What Is the Policy Effect of Coupling the Green Hydrogen Market, National Carbon Trading Market and Electricity Market?

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper studies the policy effect of coupling green hydrogen market, national carbon trading market and electricity market. Some suggestions for improvement are listed below. For this paper, my final comment is minor revision.

 

 

1. The Abstract is too long, please simplify it.

 

2. The Introduction section must be written on more quality way. Research gap should be delivered on more clear way with directed necessity for the conducted research work.

 

3.The Literature review section should be improved by more critically reviewing the literature, avoid just listing various articles. These should lead the reader to a gap in the literature which has been addressed by your study.

 

4. The system dynamics model constructed in this paper should be clearly described.

 

5. Energy language should be carefully checked and carefully check paper for language typos.

 

6. In the Policy recommendations Section, suggestions on improving the linkage of multiple markets should be put forward.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper is a well-written study for understanding the policy effect of coupling green hydrogen market, national carbon trading market and electricity market. However, some minor questions have not been well addressed. Thus, my suggestion is minor revision at this stage.

 

1. The citation format is not right, e.g., Shaozhou Qi et al. --> Qi et al. 

 

2. Some grammatical errors and irregular English writing can be found in the full text. I suggested that authors seek a native speaker to improve them. 

 

3. The reference was not well organized. Please refer to the requirements of this Journal. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

English language should be carefully checked and carefully check paper for language typos.

Abbreviations that are unavoidable in the abstract must be defined at their first mention there, as well as in the footnote. Ensure consistency of abbreviations throughout the article.

A nomenclature section needs to be supplied.

Check your citation style. You have cited both " name and surname" and briquettes. For example, Wang Yanzhe et al. (2022) and [X]. Another problem is that you specify the citation in the form of your name and surname.

Research gap should be delivered on more clear way with directed necessity for the conducted research work.

The caption of Figure 2 is marked. Why?

Please use the horizontally (landscape paper) so that Figure 2 can be more readable.

Please use the horizontally (landscape paper) so that Figure 3 can be more readable.

Conclusion section is missing some perspective related to the future research work.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf