Brand Personality of Korean Dance and Sustainable Behavioral Intention of Global Consumers in Four Countries: Focusing on the Technological Acceptance Model
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- RQ1.
- What is the effect of the brand personality of Korean dance on its perceived ease of use and its perceived usefulness to global consumers?
- RQ2.
- What is the effect of the perceived ease of use on its perceived usefulness to global consumers?
- RQ3.
- What are the effects of the perceived ease of use and the perceived usefulness on the attitudes of global consumers?
- RQ4.
- What is the effect of the attitudes of global consumers on the sustainable behavioral intention to learn Korean dance among global consumers?
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Brand Personality and Korean Dance
2.2. Technology Acceptance Model
2.3. Attitude
2.4. Sustainable Behavioral Intention
3. Method
3.1. Research Model
3.2. Relationship between Key Variables
3.2.1. Brand Personality and Perceived Ease of Use/Usefulness
3.2.2. Perceived Ease of Use/Usefulness and Attitude
3.2.3. Attitude and Behavioral Intention
3.3. Variables
4. Results
4.1. Data Analysis
4.2. Respondents
4.3. Reliability and Validity
4.4. Correlation Analysis
4.5. Hypothesis Testing
4.6. Comparison of Nationalities of Global Consumers
5. Discussion
5.1. Summary of Research
5.2. Research Implications
5.2.1. Business Implications
5.2.2. Theoretical/Social Implications
5.3. Research Limitations and Future Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jung, G.M. A research the role of nation branding through the analysis of Korean traditional dances of National Dance Company of Korea. Off. J. Korean Soc. Dance Sci. 2017, 34, 59–71. [Google Scholar]
- Seo, H.J.; Park, S.H.; Lee, Y.J. The relationships among the Korean traditional culture awareness, Korean dance image, cultural heritage preservation, and the experience intention of Korean traditional dance of Korean adolescents. J. Korea Converg. Soc. 2020, 11, 317–328. [Google Scholar]
- Park, J.H.; Oh, Y.J.; Choi, J.M.; Min, Y.J. A study on establishing strategy to activate Korean traditional dancing art. J. Cult. Ind. Stud. 2016, 16, 117–127. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H.M.; Kim, K.R. The make up research of Korea traditional dance: Focusing on the folk dance. KSDC 2018, 24, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.K. Trend analysis of “Korean Dance” genre research. Korean J. Meas. Eval. Phys. Educ. Sports Sci. 2020, 22, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- De Mooij, M.; Hofstede, G. Convergence and divergence in consumer behavior: Implications for international retailing. J. Retailing 2002, 78, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mooij, M.D. Convergence and divergence in consumer behaviour: Implications for global advertising. Int. J. Advert. 2003, 22, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reisinger, Y.; Crotts, J.C. Applying Hofstede’s national culture measures in tourism research: Illuminating issues of divergence and convergence. J. Travel Res. 2010, 49, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwak, H.E.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Jung, J.E.; Choi, H.J. Korean dance performance influences on prospective tourist cultural products consumption and behaviour intention. J. Psychol. Afr. 2019, 29, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.W.; Kim, J.H. Brand loyalty and the Bangtan Sonyeondan (BTS) Korean dance: Global viewers’ perceptions. J. Psychol. Afr. 2020, 30, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, I.Y.; Choi, H.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Jung, S.H.; An, B.J.; Kim, J.H. Quality of Olympics opening ceremony: Tourism behavioural intention of international spectators. J. Psychol. Afr. 2019, 29, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.J.; Jung, S.H. Suggestions on the preventive elements of dementia in Korean dance: Focusing on the analysis of the relationship between dementia prevention behavior. Korean Soc. Sports Sci. 2020, 29, 901–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, W.J.; Jung, S.H.; Choi, H.J. A study on the effectiveness of dance program in life satisfaction: The moderating effect of social support. Product. Res. 2020, 38, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, J.Y. Imagination and expression of dance. Res. Dance Educ. 2015, 26, 45–63. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, B.K.; Won, Y.S.; Kim, S.Y. The effects of motivation to participate in Korean traditional dance on psychological happiness: Verification of mediating effect dance flow. Korean Soc. Sports Sci. 2020, 29, 757–773. [Google Scholar]
- Park, M.Y.; Park, S.Y.; Oh, Y.J. A study on breathing method in Pilates and Korean dance. J. Korean Soc. Philos. Sport Dance Martial Arts 2010, 18, 317–333. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, H.J.; Jung, S.H. A case study on participation in real-time contactless traditional Korean dance education as a bobby in the post-COVID-19 era: With a focus on the traditional Korean dance education company “Golden CATs”. J. Converging Sport Exer. Sci. 2020, 18, 297–304. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.K.; Kim, Y.J. The effect of service quality on satisfaction and intention of word-of-mouth in experiential tourism of Korean traditional culture. Int. Bus. Rev. 2019, 23, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, J.S.; Yeo, I.S.; Im, B.G.; Suh, K.B.; Won, D.Y. The effects of technology acceptance model(TAM) in sports field: A meta-analysis. Korean J. Sport Sci. 2017, 28, 81–90. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.Y.; Kim, D.Y.; Ryu, S.W. A study on the effect of selection attributes of contemporary dance performance on audience’s attitude and tickets purchase intention. J. Korea Contents Assoc. 2020, 20, 109–118. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y.J.; Seo, H.J. An analysis of the causal relationship among attitude on culture and arts, knowledge of Korean dance, demand of information about Korean dance and behavior intention. Korean J. Dance 2020, 20, 63–74. [Google Scholar]
- Abdullah, F.; Ward, R. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 56, 238–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adnyasuari, P.A.S.; Darma, G.S. Technology Acceptance Model and e-satisfaction in mobile banking. J. Manaj. Bisnis 2017, 14, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Akman, I.; Mishra, A. Sector diversity in green information technology practices: Technology acceptance model perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 49, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwee-Meier, S.T.; Bützler, J.E.; Schlick, C. Development and validation of a technology acceptance model for safety-enhancing, wearable locating systems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2016, 35, 394–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mortenson, M.J.; Vidgen, R. A computational literature review of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 1248–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elshafey, A.; Saar, C.C.; Aminudin, E.B.; Gheisari, M.; Usmani, A. Technology acceptance model for Augmented Reality and Building Information Modeling integration in the construction industry. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2020, 25, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rafique, H.; Almagrabi, A.O.; Shamim, A.; Anwar, F.; Bashir, A.K. Investigating the acceptance of mobile library applications with an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Comput. Educ. 2020, 145, 103732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, R.; Safa, L.; Ganjkhanloo, M.M. Understanding farmers’ ecological conservation behavior regarding the use of integrated pest management-an application of the technology acceptance model. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 22, e00941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, D.; Shao, F.; Wang, H.; Yan, M.; Qu, X. Integrating usability and social cognitive theories with the technology acceptance model to understand young users’ acceptance of a health information portal. Health Inform. J. 2020, 26, 1347–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moura, I.V.; de Almeida, L.B.; da Silva, W.V.; Veiga, C.P.D.; Costa, F. Predictor factors of intention to use technological resources: A multigroup study about the approach of technology acceptance model. Sage Open. 2020, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, E.S.; Park, M.S. Factors of the Technology Acceptance Model for construction IT. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, G.; Rojas-Méndez, J.I.; Whelan, S.; Mete, M.; Loo, T. Brand personality: Theory and dimensionality. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2018, 27, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freling, T.H.; Crosno, J.L.; Henard, D.H. Brand personality appeal: Conceptualization and empirical validation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2011, 39, 392–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grohmann, B. Gender dimensions of brand personality. J. Mark. Res. 2009, 46, 105–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.K.; Shim, S.W.; Dinnie, K. The dimensions of nation brand personality: A study of nine countries. Corp. Reput. Rev. 2013, 16, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garanti, Z.; Kissi, P.S. The effects of social media brand personality on brand loyalty in the Latvian banking industry. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2019, 37, 1480–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Yen, C.; Liu, T. Hotel brand personality and brand loyalty: An affective, conative and behavioral perspective. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2020, 29, 550–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sop, S.A.; Kozak, N. Effects of brand personality, self-congruity and functional congruity on hotel brand loyalty. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2019, 28, 926–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aaker, J.L. Dimensions of brand personality. J. Mark. Res. 1997, 34, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klink, R.R.; Athaide, G.A. Creating brand personality with brand names. Mark. Lett. 2012, 23, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maehle, N.; Supphellen, M. In search of the sources of brand personality. Int. J. Mark. Res. 2011, 53, 95–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, B.J.; Sekar, P.C. Measurement and validity of Jennifer Aaker’s brand personality scale for Colgate brand. Vikalpa 2008, 33, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Camarero, C.; Garrido, M.J.; Vicente, E. Components of art exhibition brand equity for internal and external visitors. Tour. Manag. 2010, 31, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camarero, C.; Garrido-Samaniego, M.J.; Vicente, E. Determinants of brand equity in cultural organizations: The case of an art exhibition. Serv. Ind. J. 2012, 32, 1527–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jawahar, D.; Vincent, V.Z.; Philip, A.V. Art-event image in city brand equity: Mediating role of city brand attachment. Int. J. Tour. Cities 2020, 6, 491–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, I.; Isar, Y.R.; Mar, P. Cultural diplomacy: Beyond the national interest? Int. J. Cult. Policy 2015, 21, 365–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Benzing, C.; Leach, E.; McGee, C. Sarbanes-Oxley and the new Form 990: Are arts and culture nonprofits ready? Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 2011, 40, 1132–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeWitt, D.; Alias, N.; Siraj, S.; Yaakub, M.Y.; Ayob, J.; Ishak, R. The potential of YouTube for teaching and learning in the performing arts. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 103, 1118–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grincheva, N. US arts and cultural diplomacy: Post-cold war decline and the twenty-first century debate. J. Arts Manag. Law Soc. 2010, 40, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, R. How small charities formulate marketing responses to major reductions in income: A study of nonprofit contemporary dance companies. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 2014, 17, 58–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gagliano, A.L. Digital media marketing for dance: Enhancing audience engagement with ballet companies and concert dance performance. U.F. J. Undergrad. Res. 2020, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snape, R. Continuity, change and performativity in leisure: English folk dance and modernity 1900–1939. Leis. Stud. 2009, 28, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaggelidou, E.; Tsamourtzis, E.; Malkogeorgos, A.; Zaggelidis, G. The effect of marketing on dance activity. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2013, 13, 220–230. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Y.S.; Kim, J.H. Performing arts and sustainable consumption: Influences of consumer perceived value on ballet performance audience loyalty. J. Psychol. Afr. 2021, 31, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Jung, S.H. Study on CEO characteristics for management of public art performance centers. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complexity 2015, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coelho, F.J.F.; Bairrada, C.M.; de Matos Coelho, A.F. Functional brand qualities and perceived value: The mediating role of brand experience and brand personality. Psychol. Mark. 2020, 37, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, X.; Su, J.; Xu, Y. Brand personality and its impact on brand trust and brand commitment: An empirical study of luxury fashion brands. Int. J. Fashion Des. Technol. Educ. 2018, 11, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marangunić, N.; Granić, A. Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2015, 14, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, P. Davis’ technology acceptance model (TAM)(1989). In Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption: Theories and Trends; Al-Suqri, M.N., Al-Aufi, A.S., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2015; pp. 205–219. [Google Scholar]
- Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46, 186–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ma, Y.J.; Gam, H.J.; Banning, J. Perceived ease of use and usefulness of sustainability labels on apparel products: Application of the technology acceptance model. Fashion Text. 2017, 4, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohk, K.; Park, S.B.; Hong, J.W. The influence of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, interactivity, and ease of navigation on satisfaction in mobile application. Adv. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2015, 84, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
- Tubaishat, A. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of electronic health records among nurses: Application of technology acceptance model. Inform. Health Soc. Care 2018, 43, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sánchez-Prieto, J.C.; Olmos-Migueláñez, S.; García-Peñalvo, F.J. MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 72, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.K. Integrating cognitive antecedents into TAM to explain mobile banking behavioral intention: A SEM-neural network modeling. Inf. Syst. Front. 2019, 21, 815–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, F.; Yang, R.J.; Ho, H.J.; Su, H.M. A TAM-based study of the attitude towards use intention of multimedia among school teachers. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2018, 1, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaur, S.; Lal, A.K.; Bedi, S.S. Do vendor cues influence purchase intention of online shoppers? An empirical study using SOR framework. J. Internet Com. 2017, 16, 343–363. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.N.; Jin, L.; Mao, H. Farmer cooperatives’ intention to adopt agricultural information technology – Mediating effects of attitude. Inf. Syst. Front. 2019, 21, 565–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.N.; Hu, C.; Lin, M.C.; Tsai, T.I.; Xiao, Q. Brand knowledge and non-financial brand performance in the green restaurants: Mediating effect of brand attitude. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 89, 102566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boca, G.D. Factors influencing consumer behavior in sustainable fruit and vegetable consumption in Maramures County, Romania. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.C.; Chen, C.W.; Tung, Y.C. Exploring the consumer behavior of intention to purchase green products in belt and road countries: An empirical analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jung, H.J.; Choi, Y.J.; Oh, K.W. Influencing factors of Chinese consumers’ purchase intention to sustainable apparel products: Exploring consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rana, J.; Paul, J. Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. J. Retailing Con. Serv. 2017, 38, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foroudi, P. Influence of brand signature, brand awareness, brand attitude, brand reputation on hotel industry’s brand performance. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 76, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramesh, K.; Saha, R.; Goswami, S.; Sekar, R.; Dahiya, R. Consumer’s response to CSR activities: Mediating role of brand image and brand attitude. Corp. Soc. Respons. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kudeshia, C.; Kumar, A. Social eWOM: Does it affect the brand attitude and purchase intention of brands? Manag. Res. Rev. 2017, 40, 310–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, J.; Back, K.J. Influence of brand relationship on customer attitude toward integrated resort brands: A cognitive, affective, and conative perspective. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2018, 35, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewing, D.L.; Monsen, J.J.; Kielblock, S. Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A critical review of published questionnaires. Educ. Psychol. Pract. 2018, 34, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loosemore, M.; Malouf, N. Safety training and positive safety attitude formation in the Australian construction industry. Saf. Sci. 2019, 113, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choe, J.Y.; Kim, S. Effects of tourists’ local food consumption value on attitude, food destination image, and behavioral intention. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 71, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, C.C.; Lu, A.C.C.; Huang, T.T. Drivers of consumers’ behavioral intention toward green hotels. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 1134–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeo, V.C.S.; Goh, S.K.; Rezaei, S. Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services. J. Retailing Con. Serv. 2017, 35, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qasim, H.; Yan, L.; Guo, R.; Saeed, A.; Ashraf, B.N. The defining role of environmental self-identity among consumption values and behavioral intention to consume organic food. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sharma, P.; Nayak, J.K. Testing the role of tourists’ emotional experiences in predicting destination image, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: A case of wellness tourism. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2018, 28, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.C.; Tsai, J.L. Determinants of behavioral intention to use the Personalized Location-based Mobile Tourism Application: An empirical study by integrating TAM with ISSM. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 96, 628–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, S.B.; Jang, Y.J.; Kim, W.G. The moderating role of severity of service failure in the relationship among regret/disappointment, dissatisfaction, and behavioral intention. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2017, 18, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez-Castillo, D.; Sánchez-Fernández, R. The role of digital influencers in brand recommendation: Examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 49, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, B.; Han, H. Working-holiday tourism attributes and satisfaction in forming word-of-mouth and revisit intentions: Impact of quantity and quality of intergroup contact. J. Destination Mark. Manag. 2018, 9, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, D.; Lee, G.; Kim, W.G.; Kim, T.T. Social network analysis as a valuable tool for understanding tourists’ multi-attraction travel behavioral intention to revisit and recommend. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, J.; Chan, T.L.; Pratt, S. Destination Image of Taiwan from the perspective of Hong Kong residents: Revisiting structural relationships between destination image attributes and behavioral intention. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Admin. 2018, 19, 289–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dean, D.; Suhartanto, D. The formation of visitor behavioral intention to creative tourism: The role of push–Pull motivation. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2019, 24, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, L.J.; Choi, H.C.; Joppe, M. Exploring the relationship between satisfaction, trust and switching intention, repurchase intention in the context of Airbnb. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 69, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- So, K.K.F.; Kim, H.; Oh, H. What makes Airbnb experiences enjoyable? The effects of environmental stimuli on perceived enjoyment and repurchase intention. J. Travel Res. 2021, 60, 1018–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, Y.W.; Kim, D.J. Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 39, 199–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W.H.; Cho, J.L.; Kim, K.S. The relationships of wine promotion, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention: The moderating roles of customers’ gender and age. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2019, 39, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Hwang, H.; Shim, C. Experiential festival attributes, perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intention for Korean festivalgoers. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2019, 19, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rather, R.A.; Tehseen, S.; Itoo, M.H.; Parrey, S.H. Customer brand identification, affective commitment, customer satisfaction, and brand trust as antecedents of customer behavioral intention of loyalty: An empirical study in the hospitality sector. J. Glob. Scholars Mark. Sci. 2019, 29, 196–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciasullo, M.V.; Maione, G.; Torre, C.; Troisi, O. What about sustainability? An empirical analysis of consumers’ purchasing behavior in fashion context. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sogari, G.; Pucci, T.; Aquilani, B.; Zanni, L. Millennial generation and environmental sustainability: The role of social media in the consumer purchasing behavior for wine. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Toussaint, M.; Cabanelas, P.; González-Alvarado, T.E. What about the consumer choice? The influence of social sustainability on consumer’s purchasing behavior in the Food Value Chain. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2021, 27, 100134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.J.C. From sustainability to customer loyalty: A case of full service hotels’ guests. J. Retailing Con. Serv. 2015, 22, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Andrade Silva, A.R.; Bioto, A.S.; Efraim, P.; de Castilho Queiroz, G. Impact of sustainability labeling in the perception of sensory quality and purchase intention of chocolate consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 141, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussin, A.; Ibrahim, F.W.; Jali, M.R.M. Green economy: Evaluation of Malaysian company environmental sustainability. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2017, 7, 139–143. [Google Scholar]
- Panda, T.K.; Kumar, A.; Jakhar, S.; Luthra, S.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Kazancoglu, I.; Nayak, S.S. Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.; Kim, Y.K. Proactive versus reactive apparel brands in sustainability: Influences on brand loyalty. J. Retailing Con. Serv. 2016, 29, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrini, F.; Tencati, A. Sustainability and stakeholder management: The need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2006, 15, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schultz, D.E.; Block, M.P. Beyond brand loyalty: Brand sustainability. J. Mark. Commun. 2015, 21, 340–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Guo, F.; Yu, F.; Liu, S. The effects of online shopping context cues on consumers’ purchase intention for cross-border e-commerce sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhou, L.; Tokos, H.; Krajnc, D.; Yang, Y. Sustainability performance evaluation in industry by composite sustainability index. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2012, 14, 789–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa Pinto, D.; Herter, M.M.; Rossi, P.; Borges, A. Going green for self or for others? Gender and identity salience effects on sustainable consumption. Int. J. Con. Stud. 2014, 38, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milfont, T.L.; Markowitz, E. Sustainable consumer behavior: A multilevel perspective. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2016, 10, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, D.C.; Nique, W.M.; da Silva Añaña, E.; Herter, M.M. Green consumer values: How do personal values influence environmentally responsible water consumption? Int. J. Con. Stud. 2011, 35, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indarsin, T.; Ali, H. Attitude toward Using m-commerce: The analysis of perceived usefulness perceived ease of use, and perceived trust: Case study in Ikens Wholesale Trade, Jakarta–Indonesia. Saudi J. Bus. Manag. Stud. 2017, 2, 995–1007. [Google Scholar]
- Hansen, J.M.; Saridakis, G.; Benson, V. Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers’ use of social media for transactions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 80, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raza, S.A.; Umer, A.; Shah, N. New determinants of ease of use and perceived usefulness for mobile banking adoption. Int. J. Electron. Customer Relat. Manag. 2017, 11, 44–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moslehpour, M.; Pham, V.K.; Wong, W.K.; Bilgiçli, İ. E-purchase intention of Taiwanese consumers: Sustainable mediation of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Sustainability 2018, 10, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thi Thu Nguyen, H.; Hung, R.J.; Lee, C.H.; Thi Thu Nguyen, H. Determinants of residents’ E-waste recycling behavioral intention: A case study from Vietnam. Sustainability 2019, 11, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Shi, Y.; Xu, F.; Soeung, B.; Sohail, M.T.; Rubakula, G.; Juma, S.A. The predictors of the behavioral intention to the use of urban green spaces: The perspectives of young residents in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Habitat Int. 2017, 64, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, D.; Malhotra, R.; Moharana, T.R. When fan engagement with sports club brands matters in sponsorship: Influence of fan–brand personality congruence. J. Brand Manag. 2020, 27, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priporas, C.V.; Stylos, N.; Kamenidou, I. City image, city brand personality and generation Z residents’ life satisfaction under economic crisis: Predictors of city-related social media engagement. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 119, 453–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Aklikokou, A.K. Determinants of e-government adoption: Testing the mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Int. J. Public Admin. 2020, 43, 850–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, P.; Prashar, S.; Vijay, T.S.; Parsad, C. Examining the influence of antecedents of continuous intention to use an informational app: The role of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 2021, 36, 270–287. [Google Scholar]
- Wicaksono, A.; Maharani, A. The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on the technology acceptance model to use online travel agency. J. Bus. Manag. 2020, 1, 313–328. [Google Scholar]
- Chawla, D.; Joshi, H. Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India–An empirical study. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2019, 37, 1590–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, H.Y.; Jung, S.H.; Yu, J.P.; Bae, K.H.; An, B.J.; Kim, J.H. Perceived tourist values of the Museum of African Art. J. Psychol. Afr. 2018, 28, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarei, G.; Asgarnezhad Nuri, B.; Noroozi, N. The effect of Internet service quality on consumers’ purchase behavior: The role of satisfaction, attitude, and purchase intention. J. Internet Com. 2019, 18, 197–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Kim, G.J.; Choi, H.J.; Seok, B.I.; Lee, N.H. Effects of social network services (SNS) subjective norms on SNS addiction. J. Psychol. Afr. 2019, 29, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Jung, S.H.; Ahn, J.C.; Kim, B.S.; Choi, H.J. Social networking sites self-image antecedents of social networking site addiction. J. Psychol. Afr. 2020, 30, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawar, N.; Lei, J. Brand crises: The roles of brand familiarity and crisis relevance in determining the impact on brand evaluations. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.S.; Zhou, L. Negative effects of brand familiarity and brand relevance on effectiveness of viral advertisements. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2016, 44, 1151–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsäßer, M.; Wirtz, B.W. Rational and emotional factors of customer satisfaction and brand loyalty in a business-to-business setting. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2017, 32, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, C.; Gillespie, B.; Otto, C. The impact of rational, emotional, and physiological advertising images on purchase intention: How TV ads influence brand memory. J. Advert. Res. 2019, 59, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cătălin, M.C.; Andreea, P. Brands as a mean of consumer self-expression and desired personal lifestyle. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 109, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chernev, A.; Hamilton, R.; Gal, D. Competing for consumer identity: Limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. J. Mark. 2011, 75, 66–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Phau, I.; Lau, K.C. Brand personality and consumer self-expression: Single or dual carriageway? J. Brand Manag. 2001, 8, 428–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Essamri, A.; McKechnie, S.; Winklhofer, H. Co-creating corporate brand identity with online brand communities: A managerial perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 96, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhonen, T.; Hirvonen, S.; Laukkanen, T. SME brand identity: Its components, and performance effects. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2017, 26, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Operational Definition | Measurement Items | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Brand Personality of Korean Dance | Consumer perception of its brand identity (e.g., sincerity, excitement, competence, sophistication, and ruggedness). | Korean dance—seems to be sincere (honest) and familiar. | Coelho et al. [57] Pradhan et al. [120] Priporas et al. [121] |
Korean dance—seems to be exciting and unique. | |||
Korean dance—seems to be competent and intelligent. | |||
Korean dance—seems to be sophisticated and attractive. | |||
Korean dance—seems to be rugged and extroverted. | |||
Perceived Ease of Use | Consumer perception of its ease of learning (i.e., Korean dance does not require much effort). | Korean dance—beginners can learn it easily and comfortably. | Chen and Aklikokou [122] Gupta et al. [123] Wicaksono and Maharani [124] |
Korean dance—beginners can learn it without difficulty. | |||
Korean dance—beginners can learn it with little effort. | |||
Korean dance—beginners can approach and learn it easily. | |||
Perceived Usefulness | Consumer perception of its beneficial effects (e.g., diet, posture, walking, muscle strength, flexibility, stress relief). | Korean dance—is helpful for diet, compared with other dances. | Chen and Aklikokou [122] Gupta et al. [123] Wicaksono and Maharani [124] |
Korean dance—is helpful for posture/walking correction, compared with other dances. | |||
Korean dance—is helpful for enhancing muscle strength/flexibility, compared with other dances. | |||
Korean dance—is helpful for stress relief, compared with other dances. | |||
Attitude | The positive consumer mindset toward Korean dance. | Korean dance—is more enjoyable than expected. | Chawla and Joshi [125] Meng et al. [126] Zarei et al. [127] |
Korean dance—is more captivating than expected. | |||
Korean dance—I am attached to it more than expected. | |||
Korean dance—I have more affection for it than expected. | |||
Korean dance—I have more positive feelings about it than expected. | |||
Behavioral Intention | The degree to which consumers want to learn and recommend Korean dance. | Korean dance—I will positively consider learning it. | Choi et al. [11] Kwak et al. [9] Meng et al. [126] |
Korean dance—I will recommend it to others. | |||
Korean dance—I will talk to others positively about learning it. | |||
Korean dance—I will choose to learn it over other dances. | |||
Korean dance—I am thinking of learning it in the future. |
Items | Frequency | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 326 | 50.2 |
Female | 323 | 49.8 | |
Age | 20s | 103 | 15.9 |
30s | 178 | 27.4 | |
40s | 179 | 27.6 | |
50s | 189 | 29.1 | |
Education | High school | 106 | 16.3 |
Technical college | 120 | 18.5 | |
University | 328 | 50.5 | |
Graduate school | 95 | 14.6 | |
Monthly income (personal) | KRW 2 million or less | 207 | 31.9 |
KRW 2.01 million–3 million | 133 | 20.5 | |
KRW 3.01 million–4 million | 100 | 15.4 | |
KRW 4.01 million–5 million | 81 | 12.5 | |
KRW 5.01 million or greater | 128 | 19.7 | |
Nationality | South Korea | 208 | 32.0 |
USA | 143 | 22.0 | |
UK | 139 | 21.4 | |
South Africa | 159 | 24.5 |
Variables | Items | Convergent Validity | Cronbach’s Alpha | Multi-Collinearity | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outer Loadings | Composite Reliability | AVE | VIF | |||
Brand personality | Brand personality 1 | 0.849 | 0.935 | 0.741 | 0.913 | 2.518 |
Brand personality 2 | 0.870 | 2.905 | ||||
Brand personality 3 | 0.876 | 2.886 | ||||
Brand personality 4 | 0.887 | 3.162 | ||||
Brand personality 5 | 0.821 | 2.102 | ||||
Perceived ease of use | Perceived ease of use 1 | 0.904 | 0.956 | 0.845 | 0.939 | 3.450 |
Perceived ease of use 2 | 0.938 | 4.783 | ||||
Perceived ease of use 3 | 0.937 | 4.668 | ||||
Perceived ease of use 4 | 0.898 | 3.052 | ||||
Perceived usefulness | Perceived usefulness 1 | 0.850 | 0.927 | 0.759 | 0.894 | 2.168 |
Perceived usefulness 2 | 0.887 | 2.751 | ||||
Perceived usefulness 3 | 0.878 | 2.641 | ||||
Perceived usefulness 4 | 0.870 | 2.423 | ||||
Attitude | Attitude 1 | 0.872 | 0.950 | 0.791 | 0.934 | 2.979 |
Attitude 2 | 0.878 | 3.061 | ||||
Attitude 3 | 0.893 | 3.336 | ||||
Attitude 4 | 0.905 | 4.237 | ||||
Attitude 5 | 0.899 | 3.766 | ||||
Sustainable behavioral intention | Sustainable behavioral intention 1 | 0.893 | 0.952 | 0.800 | 0.937 | 3.285 |
Sustainable behavioral intention 2 | 0.908 | 3.806 | ||||
Sustainable behavioral intention 3 | 0.883 | 3.107 | ||||
Sustainable behavioral intention 4 | 0.895 | 3.741 | ||||
Sustainable behavioral intention 5 | 0.892 | 3.660 |
Variable | Brand Personality | Perceived Ease of Use | Perceived Usefulness | Attitude | Sustainable Behavioral Intention |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brand personality | 0.861 | ||||
Perceived ease of use | 0.455 | 0.919 | |||
Perceived usefulness | 0.700 | 0.670 | 0.871 | ||
Attitude | 0.679 | 0.647 | 0.756 | 0.889 | |
Sustainable behavioral intention | 0.553 | 0.691 | 0.715 | 0.786 | 0.894 |
Path | β-Value | Sample Mean | Standard Deviation | t-Value | p-Value | Hypothesis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Brand personality | → | Perceived ease of use | 0.455 | 0.457 | 0.035 | 12.968 | 0.001 | Supported |
H2 | Brand personality | → | Perceived usefulness | 0.498 | 0.498 | 0.030 | 16.461 | 0.001 | Supported |
H3 | Perceived ease of use | → | Perceived usefulness | 0.444 | 0.445 | 0.029 | 15.059 | 0.001 | Supported |
H4 | Perceived ease of use | → | Attitude | 0.255 | 0.256 | 0.038 | 6.649 | 0.001 | Supported |
H5 | Perceived usefulness | → | Attitude | 0.585 | 0.584 | 0.037 | 15.860 | 0.001 | Supported |
H6 | Attitude | → | Sustainable behavioral intention | 0.786 | 0.788 | 0.018 | 44.337 | 0.001 | Supported |
Path | South Korea | USA | UK | South Africa | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | ||||
H1 | Brand personality | → | Perceived ease of use | 0.342 | 5.323 ** | 0.528 ** | 7.021 ** | 0.552 ** | 7.549 ** | 0.310 ** | 4.067 ** |
H2 | Brand personality | → | Perceived usefulness | 0.491 | 9.001 ** | 0.445 ** | 6.309 ** | 0.536 ** | 9.539 ** | 0.516 ** | 10.411 ** |
H3 | Perceived ease of use | → | Perceived usefulness | 0.405 | 8.122 ** | 0.538 ** | 9.416 ** | 0.428 ** | 7.086 ** | 0.414 ** | 6.922 ** |
H4 | Perceived ease of use | → | Attitude | 0.204 | 3.383 ** | 0.311 ** | 4.336 ** | 0.339 ** | 3.591 ** | 0.256 ** | 3.182 ** |
H5 | Perceived usefulness | → | Attitude | 0.596 | 9.666 ** | 0.625 | 8.340 ** | 0.480 ** | 5.387 ** | 0.571 ** | 7.169 ** |
H6 | Attitude | → | Sustainable behavioral intention | 0.695 | 17.629 ** | 0.850 ** | 27.591 ** | 0.828 ** | 25.635 ** | 0.743 ** | 17.910 ** |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jung, S.-h.; Kim, J.-h.; Cho, H.-n.; Lee, H.-w.; Choi, H.-j. Brand Personality of Korean Dance and Sustainable Behavioral Intention of Global Consumers in Four Countries: Focusing on the Technological Acceptance Model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011160
Jung S-h, Kim J-h, Cho H-n, Lee H-w, Choi H-j. Brand Personality of Korean Dance and Sustainable Behavioral Intention of Global Consumers in Four Countries: Focusing on the Technological Acceptance Model. Sustainability. 2021; 13(20):11160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011160
Chicago/Turabian StyleJung, Seung-hye, Joon-ho Kim, Ha-na Cho, Hae-won Lee, and Hyun-ju Choi. 2021. "Brand Personality of Korean Dance and Sustainable Behavioral Intention of Global Consumers in Four Countries: Focusing on the Technological Acceptance Model" Sustainability 13, no. 20: 11160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011160
APA StyleJung, S.-h., Kim, J.-h., Cho, H.-n., Lee, H.-w., & Choi, H.-j. (2021). Brand Personality of Korean Dance and Sustainable Behavioral Intention of Global Consumers in Four Countries: Focusing on the Technological Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 13(20), 11160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011160