Next Article in Journal
Fire Safety of Healthcare Units in Conditions of Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19: Empirical Establishing of Effects of Elevated Oxygen Concentrations
Next Article in Special Issue
Analytical Model for the Development Strategy of a Low-Density Territory: The Montesinho Natural Park
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Blockchain in Revolutionizing the Agricultural Sector
Previous Article in Special Issue
Romanian Wine Tourism—A Paved Road or a Footpath in Rural Tourism?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Strengthening of Community Tourism Enterprises as a Means of Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Case Study of Community Tourism Development in Chimborazo

by
Claudia Patricia Maldonado-Erazo
1,2,
María de la Cruz del Río-Rama
3,*,
Sandra Patricia Miranda-Salazar
1 and
Nancy P. Tierra-Tierra
1
1
Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Riobamba 060155, Ecuador
2
Programa de Doctorado en Desarrollo Territorial Sostenible (R015), Instituto Universitario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Territorial Sostenible (INTERRA), Universidad de Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain
3
Business Management and Marketing Department, Faculty of Business Sciences and Tourism, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(7), 4314; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074314
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 30 March 2022 / Accepted: 31 March 2022 / Published: 5 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Rural Development through Entrepreneurship and Innovation)

Abstract

:
Community tourism (CT) constitutes a management model for tourism practice within communities, which was consolidated within Ecuador through the Plurinational Federation of Community Tourism of Ecuador (FEPTCE), with the Corporation for the Development of Community Tourism of Chimborazo (CORDTUCH) as the central network in the province of Chimborazo. This network, with 14 years of experience, has been committed to tourism as a mechanism for the diversification of the productive matrix of the peasant and indigenous communities that comprise it, integrating 1772 direct beneficiaries articulated in 10 CT organizations. Thus, they have managed to support actions related to land management, the equitable distribution of benefits, the valuation of natural and cultural heritage, and the organizational strengthening of communities. This support has contributed to the consolidation of “Alli Kawsay,” that is, working to achieve a full life for these human groups, generating an integral sustainability of their spaces, and contributing to the fulfilment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) from this other Andean perspective. The methodology employed focused on participatory action research (PAR), which allows for listening and obtaining information directly from key actors, recognizing the existence of knowledge that has not been published that corresponds to peoples’ ancestral knowledge. The aim of this research is to provide an overview of the current reality of CT within CORDTUCH, as well as the strengthening achieved in the community enterprises that comprise it. Among the main results achieved, it is highlighted that CT has become, for these communities, a tool of insurgency against extractive activities and the advance of the agricultural frontier that threatens these spaces, showing that the territories can be exploited under other approaches and through innovative proposals.

1. Introduction

The UNWTO claims that 2020 was the worst in tourism history. The strong decline in this sector was a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic, reaching a 74% fall in international arrivals and generating economic impacts never seen before [1,2]. The 2020 decline represented a loss 10 times greater than the 4% reduction in 2009 and 1.2% decrease in 2003 [1,3].
Since the gradual opening of borders and the lifting of restrictions in each country, the UNWTO [1] has identified an increase in tourism activities linked to nature, the outdoors, and rurality. For this reason, the development of rural tourism as an alternative to the overcrowded spaces of urban tourism is taking center stage and is established as a lever for the recovery of the economies of small areas, which is a condition that was reaffirmed within the 24th meeting of the UNWTO General Assembly, held during the last month of 2021 [4]. This meeting raised the need for an articulated work that seeks to build the future through the integration of innovative processes that promote the inclusion of vulnerable groups, an increase in the competitiveness of destinations, and the strengthening of entrepreneurship in rural communities to establish tourism as a tool for local development [4,5].
In this context, at the international level, Ecuador reinforces the commitment that began in 2002 when the Tourism Law (Chapter III, Art. 14, item 8) recognized community participation. Subsequently, in mid-2020, through the highest authority of the Ministry of Tourism, the strengthening of rural destinations that were closer to the main urban centers of the country was established as one of the mechanisms for the reactivation of internal tourism [6]. Unlike other countries, Ecuador not only considered rural tourism, but also incorporated community tourism (CT) as a complementary element in the reactivation process.
This type of tourism is based on taking advantage of the numerous natural and cultural resources of the ancestral spaces of the indigenous communities located in the rural areas of the territories. Thus, Ecuador is positioned as a leader in CT [7,8], focused on the generation of tourism enterprises that contribute to improving the quality of life, based on four pillars of work: (a) the management and defense of the ancestral territories inhabited by the country’s peoples and nationalities, (b) the generation of benefits from the protection and preservation of the cultural and natural heritage of the inherited territories, (c) the valuation of culture as a mechanism for the strengthening of identities based on synchronous and asynchronous dimensions, and (d) organizational strengthening for the vindication of collective rights [9,10]. This form of community-based tourism development planning has been considered by the local administration of many countries since the mid-1980s and especially in the 1990s [11,12,13,14,15].
In short, rural tourism and, specifically, community tourism, allows the varied national cultural landscapes to be valued, as they are seen as areas for escaping and disconnecting from the discomforts caused by modernity [16] in a pandemic stage that provides an opportunity for sustainable development of territories. In this context, the aim of this research is to obtain and provide an overview of the current reality of community tourism linked to the Corporation for the Development of Community Tourism of Chimborazo (CORDTUCH), Ecuador. In addition, it will allow us to know to what extent community enterprises that are set up are strengthened over time, highlighting how the practice of CT has evolved from a rudimentary/empirical activity within the Chimborazo area to being currently legally recognized and considered a sector of the local economy. Likewise, the consolidation of the undertakings is detailed, and it reinforces the actions that can be implemented in other territories through the application of participatory action research (PAR), in which it is committed to the reflective and inclusive participation of the local participants and a collective feedback in open plenary.
This article is divided into five sections. The section presented after the introduction defines community tourism and presents the organizations responsible for promoting and strengthening this type of tourism. The third section describes in detail the methodological framework used in the study. The fourth section presents an overview of community tourism linked to CORDTUCH. Finally, the fifth section contains the conclusions.

2. Contextualization of Community Tourism in Chimborazo (Ecuador)

2.1. Community Tourism

It is unquestionable that today tourism enables communities with very limited options to develop economically [17]. This is how community tourism or community-based tourism (CBT) arises, which Maldonado-Erazo et al. [10], Cabanilla [18], Cabanilla and Garrido [19], and Rodas et al. [20] referred to as a management model differentiated from rural tourism (RT), although in its beginnings they emerged as two linked concepts [18,19]. This difference is mainly based on three elements, which are detailed in Table 1.
Community tourism or community-based tourism, according to its acronym in English, does not have a unanimous definition. There are many definitions in the literature. Hausler and Strasdas [22] define it as a form of tourism in which a significant number of local people have substantial control over and participation in its development and management. On the other hand, most of the benefits remain within the local economy. The Netherlands Development Organization (SNV) [23] (p. 10) defines it as “a type of sustainable tourism that promotes strategies in favour of the poor in a community setting,” and to Lopez-Gúzman and Sánchez Cañizares [24], it is “an activity that is based on the creation of tourism products under the basic principle of the necessary participation of the local community” (p. 89). Asker et al. [25] understand it as a form of local tourism that favors local service providers and focuses on interpreting and communicating the local culture and environment.
The specific characteristics of this type of tourism can be observed through the different definitions.
  • It is a type of tourism managed by and for the local community [26,27] as a way of reducing the negative consequences of tourism. Cañada [28] corroborates this statement, since he understands that this type of tourism is based on a tourism management model in which the local population of a given territory, generally a disadvantaged one, plays a leading role in the control of its design, execution, management, and distribution of benefits derived from the tourism activity [29,30,31]. Several studies address the issue of community participation and control [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
  • The participation of the local population (local stakeholders and tourism providers) is one of the pillars on which it is based [40], enabling the empowerment of local communities [38]. Many researchers agree on the need for community involvement in tourism [41,42]. This empowerment is achieved according, to Shafieisabet and Haratifard [43] (p. 76), “through training [44], informing them [45] about available environmental resources [46] and promoting their personal and social characteristics and flexibility in spatial area [47] in order to create a clean and attractive environment for tourists [48] and improve their quality of life by increasing tourism income, which can ensure sustainable rural development in rural settlements along the tourism route and destination [45]”.
  • It is generally a small-scale type of tourism (Asker et al., 2010) that improves indicators related to the quality of life of the local population involved in tourism [49].
  • It stimulates the local economy by increasing income opportunities [50] through the use of local culture and nature. It also favors the equitable redistribution of benefits in the community [22].
  • The benefits derived from its development are manifold:
(1) They favor economic and ecological sustainability [40,51,52] through sustainable tourism, which values and manages cultural and natural heritage properly, allowing for its conservation.
(2) It also provides numerous economic and social benefits [53]. In this regard, the Netherlands Development Organization (SNV) [23] (p. 10) argues that “CBT initiatives aim to involve local residents in the operation and management of small tourism projects as a means of alleviating poverty and providing an alternative source of tourism income for community members.” This is also corroborated by the study conducted by Manu and Kuuder [54], who consider that tourism provides an opportunity to increase income and reduce poverty. Dodds and Garci [38] (p. 65) stated that the specific benefits are “preservation of natural and cultural heritage, increased education, training and skills in business and tourism development, increased employment, economic diversification, improved infrastructure, greater environmental integrity, sharing of culture, reduction of current social problems and allocation of traditional ways of living off the land sustainably.”

2.2. Plurinational Federation of Community Tourism in Ecuador

Ecuador stands out regionally as an icon of community tourism [8,19] thanks to the national consolidation of the Plurinational Federation of Community Tourism of Ecuador (FEPTCE). This federation was created in the late 1980s and during the 1990s through the support and management of indigenous and Afro movements through the Council for the Development of Nationalities and Peoples of Ecuador (CODENPE), the Development Project of Indigenous Peoples and Afro-Ecuadorians (PRODEPINE), and the International Labour Organization (ILO). In 2002, it obtained its official recognition [55] from the Ministry of Tourism (Agreement No. 20020059, dated 11 September 2002, and through the Official Registry No. 43, dated 23 June 2005 of the current statute approved by Agreement No. 20050005) [56].
FEPTCE is committed to disengaging the concept of CT from rural tourism and ecotourism by initiating a crusade to modify the understanding of tourism linked to communities. They leave aside the overcrowding of spaces to reach an articulation of peoples as “subjects” that manage tourism and not “objects” that attract tourism [57]. Thus, FEPTCE becomes a strategic actor, fighting for and consolidating the integration of CT within the Tourism Law of Ecuador [58]. It also works for the integration of tourism, and in particular of CT, within the criteria and working pillars of the national development plans generated by the National Secretariat for Planning and Development [59,60]. Community tourism was established as the fourth axis of the national strategy to achieve a change in the productive matrix and the development of the nation through new products that include added value such as tourism [10,61,62]. It is essential to highlight that tourism, not specifically CT, is still considered within the five program areas of the current plan called Creation Opportunities 2021–2025 [63].
Loor et al. [61] also highlighted that CT, in addition to being one of the lines of the national strategy, achieves recognition as a product line in the country’s Ministry of Tourism plan firstly, within the Strategic Plan for Sustainable Tourism Development for Ecuador 2020 as a strategic actor of the process and specific product, and secondly, in the 2015 Project of Ecuador as tourist power as an element of the cultural heritage value chain, as well as a beneficiary of the strengthening process in the transfer of technical knowledge and the development of skills and abilities of human talent linked to the activity. It also participates in the incentive program, a condition that is detailed in the Institutional Strategic Plan 2009–2021 and is ratified in PLANDETUR 2030 [64,65,66,67].
Within the national territory, the FEPTCE is articulated through nine provincial/cantonal networks, which by 2020 held 121 enterprises, of which 83 are established as active due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2022, there was an increase in the number of enterprises that had achieved community tourism recognition within the National Tourist Cadaster of Establishments of the Ministry of Tourism of Ecuador [68], although 39 registrations remain within this category. It can be seen that 18 FEPTCE enterprises have been categorized as consolidated initiatives by Maldonado-Erazo et al. [10] through the criteria indicated by Ochoa [69]. These enterprises are registered within the consolidated cadaster of the year 2021, representing 46% of the total number of enterprises in the country.
The families articulated to approximately 125 communities [10] are established as the beneficiaries of CT in Ecuador, which in projected data would represent more than 34,000 direct beneficiaries. CT has represented for the communities a way to achieve a better quality of life, because in many cases the unsatisfied basic needs (basic services, housing, health, access to food and information) have presented improvements, decreasing with this internal migration and the feminization of rural areas.

2.3. Corporation for the Development of Community Tourism (CORDTUCH)

The Corporation for the Development of Community Tourism (CORDTUCH) emerged without it being known what tourism was [70]. In the initial stages, the organization of the communities near the access to the snow-capped Chimborazo mountain corresponded to a process of struggle against the expropriation of land belonging to the communities settled in the Chimborazo Fauna Production Reserve (RPFCH). This reserve is a state natural area created in 1987, which was governed by Art. 75 of the Forestry and Conservation of Natural Areas and Wildlife Law of Ecuador [71].
The Chimborazo Community Tourism Organization (ORTUCH) was initiated in 1998 with the participation of 11 communities [70,72]. In the same year, the 20th Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador was proclaimed. This constitution recognizes the multiculturalism of the territory and of the indigenous territorial districts. This as a positive action in favor of Ecuadorian peoples and nationalities. Indigenous and Afro-Ecuadorian movements, together with the Council for the Development of Nationalities and Peoples of Ecuador (CODENPE) and the International Labour Organization (ILO), initiated the process of recognition and legalization of tourism activity in the community context [19].
The FEPTCE, after several processes of insurgency and struggle, succeeded in integrating CT in the Tourism Law [58]. Four years later, the Regulation for the Registration of Community Tourist Centers was issued [73]. This regulation requires proof of the legal existence of the community, a condition that corresponds to the approval of its legal status and statute in accordance with the provisions of the Law on the Organization and Regime of Communes [74].
Barthol et al. [75] considers all these processes new barriers for the exercise of CT activity, due to the fact that acquiring the recognition of these groups as communities represents a highly bureaucratic process, thus limiting the development of more initiatives.
In 2002, the CORTUCH acquired legal status under the collective rights, with an unlimited number of partners and an indefinite duration, becoming the Corporation for the Development of Community Tourism (CORDTUCH), operating in Chimborazo province. The legal status of corporation was, at that time, better adjusted to the numerous processes that the communities wanted to generate. Although the Provincial Directorate of Social Welfare of Chimborazo recognized CORDTUCH through Ministerial Agreement No-019, 18 January 2005, the FEPTCE recognized CORDTUCH as a member on 2 August 2006. Lastly, the official registration of collective rights and the statute in CODENPE was recognized on 21 August 2006, justifying the community quality of the initiative [76,77,78].
CORDTUCH is a community organization (peasant and indigenous communities) in the province of Chimborazo (Figure 1). It was created with the purpose of analyzing the reality of these communities and their problems and proposing solutions. In this process, tourism was identified as a strategy to diversify their productive activities. At present, CORDTUCH is established as a subsidiary organization that provides technical support to the 11 ventures or community tourism organizations (CTOs) distributed according to the detail in Table 2, of which only eight CTOs are operating in in their entirety [79].

3. Methodology

The methodological process was articulated in three stages: diagnosis, strengthening, and monitoring of the social, environmental, organizational, cultural, and economic dimensions of the CTOs linked to CORDTUCH. At the beginning of the study, participatory action research (PAR) was used; an induction on the subject to be dealt with was carried out, with the aim of achieving a reflexive and inclusive participation of the general assemblies, the directors of the CORDTUCH CTOs, and community leaders thus achieving collective feedback in an open plenary session. Eleven general assemblies, one per each organization, were carried out.
The PAR was established as a process of social struggle for Latin America [83]. It generates spaces of trust in which direct information is obtained from the actors involved at different scales of interference, giving value to other forms of knowledge, thereby avoiding a partial vision frequently generated by the colonial vision of the academic [84], because the open plenary process allows everyone to debate the contributions made so that the information reflects the reality of the territories without bias on the part of the observer.
Additionally, research techniques such as documentary review at an exploratory, analytical, and descriptive level were integrated. For the field data collection, which was carried out in 35 communities, surveys and personal interviews were employed. It is important to mention that during the National Health Emergency due to COVID-19, many of the activities in the territory, such as some surveys, interviews, and meetings, were carried out through digital platforms. These research activities were performed in groups of five people on average, who commonly gathered at the community leaders’ houses, because most people in the communities do not have internet access.
The rationale to perform virtual data collection activities responds to the global reality. Research activities during the pandemic have been transformed into much more resilient, supportive, and humane processes that focus on the increase in “cross-border data flows, information and knowledge” [85]. The application processes of the various instruments were carried out by work groups led by the authors, who in turn trained a group of students in which a Kichwa-speaking student was inserted to facilitate dialogue processes in cases. If a translation was required, once the groups were consolidated, the application proceeded. After that, the information was refined and systematized to be analyzed and validated by the groups within the plenaries, from which each work dimension was consolidated.
The basic documentation used to work on the cultural dimension was the Ethnographic Guide of Guerrero [86]; for the social dimension, the Community Cultural Revitalization Manual of Torres [87]; and for the organizational, environmental, and economic dimension, the Guide of Good Practices in Sustainable Tourism for Latin American Communities [88]. It is necessary to specify that the use of this documentation derives from the relevance that the first two sources represent for Ecuador and Latin America as precursors of the decolonial research process.

4. Overview of Community Tourism linked to CORDTUCH

4.1. Social Dimension

The organizational structure maintains community assemblies as the highest decision-making authority, thus consolidating a horizontal relationship that is participatory and consensual and non-hierarchical in nature, in which consensus is essential for making decisions that generate the greatest common benefit [78,89]. Figure 2 shows the representation of time (spiral) and the elements that make up community life, as well as the relationship between them. This vision and graphic was built based on the contributions of community leaders.
It is necessary to specify that the community leaders state that time within the Andean cosmovision is not something linear; it corresponds to a spiral in which elements accumulate (memory and root), which are the dynamics of community. From this logic of movement, the communities organize the work within the territories. In this way, everything in the social dimension revolves around the decisions of the general assembly (integrating all the members of the community), who is the highest authority, and the decisions made by this body are executed by the board of each CTO, expressing a collective participation. The environmental aspect is taken as the maximum expression of the man–nature relationship of mutual respect. In the organizational dimension, the form of collective work in each CTO is respected. In the cultural field, the collective memory is transversely reflected from the conservation of the material cultural heritage and the safeguarding of the intangible heritage to finally articulate the three previous dimensions in the economic use that the spaces can achieve through the product CT marketed by CTOs.
It should be noted that within the organization, women’s and young people’s participation is encouraged, with the purpose of consolidating a gender and generational relationship [78] that has been consolidated over the course of the organization’s 15 years of existence. Women have taken on a more prominent role, managing to integrate important spaces of the organization´s various boards of directors, thereby encouraging the integration of these groups, which have been neglected in the production processes of tourism activity. Currently, the destinations show processes of social equity with a clear participation of women, where at least 25% of the services are executed by women, in addition to having at least one woman within the community directives. There is also evidence of a 10% increase in academic training processes for higher studies and 50% in certification processes for local guides, to the extent of the accessibility of new technologies they have provided.

4.2. Environmental Dimension

The CORDTUCH, as mentioned above, was created with the aim of protecting the natural spaces of the Chimborazo Fauna Production Reserve (RPFCH), after several insurgency processes for the vindication of collective rights over their ancestral spaces. This organization was incorporated as an active agent within the RPFCH management programs linked to wildlife management, protection of natural resources, and tourism [79].
Based on this connection, work has been done to reduce and prevent the problems identified in Table 3, which was built from the general explanation of the main problems of the territory identified by the Ministry of the Environment, Water and Ecological Transition. After that, these were prioritized by the groups based on the expertise and knowledge of the areas.
Following the process of identifying the environmental problems in CTOs, work has been done to implement mitigation and prevention measures, among which the following stand out:
  • Forestation and reforestation: action implemented in the 11 CTOs. It corresponds to the implementation of small forest nurseries of native species, transplanted to eroded and deforested areas and even to family plots to be used as live fences for the protection of crops. This activity has also generated extra income from the commercialization of species.
  • Management of páramo, natural areas, and micro-watersheds: implementation of strategies for the management of páramo as a source of water and reduction of the livestock load corresponding to cattle and sheep, which was replaced by camelids (llama and alpaca). It is also responsible for formulating regulations to control the burning of grasslands and the fencing off of water sources. These actions were implemented in Guarguallá, UCASAJ, Casa Cóndor, CEDEIN, and Chuquipogio, which are all areas of influence of Sangay National Park and RPFCH.
  • Recovery of water sources: This is linked to the recovery of hectares of cushion and grassy páramo ecosystems, which are established as sources of water reserves, for which work has been done with the insertion of camelids and the declaration of communal conservation areas.
  • Organic production: incorporation of ancestral practices to strengthen agriculture, allowing the generation of agroecological gardens, mainly in UCASAJ, CEDEIN, Balda Lupaxi, Casa Cóndor, and Razu Ñan, an activity that is currently linked to the tourist offer of the communities.
  • Waste management: implementation of recycling processes and composting processes to obtain organic fertilizer, in which the local population has been involved, especially children in Razu Ñan and Balda Lupaxi. This action has made it possible to improve the condition of the cultural landscape.
The processes of identification of environmental impacts have allowed the articulation of environmental education processes, but in the future, they awaken the need to study the relationship between climate change and CT, mainly in the communities that appear as protectors of ancestral zones.

4.3. Organizational Dimension

In relation to the administrative system, CORDTUCH establishes a board of directors composed of five members, which are president and vice president, together with the marketing, finance, and communications secretaries [91] (Figure 3).
The largest area is the marketing secretariat, made up of:
  • Operadora de Turismo Puruhá Razurku: Created in 2006, this company’s purpose is the commercialization of tourism products generated by the 11 OTCs [91]. The first package that was sold had a cost of USD 70 and left a net profit of USD 15; the rest was given to the community that hosted the tourist [72]. Within the work structure, it is made up of four employees [92].
  • Caja de Ahorros Tayta Chimborazo: It started its activities in 2018, being established as a non-profit community entity [91] that is in charge of contributing to the financial management of the organization’s funds, subsidiaries, and future ventures. It is composed of two employees [92].
  • Bioproducts shop: Created in 2010, its purpose is to contribute to the marketing chain of organic and artisanal products generated by the communities linked to the organization [82,91]. It is attached to the tour operator, although commercial activity is at a standstill, as it is not in operation.
The identification of its organizational structure is strengthened by inter-institutional connections. In this aspect, it was possible to identify the reactivation of the Tourism Management Committee of the Province of Chimborazo in 2019. At this stage, only representatives of the public and private tourism sector participated in its recent activation, the same that was created in 2015 by Ordinance No. 13-2015-GADPCH, creating the right conditions to integrate the community tourism sector in the province in the organizational figure of CORDTUCH.
Within this dimension, we also contributed to strengthening the capabilities of human talent linked to the organization, which was developed during the year 2020. This process began with an evaluation of the job performance of all staff, reaching 119/215 points. This rating shows a level of performance that is not very efficient, due to the fact that there are positions that assume many functions, or on the contrary, positions with a single function because they voluntarily contribute to the management of the organization [91].
Based on this ex ante evaluation, a training program was consolidated for the 11 CTOs, made up of 7 academic programs organized into 28 modules. They cover issues of tourism and biosafety, tourism legislation, accounting, auditing, taxation, design, administration, operation, and marketing of tourism products. The program could not yet be implemented due to the National Health Emergency, an element that prevents agglomeration processes, as well as the fact that it cannot be developed virtually due to the limited digital coverage of the territories. However, the entire execution planning was defined, in addition to establishing an ex post evaluation system focused on qualitative and quantitative indicators for each academic program, which will provide feedback for the corporation once it is implemented [92], because the main limitation for the current implementation of this training process has been the lack of digital coverage in all the communities, a condition that would handicap certain organizations.

4.4. Cultural Dimension

Within the cultural component, the organization established a strong process of conservation and safeguarding of cultural heritage based on revitalization processes, in which the recreation of ancestral knowledge and know-how linked to language, clothing, craft techniques, and oral tradition was achieved [78], allowing this heritage to be kept alive.
Another action was the training of 39 local guides during 2019 through the Local Guide course, supported by the Ministry of Tourism of Ecuador and taught by 12 professors from the Faculty of Natural Resources and one professor from the Faculty of Business Administration linked to the Higher Polytechnic School of Chimborazo (ESPOCH). They received training linked to components of culture, environment, and management. As part of the cultural training, they received elements to strengthen their identity based on anthropological work processes, in addition to building knowledge based on the history and cultural heritage of the area.
Subsequently, a process for the registration of tangible assets, both movable and immovable, of five of the organization’s CTOs was articulated. This process was only consolidated with this small group, as it was carried out during the National Health Emergency process due to COVID-19, preventing a total displacement to the territory and limiting it to the digital connection processes available. During this activity, the bonds of belonging to the material cultural heritage (MCH) of the territories were strengthened through both face-to-face and virtual work. Participatory workshops were held involving community leaders, who provided their homes as a meeting point for Zoom connections. The movable and immovable assets were identified, and later, through fieldwork, physical or ethnographic data were collected to fill out the registration forms. A year later, the process was complemented with audiovisual documentation of heritage elements. This whole process was based on prior, free, and informed consent, which complies with the provisions of the ILO Convention No. 169 [93], the Nagoya Protocol [94], and Código Ingenios of Ecuador [95], thereby establishing a whole system for the protection of collective rights (Table 4).
Furthermore, within the intangible cultural heritage (ICH), the following CTOs have a safeguarding plan: Razu Ñan, UCASAJ, Chuquipogio, Nizag, Calshi, Quilla Pacari, and Sumak kawsay. As mentioned by Piray et al. [78], the safeguard processes allowed the revitalization of several manifestations within the six areas of the ICH as a result of the tourist practice (Table 5).
The process of recreating the memory allowed for coordinated work, with an emphasis on the orality of the community imagination, as an inheritance for the younger generations, allowing in 2016 the participatory, documented, and illustrated creation of the book Cuentos Andinos. This book collects 11 stories from the affiliated organizations of CORDTUCH. This activity generated a profound process of assessing the stories of older adults, as well as a process of creative return to organizations through the staging of 11 plays in the community territories, which has allowed for the generation of several initiatives such as sales and the creation of audiobooks and content for distribution on social networks, generating occasional economic income for the organization and recreating moments or talks of reflection in different visits to the territories.
The CTOs still continue to observe a process of cultural erosion linked to migratory processes, for higher education or for work, the latter largely exacerbated by the National Health Emergency, a condition that leads to the future generation of research that allows generational transmission processes to be strengthened through other mechanisms, including digital ones.

4.5. Economic Dimension

During the process of strengthening CORDTUCH, a direct benefit of 1772 members of the 11 CTOs and the Association of Tourist Guides of Chimborazo (AGUITUCH) was achieved, as well as around 5700 indirect beneficiaries, including inhabitants of the communities where community tourism organizations and tourists specializing in this type of sustainable tourism are located.
To establish the tourist offer of the CTOs, an analysis of the tourism system was carried out, initially identifying a total of 78 tourist attractions, as well as the presence of a tourist plant linked to food, accommodation, and guidance (Table 6), which have been integrated into five products marketed through Puruhá Razurku Tourism Operator (Table 7), according to information provided by CORDTUCH in the interviews carried out through digital platforms, through which a total income was obtained for a value of USD 37,459.26 for the year 2019 as the latest consolidated data, of which 80% have been delivered in the form of direct payments to the communities.
Furthermore, it is necessary to add that of the training process for local guides, a total of 22 participants were members of the CTOs, 14 were linked to AGUITUCH, and 3 were associated with community initiatives not linked to CORDTUCH. Twenty-four participants of the total number achieved a local guide license from the National Tourism Authority, with 15 still pending (Table 8).
Finally, this process strengthens the insertion of new guides in the organizations, responding to the need for generational change, recognizing that some current leaders of the organizations were trained in 1998 as native guides by the Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, and that in 2019, this forged job opportunities in the community territories, which initiated tourism activities in the province.

5. Discussion

Tourism experienced the greatest turning point in its history, which motivated the rethinking of work objectives. That is, the consolidation of sustainable tourism through innovation, the linking of neglected groups, and investment in communities was proposed in order to generate a resilient future. Ecuador as a leading country in community tourism or community-based tourism (CBT) stands out due to the wide variety of tourism enterprises that resulted from the multiple processes of insurgency and vindication for collective rights of local communities and indigenous, Afro-Ecuadorian, and Montubio peoples and nationalities, which have consolidated a solid organizational system based on the FEPTCE. Linked to this process, multiple networks were articulated in the national territory, one of which is CORDTUCH, which brings together several peasant and indigenous communities in the province of Chimborazo.
CORDTUCH has been the main object of study, and after the support process for its strengthening, the following contributions derived from the research process have been consolidated:
At first, poverty is established as a circumstantial concept for the indigenous worldview, which is not understood as something strictly material, but rather as the lack or absence of putting into action all the knowledge they possess for the prevention of bad scenarios [100], which is based on the Alli Kawsay. Alli Kawsay is the basic condition for the management of sustenance and the autonomous resolution of the needs of communities through the adaptation of knowledge to the environmental conditions. In this way, the recognition of the value of their culture and the Pachamama, together with the recognition of the problems that are afflicting them, has motivated the strengthening of social demands to put aside this poverty circumstance.
CT has taught us to work with communities through cultural encounter actions, in which differences are respected and communities begin to be understood as subjects with the capacity to bring change in their territories, and not as numbers or objects. Each subject can contribute the necessary knowledge to overcome this circumstantial poverty, since they have the knowledge and wisdom to organize the spaces, observing that 90% of the research process has been generated by the communities and 10% by the academy.
CT confirms that it is not only the generation of a business, but also the definition of an organizational process, which protects the territories, strengthens the capacities of the communities, and safeguards ancestral knowledge. CT was born without being a business, without a tourism product, and was built collectively with failures and successes, and now it is a management model with a differentiated tourism product and identity. During this construction process, it was observed that the link between tourism and economic activities is not only as a generator of foreign currency, but also as the possibility of living in dignity, through the satisfaction of the basic needs of the spaces, in order to strengthen the achievement of Alli Kawsay.
In addition to this, gender equity and generational participation have made it possible for 55% of the participants in this type of tourism to be women, with at least one leader in decision-making spaces, who have become direct producers, in addition to allowing a reinforcement of the cosmic and ancestral vision of the duality of men and women, demonstrating that they are complementary and indivisible, which is why CT has managed to make progress in the consolidation of rights in the territory.
All of the above is supported by what was mentioned by Graci [101], i.e., that the empowerment of communities for the development of CT allowed the generation of the necessary means to have a sustainable life. That is why from this process, these enterprises produced an important local economic revitalization. It contributed to the generation of jobs and to reducing migration to the city or to other countries, which resulted in 1772 direct beneficiaries among the five cantons of the province of Chimborazo, where the network is based, in addition to approximately 1867 families as indirect beneficiaries through the production of handicrafts and cultivation of medicinal plants, among other activities [79]. From the sale of tourist packages, the communities have received 80% of the income from sales.
Despite the difficulties and legislative updates, this corporation—CORDTUCH—has managed to consolidate and duly legalize its 11 CTO ventures, while the remaining organizations are in the process of consolidation.
Based on this process, it is recommended to continue strengthening alliances between the private, public, and community sectors, with the purpose of reducing dependence on the central government and thereby increasing the self-sufficiency of spaces through active participation in all events planned by the organization or those to which it has been invited, since these are the appropriate scenarios for strengthening their institutional situation.
Moreover, although the CT market is growing, it is necessary to consolidate a marketing process that identifies specific market niches and sound investment strategies in order to capture more demand and increase sales volumes. To this end, it is recommended to continue with the generation and strengthening of local capacities, the improvement of their infrastructure and tourist plants, and the innovation of their products, taking into account the changes in the tastes and preferences of the demand in order to better satisfy the expectations of the visit.
Finally, it is essential to work on the development of new mechanisms and tools for managing information in all areas of work, which would facilitate the monitoring and evaluation of all the activities and projects undertaken by communities. As future lines of research, it would be interesting to delve into volunteer tourism in the context of community tourism for the economic reactivation of communities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.P.M.-E., S.P.M.-S., N.P.T.-T. and M.d.l.C.d.R.-R.; formal analysis, C.P.M.-E., S.P.M.-S., N.P.T.-T. and M.d.l.C.d.R.-R.; investigation, C.P.M.-E., S.P.M.-S., N.P.T.-T. and M.d.l.C.d.R.-R.; methodology, C.P.M.-E., S.P.M.-S., N.P.T.-T. and M.d.l.C.d.R.-R.; writing—original draft, C.P.M.-E., S.P.M.-S., N.P.T.-T. and M.d.l.C.d.R.-R.; writing—review and editing, C.P.M.-E., S.P.M.-S., N.P.T.-T. and M.d.l.C.d.R.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Special recognition to the linkage project “Strengthening community tourism in the Province of Chimborazo” from the Polytechnic Higher School of Chimborazo.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. UNWTO. UNWTO World Tourism Barometer and Statistical Annex, December 2020; UNWTO World Tourism Barometer: Madrid, Spain, 2020; Volume 18, pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. ONU. UNWTO: International Tourism Registered in 2003 the Greatest Setback in History. UN News Noticias ONU. 2004. Available online: https://news.un.org/es/story/2004/01/1028571 (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  3. UNWTO. 2020: The Worst Year in the History of Tourism, with One Billion Fewer International Arrivals; UNWTO World Tourism Barometer: Madrid, Spain, 2021; Available online: https://thediplomatinspain.com/en/2021/01/2020-worst-year-in-tourism-history-with-1-billion-fewer-international-arrivals/ (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  4. UNWTO. 24a Reunión de la Asamblea General de la OMT. 2021. Available online: https://www.unwto.org/es/24-reunion-de-la-asamblea-general-de-la-omt/sesion-tematica (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  5. Nexotur. The UNWTO Looks towards a Green and Inclusive Tourism. Nexotur. 2021. Available online: https://www.unwto.org/news/unwto-points-tourism-towards-a-greener-inclusive-future-at-general-assembly (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  6. Ministry of Tourism of Ecuador. Turismo Rural Será Clave Para la Reactivación del Sector Post COVID-19/Rural Tourism Will Be Key to the Reactivation of the Post-COVID-19 Sector. 2020. Available online: https://www.turismo.gob.ec/turismo-rural-sera-clave-para-la-reactivacion-del-sector-post-covid-19/ (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  7. Bravo, E.F.O.; Sánchez, L.D.R.F.; Belema, L.A.A.; Viteri, X.A.S. Gestión del turismo comunitario en el sector indígena de la provincia de chimborazo caso: La Moya. Explor. Digit. 2020, 4, 6–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vargas-Cumbajín, C.; Yánez-Segovia, S.; Hernández-Benalcázar, H.; Méndez-Játiva, J.F.; Valdiviezo-Leroux, W.; Tafur, V. La situación del turismo comunitario en Ecuador. Dominio Cienc. 2018, 4, 80–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. FEPTCE. Guia de Turismo Comunitario del Ecuador; Imprenta Mariscal: Quito, Ecuador, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  10. Maldonado-Erazo, C.P.; del Río-Rama, M.D.L.C.; Noboa-Viñan, P.; Álvarez-García, J. Community-based tourism in Ecuador: Community ventures of the provincial and cantonal networks. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Redclift, M.; Springett, D. Routledge International Handbook of Sustainable Development; Routledge: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lalayan, A. Community Based Tourism in Armenia: Planning for Sustainable Deveopment. Ph.D. Thesis, Asia Pacific University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fayos-Sola, E. Knowledge Management in Tourism: Policy and Governance Applications; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bradford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sharpley, R.; Telfer, D.J. Tourism and Development: Concepts and Issues; Channel View Publications: Bristol, UK, 2015; Volume 63. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rodríguez, I.; Williams, A.M.; Hall, C.M. Tourism innovation policy: Implementation and outcomes. Ann. Tour. Res. 2014, 49, 76–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hutchins, F. Footprints in the forest: Ecotourism and altered meanings in Ecuador’s upper Amazon. J. Lat. Am. Caribb. Anthropol. 2007, 12, 75–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Benson, A.; Clifton, J. Assessing tourism’s impacts using local communities’ attitudes toward the environment. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 76, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cabanilla, E. Turismo comunitario en América Latina, un concepto en construcción. Siembra 2018, 5, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cabanilla, E.; Garrido, C. El Turismo Comunitario en el Ecuador: Evolución, Problemática Y Desafios; Velásquez, F., Ed.; UIDE: Quito, Ecuador, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rodas, M.; Ullauri, N.; Sanmartín, I. El turismo comunitario en el Ecuador: Una revisión de la literatura. RICIT Rev. Tur. Desarro. Y Buen Vivir 2015, 9, 60–78. [Google Scholar]
  21. Valdez, D.; Ochoa, B. Turismo Rural. Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora. 2015. Available online: www.itson.mx (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  22. Häusler, N.; Strasdas, W. Training Manual for Community-Based Tourism. Addendum to The Ecotourism Training Manual for Protected Area Management; InWEnt—Capacity Building International: Bonn, Germany, 2003; Available online: https://cupdf.com/document/ecotourismtrainingmanual-cbt.html?page=1 (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  23. Netherlands Development Organization (SNV). Asia Pro-Poor Sustainable Tourism Network. A Toolkit for Monitoring and Managing Community-Based Tourism; SNV Asia Pro-Poor Sustainable Tourism Network and Griffith University: Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  24. López-Guzmán, T.; Sánchez Cañizares, S.M. Turismo comunitario y generación de riqueza en países en vías de desarrollo. Un estudio de caso en el Salvador. REVESCO Rev. Estud. Coop. 2009, 30, 85–103. [Google Scholar]
  25. Asker, S.; Boronyak, L.; Carrard, N.; Paddon, M. Effective Community Based Tourism: A Good Practice Manual; CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd.: Parkwood, QLD, Australia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kavita, E.; Saarinen, J. Tourism and rural community development in Namibia: Policy issues review. Fenn.-Int. J. Geogr. 2015, 194, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Scheyvens, R. Promoting women’s empowerment through involvement in ecotourism: Experiences from the third world. J. Sustain. Tour. 2000, 8, 232–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cañada, E. Turismo en Centroamérica. Un Diagnóstico Para el Debate; Editorial Enlace: Managua, Nicaragua, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sutawa, G.K. Issues on Bali tourism development and community empowerment to support sustainable tourism development. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2012, 4, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Van Breugel, L. Community-based tourism: Local participation and perceived impacts. Ph.D. Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  31. Strzelecka, M.; Boley, B.B.; Strzelecka, C. Empowerment and resident support for tourism in rural Central and Eastern Europe (CEE): The case of Pomerania, Poland. J. Sustain. Tour. 2017, 25, 554–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Altman, J.C. People on country, healthy landscapes and sustainable indigenous economic futures: The arnhem land case. Draw. Board Aust. Rev. Public Aff. 2003, 4, 65–82. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zeppel, H. Indigenous Ecotourism: Sustainable Development and Management; CABI Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeppel, H. Indigenous ecotourism: Conservation and resource rights. In Critical Issues in Ecotourism: Understanding a Complex Tourism Phenomenon; Higham, J.E.S., Ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Burlington, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 308–348. [Google Scholar]
  35. Colton, J.W. Indigenous tourism development in northern Canada: Beyond economic incentives. Can. J. Nativ. Stud. 2005, 1, 185–206. [Google Scholar]
  36. Salole, M. Merging Two disparate worlds in rural Namibia: Joint venture tourism in torra conservancy. In Tourism and Indigenous Peoples: Issues and Implications; Butler, R., Hinch, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Burlington, Vermont, 2007; pp. 205–219. [Google Scholar]
  37. Colton, J.W.; Whitney-Squire, K. Exploring the relationship between aboriginal tourism and community development. Leisure/Loisir 2010, 34, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dodds, R.; Graci, S. Sustainable tourism in island destinations. Routledge: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hipwell, W.T. Taiwan aboriginal ecotourism: Tanayiku natural ecology park. Annals Tour. Res. 2007, 34, 876–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hall, C.M. Introduction to Tourism in Australia: Impacts, Planning and Development; Addison, Wesley and Longman: Melbourne, Australia, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hardy, A.L.; Beeton, R.J. Sustainable tourism or maintainable tourism: Managing resources for more than average outcomes. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 9, 168–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Telfer, D.J. The Evolution of Tourism Development Theory. In Tourism Development, Concepts and Issues; Sharpley, R., Telfer, D., Eds.; Channel View Publications: Clevendon, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 35–81. [Google Scholar]
  43. Shafieisabet, N.; Haratifard, S. Community-based tourism: An approach for sustainable rural development (Case study: Asara district, chalous road). J. Sustain. Rural Dev. 2019, 3, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lucchetti, V.G.; Font, X. Community based tourism: Critical success factors. Int. Cent. Responsib. Tour. 2013, 27, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  45. Muigua, K. Empowering the kenyan people through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. In Proceedings of the CIArb Africa Region Centenary Conference, London, UK, 1–3 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
  46. Park, E.; Kim, S. Enhancing local community’s involvement and empowerment through practicing Cittaslow: Experiences from Goolwa. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conferenece on Tourism Research (4ICTR), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 9–11 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zuo, B.; Gusoy, D.; Wall, G. Residents’ support for red tourism in China: The moderating effect of central government. Annals Tour. Res. 2017, 64, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chin, C.H.; Lo, M.C.; Ramayah, T. Rural tourism sustainable management and destination marketing efforts: Key factors from communities’ perspective. J. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 9, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Hatipoglu, B.; Ertuna, B.; Sasidharan, V. A referential methodology for education on sustainable tourism development. Sustainability 2014, 6, 5029–5048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Codespa, F. Programa RUTAS: La Apuesta por un Turismo Inclusivo en Latinoamérica. Metodología para el Fortalecimiento de Iniciativas de Turismo Rural Comunitario; CAF-Fundación CODESPA and Development Bank Of Latinamerica: Madrid, Spain, 2013; Available online: https://www.codespa.org/app/uploads/metodologia-para-el-fortalecimiento-de-iniciativas-de-turismo-rural-comunitario.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  51. Waligo, V.M.; Clarke, J.; Hawkins, R. Implementing sustainable tourism: A multi-stakeholder involvement management framework. Tour. Manag. 2013, 36, 342–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Muresan, I.C.; Oroian, C.F.; Harun, R.; Arion, F.H.; Porutiu, A.; Chiciudean, G.O.; Todea, A.; Lile, R. Local residents’ attitude toward sustainable rural tourism development. Sustainability 2016, 8, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Wall, G.; Mathieson, A. Tourism: Change, Impacts, and Opportunities; Pearson Education: Madrid, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  54. Manu, I.; Kuuder, C.J.W. Community-based ecotourism and livelihood enhancement in Sirigu, Ghana. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2012, 2, 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  55. United Nations Development Programme. Multinational Federation of Community Tourism in Ecuador (FEPTCE). Local Sustainable Development Solutions for People, Nature, and Resilient Communities; Equator Initiative Case Study Series: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  56. FEPTCE. Proyecto: Código de Operaciones de la Federación Plurinacional de Turismo Comunitario del Ecuador 2011/2013. 2010. Available online: https://es.scribd.com/document/313836878/Codigo-de-Operaciones-Feptce (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  57. Carpentier, J. El turismo comunitario y sus nuevos actores: El caso de las petroleras en la Amazonia ecuatoriana. In Amazonía, Viajeros, Turistas y Poblaciones Indígenas; Valcuende del Rio, J.M., Ed.; Pasos: Quito, Ecuador, 2012; pp. 293–328. Available online: https://hal-univ-paris10.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01632040 (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  58. Tourism Law of Ecuador. Registro Oficial Suplemento No. 733, 27 de diciembre de 2002. Available online: https://www.turismo.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LEY-DE-TURISMO.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  59. SENPLADES. Plan Nacional del Buen Vivir (PNBV) 2009–2013; SENPLADES: Quito, Ecuador, 2009; Available online: https://www.planificacion.gob.ec/plan-nacional-para-el-buen-vivir-2009-2013/ (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  60. SENPLADES. Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir 2013–2017; SENPLADES: Quito, Ecuador, 2013. Available online: http://documentos.senplades.gob.ec/Plan Nacional Buen Vivir 2013-2017.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  61. Loor, L.; Plaza, N.; Medina, Z. Turismo comunitario en Ecuador: Apuntes en tiempos de pandemia. Rev. Cienc. Soc. 2021, 27, 265–277. [Google Scholar]
  62. SENPLADES. Transformación de la Matriz Productiva; SENPLADES: Quito, Ecuador, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  63. National Secretariat for Planning. Plan de Creación de Oportunidades 2021–2025. 2021. Available online: https://www.planificacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Plan-de-Creación-de-Oportunidades-2021-2025-Aprobado.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  64. Ministry of Tourism of Ecuador. PLANDETUR 2020; Ministerio de Turismo: Quito, Ecuador, 2007.
  65. Ministry of Tourism of Ecuador. Proyecto Ecuador Potencia Turística 2015; Ministerio de Turismo: Quito, Ecuador, 2015. Available online: https://www.turismo.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Documento-Proyecto-Ecuador-Pote%0Ancia-Turística.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  66. Ministry of Tourism of Ecuador. Plan Estratégico Institucional 2019–2021; Ministerio de Turismo: Quito, Ecuador, 2019.
  67. Ministry of Tourism of Ecuador. Plan Nacional de Turismo 2030; Ministerio de Turismo: Quito, Ecuador, 2019. Available online: https://www.turismo.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/PLAN-NACIONAL-DE-TURISMO-2030-v.-final-Registro-Oficial-sumillado-comprimido_compressed.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  68. Ministry of Tourism of Ecuador. Catastro Turístico Nacional de Establecimientos; Ministerio de Turismo: Quito, Ecuador, 2021. Available online: https://servicios.turismo.gob.ec/portfolio/catastro-turistico-nacional (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  69. Ochoa, W. Guía Básica de Estudio de Turismo Comunitario Y Solidario; FEPTCE: Quito, Ecuador, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  70. Guamán, M.A. El Turismo Comunitario: Alcances, Limitaciones Y Propuesta de Desarrollo en la Provincia de Chimborazo; Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo: Quito, Ecuador, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  71. The Forestry and Conservation of Natural Areas and Wildlife Law of Ecuador. Ley No. 74. RO/64 de 24 de Agosto. 1981. Available online: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/4033.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  72. CORDTUCH. Chimborazo Desde Adentro; CORDTUCH—Corporación para el Desarrollo de Turismo Comunitario de Chimborazo: Quito, Ecuador, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  73. Regulation for the Registration of Community Tourist Centres. 2006. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC066227/ (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  74. Law on the Organization and Regime of Communes. 2004. Available online: https://www.gob.ec/regulaciones/ley-organizacion-regimen-comunas (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  75. Barthol, R.; Sansolo, D.; Bursztyn, I. Turismo de Base Comunitária: Diversidade de Olhares E Experiências Brasileiras; Ministerio do Turismo, Ed.; Ministerio do Turismo: Brasilia, Brazil, 2009. Available online: http://www.each.usp.br/turismo/livros/turismo_de_base_comunitaria_bartholo_sansolo_bursztyn.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  76. Acuerdo Ministerial 235. 2006; Ministerio de Ecuador. Available online: https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2018/11/Acuerdo-Ministerial-Nro.-235-Delegaciones.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  77. CORDTUCH. Chimborazo Turismo Comunitario; CORDTUCH—Corporación para el Desarrollo de Turismo Comunitario de Chimborazo: Quito, Ecuador, 2019; Available online: https://issuu.com/cordtuch.org/docs/revista_chimborazo_desde_adentro2_05d78b620ee5b8 (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  78. Piray, M.; Tierra-Tierra, N.; Bautista, M.; Lasluisa, M.; Guamán, M.; Aymacaña, C.; Noboa, P.; Tenemasa, A. Sistematización de las Experiencias de Turismo Comunitario de la Provincia de Chimborazo. MKT: Descubre. Comercialización Investigación & Negocios, (3232-12): Riobamba, Ecuador, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  79. Equator Initiative. Corporación para el Desarrollo de Turismo Comunitario de Chimborazo. 2020; Available online: https://www.equatorinitiative.org/2020/04/24/solution11244/ (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  80. Araque, S.M. Diseño de un Sistema de Señalética Turística para las Operaciones de Turismo Comunitario; CORDTUCH: Riobamba, Ecuador, 2012; Available online: http://dspace.espoch.edu.ec/handle/123456789/1838 (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  81. Secretary of Human Rights; Directorio de Organizaciones Sociales. Sistemda Unificado de Información de las Organizaciones Sociales. 2002. Available online: https://sociedadcivil.gob.ec/nuevo_directorio (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  82. Alvarado, E. Evaluación Para el Fortalecimiento de la Corporación Para el Desarrollo del Turismo Comunitario (CORDTUCH) en el Ámbito Gerencial Y de Marketing, Provincia de Chimborazo; CORDTUCH: Riobamba, Ecuador, 2008; Available online: http://dspace.espoch.edu.ec/handle/123456789/8400 (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  83. Pastor-Alfonso, M.J.; Espeso-Molinero, P. Capacitación turística en comunidades indígenas. Un caso de investigación acción participativa (IAP). El Periplo Sustentable Rev. Tur. Desarro. Compet. 2015, 29, 171. [Google Scholar]
  84. Skewes, J.C.; Guerra, D.E. The defense of maiquillahue bay: Knowledge, faith, and identity in an environmental conflict. Ethnology 2004, 43, 217–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Xu, X. El impacto de la pandemia del COVID-19 en la investigación mundial. High. Educ. 2020, 104, 18–20. [Google Scholar]
  86. Guerrero, A. La Cultura. Estrategias Conceptuales Para Entender la Identidad, la Diversidad, la Alteridad Y la Diferencia; Abya-Yala: Quito, Ecuador, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  87. Torres, V. Community Cultural Revitalization Manual of Torres/ Manual de Revitalización Cultura Comunitaria; Comunicec: Quito, Ecuador, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  88. SNV. Guía de Buenas Prácticas de Turismo Sostenible para Comunidades de Latinoaméricana/Guide of Good Practices in Sustainable Tourism for Latin American Communities; SNV-Rainforest Alliance-Counterpart International: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  89. Miranda-Salazar, S.; Tierra-Tierra, N.; Lozano-Rodríguez, P.; Tayupanda-Pagalo, M. Turismo comunitario en los andes ecuatorianos. Estudio de caso: Legalización de las organizaciones filiales de la corporación para el desarrollo de turismo comunitario de chimborazo, provincia de Chimborazo, Ecuador. Polo Del Conoc. 2021, 6, 81–107. [Google Scholar]
  90. Calderón, M. Diseño de un Plan de Gestión y Educación Ambiental para Mejorar la Oferta Turística de los Once Centros de Turismo Comunitario Filiales a la Corporación para el Desarrollo de Turismo Comunitario de Chimborazo; CORDTUCH: Riobamba, Ecuador, 2012; Available online: http://dspace.espoch.edu.ec/handle/123456789/776 (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  91. Gómez, T. Elaboración del Plan de Capacitación Para el Fortalecimiento Organizativo de la Corporación Para el Desarrollo del Turismo Comunitario de Chimborazo; CORDTUCH: Riobamba, Ecuador, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  92. Miranda-Salazar, S.; Rodríguez, P.X.; Flores-Mancheno, A.C.; Gómez-Álvarez, T.A. Fortalecimiento organizativo de la Corporación para el Desarrollo de Turismo Comunitario de la provincia de Chimborazo, Ecuador. Dominio Cienc. 2021, 7, 802–821. [Google Scholar]
  93. ILO Convention, No. 169. 1989. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---americas/---ro-lima/documents/publication/wcms_445528.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  94. Nagoya Protocol. Protocolo de Nagoya Sobre Acceso a Los Recursos Genéticos y Participación Justa y Equitativa en Los Beneficios Que Se Deriven de Su Utilización al Convenio Sobre la Diversidad Biológica; Secretaria del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica Naciones Unidas, Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2011; Available online: https://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-es.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  95. Código Ingenios of Ecuador. Código Orgánico de la Economía Social de los Conocimientos, Creatividad e Innovación. 09 de 12. Asamblea Nacional de la Republica de Ecuador. Official Registration of 9 December 2016. Available online: https://www.asle.ec/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ingenios-09-12-2016.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  96. Castillo-Vizuete, D.; Miranda-Salazar, S.; Jara-Santillán, C.; Quevedo-Baez, L. Cartografía Patrimonial Y de Turismo Comunitario Provincia de Chimborazo; Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo: Chimborazo, Ecuador, 2018; Available online: https://www.academia.edu/38559849/Cartograf%C3%ADa_patrimonial_y_de_turismo_comunitario_provincia_de_Chimborazo (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  97. Llanga, R. Análisis de la Situación Actual del Turismo Comunitario Articulado a Áreas Protegidas en la Provincia de Chimborazo; Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo: Chimborazo, Ecuador, 2017; Available online: http://dspace.espoch.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/8394/1/23T0651.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  98. Travel Agencies Finder. Cordtuch—Turismo Comunitario de Chimborazo. 2022. Available online: https://www.travelagenciesfinder.com/EC/Riobamba/708786192592282/Cordtuch---Turismo-Comunitario-de-Chimborazo (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  99. Community Tourism Operator “Puruhá Razurku”. 2022. Available online: https://www.fairtrips.com/hosts/puruha-razurku (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  100. Viteri Gualinga, C. Visión indígena del desarrollo en la Amazonía. Polis Rev. Latinoam. 2002, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  101. Graci, S. Putting community based tourism into practice: The case of the Cree Village Ecolodge in Moose Factory, Ontario. Téoros Rev. Rech. Tour. 2012, 31, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. CTO location map from CORDTUCH. Source: Alvarado [82].
Figure 1. CTO location map from CORDTUCH. Source: Alvarado [82].
Sustainability 14 04314 g001
Figure 2. Representation of community life (space–time).
Figure 2. Representation of community life (space–time).
Sustainability 14 04314 g002
Figure 3. CORDTUCH structural organization chart. Source: Miranda-Salazar et al. [92].
Figure 3. CORDTUCH structural organization chart. Source: Miranda-Salazar et al. [92].
Sustainability 14 04314 g003
Table 1. Conceptual differences between RT and CT.
Table 1. Conceptual differences between RT and CT.
Rural Tourism (RT)Community Tourism (CT) or Community-Based Tourism (CBT)
It takes place in locations of tourist interest that are a counterpoint to urban centers. As the definition is complex, it is necessary to establish what “rural” is. This will largely depend on the realities established by each territory.It takes place within peoples or nationalities, as well as in spaces legally recognized as local communities, with strong ties of cultural identity between the members of the human group and the surrounding heritage.
Reduced number of service providers for tourists, but with a variety of products, in addition to being in harmony with the infrastructures of the area.Limited tourism offer that depends on the organizational capacity of the community and that is restricted to the resources of the area, where the infrastructures are committed to the integration of designs with permaculture.
Optimum use of the natural and cultural resources of the area by integrating the precepts of sustainability through the local population´s knowledge. Use of the cultural and natural heritage based on heritage processes led by the community members that consolidate a comprehensive sustainability process.
Vertical management model linked to a market economy that takes care of the individual interests of the participants in the tourism modality. It is focused on achieving maximum profitability.Horizontal management model that takes into consideration the social vindication processes of historically neglected groups, putting community interests before individual ones. It focuses on obtaining profitability that will be redistributed equitably within the group.
Source: elaborated from Maldonado-Erazo et al. [10] and Valdez and Ochoa [21].
Table 2. Community ventures recognized by the FEPTCE in the year 2022.
Table 2. Community ventures recognized by the FEPTCE in the year 2022.
Regional
Network
CantonName of the EnterpriseYear of
Creation
Number of
Communities
ConditionRegistration–CT
Community Tourism Network Sierra Centro “Kawsaymanta”
AlausíNizag Agro-Craft Center 20011ActiveNo
ColtaCenter for Indigenous Development (CEDEIN)199514 of Colta and
Guamote
ActiveNo
ColtaBalda Lupaxi Integral Development Center (CEDIBAL)20041Partially activeNo
GuamoteGuarguallá Craft and Community Tourism Center20082ActiveNo
GuanoCalshi20041ActiveNo
GuanoChuquipogio20051InactiveNo
GuanoRazu Ñan20031ActiveNo
RiobambaCasa Cóndor19971ActiveYes
RiobambaUnion of Indigenous Peasants San Juan (UCASAJ)200211Partially activeNo
RiobambaSumak Kawsay—Royal Palace20061ActiveYes
RiobambaQuilla Pacari19981ActiveYes
Sources: Araque [80], Maldonado-Erazo et al. [10], Secretary of Human Rights [81].
Table 3. Initial analysis of the environmental problems of community tourism organizations (CTO) in the year 2010.
Table 3. Initial analysis of the environmental problems of community tourism organizations (CTO) in the year 2010.
ComponentProblemNizag Agro-Craft CenterCEDEIN CEDIBALGuarguallá Craft and Community Tourism CenterCalshiChuquipogioRazu ÑanCasa CóndorUCASAJSumak Kawsay—Royal PalaceQuilla
Pacari
GroundGround erosion x xxxx
Erosion from overgrazingx
Advance of the agricultural frontierx xxx
Garbage contamination of soils x x
Loss of vegetation cover in the páramos x
Pollution of the wastelands xxxx
Family land contamination xxxxxx
Mining exploitation x
Degradation of cultivated land x
WaterRiver pollutionx
Unprotected waterholes x
Unprotected micro-basins xx x
AirPollution generated by the decomposition of garbagex xx
Pollution due to the emission of gases due to the transit of land and heavy transport x x
FloraLoss of native vegetationx x
Eucalyptus monoculturex x x x
Pine monoculture x xx x x
Loss of native vegetation
Native forest felling x xx
Straw burning x
Loss of grasslands x
Reforestation with pines and eucalyptus xx
FaunaDisplacement of wildlife to surrounding areasxxxxxxxx xx
Proliferation of domestic and sick animals x
Decrease in the avifauna x
Sources: Calderón [90], Equator Initiative [79].
Table 4. Community enterprises linked to the process of registering the material cultural heritage (MCH).
Table 4. Community enterprises linked to the process of registering the material cultural heritage (MCH).
CantonName of the EnterpriseRegistration
Movable PropertyImmovables
AlausíNizag Agro-Craft Center82
GuanoCalshi113
GuanoRazu Ñan111
RiobambaCasa Cóndor101
RiobambaUCASAJ132
Table 5. Community undertakings linked to the revitalization process of the intangible cultural heritage (ICH).
Table 5. Community undertakings linked to the revitalization process of the intangible cultural heritage (ICH).
ICH AreasRevitalized Cultural ManifestationsNizag
Agro-Craft Center
CEDEINCEDIBALGuarguallá Craft and Community Tourism CenterCalshiChuqui-PogioRazu ÑanCasa CóndorUCASAJSumak Kawsay—Royal PalaceQuilla Pacari
Traditions and oral expressionsTales and legends associated with natural elements such as mountains, where the loves of these mythical beings are sharedXX X XXXXXX
Tales associated with the local fauna in connection with the territories (owl, wolf, Andean condor, lama)X X X X
Stories associated with cultural practices such as marriage, weaving, the way of tilling the land, the creation of natural sites, the presence of Chimborazo, characters from popular festivals, sacred rituals XX XXX X X
Ritual social uses and festive actsCommunity practices such as minka, makita mañachi, and randi randi” (forms of reciprocity*)XXXXXXXXXXX
Rites of passage (marriages and funerals, among others)XXXXXXXXXXX
Apotropaic rites of energy renewal for the body and soul X
Propitiatory rites of gratitude to the Pachamama X XX
Knowledge and uses related to natureSymbolic spaces related to rituals, legends, or myths, among which are Chiripunga; Cerro Sagrado Puruwa considered a guardian apu; and Qhapac ÑanX
Symbolic space related to rituals, legends, or myths such as Machay Temple X
Symbolic space related to rituals, legends, or myths such as the Sacred Stone Yana Rumi X X
Creative manifestationsMusic and songs that narrate daily life or special events in the communityXX X XXXXXX
Traditional gamesXX X XXXXXX
Traditional craft techniquesTraditional craft techniques linked to textiles and natural fiber fabrics, among othersXXXXXXX XXX
Traditional house construction techniques X X
Food and gastronomic heritageRitual and daily gastronomyXXXXX X
Knowledge linked to the symbolic value of the agricultural products of the areaXXXXX X
* minka = collective reciprocity, makita mañachi = individual reciprocity, and randi randi = giving and receiving.
Table 6. Community undertakings analysis of the tourist offer.
Table 6. Community undertakings analysis of the tourist offer.
CantonName of the EnterpriseTouristic Offer *AttractionsComplementary Activities
NaturalCulturalTotal
AlausíNizag Agro-Craft CenterFG7411Hike to Chiripungo, viewpoint of the condor, and Qhapac Ñan
horseback riding
Demonstration of cultural activities
Dance and museum at Sibambe station
ColtaCEDEINFG314Community coexistence
Walks
Demonstration of craft activities
Visit to Yana Rumy in the canton of Riobamba, a community-owned space
ColtaCEDIBALFG9312Walks
Visits to fairs
Visit to the quinoa and family farms
GuamoteGuarguallá Craft and Community Tourism CenterFAG21 21Purchase of handicrafts
Walks
Horseback riding
Visit to the waterfall
Excursion to the Sangay volcano
GuanoCalshiFAG 6410Cultural practices of skiing and weaving
Participation in traditional festivals
Ascent to Chimborazo
Visit to the Bolívar stone
Sale of handicrafts
Walks
High mountain climbing
Preparation for mountaineering
Elaboration of crafts
Landscape photography
Excursion to the ice mines
Walks to the Cóndor Samana waterfall
Chuquipogio
Razu Ñan
RiobambaCasa CóndorFAG 9211Walks
Bike ride
Bird watching
Cultural activities
High mountain climbing
Shearing activities and treatment of alpaca fiber
Community coexistence
Organic garden tour
Hike to Mount Shobol Urku
Visit to the pogyo Tayta Andrés
UCASAJ
Sumak Kawsay—Royal PalaceFAG189Walks
Visit to the llama museum
Crafts in sheep wool, alpaca, and llama fiber
Llama meat-based diet
Way of Simon Bolivar
Visit to spinning mill
Cultural coexistence
Quilla Pacari
* FAG = food, accommodation, and guidance; FG = food and guidance. Source: own elaboration based on Araque [80], Castillo-Vizuete et al. [96], CORDTUCH [77], and Llanga [97].
Table 7. CTO tourism products.
Table 7. CTO tourism products.
Product NameDurationPoints of InterestContentsCTO
Trekking llamaFull dayMuseum of the Llama
Craft center
Gastronomy
Ascent to Chimborazo
Interpretive trails
Guidance
Accommodation
Feeding
High mountain climbing
Preparation for mountaineering
Walks
Sumak Kawsay—Royal Palace
Sharing life in community in the foothills of Chimborazo2 days and one nightVisit to agricultural and livestock activities
Artisanal process for obtaining sheep’s wool
Ice mines
Snowy Chimborazo
Cultural coexistence activities
Transport
Guidance
Accommodation
Feeding
Culture night
Hike
Ice mines
Ascent to Chimborazo
Viewpoints
Razu Ñan
Surrounding the Tayta Chimborazo4 days and 3 nightsMuseum of the Llama
Craft process of sheep wool
Snowy Chimborazo
Polylepis Forest
Agroecological activities
Visit to organic gardens
Agro-ancestral practices
Transport
Guidance
Accommodation
Feeding
Culture night
Walks
Sumak Kawsay
Razu Ñan
Casa Cóndor
UCASAJ
Quilla Pacari
Balda Lupaxi (CEDIBAL)
Nizag: “Culture and Ancestral Knowledge”2 days and 1 nightChiripungo Mountain
Cóndor Viewpoint
Qhapaq Ñan
Seville
Sibambe
Visit to organic gardens
Craft workshop
Nizag Community
Transport
Guidance
Accommodation
Feeding
Culture night
Walks
Nizag
Chimborazo’s last snowfieldFull dayIce mines
Snowy Chimborazo
Guidance
Accommodation
Feeding
Walks
Razu Ñan
Source: elaborated from Travel Agencies Finder [98] and Community tourism operator “Puruhá Razurku” [99].
Table 8. Trained local guides.
Table 8. Trained local guides.
OrganizationsNo. of ProcedureOrganizationsWith License
AGUITUCH6AGUITUCH8
UCASAJ2UCASAJ4
Casa Cóndor2Casa Cóndor3
Calshi2Calshi2
CEDIBAL 1CEDIBAL1
Shobol pamba1Razu Ñan2
Cacha1Nizag2
San Rafael de Chuquipogio1
Overall total15Santa Lucía de Chuquipogio1
Overall total24
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maldonado-Erazo, C.P.; del Río-Rama, M.d.l.C.; Miranda-Salazar, S.P.; Tierra-Tierra, N.P. Strengthening of Community Tourism Enterprises as a Means of Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Case Study of Community Tourism Development in Chimborazo. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074314

AMA Style

Maldonado-Erazo CP, del Río-Rama MdlC, Miranda-Salazar SP, Tierra-Tierra NP. Strengthening of Community Tourism Enterprises as a Means of Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Case Study of Community Tourism Development in Chimborazo. Sustainability. 2022; 14(7):4314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074314

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maldonado-Erazo, Claudia Patricia, María de la Cruz del Río-Rama, Sandra Patricia Miranda-Salazar, and Nancy P. Tierra-Tierra. 2022. "Strengthening of Community Tourism Enterprises as a Means of Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Case Study of Community Tourism Development in Chimborazo" Sustainability 14, no. 7: 4314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074314

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop