Next Article in Journal
Effectiveness Study on Online or Blended Language Learning Based on Student Achievement: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Distribution of Sulfonamide Antibiotics and Resistance Genes and Their Correlation with Water Quality in Urban Rivers (Changchun City, China) in Autumn and Winter
Previous Article in Special Issue
Consumer Perspectives on Bio-Based Products and Brands—A Regional Finnish Social Study with Future Consumers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Regional Ecology Supporting Sustainable Development

1
School of Economics and Management, Shaanxi University of Science &Technology, Xi’an 712000, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(12), 7302; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127302
Submission received: 30 May 2022 / Revised: 8 June 2022 / Accepted: 12 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regional Ecology and Sustainability)

Abstract

:
Regional sustainable development is the primary goal of regional ecological research. Regional ecology aims to support sustainable development from an ecological perspective at the regional scale. In nearly half a century of the development of the discipline, regional ecology has developed into an essential branch of ecology. However, due to the complexity of regional ecosystems and ecological problems, regional ecology does not define clear research methods and research objects. This editorial sorts out the definition, research methods, and important research contents of regional ecology, including regional ecological security evaluation, regional sustainable development evaluation, regional resource analysis represented by water-food-energy relationship, and ecosystem service value evaluation.

1. The Definition of Regional Ecology

The definition of a region is different in geography, economics, and political science. From an ecological point of view, a region refers to a regional complex with a relatively complete ecological structure, ecological process, and ecological function formed by ecological media [1]. Regional ecology is an essential subject in the ecological subject system. The discipline arose from the discovery of spatial scale in ecology in the 1970s, which made the regionality of ecological problems arouse the attention of scholars [2]. So far, regional ecology has developed for nearly half a century. In a narrow sense, regional ecology studies the ecological structure, process, and function within a region and the coupling and interaction mechanism of ecological elements between regions [3]. In a broad sense, regional ecology is a branch of ecology. It is a practice-oriented discipline aimed at solving regional ecological environment problems, improving the service function of the regional ecosystem, realizing regional ecological integrity, ecological civilization, and sustainable development using multidisciplinary approaches such as ecology, geography, environmental science, and social sciences [3].

2. Research Methods of Regional Ecology

When solving ecological problems at different scales, scholars adopt a wide range of different tools. Based on controls, manipulation, randomization, and independent replication, classical experimental methods often draw causal inferences with data significance. However, when operating and replicating at large spatial scales (i.e., ecosystem scales), classical experimental methods show dubious characteristics, such as the fact that they are time-consuming and costly; moreover, they can overlook the effects of random events, and their manipulations may interfere with nature. With the increase of the experiment’s spatiotemporal scope, the effectiveness of the classical experimental method diminishes. Regional ecology often adopts methods between descriptive analysis and natural experiments, which are quasi-experiments, and treating time and space as control variables in experiments. Pseudo-repetitions may exist in quasi-natural experiments, but this approach is still believed to be encouraged for regional ecological research [4]. Besides, the geographic information system technology provides a technical bridge for linking the ecological process between regions and other scales (i.e., local scales). The application of spatial information technology and mathematical model helps couple the interaction between elements in the region and illustrate the dynamic process of ecological phenomenology.
Regional ecology has not yet established a complete theoretical system and methodology. The research on regional ecology is mainly to systematically analyze the characteristics and changes of regional ecological structure, process, and function through 4S technology, mathematical models, and other cross-disciplinary methods. It is worth noting that the remote sensing data and the field measured data should be combined in ecological research. Otherwise, the remote sensing data will not have ecological significance.

3. Research Hotspots of Regional Ecology

3.1. Regional Ecological Security

In a broad sense, ecological security is a composite artificial ecological system formed by natural, economic, and social security, and it refers to a state in which human life, health, basic rights, sources of safety and necessary life resources, social order, and human ability to adapt to environmental changes are not threatened [5]. In a narrow sense, it refers to the security of semi-natural and natural ecosystems, in other words, the integrity and health of ecosystems [6]. Recent regional ecological security studies mainly focus on aspects of assessing ecosystem changes according to pollutants’ concentration and distribution characteristics or on constructing and applying ecological security evaluation models [7].
There are three widely used ecological security evaluation models, pressure-state-response (PSR), driving force-state-response (DFSR), and driving force-pressure-state-influence-response (DPSIR) models. The PSR model is biased toward environmental indicators. The DFSR model adds social, economic, and other human indicators to the PSR model. The DPSIR model adds driving force and influence to the PSR framework and mainly focuses on economic indicators. The ecological security evaluation system adopting the ecological footprint method has gradually emerged in recent years. The advantage of this method is that it reflects the stability of the local ecological environment [8]. There are some limitations in the current ecological security evaluation study. Given that the classification of ecological security level thresholds is unclear, and given that there is no unified evaluation index system, further research on the impact factors of driving force and coupling effect is required [7].

3.2. Regional Sustainable Development

With the introduction and development of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), sustainable development has become a significant issue of common concern in economics, ecology, and sociology. SDGs point out that social progress, economic development, and environmental protection are the three pillars of sustainable development [9]. Regional sustainable development is an integral part of sustainable development. Compared with the global system, the regional system is more convenient for management and policy implementation. That is to say, based on a deep understanding of the process of regional socio-economic development and environmental change, regional sustainable development is easier to achieve than sustainable development [10]. The main difference between sustainable development and regional sustainable development has three dimensions. One is regional systems’ openness (or interconnectedness); for example, emissions from one region may affect other regions through inter-regional diffusion; the second is the aspects that do not level off on a regional scale compared to the global one, which means we need to distinguish between global and regional equilibrium; the third is the regional authority of public goods [11]. The spatial heterogeneity of global resource distribution or environmental pollution causes uneven resource shortage or environmental pollution in regions, which means regions bear different resource and ecological pressures. Surpluses may compensate for the depletion of primary resources from one region in other regions. Ecological compensation is thus a feasible tool for cross-regional and cross-temporal resource and environmental management.
Regional ecology aims to support sustainable development from an ecological perspective at the regional scale. Regional sustainable development is the primary goal of regional ecology research. Regional sustainable development focuses on the differences in regional sustainable development modes, the variation and transformation of the driving forces of regional sustainability at different scales, the impact of regional dependencies on sustainability, and the interactions between local and global sustainable equilibrium and economic development [12]. Global climate change profoundly affects regional ecosystem services and human well-being, affecting regional sustainability. Enhancing the comprehensive coordination of regional social, economic, and environmental systems is vital for promoting high-quality regional development and achieving global sustainable development goals.

3.3. Regional Water-Energy-Food Nexus

Water, energy, and food are the necessary resources for human survival and development, and they are also the limiting factors of regional sustainable development. The three resources have long been the hotspots of sustainable development research. Recently, research that treats the three as a whole, namely the water-energy-food nexus, and studies their internal dependencies or the impact of external factors, such as climate change and population growth, is developing rapidly. Water-energy-food nexus research regards water, food, and energy as an interrelated system and studies the correlation between the three resources. Its purpose is to meet human demand while protecting the ecosystem [13].
One of the characteristics of the water-energy-food nexus is its locality. There may be significant differences in water, energy, food endowment, industrial structure, and climate environment in different regions, causing different nexus structures and characteristics. For example, water resources are the main limiting factor for ecological and economic development in Loess Plateau, China, while food in urban agglomerations such as Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei mainly relies on external inputs. Currently, water-energy-food nexus research focuses on theoretical analysis such as clarifying the concept, establishing research frameworks, the trade-off and synergy relationship within resources, the comprehensive quantitative model, and the driving mechanism of the nexus. In-depth localized decision analysis and applied research based on the nexus are relatively lacking.

3.4. Ecosystem Service Value Assessment

Ecosystem services are ‘the benefits that humans derive from ecosystems’ [14] or ‘the direct or indirect contributions of ecosystems to human well-being and benefits’ [15]. From the perspective of ecological functions, ecosystem services can be classified into four categories, provisioning (providing food and products), regulating (maintaining the role of the earth’s biosphere), supporting (providing living space for creatures on the earth and providing preconditions for the existence of all ecological resources), and cultural services (providing opportunities for recreation and research, education, aesthetics, art, etc.) [16].
Ecosystem service value assessment is a quantitative assessment of ecosystem services from the perspective of monetary value based on ecological principles, economics, and sociological methods [16]. By the end of the 20th century, the evaluation of ecosystem services had attracted extensive attention in academia. The ecosystem service value assessment has formed a logical chain of ‘ecological components-ecological process-ecological function-ecosystem service-ecological benefit-ecological compensation’ [17]. The value evaluation index system has been continuously improved, and the value evaluation method has gradually been modeled, precise, and dynamic [17]. Current research focuses on ecological asset pricing and marketization.

4. The Special Issue of Regional Ecology and Sustainability

This Special Issue discusses both classic topics and emerging frontiers in regional ecology. The classical topics include ecosystem services trade-offs caused by their spatiotemporal heterogeneity and the interaction between regional economic growth and the environment. To be specific, the former includes coupling coordination between ecological footprint and ecosystem services and ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in ecologically important regions [18,19]. The latter includes the effects and mechanism of how OFDI affects carbon emission, as well as the coupling relationship or decoupling phenomena between regional economic growth and the environment [20,21,22]. Especially, this Special Issue introduces the dimension of culture into regional ecology studies. For example, the distribution, landscape patterns, and impact factors of traditional villages and the spatial distribution of ethnic groups in Southwest China are recognized to support regional sustainable development [23,24].

5. Conclusions

Regional ecology is the ecological study between the micro and macro scales. Since natural experiments are difficult to repeat at the regional scale, regional ecology often adopts quasi-natural experimental methods with time and space as variables. Analytical results based on ecological inferences are encouraged in regional ecology. Due to the complexity of regional ecosystems and environmental problems, regional ecology does not define clear research methods and research objects in a broad sense. The research hotspots of regional ecology include regional ecological security evaluation, regional sustainable development evaluation, regional resource analysis represented by the water-food-energy relationship, and ecosystem service value evaluation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.D.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.; writing—review and editing, H.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi, grant number 2021JQ-546 and State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, J. The basic theoretical exploration of regional ecology. China Environ. Sci. 2013, 7, 1252–1262. [Google Scholar]
  2. Schneider, D.C. The Rise of the Concept of Scale in Ecology. BioScience 2001, 51, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zhao, W.; Wei, W.; Feng, X. The characteristics and subject orientation of regional ecology and its relationship with the other subjects. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 4593–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hargrove, W.W.; Pickering, J. Pseudoreplication: A Sine qua Non for Regional Ecology. Landscape Ecol 1992, 6, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, Y.; Song, G.; Lu, S. Assessment of Land Ecosystem Health with Monte Carlo Simulation: A Case Study in Qiqihaer, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Power, T.M. Ecosystem Preservation and the Economy in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Conserv. Biol. 1991, 5, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wen, J.; Hou, K. Research on the Progress of Regional Ecological Security Evaluation and Optimization of Its Common Limitations. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 127, 107797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feng, D.; Zhao, G. Footprint Assessments on Organic Farming to Improve Ecological Safety in the Water Source Areas of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, W.; Liu, Y.; Fu, B. Research progress on the interlinkages between the 17 Sustainable Development Goals and their implication for domestic study. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 22, 8327–8337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kairiukstis, L. Ecological Sustainability of Regional Development-Background to the Problem. In Ecological Sustainability of Regional Development; IISA: Laxenburg, Austria, 1989; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nijkamp, P.; Laschuit, P.; Soeteman, F. Sustainable Development in a Regional System; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991; 35p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Han, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhen, B. Promoting the construction of ecological civilization and promoting regional sustainable development—A review of the 2020 academic forum on Ecological Civilization and Sustainable Development in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2021, 03, 1259–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, L.; Zhang, P.; Hao, Y.; Tang, S.; Liu, G. Urban Food-Energy-Water (FEW) Nexus: Conceptual Frameworks and Prospects. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 1144–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Reid, W.V.; Mooney, H.A.; Capistrano, D.; Carpenter, S.R.; Chopra, K.; Cropper, A.; Dasgupta, P.; Hassan, R.; Leemans, R.; May, R.M.; et al. Nature: The Many Benefits of Ecosystem Services. Nature 2006, 443, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Burkhard, B.; Petrosillo, I.; Costanza, R. Ecosystem Services—Bridging Ecology, Economy and Social Sciences. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ouyang, Z.; Zhu, C.; Yang, G.; Xu, W.; Zhen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, Y. Gross Ecosystem Product: Concept, Accounting Framework and Case Study. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2006, 33, 323–326. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhao, J.; Yang, K. Valuation of ecosystem services: Characteristics, issues and prospects. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2007, 27, 346–356. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, L.; Yu, E.; Li, S.; Fu, X.; Wu, G. Analysis of Ecosystem Service Trade-offs and Synergies in Ulansuhai Basin. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, H.; Yang, J.; Xia, G.; Lin, T. Spatio-Temporal Differentiation of Coupling Coordination between Ecological Footprint and Ecosystem Service Functions in the Aksu Region, Xinjiang, China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tan, F.; Wan, H.; Jiang, X.; Niu, Z. The Impact of Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Carbon Emission toward China’s Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, J.; Hou, L.; Wang, L.; Tang, L. Decoupling Analysis between Economic Growth and Air Pollution in Key Regions of Air Pollution Control in China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Zhao, M.; Zhong, W.; Li, J.; Zheng, C. Coupling Relationship of Urban Development and the Eco-Environment in Guanzhong Region, China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zheng, X.; Wu, J.; Deng, H. Spatial Distribution and Land Use of Traditional Villages in Southwest China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shen, Y.; Wang, D.; Wu, J.; Yu, T.; Li, T.; Li, S. Regional Features and Spatial Distribution of Fifty-Eight Ethnic Groups in Southwest China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mao, S.; Deng, H. Regional Ecology Supporting Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127302

AMA Style

Mao S, Deng H. Regional Ecology Supporting Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2022; 14(12):7302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mao, Shuxin, and Hongbing Deng. 2022. "Regional Ecology Supporting Sustainable Development" Sustainability 14, no. 12: 7302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop