Next Article in Journal
Using Modified Harmonic Analysis to Estimate the Trend of Sea-Level Rise around Taiwan
Previous Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Variations in Summertime Ground-Level Ozone around Gasoline Stations in Shenzhen between 2014 and 2020
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Managing Supply Chain Activities in the Field of Energy Production Focusing on Renewables

1
Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport/College of International Transport and Logistics, Alexandria P.O. Box 1029, Egypt
2
Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, 3000 Celje, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(12), 7290; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127290
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 2 June 2022 / Accepted: 12 June 2022 / Published: 14 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Distributed Energy Systems and Resources)

Abstract

:
Nowadays, the research community focuses on sustainability studies that are at the severe phase in the transformation towards a sustainable world. In addition, reducing the human impact on the environment requires a shift from traditional energy to renewables, which have increased significantly during recent decades as sustainable energy sources. Hence, this study assesses renewable energy sources and their related production phases from a supply chain management perception, screening and reviewing the integration between the supply chain management within the area of energy production focusing on renewable energy resources. The study executes a systematic review of English literature published on international scientific databases, focusing on the previous decade 2010–2020, to congregate the recently updated knowledge related to such research area. Thus, this study provides an authentic review of the literature that points to the relationship between supply chain operations and the area of renewable energy manufacturing from another side. Several literature reviews have been available concentrating on particular areas of managing renewable energy supply chains; however, no review has highlighted the practices of supply chain processes in energy production, focusing on renewables. The searching process relies on the published works that focus on such an area to be analyzed and characterized based on different methodologies they propose; thus, prospective and future research interests are delineated.

1. Introduction

Renewable Energy (RE) has been a vital concern in the clean economy by decreasing the usage of polluted energy (e.g., fossil energy) because of its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. RE sources such as solar, wind, and tidal power are environmentally friendly by nature [2,7,8,9,10] and cheaper energy production [11,12]. Therefore, RE sources are evolving options to fulfill the energy future demand [8,13] because they are renewed with a continuous cycle [14]. RE as reasonable resources has grown extensively in the last 30 years [15], as governments and worldwide companies extensively unrestricted their goals to boost the development of RE production [16]. For example, a cooperative work has been prepared to discover several methods in which wind energy will offer 20% of U.S. electrical power by 2030; wind power projects conducted in China aim to transfer 15% of its total energy consumption in 2020 by operating 24 offshore wind projects with a capacity of 6.7 GW [17,18]; and leading IT companies, such as Apple, Google, and Facebook are pushing noteworthy plans to run their organizations with a growing percentage of RE resources [11].
P. Venturi, et al. (1999) [19] was the first published work representing the relation between the Supply Chain (SC) and RE production unintentionally, as the paper analyzed the production chains of woody energy crops. From that time, the importance of Supply Chain Management (SCM) in the RE sector has attracted the attention of the public, private actors, and academic communities, with the knowledge that an effective SC for the RE deployment can extensively support power sector expansion [20]. Nonetheless, the SC systems for the RE deployment are still challenging with regard to the capital investment, energy conversion costs, logistics networks, geographical constraints, and lack of economies of scale [9,21]. Besides, with reference to the growth of environmental responsiveness in terms of the supply chain concepts, new trends initiated in the literature explicitly include the Green Supply Chain (GSC), the Sustainable Supply Chain (SSC), and the circular supply chain [22,23,24]. Concepts such as the SSC and the sustainability implications of the GSC have an influential role in the RE sector, offering weighty sustenance for the expansion of the power sector and making it easy for organizations to simply approve these practices [25,26]. However, the challenges of energy SCM show a discrepancy in the literature concerning energy production technologies, especially renewables.
Therefore, the SCM of energy sectors and their infrastructures clarifies energy resources’ availability and their costs, which might blaze a trail for further saleability of RE resources [27,28]. Nevertheless, higher conversion costs, limited sites, environmental influences, etc., pose obstacles to such development [9]. Therefore, the significant expansion of renewable energies has challenges from a SCM side; also, the integration between RE and the SC has a fundamental part in the economic and social improvements [29], so the relation between them is one of the imperative research topics. As a result, the literature on logistics and supply chain practices in the renewable energy context has been amalgamated with transportation, forecasting, network optimization, and inventory management [1].
The primary purpose of this review is to offer an incorporated decisive analysis and synthesis of the literature that provides a conceptual outline for the interrelation between SCM and its related activities in the RE production field. Consequently, this paper systematically investigates the variety of know-how and options by examining the literature on SCM, which can be exploited to utilize the available RE resources and motivate how supply chain views may boost the RE production expansion and identify a specific practical involvement between supply chain and RE production. In addition, researchers may use this study to catch a general synopsis of supply chain contributions in RE production previously shown with various methodologies and the scientific gaps existing in the published works.
Hence, this research inscribes the subsequent research questions: (i) What is the recent state-of-art related to SCM and RE production? and (ii) What are the prospective scopes in SC activities corresponding to the RE production? Thus, the two research questions are explored by precisely revising the relevant publications in different scientific databases are the leading research goal, which could be accomplished based on the systematic review conducted on the published literature in the specified research area, focusing on the period from 2010 to 2020 in order to encompass the most updated knowledge.
The arrangement of the remaining review sections is as follows: Section 2 pinpoints the relation between SCM and RE production; Section 3 outlines the approach used to conduct this study; Section 4 clarifies the analysis and results of the reviewed literature. Meanwhile, the limitations of this study and future scopes for the prospective works of this research discipline are specified in Section 5, followed by the practical and managerial implications in Section 6; then, the conclusion and future research prospectives are delineated in the last section. In the end, the appendices are separated into (A) demonstrates the distribution of literature according to the covered regions studied, and (B) comes up with the classification of the literature according to their research perspectives.

2. SCM and RE Production

The field of SCM expands to various interdisciplinary ranges: economics, business, organizational science, industrial psychology, and operations research. As a result, from one side, the concerns in SCM regarding knowledge remain to enshrine attention from an assortment of study areas. On the other hand, supply chain administrators have recognized the incorporation of environmental, economic, and social aspects; thus, they are concerned about green and supply chain management sustainability [29]. Businesses initially use SCM to help regulate the chains of events related to both products or services [30]. Hence, from an energy production perspective, SCM presents a combination of principles that qualify active administration of flow between the place of usage (transference to the end clients) and the location of raw materials [27].
There are various approaches and methodologies in the published studies revealed that the SC in RE fields has a significant role in economic growth [29], with the fact, SC for RE deployment shares similarities to other typical supply chain systems [9]; therefore, the Renewable Energy Supply Chain (RESC) term is created, which is defined as “the transformation of raw energy into usable energy and involves an effective set of management principles from the acquisition of energy resources to the consumption of usable energy” [20]. Consequently, the RESC fundamentals include information flows and physical and financial streams [9].
The RESC can be divided into three phases: upstream, production, and downstream, mainly consisting of five sub-phases: procurement, generation, transmission, distribution, and demand. These phases cover all processes along the RESC from raw materials until converted into final useful products. Hence, RESC main objectives are to provide a regular and consistent supply of raw materials and promote RE technologies [20,21]. In this sense, SC behavior should consider main elements like suppliers, prospective locations, prospective consumers, and the capacities of service and their areas from the RE facilities to the end-users [9].
The principles of SCM can handle the challenges of energy production generally via two groups: organizational performance and operational performance [27]. SCM is imperative for two specific areas, (i) Characterizing the organization that shapes the energy production supply chain sectors, managers must handle the geographical distribution of minor actors and large organizations from the place of raw materials to the site of usage, recognizing demand diversity, and to offer a tactic for management of buyer-supplier interactions. (ii) Sharing the features of perishable goods for numerous lower-valued energy carriers, expressly the raw materials, especially in biomass. Thus, practices have to be designed around operational performance (sizing, timing, eco-efficiency, and capacity utilization) [31]. Hence, this review is conducted to discover how scholars handle such previous aspects, especially for renewable energy deployment.

3. Methodology

3.1. Literature Refinement

The approach used to conduct the review has multiple procedures; firstly, the manual search was employed to exclude word search restrictions that could avoid pertinent publications. Then, the search and review criteria were conducted on two separate topics, which are supply chain management and energy production, considering the renewable energy supply chain. Hence, all relevant keywords related to the specified topics wereidentified according to synonyms and main concepts to ensure the search is comprehensive. Therefore, keywords such as “logistics”, “supply chain”, “energy production”, and “renewable energy production” were used during the publications gathering and filtering processes. The search strategy combines all concepts into a singular search, as the search protocol used was “supply chain” OR logistics of “energy production” OR “renewable energy production”. Finally, the search criteria depended on titles, abstracts, keywords, highlights, and subject terms.
The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB) has facilitated institutional access to the full texts of the searched papers from various data sources that contain the most popular scientific databanks like Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Google Scholar, as well as ProQuest. Additionally, the integral software is used to manage the citation of references. The search was restricted to articles in English from 2010 until the end of 2020 and most closely related to aspects for a good grasp of renewable energy production and the supply chain systems. The following Table 1 and Table 2 represent the narrowing process and ignore the repetition; hence this study focused on 330 filtered publications out of 378 resulting from the searching processes.
The coding criteria have been established to assess the content of the scientific works refined by searching on the key concepts identified instead of looking only at the actual words, which a computer algorithm cannot as yet accomplish. It involves coding for inclusion or exclusion that makes a judgment based on the title and abstract whether the study under consideration fits the predetermined inclusion criteria; therefore, they should be retained or discarded from further analysis. Hence, the authors manually executed the exclusion phase by reading each paper abstract to determine and assess its quality and to what extent the publication was relevant to the intended criteria. Figure 1 explains the dataset processing phases that consist of three main phases followed in conducting this study that started with the inclusion phase and ended with the analysis phase.
As a result, the study focused on 272 works out of 330, including 136 peer-reviewed scientific papers, 81 postgraduate dissertations, mainly Ph.D. theses, 37 conference papers, 13 book chapters, and 5 technical articles, as demonstrated in Figure 2. Hence, the research process includes the maximum number of relevant publications that explain the relation between RE production and the supply chain systems from one side and the importance of well concurrence of RESC systems from the other side. In addition, the review shows a portentous increase in recent years, as illustrated in Figure 3.

3.2. Literature Ramification

Both authors discussed the filtered publications and traced the citations in the 272 papers to find additional references to other studies. However, no further relevant publications were recognized [32]. Accordingly, the authors started combining and analyzing the acceded publications concerning their main ideas, findings, and results in order to investigate main research schemes and determine the scientific gap in such a research field. For the purposes of simplifying the analysis, the acceded publications were categorized according to the types of RE discussed. The adjective systematic review clarifies 8 specific research areas related to the relationship between RE productions and SCM according to the energy types, which could be divided into two main categories, as presented and sorted in Figure 4.
As shown in Figure 5, The first category is the literature that examined the relationship between one or more supply chain and logistics activities (i.e., transportation, inventory management, storage systems, etc.) with one of the RE production fields, such as the 186 works for bioenergy, 23 for wind, 12 for solar, and six for hydrogen energy. Category one also involves the studies discussing the general concepts and frameworks that could be applied to any kind of renewable energy application without determining a specific type, defined as Renewables. The second category is the publications that mix two types or more of renewable energies designated as Hybrid Renewable Energy System (HRES), for example, the eight studies that combined wind and solar power and their relation to supply chain and logistics activities.
The regions covered by published literature as they detached into six defined specific regions, which are explained by countries in Appendix A. In addition, these regions are illustrated in Figure 6 with the numbers of published works that cover reviewed research area in this paper. Nevertheless, some kinds of literature their case study or model applied to several countries around the world, which is defined as Worldwide. Additionally, most of the literature offered general theories or models that could be applied generally in the renewable energy supply chain field without determining a specific region or country to apply, which is shown as Not Specified.
Finally, Figure 7 expresses the top scientific journals and their impact factor according to the numeral works available in the reviewed research area in this paper. It can be perceived that several published works in this paper have been published in the highly impacted factor journals, which prospectively might acquire additional citations in the near future.

4. The Analysis and Results

The authors revised the literature again by carefully reading the main bodies of the publications to determine to what extent the publications are relevant to the research area intended to be reviewed. Hence, the two categories are analyzed according to the main topics covered within a specific research area extracted from the two tables in Appendix B, demonstrating the organization of literature depending on relevance. Simultaneously, the authors anatomize the literature in these tables to explain the studies organization according to the aim or purposes of the study, the method or approach followed, the geographical area covered, the main finding and results, and how they regulate the relationship between the renewable energy production and supply chain.

4.1. Bio-Energy and Supply Chain (Stream 1—Category 1)

Regarding the relationship between bioenergy production and the SCM, there are 186 published works diversified between research papers, theses, conference papers, and book chapters extracted from the research process. However, Table 3, extracted from the information provided in Appendix B, focuses on the most relevant publications linking bio-energy production with supply chain and logistics activities, reflecting many topics covered in this area. As shown in Figure 8, Firstly, managing the supply chain of biomass products which has the highest excessive coverage; secondly, biomass transportation problems and how to overcome them; thirdly, the supply chain simulation of biomass; and finally, intelligent logistics system for biomass production, which remains in its initial stage as research started from 2018.

4.2. Renewables and Supply Chain (Stream 2—Category 1)

As summarized in Table 4 and Figure 9, there is an ultimate research direction on joining the supply chain activities through RE in general. The first research aspect includes a large number of publications that discuss the SCM that might be generally experimented within any field of RE. The second discipline concentrates on planning a renewable energy system. Then, the final research area focused on renewable energy usage in operating logistics activities to be green.

4.3. Wind Energy and Supply Chain (Stream 3—Category 1)

Table 5 shows the state-of-art between supply chain and logistics activities with wind farms operations. According to the literature published, the distribution of works illustrated in Figure 10 is divided into the first area covered was supply chain and logistics of wind energy production and supply chain simulation of wind farms approximately presents half of the published works, and the rest of the results were divided equally between two areas; (i) supply chain activities that related to the installation phases of wind farms projects, and (ii) supply chain activities for the purpose of maintaining the wind farms.

4.4. Solar Energy and Supply Chain (Stream 4—Category 1)

The analysis of the publications covered the solar energy stream, shown in Appendix B, Table A7, explained that the research in this field is considered recent as all publications were published in 2020. Although, supply chain optimization of solar energy was the common interest of those publications, which have been debated with various methodologies. The rest of the results generated from the research process argued about areas related to the technical solar energy issues and some economic aspects that are not associated with the supply chain or logistics themes.

4.5. Hydrogen Energy and Supply Chain (Stream 5—Category 1)

The review has discovered that the relation between SCM and hydrogen energy production is still in its nascent phase, as recently a book published in 2018 demonstrates the hydrogen logistics chain optimum control, with a certain concentration on a system of integrated abilities, production sources, methods of storing, and arrangements and the distribution procedures to the final clients. Besides, two papers published were a review of all models regarding the network design of the hydrogen supply chain. Furthermore, another two publications compared the various techniques to determine the hydrogen energy infrastructure and storage schemes; one was in Germany, and another was in South Korea. Otherwise, the rest of the studies discuss the infrastructure regarding hydrogen energy, which did not indicate the relation between supply chain activities and hydrogen energy production.

4.6. HRES and Supply Chain (Category 2)

Table A8 in Appendix B illustrates those works that group two types or more of renewable energy production as a hybrid system and their relationship with supply chain and logistics activities. Hence, the hybrid wind-solar energy system is highlighted in the literature appropriately, as four published works pinpoint such a hybrid system. Moreover, two papers develop the supply chain model for bioenergy and hydropower, one for energy security and the most recent for sustainable networking. In 2014, an article compiled between the bioenergy and wind for renewable electricity supply chains.

5. Limitations and Prospective Scopes

This review has several limitations; considering the descriptive data and the results presented in tables and figures, the statistical analysis is not deployed. Besides, the four scientific search engines only used: WoS, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ProQuest, which might not be enough to cover all relevant published works comprehensively. However, the study has offered a wide range of published scientific works related to such a field without harming the entire study and its reputation. In addition, the publications divergence produced from the searching in different search engines with various datasets and filtering procedures that cannot assure the quality levels of filtered works is the same. In the future, the prospective studies can enhance the searching strategies by more determinations for the databases used for conducting such research and assess the reliability and validity of results using statistical analysis and focusing on the datasets with the identical strands to ensure the quality of the publications gathered.

6. Practical and Managerial Implications

This review classifies and categorizes all relevant concerns related to SCM for energy production, with more concentration on renewable energy resources. Accordingly, the study has organized this relationship into two main categories with eight key sub-branches to facilitate the literature refinement process and to determine the research gap regarding this field accurately; thus, the findings illustrated from this classification have led to clarify the scientific research gaps, which might be covered thereafter in the future studies which are the critical intent of this study. Additionally, although the increasing number of publications regarding SCM and RE production. However, according to the analysis of the published works and their classifications highlighted in this review, it could be determined that:
  • Various aspects of the supply chain and logistics activities within the RE production field are adequately covered in the literature, such as managing, controlling, and modeling the supply chain for biomass, wind, and solar power production. However, it needs more attention for the rest of the renewables (i.e., geothermal, hydropower, and tidal).
  • Most of the studies concentrated on bioenergy, approximately 68% of the screened literature addresses this category. Additionally, managing the supply chain of biomass products to produce bioenergy such as bioethanol, biofuel, or biogas was the central theme within this category as it represented about 65% of the published works in this area. Hence, increasing the scientific contributions regarding the other disciplines is required, especially the intelligent logistics system for biomass production such as optimization and modeling, intelligent transportation systems, or blockchain and information control.
  • Some regions were sufficiently studied, while others need more adequate research in such a field; for example, the highest ratio goes to North America and Europe. At the same time, in contrast, the West of Asia, the golf area, and Africa have the lowest research studies. However, those areas have good opportunities to establish and develop renewable energy farms. Moreover, due to their nature, location, and weather, they might also be hub areas in renewable energy production. Notwithstanding, most of these areas comprise developing countries, and most of them have a deficiency in energy resources.
  • Transportation; as one of the logistics activities, it is covered only in biomass production because the biomass production scope is the only field that has physical movements, while the rest of RE transportation operations are via networking and grids, so no physical movements exist but only designs and planning for such networks that require engineering techniques. Nevertheless, the research community should contemplate supply chain activities of non-physical activities such as optimal network planning, network capacity optimization, and timely distribution and delivery.
Furthermore, the results of this review show some positive managerial implications in the existing literature for business sectors, especially for supply chain service providers to reduce dependency on traditional energy. Simultaneously, the analysis presents that using renewable energy in supply chain activities to be green operations was one of the streams covered during the last decade. Hence, they are required to adjust their activities and strategies for sustainable expansion based on renewable energy in order to sustain their business by merging renewable energy usage into their services to reduce carbon emissions in the long run and achieve sustainable business performance. However, boosting the supply chain activities to be green is restrained by some obstacles, such as the transformation cost, governmental procedures, organization characteristics, service limitations, etc. [26]. Thus, the proper understanding of these barriers is the key success factor in executing the green supply chain activities and applications.

7. Conclusion and Future Research Prospective

The relationship between SC and RE technologies development has been a subject of growing attention in the previous published scientific works. Although the literature related to the logistics and supply chain practices associated with the renewable energy context has been amalgamated with transportation, forecasting, network optimization, and inventory management; however, the most concentrated on biomass as it has more materialistic activities than the others. Therefore, according to the analysis conducted, the oncoming research may opt and dedicate an in-depth consideration via empirical examinations, proper modeling, and simulation tools to cover the types of RE and their related supply chain and logistics activity, which are rare in the literature, such as geothermal, hydrogen, hydropower, tidal, and HRES. Additionally, the most newly cradle aspects that need more investigation due to their importance principally for a sustainability concept, such as intelligent logistics for RE production, using simulation tools to optimize the supply chain activities within RE production, the supply chain for maintaining the RE systems (i.e., maintenance supply chain).

Author Contributions

I.H.; Conceptualization, methodology, analysis and Results, resources, and original draft preparation. M.K.; review and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The published works according to their regions (sorted alphabetically)
Table A1. Africa (Region 1).
Table A1. Africa (Region 1).
KenyaAlstone, P. (2015) [102]
South AfricaBatidzirai, B., et al. (2016) [103]
Table A2. Asia (Region 2).
Table A2. Asia (Region 2).
Asia generallyFoo, D.C., et al. (2013) [104]
ChinaHu, Y. and H. Cheng (2013), Zhao, W., et al. (2019), Hensel, N.D. (2011), Zhang, Y., et al. (2012), Besha, P. (2013), and Lefevre-Marton, N. (2013) [5,87,105,106,107,108]
IndiaGumte, K.M. and K. Mitra (2019) and Yadav, Y.S. and Y. Yadav (2016) [53,109]
IndonesiaNugroho, Y.K. and L. Zhu (2019) [50]
IranMahjoub, N. and H. Sahebi (2020), Rahemi, H., et al. (2020), Gilani, H., et al. (2020), Fattahi, M., et al. (2020), Shahbazbegian, V., et al. (2020), Manouchehrabadi, M.K., et al. (2020), and Dehghani, E., et al. (2020) [12,34,41,43,110,111,112]
JapanIshii, K., et al. (2016) [113]
Malay PeninsulaYokoi, Y., et al. (2018) [59]
MalaysiaLo, S.L.Y., et al. (2020), Aziz, N.I.H.A., et al. (2020), Ling, W.C., et al. (2019), Leong, H., et al. (2019), Zahraee, S.M., et al. (2019), Hong, B.H. and H.L. Lam (2015), Choo, Y.M., et al. (2011), Hassan, M.N.A. (2012), Lam, H.L., et al. (2013), Umar, M.S., et al. (2013), Bujang, B. and A. Safuan (2014), and Shaharudin, M.S. and Y. Fernando (2015) [38,46,51,52,57,70,114,115,116,117,118,119]
PakistanAmer, M., (2013) and Mun, K.G. (2016) [120,121]
South KoreaSeo, S.-K., et al. (2020) [122]
ThailandManakit, P. (2018) [123]
Table A3. Europe (Region 3).
Table A3. Europe (Region 3).
Europe generallySikkema, R., et al. (2010), Marinelli, A., et al. (2012), Lange, K., et al. (2012), Monforti, F., et al. (2013), López, E., et al. (2016), García-Galindo, D., et al. (2016), Arranz-Piera, P., et al. (2016), Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š., et al. (2017), Garcia, C.A. and G. Hora (2017), Korpinen, O.-J., et al. (2017), and Mastrocinque, E., et al. (2020) [23,100,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132]
AustriaKanzian, C. and M. Kühmaier (2017) [133]
DenmarkKoch, C., et al. (2017) and Sambra, A., et al. (2018) [134,135]
FinlandKc, R., et al. (2020), Korpinen, O.J., et al. (2016), Karttunen, K., et al. (2012), Tahvanainen, T. and P. Anttila (2011), Palander, T. (2011), Karttunen, K., et al. (2013), and Tuominen, R., et al. (2018) [39,68,77,78,79,136,137]
FranceAnnevelink, E., et al. (2016) [138]
GermanyVojdani, N. and F. Lootz (2012), Richter, A., et al. (2012), and Reuß, M., et al. (2019) [99,139,140]
IrelandSosa, A., et al. (2015) [141]
ItalyGarofalo, P., et al. (2020), Gnoni, M., et al. (2011), Dal-Mas, M., et al. (2011), Pari, L., et al. (2013), Pantaleo, A., et al. (2013), and Cannemi, M., et al. (2014) [42,142,143,144,145,146]
SerbiaPerić, M., et al. (2020) [35]
SpainVelazquez-Marti, B. and E. Fernandez-Gonzalez (2010), Serrano, A., et al. (2015), Pari, L., et al. (2016), Annevelink, B., et al. (2017), and Jeong, J.S. and Á. Ramírez-Gómez (2018) [83,147,148,149,150]
TurkeyŞengül, Ü., et al. (2015), and Durmaz, Y.G. and B. Bilgen (2020) [14,45]
United KingdomNowak, J.W. (2014), Dunnett, A. (2011), Irawan, C.A., et al. (2018), Abad, A.V., et al. (2015), Yu, M. (2015), and Khan, S.A.R. and D. Qianli (2017) [2,81,96,151,152,153]
Table A4. North America (Region 4).
Table A4. North America (Region 4).
CanadaChavez, H., et al. (2017), Alam, M. (2014), Shabani, N. and T. Sowlati (2013), Calvert, K. (2013), Chávez, H., et al. (2017), and Weldu, Y.W. (2017) [65,154,155,156,157,158]
MexicoDíaz-Trujillo, L.A. and F. Nápoles-Rivera (2019) [54]
United States of AmericaArent, D., et al. (2014), Li, Y., et al. (2020), Vance, L., et al. (2012), Saghaei, M., et al. (2020), Kang, S., et al. (2020), Esmaeili, S.A.H., et al. (2020), Roni, M.S., et al. (2017), Poudel, S.R. (2017) Lin, T., et al. (2016), Hartley, D.S. (2014), Kazemzadeh, N. and G. Hu (2013), Dhanju, A. (2010), Brathwaite, N.H. (2010), Parker, N., et al. (2010), Tun-Hsiang, E.Y., et al. (2011), An, H. (2011), Han, S.-K. (2011), Parker, N.C. (2011), Vimmerstedt, L.J., et al. (2012), de Bourgeois, W. (2012), Okwo, A. (2012), Sharma, B. (2012), Zhang, J., et al. (2013), Leahy, J. and L. Lindenfeld (2013), Awudu, I.K. (2013), Bai, Y. (2013), Emery, I.R. (2013), Lin, T. (2014), Shah, A. (2013), Argo, A.M., et al. (2013), Osmani, A. and J. Zhang (2014), Tallaksen, J. and T.S. Kush (2014), Aitken, M.L. (2014), Jenkins, T.L. (2014), Marufuzzaman, M. (2014), Memisoglu, G. (2014), Zhang, F. (2011), Lee, J.H. (2014), Osmani, A. and J. Zhang (2014), Caffrey, K.R. (2015), Field, J.L. (2015), Tong, W. (2015), Zhang, L. (2015), Angelis, S. (2016), Campbell, R.M. (2016), Chen, M. (2016), Pokharel, R. (2016), Reyes, G. (2016), Beach, R.H., et al. (2017), Mooney, D.F. (2017), Seel, J. (2017), Sampat, A.M., et al. (2018), Li, Y. (2018), and Ozkan, D. (2011) [3,16,30,33,40,44,63,64,67,71,76,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203]
Table A5. Oceania (Region 5).
Table A5. Oceania (Region 5).
AustraliaGhaffariyan, M.R., et al. (2016) [204]
Table A6. Europe (Region 6).
Table A6. Europe (Region 6).
ArgentinaBragado, M.V., et al. (2019) and Rodríguez, M.A., et al. (2016) [56,205]
BrazilHerrera, M.M., et al. (2020) and Bradshaw, A. (2018) [95,206]
EcuadorAseffe, J.A.M., et al. (2020) [47]
PeruBarreto, C.M. (2015) [207]
VenezuelaPietrosemoli, L. and C.R. Monroy (2013) [91]

Appendix B

Literature classification
Table A7. The most relevant published works that include one type of renewable energy production and supply chain and logistics published after 2010 (category 1).
Table A7. The most relevant published works that include one type of renewable energy production and supply chain and logistics published after 2010 (category 1).
ReferenceYearThe General Purpose of the StudyMethod/ApproachGeographical Area (if Any)The Main Findings/Results of the Study
Bioenergy
[28]2020It aims to form data-oriented modeling to improve SCM related to forest and biomass.Data-oriented modelingNoneThe main results of this study revealed that promising prospects for data-driven tools are big data technologies.
[33]2020Offers solutions to reduce the electricity production costs from woody biomass.Mixed-integer non-linear
programming
USAIt is concluded that the proposed Improved Cross-Entropy achieves better compared to conventional Cross-Entropy by 5.6%.
[7]2020Proposes a structure of biomass-based supply chain for power generation.System DynamicsNoneThe results detected the significant variables to biomass supply chain development by a causal diagram.
[34]2020It offers a framework that addresses land-use sustainability and optimal bioethanol supply chain development.Mixed-integer linear programmingIranThe main results of this study concluded that the planned integrated land planning-network design problems for bioethanol supply chain planning are solved.
[35]2020Focuses on the environmental impact of fuel consumption on several phases of the woody biomass supply chain.Qualitative approachSerbiaThe results indicated that chipping was the most environmentally exhausting because of the expected practice productivity and high level of diesel consumption in out-of-date types of machinery.
[36]2020Reviews all publications on modeling a supply chain for biomass production.ReviewNoneThe key results of this review revealed that the examination of several different variables must be included for energy supply chain models, also the main disadvantages of its use.
[37]2020Presents the biomass network integration for the energy supply chain designs.Optimization modelNoneThe main results revealed that a decrease in the emissions cost of up to 4.32% is realizable on the integrated network of 5–8% for the biomass energy supply chain designs.
[38]2020Provides a synopsis of the diverse methodologies used for the viability evaluation of biomass-based engineering.ReviewMalaysiaIt was found that the mathematical modeling with optimization represents 78% of the literature reviewed.
[16]2020Examines the biofuel supply chain from economic performance and an environmental impact point of view.Mathematical modelUSAThe bioethanol production from co-fermentation of cellulosic biomass has been proposed.
[39]2020Optimizes the dynamic features of the forest biomass supply chain for environmental sustainability.Mathematical modelFinlandThis study revealed that depending on which kind of biomass and its source, the forest biomass supply chain incarnated GHG emissions from 2.72 to 3.46 kg CO2-eq per MWh.
[40]2020It offers a framework for proposing a biofuel supply chain.Optimization modelUSAThe main results revealed that the lowest fuel price of microalgae-based biodiesel is $10.92/gal biodiesel, about three times higher than the recent biodiesel price of $3.51/gal biodiesel.
[41]2020Proposes bioethanol production from sugarcane.Optimization modelIranThe suggested model encourages more convenient decisions than the deterministic model via average and standard deviation of objective values.
[42]2020It aims at assessing the energy crop of sugar beet suitability.Mathematical modelItalyThis paper describes the multi-composite metric built on ad hoc modules.
[43]2020Uses various technologies to develop a supply chain system for biomass power production.Mathematical modelIranThe economic viability, the sustainability characteristics, and the required arrangement for the supply chain system design have been proved by computational results.
[44]2020Analyses the effects of two different financial inducements inspiring first-generation bioethanol manufacturers to use second-generation biomass.Linear programming modelsUSAThe key results of this review concluded that first-generation bioethanol manufacture is more effective than second-generation bioethanol.
[45]2020Provides the network of the biomass supply chain using the optimal design and planning.Mixed-integer linear programmingTurkeyThe results concluded that the key control on decisions and financial returns is the maximum distance parameter and purchasing prices.
[46]2020It aims at examining the biogas supply chain sustainability.Conceptual frameworkMalaysiaThe conceptual framework of biogas production based on environmental sustainability using life cycle assessment has been proposed
[47]2020Assesses the environmental performance of the seed-corn supply chain by energy recovery from corncob residuesExperimental analysisEcuadorThe results determine a technical alternative for converting the corncob supply chain by integrated thermochemical conversion processes.
[48]2019Concerns about the cost of a bio-methane gas optimization supply chain.Mixed-integer mathematical modelNoneThe model impacts both technological improvement and the economic value of biogas energy production.
[49]2019Offers a mathematical optimization model for the costs of logistics and carbon footprints of the RESC.Mathematical modelNoneThe model integrates the effect of carbon emissions as a cost parameter in the supply chain of mixed-refinery bio-oil.
[50]2019Develops an optimization and planning platform of biofuel _under sustainable supply chain planning_ that unifies biofuel products, operations, and network structures.Mathematical modelIndonesiaThe results indicate an optimal region of the composition ratio between different biomass products.
[51]2019Synthesizes a mathematical optimization method for a bio-electricity supply chain grid.Mathematical modelMalaysiaThe result revealed that, at the various seasons of supply and demand diversities, the decision-makers could conclude the possibilities of the upcoming bio-electricity projects.
[52]2019Develops a hybrid optimization methodology of Bio-energy Supply Chain Network (BSCN).Mathematical modelMalaysiaThe analysis indicates the optimal power plant methodologies combined heat and power systems.
[53]2019Develops an optimization model for optimizing the Net Present Value (NPV) using supply chain networks.Mixed-integer linear programmingIndiaThe results show the influence of different constraints such as transportation modes, available areas, global fuel price fluctuations, and feedstock availability on the NPV.
[54]2019Presents the lowest environmental effect and the optimal profit by a multi-objective optimization method applied to a biogas supply chain.Optimization modelMexicoThe main results of this study revealed that the model implementation produces key environmental and economic enhancement because of the synchronous growth in the total yearly profit and carbon footprint reduction.
[55]2019Conducts a review on detailed modeling of the biomass supply chain designing, planning, and management.ReviewNoneThis review concluded that it is essential to comprise sustainability and uncertainty research schemes into large-scale systems optimization.
[56]2019It offers a model that achieves the optimal profits and picks the uttermost biomass supply chain.Mathematical modelArgentinaThe model indicates that the utmost value was achieved by delivering the available stuff of lower market value, then the rest of higher value stuff but with reasonable logistics costs.
[57]2019Assesses the Biomass Supply Chain (BSC) from an environmental sustainability perspective.Simulation modelingMalaysiaThe results show that for a sustainable improvement of palm biomass, transportation enhancement and production effectiveness should have the priority to work on BSC.
[58]2019Reviews all publications on the optimization methodologies for the adequate supply chains managing and controlling forest biomass.ReviewNoneUpcoming research should provide cohesive frameworks that achieve the optimal biomass supply chain at the different management levels.
[59]2018Analyses and designs a sustainable Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) supply chain.Case studyMalay PeninsulaThe EFB can be competitive when comparing its performances with various fuels.
[60]2018Demonstrates the technicality of animal waste (horse manure) for energy conversion supply chains.Qualitative approachNoneThe findings confirmed that the horse manure-to-energy at all phases of the supply chain has discrete features.
[61]2018Presents optimization models for bio-power supply chains to help design and administrational sustainability.Optimization modelsNoneThe proposed models could use by utility enterprises to realize some techniques to advance bio-power production and have enhanced environmental impacts.
[62]2018Evolves pruning biomass supply chain using the Smart Logistics System (SLS) applications.Qualitative approachNoneThe SLS enhances the pruning biomass supply chain performance and saves logistics costs.
[63]2017Designs a model that captured the balance achieved of supplying bio-fuels between costs, social, and environmental aspects.Multi-objective hub-and-spoke modelUSAThe results help policy-makers to propose procedures that inspire renewables production.
[64]2017Analyses two vital problems in the biomass supply chain network field: the pre-disaster planning problem and the inbound feedstock supply uncertainty of bio-energy supply chain networks.Models and algorithmsUSAThe results revealed that the congestion cost plays a substantial part in picking the size and location of the multimodal facilities in bio-energy supply chain networks.
[65]2017Proposes a biomass quality and cost optimizing model to ensure conversion technology components.Simulation-based Multi-Objective OptimizationCanadaThe results demonstrate that this method is eligible for discovering an efficient assortment of non-dominated solutions.
[66]2016Addresses multi-scale supply chain optimization of biomass-to-bioenergy.Models and algorithmsNoneThe proposed models can be reformed to cover more styles of supply chains, and the proposed solution algorithms are general and not limited to specific applications.
[67]2016Compares the delivery costs using biomass pre-processing techniques, using two different transport means.Optimization modelUSAThe proposed findings revealed that the transport costs of biomass could pursue the design of coal transport. Transforming biomass to ethanol regionally and transporting it for long distances is economically efficient, the same as the existing grain-based biofuel system.
[68]2016Presents dynamic modeling methods for inspecting prospects for cost savings in biomass logistics.Static and dynamic modelingFinlandBackhauling and High-capacity-truck Transportation (HCT) are distinctive schemes in biomass transportation by road, creating the best competition in long-distance transport.
[69]2016Develops a model for a viable scheme with thermal energy storage of biomass supply chains and District Heating Systems (DHS).Fuzzy optimization approachesNoneThe results revealed that the model could efficiently support decision-makers to design an energy production system effectively.
[70]2015Proposes a waste-to-energy supply network using a multiple biomass corridor concept.Mathematical modelMalaysiaThe potential central processing hubs are allocated, and the ideal technics network of the processing hub is specified.
[71]2014Examines existing woody bio-energy facilities to explain the drivers of establishing bioenergy projects.Quantitative approachUSAThe proposed tactic enhances the provincial economy by decreasing energy costs, job opportunities creation, and local improvement.
[72]2014Improves an operative model for the supply chain network for biogas production.Mixed-integer linear programming modelNoneThe recommended method correctly identifies the supply of biomass and product distribution decisions. Besides, strategic decisions like determining the quantities, sizes, and sites of bio-gas factories and required biomass warehouses.
[73]2013Develops a framework for different kinds of customers concerning torrefaction configuration from a supply chain point of view.Conceptual approachNoneThe suggested framework clarifies various components of torrefaction supply and demand.
[74]2013Describes energy requirements, energy objects, conversion practices, biofuel feedstocks, and a complete review of the Biomass Supply Chain (BSC).ReviewNoneThe results provide the starting points for the realization of biomass feedstocks, biofuel production, and a complete study of the BSC planning and modeling.
[75]2013Promotes a GIS-based approach for biomass supply chain models.Mathematical programming modelNoneThe developed method generates input data to biomass supply chain models by more efficient biomass residue availability data.
[76]2013Assigns an optimized scheme for the biofuel refineries supply chain.Mathematical programming frameworkUSAThe developed approaches focus on maximizing the predictable profit and the qualification of system risk in various circumstances.
[77]2012Analyses the cost of biomass transport operations in Finland’s Lake Saimaa area.Discrete-event simulationFinlandAccording to the simulation study results, the waterway transportation of forest chips had a competitive cost compared with road transportation by trucks after 100–150 km.
[78]2011Creates a GIS-based approach to simulate the cost for some supply chains regarding woody biomass.Mathematical programming
model
FinlandThe results revealed that the most cost-competitive chain comparing various distances using road and rail transport.
[79]2011Considers a multiple objective model for scheduling problems applied to the industrial energy supply chain.Dynamic multiple objective programming modelFinlandThe results illustrate the potential electricity production effects in Finland.
[80]2011Presents a literature review of articles that screened the interface of the production of bio-energy and matters of logistics.ReviewNoneThe results classify the issues and challenges that ensure a balanced and competitively priced feedstock supply for bioenergy facilities.
[81]2011Presents a SCM optimization model for the infrastructures of the bio-energy, using a spatially distinct modeling framework.Optimization modelUKThe innovative dynamic model formulation offered, driving technicality of the spatial-dynamic growth of the bioenergy infrastructures.
[82]2011Presents an approach regarding biorefineries production optimization planning and facility location.Optimization modelNoneThe model proposes the optimal choice of various patterns considering the specific location configuration, selection of biomass, and processing infrastructures.
[83]2010Presents a method to choose the authentic points for the locations of a bioenergy factory.Mathematical algorithmSpainThe findings determine the workshop locations that convert biomass into bioenergy for a set of cities. Besides, the workshop location points are considered destinations in the network when the logistics models are concluded.
[84]2010Presents the essential elements of various kinds of biomass supply chains.Linear mixed-integer modelingNoneThe results present the supply, node, dryer, and storage schemes for the existing cases in this study.
[85]2010Improves efficient biomass-to-biorefinery supply chains for creating biofuels as a feasible alternative.Optimization modelsNoneThe solution algorithms provided will help researchers efficiently resolve the multi-commodity supply chain plan and management difficulties for biorefineries.
Renewables
[86]2020Studies the agreement of long-term service in the supply chain of electricity.Game theory
and the dynamic programming
NoneThe results show that the utility firm’s optimal conventional capacity decision follows a two-threshold policy, exhibiting a hysteresis phenomenon.
[87]2019Investigates policy special effects under various supply chain network arrangements.Theoretical modelChinaThe results pinpointed the following aspects: firstly, the total profits of the renewables producing firm have been dwindled because of the rises in the share obligation and the permit price; secondly, the charged price flexibility of a retailer has been risen by the differential pricing once confronting in the permit price, and the shared commitment rose; and finally, the totaled profits of the supply chain have been expressively increased by the collaboration between the renewables producing firm and the retailer.
[6]2019Delivers an inclusive bibliometric investigation that offers a complete grasp of the supply chain performance and renewables field.ReviewNoneProviding a prospective scheme for the research community in this field.
[1]2018Provides study for the existing and prospecting published works in RESC detecting the core features of the modeling methods for the supply chain using system dynamics.ReviewNoneThe findings disclosed a lack of system dynamics usage in the renewables supply chain. Furthermore, modeling the macro view of renewable energies has not been explored yet. It also requires more consideration of the social aspects of the supply chain in sustainability concepts.
[88,89]2018Explores the significance of RE and green actions in logistics practices.- Ordinary Least Square (OLS) [89]
- Generalized
Method of Moments (GMM) [88]
NoneThe results revealed that renewables are motivating factors of green logistics practices that foster environmental and economic sustainability.
[90]2016Provides a conceptual model applied to renewable energy projects (RES) that can provide a dimensioned agreement between logistic chain links.Multicriteria analysis methods (AHP) and management programs (DBR and SAP-MRP)NoneThe cooperation between supply chain activities in the execution of renewable energy projects offers new improvement opportunities, collaboration, and support an economic advantage for energy produced from RES to reach sustainable development goals.
[3]2014Discovers various scenarios of the effects of acquiring higher standards of clean electric power.Case studyUSAGHG emissions could be decreased by using renewable sources such as water.
[91]2013It underlines the fundamental issues that facilitate the supply of renewables worldwide, which is incredibly convenient for developing countries.Case studyVenezuelaThe result demonstrates an organizational limitation in supporting knowledge generation. Sharing and reusing such valuable resources could be stimulated to solve some of the construction problems described in this study.
[5]2013Presents a synopsis of the status and development of renewables to generate electricity and debates the various obstacles that limited the progression of the Chinese renewables industry.ReviewChinaThe long-distance transmission networks are required to spatial disharmony in renewable energy supply. Also, more research and technology improvement and financial procedures should be elaborated to support the sustained development of renewable electricity generation.
[29]2013Investigates literature that considers the benefits of performance upgrading and overcomes obstacles to renewables supply chain enhancement.ReviewNoneFrom an economic view, support the distribution channels by the technological side, energy efficiency, and advanced storage. From an environmental image, improve production processes with low emissions. Finally, from a social perspective, encourage the involvement of inhabitants to generate new job opportunities.
[92]2013Recognizes crucial areas of the business to let new actors from engineering, business, and policy to enter the renewables industry effectively.Business modelNoneThe model leads to determine the 7 sides that could help the new actors in the renewables business, which are (strategic, resource, technology, feasibility analysis, value creation, customer and market, and stakeholder).
[9]2012Evaluates renewable energies from a supply chain point of view with the current electric system.Qualitative approachNoneThe managerial perceptions of researchers, governments, and stakeholders for introducing renewable electric energy usage are provided.
[93]2011Discusses the approaches to addressing Wind, Water, and Sun (WWS) to ensure the stability between the power supply and its demand.Qualitative approachNoneThe results confirmed that obstacles to all conversions to WWS power worldwide are predominantly social and political, not technical or economic issues.
[94]2010Presents a novel method to optimize the renewables supply for regional energy.P-graph frameworkNoneA new clusters supply chain algorithm of the energy is revealed.
Wind energy
[95]2020Assesses the alternatives of simulation modeling to improve the wind energy supply chainSimulation modelBrazilThe proposed model represents the core time delays in the wind energy supply chain.
[96]2018Proposes a combined model to set up the offshore wind turbine farms using port selection criteria and SC optimization.Integer Linear ProgrammingUKThe results determine the utmost appropriate installation port for the case study offshore wind farm and figure the total transportation costs of the overall SC costs.
[97]2017Investigates offshore wind logistics practices in Europe and China to analyze the capability of SC to guarantee green practices.Qualitative approachEurope and ChinaThis study discovers the respective capacities of the SC where global association and experience transfer may expedite positioning.
[98]2015Reviews the literature that covers the maintenance logistics of the offshore wind system.ReviewNoneThe findings revealed that the literature on maintenance logistics strategic decisions had gained the peak consideration, then the tactical and operational decisions.
[99]2012Presents offshore wind farms methodologies to design SC networks.Qualitative approachGermanyThe findings could be used to improve more methods to assess the prospective influence of professional logistics on offshore wind systems.
[100]2012Develops a simulation model that cerebrates several logistics characteristics of wind energy.Simulation modelEuropeThe simulation tool developed in this study considers different logistical characteristics of the maritime supply chain in offshore wind farms.
[101]2010Analyses the fundamental conditions and current conflicts of supply chains for offshore wind installations.Mixed-integer linear programmingNoneThe resulting calculations clarify an optimum installation schedule for offshore wind turbines by detecting various weather conditions. Besides, it can also be used to shrink vessel operation times independence on seasonal or updated weather forecasts.
Solar energy
[110]2020Proposes a supply chain network and reverse logistics to design and optimize a thin-film photovoltaic.Bi-objective modelIranThe results confirmed that using an optimistic approach to face uncertainty decreases the costs by 20% compared with the usage of a pessimistic approach.
[23]2020Develops a sustainable supply chain approach in the solar energy industry.Multi-criteria decision-making frameworkEuropeThe framework offers a dominant tool to decision-makers for making decisions for sustainable investment in the photovoltaic energy industry.
[111]2020Develops a two-echelon (multi-period and multi-product) for the solar cell supply chain.Mathematical modelIranThe proposed model determines which scenario to be selected and defines how many solar panels of two kinds should be installed.
[112]2020It aims at reducing the environmental footprints and conventional cost objective of the concerned supply chain.Mathematical modelIranThe proposed model offers splendid practical and managerial insights into the solar energy supply chain.
[208]2020Explores a solar industry of contemporary trade conflict between China and the USA.Game-theoretical modelingChina and USAThe results determine that the Free Trade policy would be the leading solution and SCM for developing solar energy sustainability.
Hydrogen energy
[122]2020Involves a hydrogen supply chain construction.Optimization modelSouth KoreaThe results show that a hydrogen supply chain centralized storage structure advanced the phase transition of central hydrogen production plants.
[209]2020Investigates the evolution of publications on hydrogen research and the collaboration network of the international scientific community.ReviewNoneThe analysis of international collaboration networks is listed.
[140]2019Executes an infrastructure assessment via spatial resolution for hydrogen energy infrastructures.Spatially resolved infrastructureGermanyThe findings indicate that salt caverns and transmission pipelines are the main techniques for prospect hydrogen infrastructure schemes.
[210]2019Reviews the scientific works that scrutinize the Hydrogen Supply Chain Network Design (HSCND) systems.ReviewNoneThe prospective (HSCND) model problems for the upcoming study are explained.
[211]2018Discusses the main inspirations of hydrogen as a future alternative fuel, presenting current directions in hydrogen production and challenges for the upcoming supply chain of hydrogen energy.Mathematical modelsNoneThe book helps recognize the approaches used to evaluate the viability of developing a hydrogen supply chain, infrastructures, and safety performance.
Table A8. The most relevant HRES publications with supply chain and logistics schemes were published after 2010 (category 2).
Table A8. The most relevant HRES publications with supply chain and logistics schemes were published after 2010 (category 2).
ReferenceYearThe General Purpose of the StudyMethod/ApproachGeographical Area (if Any)The Main Findings/Results of the Study
Solar and wind energy
[212]2018Provides a net-zero carbon production-inventory system regarding energy prosumerism.Optimization modelNoneThe results revealed that a net-zero carbon production-inventory system is achievable and affordable, provided the photovoltaic setting up cost is well-matched with wind generation.
[213]2018Presents a complete framework for handling stored energy in micro-grids, focusing on renewable resources’ pure uncertainty.Mathematical modelsNoneThe results revealed significant enhancements in the Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP) algorithm and other regularization structures.
[214]2017Investigates the feasibility of controlling overall supply chain networks with net-zero-carbon on-site farms for wind and solar energy.Optimization modelNoneThe experiments prove that a net-zero-carbon is technically and economically feasible according to the supply chain operation given in this study.
[8]2016Carries out a complete review of several phases of the solar-wind energy scheme.ReviewNoneThe study explains the prefeasibility analysis, optimal size, modeling, control characteristics, and reliability concerns regarding the solar-wind energy scheme.
Hydro-bio energy
[12]2020It aims at developing a bioenergy supply chain model for network design to assess the hybrid system.Case studyIranThe results revealed that the microalgae/Jatropha is more feasible than livestock manure and agricultural residues for energy production.
[121]2016Develops coal-based energy supply chains gradually over time and applies the supply chain management concept to water resource development, finally offering the end-to-end and active views required to expand the hydropower network for energy security.Mathematical modelPakistanThe results demonstrate the value of the supply chain in hydropower network expansion and provide visions of the prorated performance between popular practices and various strategies on the mix and sequence of sites with multiple forms and capacities.
Bio-energy and wind energy
[179]2014Considers the network layout and optimal allocation of electric biomass and wind energy supply chain.Stochastic programming modelUSAThe model shows that the key effect on the decisions is the subsidy level for renewable electricity production.

References

  1. Fontes, C.H.; Freires, F.G. Sustainable and renewable energy supply chain: A system dynamics overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 247–259. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nowak, J.W. Quantitative Risk Assessment for a National Renewable Energy Target; The George Washington University: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arent, D.; Pless, J.; Mai, T.; Wiser, R.; Hand, M.; Baldwin, S.; Heath, G.; Macknick, J.; Bazilian, M.; Schlosser, A.; et al. Implications of high renewable electricity penetration in the US for water use, greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, and materials supply. Appl. Energy 2014, 123, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, J. A Simulation-Based Decision Support System for Electric Power Demand Management Considering Social Network Interactions; The University of Arizona: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2013; p. 264. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hu, Y.; Cheng, H. Development and bottlenecks of renewable electricity generation in China: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3044–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Azevedo, S.G.; Santos, M.; Antón, J.R. Supply chain of renewable energy: A bibliometric review approach. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 126, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. García-Alcaraz, J.L.; Sánchez-Ramírez, C.; Avelar-Sosa, L.; Alor-Hernández, G. Systemic Approach for the Design of Renewable Energy Supply Chain Generated from Biomass. In Techniques, Tools and Methodologies Applied to Global Supply Chain Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 259–283. [Google Scholar]
  8. Khare, V.; Nema, S.; Baredar, P. Solar–wind hybrid renewable energy system: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wee, H.M.; Yang, W.H.; Chou, C.W.; Padilan, M.V. Renewable energy supply chains, performance, application barriers, and strategies for further development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 5451–5465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Erdinc, O.; Uzunoglu, M. Optimum design of hybrid renewable energy systems: Overview of different approaches. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1412–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qi, W. Design and Management of Networked Energy and Logistics Systems; University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mahjoub, N.; Sahebi, H. The water-energy nexus at the hybrid bioenergy supply chain: A sustainable network design model. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 119, 106799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Cavallaro, F.; Khalifah, Z. Sustainable and renewable energy: An overview of the application of multiple criteria decision making techniques and approaches. Sustainability 2015, 7, 13947–13984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Şengül, Ü.; Eren, M.; Shiraz, S.E.; Gezder, V.; Şengül, A.B. Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renew. Energy 2015, 75, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Little, S. A Delphi Study on Risk and Uncertainty Decision Making for Renewable Energy Green Supply Chain Management; Northcentral University: Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, Y.; Kesharwani, R.; Sun, Z.; Qin, R.; Dagli, C.; Zhang, M.; Wang, D. Economic viability and environmental impact investigation for the biofuel supply chain using co-fermentation technology. Appl. Energy 2020, 259, 114235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. IRENA. Future of Wind: Deployment, Investment, Technology, Grid Integration and Socio-Economic Aspects. 2019. Available online: https://www.irena.org/publications/2019/Oct/Future-of-wind (accessed on 29 March 2022).
  18. Qu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Appolloni, A.; Li, M.; Liu, Y. Measuring green growth efficiency for Chinese manufacturing industries. Sustainability 2017, 9, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Venturi, P.; Gigler, J.K.; Huisman, W. Economical and technical comparison between herbaceous (Miscanthus x giganteus) and woody energy crops (Salix viminalis). Renew. Energy 1999, 16, 1023–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jelti, F.; Allouhi, A.; Büker, M.S.; Saadani, R.; Jamil, A. Renewable power generation: A supply chain perspective. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernando, Y.; Bee, P.S.; Jabbour, C.J.; Thomé, A.M. Understanding the effects of energy management practices on renewable energy supply chains: Implications for energy policy in emerging economies. Energy Policy 2018, 118, 418–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Esposito, E. Environmental sustainability and energy-efficient supply chain management: A review of research trends and proposed guidelines. Energies 2018, 11, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Mastrocinque, E.; Ramírez, F.J.; Honrubia-Escribano, A.; Pham, D.T. An AHP-based multi-criteria model for sustainable supply chain development in the renewable energy sector. Expert Syst. Appl. 2020, 150, 113321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Haiyun, C.; Zhixiong, H.; Yüksel, S.; Dinçer, H. Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Grosvold, J.; Hoejmose, S.U.; Roehrich, J.K. Squaring the circle: Management, measurement and performance of sustainability in supply chains. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2014, 19, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gawusu, S.; Zhang, X.; Jamatutu, S.A.; Ahmed, A.; Amadu, A.A.; Djam Miensah, E. The dynamics of green supply chain management within the framework of renewable energy. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 684–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Halldorsson, A.; Svanberg, M. Energy resources: Trajectories for supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2013, 18, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Vance, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Hartley, D. Data Analytics for Enhancement of Forest and Biomass Supply Chain Management. Curr. For. Rep. 2020, 6, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cucchiella, F.; D’Adamo, I. Issue on supply chain of renewable energy. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 76, 774–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vance, L.; Cabezas, H.; Heckl, I.; Bertok, B.; Friedler, F. Synthesis of sustainable energy supply chain by the P-graph framework. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 52, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Appolloni, A.; D’Adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Yazdani, M.; Settembre-Blundo, D. Reflective backward analysis to assess the operational performance and eco-efficiency of two industrial districts. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bouazzaoui, M.; Wu, H.J.; Roehrich, J.K.; Squire, B.; Roath, A.S. Justice in inter-organizational relationships: A literature review and future research agenda. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 87, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saghaei, M.; Ghaderi, H.; Soleimani, H. Design and optimization of biomass electricity supply chain with uncertainty in material quality, availability and market demand. Energy 2020, 197, 117165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rahemi, H.; Torabi, S.A.; Avami, A.; Jolai, F. Bioethanol supply chain network design considering land characteristics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 119, 109517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Perić, M.; Antonijević, D.; Komatina, M.; Bugarski, B.; Rakin, M. Life cycle assessment of wood chips supply chain in Serbia. Renew. Energy 2020, 155, 1302–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nunes, L.J.; Causer, T.P.; Ciolkosz, D. Biomass for energy: A review on supply chain management models. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 120, 109658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Murele, O.C.; Zulkafli, N.I.; Kopanos, G.; Hart, P.; Hanak, D.P. Integrating biomass into energy supply chain networks. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lo, S.L.; How, B.S.; Leong, W.D.; Teng, S.Y.; Rhamdhani, M.A.; Sunarso, J. Techno-economic analysis for biomass supply chain: A state-of-the-art review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 135, 110164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kc, R.; Aalto, M.; Korpinen, O.J.; Ranta, T.; Proskurina, S. Lifecycle Assessment of Biomass Supply Chain with the Assistance of Agent-Based Modelling. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kang, S.; Heo, S.; Realff, M.J.; Lee, J.H. Three-stage design of high-resolution microalgae-based biofuel supply chain using geographic information system. Appl. Energy 2020, 265, 114773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gilani, H.; Sahebi, H.; Oliveira, F. Sustainable sugarcane-to-bioethanol supply chain network design: A robust possibilistic programming model. Appl. Energy 2020, 278, 115653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Garofalo, P.; Mastrorilli, M.; Ventrella, D.; Vonella, A.V.; Campi, P. Modelling the suitability of energy crops through a fuzzy-based system approach: The case of sugar beet in the bioethanol supply chain. Energy 2020, 196, 117160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fattahi, M.; Govindan, K.; Farhadkhani, M. Sustainable supply chain planning for biomass-based power generation with environmental risk and supply uncertainty considerations: A real-life case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 3084–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Esmaeili, S.A.H.; Szmerekovsky, J.; Sobhani, A.; Dybing, A.; Peterson, T.O. Sustainable biomass supply chain network design with biomass switching incentives for first-generation bioethanol producers. Energy Policy 2020, 138, 111222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Durmaz, Y.G.; Bilgen, B. Multi-objective optimization of sustainable biomass supply chain network design. Appl. Energy 2020, 272, 115259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aziz, N.I.H.A.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Gheewala, S.H.; Ismail, H. Bioenergy for a Cleaner Future: A Case Study of Sustainable Biogas Supply Chain in the Malaysian Energy Sector. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Aseffe, J.A.M.; González, A.M.; Jaén, R.L.; Lora, E.E.S. The corn cob gasification-based renewable energy recovery in the life cycle environmental performance of seed-corn supply chain: An Ecuadorian case study. Renew. Energy 2020, 163, 1523–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sarker, B.R.; Wu, B.; Paudel, K.P. Modeling and optimization of a supply chain of renewable biomass and biogas: Processing plant location. Appl. Energy 2019, 239, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sadeghi, J.; Haapala, K.R. Optimizing a sustainable logistics problem in a renewable energy network using a genetic algorithm. OPSEARCH 2019, 56, 73–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nugroho, Y.K.; Zhu, L. Platforms planning and process optimization for biofuels supply chain. Renew. Energy 2019, 140, 563–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ling, W.C.; Verasingham, A.B.; Andiappan, V.; Wan, Y.K.; Chew, I.M.; Ng, D.K. An integrated mathematical optimisation approach to synthesise and analyse a bioelectricity supply chain network. Energy 2019, 178, 554–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Leong, H.; Leong, H.; Foo, D.C.; Ng, L.Y.; Andiappan, V. Hybrid approach for carbon-constrained planning of bioenergy supply chain network. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 18, 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gumte, K.M.; Mitra, K. Bio-Supply Chain Network Design to tackle ethanol deficiency in India: A mathematical framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 234, 208–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Díaz-Trujillo, L.A.; Nápoles-Rivera, F. Optimization of biogas supply chain in Mexico considering economic and environmental aspects. Renew. Energy 2019, 139, 1227–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Agustina, F.; Vanany, I.; Siswanto, N. Biomass Supply Chain Design, Planning and Management: A Review of Literature. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok, Thailand, 16–19 December 2018; pp. 884–888. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bragado, M.V.; Broz, D.; Dondo, R. Design and optimization of a supply chain for cogeneration of electrical and thermal energy from forest biomass. In Proceedings of the Simposio Argentino de Informática Industrial e Investigación Operativa SIIO 2018—47 Jornadas Argentinas de Informática JAIIO 2018, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5–7 September 2018; pp. 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zahraee, S.M.; Golroudbary, S.R.; Shiwakoti, N.; Kraslawski, A.; Stasinopoulos, P. An investigation of the environmental sustainability of palm biomass supply chains via dynamic simulation modeling: A case of Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Acuna, M.; Sessions, J.; Zamora, R.; Boston, K.; Brown, M.; Ghaffariyan, M.R. Methods to Manage and Optimize Forest Biomass Supply Chains: A Review. Curr. For. Rep. 2019, 5, 124–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yokoi, Y.; Furubayashi, T.; Nakata, T.; Kasai, H.; Ochi, Y. Multifaceted analysis and integrated design for global supply chain of empty fruit bunch. Eur. Biomass Conf. Exhib. Proc. 2018, 2018, 855–866. [Google Scholar]
  60. Svanberg, M.; Finnsgård, C.; Flodén, J.; Lundgren, J. Analyzing animal waste-to-energy supply chains: The case of horse manure. Renew. Energy 2018, 129, 830–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Karimi, H. Optimization Models for Sustainable Design and Management of Biopower Supply Chains; Clemson University: Clemson, SC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  62. Gebresenbet, G.; Bosona, T.; Olsson, S.-O.; Garcia, D. Smart System for the optimization of logistics performance of the pruning biomass value chain. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Roni, M.S.; Eksioglu, S.D.; Cafferty, K.G.; Jacobson, J.J. A multi-objective, hub-and-spoke model to design and manage biofuel supply chains. Ann. Oper. Res. 2017, 249, 351–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Poudel, S.R. Models and Algorithms to Solve a Reliable and Congested Biomass Supply Chain Network Designing Problem under Uncertainty; Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  65. Chavez, H.; Castillo-Villar, K.K.; Webb, E. Development of the IBSAL-SimMOpt Method for the Optimization of Quality in a Corn Stover Supply Chain. Energies 2017, 10, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Yue, D. Multi-Scale Optimization of Biomass-to-Bioenergy Supply Chains; Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  67. Lin, T.; Rodríguez, L.F.; Davis, S.; Khanna, M.; Shastri, Y.; Grift, T.; Long, S.; Ting, K. Biomass feedstock preprocessing and long-distance transportation logistics. Gcb Bioenergy 2016, 8, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Korpinen, O.J.; Venäläinen, P.; Aalto, M.; Ranta, T. Advanced solutions for biomass transportation by road—How to evaluate their performance? In Proceedings of the 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 6–9 June 2016; pp. 1681–1685. [Google Scholar]
  69. Balaman, Ş.Y.; Selim, H. Sustainable design of renewable energy supply chains integrated with district heating systems: A fuzzy optimization approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 133, 863–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hong, B.H.; Lam, H.L. Novel approach for integrated biomass supply chain. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2015, 45, 475–480. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hartley, D.S. Modeling and Optimization of Woody Biomass Harvest and Logistics in the Northeastern United States; West Virginia University: Morgantown, WV, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  72. Balaman, Ş.Y.; Selim, H. A network design model for biomass to energy supply chains with anaerobic digestion systems. Appl. Energy 2014, 130, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Svanberg, M.; Halldórsson, Á. Supply chain configuration for biomass-to-energy: The case of torrefaction. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2013, 7, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sharma, B.; Ingalls, R.G.; Jones, C.L.; Khanchi, A. Biomass supply chain design and analysis: Basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 24, 608–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Martinez-Kawas, A. A Feasibility Study of Postharvest Handling, Storage and Logistics of Bioenergy Crops; Kansas State University: Manhattan, KS, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  76. Kazemzadeh, N.; Hu, G. Optimization models for biorefinery supply chain network design under uncertainty. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2013, 5, 053125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Karttunen, K.; Väätäinen, K.; Asikainen, A.; Ranta, T. The operational efficiency of waterway transport of forest chips on Finland’s Lake Saimaa. Silva Fenn. 2012, 3, 395–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Tahvanainen, T.; Anttila, P. Supply chain cost analysis of long-distance transportation of energy wood in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 3360–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Palander, T. Modelling renewable supply chain for electricity generation with forest, fossil, and wood-waste fuels. Energy 2011, 36, 5984–5993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gold, S.; Seuring, S. Supply chain and logistics issues of bio-energy production. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dunnett, A. Spatially Explicit Modelling and Optimisation of Bioenergy Supply—Chain Infrastructures; Imperial College London: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  82. Bowling, I.M.; Ponce-Ortega, J.M.; El-Halwagi, M.M. Facility location and supply chain optimization for a biorefinery. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 6276–6286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Velazquez-Marti, B.; Fernandez-Gonzalez, E. Mathematical algorithms to locate factories to transform biomass in bioenergy focused on logistic network construction. Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 2136–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Van Dyken, S.; Bakken, B.H.; Skjelbred, H.I. Linear mixed-integer models for biomass supply chains with transport, storage and processing. Energy 2010, 35, 1338–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Acharya, A.M. Biomass-to-Biofuels’ Supply Chain Design and Management; Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  86. Kouvelis, P.; Matsuo, H.; Xiao, Y.; Yuan, Q. Long-Term Service Agreement in Electricity Supply Chain with Renewable Energy Penetration; Elsevier Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2020; SSRN 3433943. [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhao, W.; Bao, X.; Yuan, G.; Wang, X.; Bao, H. The Equilibrium Model for the Coexistence of Renewable Portfolio Standards and Emissions Trading: The Supply Chain Analysis. Energies 2019, 12, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Khan, S.A.R.; Zhang, Y.; Anees, M.; Golpîra, H.; Lahmar, A.; Qianli, D. Green supply chain management, economic growth and environment: A GMM based evidence. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yu, Z.; Golpîra, H.; Khan, S. The relationship between green supply chain performance, energy demand, economic growth and environmental sustainability: An empirical evidence from developed countries. LogForum 2018, 14, 479–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Badea, A.; Prostean, G.; Tamasila, M.; Taucean, I.M. Conceptual Model In Supply Chain Collaboration For Renewable Energy Resources Projects. In Proceedings of the 5th International Management Conference, Politehnica University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania, 25–27 May 2016; pp. 66–73. [Google Scholar]
  91. Pietrosemoli, L.; Monroy, C.R. The impact of sustainable construction and knowledge management on sustainability goals. A review of the Venezuelan renewable energy sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Aslani, A.; Mohaghar, A. Business structure in renewable energy industry: Key areas. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Delucchi, M.A.; Jacobson, M.Z. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 1170–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lam, H.L.; Varbanov, P.S.; Klemeš, J.J. Optimisation of regional energy supply chains utilising renewables: P-graph approach. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2010, 34, 782–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Herrera, M.M.; Uriona, M.; Dyner, I. Dynamics performance of the wind-power supply chain with transmission capacity constraints. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2020, 10, 1142–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Irawan, C.A.; Akbari, N.; Jones, D.F.; Menachof, D. A combined supply chain optimisation model for the installation phase of offshore wind projects. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 1189–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Poulsen, T.; Lema, R. Is the supply chain ready for the green transformation? The case of offshore wind logistics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 758–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shafiee, M. Maintenance logistics organization for offshore wind energy: Current progress and future perspectives. Renew. Energy 2015, 77, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Vojdani, N.; Lootz, F. Designing supply chain networks for the offshore wind energy industry. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model. 2012, 4, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lange, K.; Rinne, A.; Haasis, H.-D. Planning maritime logistics concepts for offshore wind farms: A newly developed decision support system. In International Conference on Computational Logistics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 142–158. [Google Scholar]
  101. Scholz-Reiter, B.; Lütjen, M.; Heger, J.; Schweizer, A. Planning and control of logistics for offshore wind farms. In Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS International Conference on Mathematical and Computational Methods in Science and Engineering, Faro, Portugal, 3–5 November 2010; pp. 242–247. [Google Scholar]
  102. Alstone, P. Connections beyond the Margins of the Power Grid: Information Technology and the Evolution of Off-Grid Solar Electricity in the Developing World; University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  103. Batidzirai, B.; Junginger, M.; Klemm, M.; Schipfer, F.; Thrän, D. Biomass Supply and Trade Opportunities of Preprocessed Biomass for Power Generation. In Developing the Global Bioeconomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 91–114. [Google Scholar]
  104. Foo, D.C.; Tan, R.R.; Lam, H.L.; Aziz, M.K.A.; Klemeš, J.J. Robust models for the synthesis of flexible palm oil-based regional bioenergy supply chain. Energy 2013, 55, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hensel, N.D. Economic challenges in the clean energy supply chain: The market for rare earth minerals and other critical inputs. Bus. Econ. 2011, 46, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, Y.; Bao, X.; Ren, G.; Cai, X.; Li, J. Analysing the status, obstacles and recommendations for WCOs of restaurants as biodiesel feedstocks in China from supply chain’perspectives. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 60, 20–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Besha, P. National, Regional and Sectoral Innovation Systems in China: General Overview and Case Studies of Renewable Energy and Space Technology Sectors. Ph.D. Thesis, The George Washington University, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  108. Lefevre-Marton, N. Catching up: The Rise of the Chinese Wind Turbine Industry; Princeton University: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  109. Yadav, Y.S.; Yadav, Y. Biomass Supply Chain Management: Perspectives and Challenges. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Recent Advances in Bioenergy Research; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 267–281. [Google Scholar]
  110. Shahbazbegian, V.; Hosseini-Motlagh, S.-M.; Haeri, A. Integrated forward/reverse logistics thin-film photovoltaic power plant supply chain network design with uncertain data. Appl. Energy 2020, 277, 115538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Manouchehrabadi, M.K.; Yaghoubi, S.; Tajik, J. Optimal scenarios for solar cell supply chain considering degradation in powerhouses. Renew. Energy 2020, 145, 1104–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dehghani, E.; Jabalameli, M.S.; Naderi, M.J.; Safari, A. An environmentally conscious photovoltaic supply chain network design under correlated uncertainty: A case study in Iran. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 262, 121434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ishii, K.; Furuichi, T.; Fujiyama, A.; Watanabe, S. Logistics cost analysis of rice straw pellets for feasible production capacity and spatial scale in heat utilization systems: A case study in Nanporo town, Hokkaido, Japan. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 94, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Choo, Y.M.; Muhamad, H.; Hashim, Z.; Subramaniam, V.; Puah, C.W.; Tan, Y. Determination of GHG contributions by subsystems in the oil palm supply chain using the LCA approach. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2011, 16, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hassan, M.N.A. Ghg Emissions and Costs of Developing Biomass Energy in Malaysia: Implications on Energy Security in the Transportation and Electricity Sector. Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  116. Lam, H.L.; Ng, W.P.; Ng, R.T.; Ng, E.H.; Aziz, M.K.A.; Ng, D.K. Green strategy for sustainable waste-to-energy supply chain. Energy 2013, 57, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Umar, M.S.; Jennings, P.; Urmee, T. Strengthening the palm oil biomass renewable energy industry in Malaysia. Renew. Energy 2013, 60, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Bujang, B.; Safuan, A. Utilization of Durian Biomass for Biorenewable Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  119. Shaharudin, M.S.; Fernando, Y. Low carbon footprint: The supply chain agenda in Malaysian manufacturing firms. In Promoting Sustainable Practices through Energy Engineering and Asset Management; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2015; pp. 324–347. [Google Scholar]
  120. Amer, M. Extending Technology Roadmap through Fuzzy Cognitive Map-Based Scenarios: The Case of the Wind Energy Sector of Pakistan. 2013. Available online: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/999/ (accessed on 29 March 2022).
  121. Mun, K.G. Designing Energy and Water Supply Chains for Prosperity; Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick: New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  122. Seo, S.-K.; Yun, D.-Y.; Lee, C.-J. Design and optimization of a hydrogen supply chain using a centralized storage model. Appl. Energy 2020, 262, 114452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Manakit, P. Optimal Utilization of Biomass Feedstocks: A Case Study Based on Rice and Sugar Mills in Thailand; University of Surrey: Guildford, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  124. Sikkema, R.; Junginger, M.; Pichler, W.; Hayes, S.; Faaij, A.P. The international logistics of wood pellets for heating and power production in Europe: Costs, energy-input and greenhouse gas balances of pellet consumption in Italy, Sweden and the Netherlands. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2010, 4, 132–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Marinelli, A.; Fagarazzi, C.; Tirinnanzi, A. Evaluation of the economic, environmental and territorial effects of some biomassenergy chain in Tuscany. Riv. Studi Sulla Sostenibilita 2012, 13–31. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287601103_Evaluation_of_the_economic_environmental_and_territorial_effects_of_some_biomassenergy_chain_in_Tuscany (accessed on 29 March 2022).
  126. Monforti, F.; Bódis, K.; Scarlat, N.; Dallemand, J.-F. The possible contribution of agricultural crop residues to renewable energy targets in Europe: A spatially explicit study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 19, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. López, E.; Jirjis, R.; Anerud, E.; Kern, J.; Idler, C.; Sebastián, F.; Germer, S. Recommendations for management of large scale storage of wood prunings to avoid quality changes. In Proceedings of the 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 6–9 June 2016; pp. 580–586. [Google Scholar]
  128. García-Galindo, D.; Gómez-Palmero, M.; López, E.; Sebastián, F.; Jirjis, R.; Gebresenbet, G.; Germer, S.; Pari, L.; Suardi, A.; Lapeña, A.; et al. Agricultural pruning harvesting demonstrations in Germany, France and Spain. Lessons learned and recommendations. In Proceedings of the European Biomass Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 6–9 June 2016; pp. 1727–1733. [Google Scholar]
  129. Arranz-Piera, P.; Horta, F.; Kies, U.; Hagemann, H.; Reumerman, P.; Fallas, Y.; Obersteiner, G.; Velo, E. SME entrepreneurship in the solid biomass sector: First results of the “securechain” project (HORIZON2020). In Proceedings of the European Biomass Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 6–9 June 2016; pp. 1666–1670. [Google Scholar]
  130. Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š.; Kumer, P.; Glavonjić, P.; Nonić, D.; Nedeljković, J.; Kisin, B.; Avdibegović, M. Different organizational models of private forest owners as a possibility to increase wood mobilization in Slovenia and Serbia. Croat. J. For. Eng. J. Theory Appl. For. Eng. 2017, 38, 127–140. [Google Scholar]
  131. Garcia, C.A.; Hora, G. State-of-the-art of waste wood supply chain in Germany and selected European countries. Waste Manag. 2017, 70, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Korpinen, O.-J.; Aalto, M.; Virkkunen, M.; Raitila, J.; Ranta, T. Simulation-Based Assessment of the Properties and Performance of a Biomass Terminal. In Proceedings of the 25th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, EUBCE 2017, Stockholm, Sweden, 12–15 June 2017; pp. 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  133. Kanzian, C.; Kühmaier, M. Regional energy wood logistics-optimal locations and catchment areas for storage. Austrian J. For. Sci. 2017, 134, 201–223. [Google Scholar]
  134. Koch, C.; Baluku, J.; Habakurama, I.I.; Mathern, A. The challenges of building inner sea offshore wind farms-the cases of Lillgrund and Anholt. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 13–14 June 2017; p. 307. [Google Scholar]
  135. Sambra, A.; Sorensen, C.; Kristensen, E.F. Optimized harvest and logistics for biomass supply chain. In Proceedings of the 16th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Valencia, Spain, 2–6 June 2008. [Google Scholar]
  136. Karttunen, K.; Lättilä, L.; Korpinen, O.-J.; Ranta, T. Cost-efficiency of intermodal container supply chain for forest chips. Silva Fenn. 2013, 47, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Tuominen, R.; Seppänen, T.; Soininen, H.; Karhu, H.; Tirkkonen, H.; Föhr, J.; Ranta, T. Demonstration tests on horse manure in order to strengthen the economic life of the south savo region. In Proceedings of the 26th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition Proceedings, Copenhagen, Denmark, 14–17 May 2018; pp. 339–341. [Google Scholar]
  138. Annevelink, E.; Staritsky, I.; Vanmeulebrouk, B.; Elbersen, B.; Gabrielle, B. LocaGIStics: Design & evaluation of regional biomass delivery chains. In Proceedings of the 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherland, 6–9 June 2016; pp. 174–175. [Google Scholar]
  139. Richter, A.; van der Laan, E.; Ketter, W.; Valogianni, L. Transitioning from the traditional to the smart grid: Lessons learned from closed-loop supply chains. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Smart Grid Technology, Economics and Policies (SG-TEP), Nuremberg, Germany, 3–4 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
  140. Reuß, M.; Grube, T.; Robinius, M.; Stolten, D. A hydrogen supply chain with spatial resolution: Comparative analysis of infrastructure technologies in Germany. Appl. Energy 2019, 247, 438–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sosa, A.; Acuna, M.; McDonnell, K.; Devlin, G. Controlling moisture content and truck configurations to model and optimise biomass supply chain logistics in Ireland. Appl. Energy 2015, 137, 338–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Gnoni, M.; Elia, V.; Lettera, G. A strategic quantitative approach for sustainable energy production from biomass. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2011, 4, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Dal-Mas, M.; Giarola, S.; Zamboni, A.; Bezzo, F. Strategic design and investment capacity planning of the ethanol supply chain under price uncertainty. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 2059–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Pari, L.; Brambilla, M.; Civitarese, V.; Bisaglia, C. Preliminary evaluation of a short rotation forestry poplar biomass supply chain in Emilia Romagna Region. J. Agric. Eng. 2013, 44, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Pantaleo, A.; De Gennaro, B.; Shah, N. Assessment of optimal size of anaerobic co-digestion plants: An application to cattle farms in the province of Bari (Italy). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 20, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Cannemi, M.; García-Melón, M.; Aragonés-Beltrán, P.; Gómez-Navarro, T. Modeling decision making as a support tool for policy making on renewable energy development. Energy Policy 2014, 67, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Serrano, A.; Faulin, J.; Astiz, P.; Sánchez, M.; Belloso, J. Locating and designing a biorefinery supply chain under uncertainty in Navarre: A stochastic facility location problem case. Transp. Res. Procedia 2015, 10, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Pari, L.; Suardi, A.; Scarfone, A.; Acampora, A.; Frackowiak, P.; Adamczyk, F.; Santangelo, E. Harvesting of almond (Prunus dulcis, Mill.) pruning in Spain using a new chipper prototype. In Proceedings of the 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 6–9 June 2016; pp. 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  149. Annevelink, B.; Galindo, D.G.; Espatolero, S.; Staritsky, I.; Vanmeulebrouk, B. Logistical case study for the AragÓn region using the locagistics tool. Eur. Biomass Conf. Exhib. Proc. 2017, 2017, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  150. Jeong, J.S.; Ramírez-Gómez, Á. Optimizing the location of a biomass plant with a fuzzy-DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (F-DEMATEL) and multi-criteria spatial decision assessment for renewable energy management and long-term sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 182, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Abad, A.V.; Cherrett, T.; Holdsworth, P. Waste-to-fuel opportunities for British quick service restaurants: A case study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 104, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Yu, M. An Approach to Optimise Biofuel Supply Chain with Focus on the United Kingdom; University of Surrey: Guildford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  153. Khan, S.A.R.; Qianli, D. Does national scale economic and environmental indicators spur logistics performance? Evidence from UK. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 26692–26705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Alam, M. Modeling the Woody Biomass Supply Chain for Energy Production in Northwestern Ontario. Ph.D. Thesis, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  155. Shabani, N.; Sowlati, T. A mixed integer non-linear programming model for tactical value chain optimization of a wood biomass power plant. Appl. Energy 2013, 104, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Calvert, K. Geographies of Biomass and Solar Energy: Spatial Decision Support for Regional Energy Sustainability; Queen’s University: Kingston, ON, Canada, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  157. Chávez, H.; Castillo-Villar, K.K.; Webb, E. Simulation-based approach for the optimization of a biofuel supply chain. In Proceedings of the IIE Annual Conference Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 20–23 May 2017; 2017; pp. 271–276. [Google Scholar]
  158. Weldu, Y.W. Accounting for Human Health and Ecosystems Quality in Developing Sustainable Energy Products: The Implications of Wood Biomass-based Electricity Strategies to Climate Change Mitigation; University of Calgary: Calgary, AB, Canada, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  159. Dhanju, A. Four Essays on Offshore Wind Power Potential, Development, Regulatory Framework, and Integration; University of Delaware: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  160. Brathwaite, N.H. A perfect Storm: How Biorenewables Scientists are Reading Kairos, Exercising Agency, and Locating a New Scientific Ethos that Supports Public Engagement; Iowa State University: Ames, IA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  161. Parker, N.; Fan, Y.; Ogden, J. From waste to hydrogen: An optimal design of energy production and distribution network. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2010, 46, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Jessup, R.W. Development and status of dedicated energy crops in the United States. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. -Plant 2009, 45, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tun-Hsiang, E.Y.; Larson, J.A.; English, B.C.; Gao, Y. Evaluating the Optimal Logistics System of Biomass Feedstocks for a Biorefinery with Alternative Harvest, Storage and Preprocessing Options: A Case Study of East Tennessee. In Proceedings of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Louisville, KY, USA, 7–10 August 2011; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  164. An, H. Optimization and Simulation for Designing the Supply Chain of the Cellulosic Biofuel Industry; Texas A&M University: College Station, TX, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  165. Han, S.-K. Managing Woody Biomass Transportation for Improved Biomass Economics; Oregon State University: Corvallis, OR, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  166. Parker, N.C. Modeling Future Biofuel Supply Chains Using Spatially Explicit Infrastructure Optimization; University of California: Davis, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  167. Vimmerstedt, L.J.; Bush, B.; Peterson, S. Ethanol distribution, dispensing, and use: Analysis of a portion of the biomass-to-biofuels supply chain using system dynamics. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. de Bourgeois, W. Developing an Action Research Framework of Profit Sustainability in an Alternative Energy Economy Assessing the Business Models of Domestic and Global Energy Markets; D.B.A. Argosy University/Seattle: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  169. Okwo, A. Next-Generation Biofuels: The Supply Chain Approach to Estimating Potential Land-Use Change. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  170. Sharma, B. Scenario Optimization Approach for Designing Biomass Supply Chain; Oklahoma State University: Stillwater, OK, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  171. Zhang, J.; Osmani, A.; Awudu, I.; Gonela, V. An integrated optimization model for switchgrass-based bioethanol supply chain. Appl. Energy 2013, 102, 1205–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Leahy, J.; Lindenfeld, L. Linking knowledge with action: Applied social science considerations to improve woody bioenergy research and development effectiveness. In Wood-Based Energy in the Northern Forests; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 219–227. [Google Scholar]
  173. Awudu, I.K. Modeling and Optimization of Biofuel Supply Chain Considering Uncertainties, Hedging Strategies, and Sustainability Concepts. Ph.D. Thesis, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  174. Bai, Y. Integrated Supply Chain Design for Sustainable and Resilient Development of Biofuel Production; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Urbana, IL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  175. Emery, I.R. Direct and Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Biomass Storage: Implications for Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels; Purdue University: West Lafayette, IN, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  176. Lin, T. Systems Informatics and Analysis for Optimization of Biomass Feedstock Provision; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Champaign, IL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  177. Shah, A. Techno-Economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of the Corn Stover Biomass Feedstock Supply Chain System for a Midwest-based First-Generation Cellulosic Biorefinery; Iowa State University: Ames, IA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  178. Argo, A.M.; Tan, E.C.; Inman, D.; Langholtz, M.H.; Eaton, L.M.; Jacobson, J.J.; Wright, C.T.; Muth, D.J., Jr.; Wu, M.M.; Chiu, Y.W. Investigation of biochemical biorefinery sizing and environmental sustainability impacts for conventional bale system and advanced uniform biomass logistics designs. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2013, 7, 282–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Osmani, A.; Zhang, J. Optimal grid design and logistic planning for wind and biomass based renewable electricity supply chains under uncertainties. Energy 2014, 70, 514–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Tallaksen, J.; Kush, T.S. A case study in planning a renewable energy supply chain: Part i comparing biomass processes, costs and logistics. In Proceedings of the 2014 35th International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management-Entrepreneurship Engineering: Harnessing Innovation, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, 15–18 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  181. Tallaksen, J.; Kush, T.S. A case study in planning a renewable energy supply chain: Part ii using life cycle environmental metrics to select a biomass feedstock. In Proceedings of the 2014 35th International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management-Entrepreneurship Engineering: Harnessing Innovation, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, 15–18 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  182. Aitken, M.L. Wind Turbine Wake Characterization with Remote Sensing and Computational Fluid Dynamics; University of Colorado at Boulder: Boulder, CO, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  183. Jenkins, T.L. Size Optimization of a Biomass to Liquid Fuel Conversion Facility Within a Biomass Supply Chain. Master’s Thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  184. Marufuzzaman, M. Models for a Carbon Constrained, Reliable Biofuel Supply Chain Network Design and Management; Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  185. Memisoglu, G. Bio-energy Logistics Network Design Under Price-Based Supply and Yield Uncertainty; Texas A&M University: College Station, TX, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  186. Zhang, F. Development of an Optimization Model for Biofuel Facility Size and Location and a Simulation Model for Design of a Biofuel Supply Chain; Michigan Technological University: Houghton, MI, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  187. Lee, J.H. Energy supply planning and supply chain optimization under uncertainty. J. Process Control 2014, 24, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Osmani, A.; Zhang, J. Economic and environmental optimization of a large scale sustainable dual feedstock lignocellulosic-based bioethanol supply chain in a stochastic environment. Appl. Energy 2014, 114, 572–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Caffrey, K.R. A Comparison of Alternative Bioenergy Logistical Operations in North Carolina; North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  190. Field, J.L. Towards the Systematic Identification of Low-Cost Ecosystem-Mediated Carbon Sequestration Opportunities in Bioenergy Supply Chains; Colorado State University: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  191. Tong, W. Conceptual Design of Wind Farms through Novel Multi-Objective Swarm Optimization; Syracuse University: Syracuse, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  192. Zhang, L. Biofuel Supply Chain, Market, and Policy Analysis; Iowa State University: Ames, IA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  193. Angelis, S. A Simulation Model for Optimizing Biofuel Distribution Network; New Mexico State University: Las Cruces, NM, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  194. Campbell, R.M. Evaluation of Social Preferences for Woody Biomass Energy in the US Mountain West; University of Montana: Missoula, MT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  195. Chen, M. Strategies for the Scale-up of the US Cellulosic Biofuels Industry: Integrated Biorefinery & Buyer-Supplier Relationships; Pennsylvania State University: State College, PA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  196. Pokharel, R. Utilization of Woody Residues to Produce Bioenergy by Primary Forest Products Manufacturers in the Southern UNITED States; Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  197. Reyes, G. Optimization of Biofuel Distribution Networks in the Southwestern United States; New Mexico State University: Las Cruces, NM, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  198. Beach, R.H.; Zhang, Y.W.; McCarl, B.A. Modeling Bioenergy, Land Use, and GHG Mitigation with FASOMGHG: Implications of Storage Costs and Carbon Policy. In Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy: Volume II; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 239–271. [Google Scholar]
  199. Mooney, D.F. Ex-Ante Analysis of a Novel Production Practice: Three Essays on Land Supply for Bioenergy Cropping Systems; The University of Wisconsin-Madison: Madison, WI, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  200. Seel, J. Socio-economic and Engineering Assessments of Renewable Energy Cost Reduction Potential; University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  201. Sampat, A.M.; Ruiz-Mercado, G.J.; Zavala, V.M. Economic and Environmental Analysis for Advancing Sustainable Management of Livestock Waste: A Wisconsin Case Study. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 6018–6031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Li, Y. Investment Decision-Making in Clean Energy under Uncertainties: A Real Options Approach; Iowa State University: Ames, IA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  203. Ozkan, D. Financial Analysis and Cost Optimization of Offshore Wind Energy under Uncertainty and in Deregulated Power Markets; The George Washington University: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  204. Ghaffariyan, M.R.; Brown, M.; Acuna, M.; McGrath, J. Optimised Harvesting Cost for Mallee Supply Chain in Western Australia. Croat. J. For. Eng. J. Theory Appl. For. Eng. 2016, 37, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  205. Rodríguez, M.A.; Alasino, N.; Vecchietti, A. Forest supply chain optimization applying generalized disjunctive programming. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 38, pp. 709–714. [Google Scholar]
  206. Bradshaw, A. Electricity Market Reforms and Renewable Energy: The Case of Wind and Solar in Brazil; Columbia University: Columbia, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  207. Barreto, C.M. Optimized Solar-Wind-Powered Drip Irrigation for Farming in Developing Countries; University of Massachusetts Lowell: Lowell, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  208. Chen, Z.; Su, S.-I.I. International competition and trade conflict in a dual photovoltaic supply chain system. Renew. Energy 2020, 151, 816–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Khalilpour, K.R.; Pace, R.; Karimi, F. Retrospective and prospective of the hydrogen supply chain: A longitudinal techno-historical analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 34294–34315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Li, L.; Manier, H.; Manier, M.-A. Hydrogen supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 103, 342–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Dagdougui, H.; Sacile, R.; Bersani, C.; Ouammi, A. Hydrogen Infrastructure for Energy Applications: Production, Storage, Distribution and Safety; Academic Press: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–156. [Google Scholar]
  212. Pham, A.; Jin, T.; Novoa, C.; Temponi, C. Integrating distributed and variable energy for production-inventory operations in prosumer economy. In Proceedings of the ILS 2018—Information Systems, Logistics and Supply Chain, Lyon, France, 8–11 July 2018; pp. 484–491. [Google Scholar]
  213. Bhattacharya, A. Optimal Energy Storage Strategies in Microgrids; University of Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  214. Jin, T.; Pham, A.; Novoa, C.; Temponi, C. A zero-carbon supply chain model: Minimising levelised cost of onsite renewable generation. Supply Chain. Forum Int. J. 2017, 18, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The Dataset Processing Phases.
Figure 1. The Dataset Processing Phases.
Sustainability 14 07290 g001
Figure 2. The classification of publications according to their types.
Figure 2. The classification of publications according to their types.
Sustainability 14 07290 g002
Figure 3. The classification of publications according to their publishing time.
Figure 3. The classification of publications according to their publishing time.
Sustainability 14 07290 g003
Figure 4. The distribution of published literature according to their main research area.
Figure 4. The distribution of published literature according to their main research area.
Sustainability 14 07290 g004
Figure 5. The numbers of published literature according to their topics and associated categories.
Figure 5. The numbers of published literature according to their topics and associated categories.
Sustainability 14 07290 g005
Figure 6. The regions are covered by published literature.
Figure 6. The regions are covered by published literature.
Sustainability 14 07290 g006
Figure 7. The top scientific journals with their contributions.
Figure 7. The top scientific journals with their contributions.
Sustainability 14 07290 g007
Figure 8. The coverage percentage of directions within the bioenergy and supply chain research area.
Figure 8. The coverage percentage of directions within the bioenergy and supply chain research area.
Sustainability 14 07290 g008
Figure 9. The coverage percentage of directions within renewables and supply chain research area.
Figure 9. The coverage percentage of directions within renewables and supply chain research area.
Sustainability 14 07290 g009
Figure 10. The coverage percentage of directions within the wind energy and supply chain research area.
Figure 10. The coverage percentage of directions within the wind energy and supply chain research area.
Sustainability 14 07290 g010
Table 1. The aggregated publications according to their scanned scientific databases.
Table 1. The aggregated publications according to their scanned scientific databases.
Scientific DatabasesNo. of Publications
Google Scholar131
Scopus91
ProQuest93
Web of Science63
Total378
Table 2. The aggregated publications without repetition.
Table 2. The aggregated publications without repetition.
378No. of Publications Repeated in One or More Scientific DatabasesNo. of Publications without Repetition
162525
Aggregate
publications from all databases
Google Scholar + Scopus + Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar + ScopusGoogle Scholar + Web of ScienceScopus + Web of Science330
Table 3. The classification of the key areas that connect bio-energy production and SCM and logistics activities.
Table 3. The classification of the key areas that connect bio-energy production and SCM and logistics activities.
Published WorksThe Main Research Areas Covered
Managing the Supply Chain of Biomass ProductsSupply Chain Simulation of BiomassBiomass Transportation ProblemsThe Smart Logistics System for Biomass Production
Zhang, X., et al. (2020) [28]
Saghaei, M., et al. (2020) [33]
Ramos-Hernández, R., et al. (2020) [7]
Rahemi, H., et al. (2020) [34]
Perić, M., et al. (2020) [35]
Nunes, L., et al. (2020) [36]
Murele, O.C., et al. (2020) [37]
Lo, S.L.Y., et al. (2020) [38]
Li, Y., et al. (2020) [16]
Kc, R., et al. (2020) [39]
Kang, S., et al. (2020) [40]
Gilani, H., et al. (2020) [41]
Garofalo, P., et al. (2020) [42]
Fattahi, M., et al. (2020) [43]
Esmaeili, S.A.H., et al. (2020) [44]
Durmaz, Y.G. and B. Bilgen (2020) [45]
Aziz, N.I.H.A., et al. (2020) [46]
Aseffe, J.A.M., et al. (2020) [47]
Sarker, B.R., et al. (2019) [48]
Sadeghi, J. and K.R. Haapala (2019) [49]
Nugroho, Y.K. and L. Zhu (2019) [50]
Ling, W.C., et al. (2019) [51]
Leong, H., et al. (2019) [52]
Gumte, K.M. and K. Mitra (2019) [53]
Díaz-Trujillo, L.A. and F. Nápoles-Rivera (2019) [54]
Agustina, F., et al. (2019) [55]
Bragado, M.V., D. Broz, and R. Dondo (2019) [56]
Zahraee, S.M., et al. (2019) [57]
Acuna, M., et al. (2019) [58]
Yokoi, Y., et al. (2018) [59]
Svanberg, M., et al. (2018) [60]
Karimi, H. (2018) [61]
Gebresenbet, G., et al. (2018) [62]
Roni, M.S., et al. (2017) [63]
Poudel, S.R. (2017) [64]
Chavez, H., et al. (2017) [65]
Yue, D. (2016) [66]
Lin, T., et al. (2016) [67]
Korpinen, O.J., et al. (2016) [68]
Balaman, Ş.Y. and H. Selim (2016) [69]
Hong, B.H. and H.L. Lam (2015) [70]
Hartley, D.S. (2014) [71]
Balaman, Ş.Y. and H. Selim (2014) [72]
Svanberg, M. and Á. Halldórsson (2013) [73]
Sharma, B., et al. (2013) [74]
Martinez-Kawas, A. (2013) [75]
Kazemzadeh, N. and G. Hu (2013) [76]
Karttunen, K., et al. (2012) [77]
Tahvanainen, T. and P. Anttila (2011) [78]
Palander, T. (2011) [79]
Gold, S. and S. Seuring (2011) [80]
Dunnett, A. (2011) [81]
Bowling, I.M., et al. (2011) [82]
Velazquez-Marti, B. and E. Fernandez-Gonzalez (2010) [83]
Van Dyken, S., et al. (2010) [84]
Acharya, A.M. (2010) [85]
Table 4. The key areas connect between renewables production in general and supply chain and logistics activities.
Table 4. The key areas connect between renewables production in general and supply chain and logistics activities.
Published WorksThe Main Research Areas Covered
Managing Renewable Energy Supply ChainPlanning the Renewable Energy SystemUsing Renewable Energy in Logistics Activities to be Green Logistics Operations
Kouvelis, P., et al. (2020) [86]
Zhao, W., et al. (2019) [87]
Azevedo, S.G., et al. (2019) [6]
Fontes, C.H.d.O. and F.G.M. Freires (2018) [1]
Khan, S.A.R., et al. (2018) [88]
Yu, Z., H. Golpîra, and S. Khan (2018) [89]
Badea, A., et al. (2016) [90]
Arent, D., et al. (2014) [3]
Pietrosemoli, L. and C.R. Monroy (2013) [91]
Hu, Y. and H. Cheng (2013) [5]
Cucchiella, F. and I. D’Adamo (2013) [29]
Aslani, A. and A. Mohaghar (2013) [92]
Wee, H.-M., et al. (2012) [9]
Delucchi, M.A. and M.Z. Jacobson (2011) [93]
Lam, H.L., et al. (2010) [94]
Table 5. The classification of the key areas that connect wind energy production and supply chain and logistics activities.
Table 5. The classification of the key areas that connect wind energy production and supply chain and logistics activities.
Published WorksThe Main Research Areas Covered
Supply Chain and Logistics of Wind EnergySupply Chain Simulation of Wind FarmsSupply Chain in the Installation of Wind ProjectsLogistics and Supply Chain Management for Maintenance of Wind Farms
Herrera, M.M., et al. (2020) [95]
Irawan, C.A., et al. (2018) [96]
Poulsen, T. and R. Lema (2017) [97]
Shafiee, M. (2015) [98]
Vojdani, N. and F. Lootz (2012) [99]
Lange, K., et al. (2012) [100]
Scholz-Reiter, B., et al. (2010) [101]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassanin, I.; Knez, M. Managing Supply Chain Activities in the Field of Energy Production Focusing on Renewables. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127290

AMA Style

Hassanin I, Knez M. Managing Supply Chain Activities in the Field of Energy Production Focusing on Renewables. Sustainability. 2022; 14(12):7290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127290

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassanin, Islam, and Matjaz Knez. 2022. "Managing Supply Chain Activities in the Field of Energy Production Focusing on Renewables" Sustainability 14, no. 12: 7290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop