Next Article in Journal
Deterioration of Novel Silver Coated Mirrors on Polycarbonate Used for Concentrated Solar Power
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Resource Allocation in Automated Container Terminals
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Mortality Risk of Chinese Older Adults from the Perspective of Social Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Heuristic Algorithm Based on Travel Demand for Transit Network Design
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Novel Hybrid Model for Short-Term Traffic Flow Prediction Based on Extreme Learning Machine and Improved Kernel Density Estimation

Sustainability 2022, 14(24), 16361; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416361
by Leina Zhao 1,2, Yujia Bai 1,*, Sishi Zhang 1, Yanpeng Wang 2, Jie Kang 3 and Wenxuan Zhang 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Sustainability 2022, 14(24), 16361; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416361
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable, Resilient and Smart Mobility)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 Thank's for your work. You could provide your collected datas to communutiy as well, but this is not necessary

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper proposed a model for improving the accuracy of short-term traffic flow prediction based on ELM, AKDE, and CKDE. ELM was employed to handle non-linear prediction, AKDE was adopted to estimate the bandwidth of CKDE, and CKDE was applied to handle the residuals obtained by ELM. The performance of the proposed model was evaluated on two datasets, the results indicated that the proposed model obtained better performance than other concerned models.

There are some problems need to be solved, as shown below.

(1) Expressions should be improved.

Some sentences contain grammatical mistakes or are not complete sentences, such as, “Divide ...” and “Establish ...” in section 2.3, the title “Improved percentages...” of Table 3, and so on.

(2) Formulas should be checked again.

For example, in formula (9),X=[x1, ... ,xN]R(n-d)xd,the detailed matrix of X seems wrong.

(3) Experiments setting should be provided.

We cannot find the parameters of ARIMA in this paper. In fact, different parameters may have great impacts on prediction results.

(4) About the evaluation metrics.

We suggest that the metrics should be named more professionally. What's the difference between MRPE and MAPE? What's the difference between RMSRE and RMSPE?

(5) About Baselines.

In conventional models, only ARIMA is taken for comparison, more baselines should be added.

(6) About the advantages of the proposed model.

As we know, there are different deep learning (DL) models for traffic flow prediction, what are the advantages of your proposed model?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The title should not have unknown or many abbreviations. So, please elaborate ELM-AKDE-CKDE.

Fig. 2: What is the meaning of the dashed blocks? What are the inputs to the right-side dashed block?

What is the dimension of the input vector? What does it correspond?

Fig. 7: What is the unit of 'Time Series'?

The proposed method should be compared with state-of-the-art methods with references.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

In Figure 3, the detailed address of the intersection is needed.

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for addressing the comments. 

 

Back to TopTop