Research on Industry Development Path Planning of Resource-Rich Regions in China from the Perspective of “Resources, Assets, Capital”
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. The Development Status of China’s Resource Industry
2.1. Resource Reserves and Environmental Constraints
2.2. The Impact of the Resource Industry on China’s Industrial Structure
2.3. The Development Status of China’s Resource-Rich Areas
3. Industrial Development Path Planning in Resource-Rich Regions
3.1. Planning Path Design
3.2. Method and Model
3.2.1. Industrial Relevance Measurement Based on Input-Output Analysis
3.2.2. Regional Industry Integrated Circular Economy System Based on “Resources, Assets, Capital”
3.2.3. Circular Economy System of Regional Industry
4. Empirical Analysis
4.1. Industry-Related Calculation
4.2. Model Innovation of Guangxi’s Resource Industry from the Perspective of “Resources, Assets, Capital”
4.3. Construct Guangxi’s Industrial Circular Economy System
5. Concluding Remarks
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
No. | Sectors | 2012 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA | GUANGXI | CHINA | GUANGXI | ||||||||||||||
Sensitivity Coefficient | Rank | Influence Coefficient | Rank | Sensitivity Coefficient | Rank | Influence Coefficient | Rank | Sensitivity Coefficient | Rank | Influence Coefficient | Rank | Sensitivity Coefficient | Rank | Influence Coefficient | Rank | ||
1 | Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery products and services | 1.72 | 4 | 0.72 | 36 | 3.24 | 3 | 1.07 | 15 | 1.71 | 7 | 0.75 | 35 | 1.74 | 7 | 0.73 | 38 |
2 | Coal mining products | 1.26 | 12 | 0.84 | 32 | 1.46 | 13 | 1.07 | 18 | 1.03 | 16 | 0.84 | 32 | 0.91 | 21 | 0.81 | 35 |
3 | Oil and gas extraction products | 1.45 | 9 | 0.74 | 35 | 1.31 | 14 | 0.03 | 42 | 1.18 | 11 | 0.70 | 38 | 1.10 | 11 | 0.75 | 37 |
4 | Metal mining products | 0.99 | 18 | 0.97 | 24 | 1.08 | 16 | 0.99 | 34 | 0.88 | 21 | 0.91 | 28 | 0.89 | 22 | 0.95 | 24 |
5 | Non-metallic mining products | 0.60 | 27 | 0.94 | 27 | 0.27 | 29 | 0.95 | 38 | 0.64 | 28 | 0.95 | 26 | 0.65 | 30 | 1.01 | 19 |
6 | Food and tobacco | 1.37 | 11 | 0.99 | 22 | 1.95 | 7 | 1.09 | 8 | 1.39 | 10 | 1.03 | 19 | 1.03 | 13 | 1.01 | 21 |
7 | Textile | 1.21 | 13 | 1.18 | 13 | 0.33 | 27 | 1.09 | 7 | 1.13 | 12 | 1.24 | 9 | 0.73 | 25 | 1.05 | 17 |
8 | Textiles, clothing, shoes, hats, leather, and their products | 0.55 | 30 | 1.19 | 12 | 0.30 | 28 | 1.10 | 4 | 0.64 | 29 | 1.28 | 3 | 0.56 | 33 | 1.18 | 11 |
9 | Woodworking products and furniture | 0.69 | 23 | 1.16 | 14 | 0.37 | 26 | 1.08 | 9 | 0.71 | 26 | 1.19 | 11 | 0.72 | 28 | 1.08 | 16 |
10 | Papermaking, printing, and cultural, educational, and sporting goods | 1.00 | 17 | 1.16 | 15 | 1.50 | 12 | 1.10 | 5 | 1.00 | 18 | 1.17 | 14 | 1.01 | 15 | 1.12 | 13 |
11 | Petroleum, coking products, and nuclear fuel processed products | 1.50 | 8 | 1.00 | 21 | 1.83 | 8 | 0.26 | 41 | 1.11 | 13 | 0.96 | 24 | 1.29 | 10 | 1.00 | 22 |
12 | Chemical product | 3.54 | 1 | 1.22 | 9 | 3.71 | 2 | 1.05 | 20 | 3.20 | 1 | 1.18 | 13 | 2.58 | 1 | 1.16 | 12 |
13 | Non-metallic mineral products | 0.85 | 21 | 1.12 | 17 | 0.41 | 25 | 1.01 | 32 | 0.82 | 22 | 1.09 | 17 | 0.76 | 23 | 1.12 | 14 |
14 | Metal smelting and rolled products | 2.97 | 2 | 1.21 | 10 | 2.49 | 5 | 1.01 | 33 | 2.24 | 2 | 1.13 | 16 | 2.42 | 2 | 1.18 | 10 |
15 | Metal made goods | 0.97 | 19 | 1.25 | 8 | 0.42 | 24 | 1.04 | 23 | 0.97 | 19 | 1.18 | 12 | 0.74 | 24 | 1.19 | 9 |
16 | General equipment | 1.04 | 16 | 1.27 | 4 | 0.83 | 18 | 1.05 | 21 | 1.01 | 17 | 1.26 | 6 | 0.94 | 18 | 1.26 | 5 |
17 | Professional setting | 0.69 | 24 | 1.26 | 7 | 0.54 | 21 | 1.03 | 25 | 0.75 | 25 | 1.25 | 8 | 0.73 | 27 | 1.26 | 4 |
18 | Transportation equipment | 0.95 | 20 | 1.29 | 3 | 0.70 | 19 | 1.08 | 11 | 1.09 | 15 | 1.27 | 5 | 1.07 | 12 | 1.30 | 2 |
19 | Electrical machinery and equipment | 1.09 | 15 | 1.33 | 2 | 1.14 | 15 | 1.06 | 19 | 1.10 | 14 | 1.30 | 2 | 0.99 | 17 | 1.26 | 3 |
20 | Communications, computers, and other electronic equipment | 1.67 | 5 | 1.37 | 1 | 1.79 | 9 | 1.14 | 1 | 1.84 | 3 | 1.45 | 1 | 1.86 | 5 | 1.34 | 1 |
21 | Instrumentation | 0.56 | 29 | 1.27 | 6 | 0.11 | 36 | 1.11 | 3 | 0.62 | 30 | 1.27 | 4 | 0.56 | 32 | 1.25 | 6 |
22 | Other manufactured products | 0.40 | 37 | 1.20 | 11 | 0.09 | 38 | 0.99 | 36 | 0.43 | 37 | 1.19 | 10 | 0.73 | 26 | 0.69 | 41 |
23 | Waste resources and waste-material-recycling processed products | 0.54 | 32 | 0.56 | 41 | 0.43 | 23 | 1.03 | 26 | 0.59 | 32 | 0.48 | 42 | 0.49 | 36 | 1.24 | 7 |
24 | Repair services for metal products, machinery, and equipment | 0.37 | 39 | 1.27 | 5 | 0.19 | 31 | 1.08 | 10 | 0.39 | 41 | 1.25 | 7 | 1.83 | 6 | 1.01 | 18 |
25 | Electricity and heat production and supply | 1.98 | 3 | 1.08 | 18 | 4.32 | 1 | 1.12 | 2 | 1.71 | 5 | 1.04 | 18 | 0.70 | 29 | 1.10 | 15 |
26 | Gas production and supply | 0.42 | 35 | 0.98 | 23 | 0.15 | 33 | 0.94 | 39 | 0.49 | 33 | 0.96 | 23 | 0.42 | 40 | 0.86 | 32 |
27 | Water production and supply | 0.38 | 38 | 0.87 | 30 | 0.08 | 39 | 1.09 | 6 | 0.41 | 38 | 0.90 | 29 | 0.50 | 35 | 1.20 | 8 |
28 | Building | 0.48 | 33 | 1.15 | 16 | 0.13 | 34 | 1.02 | 30 | 0.43 | 36 | 1.16 | 15 | 1.53 | 8 | 0.69 | 40 |
29 | Wholesale and Retail | 1.40 | 10 | 0.61 | 39 | 1.68 | 10 | 1.02 | 28 | 1.71 | 6 | 0.66 | 39 | 2.03 | 3 | 0.94 | 26 |
30 | Transportation, storage, and post | 1.57 | 7 | 0.95 | 26 | 2.16 | 6 | 0.84 | 40 | 1.76 | 4 | 0.88 | 30 | 1.00 | 16 | 0.93 | 27 |
31 | Accommodation and meals | 0.65 | 25 | 0.87 | 31 | 1.03 | 17 | 1.08 | 12 | 0.78 | 23 | 0.96 | 25 | 1.03 | 14 | 0.92 | 28 |
32 | Information transmission, software, and information technology services | 0.58 | 28 | 0.88 | 29 | 0.61 | 20 | 1.08 | 13 | 0.77 | 24 | 0.82 | 34 | 1.88 | 4 | 0.84 | 33 |
33 | Financial | 1.64 | 6 | 0.69 | 38 | 2.53 | 4 | 1.04 | 22 | 1.67 | 8 | 0.73 | 37 | 0.91 | 20 | 0.78 | 36 |
34 | Real estate | 0.62 | 26 | 0.55 | 42 | 0.49 | 22 | 1.02 | 29 | 0.91 | 20 | 0.58 | 41 | 1.46 | 9 | 0.86 | 31 |
35 | Rental and business services | 1.13 | 14 | 1.03 | 19 | 1.55 | 11 | 0.96 | 37 | 1.52 | 9 | 1.03 | 20 | 0.40 | 42 | 0.94 | 25 |
36 | Scientific research and technical services | 0.70 | 22 | 1.01 | 20 | 0.10 | 37 | 1.03 | 27 | 0.65 | 27 | 0.99 | 22 | 0.59 | 31 | 0.84 | 34 |
37 | Water conservancy, environment, and public facilities management | 0.41 | 36 | 0.91 | 28 | 0.05 | 40 | 1.04 | 24 | 0.46 | 35 | 0.92 | 27 | 0.47 | 37 | 0.89 | 29 |
38 | Resident services, repairs, and other services | 0.54 | 31 | 0.83 | 33 | 0.26 | 30 | 0.99 | 35 | 0.60 | 31 | 0.84 | 31 | 0.92 | 19 | 0.99 | 23 |
39 | Education | 0.37 | 41 | 0.58 | 40 | 0.12 | 35 | 1.07 | 16 | 0.39 | 40 | 0.63 | 40 | 0.46 | 38 | 0.68 | 42 |
40 | Health and social work | 0.35 | 42 | 0.97 | 25 | 0.03 | 42 | 1.07 | 17 | 0.38 | 42 | 1.00 | 21 | 0.41 | 41 | 1.01 | 20 |
41 | Culture, sports, and entertainment | 0.43 | 34 | 0.81 | 34 | 0.18 | 32 | 1.07 | 14 | 0.47 | 34 | 0.83 | 33 | 0.53 | 34 | 0.88 | 30 |
42 | Public administration, social security, and social organization | 0.37 | 40 | 0.72 | 37 | 0.04 | 41 | 1.02 | 31 | 0.40 | 39 | 0.74 | 36 | 0.43 | 39 | 0.71 | 39 |
References
- Faunce, T.; Parikh, T. Nucoal Resources Ltd V New South Wales: The Mining Industry and Potential Health Impacts of Investor-State Dispute Settlement in Australia. J. Law Med. 2016, 23, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Katz, J.; Pietrobelli, C. Natural resource based growth, global value chains and domestic capabilities in the mining industry. Resour. Policy 2018, 58, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranjan, R. The role of political-industry nexus in promoting illegal extraction of mineral resources and deforestation: A case of iron ore mining in Goa. Resour. Policy 2018, 57, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.Y.; Qin, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J. A dynamical system study for the ecological development of mineral resources in minority areas. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 2019, 12, 1073–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sadik-Zada, E.R. Distributional Bargaining and the Speed of Structural Change in the Petroleum Exporting Labor Surplus Economies. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 2020, 32, 51–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadik-Zada, E.R. Natural resources, technological progress, and economic modernization. Rev. Dev. Econ. 2021, 25, 381–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilding, M.; Merlot, E.; Leitch, S. The power of hope: The mobilisation of small and mid-tier companies in the mining industry’s campaign against the Resources Super Profits Tax. Aust. J. Political Sci. 2016, 51, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lebre, E.; Corder, G.; Golev, A. The Role of the Mining Industry in a Circular Economy A Framework for Resource Management at the Mine Site Level. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 662–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, R.; Cox, S. How the globalisation and financialisation of mining Majors affects linkage development with local engineering and technology suppliers in the Queensland resources industry. Resour. Policy 2018, 58, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aron, A.S.; Molina, O. Green innovation in natural resource industries: The case of local suppliers in the Peruvian mining industry. Extr. Ind. Soc. Int. J. 2020, 7, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- He, W.D.; Sheng, Z.L.; Hao, R. A Productivity Analysis of the Industrial Security in the Mineral Resources Mining Industry. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2016, 75, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
- Chiquini, A.; Deutsch, C.V. Mineral Resources Evaluation with Mining Selectivity and Information Effect. Min. Metall. Explor. 2020, 37, 965–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.L.; Li, X.Y.; Wang, S.; Guo, J.L.; Lv, G.F. A Multi-objective Zoning Framework for Mineral Resources Development and Management: A Case Study in Henan Province, China. Nat. Resour. Res. 2020, 29, 3103–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradel, M.; Garcia, J.; Vaija, M.S. A framework for good practices to assess abiotic mineral resource depletion in Life Cycle Assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 123296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perepelitsyn, V.A.; Yagovtsev, A.V.; Merzlyakov, V.N.; Kochetkov, V.V.; Ponomarenko, A.A.; Ponomarenko, Z.G.; Kolobov, A.Y. Prospective Technogenic Mineral Resources for Refractory Production. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2019, 60, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.J.; An, H.Z.; Qi, Y.J.; Liu, H.P. Trade and competitiveness structure of Chinas advantageous mineral resources based on the international trade network of industrial chain: A case study of Tungsten. Resour. Sci. 2020, 42, 1504–1514. [Google Scholar]
- Carvalho, J.M.S.; Costa, R.V.; Marnoto, S.; Vieira, J.C.; Sousa, C.A.A. Resource-based view of city quality: Scales development and validation. Growth Chang. 2019, 50, 856–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wegenast, T.; Khanna, A.A.; Schneider, G. The Micro-Foundations of the Resource Curse: Mineral Ownership and Local Economic Well-Being in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int. Stud. Q. 2020, 64, 530–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Q.; Wang, J.M.; Jing, Z.R. Ecological Vulnerability of Mining Resource-based Cities: A Review. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2020, 37, 825–832. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, J.T.; Lo, K.; Qiu, F.D.; Zhang, X.L.; Zhao, H.B. Regional economic resilience of resource-based cities and influential factors during economic crises in China. Growth Chang. 2020, 51, 362–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Chen, W.J.; Ning, S.Y.; Liu, E.N.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Y.A.; Zhao, M.J. Exploring the industrial land use efficiency of China’s resource-based cities. Cities 2019, 93, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.Y.; Guo, H.X.; Chen, L.F.; Liu, X.; Gu, M.Y.; Ke, X.L. Regional analysis of the green development level differences in Chinese mineral resource-based cities. Resour. Policy 2019, 61, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, M.; Zhao, H.; Li, G.; Qu, J.F. Assessment of potentially toxic pollutants and urban livability in a typical resource-based city, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 18640–18649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Bai, Z.K.; Gao, Y.G.; Zhang, L. Contribution of resource-based city urbanization to China’s urbanization. J. China Agric. Univ. 2020, 25, 163–173. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, S.Y.; Chang, J.; Hu, T.H.; Luo, P.J.; Zhou, H.X. Spatiotemporal Variations of Land Use and Landscape Ecological Risk in a Resource-Based City, from Rapid Development to Recession. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, M. Planning, transformation and development of resource based industrial cities. Open House Int. 2017, 42, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, J.T.; Zhang, P.Y.; Lo, K.; Li, J.; Liu, S.W. Conceptualizing and Measuring Economic Resilience of Resource-based Cities: Case Study of Northeast China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2017, 27, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xing, M.L.; Luo, F.Z. Comparative Study on the Optimization Path of Industrial Value Chain in China’s Resource-Based Cities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.Y.; Cui, N.N. Research on Resource Curse Effect and Transmission Mechanism in Resource-based Cities: A Case of 36 Cities in Central China. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2018, 54, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, X.J.; Dong, S.C.; Wang, G.K.; Lu, C.P. Emergy-Based Urban Ecosystem Health Evaluation for A Typical Resource-Based City: A Case Study of Taiyuan, China. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 15131–15149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.F.; Yan, J.J.; Sha, J.H.; He, G.Y.; Song, C.; Fan, S.M.; Ke, W.L. Dynamic simulation of the atmospheric environment improved by a focus on clean energy utilization of resource-based cities in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 192, 396–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Fang, Y.G.; Gu, G.F.; Liu, J.S. The Evolution and Differentiation of Economic Convergence of Resource-based Cities in Northeast China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2018, 28, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yao, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.D. Using industrial cultural heritage to transform and develop resource-based cities. Open House Int. 2019, 44, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, D.; Kong, Y.; Ren, X.H.; Shi, Y.K.; Chiang, S.W. The determinants of urban sustainability in Chinese resource-based cities: A panel quantile regression approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 686, 1210–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rickman, D.S.; Wang, H.B. Whither the American west economy? Natural amenities, mineral resources and nonmetropolitan county growth. Ann. Reg. Sci. 2020, 65, 673–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadik-Zada, E.R. Addressing the growth and employment effects of the extractive industries: White and black box illustrations from Kazakhstan. Post Communist Econ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadik-Zada, E.R.; Loewenstein, W.; Hasanli, Y. Production linkages and dynamic fiscal employment effects of the extractive industries: Input-output and nonlinear ARDL analyses of Azerbaijani economy. Min. Econ. 2021, 34, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirschman, A. The Strategy of Economic Development; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
- Sadik-Zada, E.R.; Loewenstein, W.; Hasanli, Y. Commodity Revenues, Agricultural Sector and the Magnitude of Deindustrialization: A Novel Multisector Perspective. Economies 2019, 7, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yan, J.W. Regional differences of agricultural industrial restructuring based on location quotient analysis. J. South. Agric. 2016, 47, 1795–1800. [Google Scholar]
- Quttineh, N.H.; Lidestam, H. Applying heuristics in supply chain planning in the process industry. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 2020, 11, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trstenjak, M.; Opetuk, T.; Cajner, H.; Tosanovic, N. Process Planning in Industry 4.0-Current State, Potential and Management of Transformation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Xu, J.; Liu, F. Using the Improved CGE Model to Assess the Impact of Energy Structure Changes on Macroeconomics and the Carbon Market: An Application to China. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade 2020, 56, 2093–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, M.; Liu, L.; Behrens, P.; Wang, T.; Tang, Z.P.; Chen, D.J.; Yu, Y.D.; Ren, Z.J.; Zhu, S.J.; Tukker, A.; et al. Improving Subnational Input-Output Analyses Using Regional Trade Data: A Case-Study and Comparison. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 12732–12741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.B.; Huang, P. Assessment and optimization of green space for urban transformation in resources-based city—A case study of Lengshuijiang city, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 30, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Shen, Y.; Wang, Y.N. Evaluation of economic transformation and upgrading of resource-based cities in Shaanxi province based on an improved TOPSIS method. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 37, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.; Lu, C.W.; Zhang, S.; Lu, X.; Tsai, S.B.; Wang, C.K.; Gao, Y.; Shi, Y.F.; Lee, C.H. Prediction of Ecological Pressure on Resource-Based Cities Based on an RBF Neural Network Optimized by an Improved ABC Algorithm. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 47423–47436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.Y.; Qiu, F.D.; Zhang, X.L. Heterogeneity of correlation between the locational condition and industrial transformation of regenerative resource-based cities in China. Growth Chang. 2020, 51, 771–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borlu, Y.; Matthews, S.A. Industrial Maize as a Commodity System: Spatial Scale and Relations of Production in Turkey’s Agriculture after Economic Restructuring. Tijdschr. Voor Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2018, 109, 629–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Jiang, H.Q.; Liu, G.Y.; Zeng, W.H. A study on the contribution of industrial restructuring to reduction of carbon emissions in China during the Five Year Plan periods. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 176, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.Y.; Wang, K.; Wei, Y.M. How to balance China’s sustainable development goals through industrial restructuring: A multi-regional input-output optimization of the employment-energy-water-emissions nexus. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 034018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, A.H.; Li, J. The nonlinear impact of industrial restructuring on economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions: A panel threshold regression approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 14108–14123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fournier, G.; Julio, G. On the accuracy of gravity-RAS approaches used for inter-regional trade estimation: Evidence using the 2005 inter-regional input-output table of Japan. Econ. Syst. Res. 2020, 32, 521–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira-Lopez, X.; Carrascal-Incera, A.; Fernandez-Fernandez, M. A bidimensional reformulation of location quotients for generating input-output tables. Spat. Econ. Anal. 2020, 15, 476–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.K.; Zhang, S.T.; Liu, C.X.; Zhang, H.Y. Study on the path of green and sustainable development of mining enterprises from the perspective of “resource-asset-capital”. China Min. Mag. 2020, 29, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, M.; Liu, C.; Zhang, S.; Liu, B.; Sun, Y.; Ge, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H. Research on Industry Development Path Planning of Resource-Rich Regions in China from the Perspective of “Resources, Assets, Capital”. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073988
Liu M, Liu C, Zhang S, Liu B, Sun Y, Ge X, Wang X, Zhang H. Research on Industry Development Path Planning of Resource-Rich Regions in China from the Perspective of “Resources, Assets, Capital”. Sustainability. 2021; 13(7):3988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073988
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Mingkai, Changxin Liu, Shouting Zhang, Baoyin Liu, Yi Sun, Xun Ge, Xinyu Wang, and Hongyan Zhang. 2021. "Research on Industry Development Path Planning of Resource-Rich Regions in China from the Perspective of “Resources, Assets, Capital”" Sustainability 13, no. 7: 3988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073988