Next Article in Journal
The Landscapes of Sustainability in the Library and Information Science: Collaboration Insights
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Analysis of Industrial Carbon Footprint and Carbon-Carrying Capacity of Zhejiang Province in China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 24
10.3390/su142416826
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Effects of Chinese Consumers’ Brand Green Stereotypes on Purchasing Intention toward Upcycled Clothing

Sustainability 2022, 14(24), 16826; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416826
by Chen Pang 1,*, Jie Zhou 2 and Xiaofen Ji 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Zhuojun Liu
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(24), 16826; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416826
Submission received: 11 October 2022 / Revised: 26 November 2022 / Accepted: 9 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please, revise numbring of items in the Conclussions section.

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

Thank you for your suggestion. We have carefully made some changes according to your suggestions. Revision notes, point-to-point, are given as follows:

Point 1: Please, revise numbring of items in the Conclussions section.

Response 1: Thank you for the reviewer’s careful check. We have revised the numbering of the items in the Conclusions section.

Reviewer 2 Report

Please refer to the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

Thank you for taking your time to review this manuscript. We have carefully made some changes according to your suggestions. Revision notes, point-to-point, are given in the attachment. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Table 2.  Add footnote to indicate the meaning of the asterisk (*) attached to the Dimension, moderator(s) label.

Lines 222-230.   Please describe the characteristics of the 25 interviewees.  How were they recruited?  How was it determined that they were valid interviewees?

 

Lines 357-368.

What factors disqualified the 173 questionnaires?

For the age variable, please clarify what is meant by “post-90s” and “post80s”

Please provide additional detail on the occupations of the respondents.  “Corporate staff” is board.  Can more detail be provided on the positions of these staff?

Can more detail be provided on the regions of China where the respondents are located?

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

Thank you for taking your time to review this manuscript. We have carefully made some changes according to your suggestions. Revision notes, point-to-point, are given in the attachment. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I think after the revision, the quality of the paper is good enough to be published on sustainability.

Back to TopTop