Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Photovoltaic Waste-Recycling Process in Polish Conditions—A Short Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization and Planning of Household Waste Management: A Case Study from the MENA Region
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Literature Review on Environmental Sustainability Issues of Flexible Packaging: Potential Pathways for Academic Research and Managerial Practice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Waste to Hydrogen: Elaboration of Hydroreactive Materials from Magnesium-Aluminum Scrap
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Bio Fertilizer Produced from Organic Solid Waste Using Composting Bins

by
Aseel Najeeb Ajaweed
1,2,*,
Fikrat M. Hassan
2 and
Nadhem H. Hyder
3
1
Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10071, Iraq
2
Department of Biology, College of Science for Women, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10071, Iraq
3
Department of Biotechnology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10071, Iraq
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4738; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084738
Submission received: 13 March 2022 / Revised: 11 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022

Abstract

:
Background: The possibility of converting the organic fraction of municipal solid waste to mature compost using the composting bin method was studied. Nine distinct treatments were created by combining municipal solid waste (MSW) with animal waste (3:1, 2:1), poultry manure (3:1, 2:1), mixed waste (2:1:1), agricultural waste (dry leaves), biocont (Trichoderm hazarium), and humic acid. Weekly monitoring of temperature, pH, EC, organic matter (OM percent), and the C/N ratio was performed, and macronutrients (N, P, K) were measured. Trace elements, including heavy metals (Cd and Pb), were tested in the first and final weeks of maturity. Results: Temperatures in the first days of composting reached the thermophilic phase in MSW compost with animal and poultry manure between 55–60 °C, pH and EC (mS/cm) increased during the composting period in most composting bin treatments. Overall, organic matter (OM percent) and the C/N ratio decreased (10.27 to 18.9) as result of microbial activity during composting. Organic matter loss percent was less in treatments containing additives (biocont l humic acid) as well agricultural waste treatment. Composting bin treatments with animals and poultry showed higher K and P at the mature stage with an increase in micronutrients. Finally heavy metals were (2.25–4.20) mg/kg and (139–202) mg/kg for Cd and Pb respectively at maturation stage. Conclusion: Therefore, the results suggested that MSW could be composted in the compost bin method with animal and poultry manure. The physio-chemical parameters pH, Ec and C/N were within the acceptable standards. Heavy metals and micronutrients were under the limits of the USA standards. The significance of this study is that the compost bin may be used as a quick check to guarantee that the outputs of long-term public projects fulfill general sustainability requirements, increase ecosystem services, and mitigate the effect of municipal waste disposal on climate change particularly the hot climate regions.

1. Introduction

Globally, urbanization and the continual growth of the human population have resulted in the development of massive amounts of trash. These waste streams have created a slew of environmental, social, and economic concerns, particularly in poor countries [1]. Each day, a substantial volume of municipal solid waste (MSW) is created and disposed of in landfills at a rate of less than 6% recycling and composting [2]. MSW management is without a doubt one of the most serious environmental concerns facing the world, especially in metropolitan areas. If not correctly treated, it may have a negative impact on the environment by creating a disagreeable odor, causing leachate, and emitting greenhouse gases. Landfilling is the primary method of disposing of MSW in the vast majority of nations globally, regardless of per capita wealth [3]. However, this treatment method has been criticized because of its high environmental impacts and incompatibility with the concept of a circular bioeconomy [4]. Composting, as a less expensive and sophisticated method, may be used in place of landfills for organic waste recycling. Due to their high organic matter and mineral contents, municipal solid wastes may be utilized to improve soil fertility. Composting is an effective technique for generating a stabilized material that may be utilized in fields as a source of nutrients and soil conditioners [5]. Composting is an aerobic and exothermic process that is used globally to treat biodegradable trash and convert it into a soil conditioner and fertilizer. Additionally, it is the most ecologically beneficial technique of garbage disposal when compared to other processes, such as incineration, landfilling, and anaerobic digestion [6]. Composting has been shown to be an effective method of increasing crop productivity and soil quality. Composts include plant nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, as well as organic substrates. As a result, it has the potential to influence a soil’s physical, chemical, and biological quality [7]. Natural composting is a lengthy process, but land scarcity and vast amounts of MSW demand that these wastes be handled more rapidly. The amount and composition of organic matter in compost are critical in determining the product’s quality [8,9]. Chemical parameters of composts, such as electrical conductivity (EC), pH, nutrient levels, organic matter, C:N ratio, and heavy metal concentration, have been utilized to determine their maturity and stability [10,11]. Three stages of composting were observed: the mesophilic stage increased temperature from ambient to 40 °C; the thermophilic stage characterized temperatures between 50 °C and 60 °C due to microbial activity during composting with the aid of passive or active aeration (turning composting bin) and moisture content between 40% and 60%). When the temperature reaches 60 °C, the breakdown process becomes sluggish, and microbial activity is restricted to thermotolerant bacteria. After 2–3 weeks, the temperature of the compost began to decrease and did not return to normal after turning. This is the cooling stage, during which the compost reaches stability after a period of time when it is resistant to decomposition. The factory for organic solid waste recycling in Al-Youssoufia City collects MSW collected from neighboring communities in southern Baghdad. The MSW comprised reusable organic materials as well as plastics and glass. The majority of this trash is disposed of in landfills. The present research aimed to convert the organic portion of MSW to biofertilizer using aerobic bin composting and to characterize the physicochemical properties of the compost. Urbanization and industrialization have created a slew of issues for garbage management. Pollution of the environment and garbage creation have a direct effect on biological diversity. Without proper treatment, haphazard discharge of solid waste into the environment may have negative consequences, resulting in contamination of all resources. Enhancing the pace and degree of degradation may provide considerable benefits in terms of optimizing the composting duration, quality, and production of the compost. This is accomplished by the addition of different chemicals to the composting process.
The purpose of this research is to determine the physicochemical properties of municipal solid trash in the presence of different additives, most of which are industrial waste products. The following goals were established for the research Composting of Solid Waste in Baghdad City Using Various Additives:
  • To discover and choose additives for organic waste stabilization.
  • To determine the viability of combining organic wastes for stabilization
  • To determine the physio-chemical parameters necessary for organic waste stabilization.
  • Performance evaluation of the method when coupled with various types of stabilized organic waste.
  • To compare the organic matter lose percent during composting duration.
  • To ascertain the presence and characteristics of heavy metals in solid waste.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Feedstock and Composting Materials Used in the Composting Bin Methods

From September to December 2020, the composting was performed in the garden of the College of Science for Women at the University of Baghdad using the aerobic bin composting technique at an ambient, and compost maturity was monitored until March 2021.
Composting materials included MSW (which was previously crushed and sieved in the factory), which was the primary component of the composting process. The MSW was transported from a waste treatment and recycling facility in the district of the al-Yusufiya factory, approximately 20 km south of Baghdad. The dried animal and poultry manure utilized in the various mixtures was supplied by the Abu-Ghraib district’s College of Agriculture Science.
Quality control and assurance has been provided for technical guidance in addition to the quality control and assurance of geosynthetics used to contain waste, as well as manufacturing quality assurance and control of these materials. It covers all types of waste containment facilities, including hazardous waste landfills and impoundments, municipal solid waste according to local and international standardization, and Starting with elaboration of sampling plan in accordance with the relevant guidelines and standards.

2.2. Design and Composting Methods

To construct compost heaps, composting bin scale composting was used, mostly via the use of composting containers [12,13]. Composting bin technique scale tests were performed in plastic containers (0.4 m × 0.4 m × 0.90 m). For aerobic composting, holes with a diameter of 1.5 cm were drilled at equal intervals in each container, approximately six rows on each side, to ensure aerobic composting. Composting bin s were physically turned twice a week for the first two weeks and then weekly until week 14. During the composting process, the moisture content of the compost should remain between 40% and 60%. Following the mixing of compost mixes, a thin layer of old compost was applied to the heaps to maintain warmth and moisture throughout the first stages of the composting process. Temperatures were taken daily for the first four weeks and thereafter weekly. For physio-chemical analysis, samples were gathered weekly after rotating the composting bin and then every two weeks, as previously stated. Samples were obtained from the center and margins of the organic waste composting bin and then combined in plastic bags to guarantee homogeneity of the sample for analysis. Composting took 14 weeks, but maturation and curing extended the process to 26 weeks. Each compost container was sieved using five-millimeter sieves. Weighing and removing nonbiodegradable particles from each compost treatment.

2.3. Experimental Design

Compost materials included the organic fraction of MSW, animal, poultry (chicken) manure and agricultural waste. Composting research employed the organic part of municipal solid waste as a starting material and animal, poultry, and agricultural waste as a bulking agent. The study involved nine main treatments consisting of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste mixed with different percentages of animal, poultry manure and agriculture waste. Biocont (Trichoderm hazarium 19 × 107 spore in 1 g) and potassium humate (K2O 12%) as a source of carbon and nutrients [13] were added as separate treatments. Table 1 presents some of the physiochemical characteristics of the organic solid fraction (OSF) of municipal waste and the mixture of OSF with different bulking agents. The following treatments were used in the current study:
Composting bin 1: 100% organic solid waste (control).
Composting bin 2: organic solid waste: animal manure 3:1 (75:25) (w/w) %.
Composting bin 3: organic solid waste: poultry manure (chicken manure) 3:1 (75:25) (w/w) %.
Composting bin 4: organic solid waste: animal manure (2:1) (67:33) (w/w) %.
Composting bin 5: organic solid waste: poultry manure (2:1) (67:33) (w/w) %.
Composting bin 6: organic solid waste: agriculture waste 9:1 (90:10) (w/w) %
Composting bin 7: organic solid waste: animal manure: poultry manure (2:1:1) (50:25:25) (w/w) %.
Composting bin 8: organic solid waste: Bicont (100:2) (w/w/v) %.
Composting bin 9: organic solid waste: humic acid (100:2) (w/w/v) %.

2.4. Analysis of Physiochemical Characteristics

Temperature was monitored daily by a thermometer using a metal probe to make deep holes to reach the thermometer to a depth of 25–30 cm. All sample analyses were performed in the Biology Department College of Science and Laboratory of Agricultural Science Collage/University of Baghdad. Subsamples (500 g) were collected from each composting bin after mixing the components of the composting bins to obtain a representative sample every two weeks, air dried in an open container, crushed to sieve 2 mm and kept in polyethylene bags until analysis in the laboratory. The samples were kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C for physio-chemical analysis. A range of physiochemical parameters were determined, including the following:
2.4.1 Moisture was measured after turning and watering the composting bin samples, and 10 g of wet composted samples was weighed and dried in an oven at temperature 105 °C for 24 h.
2.4.2 The pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of a water extract were evaluated by diluting one part of the compost by volume with 10 parts distilled water at a ratio of 1:10 (w/v). The samples were shaken and allowed to precipitate before being filtered using the procedure described by [14], where both EC and pH has been calibrated with standard solutions.
2.4.2 The organic matter (OM) % and C% were calculated as the weight loss of the samples. Ten grams of composted sample was weighed and dried in an oven at 105 °C for 24 h and then ignited at 550 °C for 4 h. The difference in weight referred to as volatile substances and OM% was calculated according to the equations described by [15] as follows:
OM % = w 1 w 2 w 1 100
where w1 is the dry weight after 105 °C and w2 is the weight after ignition at 550 °C.
Organic carbon   ( C % ) = OM % 1.8
Organic matter loss   ( OM % ) = 100 100   X 1 [ ( 100 X 2 ) ] X 2 [ ( 100 X 1 ) ]
where X1 is an intail organic mater, and X2 is the final value of organic mater.
2.4.3 Macro-Nutrients (N,P,K) total nitrogen was determined by the modified Kjeldahl’s method. The composted samples were digested in concentrated H2SO4 [16].
Total potassium was measured by the flame method using a flame photometer, and total phosphate was measured by a spectrophotometer at 882 nm by Jackson, 1973; After Prepare a series of Standard Solutions from the Stock Solution.
2.4.4 Mineral elements such as Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe as well as heavy metal concentrations (Cd and Pb) were determined by digestion of compost with concentrated H2SO4 and concentrated HClO4 and atomic absorption spectrophotometry by Lindsay, W.1978.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Composition of Organic Wastes in Composting Bins

Municipal organic waste is one of the possible nutrient-rich organic leftovers that, when recycled, yields a useful and nutrient-dense product called compost.
The organic part of the trash was discovered (pH 6.7) and included a rather small amount of total nitrogen (1 percent). The organic carbon (C%) was 29.2%, with a C:N ratio of 29.272. The chemical features of OFSW (Table 1) indicated that it should be treated with additional nutrients to increase its value as an organic fertilizer. This would increase the microbial activity, stability, and maturity of the waste by composting. Provided a supply of nitrogen to maintain an optimal C/N ratio, as well as organic waste rich in N, P, and K nutrient [16,17,18]. Animal manure, chicken dung, and agricultural waste are all high in nitrogen and have been used to replenish heaps to remedy nitrogen depletion, as well as animal manure and poultry as additives or inoculums for compost treatment, which is beneficial for producing high-quality fertilizer or substrate hater 2015).
Table 1. Physio-chemical characteristics of raw and mixtures of composted materials.
Table 1. Physio-chemical characteristics of raw and mixtures of composted materials.
Raw Materials and Their Mixture
Used in the Composting Bins
pHEC (ms/cm−1)Organic Matter (OM)%C (%)N (%)C:N (%)
Unmixed
Bin 1: OSFW * (100%)6.703.852.6929.2720.9929.5
Mixtures
Bin 2: OFSW+ Animal manure (3:1) (75% + 25% by weight)6.474.10062.18234.551.1829.42
Bin 3: OFSW + Poultry manure (3:1) (75% + 25% by weight)6.734.37563.5635.3101.43524.61
Bin 4: OFSW + Animal manure (2:1) (66% + 33% by weight)6.494.6366.5336.961.1532.248
Bin 5: OFSW + Poultry manure (2:1) (66% + 33% by weight)6.534.6664.2135.671.3127.238
Bin 6: OFSW + Agriculture waste (9:1) (90% + 10% by weight)6.904.0354.19330.111.0528.713
Bin 7: OFSW + animal + poultry manure (2:1:1) (50:25:25) (w/w) %6.854.4768.6538.141.722.433
Bin 8: OFSW + Bicont (100: 2) (w/w/v) %6.84.47549.4827.491.0825.457
Bin 9: OFSW + Humic fulvic acid (100: 2) (w/w/v) %6.813.6752.3629.091.420.786
Standard values suitable for composting Source: Standard [19,20,21]5.5–8.0->2030–40>0.625–50:1
* Organic fraction of solid waste.
The present study’s findings indicated that proportioning mixed wastes in the mixes in Table 1 resulted in a good C/N ratio in heaps 1–9, which varied between 20.786 and 32.248, as many studies have largely agreed.

3.2. Physical and Chemical Characteristics

3.2.1. The Effect of Temperature

The temperature pattern indicates the presence of microbes and the beginning of the composting process. Daily temperature readings for each bin were taken, and the weekly average was calculated. Refer to Figure 1. Temperatures increased in the majority of compost heaps to values between 55–60 °C in combination wastes with varying percentages of animal and poultry manure during the early stages of the composting process. Gradual temperature increases to the thermophilic stage (40–60 °C) over the three-week composting process, indicating microbial breakdown of organic solid waste. The temperature decreases after the sixth week and then stabilizes indicating that the organic part of garbage has decomposed into compost [22,23]. Due to extended maturation period temperature increased at last weeks of maturation lined with increased ambient temperature (27–29 °C) in March. Throughout the composting process, the moisture level was maintained between 40% and 60%.

3.2.2. Effect of pH

At the start of the composting process, the pH of MSW and its combinations with varying degrees of acidification was between 6.5 and 6.8. Reduced pH at the start of composting indicates the development of organic acids, which subsequently became more basic in all compost bins and reached more than 7 in all waste after two weeks (Figure 2). Gradual increases in pH throughout the composting process restrict fungal development that thrives in an acidic environment, while aeration holes and regular composting bin turning minimize CO2 trapped in the empty space between compost particles [24]. At the curing stage, the pH value of compost bins is approximately 8 as a consequence of decreased microbial activity and organic acid generation agreed with study [25,26,27].

3.3. Electrical Conductivity (EC)

The EC value is critical to monitor during the composting process because it indicates the saltiness of the composted materials and their appropriateness for plant development. The present study discovered a considerable change in EC values throughout the composting process as a result of nutrient release. In comparison to the control and other compost combinations, the greatest EC values reported with compost mixtures of animal and poultry manure in the sixth week varied between 4.5–5.05 mS/cm (Figure 3). At the conclusion of the composting process (Figure 3), the EC value for MSW and combined organic wastes was substantially higher than the EC value for MSW alone.
Poultry chickens have a higher concentration of soluble salts because of the animal food they consume, but compost created from a combination of organic matter other than manure and plant material has a lower concentration of soluble salts [28]. EC values rise during organic matter degradation when inorganic compounds are formed, and the relative concentration of ions increases owing to waste mass loss [5]. The EC values for all compost combinations decreased as they matured as lined with study [29], while others showed an increase. There was a slight rise in EC values due to co-composting with organic additives [6,11,12,30]. As previously stated, the optimal EC value for developing plants is <4 dS m−1.

3.4. Carbon:Nitrogen Ratio and Organic Matter

The C/N ratio is a critical component of the composting process. A high C/N ratio shows the existence of unutilized complex nitrogen, while a decreasing C:N ratio indicates the completion of the process (compost maturity). By and large, all waste mixtures exhibit a drop in organic carbon throughout the composting process as a result of organic matter breakdown. Figure 4. The C/N ratio for each composting bin ranged from (20.79 to 32.25) that percent which is closely to preferred C/N ratio stated in Doughtry 1998 the early stage of composting, decreased progressively as the substrate decomposed, and reached (10.27 to 18.9) percent during the mature stage, when it marginally decreased. Certain compost bins exhibit a slight rise in the C/N ratio, which might be due to ammonia volatilization under alkaline conditions with a low C/N ratio, as shown in compost bins 6 and 9 or bacteria extract nitrate or another nitrogenous molecule from compost, as well as compostingbin.2 resulted an increase in C /N in third week lined with [21] study when C/N increased during composting MSW alone at third week of composting process [30,31].
The drop in the C/N ratio might be the consequence of organic carbon being converted to carbon dioxide, followed by a decrease in the amount of organic acid. The reduction rate of C/N lowered between 6th–8th week agree with [32] study on food waste composting that TOC were more stable in 6th week. When the C/N ratio was less than 20, the compost was considered mature and may be utilized without limitation. Compost used in agriculture must have a C/N ratio between 12 and 18 [33,34].
The overall average organic matter (OM percent) content of the compost bin treatments varied between 41.93 and 53.3 during the composting period (Table 2). The organic matter loss was greater in compost bins 5 and 7 especially during thermophilic phase, where the average OM percent was considerably different from the MSW treatment. The addition of animal or poultry manure accelerated organic matter degradation in comparable rates between compost bin 2 and 3 but higher reduction when wastes mixed together in compostingbin 7 this due to higher organic matter content. The reduction rate was lower in wastes containing Compost bin 8 with Biocon. additives did not promote microbial activity in the same way that the Trichoderma hazarium spore suspension did in study [35]. The addition of potassium humate to MSW throughout the composting process had no effect on microbiological activity and increased degradation rate. Concerning compost quality, mature compost meets the standards for Eu guidelines (>15), and the CCQC recommends a minimum organic matter concentration of 25%.

3.5. Effect of Nutrients (N, P and K) on the Composting Process

Generally, MSW mixed with animal manure and chicken poultry has an acceptable nitrogen percent for agricultural purposes. The variation between the initial and final values for compost due to microbial activity leads to an increase in the degradation of organic matter and loss of carbon in the form of CO2 and the contribution of nitrogen-fixing bacteria, which are responsible for the increase in total nitrogen content at the mature stage [34]. After maturity, the present study found the highest nitrogen level in compost bins 4 and 7 (2.08% and 2.05%, respectively) and the lowest nitrogen content in composting bin 6 (1.120%), which is consistent with previous research on composted solid waste (Al-Turki, El-Hadidy, and Al-Romian 2013). Nitrogen loss was also detected at the mature stage as ammonia volatilization or immobilization processes, which were encouraged by high pH values (between 7.7 and 8.2), as evident in composting bins 5 and 9 [36,37].
Additionally, phosphorus and potassium are key minerals for plant growth. Generally, total phosphorous is represented as a percentage (%) of dry weight. The amount of P % in the initial stage of decomposition varied between 0.320 and 0.649% in all compostingbins (Table 3) and increased in the majority of composting bins during the final stage of the composting process as the compost cured. In composting bin 7 (organic solid waste:animal manure:poultry manure) (2:1:1), a slight increase in P percent was observed, ranging from 0.320 to 0.860%. Phosphorous loss (decrease) during composting may be attributed to phosphoric compound consumption in cell development or leachate. However, compost made from organic waste and poultry manure combined at a 2:1 ratio in compostingbin5 has a greater P percent content during the mature stage of decomposition. The current study’s findings corroborated those of [38].
The total potassium concentration ranged between 0.155 and 1.19% in all composting bin s at the start of the composting process and concentrated toward the conclusion of the procedure, particularly for waste mixed with poultry manure. Additionally, the findings indicated that the compost generated from organic mixed materials in compostingbin7 (MSW:Animal: Poultry) (2:1:1) had a greater K level than the other treatments, owing to the waste including poultry manure, which is a source of K. In most composting composting bin s, the initial K percent was acceptable; this agrees with recent research that found animal manure had a lower K percent value than herbal plants and sugar cane [9,25].

3.6. The Effect of Heavy Metals on Composting Characteristics

The potential availability of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn increased with the age of compost due to the loss of organic matter from decomposition, and Fe was less toxic than other heavy metals because of the alkaline pH of compost [39]. The final values obtained for Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe were lower than the USA limits [40].
Based on the obtained results for the heavy metal content of composts (Figure 5), it can be concluded that the chemical analysis of heavy metals showed that Cd was higher in MSW and its mixtures in the beginning; after the composting process, the Cd decreased significantly, while it was lower in compost bins 1, 2 and 3 mixed with animal or poultry manure. However, the concentration of Cd largely decreased to lower levels after maturation, while the concentration of heavy metal pb was increased in all composting bins after maturation [41].

4. Conclusions

The current study was conducted to determine the effect of organic additives on the composting process of municipal solid waste collected from Baghdad’s municipal solid waste processing unit. Numerous physicochemical elements influence the degradation process during composting, and the pH, EC, organic matter, total nitrogen, and C/N ratios of compost were all within the standards. Animal and poultry manure is an excellent source of bacteria and a bulking agent during the composting process. The macronutrient (N, P, and K) composition of manufactured compost is considered average when compared to compost made from animal and poultry manure and is not regarded as a cause of nutrient pollution in the environment. While the concentrations of Cu, Zn, Mn, and K increased during composting, the heavy metals and micronutrients remained below the permissible limits set by the USEPA for compost. Centralized waste management techniques become inadequate in an era of population boom. Demonstrating accessible alternatives and demonstrating the advantages of trash processing at the household level can motivate many individuals to take responsibility for their own rubbish.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.N.A.; methodology, A.N.A.; software, A.N.A.; validation, A.N.A., F.M.H. and N.H.H.; formal analysis, A.N.A., F.M.H. and N.H.H.; investigation, A.N.A., F.M.H. and N.H.H.; resources, A.N.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N.A.; writing—review and editing, A.N.A., F.M.H. and N.H.H.; supervision, F.M.H. and N.H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Awasthi, M.K.; Pandey, A.K.; Khan, J.; Bundela, P.S.; Wong, J.W.; Selvam, A. Evaluation of thermophilic fungal consortium for organic municipal solid waste composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 168, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aghbashlo, M.; Tabatabaei, M.; Soltanian, S.; Ghanavati, H. Biopower and biofertilizer production from organic municipal solid waste: An exergoenvironmental analysis. Renew. Energy 2019, 143, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Salom, K.; Noor, T. Evaluation of waste sorting and recycling laboratory in Mahmudiya (case study). J. Econ. Adm. Sci. 2019, 25, 385–414. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chew, K.W.; Chia, S.R.; Yen, H.-W.; Nomanbhay, S.; Ho, Y.-C.; Show, P.L. Transformation of Biomass Waste into Sustainable Organic Fertilizers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zaman, A.U. A comprehensive study of the environmental and economic benefits of resource recovery from global waste management systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 124, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Foereid, B. Nutrients Recovered from Organic Residues as Fertilizers: Challenges to Management and Research Methods. World J. Agric. Soil Sci. 2019, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bazrafshan, E.; Zarei, A.; Mostafapour, F.K.; Poormollae, N.; Mahmoodi, S.; Zazouli, M.A. Maturity and Stability Evaluation of Composted Municipal Solid Wastes. Health Scope 2016, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Khan, M.; Sharif, M. Solubility Enhancement of Phosphorus from Rock Phosphate Through Composting with Poultry Litter. Sarhad J. Agric. 2012, 28, 415–420. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao, S.; Liu, X.; Duo, L. Physical and Chemical Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste Compost in Different Particle Size Fractions. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2012, 21, 509–515. [Google Scholar]
  10. Khater, E.G. Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Compost El-Sayed. Int. J. Waste Resour. 2015, 5, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bernal, M.; Alburquerque, J.; Moral, R. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5444–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bustamante, M.; Paredes, C.; Marhuenda-Egea, F.C.; Espinosa, A.P.; Bernal, M.P.; Moral, R. Co-composting of distillery wastes with animal manures: Carbon and nitrogen transformations in the evaluation of compost stability. Chemosphere 2008, 72, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Storino, F.; Menéndez, S.; Muro, J.; Tejo, P.M.A.; Irigoyen, I. Effect of Feeding Regime on Composting in Bins. Compost. Sci. Util. 2017, 25, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Y.; Fang, F.; Wei, J.; Wu, X.; Cui, R.; Li, G.; Zheng, F.; Tan, D. Humic acid fertilizer improved soil properties and soil microbial diversity of continuous cropping peanut: A three-year experiment. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ujj, A.; Percsi, K.; Beres, A.; Aleksza, L.; Diaz, F.; Gyuricza, C.; Fogarassy, C. Analysis of quality of backyard compost and its potential utilization as a circular bio-waste source. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sharma, D.; Varma, V.S.; Yadav, K.D.; Kalamdhad, A.S. Evolution of chemical and biological characterization during agitated composting bin composting of flower waste. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2017, 6, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mamo, M.; Kassa, H.; Ingale, L.; Dondeyne, S. Evaluation of compost quality from municipal solid waste integrated with organic additive in Mizan–Aman town, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Chem. 2021, 15, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bremner, J.M. Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J. Agric. Sci. 1960, 55, 11–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahmad, R.; Jilani, G.; Arshad, M.; Zahir, Z.A.; Khalid, A. Bio-conversion of organic wastes for their recycling in agriculture: An overview of perspectives and prospects. Ann. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zuccconi, F.; de Bertoldi, M. Compost specification for the production and characterization of compost from municipal solid waste. In Compost Production, Quality and the Use; Applied Science Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yousefi, J.; Younesi, H.; Ghasempoury, S.M. Co-composting of Municipal Solid Waste with Sawdust: Improving Compost Quality. Clean-Soil Air Water 2013, 41, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Woh, C.; van Fan, Y.; Suan, L.; Idayu, I. A Review on Application of Microorganisms for Organic Waste Management. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2018, 63, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kosseva, M.R.; Kent, C.A. Thermophilic Aerobic Bioprocessing Technologies for Food Industry Wastes and Wastewater, 1st ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, H.T.; Cai, L. Effect of Sewage Sludge Addition on the Completion of Aerobic Composting of Thermally Hydrolyzed Kitchen Biogas Residue. BioResources 2014, 9, 4862–4872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hemidat, S.; Jaar, M.; Nassour, A.; Nelles, M. Monitoring of Composting Process Parameters: A Case Study in Jordan. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 9, 2257–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Olani, D.D.; Sulaiman, H.; Leta, S. Evaluation of Composting and the Quality of Compost from the Source Separated Municipal Solid Waste. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2012, 16, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jara-Samaniego, J.; Murcia, M.D.P.; Bustamante, M.A.; Paredes, C.; Espinosa, A.P.; Gavilanes, I.; López, M.; Marhuenda-Egea, F.C.; Brito, H.; Moral, R. Development of organic fertilizers from food market waste and urban gardening by composting in Ecuador. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Al-Turki, A.; El-Hadidy, Y.; Al-Romian, F. Assessment of chemical properties of locally composts produced in saudi arabia composts locally produced. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2013, 5, 3571–3578. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tibu, C.; Annang, T.Y.; Solomon, N.; Yirenya-Tawiah, D. Effect of the composting process on physicochemical properties and concentration of heavy metals in market waste with additive materials in the Ga West Municipality, Ghana. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2019, 8, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Tognetti, C.; Mazzarino, M.J.; Laos, F. Improving the quality of municipal organic waste compost. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Doughtry, M. Composting for Municipalities: Planning and Design Considerations; Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service (NRAES): College Park, MD, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chaher, N.E.H.; Chakchouk, M.; Nassour, A.; Nelles, M.; Hamdi, M. Potential of windrow food and green waste composting in Tunisia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 46540–46552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Acatrinei-Însurățelu, O.; Buftia, G.; Lazăr, I.M.; Rusu, L. Aerobic composting of mixing sewage sludge with green waste from lawn grass. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2019, 18, 1789–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Azim, K.; Soudi, B.; Boukhari, S.; Perissol, C.; Roussos, S.; Alami, I.T. Composting parameters and compost quality: A literature review. Org. Agric. 2017, 8, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bari, M.A.; Begum, M.F.; Sarker, K.K.; Rahman, M.A.; Kabir, A.H.; Alam, M.F. Mode of action of Trichoderma spp. on organic solid waste for bioconversion. Plant Environ. Dev. 2007, 1, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  36. Altieri, R.; Esposito, A. Evaluation of the fertilizing effect of olive mill waste compost in short-term crops. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2010, 64, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gómez-Brandón, M.; Lazcano, C.; Domínguez, J. The evaluation of stability and maturity during the composting of cattle manure. Chemosphere 2008, 70, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hussian, A.S.; Hyder, N.H.; Braesam, T.H.; Natheer, A.M. Recycling of Organic Solid Wastes of Cities to Biofertilizer Using Natural Raw Materials. J. Al-Nahrain Univ. Sci. 2016, 19, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hooda, P.S. Trace Elements in Soils; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brinton, W.F. Compost Quality Standards & Guidelines; New York State Association of Recyclers: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  41. Al-Saedi, Z.Z.; Ibrahim, J.A.K. Evaluation of Heavy Metals Content in Simulated Solid Waste Food Compost. J. Eng. 2019, 25, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Temperature changes during the decomposition of organic waste in different composting bins.
Figure 1. Temperature changes during the decomposition of organic waste in different composting bins.
Sustainability 14 04738 g001
Figure 2. pH changes during the composting period in composting bins (1–9).
Figure 2. pH changes during the composting period in composting bins (1–9).
Sustainability 14 04738 g002
Figure 3. Effect of EC values on the decomposition of organic waste in different composting composting bin s.
Figure 3. Effect of EC values on the decomposition of organic waste in different composting composting bin s.
Sustainability 14 04738 g003
Figure 4. Changes in the C/N ratio during the decomposition of organic waste in different composting bins.
Figure 4. Changes in the C/N ratio during the decomposition of organic waste in different composting bins.
Sustainability 14 04738 g004
Figure 5. Heavy metal concentrations (mg/kg) at the beginning and end of maturation compost.
Figure 5. Heavy metal concentrations (mg/kg) at the beginning and end of maturation compost.
Sustainability 14 04738 g005
Table 2. Organic matter (OM%) initial, mature, mean and organic matter losses in different treatments.
Table 2. Organic matter (OM%) initial, mature, mean and organic matter losses in different treatments.
Composting BinOM%
Initial
OM%
Mature
OM%
Mean
OM
Loss
152.6935.0841.9325.85
262.1832.9346.5041.61
363.5632.6744.9240.10
466.5338.4449.7838.82
564.2131.1545.9043.74
654.1938.2346.8826.81
768.6542.1553.3246.68
849.4839.1243.7918.32
952.3640.1146.4116.095
Week means59.3236.65LSD composting-bin * week 2.352
* Relation of avg. composting bin with weeks.
Table 3. Initial and final N, P and K contents in the composting process.
Table 3. Initial and final N, P and K contents in the composting process.
Composting BinsTime (Week)N%P%K%
10
26
0.990
1.50
0.410
1.1
0.565
1.300
20
26
1.17
1.520
0.325
0.695
0.550
1.510
30
2
1.435
1.31
0.320
0.850
0.565
1.550
40
26
1.150
2.08
0.575
1.390
0.155
1.370
50
26
1.310
1.170
0.649
0.621
0.610
1.220
60
26
0.355
1.120
0.355
1.200
0.674
0.775
70
26
1.700
2.050
0.642
0.860
1.190
1.570
80
26
1.080
1.330
0.335
0.520
0.545
0.705
90
26
1.400
1.230
0.624
0.335
0.800
0.900
LSD composting bin0.0240.0250.018
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ajaweed, A.N.; Hassan, F.M.; Hyder, N.H. Evaluation of Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Bio Fertilizer Produced from Organic Solid Waste Using Composting Bins. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084738

AMA Style

Ajaweed AN, Hassan FM, Hyder NH. Evaluation of Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Bio Fertilizer Produced from Organic Solid Waste Using Composting Bins. Sustainability. 2022; 14(8):4738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ajaweed, Aseel Najeeb, Fikrat M. Hassan, and Nadhem H. Hyder. 2022. "Evaluation of Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Bio Fertilizer Produced from Organic Solid Waste Using Composting Bins" Sustainability 14, no. 8: 4738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084738

APA Style

Ajaweed, A. N., Hassan, F. M., & Hyder, N. H. (2022). Evaluation of Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Bio Fertilizer Produced from Organic Solid Waste Using Composting Bins. Sustainability, 14(8), 4738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084738

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop