Next Article in Journal
An Assessment of the Ecological Landscape Quality (ELQ) of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) Based on Existing Elements of Green and Blue Infrastructure (GBI)
Next Article in Special Issue
MgO-Based Board Materials for Dry Construction Are a Tool for More Sustainable Constructions—Literature Study and Thermal Analysis of Different Wall Compositions
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Sustainable Partnership Organizational Mechanism (POM): Case of Local Action Groups (LAG)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Examining the Asymmetric Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic and Global Financial Crisis on Dow Jones and Oil Price Shock
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Unlocking the Potential of Fintechs for Financial Inclusion: A Delphi-Based Approach

Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11675; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111675
by Luiz Antonio Joia 1,* and Joaquim Pedro Vasconcelos Cordeiro 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11675; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111675
Submission received: 10 September 2021 / Revised: 11 October 2021 / Accepted: 19 October 2021 / Published: 22 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Prerequisite for Sustainability: Financial Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I enjoyed your paper and believe it makes a very good contribution to current scholarship and policymaking in Brazil but also broader.

You may consider strengthening the advice in your conclusion by referencing the work of the GPFI as the G20 group on financial inclusion and by considering a few other key building blocks. I miss for example references to improved privacy and data protection in that discussion. Given the data intensiveness of financial technology this would be important to consider in the conclusion at least. Have a look at the work of Nicola Jentzsch relating to mobile money and later work of David Medine. If users do not trust the system, they may elect not to use the services.

It is also clear that fintech can only expand if the necessary digital identity infrastructure and regulations are in place. See for example FATF's 2020 Digital Identity guidance.

If you wish to exclude building blocks like these, I would suggest that you adopt a framework or lens that justifies their exclusion. Otherwise it may be easy to incorporate them under public policy.

Two small matters: The Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP) is typed as GCAP in a few places and Lyman's co-author is "de Koker".


 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer
Thanks for your comments.
In the attached file, we sent our response to them.
The Authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Plaese see attached Document 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer
Thanks for your comments.
In the attached file, we sent our response to them.
The Authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see my report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer
Thanks for your comments.
In the attached file, we sent our response to them.
The Authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

The paper deals with an interesting topic and, it is well structured and written. 

I suggest one clarification to give a better fluency in reading.

In section 5:

- How do you manage the situation when the drivers are related to more than one cluster? If more drivers are inserted in more clusters, couldn't the result be biased? Try to explain in avoid confusion. 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer
Thanks for your comments.
In the attached file, we sent our response to them.
The Authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see my report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Back to TopTop