques for MG and NG.
Sustainability 13 10331 g007
Figure 8. Number of EMS for MG and NG papers published.
Figure 8. Number of EMS for MG and NG papers published.
Sustainability 13 10331 g008
Figure 9. Number of PMS for MG and NG papers published.
Figure 9. Number of PMS for MG and NG papers published.
Sustainability 13 10331 g009
Figure 10. EMS and PMS architecture for interconnected MG.
Figure 10. EMS and PMS architecture for interconnected MG.
Sustainability 13 10331 g010
Table 1. Planning and optimisation practices with regard to energy management system.
Table 1. Planning and optimisation practices with regard to energy management system.
ReferencesCompositionTechniquesObjectivesYear
[45]PV and diesel generatorMINLPTo decrease the daily operational costs2019
[46]PV, diesel generators, wind, fuel cells, microturbines, and batteryMINLPTo minimise the generation costs and amount of emissions2021
[47]PV and batteryMILPTo maximise the life span of the battery and minimise the operational costs 2019
[48]PV and batteryMILPTo minimise the overall operational cost2021
[49]PV and batteryNon-linear ProgrammingTo minimise the overall operational cost2019
[51]PV, fuel cell, and batteryRule-BasedTo maximise the life span of the battery2016
[52]Wind and batteriesDynamic ProgrammingTo increase the selling benefits of wind energy and minimise the costs of fulfilling the load demands in the MG2018
[53]PV, fuel cell, and batteryStochastic Dynamic ProgrammingTo minimise the overall operational cost2020
[54]PV, battery, and diesel generationDynamic ProgrammingTo increase the PV energy utilisation and decrease fuel consumption 2015
[55]PV, battery, and diesel generationDynamic ProgrammingTo minimise CO2 emission costs and operational costs2015
[56]PV, battery, and diesel generationGenetic AlgorithmTo maximise the life span of the battery and minimise the operational costs2016
[57]PV, wind, fuel cell, battery, and diesel generationBPSOTo minimise the grid energy consumption, minimise CO2 emission amount, and minimise the overall operational cost 2019
[58]PV, wind, battery, and diesel generationPSOTo minimise fuel costs and system capital costs2016
[59]PV, wind, diesel generator, and batteryArtificial Bee ColonyTo decrease the energy costs2017
[60]PV, wind, microturbine, fuel cell, and batteryGrey WolfTo minimise the emission of fuel sources and the operational costs of MG2018
[61]PV, wind, microturbine, and batteryArtificial Fish SwarmTo maximise the utilisation of renewable and non-renewable energy generation as well as better charge and discharge activities of the battery2018
[62]PV, wind, and batteryMulti-agentTo decrease operational costs from PV intermittency and the stochastic nature of the critical load2017
[63]PV, wind, fuel cell, and batteryMulti-agentTo maintain the balance between the energy demand and supply2016
[64]PV, wind, diesel generator, electrolyser, batteries, and fuel cellsMulti-agentTo maximise the utilisation of renewable and non-renewable energy generation and minimise the overall operational cost 2015
[65]PV, wind, microturbine, fuel cell, and battery.Multi-agentTo minimise the overall operational cost2014
[66]PV, wind, and batteryFuzzy logicTo decrease the power fluctuations between the MG and main grids and increase the lifespan of the battery 2017
[67]PV, wind, fuel cell, and batteryFuzzy logicTo maximise the utilisation of renewable energy generation and maximise the lifespan of the battery2018
[68]PV, wind, fuel cell, microturbine, and batteryFuzzy logicTo minimise the CO2 emission and operational costs of the MG2013
[69]PV, wind, microturbine, diesel generator, fuel cell, and battery bankNeural NetworkTo minimise the overall MG costs in addition to the fuel costs, operational and maintenance costs, and the emission costs of the generator units2019
[70]PV, wind, batteries, and electrical carsNeural NetworkTo maximise the power supplied by PV and wind and minimise the power import from the utility grid2015
[71]PV and microturbineGame TheoryTo maximise the MG profit exclusively with the prosumers2016
[72]Heating and power generation, wind, and batteryRolling Horizon MarkovTo reduce the gas costs and minimise the electricity costs2016
[73]PV, battery, and ultracapacitorRolling OptimisationTo decrease the power fluctuations between the NG and main grids and to improve battery charging and discharging activity2019
[74]PV, wind, battery, and ultracapacitorAdaptive IntelligenceTo maximise the utilisation of renewable energy generation, reducing the load fluctuations, and managing the system power dispatch2017
[75]PV and windStochastic MethodTo minimise the energy losses in MG and operational costs in the RES2017
[76]PV, wind, diesel generator, PEV, and batteriesStochastic MethodTo minimise the traditional generator operational costs, decreasing the commercial costs matching the grid energy and increasing the battery lifespan2014
[77]PV, battery, and PEVStochastic MethodTo minimise the overall operational cost2017
[78]PV, wind, train station, and batteryRobust OptimisationTo minimise the overall operational cost2014
[79]PV, wind, and batteryStochastic MethodTo minimise the overall operational cost2019
[80]PV, wind, and battery bankRMPCTo minimise the integrated economic operational costs2018
[81]PV, wind, diesel generator, fuel cell, and batteryMPCTo minimise the cost of energy demand and unit generation2018
[82]PV, wind, battery, and ultracapacitorMPCTo minimise the operational costs and decrease the fluctuations between the MG and main grid2018
[83]PV, wind, diesel generator, and batteryMPCTo minimise the overall MG costs in addition to the fuel costs, operational and maintenance costs, and the emission costs of the generator units2017
[84]PV, and battery bankHierarchical MethodTo minimise the energy cost and maximise the lifespan of the battery 2018
[85]PV, turbine generation, and battery bankHierarchical MethodTo minimise the emission and energy costs for the MG2017
[86]PV, wind, diesel generator, and batteriesHierarchical MethodTo minimise the energy cost and maximise the lifespan of the battery2016
[87]WindGame TheoryTo optimise cost considering wind power uncertainties2021
[88]Smart gridGame TheoryTo reduce energy costs and regulate overall residential power requirements for several consumers sharing a common source system2010
Table 2. Planning and optimisation practices with regard to power management system.
Table 2. Planning and optimisation practices with regard to power management system.
ReferencesCompositionTechniquesObjectivesYear
[92]PV and windMPCTo reduce the operational costs and ensure the power balance2019
[93]PV, wind, and batteryMPCTo minimise the energy costs and maximise the life span of the battery2013
[94]PV, fuel cells, electrolyser, and batteriesMPCTo minimise the use of traditional energy sources, saving energy after using RES, quality and economic factors using HESS2012
[95]PV, wind, combined heat power generation, microturbines, and boilers Linear ProgrammingTo minimise the emissions, overall costs, and demand payments2019
[96]PV, wind, and batteryLyapunov OptimisationTo minimise the operational costs of the MG and maintain the outage possibility for quality usage2013
[97]PV, mechanical flywheel, and batterySimultaneous Perturbation Stochastic ApproximationTo acquire a smooth battery power profile and decrease the grid energy exchange2019
[98]PV, fuel cells, battery banks, and ultracapacitorDynamic ProgrammingTo control the DC bus voltage and manage the amount of power shared between the load and MG2018
[99]PV, wind, and diesel generator Fuzzy LogicTo improve the reliability of the system, and enhance the reactive and active power performance of the MG2016
[100]PV, wind, fuel cells, microturbines, and batteryMulti-agentTo ensure a safe, efficient, economical, and reliable operation of the MG system2017
[101]PV, batteries, and supercapacitorNeural NetworkTo control the DC bus voltage and manage the amount of power shared between the load and MG2020
[102]PV, batteries, and supercapacitorNeural NetworkTo minimise stress on the battery storage and maximise its lifespan2019
[103]PV, wind, fuel cells, electrolyser, and batteryNeural NetworkTo manage the output of the fuel cell and electrolyser to maintain the charge of a battery within a constant range2013
Table 3. A comparison between the EMS and PMS techniques based on control strategies.
Table 3. A comparison between the EMS and PMS techniques based on control strategies.
ReferencesStrategiesPower ManagementEnergy Management
[7,105]Centralised ControlBased on PMS a centralised controller, developed for optimising low-voltage distribution network. The optimisation was carried out for the interconnected operations to maximise power exchange using the major distribution grid and optimise the output power for the local distributed generations (DGs).A smart EMS (SEMS) for reducing the operational costs of MGs via optimal coordination of power production for DGs and ESSs. The researchers considered all economic and technical constraints for system development such as ESS management, power forecasting, economic load dispatch, and operational costs.
[106,107]Decentralised ControlA simple decentralised framework for addressing the issues related to HESSs in direct current MG, like a violation of SOC, efficient power break, and deviation of bus voltage. Power fluctuations are controlled. The supercapacitors tackle the high-frequency power fluctuations, while the batteries tackle the low-power fluctuations.A decentralised EMS for electric vehicle (EV) charging stations to control the flow of energy between the grid and MG. The DC bus voltage was a vital parameter for controlling the system. For maintaining the bus voltage at its reference value, the MPC is used for monitoring the SOC battery. The battery SOC presents the mode of PV operations, i.e., bus voltage sustaining mode, maximum power point tracking mode, or support of grid mode.
[108,109]Distributed ControlA power distributed control process was proposed for sharing the load power in proportion to the distributed source ratings. Based on the instant power of the DGs, a voltage shift was applied to the DC bus voltage to compensate the voltage loss because of the droop controller and maintain the stability of the DC bus voltage irrespective of any changes in the load.An EMS was developed for managing the HESS. The researchers proposed a new architecture based on the multi-agent system solution for applying important and sensitive loads.
[110,111]Hierarchical ControlA solid-state transformer (SST)-enabled hierarchical PMS. The researchers assigned three-level functions, i.e., DC bus voltage recovery, local control, and controlling the SOC of the battery for each level. The MG operates reliably in the independent mode by using a primary control. The SST is seamlessly transferred via the enabled mode through a secondary control.An EMS based on 2 level controls for the MG system composed of the ESS and PV was proposed. It aimed to manage the battery charging and discharging activities to prevent overcharging and discharging, and control SOC equalisation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jamal, S.; Tan, N.M.L.; Pasupuleti, J. A Review of Energy Management and Power Management Systems for Microgrid and Nanogrid Applications. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810331

AMA Style

Jamal S, Tan NML, Pasupuleti J. A Review of Energy Management and Power Management Systems for Microgrid and Nanogrid Applications. Sustainability. 2021; 13(18):10331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jamal, Saif, Nadia M. L. Tan, and Jagadeesh Pasupuleti. 2021. "A Review of Energy Management and Power Management Systems for Microgrid and Nanogrid Applications" Sustainability 13, no. 18: 10331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810331

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop