Influence of Ultrasonic Field Parameters on the Biochemical Activity of Leachates from the Composting Process
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Low intensity from 0 to 1 W/cm2 (acceleration of physiological processes in microorganisms);
- Average intensity from 1 to 3 W/cm2 (acceleration of physiological processes in microorganisms; changes in cell morphology may also occur);
- High intensity from 3 to 10 W/cm2 and more (irreversible cell damage, death).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Characteristics of the Substrate
2.2. Physicochemical Analysis
- -
- Dry solids (DS) and volatile solids (VS) determined in accordance with PN–EN 12880 [20]
- -
- The pH was determined using the potentiometric method (pH measurements were conducted using a 59002-00 pH meter by ColePalmer);
- -
- Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), nitrogen content, dissolved total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and dissolved ammonium nitrogen were determined using the titration method according to standard methods (APHA, 1999) [21];
- -
- Carbon content and dissolved organic carbon were determined using a TOC 10 C Analyzer PX by Kiper, with an AS 40 autosampler by Dione.
2.3. Microbiological Analysis
2.4. Determination of Dehydrogenase (DHA) Activity of Microorganisms in Leachates
2.5. Determination of Respiratory Activity (AR) of Microorganisms in Leachates
- ΔO2—difference between the highest and the lowest oxygen concentration.
- ΔT—time difference.
2.6. Sonicated Leachates
- N—acoustic power (W).
- Es—sonification energy (J).
- ts—sonification time (s).
- I—acoustic wave intensity (W).
- S—area of the surface that the wave passes through (cm3).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Ultrasound of the Leachate—Selection of Amplitude and Sonication Time
3.2. Results of Microbiological Analysis
3.3. Results of Dehydrogenase (DHA) Activity of Microorganisms in Leachates
3.4. Results of Respiratory Activity (AR) Activity of Microorganisms in Leachates
4. Conclusions
- The obtained values of the tested indicators, i.e., dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and respiratory activity (AR) of microorganisms in leachate modified with an ultrasonic field, indicate the potential possibility of using prepared leachates as biopreparations that influence the intensification of the composting process.
- The overtone of compost leachates influenced the increase in the number of mesophilic and thermophilic microorganisms for the amplitude of 30.5 μm in relation to the control sample.
- Sonicated leachate from composting resulted in a decrease in the number of bacteria from the E. coli group, a gradual decrease was observed along with an increase in the amplitude and the time of the leaching of leachate.
- A similar dynamic of changes in dehydrogenase activity (DHA) to changes in mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria, was observed. The level of dehydrogenase activity (DHA) for all the leachate combinations was low, which was related to the collection of the leachate for the thermophilic phase, in which a decline in AD is usually observed.
- The hypersecretion of leachate positively influenced the respiratory activity of microorganisms found in the drips. In the case of sonicated effluents, regardless of the time and amplitude of conditioning, respiratory activity was more than 47% higher than in the control sample.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rokhina, E.V.; Lens, P.; Virkutyte, J. Low-frequency ultrasound in biotechnology: State of the art. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grosser, A.; Neczaj, E.; Madeła, M.; Celary, P. Ultrasound-Assisted Treatment of Landfill Leachate in a Sequencing Batch Reactor. Water 2019, 11, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karami, M.A.; Amin, M.M.; Bina, B. Treatment of Compost Leachate By Ferro sonication Process: Effect of Some Operational Variables. Int. J. Environ. Health Eng. 2018, 7, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Dębowski, M.; Zieliński, M.; Kisielewska, M.; Kazimierowicz, J. Evaluation of Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Wastewater in an Innovative Multi-Section Horizontal Flow Reactor. Energies 2020, 13, 2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, V.K.; Sen, D.J.; Patel, H.U.; Patel, C.N. ChemInform Abstract: Sonochemistry: The Effect of Sonic Waves on Chemical Systems. ChemInform 2011, 42, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, S.; Peng, Y.; Chen, J.; Ki, S.Y. Ultrasound-assisted electrochemical treatment for phenolic wastewater. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 65, 105058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nuengmatcha, P.; Chanthai, S.; Mahachai, R.; Oh, W.C. Sonocatalytic performance of ZnO/graphene/TiO2 nanocomposite for degradation of dye pollutants (methylene blue, texbrite BAC-L, texbrite BBU-L and texbrite NFW-L) under ultrasonic irradiation. Dye. Pigments 2016, 134, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moholkar, V.S.; Rekveld, S.; Warmoeskerken, M.C.G. Modeling of the acoustic pressure fields and the distribution of the cavitation phenomena in dual frequency sonic processor. Ultrasonics 2000, 38, 666–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lőrincz, A. Ultrasonic cellular disruption of yeast in water-based suspensions. Biosys. Eng. 2004, 89, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elpiner, I.E. Ultrasounds, Physicochemical and Biological Effects; PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 1968. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Xie, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, H. Using low intensity ultrasound to improve the efficiency of biological phosphorus removal. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2008, 15, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neis, U.; Plaß, R.; Bode, I. Steuerung der sekundärschlammströme aus der Schlammbehandlung. In 8 Karlsruher Flockungstage: Klärschlamm—Ressource order kostenintensiver Abfall? Hahn, H.H., Ed.; Institut für Siedlungswasserwirtschaft, Universität Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe, Germany, 1994; pp. 91–102. [Google Scholar]
- El-Gohary, F.A.; Kamel, G. Characterization and biological treatment of pre-treated landfill leachate. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 94, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bien, J.; Wolny, L. Investigation of changes in some properties of sewage sludge in the process of conditioning with ultrasonic fields. Eng. Environ. Prot. 2000, 3, 11–16. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Lazzari, L.; Sperni, L.; Salizzato, M.; Pavoni, B. Gas chromatographic determination of micropollutants in samples of sewage sludge and compost: Behaviour of PCB and PAH during composting. Chemosphere 1999, 38, 1925–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, J.E.; Li, S.W. Effect of metals and other inorganic ions on soil microbial activity: Soil dehydrogenase assay as a simple toxicity test. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1985, 34, 858–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrena, R.; Vázquez, F.; Sánchez, A. Dehydrogenase activity as a method for monitoring the composting process. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 905–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Benitez, E.; Sainz, H.; Nogales, R. Hydrolytic enzyme activities of extracted humic substances during the vermicomposting of a lignocellulosic olive waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casida, L.; Klein, D.; Santoro, T. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 1964, 98, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PN—EN 12880. Characteristics of Sewage Sludge—Determination of Dry Residue and Water Content. (In Polish). Available online: https://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-en-12880-2002e.html (accessed on 30 March 2022).
- APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Kacprzak, M.; Fijalkowski, K.; Grobelak, A.; Rosikoń, A.; Rorat, A. Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. Early Diagnosis and Seasonal Monitoring in the Sewage Treatment Process by EMA-qPCR Method. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fijalkowski, K.; Kacprzak, M.; Rorat, A. Occurrence changes of Escherichia coli (including O157:H7 serotype) in wastewater and sewage sludge by quantitation method of (EMA) real time-PCR, Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52, 3965–3972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermanowicz, W.; Dojlido, J.; Dożańska, W.; Koziorowski, B.; Zerbe, J. The Physico-Chemical Analyses of Water and Wastewater; Arkady: Warszawa, Poland, 1999; p. 556. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Rau, B.M.; Chambers, J.C.; Blank, R.R.; Jonson, D.W. Effects Of Fire On Soil Respiration, Atp Content And Enzyme Activities In Mediterranean Maquis. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 61, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolna-Maruwka, A.; Sawicka, A.; Natywa, M.; Dach, J. Dehydrogenases Activity and Changes in the Number of Meso-and Thermophilic Bacteria Uring Sewage Sludge Composting with Various Additives in a Bioreactor. Water-Environ.-Rural Areas 2010, 10, 211–222. [Google Scholar]
- Kamizela, T. The Use of Sonification for Phase Separation in the Thickening of Activated Sludge Suspensions; Monograph of the Czestochowa University of Technology No. 243; Publishing House of the Czestochowa University of Technology: Czestochowa, Poland, 2012. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Tiquia, S.M. Microbiological parameters as indicators of compost maturity. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 99, 816–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Worwag, M. Effect of sewage sludge sonication parameters on the content of organic compounds in the supernatant liquid. Desalination Water Treat. 2020, 199, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sliwinski, A. Ultrasound and Its Application; Scientific and Technical Publishing House: Warsaw, Poland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Kwarciak-Kozłowska, A.; Krzywicka, A. Effect of ultrasonic field to increase the biodegradability of coke processing wastewater. Arch. Waste Manag. Environ. Prot. 2015, 17, 133–142. [Google Scholar]
- Bien, J.; Stepniak, L.; Wolny, L. Ultrasounds in Water Disinfection and Preparation of Sewage Sludge before Dewatering, Monographs No. 37; Publishing House of the Czestochowa University of Technology: Czestochowa, Poland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Stepniak, L. The Use of an Ultrasonic Field to Support the Coagulation Process in Water Treatment, Series Monographs No. 112; Publishing House of the Czestochowa University of Technology: Czestochowa, Poland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Haug, R.T. The Practical Handbook of Compost Engineering; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, J.W.C.; Fang, M. Effects of lime addition on sewage sludge composting process. Water Res. 2000, 34, 3691–3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiquia, S.M.; Judy Wan, H.C.; Nora Tam, F.Y. Dynamics of yard trimmings composting as determined by dehydrogenase activity, ATP content, arginine ammonification, and nitrification potential. Process Biochem. 2002, 37, 1057–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roa, O.L.N.; Ghai, S.K. Urease and dehydrogenase activity of alkali and reclaimed soils. J. Soil Res. 1985, 23, 661–665. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, J.W.C.; Lai, K.M. Effect of an artificial soil mix from coal fly ash and sewage sludge on soil microbial activity. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1996, 23, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolna-Maruwka, A.; Czekała, J.; Piotrowska-Cyplik, A. Determination of the Inactivation Rate of Pathogenic Bacteria in Sewage Sludge Undergoing the Composting Process with Various Additives in a Cybernetic Bioreactor. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2009, 54, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
- Piotrowska-Cyplik, A.; Cyplik, P.; Czarnecki, Z. Measurement of Dehydrogenase Activity and Traditional Method of Microorganisms Count Estimation as Indicators of Microorganisms Activity in Compost from Municipal Sewage Sludge. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2007, 52, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
Index | Unit | Value |
---|---|---|
Dry solids (DS) | (g/L) | 8.9 ± 0.1 |
Volatile solids (VS) | (g/L) | 3.2 ± 0.1 |
pH | - | 7.69 ± 0.2 |
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) | (mg N/L) | 1015 ± 42.0 |
Carbon content | (% DS) | 24.88 ± 1.2 |
Nitrogen content | (%DS) | 0.94 ± 0.01 |
Dissolved organic carbon | (mg C/L) | 1870 ± 25% |
Dissolved total Kjeldahl nitrogen | (mg N/L) | 895 ± 12 |
Dissolved ammonium nitrogen | (mg N–-NH4+/L) | 786.2 ± 20 |
Units | Value | |
---|---|---|
Mesophilic | CFU/cm3 | 185 × 104 ± 15 |
Thermophilic | 380 × 104 ± 8 | |
Fungi | 10 × 104 ± 2 | |
E. coli | cm3 | 10−6 |
Salmonella spp. | 0 |
UD Amplitude | t = 15 s | t = 30 s | t = 60 s | t = 90 s | t = 120 s |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A = 15.25 μm | Es = 450 ± 15 J | Es = 990 ± 25 J | Es = 1860 ± 30 J | Es = 2700 ± 20 J | Es = 3970 ± 30 J |
A = 30.5 μm | Es = 510 ± 10 J | Es = 1050 ± 20 J | Es = 2160 ± 24 J | Es = 3330 ± 22 J | Es = 4680 ± 24 J |
A = 46.0 μm | Es = 540 ± 12 J | Es = 1110 ± 14 J | Es = 2340 ± 14 J | Es = 3600 ± 23 J | Es = 4800 ± 25 J |
UD Amplitude | t = 15 s | t = 30 s | t = 60 s | t = 90 s | t = 120 s |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A = 15.25 μm | I = 1.09 ± 0.05 W/cm2 | I = 1.2 ± 0.1 W/cm2 | I = 1.13 ± 0.04 W/cm2 | I = 1.09 ± 0.1 W/cm2 | I = 1.2 ± 0.1 W/cm2 |
A = 30.5 μm | I = 1.25 ± 0.02 W/cm2 | I = 1.29 ± 0.08 W/cm2 | I = 1.32 ± 0.06 W/cm2 | I = 1.36 ± 0.1 W/cm2 | I = 1.43 ± 0.1 W/cm2 |
A = 46.0 μm | I = 1.32 ± 0.07 W/cm2 | I = 1.36 ± 0.05 W/cm2 | I = 1.43 ± 0.1 W/cm2 | I = 1.47 ± 0.07 W/cm2 | I = 1.47 ± 0.05 W/cm2 |
UD = 15.25 µm | UD = 30.5 µm | UD = 46 µm | |
---|---|---|---|
15 s | 10−5 | 10−4 | 10−4 |
30 s | 10−5 | 10−3 | 10−3 |
60 s | 10−4 | 10−3 | 10−2 |
90 s | 10−4 | 10−2 | 10−2 |
120 s | 10−3 | 10−2 | 10−2 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Worwąg, M.; Zawieja, I. Influence of Ultrasonic Field Parameters on the Biochemical Activity of Leachates from the Composting Process. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095502
Worwąg M, Zawieja I. Influence of Ultrasonic Field Parameters on the Biochemical Activity of Leachates from the Composting Process. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9):5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095502
Chicago/Turabian StyleWorwąg, Małgorzata, and Iwona Zawieja. 2022. "Influence of Ultrasonic Field Parameters on the Biochemical Activity of Leachates from the Composting Process" Sustainability 14, no. 9: 5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095502
APA StyleWorwąg, M., & Zawieja, I. (2022). Influence of Ultrasonic Field Parameters on the Biochemical Activity of Leachates from the Composting Process. Sustainability, 14(9), 5502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095502