Self-Sufficiency of New Administrative Capitals (NACs) Based on Types and Commuting Characteristics of Citizens: Case Study of Sejong
Abstract
:1. Research Background and Objectives
2. Literature Review
2.1. Literature on NACs
2.2. Literature on Self-Sufficiency
3. Research Scope and Methods
3.1. Research Scope
3.2. Research Method
4. Data Analysis and Results
4.1. Commuting Distance and Ratio of Intra-City and Inter-City Travel
4.2. Spatial Variance Analysis of Commuting Destinations by Region Using GIS
4.3. Analysis of Household Type by Region
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kwon:, Y. The process of selecting the planned site for an administrative complex city. J. Geogr. Soc. Korea 2005, 39, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, S.; Kweon, I. Evaluation on the construction of multifunctional administrative city (Phase 1) through importance–performance analysis (IPA). J. Korean Reg. Dev. Assoc. 2017, 29, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Song, Y.-I.; Rhim, J.-H. Economic self-sufficiency criteria for new town planning by network characteristics. LHI J. Land Hous. Urban Aff. 2016, 7, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Son, J. Self-sufficiency and development possibility of new types of cities. In Proceedings of the KGS Conference, Seoul, Korea, 1 December 2007; Volume 2007, pp. 22–53. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.; Lee, H. Megacity Strategies for Both the Metropolitan Area and Provinces. Issue Diagn. 2020, 433, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Jo, M.R. Multifunctional administrative city promotion plan. Open Chungnam Rev. 2010, 52, 8–26. [Google Scholar]
- Elmouelhi, H. New administrative Capital-Cairo: Power, Urban Development and Social Injustice – the Official Egyptian Model of Neoliberalism. In Neoliberale Urbanisierung; Al-Hamarneh, A., Margraff, J., Scharfenort, N., Eds.; Transcript Verlag: Bielefeld, Germany, 2019; pp. 215–254. [Google Scholar]
- Rachmawati, R.; Haryono, E.; Rohmah, A.A. Developing smart city in the new capital of Indonesia. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), Manchester, UK, 7–10 September 2021; Volume 2021, pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Kwon, Y.; Si, S. Sejong Si (City): Are TOD and TND models effective in planning Korea’s new capital? Cities 2015, 42, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelrahman Hussein, A.A.A.; Pollock, E. Sustainable Development approaches in Egypt. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 297, 012027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ghalib, H.; El-Khorazaty, M.T.; Serag, Y. New capital cities as tools of development and nation-building: Review of Astana and Egypt’s new administrative capital city. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2021, 12, 3405–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomeseria, R.V. Challenge of Environmental Advocacy in Construction Industry. Durreesamin J. 2018, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Moser, S. Putrajaya: Malaysia’s new federal administrative capital. Cities 2010, 27, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almdhun, H.M.; Mallak, S.K.; Aburas, M.M.; Md Said, M.A.; Ghadiri, S.M. Measuring and predicting urban growth patterns and trends in Putrajaya, Malaysia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 169, 012114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimamura, T.; Mizunoya, T. Sustainability prediction model for capital city relocation in Indonesia based on inclusive wealth and system dynamics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Y.; Zhao, W. Making a new area in Xiong’an: Incentives and challenges of China’s “Millennium Plan”. Geoforum 2018, 88, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhong, N.; Zhao, W. Urban planning as a way to pursue quality-oriented urbanization: Anatomy of the urban planning of Xiong’an New Area, China. J. Urban Aff. 2021, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Im, C.-W.; Kim, C.-G. A study on the sustainability of the new towns in Tokyo metropolitan area: Focusing on self-sufficiency and social-mix. LHI J. Land Hous. Urban Aff. 2011, 2, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byun, B.S.; Joo, Y.J. Establishment of indicators and evaluation for sustainable new city land use. J. Korea Plan. Assoc. 2000, 35, 69–84. [Google Scholar]
- Byeon, C.H. Improvement of housing lot development for increasing self-sufficiency of the new town. Hous. Stud. 2005, 13, 175–208. [Google Scholar]
- Seo, J.; Lee, J. Analyzing the Allocation Criterion of Land Use to Enhance Self-sufficiency of New Towns. Korea Spat. Plan. Rev. 2011, 69, 157–177. [Google Scholar]
- Jeong, D.; Kim, H. Analyzing the levels of self-containment and centrality of the five first-period new towns built in the Seoul metropolitan area. J. Korean Urban Geogr. Soc. 2010, 13, 103–116. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.H.; Ban, J.H.; Song, T.J.; Hong, S. An analysis of economic self-sufficiency in new towns using commuter traffic-focused on new towns built for balanced development. J. Archit. Inst. Korea 2022, 38, 117–128. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.; Joo, M.; Ha, J. An analysis of changes in commuting characteristics and urban spatial structure of the first generation new towns in the Seoul metropolitan area (1996–2010): Focused on self-containment and centrality. J. Korea Plan. Assoc. 2015, 50, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, T.H.; Kim, H.-S. A study on the change of self-sufficiency in Seoul metropolitan area–supply-side analysis of the data between 1995 and 2010. J. Korea Plan. Assoc. 2014, 49, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, M. A Study on Evaluation of the Self-Sufficiency of Cities Using Work Trips in the Seoul Metropolitan Region. Master’s thesis, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Horner, M.W.; Mefford, J.N. Investigating urban spatial mismatch using job–housing indicators to model home–work separation. Environ. Plan. A 2007, 39, 1420–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordon, P.; Kumar, A.; Richardson, H.W. The influence of metropolitan spatial structure on commuting time. J. Urban Econ. 1989, 26, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ta, N.; Chai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, D. Understanding job-housing relationship and commuting pattern in Chinese cities: Past, present and future. Transp. Res. D 2017, 52, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z. A study on urban spatial structure in the context of the jobs-housing balance: A case of Suzhou, China. In Smart Growth Sustainable Development; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 73–85. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, P.; Lü, B.; de Roo, G. Urban expansion and transportation: The impact of urban form on commuting patterns on the city fringe of Beijing. Environ. Plan. A 2010, 42, 2467–2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, J.J. A Study on the Direction of the Third Phase New Town Development in Seoul Metropolitan Area through expert survey method. LHI J. Land Hous. Urban Aff. 2019, 10, 43–55. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S.; Lee, D.; Moon, S.; Byeon, S.; Kim, J. Evaluation and directions of New Town development policies in the Seoul metropolitan area. KRIHS Policy Brief 2021, 822, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Jo, P.; Jeong, W. Multifunctional administrative city construction process and completion task. KRIHS 2021, 471, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
- Oh, S.; Lee, W. A time series analysis of urban structural change in Pyeongtaek City. J. Korea Plan. Assoc. 2012, 47, 33–44. [Google Scholar]
- An, Y.; Lee, S. A study on the construction of spatial database and the characteristics of relocation for the relocated firms by industrial types. J. Korea Plan. Assoc. 2014, 49, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ban, J. Income redistribution and poverty alleviation effect by housing type. Lab. Rev. 2009, 54, 67–83. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H.-K.; Hong, W.-H.; Kim, Y.-C. A new estimation model of MSW generation based on household composition-types and floor area in apartment house. J. Korean Hous. Assoc. 2012, 23, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
- Jang, S.; Yi, C. Imbalance between local commuting accessibility and residential locations of households by income class in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Cities 2021, 109, 103011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matkan, A.A.; Shahri, M.; Mirzaie, M. Bivariate Moran’s I and LISA to explore the crash risky locations in urban areas. In Proceedings of the Conference of Network-Association of European Researchers on Urbanisation in the South, Enschede, The Netherlands, September 2013; pp. 12–14. [Google Scholar]
- Anselin, L. GeoDa 0.9 User’s Guide. Spatial Analysis Laboratory; University of Illinois: Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, D.; Ye, C.; Wang, X.; Lu, D.; Xu, J.; Yang, H. Global distribution and evolvement of urbanization and PM2.5 (1998–2015). Atmos. Environ. 2018, 182, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C. Analysis of the influence factors of agglomeration by industry in eup, myeon, and dong in the metropolitan area using spatial metrology model. GRI Res. J. 2016, 18, 1–33. [Google Scholar]
- Cho, M.; Song, J. Regional characteristics of migration inflow of one-person households in the Seoul metropolitan area: Focusing on Migration Motivation between Job and Housing. J. Korea Plan. Assoc. 2020, 55, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Classification | Brazil | Australia | Japan | Malaysia | Republic of Korea | Egypt | Philippines | Indonesia |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | NAC Construction | NAC Construction | NAC Construction | NAC Construction | NAC Construction | NAC Construction | NAC Discussion | NAC Discussion |
Purpose/Background | Inland area development | Federal national symbol project | Balanced national development | Balanced national development | Balanced national development | Balanced national development | Balanced national development | Balanced national development, resolving environmental issues |
Period | 1955–1970 | 1908–1980 | 1992–Currently invalid | 1993–2010 | 2007–Currently in progress | 2015–Currently in progress | Currently under discussion | Currently under discussion |
Special note | Security and national development center | Academic/research/art function integration | Reflecting the national characteristics of decentralization | Except for the Royal Family and the Bundestag | Changed to a multi-functional administrative city due to unconstitutional issues | 5 million metropolis targets | Considered as a way to spread the growth of large cities | President’s strong push |
Multiple Comparisons | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tukey’s HSD | |||||||
Dependent variable | (i) Regional code | (j) Regional code | Mean difference (i–j) | Standard error | p value | 95% confidence interval | |
Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||||
Average commuting distance | Sejong | Daejeon | 2621.0023636 * | 588.0476634 | 0.000 | 1090.866767 | 4151.137960 |
Cheongju | 3472.1191656 * | 635.2671735 | 0.000 | 1819.115547 | 5125.122784 | ||
Cheonan | 3634.0101259 * | 682.3864079 | 0.000 | 1858.399409 | 5409.620843 | ||
Average distance to school | Sejong | Daejeon | −983.7157282 | 852.7424699 | 0.657 | −3202.603225 | 1235.171768 |
Cheongju | −2415.3300036 * | 921.2166501 | 0.048 | −4812.391460 | −18.268548 | ||
Cheonan | −1373.0647563 | 989.5454180 | 0.509 | −3947.921800 | 1201.792288 | ||
Average distance to private academy | Sejong | Daejeon | −624.1560903 | 486.3043008 | 0.575 | −1889.549302 | 641.237121 |
Cheongju | −594.5800376 | 525.3539429 | 0.671 | −1961.582780 | 772.422705 | ||
Cheonan | −1255.5413656 | 564.3206590 | 0.122 | −2723.937861 | 212.855130 | ||
Average distance to shopping areas | Sejong | Daejeon | 514.5920831 | 494.6446715 | 0.726 | −772.503278 | 1801.687444 |
Cheongju | 637.8508508 | 534.3640352 | 0.632 | −752.596697 | 2028.298399 | ||
Cheonan | 820.1581663 | 573.9990507 | 0.484 | −673.422090 | 2313.738422 |
Multiple Comparisons | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tukey’s HSD | |||||||
Dependent variable | (I) CODE | (J) CODE | Mean difference (I–J) | Standard error | p value | 95% confidence interval | |
Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||||
Internal commuting ratio | Sejong | Daejeon | −0.1948380 * | 0.0208854 | 0.000 | −0.249183 | −0.140493 |
Cheongju | −0.2060066 * | 0.0225625 | 0.000 | −0.264716 | −0.147298 | ||
Cheonan | −0.2036130 * | 0.0242360 | 0.000 | −0.266677 | −0.140549 | ||
Internal school commuting ratio | Sejong | Daejeon | −0.0341300 | 0.0189290 | 0.277 | −0.083384 | 0.015125 |
Cheongju | −0.0057187 | 0.0204490 | 0.992 | −0.058928 | 0.047491 | ||
Cheonan | −0.0324174 | 0.0219658 | 0.455 | −0.089574 | 0.024739 | ||
Internal private academy commuting ratio | Sejong | Daejeon | −0.0008355 | 0.0297607 | 1.000 | −0.078275 | 0.076604 |
Cheongju | −0.0005510 | 0.0321504 | 1.000 | −0.084208 | 0.083106 | ||
Cheonan | 0.0546093 | 0.0345351 | 0.393 | −0.035253 | 0.144472 | ||
Internal shopping commuting ratio | Sejong | Daejeon | −0.0545728 * | 0.0067486 | 0.000 | −0.072133 | −0.037013 |
Cheongju | −0.0561269 * | 0.0072905 | 0.000 | −0.075097 | −0.037157 | ||
Cheonan | −0.0569028 * | 0.0078312 | 0.000 | −0.077280 | −0.036525 |
Multiple Comparisons | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tukey HSD | |||||||
Dependent variable | (I) Local_code | (J) Local_code | Mean difference (I–J) | Standard error | p value | 95% confidence interval | |
Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||||
One-generational household ratio | Sejong | Daejeon | −0.0237611 * | 0.0030318 | 0.000 | −0.031552 | −0.015970 |
Cheongju | −0.0113181 * | 0.0032984 | 0.003 | −0.019794 | −0.002842 | ||
Cheonan | 0.0096786 * | 0.0034025 | 0.023 | 0.000935 | 0.018422 | ||
Two-generational household ratio | Sejong | Daejeon | 0.1267152 * | 0.0099961 | 0.000 | 0.101028 | 0.152403 |
Cheongju | 0.0959205 * | 0.0108751 | 0.000 | 0.067974 | 0.123867 | ||
Cheonan | 0.0727344 * | 0.0112183 | 0.000 | 0.043906 | 0.101563 | ||
Three-generational household ratio | Sejong | Daejeon | −0.0025234 | 0.0012602 | 0.187 | −0.005762 | 0.000715 |
Cheongju | −0.0069762 * | 0.0013711 | 0.000 | −0.010499 | −0.003453 | ||
Cheonan | −0.0021211 | 0.0014143 | 0.438 | −0.005756 | 0.001513 | ||
Single-person household ratio | Sejong | Daejeon | −0.1246426 * | 0.0107597 | 0.000 | −0.152292 | −0.096993 |
Cheongju | −0.1049691 * | 0.0117058 | 0.000 | −0.135050 | −0.074888 | ||
Cheonan | −0.0990003 * | 0.0120752 | 0.000 | −0.130031 | −0.067970 |
Classification | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Commuting distance | Lagrange multiplier | Lag ** | 0.02083 |
Error | 0.11992 | ||
Robust LM | Lag ** | 0.03289 | |
Error | 0.20188 |
Dependent Variable | Independent Variable | Coefficient | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Commuting distance | Spatial lag Coef ** | 0.1871784 | 0.02763 |
One-generational household ratio | 5007.54 | 0.41118 | |
Three-generational household ratio | −37328.51 | 0.08294 | |
Single-person household ratio ** | −3786.229 | 0.04884 | |
Non-family household ratio | −12986.07 | 0.49267 | |
R-squared | 0.141762 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Im, J.-h.; Jang, S. Self-Sufficiency of New Administrative Capitals (NACs) Based on Types and Commuting Characteristics of Citizens: Case Study of Sejong. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013193
Im J-h, Jang S. Self-Sufficiency of New Administrative Capitals (NACs) Based on Types and Commuting Characteristics of Citizens: Case Study of Sejong. Sustainability. 2022; 14(20):13193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013193
Chicago/Turabian StyleIm, Jin-hong, and Seongman Jang. 2022. "Self-Sufficiency of New Administrative Capitals (NACs) Based on Types and Commuting Characteristics of Citizens: Case Study of Sejong" Sustainability 14, no. 20: 13193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013193
APA StyleIm, J. -h., & Jang, S. (2022). Self-Sufficiency of New Administrative Capitals (NACs) Based on Types and Commuting Characteristics of Citizens: Case Study of Sejong. Sustainability, 14(20), 13193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013193