Next Article in Journal
Power Factor Prediction in Three Phase Electrical Power Systems Using Machine Learning
Previous Article in Journal
The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Performance (CSP)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Determinants Affecting Public Intention to Use Micro-Vertical Farming: A Survey Investigation

Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9114; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159114
by Yiming Shao 1,*,†, Zhugen Wang 1,†, Zhiwei Zhou 1, Haojing Chen 1, Yuanlong Cui 2 and Zhenghuan Zhou 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9114; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159114
Submission received: 13 June 2022 / Revised: 30 June 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 25 July 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper is entitled Determinants affecting public intention of micro vertical farming: A survey investigation. I appreciate this opportunity to review this paper.

I have some comments:

1. The introduction is very long. So, contents will be not conveyed effectively to the readers.

2. Row  446-450 this paragraph needs to be included in the section 3.3

3. For the section in which you explain the ANOVA comparisons between different ones groups are recommended omit comparisons that do not differ.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting manuscript on important matter. Please see some comments to ameliorate the manuscript

1) the manuscript is quite long and it dwells on some matters that are quite important but not so relevant to the manuscript eg the theory of planned behavior update. as a result, the introduction is very long and it is not in line with eg materials and methods. please shorten considerably 

2) in the same manner, the part where you explain the ANOVA comparisons between the different groups is not so interesting unless you can see clear differences between the groups. It is proposed that you omit the comparisons that do not show differences and to shorten the discussion on the differences found

3) regarding the "intention to use" parameter it looks a bit vague  to me that you say whether you will use these farms in the future because you do not give the timeline that this will be done, please elaborate

4) since most of the pathways were significant I would like to see some classification of most important versus not so important relationships

5) please quote if possible the relevant references

Botetzagias I, Dima A-F, Malesios C (2015) Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: the role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resour Conserv Recycl 95:58–67.

5) please quote if possible the relevant references

Botetzagias I, Dima A-F, Malesios C (2015) Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: the role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resour Conserv Recycl 95:58–67.

Papaoikonomou et al A Survey on Factors Influencing Recycling Behavior for Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Municipality of Volos, Greece. Environmental Processes 7, 321–339 (2020)

pages321–339 (2020)

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop