Next Article in Journal
BIM-Based Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for Buildings
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Method for Gas Disaster Prevention during the Construction Period in Coal Penetration Tunnels—A Stepwise Prediction of Gas Concentration Based on the LSTM Method
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Temperature on the Electrical and Thermal Behaviour of a Photovoltaic/Thermal System Cooled Using SiC Nanofluid: An Experimental and Comparison Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study on Strength Weakening of Gypsum Rock with Effect of Long-Term Overlying Strata Pressure
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Effects of True Triaxial Loading and Unloading Rates on the Damage Mechanical Properties of Sandstone

Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 11899; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911899
by Man Wang 1, Weihang Du 2, Yingwei Wang 1, Xinjian Li 1,3, Liming Qiu 4, Beichen Yu 2, Zehua Niu 1,2 and Dongming Zhang 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 11899; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911899
Submission received: 16 August 2022 / Revised: 3 September 2022 / Accepted: 12 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Mine Hazards Identification, Prevention and Control)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article contains interesting laboratory tests which, both from a scientific and technological point of view, constitute the basis for the behavior of rocks under high pressure conditions.

Below are some comments and suggestions:

1. In the introduction, a few sentences should be added regarding the numerical modeling of rock failure for different pressures.

2. In the second chapter, the description of the test samples should be extended, in particular: what was the bulk density and whether the samples were cut perpendicularly or parallel to the stratification.

3. The second figure is better called stress-strain characteristics.

4. In subsection 3.3.1 for Figure 10, it should be written what percentage of energy is the post-destructive characteristic. Is it characteristic for sandstone samples?

5. In the discussion section, several references should be added to compare the results of the laboratory tests.

6. In the summary, one conclusion should be added regarding the numerical values ​​presented in the third chapter.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Different true triaxial loading and unloading rates are designed in this paper, and the mechanical properties of sandstone under σ1 loading and σ3 unloading are experimentally studied, and some meaningful conclusions are obtained. The paper is clear and concise. This paper meets the publication requirements of this journal, and I recommend a minor revision for it.

Some improvements to be made:

1) The abstract could be more concise.

2) The introduction section should add the latest achievements of international journals, point out the current research situation, and highlight the research content and innovation of this paper.

3) The ViG and ViH formats in lines 174 to 181 should be modified to comply with journal requirements.

4) The conclusion should be concise and highlight the key points.

5) Statement “As Can be seen from Table 6, sandstone at different unloading rate under the condition of true triaxial, as the direction loading and the direction unloading, basically doesn’t produce damage before Dth elastic limit point.” is not clear. It should be modified.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop