Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper has been improved based on prior comments and reviews.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for prompt response and review.

Best regards,

Authors

Reviewer 2 Report

I appreciate the authors' effort to improve the paper, especially the discussion about the contribution to their study.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for prompt response and review.

Best regards,

Authors

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors, 

Thank you very much for all improvements and clarification of the changes made in the paper. I am satisfied with the amendments introduced in the text.  I have only one comment relating to the research questions.  

Lines 75-76:"This research seeks to answer the following research questions: is the non-financial information presented in hospitality reports sufficient and how its content can be improved."

The second research question is the answer to the first research question: Yes,  the non-financial information presented in hospitality reports is insufficient. I propose to change the second research question a bit: if this information is insufficient, how its content can be improved?".

Good luck with your future research. 

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your prompt review and to pointing out the issue with the research question 2. We agree with your comments and have amended the research question in the paper.

Best regards,

Authors