Optimal Operation of Floodwater Resources Utilization of Lakes in South-to-North Water Transfer Eastern Route Project
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. General Situation of Jiangsu Section of Phase I of East Line of SNWT Project
2.2. System Generalization and Engineering Overview
2.2.1. Generalization of Lake Group System
2.2.2. General Situation of Pumping Station Project System
2.3. Utilization Mode and Potential Evaluation of Flood Resources
2.3.1. Estimation of Available Flood Resources
2.3.2. Selection of Floodwater Resources Utilization Mode
2.4. Optimal Operation of Floodwater Resources Utilization of Lakes
2.4.1. Establishment of Floodwater Resource Utilization Model for Lakes
2.4.2. Solution Algorithm
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Utilization Mode and Potential Evaluation of Flood Resources in the Study Area
3.1.1. Estimation of Available Flood Resources
3.1.2. Selection of Floodwater Resources Utilization Mode
3.2. Calculation of Optimal Scheduling Decision Scheme
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Katyal, A.; Petrisor, I. Flood Management Strategies for a Holistic Sustainable Development. Environ. Forensics 2011, 12, 206–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, P.; Xu, G.; Bing, J.; Xu, C.; Jia, J. Evaluation method of rain-flood resource utilization availability and its application in the Hanjiang River Basin. J. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2020, 20, 3557–3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Qin, H.; Mo, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, D.; Pang, S.; Yin, X. Hierarchical Flood Operation Rules Optimization Using Multi-Objective Cultured Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition. J. Water Resour. Manag. 2019, 33, 337–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takeuchi, K. Flood management in Japan-From rivers to basins. J. Water Int. 2002, 27, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, D.N.; Baliarsingh, R.; Raju, R.S. Optimal Reservoir Operation for Flood Control Using Folded Dynamic Programming. J. Water Resour. Manag. 2010, 24, 1045–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shen, D.; Speed, R. Water resources allocation in the People’s Republic of China. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2009, 25, 209–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pal, S.K.; Adeloye, A.J.; Babel, M.S.; Gupta, A.D. Evaluation of the effectiveness of water management policies in Bangladesh. Water Resour. Dev. 2011, 27, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, G.; Ikeda, S. Empirical analysis of Japanese flood risk acceptability within multi-risk context. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2008, 8, 1049–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maqsood, I.; Huang, G.H. A dual two-stage stochastic model for flood management with inexact-integer analysis under multiple uncertainties. J. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2013, 27, 643–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheehan, J.; Brown, J. Flood risk management: Property rights-focussed instruments in Australia. J. Environ. Sci. Policy 2021, 119, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mobley, W.; Sebastian, A.; Blessing, R.; Highfield, W.E.; Stearns, L.; Brody, S.D. Quantification of continuous flood hazard using random forest classification and flood insurance claims at large spatial scales: A pilot study in southeast Texas. J. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2021, 21, 807–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, L.; Wan, X.; Wang, X.; Zhao, F.; Zhong, P.; Liu, M.; Yang, Q. Floodwater Utilization Based on Reservoir Pre-Release Strategy Considering the Worst-Case Scenario. J. Water 2020, 12, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Qiu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.Z.; Li, Y. An interval two-stage stochastic programming model for floodresources allocation under ecological benefits as a constraint combined with ecological compensation concept. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dadmand, F.; Naji-Azimi, Z.; Farimani, N.M.; Davary, K. Sustainable allocation of water resources in water-scarcity conditions using robust fuzzy stochastic programming. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Water Resources Department of Jiangsu Province. Study on the Utilization of Flood Resources in the First Phase of the East Line of South to North Water Transfer Project; Hohai University: Nanjing, China, 2017.
- Wang, W.J.; Wu, X.W.; Fang, G.H.; Wen, X. Optimal water operation in Jiangsu section of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. J. South-to-North Water Transf. Water Sci. Technol. 2015, 13, 422–426. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Fang, G.H.; Zhu, X.H.; Huang, X.F. Risk analysis of floodwater resources utilization along water diversion project: A case study of the Eastern Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China. J. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2019, 19, 2464–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Qiu, B.; Cao, H.; Wei, Q.; Teng, H. Optimal Operation for Baoying Pumping Station in East Route Project of South-to-North Water Transfer. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2009, 1, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.Y.; Li, F.F.; Qiu, J. A New Evaluation for Water Transfer Optimal Schemes with the Consideration of Reliability, Stability, and Severity. J. Water Resour. Manag. 2017, 31, 2823–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, S.; Zhou, J.; Li, C.; Liao, X.; Wang, H. Optimal design for flood limit water level of cascade reservoirs. Water Resour. Manag. 2015, 29, 445–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Li, J.; Li, R.; Wei, W.; Wang, L. River basin water resource compensation characteristics by set pair analysis: The Dongjiang example. Front. Earth Sci. 2014, 8, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, J.; Guo, A.; Du, H.; Wang, Y. Floodwater utilization for cascade reservoirs based on dynamic control of seasonal flood control limit levels. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Guo, S.; Liu, P.; Xu, C. Joint operation and dynamic control of flood limiting water levels for mixed cascade reservoir systems. J. Hydrol. 2014, 519, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.F.; Lin, J.; Qu, X.P.; Fang, G.; Zhu, L. Research on Water Level Control Scheme of Reservoir Flood Resources Utilization Considering Dam Safety and Risk Benefit. In ACSR-Advances in Computer Science Research, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation (ICMRA 2015), Shenzhen, China, 20–21 April 2015; Atlantis Press: Shenzhen, China, 2015; pp. 67–72. [Google Scholar]
- Ostadrahimi, L.; Marino, M.A.; Afshar, A. Multi-reservoir Operation Rules: Multi-swarm PSO-based Optimization Approach. J. Water Resour. Manag. 2012, 26, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Y.; Guo, S.; Xu, C.-Y.; Liu, D.; Chen, L.; Wang, D. Integrated optimal allocation model for complex adaptive system of water resources management (II): Case study. J. Hydrol. 2015, 531, 977–991. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, C. Research of water resources allocation of South-to-North Water Diversion East Route Project in Jiangsu Province, Eastern China. Agu Fall Meeting. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (2015); AGU Publication: Nanjing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, G.M.; Zhao, J.Z.; Liu, G.H. Eco-environmental benefit assessment of China’s South-North Water Transfer Scheme—The middle route project. J. Environ. Sci. 2004, 16, 308. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, X.; Wang, H.; Li, Q.; Feng, Y. Analysis on interconnection between water resources of Hongze Lake and Luoma Lake and study on coupled model for its optimal regulation. J. Water Resour. Hydropower Eng. 2016, 47, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, B.; Wang, P.F.; Qian, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, N.N.; Cui, X.A. Characteristics, sources, and photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in large and shallow Hongze Lake, China. J. Great Lakes Res. 2017, 43, 1165–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Z.; Sun, P.; Ji, C.; Zhou, J. Credibility theory based dynamic control bound optimization for reservoir flood limited water level. J. Hydrol. 2015, 529, 928–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.F.; Chen, Y.Q.; Lin, J.; Fang, G.; Qu, X.; Zhu, L. Research on benefit of reservoir flood resources utilization based on the dynamic control of limited water level. J. Desalination Water Treat. 2017, 79, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiang, H.; Yu, Z.; Mo, C. Reservoir Flood Season Segmentation and Optimal Operation of Flood-Limiting Water Levels. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2014, 20, 05014035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, H.Y.; Dong, Z.C.; Jia, W.H.; Ni, X.; Chen, M.; Zhu, C.; Li, D. Competitive Relationship between Flood Control and Power Generation with Flood Season Division: A Case Study in Downstream Jinsha River Cascade Reservoirs. Water 2019, 11, 2401. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, H.C.; Wang, F.X.; Liang, G.H. Decision-making on reservoir flood control level and its control manner in post-flooding seasons for Biliuhe Reservoir. J. Adv. Water Sci. 2009, 20, 857–862. [Google Scholar]
Section | Level | Name of Pumping Station | Design Scale/(m3/s) | Design Head/(m) | Number of Installed Units |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hongze Lake ~Luoma Lake | 4 | Siyang Station | 230 | 6.3 | 6 |
4 | Sihong Station | 120 | 3.7 | 5 | |
5 | Liulaojian Station | 230 | 3.7 | 4 | |
5 | Suining Station | 110 | 9.2 | 3 | |
6 | Zaohe Station | 175 | 4.65 | 2 | |
6 | Pizhou Station | 100 | 3.2 | 4 | |
Luoma Lake ~Nansi Lower Lake | 7 | Liushan Station | 125 | 5.73 | 5 |
7 | Taierzhuang Station | 125 | 4.53 | 6 | |
8 | Xietai Station | 125 | 5.84 | 5 | |
8 | Wannian Gate Station | 125 | 5.49 | 5 | |
9 | Linjiaba Station | 75 | 2.4 | 4 | |
9 | Hanzhuang Station | 125 | 4.15 | 5 |
Stages | Qm/(m3/s) | Cv | Cs/Cv | Peak Discharge Qp/(m3/s) | 3-Day Flood Volume Wp/(108 × m3) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1% | 0.05% | 1% | 0.05% | ||||
Main flood season | 5440 | 0.98 | 2.5 | 7842 | 11,757 | 20.55 | 11.98 |
later flood season (16 August to 10 September) | 4133 | 1.96 | 2.5 | 5985 | 7785 | 15.10 | 16.02 |
later flood season (11 September to 30 September) | 3874 | 1.03 | 2.0 | 4028 | 6028 | 18.17 | 11.12 |
Stages | Qm/(m3/s) | Cv | Cs/Cv | Peak Discharge Qp/(m3/s) | 3-Day Flood Volume Wp/(108 × m3) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1% | 0.05% | 1% | 0.05% | ||||
Main flood season | 1479 | 0.95 | 2.5 | 1908 | 2423 | 8.55 | 11.98 |
later flood season (16 August to 10 September) | 1785 | 1.12 | 2.0 | 3270 | 4611 | 11.44 | 16.02 |
later flood season (11 September to 30 September) | 1919 | 1.08 | 2.0 | 1720 | 2220 | 7.92 | 11.12 |
Inflow and Outflow of the Lake | July | August | September | Sum | Inflow and Outflow of Canal | Water Delivery Capacity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outflow Hongze Lake | 2.39 | 2.81 | 1.33 | 6.53 | Inflow Zhong Canal | 4.29 |
Inflow Xuhong Canal | 2.24 | |||||
Inflow Luoma Lake | 1.16 | 1.59 | 0.10 | 2.85 | Outflow Xuhong Canal | 0.92 |
Outflow Zhong Canal | 1.93 | |||||
Outflow Luoma Lake | 2.07 | 1.59 | 2.07 | 5.72 | Inflow Bulao Canal | 2.86 |
Inflow Hanzhuang Canal | 2.86 | |||||
Inflow Nansi Lake | 1.54 | 1.06 | 1.54 | 4.13 | Outflow Bulao Canal | 1.55 |
Outflow Hanzhuang Canal | 2.58 | |||||
Outflow Nansi Lake (Jiangsu) | 1.54 | 1.06 | 1.54 | 4.13 | Inflow Liangji Canal | 4.13 |
Risk Category | Risk Indicators | Risk Value | Combination Weight | Comprehensive Risk | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk of water storage project B1 | Hongze LakeC1 | 7.88 | 0.1258 | 0.991304 | 1.890846 |
Luoma LakeC2 | 4.58 | 0.1049 | 0.480442 | ||
Nansi Lower LakeC3 | 5.08 | 0.0825 | 0.4191 | ||
Risk of water conveyance project B2 | Zhong CanalC4 | 4.95 | 0.1038 | 0.51381 | 1.159985 |
Xuhong CanalC5 | 3.45 | 0.065 | 0.22425 | ||
Bulao CanalC6 | 3.02 | 0.0709 | 0.214118 | ||
Hanzhuang CanalC7 | 3.39 | 0.0613 | 0.207807 | ||
Risk of water lifting project B3 | Siyang StationC8 | 4.58 | 0.0535 | 0.24503 | 1.239133 |
Sihong StationC9 | 3.72 | 0.042 | 0.15624 | ||
Liulaojian StationC10 | 1.58 | 0.0768 | 0.121344 | ||
Suining StationC11 | 1.16 | 0.0296 | 0.034336 | ||
Zaohe StationC12 | 4.25 | 0.0626 | 0.26605 | ||
Pizhou StationC13 | 2.85 | 0.0533 | 0.151905 | ||
Liushan StationC14 | 3.88 | 0.0681 | 0.264228 | ||
Sum | 54.37 | 1.0001 | 4.289964 | 4.289964 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yang, Z.; Huang, X.; Liu, J.; Fang, G. Optimal Operation of Floodwater Resources Utilization of Lakes in South-to-North Water Transfer Eastern Route Project. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094857
Yang Z, Huang X, Liu J, Fang G. Optimal Operation of Floodwater Resources Utilization of Lakes in South-to-North Water Transfer Eastern Route Project. Sustainability. 2021; 13(9):4857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094857
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Zitong, Xianfeng Huang, Jiao Liu, and Guohua Fang. 2021. "Optimal Operation of Floodwater Resources Utilization of Lakes in South-to-North Water Transfer Eastern Route Project" Sustainability 13, no. 9: 4857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094857