sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Rethinking Work: Organizing People for Sustainability and Well-Being at Work

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Psychology of Sustainability and Sustainable Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2022) | Viewed by 8791

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 84 I-38068 Rovereto (TN), Italy
Interests: job crafting; proactive work behaviors; remote working; work design

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

After having faced the pandemic outbreak, leading organizations are now using it to reconfigure work and pave the way for future sustainable growth (Lund et al., 2021). New hybrid remote work models have been developed and are currently being tested to merge the benefits of remote working with those deriving from the physical aspects of work. In this new context, just like organizations, employees rethink and proactively revise their work tasks and activities (Parker and Grote, 2020), directly contributing to the success of distributed work organizations. Hence, the outcomes and sustainability of hybrid work are determined by the choices that both companies and employees make in rethinking work. This awareness implies that successful hybrid working requires organizational planning and intentional efforts to redesign jobs, processes, and expected outcomes (Kniffin et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). Moreover, within these new work configurations, innovative ways of working and their success are strongly shaped by employees’ choices that reflect their proactivity and skills (Parker and Grote, 2020).

Now that the pandemic emergency is over and new work configurations are being implemented, research is needed to shed light on the conditions for positive work behaviors to emerge in the new context. Against this background, this Special Issue aims at deepening knowledge and collecting evidence on the impact of innovative ways of organizing people on individual and organizational outcomes related to sustainability and well-being at work. Contributions may focus on but are not limited to exploring, discussing, and investigating the effectiveness of organizational initiatives implemented to reorganize people’s jobs and boost sustainable work-related outcomes. Evidence-based case studies, as well as quantitative or qualitative longitudinal investigations that can provide fruitful insights on how to successfully reimagine roles, activities, and tasks for future growth, are welcome.

References:

  • Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., Ozcelik, H., … Vugt, M. V. (2020). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. The American Psychologist, doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
  • Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., Smit, S., Ellingrud, K., Meaney, M., & Robinson, O. (2021). The future of work after COVID‑19. McKinsey Global Institute.
  • Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2020). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology.
  • Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2020). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology.

Dr. Arianna Costantini
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • human resource management
  • hybrid work
  • proactive work behaviors
  • remote working
  • work design
  • work redesign

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 1446 KiB  
Article
Analysis of a Teleworking Technology Adoption Case: An Agent-Based Model
by Carlos A. Arbelaez-Velasquez, Diana Giraldo and Santiago Quintero
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 9930; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169930 - 11 Aug 2022
Viewed by 1286
Abstract
An agent-based model for teleworking technology adoption is presented, including the risk of office closure in the event of a lockdown. It analyzes an adoption case using simulations and can be adapted to other cases and teleworking promotion strategies to contribute to sustainability. [...] Read more.
An agent-based model for teleworking technology adoption is presented, including the risk of office closure in the event of a lockdown. It analyzes an adoption case using simulations and can be adapted to other cases and teleworking promotion strategies to contribute to sustainability. Simulations produce smooth sigmoidal curves that reasonably fit to real adoption curves. The simulation results suggest that the main reason for the observed increase in the adoption rate is the increase in the risk of office closures, the consequent increase in the usefulness of teleworking technology, and the increase in external influence that motivates them. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2877 KiB  
Article
Can I Get Back Later or Turn It Off? Day-Level Effect of Remote Communication Autonomy on Sustainable Proactivity
by Yujing Liu, Jing Du, Jin Nam Choi and Yuan Li
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1856; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031856 - 6 Feb 2022
Viewed by 2067
Abstract
Overwhelming remote communication episodes have become critical daily work demands for employees. On the basis of affective event theory, this study explores the effect of daily remote communication autonomy on positive affect and proactive work behaviors. We conducted a multilevel path analysis using [...] Read more.
Overwhelming remote communication episodes have become critical daily work demands for employees. On the basis of affective event theory, this study explores the effect of daily remote communication autonomy on positive affect and proactive work behaviors. We conducted a multilevel path analysis using a general survey, followed by experience sampling methodology, with a sample of 80 employees in China who completed surveys thrice daily over a two-week period. The results showed that daily remote communication autonomy increased positive affective reactions, which, in turn, enhanced proactive work behaviors on the same workday. Furthermore, positive day-level relationships leading to employee proactivity were only significant when the employees’ person-level general techno-workload was not high. The findings provide a new perspective for managing employees working under continuous techno-workload and demands for remote interactions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 930 KiB  
Article
Pro-Environmental Employee Engagement: The Influence of Pro-Environmental Organizational, Job and Personal Resources
by Simon L. Albrecht, Andy Bocks, Jack Dalton, Anthea Lorigan and Alec Smith
Sustainability 2022, 14(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010043 - 21 Dec 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4539
Abstract
As organizations continue to respond to the existential challenge that is climate change, the extent to which employees engage in environmental sustainability is critical to that response. This study introduces new measures of pro-environmental employee engagement, pro-environmental job resources and pro-environmental meaningful work. [...] Read more.
As organizations continue to respond to the existential challenge that is climate change, the extent to which employees engage in environmental sustainability is critical to that response. This study introduces new measures of pro-environmental employee engagement, pro-environmental job resources and pro-environmental meaningful work. Based on engagement theory, a model is tested that shows how perceived corporate environmental responsibility, pro-environmental job resources (supervisor support, involvement, information) and pro-environmental meaningful work (a personal resource) influence pro-environmental employee engagement. Online self-report survey data were collected through convenience sampling from 285 full-time and part-time employees (aged 18–89 years) working across a range of occupations and organizations in Australia. Data were analyzed using a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM). In support of the proposed model, CFA and SEM results generally yielded a good fit to the data. Eight of nine proposed direct effects involving corporate environmental responsibility, pro-environmental job resources (modelled as a higher-order construct), pro-environmental meaningful work, and pro-environmental engagement, were significant. All proposed indirect effects within a re-specified model were significant. The final model explained 51% of the variance in pro-environmental job resources; 20% in pro-environmental meaningful work; and 71% in pro-environmental employee engagement. Overall, the results indicate that perceived organizational, job and personal resources play a motivational role in enhancing pro-environmental employee engagement. The study contributes a theory-based model and new measures of employee pro-environmental resources and engagement. The model can be applied to help organizations assess and develop interventions to address the critically important issue of environmental sustainability. Future research directions and study limitations are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop