Next Article in Journal
Harmony of Sustainability and Productivity: Korean Templestay as Sustainable Tourism
Next Article in Special Issue
Can I Get Back Later or Turn It Off? Day-Level Effect of Remote Communication Autonomy on Sustainable Proactivity
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Feature Selection Technique to Better Predict Climate Change Stage of Change
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Pro-Environmental Employee Engagement: The Influence of Pro-Environmental Organizational, Job and Personal Resources

Sustainability 2022, 14(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010043
by Simon L. Albrecht *, Andy Bocks, Jack Dalton, Anthea Lorigan and Alec Smith
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010043
Submission received: 30 November 2021 / Revised: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 14 December 2021 / Published: 21 December 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is necessary to review the text, because in some paragraphs or in the bibliography there are words with a different font. (for example, line 800, 805, 827, 830, and so on)

The paper is interesting, but I think it is possible to obtain more information, and therefore, greater conclusions. it's a good work.

Author Response

We are pleased Reviewer 1 assesses the paper to be good work. As per the revised submission, we have gone through the paper and where appropriate have corrected the text and the references (e.g., adopted a consistent font in the references).

Reviewer 2 Report

In my opinion, the article presents interesting aspects related to pro-environmental employee engagement and the resources indicated. The article was structured in a logical and coherent way. My only doubt is the selection of respondents. An in-depth analysis would probably reveal significant differences in the perception of the aspects discussed between people in decision-making positions compared to executive employees. Similar disparities may also emerge depending on seniority. 
It is worth highlighting the compilation of the blibliography, among which about 30% are items from 2017 and younger. 
A correction in the form of formatting is required in this section, as the inventory contains different sizes and colour of bibliographic items.

Author Response

We are pleased Reviewer 2 assesses the paper presents interesting aspects related to pro-environmental employee engagement and resources. As per the revised submission, we have gone through the paper and where appropriate have corrected the content and the formatting of the references (i.e., adopted a consistent font throughout).

We agree with Reviewer 2 with respect to the potential value in assessing differences between people in decision-making positions compared to executive employees; however, we do not have sufficient demographic data in the sample to meaningfully conduct the appropriate analyses.

Back to TopTop