Next Article in Journal
Destination Sustainability and Memorable Tourism Experiences
Next Article in Special Issue
Capturing Twitter Negativity Pre- vs. Mid-COVID-19 Pandemic: An LDA Application on London Public Transport System
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Approaches for Accelerated Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Public Transport during the Second COVID-19 Wave in Italy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

How COVID-19 Pandemic Affected Urban Trips? Structural Interpretive Model of Online Shopping and Passengers Trips during the Pandemic

Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11995; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111995
by Mostafa Ghodsi 1, Ali Ardestani 2, Arash Rasaizadi 1, Seyednaser Ghadamgahi 3 and Hao Yang 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11995; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111995
Submission received: 9 September 2021 / Revised: 10 October 2021 / Accepted: 26 October 2021 / Published: 29 October 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper's main contribution (and I quote) "... is to discover the relationship between passenger trips and shopping attitudes at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic."  It would be interesting if the authors could explain if and how their findings affected potential changes in the provision of transportation services during the pandemic.

Author Response

We appreciate your most fundamental comment about our research. More explanations about the effect of our findings on shopping trips and transportation services are added to the conclusion section.

Also, we have checked out manuscripts, and we have modified all the minor grammar issues.

Reviewer 2 Report

1.Abstract can be written in more comprehensive and focused manner. Abstract, summarize the numerical results of proposed work.

2.Detailed discussion should be included on parameter setting.

3.Contribution of the work should be specific and supported by the results. More critical result analysis is required to support the novelty of the work.

4.What is the evidence you provide to support your claim?

5.Quality of tables is so important too. Please provide some high-resolution figures. Some figures have a poor resolution.

6.The writing is not clear and presents many typos and grammatical problems, hence the whole paper needs to be proofread.

Author Response

Your valuable comments have been incorporated into the revised paper. Please find our detailed response in the attachment. In advance, we appreciate your valuable time and consideration.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see the attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The paper is revised based on your worthful comments. Attached please find our detailed response to your comments. In advance, we appreciate your valuable time and consideration.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop