Green Purchasing: Past, Present and Future
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- QR1. What are the theories used in previous studies of green purchasing?
- QR2. What are the determinants of green purchasing, and has it expanded from previous periods compared with recent periods?
- RQ3. What are the consequences of green purchasing?
- RQ4. How can future research develop green purchasing research?
2. Methodology
- -
- Articles published before 2019 with at least two citations per year;
- -
- Articles published between 2019 and 2021 in the 14 most productive journals.
3. Results of SLR
3.1. Literature Distributions Country
3.2. Theories Applied in Prior Studies
3.2.1. Theory of Planned Behavior
3.2.2. Theory of Reasoned Action
3.2.3. Value-Belief-Normative Theory
3.2.4. Attitude–Behavior–Context Theory
3.2.5. Theory of Consumption Value
3.2.6. Norm Activation Theory
3.2.7. Signaling Theory
3.2.8. Theory of Altruism
3.2.9. Social Theory
3.2.10. Other Theories
3.3. Methodology and Modelling
3.4. Thematical Analysis
3.4.1. Determinants of Green Purchase
Cognitive, Psychological, and Sociodemographic
Product Attributes
Authors | Methodology | Factors | Results |
---|---|---|---|
[87] | Descriptive 236 participants | Price | The results show that the presence of different offers for product prices positively affects the intention and perceptions of consumers to buy green products, as promotional offers that result in gains affect consumers who are interested in green products, while consumers who do not enjoy a high degree of green are attracted to promotional offers that result in a decrease in losses. |
[90] | Taiwan 425 respondents SEM | Brand positioning, brand knowledge | The results show that there are positive effects of brand knowledge and brand positioning on the attitudes and intentions of green buying by consumers. |
[91] | Italy 51 interviews Descriptive | Price, scarcity of products | The results show that the scarcity of products and high price is among the most important determinants that hinder consumers from buying green products. |
[88] | Portugal 215 respondents ML | Packaging | The results show the presence of two groups of consumers, where the first group is interested in packaging; in contrast, the second group considers packaging nonessential when making a purchase decision. |
[92] | China 306 ML | Product knowledge | The results show that product knowledge has a significant impact in supporting consumers’ intentions to purchase green. |
[93] | China 2513 respondents Bayesian logit regression | Retailer type, eco-label credibility | The results show the effect of eco-label credibility and retailer type on green purchasing intentions; moreover, education and awareness of green products contribute positively to the acceptance of green products. |
[48] | India 308 respondents SEM | Media | The results show that the media plays a vital role in inward environmental attitude and attitude towards green packaging, which contributes to encouraging consumers’ intentions to buy green. |
[94] | Turkey 500 consumers SEM | Green brand equity, greenwashing, green brand | The results show that brand credibility and green brand positively affect green purchasing intention; green brand equity also has a significant and robust effect on green purchasing intention. The results also show a negative impact of greenwashing on brand credibility and green brand associations, which indirectly influences purchasing intention. |
[95] | China 236 | Product knowledge | The results show that there are factors that mediate the positive effect of product knowledge in enhancing intentions to buy green products, such as trust in green products, effective consumer perception, and consumer perception of the product price. |
[31] | China 1012 questionnaires SEM | Green advertising skepticism | The results show that green advertising skepticism negatively affects consumers’ intention to buy green. On the other hand, the results show that customized and honest advertising for the consumer is one of the critical factors on which the consumer’s decision is based regarding green purchasing. |
[96] | China 479 questionnaire SEM | Media persuasion | The results indicate that the role of media persuasion on consumers enhances the intention of green purchase and is positively associated, especially with adults, which can be known as the seriousness of problems related to the environment through media persuasion. |
[97] | China 552 questioners SEM | Live-stream marketing | The results of the study indicate that live-stream marketing can stimulate consumers’ intentions towards green buying |
Consequence Design of Products
Social and Environmental Factors
Other Themes
3.4.2. Effects of Green Purchasing
4. Discussion and Future Research Suggestions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Major Factor | Sub-Factors |
---|---|
Sociodemographic factors | Age, gender, education, income, residential area, religion, race, and lifestyle |
Family factors | Number of children, parental influence, and whether there is an elder family member |
Consumption Values | Cultural, epistemic, emotional, biospheric, functional, social, religious (e.g., Islamic), conditional, altruism, and green values |
Product-related factors | Convenience, promotion, price, retailer type affect, reliability, ecolabelling (credibility & involvement), materialism, user-friendliness, greenwashing, brand credibility, product availability, packaging, product self-concept, content marketing, overall image, local products, online product review, and cost consciousness |
Attitudes | Attitude towards the green purchase, implicit attitude (cognitive and effective implicit), environmental attitude, and ambivalent attitudes |
Perception | Perceived value, perceived quality, perceived environmental responsibility, perceived social responsibility, perceived seriousness of environmental problems, perceived deterioration of environmental problem, perceived effectiveness, perceived behavioral control, perceived saving, perceived effectiveness of environmental behavior, perceived benefits, perceived usefulness, perception of consumer actions, perceived eco-literacy, perceived individual benefits, perceived customer effectiveness, perceptions of benefits and risk, perceived consumer effectiveness, perceived barriers, and perceived behavioral control |
Green facets | Brand positioning, brand knowledge, habit, brand equity, brand associations, product knowledge, advertising skepticism, supply chain management, greenwashing perceptions, knowledge, attitude, marketing strategies and innovation, brand image, brand love, brand loyalty, purchasing policy, cognitive implicit, self-concept, self-identity, trust, practice, product innovation, technology innovation, image innovation, service innovation, green brand evangelism, green brand loyalty, and knowledge of green products, and green manufacturing capabilities |
Personal norms | Recycling participation, local environmental involvement, pollution avoidance intentions, pro environmental belief, self- identity/image in environmental protection, environmental concern, external locus of control, collectivism, interpersonal influence, environmentally friendly norm, willingness-to-pay, value for money, egoism, biospheric, long-term orientations, leadership, fashion consciousness, and creativity |
Contextual Factors | Parental influence, peer influence, media exposure to environmental messages, environmental investment pressure, exposure to environmental messages through the media, peer pressure, environmental protection, cultural influences, social influence, media influence, media persuasion, temporal orientation, electronic word-of-mouth, individualistic culture, man–nature orientation, environmental visibility, environmental consciousness, environmental collective efficacy, concerns about societal opinions, ecological effect, frugality, individual social responsibility, adventurous spirit, development consciousness, cynicism, social impact, social benefits, and self-competence |
Regulatory | Government regulations and government initiative |
Cognitive factor | Environmental literacy, environmental awareness, concrete environmental knowledge, environmental education, social sustainability awareness, product knowledge, literacy, ecological knowledge, objective knowledge, subjective knowledge, independent self-construal, individual benefits, innovative news, information quality, action-related knowledge |
Motivations and Emotions | Consumers’ anxiety of death, health consciousness, extrinsic religiosity, gratitude, guilt, pride, fair trade, and moods (e.g., anxiety and depression) |
References
- Yang, W.; Zhang, Y. Research on factors of green purchasing practices of Chinese. J. Bus. Manag. Econ. 2012, 3, 222–231. [Google Scholar]
- Mostafa, M.M. Gender differences in Egyptian consumers? green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2007, 31, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo, H.-W.; Liou, J.J.H.; Wang, H.-S.; Tsai, Y.-S. An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 190, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, R.; Bag, S.; Ali, S.S.; Venkatesh, V.G. Green purchasing is key to superior performance: An empirical study. Int. J. Procure. Manag. 2013, 6, 187–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winds, F. Green procurement: Good environmental stories for North Americans. In Retrieved March; Five Winds International: Paoli, PA, USA, 2007; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
- Green, K.; Morton, B.; New, S. Green purchasing and supply policies: Do they improve companies’ environmental performance? Supply Chain Manag. 1998, 3, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yook, K.H.; Choi, J.H.; Suresh, N.C. Linking green purchasing capabilities to environmental and economic performance: The moderating role of firm size. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2018, 24, 326–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Amosh, H.; Khatib, S.F.A. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure of sustainability performance: The case of Jordan. SN Bus. Econ. 2021, 1, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Swidi, A.; Saleh, R.M. How Green our Future Would Be? An Investigation of the Determinants of Green Purchasing Behavior of Young Citizens in a Developing Country; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 23, ISBN 0123456789. [Google Scholar]
- Visser, R.; Dlamini, S. Green purchasing behaviour towards compostable coffee pods. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutum, D.S.; Ghazali, E.M.; Wei-Pin, W. Parallel mediation effect of consumption values and the moderation effect of innovativeness, in predicting the influence of identity on green purchasing behavior. J. Consum. Behav. 2021, 20, 827–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, Y.N.; Wahid, N.A. A review on green purchase behaviour trend of Malaysian consumers. Asian Soc. Sci. 2015, 11, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liobikienė, G.; Bernatonienė, J. Why determinants of green purchase cannot be treated equally? The case of green cosmetics: Literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatib, S.F.A.; Abdullah, D.F.; Elamer, A.A.; Abueid, R. Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 985–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamil, I.A.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Jamal, N.M.; Hatif, M.A.; Khatib, S.F.A. Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A systematic review. J. Financ. Report. Account. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatib, S.F.A.A.; Abdullah, D.F.; Hendrawaty, E.; Elamer, A.A. A bibliometric analysis of cash holdings literature: Current status, development, and agenda for future research. Manag. Rev. Q. 2021, 72, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazaea, S.A.; Zhu, J.; Khatib, S.F.A.; Bazhair, A.H.; Elamer, A.A. Sustainability assurance practices: A systematic review and future research agenda. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 29, 4843–4864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kotb, A.; Elbardan, H.; Halabi, H. Mapping of internal audit research: A post-Enron structured literature review. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2020, 33, 1969–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatib, S.; Abdullah, D.F.; Elamer, A.; Hazaea, S.A. The Development of Corporate Governance Literature in Malaysia: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatib, S.F.A.; Abdullah, D.F.; Elamer, A.; Yahaya, I.S.; Owusu, A. Global trends in board diversity research: A bibliometric view. Meditari Account. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahi, A.M.; Khalid, H.; Abbas, A.F.; Khatib, S.F.A. The Evolving Research of Customer Adoption of Digital Payment: Learning from Content and Statistical Analysis of the Literature. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitchenham, B.; Charters, S. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering; Technical Report EBSE 2007-001; Keele University and Durham University Joint Report United Kingdom; Keele University and Durham University: Keele, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Vitolla, F.; Raimo, N.; Rubino, M. Appreciations, criticisms, determinants, and effects of integrated reporting: A systematic literature review. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumay, J.; Bernardi, C.; Guthrie, J.; Demartini, P. Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Account. Forum 2016, 40, 166–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nerantzidis, M.; Pazarskis, M.; Drogalas, G.; Galanis, S. Internal auditing in the public sector: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. J. Public Budg. Account. Financ. Manag. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dangelico, R.M.; Nonino, F.; Pompei, A. Which are the determinants of green purchase behaviour? A study of Italian consumers. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 2600–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghazali, E.M.; Mutum, D.S.; Ariswibowo, N. Impact of religious values and habit on an extended green purchase behaviour model. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2018, 42, 639–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eurobarometer. Attitudes of European Citizens Towards the Environment; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- White, K.; Hardisty, D.J.; Habib, R. The Elusive Green Consumer; Harvard Business Review: Harvard, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, R.A.; Haytko, D.L.; Hermans, C.M.; Simmers, C.S. Social Influence on Green Consumerism: Country and Gender Comparisons between China and the United States. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2019, 31, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, B.; Sun, Y.; Shen, J.; Xia, L. How does green advertising skepticism on social media affect consumer intention to purchase green products? J. Consum. Behav. 2020, 19, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, T.K.; Kumar, A.; Jakhar, S.; Luthra, S.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Kazancoglu, I.; Nayak, S.S. Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2002, 32, 665–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yarimoglu, E.; Gunay, T. The extended theory of planned behavior in Turkish customers’ intentions to visit green hotels. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2020, 29, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruangkanjanases, A.; You, J.J.; Chien, S.W.; Ma, Y.; Chen, S.C.; Chao, L.C. Elucidating the Effect of Antecedents on Consumers’ Green Purchase Intention: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, R.Y.K.; Lau, L.B.Y. Explaining green purchasing behavior: A cross-cultural study on American and Chinese consumers. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2002, 14, 9–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albayrak, T.; Aksoy, Ş.; Caber, M. The effect of environmental concern and scepticism on green purchase behaviour. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2013, 31, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research Reading; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y.K. A comparative study of green purchase intention between korean and chinese consumers: The moderating role of collectivism. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sreen, N.; Purbey, S.; Sadarangani, P. Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 41, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stern, P.C.; Dietz, T.; Abel, T.; Guagnano, G.A.; Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 1999, 6, 81–97. [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz, S.H. Normative influences on altruism. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1977, 10, 221–279. [Google Scholar]
- Chua, K.B.; Quoquab, F.; Mohammad, J.; Basiruddin, R. The Mediating Role of New Ecological Paradigm between Value Orientations and Pro-Environmental Personal Norm in the Agricultural Context. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2016, 28, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaini, A.; Quoquab, F.; Mohammad, J.; Hussin, N. “I buy green products, do you …?”: The moderating effect of eWOM on green purchase behavior in Malaysian cosmetics industry. Int. J. Pharm. Healthc. Mark. 2020, 14, 89–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quoquab, F.; Jaini, A.; Mohammad, J. Does it matter who exhibits more green purchase behavior of cosmetic products in Asian culture? A multi-group analysis approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Maki, A.; Chen, C.; Dong, B.; Day, J.K. Investigating willingness to save energy and communication about energy use in the American workplace with the attitude-behavior-context model. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2017, 32, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Li, D.; Cao, C.; Huang, S. The influence of greenwashing perception on green purchasing intentions: The mediating role of green word-of-mouth and moderating role of green concern. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 187, 740–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trivedi, R.H.; Patel, J.D.; Acharya, N. Causality analysis of media influence on environmental attitude, intention and behaviors leading to green purchasing. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 196, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, P.-C.; Huang, Y.-H. The influence factors on choice behavior regarding green products based on the theory of consumption values. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 22, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Zhan, W. How to activate moral norm to adopt electric vehicles in China? An empirical study based on extended norm activation theory. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 3546–3556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Lee, W.J.; Yoo, K.-H. Millennial ride-share passengers’ pro-sustainable behaviors: Norm activation perspective. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2020, 25, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.; Wei, J.; Lu, L.; Li, L. Air pollution and green consumption of consumers in China’s urban areas: A norm activation perspective. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. An Int. J. 2020, 26, 1988–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uyar, A.; Karaman, A.S.; Kilic, M. Is corporate social responsibility reporting a tool of signaling or greenwashing? Evidence from the worldwide logistics sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.K.; Wu, W.Y.; Pham, T.T. Examining the moderating effects of green marketing and green psychological benefits on customers’ green attitude, value and purchase intention. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Luo, B.; Wang, S.; Fang, W. What you see is meaningful: Does green advertising change the intentions of consumers to purchase eco-labeled products? Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davari, A.; Iyer, P.; Strutton, D. Investigating Moral Links between Religiosity, Altruism, and Green Consumption. J. Nonprofit Public Sect. Mark. 2017, 29, 385–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uddin, S.M.F.; Khan, M.N. Young Consumer’s Green Purchasing Behavior: Opportunities for Green Marketing. J. Glob. Mark. 2018, 31, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, F.; Ashfaq, M.; Begum, S.; Ali, A. How “Green” thinking and altruism translate into purchasing intentions for electronics products: The intrinsic-extrinsic motivation mechanism. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020, 24, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bautista, R.; Dui, R.; Jeong, L.S.; Paredes, M.P. Does altruism affect purchase intent of green products? A moderated mediation analysis. Asia-Pac. Soc. Sci. Rev. 2020, 20, 159–170. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Su, X. How impacting factors affect Chinese green purchasing behavior based on Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 118199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Amosh, H.; Mansor, N. Disclosure of integrated reporting elements by industrial companies: Evidence from Jordan. J. Manag. Gov. 2021, 25, 121–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amoako, G.K.; Dzogbenuku, R.K.; Abubakari, A. Do green knowledge and attitude influence the youth’s green purchasing? Theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2020, 69, 1609–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groening, C.; Sarkis, J.; Zhu, Q. Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 1848–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, J.D.; Trivedi, R.H.; Yagnik, A. Self-identity and internal environmental locus of control: Comparing their influences on green purchase intentions in high-context versus low-context cultures. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 53, 102003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazaea, S.A.; Zhu, J.; Al-Matari, E.M.; Senan, N.A.M.; Khatib, S.F.A.; Ullah, S. Mapping of internal audit research in China: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1938351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fife-Schaw, C. Questionnaire design. Res. Methods Psychol. 1995, 174–193. Available online: https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/research-methods-in-psychology-3rd-edition (accessed on 25 December 2021).
- Roopa, S.; Rani, M.S. Questionnaire designing for a survey. J. Indian Orthod. Soc. 2012, 46, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galeazzo, A.; Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N.; Delgado-Ceballos, J. Green procurement and financial performance in the tourism industry: The moderating role of tourists’ green purchasing behaviour. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 24, 700–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiser, B.; Eagan, P.D.; Shaner, H. Solutions to health care waste: Life-cycle thinking and ‘green’ purchasing. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fischer, E.; Castilhos, R.B.; Fonseca, M.J. The qualitative interview in markiting and consumer research: Paradigmatic approaches and guidline. Remark Rev. Bras. Mark. 2014, 13, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.N.; Phan, T.T.H.; Cao, T.K.; Nguyen, H.V. Green purchase behavior: Mitigating barriers in developing countries. Strateg. Dir. 2017, 33, 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Amosh, H.A. The Role of Governance Attributes in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices Evidence From Jordan; Igi Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2021; pp. 255–279. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, R.Y.K.; Lau, L.B.Y. Antecedents of green purchases: A survey in China. J. Consum. Mark. 2000, 17, 338–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K. Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behavior. J. Consum. Mark. 2009, 26, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liang, D.; Hou, C.; Jo, M.S.; Sarigöllü, E. Pollution avoidance and green purchase: The role of moral emotions. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 210, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaini, A.; Quoquab, F.; Mohammad, J.; Hussin, N. Antecedents of green purchase behavior of cosmetics products: An empirical investigation among Malaysian consumers. Int. J. Ethics Syst. 2020, 36, 185–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, R.Y.K. Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychol. Mark. 2001, 18, 389–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafa, M.M. Antecedents of Egyptian Consumers’ Green Purchase Intentions: A Hierarchical Multivariate. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2006, 19, 97–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akehurst, G.; Afonso, C.; Gonçalves, H.M. Re-examining green purchase behaviour and the green consumer profile: New evidences. Manag. Decis. 2012, 50, 972–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanchanapibul, M.; Lacka, E.; Wang, X.; Chan, H.K. An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasnah Hassan, S. The role of Islamic values on green purchase intention. J. Islam. Mark. 2014, 5, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, S.K.; Balaji, M.S. Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 131, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahimah, A.; Khalil, S.; Cheng, J.M.S.; Tran, M.D.; Panwar, V. Understanding green purchase behavior through death anxiety and individual social responsibility: Mastery as a moderator. J. Consum. Behav. 2018, 17, 477–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witek, L.; Kuźniar, W. Green purchase behavior: The effectiveness of sociodemographic variables for explaining green purchases in emerging market. Sustainability 2021, 13, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Weisstein, F.L.; Duan, S.; Choi, P. Impact of ambivalent attitudes on green purchase intentions: The role of negative moods. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 46, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ma, B.; Bai, R.; Zhang, L. The unexpected effect of frugality on green purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 59, 102385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weisstein, F.L.; Asgari, M.; Siew, S.W. Price presentation effects on green purchase intentions. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2014, 23, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinho, G.; Pires, A.; Portela, G.; Fonseca, M. Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 103, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chekima, B.; Khalid Wafa, S.A.W.S.; Igau, O.A.; Chekima, S. Determinant factors of consumers’ green purchase intention: The moderating role of environmental advertising. Asian Soc. Sci. 2015, 11, 318–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, Y.C.; Yang, M.; Wang, Y.C. Effects of green brand on green purchase intention. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2014, 32, 250–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbarossa, C.; Pastore, A. Why environmentally conscious consumers do not purchase green products. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 2015, 18, 188–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Deng, T. Research on the green purchase intentions from the perspective of Product knowledge. Sustainability 2016, 8, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cai, Z.; Xie, Y.; Aguilar, F.X. Eco-label credibility and retailer effects on green product purchasing intentions. For. Policy Econ. 2017, 80, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akturan, U. How does greenwashing affect green branding equity and purchase intention? An empirical research. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2018, 36, 809–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ma, B.; Bai, R. How Does Green Product Knowledge Effectively Promote Green Purchase Intention? Sustainability 2019, 11, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, X.; Zhang, L. Diagnose barriers to sustainable development: A study on “desensitization” in urban residents’ green purchasing behavior. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Q.; Zhou, F.; Wu, Y.J. Using virtual gifts on live streaming platforms as a sustainable strategy to stimulate consumers’ green purchase intention. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visser, M.; Schoormans, J.; Vogtländer, J. Consumer buying behaviour of sustainable vacuum cleaners—Consequences for design and marketing. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 195, 664–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, K.T.; Brower, T.R. Longitudinal study of green marketing strategies that influence Millennials. J. Strateg. Mark. 2012, 20, 535–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Dong, F. Why do consumers make green purchase decisions? Insights from a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Lu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Su, C. Going green: How different advertising appeals impact green consumption behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 2663–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.F.; Hoong, K.C.; Hamid, N.A.; Sarpin, N.; Zainal, R.; Ahmad, A.N.A.; Hassan, M.F. The impact of product design and process design on new product performance in manufacturing industry. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 2016, 020016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, Y.; Rahman, Z. Predictors of young consumer’s green purchase behaviour. Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J. 2016, 27, 452–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dagher, G.K.; Itani, O. Factors influencing green purchasing behaviour: Empirical evidence from the Lebanese consumers. J. Consum. Behav. 2014, 13, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Uddin, S.M.F.; Khan, M.N. Green Purchasing Behaviour of Young Indian Consumers: An Exploratory Study. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2016, 17, 1469–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khidir ElTayeb, T.; Zailani, S.; Jayaraman, K. The examination on the drivers for green purchasing adoption among EMS 14001 certified companies in Malaysia. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2010, 21, 206–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, O.J.; Ling, K.C.; Piew, T.H. The antecedents of green purchase intention among malaysian consumers. Asian Soc. Sci. 2012, 8, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, Y.X.; Yen, S.Y. Top-management’s role in adopting green purchasing standards in high-tech industrial firms. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramakrishnan, P.; Haron, H.; Goh, Y.N. Factors influencing green purchasing adoption for small and medium enterprises (smes) in malaysia. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2015, 16, 39–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.K.C.; Nguyen, D.M.; Trinh, V.T.; Tran, T.P.D.; Cao, T.P. Factors affecting intention to purchase green products in Vietnam. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2020, 7, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leal, A.R.; Perez-Castillo, D.; Amorós, J.E.; Husted, B.W. Municipal green purchasing in Mexico: Policy adoption and implementation success. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, C.; Wang, M.; Li, W. The impact of motivation, intention, and contextual factors on green purchasing behavior: New energy vehicles as an example. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 1249–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caniëls, M.C.J.; Lambrechts, W.; Platje, J.; Motylska-Kuźma, A.; Fortuński, B. Impressing my friends: The role of social value in green purchasing attitude for youthful consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 303, 126993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S.; Chang, C.H. Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Manag. Decis. 2012, 50, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.H.; Wu, C.W.; Lee, C.T.; Lee, H.J. Green purchase intentions: An exploratory study of the Taiwanese electric motorcycle market. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 829–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awuni, J.A.; Du, J. Sustainable Consumption in Chinese Cities: Green Purchasing Intentions of Young Adults Based on the Theory of Consumption Values. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 24, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishal, A.; Dubey, R.; Gupta, O.K.; Luo, Z. Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behaviour: An empirical study. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2017, 9, 682–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil, M.T.; Jacob, J. The relationship between green perceived quality and green purchase intention: A three-path mediation approach using green satisfaction and green trust. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2018, 15, 301–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kautish, P.; Sharma, R. Value orientation, green attitude and green behavioral intentions: An empirical investigation among young consumers. Young Consum. 2019, 20, 338–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, N.; Saha, R.; Sreedharan, V.R.; Paul, J. Relating the role of green self-concepts and identity on green purchasing behaviour: An empirical analysis. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2020, 29, 3203–3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, W.; Zhang, Q. Green purchase intention: Effects of electronic service quality and customer green psychology. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 267, 122053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nekmahmud, M.; Fekete-Farkas, M. Why not green marketing? Determinates of consumers’ intention to green purchase decision in a new developing nation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Qie, K.; Memon, H.; Yesuf, H.M. The empirical analysis of green innovation for fashion brands, perceived value and green purchase intention-mediating and moderating effects. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, J.G. Effects of a green purchasing strategy: The case of Belfast City Council. Supply Chain Manag. 2000, 5, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yee, F.M.; Shaharudin, M.R.; Ma, G.; Mohamad Zailani, S.H.; Kanapathy, K. Green purchasing capabilities and practices towards Firm’s triple bottom line in Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 307, 127268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.C. Incorporating green purchasing into the frame of ISO 14000. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 927–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamner, B. Effects of green purchasing strategies on supplier behaviour. Green. Supply Chain 2006, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, P.; Ma, X.; Li, G. Developing green purchasing relationships for the manufacturing industry: An evolutionary game theory perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 166, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Benito, J.; Lannelongue, G.; Ferreira, L.M.; Gonzalez-Zapatero, C. The effect of green purchasing on purchasing performance: The moderating role played by long-term relationships and strategic integration. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2016, 31, 312–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foo, M.Y.; Kanapathy, K.; Zailani, S.; Shaharudin, M.R. Green purchasing capabilities, practices and institutional pressure. Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J. 2019, 30, 1171–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naz, F.; Oláh, J.; Vasile, D.; Magda, R. Green purchase behavior of university students in Hungary: An empirical study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siyavooshi, M.; Foroozanfar, A.; Sharifi, Y. Effect of Islamic values on green purchasing behavior. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarabia-Andreu, F.; Sarabia-Sánchez, F.J.; Moreno-Albaladejo, P. A new attitudinal integral-model to explain green purchase intention. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Do Paço, A.; Alves, H.; Shiel, C.; Filho, W.L. Development of a green consumer behaviour model. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2013, 37, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caniëls, M.C.J.; Lambrechts, W.; Platje, J.; Motylska-Kuźma, A.; Fortuński, B. 50 shades of green: Insights into personal values and worldviews as drivers of green purchasing intention, behaviour, and experience. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Wang, X.; Guo, D.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Z. Analysis of factors influencing residents’ habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models: Egoism or altruism? Energy Policy 2018, 116, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K. The green purchase behavior of hong kong young consumers: The role of peer influence, local environmental involvement, and concrete environmental knowledge. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2011, 23, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preuss, L. Green light for greener supply. Bus. Ethics A Eur. Rev. 2002, 11, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lannelongue, G.; González-Benito, J. Opportunism and environmental management systems: Certification as a smokescreen for stakeholders. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 82, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Country | 1998–2005 | 2006–2012 | 2013–2017 | 2018–August 2021 | Total | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
China | 1 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 29 | 20.42% |
India | 1 | - | 6 | 10 | 17 | 11.97% |
Malaysia | - | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 | 10.56% |
Taiwan | - | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4.93% |
Vietnam | - | - | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4.23% |
Poland | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | 2.11% |
Spain | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | 2.11% |
Iran | - | - | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2.11% |
Turkey | - | - | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2.11% |
US | 2 | - | - | 1 | 3 | 2.11% |
Portugal | - | 1 | 2 | - | 3 | 2.11% |
Egypt | - | 2 | - | - | 2 | 1.41% |
UK | 2 | - | - | - | 2 | 1.41% |
Italy | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.41% | ||
Pakistan | 2 | 2 | 1.41% | |||
Hungary | 2 | 2 | 1.41% | |||
Bangladesh | 2 | 2 | 1.41% | |||
Cross country | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 9.86% |
Other countries * | 2 | - | 2 | 11 | 15 | 10.56% |
No country | - | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 6.34% |
Total | 10 | 12 | 36 | 84 | 142 | 100% |
Theory | 1998–2005 | 2006–2012 | 2013–2017 | 2018–2021 | Total | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theory of planned behavior | 2 | 20 | 39 | 61 | 26.64% | |
Theory of reasoned action | 2 | 2 | 13 | 14 | 31 | 13.54% |
Value-Belief-Normative Theory | - | - | 2 | 10 | 12 | 5.24% |
Attitude–Behavior–Context Theory | - | - | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2.62% |
Theory of Consumption Value | - | - | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2.62% |
Norm Activation Theory | - | - | - | 5 | 5 | 2.18% |
Signaling theory | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | 1.31% |
Theory of altruism | - | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | 0.87% |
Social theory | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.87% |
No theory | 6 | 5 | 7 | 17 | 35 | 15.28% |
Other theories | 1 | 6 | 10 | 49 | 66 | 28.82% |
Sections | 1998–2005 | 2006–2012 | 2013–2017 | 2018–2021 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Determinants | 5 | 10 | 28 | 76 | 118 |
(a) Cognitive, Psychological, and sociodemographic | 5 | 6 | 10 | 40 | 61 |
(b) Product attributes | - | - | 7 | 12 | 19 |
(c) Social and environmental factors | - | 3 | 7 | 12 | 22 |
(d) Others | - | 1 | 4 | 11 | 16 |
Effects | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16 |
Others | 1 | - | 4 | 3 | 8 |
Total | 10 | 12 | 36 | 84 | 142 |
Authors | Method and Country | Factors | Results |
---|---|---|---|
[73] | China 274 respondentsSEM | Ecological affect, cultural values, ecological knowledge | The results showed that there is a positive effect of the three factors, with a great emphasis on ecological knowledge and the ecological effect on consumers’ intention to buy green products; so, the more the consumer enjoys ecological knowledge, the greater his orientation towards purchasing green products. |
[77] | China SEM 549 respondents | Ecological affect, degree of collectivism, ecological knowledge, nature orientation | The results show that human nature, collective culture, and ecological effect have a significant positive correlation in determining the intent on green purchasing, while a moderate or little influence was observed regarding ecological knowledge. |
[78] | Egypt ML 1093 respondents | Attitudes, perceived effectiveness, altruism, concern, ecological knowledge, skepticism | The results showed a positive correlation between the availability of these factors towards motivating the consumer to purchase green products, while they showed that there is a negative impact on the consumer’s intention to buy green products when there is skepticism about the environmental claims. |
[74] | China ML 6010 (3035 females, 2975 males) | Gender | The results showed more female interest than male regarding the environmental attitudes, severity of the expected environmental problems, influence of peers, environmental concerns, in addition to green purchasing behavior, while males increased their interest in the role of self-identity in protecting the environment compared with females. |
[79] | Portugal, 186 respondents ML | Age, sex, income, literacy, liberalism, altruism, perceived consumer effectiveness, ecologically conscious | There is a significant effect of altruism and perceived consumers’ effectiveness of the green purchase intentions compared with the rest of the factors. In addition, the results showed a significant effect of ecologically conscious consumers for the green purchase intentions. |
[37] | Turkey 14 survey ML | Skepticism levels, environmental concern | There is a positive effect of green buying intentions when consumers have a great concern for the environment and a low level of skepticism. |
[80] | Cross 163 respondent SEM | Age, ecological knowledge, ecological affect | The results showed that ecological knowledge and environmental concern have an essential effect among young people in promoting green purchasing intention |
[81] | Malaysia PLS 140 respondent | Religious values | Environmental concerns and environmental orientation are affected by the value of religion, which leads to the impact of consumers’ attitudes towards green purchasing. |
[82] | Malaysia 303 respondentsSEM | Skepticism | The results showed that skepticism is one of the main factors that negatively affect consumers’ intentions to buy green, and therefore environmental knowledge and environmental concern may be mediating factors to reduce consumers’ skepticism. |
[27] | Indonesia and Malaysia 504 PLS | Religious values, habit | The results indicate that religious beliefs positively affect the natural environmental orientation, encouraging consumers to move towards green purchases. Moreover, there is an effect of habit in promoting intentions towards green purchases. |
[83] | Taiwan 280 PLS | Anxiety, individual social responsibility | The results show the impact of consumer anxiety about death, which positively affects the consumer’s intention to buy green products. Moreover, the results show that individual social responsibility has a positive role in the intention of green purchase. |
[40] | India 351 consumers. SEM | Culture, behavior, gender | The results show that green purchase intention is positively affected by cultural and behavioral factors in addition to gender, where collectivism is linked to two determinants, which are subjective norms, attitudes where cultural factors and beliefs reinforce the purchase intent. |
[75] | China 573 | Pride, gratitude, guilt, condemnation of others | The study showed that the feeling of pride and gratitude as factors that fall within the positive feelings of the consumer enhance the intentions of green purchase. On the other hand, negative feelings such as the condemnation of others and feelings of guilt have a moderate effect on the purchase intention. The study concluded that the availability of intentions related to avoiding environmental pollution enhances the intentions of green purchase. |
[84] | Poland 650 consumers. ML | Gender, age, personal financial situation, education level, number of children | The results showed that all demographic factors discussed in this study have a positive effect on the intention to buy green, especially among females compared with males. Moreover, the results show that a stable financial situation is an important and basic factor for green buying. |
[85] | China 160 Descriptive | Ambivalent attitudes | The results of the study showed that there is a significant negative effect of ambivalent attitudes towards green buying; this negative effect decreases when the consumer’s mood is good and increases when the consumer’s mood is depressed. |
[86] | China 369 Hierarchical regression | Frugality | The results showed that frugality negatively affects the intention to buy green products as a result of the consumer’s desire to save. |
Authors | Method and Country | Factors | Results |
---|---|---|---|
[106] | Malaysia 132 respondents from a survey ML | Social responsibility, expected business benefits, customer pressures, regulations | The results show that green buying is positively affected by customer pressures, regulations, and expected business benefits, while social responsibility does not represent a motive for green buying. |
[107] | Malaysia 230 respondents ML | Environmental attitude, environmental knowledge, peer pressure, government initiative, eco-label | The results show a high impact of the government initiative in enhancing consumers’ intention towards green purchase. On the contrary, they show the absence of the effect of the environmental label on the intention to buy green products; though the results show a positive impact, it is less compared with the factor of the government initiative in the intention of green purchase. |
[108] | Cross 239 respondents ML | Top management commitment Regulatory pressure, Logistical integration with suppliers, Customer pressure, Environmental investment pressure, Technological integration with suppliers, Environmental collaboration with suppliers | The results show a positive effect of all factors on green purchasing, especially concerning the commitment of senior management. |
[104] | Lebanon 101 respondents Correlation | Perceived environmental responsibility, Perceived effectiveness of environmental behavior, concern for self-image in environmental protection, perceived seriousness of environmental problems, | The results indicate three critical factors influencing green buying behavior: perceived seriousness of environmental problems, perceived environmental responsibility, and concern for self-image in environmental protection. The results also indicate that feeling the seriousness of environmental problems enhances green buying behavior. |
[109] | Malaysia 175 respondents ML | Top management support, government regulations, supplier relationship and perceived benefits, customer pressures | Government regulations, perceived benefits, and customer pressures positively affect the adoption of purchasing green products. |
[110] | Vietnamese 06 responses SEM | Environment Sustainability Awareness, Social Sustainability Awareness, Health Consciousness | Studies indicate that awareness of environmental and social sustainability positively affects customers who are interested in green purchasing, while health consciousness has a negative effect on the intention to buy green products. |
[111] | Mexico 769 ML | Department rules, Complementary environmental practices, and city-wide contracts | The results showed a positive relationship for all factors towards green purchase intention. |
[112] | China interviews descriptive | Behavior motivation, residential characteristics, behavior intentions, social norms, institutional and technological context, behavior ability | The results indicate an indirect effect of behavioral motives on green purchasing through population characteristics, behavior intention, social norms, behavioral capacity, and technological and institutional context, which have a moderate impact on the relationship between behavioral intention and green purchasing decision making. |
[113] | Poland 339 Polish business students ML | Social value | The results show that social factors such as the perceived social value support intentions towards green buying resulting from an implicit belief that it supports the environmental condition. Moreover, the results show that factors stimulate youth’s desire for the environment, including the willingness of young people to look good. At the same time, no incentive supports Youth attitudes towards the environment concerning doing good to society. |
[105] | India 161 respondents regression analysis | Environmental consciousness environmental attitude, environmental involvement, environmental behavior | The results show that there is an effect of these factors on consumers’ intention of green purchasing. |
[35] | Taiwan 353 PLS | Social benefits, individual benefits, willingness-to-pay, e-word-of-mouth, values, self-competence, environmental literacy, environmental responsibility, convenience | The results show that there is a relationship that enhances green purchase intention for all factors except subjective consumer norms. |
Authors | Methodology | Factors | Results |
---|---|---|---|
[114] | Taiwan SEM 258 | Green perceived risk, green perceived value, green trust | The results show a positive relationship with a high impact of green perceived value on green purchase intentions; on the contrary, there is a negative effect of green perceived risk on green purchase intentions. The results show that the relationship between green purchase intentions and other factors is mediated by green trust. |
[115] | Taiwan 305 Respondents ML | Image, value, perceived usefulness, risk | The results support the assumptions that these factors positively influence consumers’ intentions to buy green. |
[116] | China 309 SEM | Epistemic value conditional value, emotional value, Functional value | The results indicate that emotional and social values have a positive association with green buying; while there is a relationship, they are not significantly influential with respect to the rest of the variables. |
[117] | India 500 respondents PLS-SEM | Green purchase attitude, environmental consciousness, green purchase intention, green behavior perceived customer effectiveness | The results show that environmental consciousness positively affects green buying intentions. |
[118] | India 469 PLS-SEM | Green trust, green satisfaction, green perceived quality | The results show that green trust and green satisfaction mediate the relationship between green perceived quality and consumers’ intentions to buy green products. |
[119] | India 410 SEM | Terminal and instrumental values | The results indicate that the terminal and instrumental values significantly affect the behavioral intentions of green products, with a significant effect with respect to the instrumental value compared with the terminal value. |
[120] | India 717 PLS | Green self-identity, green self-concept | The results show an important relationship of these factors in promoting green buying intentions. |
[121] | China 1002 respondents PLS | Electronic service, green word-of-mouth (WOM), greenwashing, consumer social responsibility, green involvement, green trust, green perceived value, | The results show that there is a positive relationship with e-service quality, green trust, consumer social responsibility, and green perceived value on green purchase intentions, while there is a negative relationship with regard to greenwashing. |
[122] | Bangladeshi 638) questionnaire PLS-SEM | Green willingness to purchase, green awareness of price, future estimation of green marketing, green perceived benefits | The green perceived benefits, green willingness to purchase, green awareness of price, and future estimation of green marketing have a strong and positive effect on the decision of customers towards green purchasing. |
[123] | China SEM | Green technology innovation, green product innovation, green image innovation, marketing green innovation, green service innovation | The results show a positive relationship of green innovation, which can effectively enhance green purchase intention. |
Authors | Methodology | Results | |
---|---|---|---|
[6] | UK Content analysis | Environmental performance of companies, and achieving sustainability | Green purchasing contributes to improving the environmental performance of companies, which contributes to achieving sustainability. |
[124] | UK Content analysis | Sustainable development | Green purchasing plays a key role in achieving sustainable development by creating a link between environmental and economic development. |
[126] | Cross descriptive | Sustainable development | Green purchasing plays an important role in achieving sustainability through the development and promotion of clean production technology, reducing environmental impacts that are inappropriate for consumption, working to harmonize management processes, and improving efficiency in a way that enhances the expansion of the financial and environmental performance of the company. |
[127] | Content analysis | Supplier behavior | The study shows that green purchasing might significantly affect the behavior of suppliers when the motive of green supply management aims to achieve and promote sustainable development. |
[128] | China content analysis | Sustainable development, supply chain management | The results indicate that green purchasing plays a key role in supply chain management and recycling, which contributes to promoting sustainable development. |
[129] | Portugal, 100 responses ML | Firm performance | The results showed that the practice of green purchasing enhances the operational performance of companies in a positive way. |
[7] | Japan 239 responses SEM | Environmental performance, economic performance | The results of the study found that green purchasing capabilities represented in dynamic and operational capabilities positively affect both environmental performance and economic performance. |
[68] | Spain (GLS) 122 firms | Financial performance | The results showed that there is no positive relationship between green purchasing and the financial performance of companies. |
[130] | Malaysia interviews descriptive | Triple bottom-line performance | The results of the study showed that the capabilities and practices of green purchasing contribute to enhancing sustainability related to economic and financial performance, such as increasing productivity, profitability, sales, and reducing costs. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hazaea, S.A.; Al-Matari, E.M.; Zedan, K.; Khatib, S.F.A.; Zhu, J.; Al Amosh, H. Green Purchasing: Past, Present and Future. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095008
Hazaea SA, Al-Matari EM, Zedan K, Khatib SFA, Zhu J, Al Amosh H. Green Purchasing: Past, Present and Future. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9):5008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095008
Chicago/Turabian StyleHazaea, Saddam A., Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari, Khaled Zedan, Saleh F. A. Khatib, Jinyu Zhu, and Hamzeh Al Amosh. 2022. "Green Purchasing: Past, Present and Future" Sustainability 14, no. 9: 5008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095008
APA StyleHazaea, S. A., Al-Matari, E. M., Zedan, K., Khatib, S. F. A., Zhu, J., & Al Amosh, H. (2022). Green Purchasing: Past, Present and Future. Sustainability, 14(9), 5008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095008