Next Article in Journal
Analysis Regarding the Implementation of the Circular Economy in Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Growth Suitability Evaluation of Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr Based on Potential NPP under Different Climate Scenarios
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characteristics of Spatial–Temporal Variations in Coupling Coordination between Industrial Water Use and Industrial Green Development Systems in China

Business School, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(1), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010330
Submission received: 30 November 2022 / Revised: 19 December 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 25 December 2022

Abstract

:
The coupling coordination between industrial water use (IWU) and industrial green development (IGD) systems is crucial for achieving sustainable development goals. This paper measures the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems, and the spatial–temporal evolution characteristics of the degree are discussed. Here, the IWU system is assessed by adopting a dynamic slacks-based measure model, and the IGD system’s performance is evaluated using an entropy-weighted TOPSIS model. The results showed that: (1) The provincial IWU efficiency showed a rising trend from 2009 to 2018 in general, while its spatial dimension showed a distribution of high in the eastern region and low in the western region. (2) The IGD performance in the eastern region was better than that in the central and western regions; the gap in industrial innovation and industrial resources was the main factor. (3) The spatial structure of the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems was gradually stable. It also had a strong spatial dependence and its evolution volatility has been enhanced. (4) The coupling coordination was improving but exhibited a dynamic local spatial dependence and volatile process, and its spatial agglomeration had a relatively higher path dependence and locked spatial features.

1. Introduction

Since 1978, rapid industrial progress has contributed irreplaceably to China’s economic development [1,2]. However, due to the blind pursuit of economic development speed, rough industrial production leads to resource problems, and environmental management becomes the bottleneck restricting economic development. China’s industry has yet to shake off the development pattern of high consumption and emissions [3], particularly evident in the industrial water use (IWU) system. In 2020, China’s IWU reached 121.80 million tons, and the corresponding industrial wastewater discharge reached 2.07 million tons [4]. Among the direct pollution sources, the wastewater discharge from industrial pollution sources is second only to that of comprehensive sewage outlets [5], which is far behind the wastewater discharge standard of developed countries.
Since 2016, China has vigorously advocated the industrial green development (IGD) to promote high-quality industrial sustainable development in the 13th and 14th Five-Year Plans while protecting the environment and conserving resources. Made in China 2025 and Industrial Green Development Plan (2016–2020) pointed out that China’s industrial development has entered the green transformation period. Besides, as a typical water-deficient country, improving the IWU efficiency is particularly important in promoting IGD, which needs a series of policy guidelines and legal guarantees as the basis. The formulation of these policies and laws must be based on the scientific evaluation of IWU and IGD systems. Such assessment can also provide policymakers with quantitative information to help them conduct policy analysis effectively [6].
Water is an unrecognized but essential connecting factor to achieving sustainable development goals, so the practical analysis of the relationship between IWU and IGD systems is of great significance to industrial green and sustainable development in China. However, there are few types of research on the relationship between IWU and IGD systems, mainly investigating the relationship between IGD system and carbon emissions or technological innovation system. Feng and Chen [7] adopted the spatial Dubin model to explore the spatial impact of environmental regulation and technological innovation in the IGD system. Wang et al. [8] adopted the entropy weight method and grey relation analysis to construct the IGD and regional non-waste systems, respectively. They explored the relationship between these two systems through the improved coupling coordination model. It is also found that the technology innovation system significantly positively affects the IGD system [3]. Wang et al. [9] discussed the impact of carbon abatement and technological innovation systems on the IGD system. Dong et al. [10] discussed how industrial convergence affects the IGD system. Mennicken et al. [11] believed that adequate investment in carbon emissions reduction and technological innovation systems could effectively promote IGD. However, only a few previous researchers have discussed the relationship between the IGD and the IWU systems. Most research involving the IWU system only discussed the relationships between industrial economic growth and total consumption or the intensity of IWU [12,13,14,15], which need to be more. Furthermore, the spatial–temporal evolution characteristics of the degree have yet to be discussed in depth. This is the gap that our research is trying to fill.
IWU efficiency is the main index for reflecting the performance of the IWU system. At present, the measurement models of water use efficiency can be mainly divided into the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) [16,17,18] and data envelopment analysis (DEA) [19,20,21]. However, the SFA model has a few limitations. It is only suitable for one output scenario, and whether the result is mainly correct depends on the predicted forms of the production functions. The DEA model does not need to set the functional forms and can overcome these shortages of subjective indicator selection and weighting. Then, this paper adopts the DEA model to measure the IWU efficiency. Compared to the traditional DEA model, the slack-based measure (SBM) model could directly deal with the output excess and output insufficiency of relevant decision-making units and is not affected by the whole statistical data set, so the results are more effective [22,23].
Since green development was put forward [24], the cores of relevant definitions emphasize that economic and environmental benefits can be improved through environmentally friendly financial behaviors to achieve sustainable development goals [25,26,27,28]. As a component of green development, IGD has gradually become the focus of academic research with the development of new industrialization. The Global Reporting Initiative presented a global sustainability index considering the economic, environmental and social dimensions to reveal the IGD [29]. OECD [30] established a complete indicator system of green development composed of economy, environment, and human well-being. Liu et al. [31] measured the IGD degree in China based on three aspects: environment, economy, and technology. Wang et al. [27] constructed the evaluation index system of the IGD based on three aspects: Environment, economy, and society. Wang et al. [32] revealed the differences of the IGD system in China’s three major urban agglomerations from the aspects of the environment, resources, and society by adopting entropy-weighted TOPSIS. Wang et al. [33] measured the performance of the IGD system in China from the perspective of resource consumption and environmental pollution. Economy, environment and technology are the main aspects for selecting assessing indicators to evaluate the performance of the IGD System.
Due to the unbalanced distribution of industrial sectors and further technological development, the quantitative relationships between IWU and IGD systems of provinces present spatial differences. Traditional exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) and mathematical statistics can effectively reflect the spatial differences, spatial distribution, and spatial correlation [34,35,36,37,38]. With the rapid development of China’s industry, it is of great significance to analyze the quantitative relationship between IWU and IGD systems in the temporal dimension for industrial adjustment and technological upgrading. However, traditional ESDA and mathematical statistics are difficult to represent either the characteristics spatial correlation or temporal dimension [39]. Exploratory spatial–temporal data analysis (ESTDA) can integrate temporal dimension analysis into spatial analysis more effectively and has been widely used in the analysis of land use, resource utilization, pollution control and other fields. Dong et al. [10] adopted ESTDA to reveal the spatial–temporal dynamics of the multidimensional poverty index in China from 2007 to 2017. By applying ESTDA, Zhang et al. [40] analyzed China’s carbon footprint’s spatial pattern and dynamic spatial–temporal interaction from 2001 to 2013. Liu et al. [41] used ESTDA and the spatial econometric model to analyze the spatial–temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of PM2.5 in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Li et al. [42] analyzed the spatial–temporal dynamic evolution of GDP per capita for 2303 counties in China from 1998 to 2015 based on the ESTDA framework.
Based on the above analysis, we could find that existing research focuses more on the interaction between the IGD system and technological innovation or energy system, but few study the relationship between IWU and IGD systems. Besides, the method involved is not able to evaluate the dynamic evolution between systems effectively. In the coupling framework between resource and economic systems, this research focuses on the coupling coordination relationship between IWU and IGD systems and discusses its temporal and spatial variations to provide policy suggestions for achieving sustainable development goals. The objectives of this study are as follows: (1) Construct an index system to evaluate the performance of IWU and IGD systems. (2) Propose a new coupling coordination framework to evaluate the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems. (3) Reveal the characteristics of spatial–temporal variations in coupling coordination degree by adopting ESTDA.
The remaining structure of the article is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the construction of an index system, methods, and data acquisition. Section 3 presents the evaluation results and discussion of this research. In Section 4, the conclusions, limitations, and future research directions are provided.

2. Methodology and Data

2.1. Coupling Coordination Indicator and Methods

This paper constructs a coupling coordination framework between IWU and IGD systems, as shown in Figure 1. Firstly, A dynamic SBM model considering undesirable output referred by Tone [22] to evaluate the IWU efficiency from 2009 to 2018. Referring to existing research [19,43,44], we chose industrial employment, and water use as input indicators, industrial fixed assets as a carry-over indicator, industrial value added as desirable output indicators, and industrial wastewater discharge as undesirable output indicators.
The traditional TOPSIS model is difficult to eliminate the influence of the order of magnitude of index data on index weight. In order to eliminate this method bias, the entropy weight method is combined with the TOPSIS model. Based on the entropy-weighted TOPSIS model referred by existing research [45,46], this paper puts forward a new index system to measure the performance of the IGD system, which involves industrial economy, industrial environment, industrial resources, and industrial innovation by integrating existing research [31,32,33] and Industrial Green Development Plan 2016–2020 issued by the Chinese government, as shown in Table 1.
A coupling degree is a quantitative method for measuring the interaction in two or more systems. The coupling degree model of IWU and IGD systems is constructed by referring to relevant research [47], as shown in Equation (1).
C = f ( x ) g ( y ) / [ ( f ( x ) + g ( y ) ) / 2 ] 2 k
where C is the coupling degree between IWU and IGD systems, 0 < C < 1, the greater the value of C is, the better the coupling is. f(x) and g(y) are the IWU efficiency and the performance of IGD, respectively. k is the adjustment coefficient, 2 ≤ k ≤ 5, which is determined by the number of subsystems in the coupling degree model, and the value of k is 2 in this research.
The coupling coordination model is used to further discuss the coupling characteristics between IWU and IGD systems, and analyze the synergistic effect and overall efficacy of these two systems, as shown in Equation (2).
D = C × T , T = α f ( x ) + β g ( y )
D is the coupling coordination degree of IWU and IGD systems, T is the comprehensive coordination index, α and β are the undetermined coefficients, and α + β = 1. Referring to previous research [48], this paper considers that IGD system is slightly more important than IWU system, α = 0.4, β = 0.6. The coupling coordination degree can be divided into five stages, as shown in Table 2.

2.2. Exploratory Spatial-Temporal Data Analysis

ESTDA integrates temporal and spatial features of geographic data to realize spatial–temporal interaction analysis. It can effectively reveal spatial distribution pattern changes of research objects [49,50]. ESTDA consists of LISA time path analysis, LISA spatial–temporal transition, spatial Markov chain, and other main research methods. LISA time path analysis and LISA spatial–temporal transition are adopted to reveal the characteristics of spatial–temporal variations in the coupling coordination degree.

2.2.1. LISA Time Path Analysis

LISA time path analysis presents the spatial–temporal cooperative changes and dynamic characteristics of geographic variables in the region by measuring the stability level of LISA coordinates composed of attribute variables and spatial lag in Moran’s scatter plot [51]. The spatial–temporal interaction and dynamic characteristics of the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems are explained by the pairwise movement of the coupling coordination degree and its spatial lag value over time. The geometric characteristics of the LISA time path mainly include relative length (Γi) and tortuosity (fi). Their respective expressions are shown in Equations (3) and (4).
Γ i = n × t = 1 T 1 d L i , t , L i , t + 1 i = 1 n t = 1 T 1 d L i , t , L i , t + 1
f i = t = 1 T 1 d L i , t , L i , t + 1 d L i , 1 , L i , T
L i , t is the LISA coordination of unit i in year t, and d L i , t , L i , t + 1 is the distance coordination of unit i from year t to year t + 1. If the coordination movement length of unit i is greater than the overall average level within the research time range, then Γi is greater than 1. The larger Γi is, the more significant the dynamic change of coupling coordination degree is, and vice versa. The larger fi is, the more curved LISA time path is. That is, unit i is more affected by neighborhood space (spillover/polarization) and its spatial evolution is more unstable.

2.2.2. LISA Spatial-Temporal Transition

LISA time path describes the geometric characteristics of the time trajectory of each space unit moving on Moran’s I scatter plot, while the spatial–temporal transition further reveals the spatial relationship between the neighborhood in different local areas. Rey [50] embedded the attributes such as distance, direction, and condensation of each spatial unit in Moran’s I scatter plot into the classic Markov chain and proposed Local Moran Markov transition and spatial–temporal transition.
Movement direction of Moran’s I scatter can be divided into four types: HH (0°–90°), HL (90°–180°), LL (180°–270°), and LH (270°–360°). HH is the high–high state, indicating the positive synergistic movement/development of unit i and its adjacent units. LL is the low-low state, indicating the negative synergistic movement/development of unit i and its adjacent units. HL and LH are high-low and low-high states, respectively, representing the movement/development directions of unit i and its adjacent units are opposite.
There are four types of LISA spatial–temporal transitions: I, II, III and IV. Type I transition includes HH→HH, HL→HL, LH→LH, LL→LL, indicating that unit i and its adjacent units have no transition during the research period. Type II transition includes HH→LH, HL→LL, LH→HH, LL→HL, meaning that unit i has its transition, but its adjacent units do not have a transition. The type III transition includes HL→HH, HH→HL, LL→LH, LH→LL, indicating that unit i itself has no change, but its adjacent units have a transition. The type IV transition includes LL→HH, LH→HL, HL→LH, HH→LL, indicating that both unit i and its adjacent units have transitions. Further, type IV transition can be divided into types IV1 (LL→HH, HH→LL) and IV2. The types IV1 (LH→HL, HL→LH) indicate that unit i and its adjacent units have the same direction of transitions, while type IV2 does the opposite. The details are shown in Table 3.
Spatial–temporal flow (SF) and spatial–temporal condensation (SC) were used to characterize the path dependence of the spatial pattern of the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems, as shown in Equations (5) and (6).
S F = N II + N III M
S C = N I + N IV 2 M
In Equations (5) and (6), Nj is the number of units in type j; M is the number of samples.

2.3. Research Area and Data Acquisition

The comparison object selected here is China’s provincial administrative regions. By evaluating the relationship between IWU and IGD systems in each province, problems in industrial green transformation could be analyzed. In line with this idea, 30 provinces in China are selected as evaluation units, and the research period is from 2009 to 2018. Tibet, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan are not included in the assessment due to the lack of data.
The total debt ratio of industrial enterprises above designated size, total profits of industrial enterprises above designated size, the full-time equivalent of industrial R&D employees, number of industrial R&D employees, number of industrial valid patents, and number of new industrial products are obtained from the database of the National Bureau of Statistics. Industrial tailpipe emissions, industrial wastewater discharge, industrial tailpipe purification, and industrial wastewater purification are brought from China Environmental Statistical Yearbook (2010–2020). Industrial employment, industrial water use consumption, industrial energy consumption, the industrial fixed assets stock, and the industrial value added are obtained from the China Industrial Statistical Yearbook (2010–2020) and China Statistical Yearbook (2010–2020). The remaining indicators are calculated from the corresponding raw data above.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Industrial Water Use System

The IWU efficiency of each province during 2009–2018 is presented in Table 4. The IWU efficiency of most provinces was less than one, indicating that the IWU of these provinces needs to be optimized. On the whole, the IWU efficiency of each province presented an upward trend. From 2009 to 2018, the average IWU efficiency increased from 0.401 to 0.703, with an increase of about 75.19%. The improvement of IWU efficiency is closely related to the promulgation of water-related policies, including establishing a strict water resource management system, strictly controlling water for production, and effective wastewater treatment.
During 2009–2018, Chongqing, Jiangsu, Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong ranked in the top five. The mean values of their IWU efficiency were 0.906, 0.897, 0.889, 0.872, and 0.846, respectively. Chongqing is located in the core of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. It is a critical area of the Chinese government’s western development plan and a vital pilot area of IGD. The resource advantage, policy guarantee, and industrial adjustment ensure that the IWU efficiency of Chongqing consistently ranked first in the western region. The remaining four provinces are all in the eastern region, which have advanced industrial structure and economic foundation and are in the first echelon of the national industrial transfer and industrial restructuring. They have banned industries with high water use consumption, adopted advanced water-saving technologies, and formulated strict water policies.
Ningxia, Gansu, Guizhou, Fujian, and Shaanxi were the five provinces with lower IWU efficiency. The mean values of their IWU efficiency were 0.409, 0.437, 0.441, 0.455, and 0.493, respectively. In these provinces, the problems, such as unbalanced economic development, low awareness of water conservation, and the widespread existence of industries with high water use consumption, lead to the waste of water resources in industrial production and low water use efficiency. However, there is no denying that the IWU in all the provinces mentioned above has improved since 2011 (the beginning of the 12th Five-Year Plan), which is due to the Chinese government’s increasing emphasis on IGD, developing the recycling industry and optimizing the comprehensive utilization of water resources.

3.2. Analysis of Industrial Green Development System

Table 5 presents the index weights of China’s IGD system based on the entropy-weighted TOPSIS model. The four primary indexes indicators are ranked as follows: Industrial economy (27.23%) > Industrial innovation (26.51%) > Industrial resources (24.98%) > Industrial environment (21.28%). Economic development is still the primary goal of IGD, which is a necessary foundation to support the implementation of China’s 14th Five-Year Plan. Industrial innovation is also a prerequisite required to improve industrial production efficiency, reduce resource consumption and reduce environmental pollution, and it plays the leading role in the IGD systems. The Chinese government has been increasing investment in industrial innovation in recent years. Industrial resource consumption and industrial pollution are important indexes to measure the sustainability and environmental friendliness of the IGD system.
The top five secondary indexes are as follows: Number of industrial R&D employees (8.70%) > value-added growth rate (8.32%) > industrial energy consumption (7.33%) > labor productivity (7.30%) > industrial water use consumption (7.21%). Number of industrial R&D employees is the industrial innovation index. China’s industrial structure is transforming; energy-intensive and inefficient heavy industries still occupy a large proportion of the industry, which is a significant cause of high energy and resource consumption and heavy pollution. Increasing investment in industrial innovation can not only support the adjustment of industrial structure but also drive the IGD [51]. Value-added growth rate and Labor productivity are the important indexes to measure the performance of the industrial economy. As the supporting industry of the national economy, industry bears the critical responsibility of promoting social and economic development. The other two indexes are industrial resources indexes. Resource consumption and environmental pollution is the bottleneck restricting the IGD. Since the 12th Five-Year Plan period, the Chinese government has made great efforts to introduce advanced industrial production technology and increase investment in environmental pollution control to ensure the green transformation of industrial enterprises.
Table 6 shows the performance of the IGD system of 30 provinces in China. From 2009 to 2018, IGD has been improved in most provinces. Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Tianjin, Beijing, and Guangdong were the six provinces with outstanding performance in the IGD system, and the mean values of their performance of the IGD system exceeded 0.4. They are all the most advanced industrial provinces in China and are all located in the eastern region. Compared with other provinces, they have a complete and efficient industrial structure and are the earliest provinces to promote industrial adjustment. Based on a strong economy, they have vigorously developed high-tech industries, increased investment in environmental pollution control, and eliminated industries with high resource consumption and pollution. Excellent transportation and geographical conditions also ensure their access to advanced production technology, foreign investment, and policy preferences.
The provinces in the central region, such as Anhui, Shanxi, and Jilin, were in the second group. Although their performance was not as good as that of the provinces in the eastern region, it should not be ignored that their IGD has maintained an annual growth rate of more than 4%. In recent years, the provinces in the central region have increased cooperation with provinces in the eastern region to introduce advanced energy-saving and water-saving technologies. Since the implementation of the Plan on the Rise of the Central Region [52], the Chinese government has increased the policy preference for the provinces in the central region, especially allocating funds to recruit R&D employees and attract investment for these provinces, to build them into modern equipment manufacturing and high-tech industrial bases. At the same time, the government strictly controlled environmental pollution to ensure the sustainable development of the industrial economy.
The provinces in the western region were at the bottom in terms of the performance of the IGD system during 2009–2018. As the only municipality directly under the central government in the western region, the industrial development of Chongqing was very rapid. Except for Chongqing, the IGD degree of other provinces in the western region increased slowly, and even Guangxi, Ningxia and Qinghai showed a downward trend. Compared with other provinces in the western region, Chongqing is more attractive to foreign investment and has easier access to high technology, supporting its IGD. Other provinces in the western region, in order to ensure economic growth, undertake the backward industries eliminated from the central and eastern regions more, resulting in the intensification of resource consumption and environmental pollution.
As shown in Table 6 and Figure 2, there were only two provinces (Jiangsu and Zhejiang) whose performance of the IGD system was greater than 0.4 in 2009, while in 2018, there were six provinces (Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin, Shandong and Chongqing) whose IGD degree was greater than 0.4. Figure 2 also presents the composition of the IGD degree in 2009 and 2018. Obviously, except for Shaanxi, the industrial economic index score ratio to the IGD degree has decreased in the other 29 provinces. The slowdown in economic growth is one reason for this phenomenon. More importantly, the Chinese government is paying more and more attention to water consumption and industrial environment control instead of focusing solely on the industrial economy. Compared to 2009, the scores of industrial resources and industrial environment increased significantly in most provinces in 2018, especially the provinces in the eastern and central regions. A strong economy can support enough investment in industrial innovation. Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, Chongqing, Beijing, and Tianjin, all of which are economically developed regions, experienced the most noticeable increase in industrial innovation.

3.3. Analysis of Coupling Coordination

The coupling coordination model is used to calculate the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems during 2009–2018, and the results are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. By 2018, the five provinces with the highest coupling degree are Zhejiang (0.980), Shanghai (0.969), Jiangsu (0.950), Tianjin (0.948), and Henan (0.908). The five provinces with the lowest coupling degree were Xinjiang (0.190), Qinghai (0.210), Jiangsu (0.255), Guangxi (0.294), and Hainan (0.301). During the research period, the coupling degree of the provinces in the eastern region remained high, and the fluctuation range was small. Their coupling degree was mainly in the high coupling stage and run-in stage. The coupling degree of provinces in the central region decreased and then increased. The coupling development between IWU and IGD systems in these provinces experienced a process from deterioration to improvement. The coupling degree of provinces in the western region was generally low. Except for Chongqing, the coupling degree of other provinces was mainly in low couple stage and irrelevant stage. As shown in Figure 4a, from 2009 to 2013, the number of provinces in low couple stage and irrelevant stage generally showed an increasing trend. After a decline in 2014, they showed an increasing trend until reaching a peak in 2016 and falling back from 2016 to 2018. The number of provinces in the high coupling stage and run-in stage generally showed a downward trend. After a sudden increase in 2014, they showed a downward trend until reaching the bottom in 2016, and showed an upward trend from 2016 to 2018.
In Figure 3, the coupling coordination degree of the 23 provinces showed an upward trend during 2009–2018. In 2009 (Figure 3a), Zhejiang (0.674), Jiangsu (0.668), Shanghai (0.665), Chongqing (0.616), and Beijing (0.591) ranked among the top five. In 2018 (Figure 3j), Jiangsu (0.859), Zhejiang (0.836), Shanghai (0.817), Beijing (0.796), and Tianjin (0.759) ranked the top five. In these provinces, the construction of efficient IWU system and well-considered IGD system ensure that their coupling coordination degree has been maintained at a high value. On the contrary, the coupling coordination degree of the other 7 provinces (Guangxi, Hainan, Liaoning, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang) all decreased during the research period. Among these seven provinces, the IWU efficiency of Liaoning and Hainan has been effectively improved. Nonetheless, their IGD degree was always low, which affected the coupling and coordinated development between IWU and IGD systems. Guangxi, Gansu, Ningxia, Xinjiang, and Qinghai performed poorly in the IWU and IGD systems, ranking at the bottom of the 30 provinces. These provinces scored low in industrial resources, industrial environment, and innovation, leading to the decline of their coupling coordination degree between the IWU and IGD systems.
Obviously, as shown in Figure 4, the research period can be divided into two stages: 2009 to 2013 (Figure 4a) and 2014 to 2018 (Figure 4b). During 2009–2013, 30 provinces have developed just four kinds of coupling coordination stages. The numbers of provinces in the high dysregulation stage were 0, 0, 5, 5, and 3, respectively. The numbers of provinces in the basic dysregulation stage were 11, 13, 12, 11, and 14, respectively. The numbers of provinces in the run-in stage were 15, 13, 7, 6, and 6, respectively. The numbers of provinces in the basic coordination were 4, 4, 6, 8, and 7, respectively. During this period, the coupling and coordinated development between IWU and IGD systems deteriorated. There were no provinces in the high coordination stage, the number of provinces in the high dysregulation stage and basic dysregulation stage showed an upward trend. Provinces in the run-in stage were gradually changed to basic dysregulation stage and high dysregulation stage. During 2014–2018, 30 provinces developed five kinds of coupling coordination stages. The numbers of provinces in the high dysregulation stage were 0, 3, 1, 3, and 0, respectively. The number of provinces in the basic dysregulation stage was 9, 11, 13, 10, and 8, respectively. The number of provinces in the run-in stage was 11, 7, 7, 8, and 10, respectively. The provinces in the basic coordination stage were 7, 6, 5, 8, and 9, respectively. The provinces in the high coordination stage were 7, 6, 5, 8, and 9, respectively. Compared with the previous period, the provincial coupling coordinated development has been improved. Number of provinces in the high dysregulation stage and basic dysregulation stage showed a downward trend, the number of provinces in the high coordination stage increased gradually. Provinces in the run-in stage and basic dysregulation stage gradually changed to the basic coordination stage.

3.4. Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Coupling Coordination

3.4.1. LISA Time Path Analysis

Based on the evolution characteristics of the coupling coordination degree shown in Section 3.3 (Figure 3 and Figure 4), the research period was divided into two development stages: 2009–2013 and 2014–2018. The relative length, tortuosity, and movement direction of coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems in China were calculated based on the LISA time path, as shown in Figure 5.
Based on the natural break point method in ArcGIS and manual classifications, the relative lengths of the LISA time path were classified into a low relative length (Γi < 0.33), medium relative length (0.33 < Γi < 0.9), higher relative length (0.9 < Γi < 1.3), and high relative length (Γi > 1.3) (Figure 5a,b). During 2009–2013, there were 11 provinces with a relative length greater than one. There were nine provinces with higher relative length and six provinces with high relative length, these provinces included Xinjiang, Yunnan, Jilin, Shanxi, Henan, and Anhui, indicating that the local spatial structure was highly dynamic. In contrast, there were 14 provinces with medium relative length, and only Shanghai was in low relative length. These provinces, such as Shanghai, Jiangsu, Shandong, Fujian, Anhui, Beijing, Tianjin, Chongqing, and Sichuan, are mostly located in the eastern and central region, with stable local spatial structures. During 2014–2018, there were 14 provinces with a relative length greater than 1. Although the proportion of provinces with relative length greater than the national average increased, only Henan was in high relative length. Moreover, the number of provinces with low relative length increased to seven. Generally, during 2009–2018, the spatial structure of the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems was gradually stable and the spatial structure of the eastern region is more robust than that of the central and western regions.
Similarly, the tortuosity of the LISA time path was classified into a low tortuosity (0.45 < fi < 3.24), medium tortuosity (3.24 < fi < 8.22), higher tortuosity (8.22 < fi < 19.58), and high tortuosity (19.58 < fi < 67.32) (Figure 5c,d). During 2009–2013, In all provinces except Shanghai, the tortuosity was more significant than 1, indicating that most provinces were affected by the spatial dependence of local structures to varying degrees. Gansu and Henan were in high tortuosity, and Jiangsu and Qinghai were in higher tortuosity. It reflected the solid dynamic characteristics of their spatial transition process. A total of 18 provinces were in low tortuosity, accounting for 60%, and these provinces presented a continuous patchy distribution. During 2014–2018, the tortuosity of all provinces was more significant than 1, indicating that all provinces were affected by the spatial dependence of local structures. Jiangsu and Zhejiang were in high tortuosity, Guangdong, Qinghai, Gansu, Inner Mongolia, Hebei, Shandong, and Henan were in higher tortuosity, thus reflecting the intense volatility of the spatial dependence of coupling coordination degree in these provinces and a dynamic change process among these provinces and their neighborhoods. The provinces with low tortuosity decreased to only seven, accounting for 23.33%. In contrast, the proportion of provinces with high and higher tortuosity increased to 30%, indicating that the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems had a strong spatial dependence. Its evolution volatility has been enhanced during the research period.
The LISA movement direction was used to characterize the spatial integration of the spatial variation in the coupling coordination between IWU and IGD systems in China. Four types were delineated by referring to the average level. As shown in Figure 5e,f, during 2009–2013, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin, Shandong, Fujian, Henan, and Hubei showed a synergistic high growth trend, while Chongqing, Guizhou, Guangdong, and Shanxi showed a synergistic negative growth trend. Provinces with high synergistic growth are mainly located in the eastern region, while those with low synergistic growth are primarily located in the western region. During 2014–2018, the number of provinces with high synergistic growth decreased from eight to seven, and the number of provinces with low synergistic growth increased from three to five, indicating that the spatial integration of the spatial evolution in coupling coordination was slightly enhanced in this period compared to the previous period. The spatial variation of the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems in China performed differently in the east, central, and western regions. This situation remains consistent in the short term.

3.4.2. LISA Spatial-Temporal Transition

This paper constructs the spatial–temporal transition matrix to explore the transfer characteristics of the local correlation types of coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems. In Table 7, from 2009 to 2018, LL/LL had the highest transfer probability (0.333) with 91 samples. In terms of the transition type, the most common transition was Type I, which had a ratio of 82%, thus indicating that the spatial agglomeration of coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems had a relatively higher path dependence and locked spatial features. The reason was that, in the process of rapid industrialization, the low IWU efficiency and low IGD degree caused by the resource-intensive industrial development mode could not be changed in the short term. The ratios of transition types II, III, and IV were 0.078, 0.067, and 0.033, respectively, thus reflecting that the internal factors of the unit had a more significant impact on their concentration of coupling coordination than the neighborhood overflow. The SF was only 0.144, and SC was 0.841 from 2009 to 2018. It indicates that the distribution of coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems in China has strong transfer sluggishness, and the coupling coordination degree was relatively stable.

4. Conclusions, Limitations, and Future Research Directions

4.1. Conclusions

This paper used the dynamic SBM model and the entropy-weighted TOPSIS model to measure the IWU efficiency and the performance of the IGD system of 30 provinces in China, respectively. Further, a new coupling coordination framework measures the interaction between IWU and IGD systems. The spatial–temporal pattern and path evolution characteristics of the coupling coordination degree are reasonably analyzed using the ESTDA framework. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
In terms of temporal dimension, the IWU efficiency of each province showed an overall rising trend. In contrast, in terms of spatial extent, it showed a distribution of high in the east region and low in the west region. The IGD degree of the provinces in the eastern region was better than that in the central and western regions; the main reason is the gap in industrial innovation and resources.
(2)
The coupling coordination between IWU and IGD systems was getting better. Overall, the number of provinces in high coordination showed an increasing trend, and the number of provinces in high dysregulation showed a downward trend. Nevertheless, the coupling coordination degree showed apparent regional differences in the eastern, central, and western regions, and some poorly performing provinces still need to improve efficiently.
(3)
The spatial structure of the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems was gradually stable, and the spatial structure of the eastern region is more robust than that of the central and western regions. The coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems had a strong spatial dependence, and its evolution volatility has been enhanced during the research period.
(4)
There was a dynamic local spatial dependence and volatile process in the coupling coordination degree between IWU and IGD systems. Its spatial agglomeration had a relatively higher path dependence and locked spatial features.
Based on the above results, some relevant policy suggestions are put forward. First, strengthen regional governance, and formulate "common but differentiated" industrial water resources utilization and IGD strategy. The eastern region should lead in efficiently utilizing IWU and IGD systems. The central and western regions should close down industries with high water use consumption and reduce excess capacity while actively protecting the environment and increasing investment in innovation. Second, establish the regional joint prevention and control system to supervise industrial water conservation and environmental protection. Third, vigorously develop green industries, adjust industrial structure, and advocate low water consumption industrial economy to achieve industrial sustainable development.

4.2. Limitations and Future Research Directions

By constructing the coupling coordination framework between IWU and IGD systems, this paper provides a reference for the coordinated development of ecology and economy, but there are still areas for improvement to be filled. Due to the limited data availability, we did not include research data after 2020 in this research. However, it is undeniable that after 2020, China’s industrial green development has been rapid, which has a very representative research value. This also leads to a decrease in the representativeness of the research. In terms of pollutant discharge, the pollutant discharge considered in this paper mainly includes wastewater discharge and tailpipe emission. We did not consider solid waste discharges that might influence the research results. At the same time, different types of tailpipe emission and wastewater discharge have a massive difference in the impact of environmental pollution and management, which is not included in the analysis. The influence of government policy priorities and residents’ environmental awareness is also essential. The data and content must be further supplemented and improved in future research. The factors that affect the coupling coordination between IWU and IGD systems are complex and affected by complex factors at different scales. More is needed to discuss the spatial–temporal distribution of the coupling coordination degree. To ensure the reliability and universality of the research, the influence mechanism of various factors on coupling coordination degree should be discussed emphatically in future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.P.; methodology, Q.P.; investigation, Q.P.; Empirical analysis, H.H.; investigation, H.H.; data resources, H.H.; Visualization, L.Z.; supervision, L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The finance of this paper is supported by the Humanities and Social Science Research General Project of the Ministry of Education of China (No.22YJAZH086), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B220207024).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the request of the data provider.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, C.; Han, J.; Fan, P. Measuring the Level of Industrial Green Development and Exploring Its Influencing Factors: Empirical Evidence from China’s 30 Provinces. Sustainability 2016, 8, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Li, X.; Du, J.; Long, H. Mechanism for Green Development Behavior and Performance of Industrial Enterprises (GDBP-IE) Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fei, R.; Cui, A.; Qin, K. Can technology R&D continuously improve green development level in the open economy? Empirical evidence from China’s industrial sector. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 34052–34066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. MWRPRC. China Water Resources Bulletin; China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. NBSPRC. China Environmental Statistics Yearbook; National Bureau of Statistics of China: Beijing, China, 2020.
  6. Wang, X.; Li, Y. Research on measurement and improvement path of industrial green development in China: A per-spective of environmental welfare efficiency. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R 2020, 27, 42738–42749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, Z.; Chen, W. Environmental Regulation, Green Innovation, and Industrial Green Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model. Sustainability 2018, 10, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, X.; He, Y.; Rao, C. Evaluation index system design and coordinated development analysis for the industrial green development system and regional non-waste system in the Yangtze River Economic Zone. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 32592–32608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, Y.; Sun, X.; Wang, B.; Liu, X. Energy saving, GHG abatement and industrial growth in OECD countries: A green productivity approach. Energy 2019, 194, 116833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dong, Y.; Jin, G.; Deng, X.; Wu, F. Multidimensional measurement of poverty and its spatio-temporal dynamics in China from the perspective of development geography. J. Geogr. Sci. 2021, 31, 130–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mennicken, L.; Janz, A.; Roth, S. The German R&D Program for CO2 Utilization—Innovations for a Green Economy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 11386–11392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wang, S.; Li, R. Toward the Coordinated Sustainable Development of Urban Water Resource Use and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis of Tianjin City, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Wang, Y. Double decoupling effectiveness of water consumption and wastewater discharge in China’s textile industry based on water footprint theory. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, X.; Li, R. Is Urban Economic Output Decoupling from Water Use in Developing Countries?—Empirical Analysis of Beijing and Shanghai, China. Water 2019, 11, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Xi, Y.; Yan, D.; Zhang, J.; Fu, X. Decoupling analysis of the industrial growth and environmental pollution in the Circum-Bohai-Sea region in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R 2021, 28, 19079–19093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hong, N.B.; Yabe, M. Improvement in irrigation water use efficiency: A strategy for climate change adaptation and sustainable development of Vietnamese tea production. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2017, 19, 1247–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zheng, J.; Zhang, H.; Xing, Z. Re-Examining Regional Total-Factor Water Efficiency and Its Determinants in China: A Parametric Distance Function Approach. Water 2018, 10, 1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Laureti, T.; Benedetti, I.; Branca, G. Water use efficiency and public goods conservation: A spatial stochastic frontier model applied to irrigation in Southern Italy. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2021, 73, 100856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, B.; Li, Y.; Hou, R.; Wang, H. Does urbanization improve industrial water consumption efficiency? Sustainability 2019, 11, 1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y. Analysis of the water use efficiency using super-efficiency data envelopment analysis. Appl. Water Sci. 2020, 10, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Y.; Yin, G.; Liu, K. Regional differences in the industrial water use efficiency of China: The spatial spillover effect and relevant factors. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 167, 105239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tone, K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2001, 130, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tone, K.; Tsutsui, M. Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega 2014, 42, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Pearce, D.W.; Markandya, A.; Barbier, E.B. Blueprint for a green economy. Environment 1989, 32. [Google Scholar]
  25. Huang, H.; Mo, R.; Chen, X. New patterns in China’s regional green development: An interval Malmquist–Luenberger productivity analysis. Struct. Change Econ. D 2021, 58, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lv, C.; Bian, B.; Lee, C.-C.; He, Z. Regional gap and the trend of green finance development in China. Energy Econ. 2021, 102, 105476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Long, R.; Liu, B.; Jiang, S.; Yang, X.; Yang, M. Evaluating green development level of mineral resource-listed companies: Based on a “dark green” assessment framework. Resour. Policy 2021, 71, 102012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hussain, Z.; Mehmood, B.; Khan, M.K.; Tsimisaraka, R.S.M. Green Growth, Green Technology, and Environmental Health: Evidence From High-GDP Countries. Front. Public Health 2022, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. GRI. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines Version 3.0; GRI: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  30. OECD. Towards Green Growth; OECD: Paris, France, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, K.; Qiao, Y.; Zhou, Q. Analysis of China’s Industrial Green Development Efficiency and Driving Factors: Research Based on MGWR. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Y.; Hu, H.; Dai, W.; Burns, K. Evaluation of industrial green development and industrial green competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 124, 107371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, W.; Xie, H.; Lu, F.; Zhang, X. Measuring the Performance of Industrial Green Development Using a Non-Radial Directional Distance Function Approach: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province in China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Estivill-Castro, V.; Lee, I. Multi-Level Clustering and its Visualization for Exploratory Spatial Analysis. GeoInformatica 2002, 6, 123–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, C.; Chen, S.; Zhao, S. Spatial correlation pattern analysis of water footprint intensity based on ESDA model at provincial scale in China. J. Nat. Resour. 2013, 28, 571–582. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cartone, A.; Casolani, N.; Liberatore, L.; Postiglione, P. Spatial analysis of grey water in Italian cereal crops production. Land Use Policy 2017, 68, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kamenetsky, M.; Chi, G.; Wang, D.; Zhu, J. Spatial Regression Analysis of Poverty in R. Spat. Demogr. 2019, 7, 113–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Maclndoe, H.; Oakley, D. Encouraging a spatial perspective in third sector studies: Exploratory spatial data analysis and spatial regression analysis. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rey, J. Space-time analysis of regional systems. Geogr. Anal. 2006, 38, 67–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J. Spatial-temporal characteristics and decoupling effects of China’s carbon footprint based on multi-source data. J. Geogr. Sci. 2021, 31, 327–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, X.-J.; Xia, S.-Y.; Yang, Y.; Wu, J.-F.; Zhou, Y.-N.; Ren, Y.-W. Spatiotemporal dynamics and impacts of socioeconomic and natural conditions on PM2.5 in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Z.; Hu, M.; Wang, Z. The space-time evolution and driving forces of county economic growth in China from 1998 to 2015. Growth Chang. 2020, 51, 1203–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Deng, G.; Li, L.; Song, Y. Provincial water use efficiency measurement and factor analysis in China: Based on SBM-DEA model. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 69, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shi, C.; Zeng, X.; Yu, Q.; Shen, J.; Li, A. Dynamic evaluation and spatiotemporal evolution of China’s industrial water use efficiency considering undesirable output. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 20839–20853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ren, Z. Evaluation Method of Port Enterprise Product Quality Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS. J. Coast. Res. 2020, 103, 766–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, P. Effects of the entropy weight on TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 2020, 168, 114186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, C.; Sun, W.; Li, P. Characteristics of spatiotemporal variations in coupling coordination between integrated carbon emission and sequestration index: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 135, 108520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiao, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, F.; Huang, H.; Wang, J. Investigation on spatial and temporal variation of coupling coordination between socioeconomic and ecological environment: A case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 136, 108667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ma, Q.; Jia, P.; Sun, C.; Kuang, H. Dynamic evolution trend of comprehensive transportation green efficiency in China: From a spatio-temporal interaction perspective. J. Geogr. Sci. 2022, 32, 477–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rey, M.; Anselin, L. Visualizing regional income distribution dynamics. Lett. Spat. Resour. Sci. 2011, 4, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, C.F.; Lin, S.J.; Lewis, C.; Chang, Y.F. Effects of carbon taxes on different industries by fuzzy goal programming: A case study of the petrochemical-related industries, Taiwan. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 4051–4058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. SCPRC. Plan on the Rise of the Central Region; SCPRC: Beijing, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The coupling coordination framework.
Figure 1. The coupling coordination framework.
Sustainability 15 00330 g001
Figure 2. The composition of the performance of the IGD system in 2009 and 2018, respectively.
Figure 2. The composition of the performance of the IGD system in 2009 and 2018, respectively.
Sustainability 15 00330 g002
Figure 3. Coupling coordination analysis in 30 provinces of China from 2009 to 2018.
Figure 3. Coupling coordination analysis in 30 provinces of China from 2009 to 2018.
Sustainability 15 00330 g003aSustainability 15 00330 g003b
Figure 4. The classification of 30 provinces based on the coupling degree and coupling coordination degree.
Figure 4. The classification of 30 provinces based on the coupling degree and coupling coordination degree.
Sustainability 15 00330 g004
Figure 5. Relative length, tortuosity, and movement direction of the LISA time path.
Figure 5. Relative length, tortuosity, and movement direction of the LISA time path.
Sustainability 15 00330 g005aSustainability 15 00330 g005b
Table 1. The index system of the IGD system.
Table 1. The index system of the IGD system.
Primary IndexesSecondary Indexes Unit
Industrial economyLabor productivity. X1 (+)%
Value-added growth rate. X2 (+)%
The total debt ratio of industrial enterprises above designated size. X3 (-)%
Total profits of industrial enterprises above designated size. X4 (+)100 million yuan
Industrial environmentIndustrial tailpipe emission. X5 (-)100 million m3
Industrial wastewater discharge. X6 (-)100 million tons
Industrial tailpipe purification. X7 (+)10 thousand m3/month
Industrial wastewater purification. X8 (+)10 thousand tons/month
The proportion of operating expenses of wastewater purification facilities in value added. X9 (+)%
The proportion of operating expenses of tailpipe purification facilities in value added. X10 (+)%
Industrial resourcesIndustrial energy consumption. X11 (-)10 thousand tons of standard coal
Industrial water use consumption. X12 (-)100 million tons
Industrial energy intensity. X13 (-)tons of standard coal/yuan
Industrial water use intensity. X14 (-)tons/yuan
Industrial innovationFull-time equivalent (FTE) of industrial R&D employees. X15 (+)——
Number of industrial R&D employees. X16 (+)——
Number of industrial valid patents. X17 (+)——
Number of new industrial products. X18 (+)——
Note: + indicates that the index is a positive index, - indicates that the index is a negative index.
Table 2. Stages of the coupling coordination degree.
Table 2. Stages of the coupling coordination degree.
Coupling Coordination DegreeStageDDescription
DysregulationHigh dysregulation(0, 0.1]Extremely maladjusted recession
(0.1, 0.2]Severe dysregulation
Basic dysregulation(0.2, 0.3]Moderate disorder recession
(0.3, 0.4]Mild dysregulation
Run-in stageRun-in stage(0.4, 0.5]On the verge of coordinated
(0.5, 0.6]Barely coordinated
Coordinated developmentBasic coordination(0.6, 0.7]Primary coordinated
(0.7, 0.8]Intermediate coordinated
High coordination(0.8, 0.9]Well-coordinated
(0.9, 1]High-quality coordinated
Table 3. Types of LISA spatial–temporal transitions.
Table 3. Types of LISA spatial–temporal transitions.
TypeTransitionImplication
IHH→HH, HL→HL, LH→LH, LL→LLUnit i and its adjacent units have no transition.
IIHH→LH, HL→LL, LH→HH, LL→HLUnit i has its own transition, but its adjacent units do not.
IIIHL→HH, HH→HL, LL→LH, LH→LLUnit i has no transition, but adjacent units have transition.
IVLL→HH, LH→HL, HL→LH, HH→LLUnit i and its adjacent units have transitions.
Table 4. The IWU efficiency of 30 provinces from 2009 to 2018.
Table 4. The IWU efficiency of 30 provinces from 2009 to 2018.
Province2009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Beijing0.3390.3160.3850.4460.4730.5610.4660.4470.4120.569
Tianjin0.2370.2630.3400.4020.4260.5110.6670.6630.5520.526
Hebei0.1590.1490.1220.1320.0900.1780.2010.2040.2480.197
Shanxi0.2440.2070.1790.2420.1940.2730.0950.1070.0990.290
Inner Mongolia0.1540.1410.1040.1040.1100.2150.1010.0860.0830.223
Liaoning0.2440.1990.1570.1270.0720.1530.1530.1650.1200.175
Jilin0.1180.0660.0190.0120.0040.1180.2190.2370.1120.121
Heilongjiang0.1400.1190.0930.1130.1450.2270.1690.1700.1610.239
Shanghai0.4140.4010.4910.5670.5250.6140.5920.5810.5920.619
Jiangsu0.4500.4050.4820.5580.5710.6670.5780.5850.4910.674
Zhejiang0.4460.4150.4700.5470.5480.6370.6300.6230.6710.655
Anhui0.2680.2200.1850.2720.2370.3380.0950.1150.2350.340
Fujian0.2320.2100.1760.2450.2830.3720.2550.2480.3730.397
Jiangxi0.1630.1750.1270.1040.0750.1770.0970.0930.1610.182
Shandong0.2520.2480.3060.4040.4120.5010.4070.4100.4760.517
Henan0.2490.2290.1950.2510.2370.3220.0710.0850.1390.339
Hubei0.2230.1810.1380.2310.2340.3140.1850.1650.2310.328
Hunan0.1430.1550.1220.1810.1540.2550.2420.2270.2720.259
Guangdong0.2750.2910.3500.4050.3920.4740.4750.4940.4700.503
Guangxi0.1490.1240.0710.0670.0060.1100.0530.0590.0860.111
Hainan0.1260.1030.0700.0720.0120.1180.0590.0720.1020.121
Chongqing0.3740.3410.3070.3680.3490.4480.4700.4720.4750.456
Sichuan0.1450.1600.1020.0940.1360.2360.2080.1900.1870.256
Guizhou0.1970.2260.1820.1160.1140.2090.1110.0970.0750.220
Yunnan0.1300.0890.0590.0560.0840.1910.3790.3970.1700.191
Shaanxi0.2040.1540.1230.1230.0970.1830.2430.2400.2140.197
Gansu0.1630.1300.0710.0730.0630.0660.0860.0890.0640.090
Qinghai0.1620.1150.0740.0840.0950.0840.0920.0920.0680.095
Ningxia0.0720.0700.0470.0440.0620.0850.0780.0780.0970.089
Xinjiang0.0710.1000.0470.0560.0790.0700.1150.1010.0570.082
Table 5. The index weights of the IGD system.
Table 5. The index weights of the IGD system.
Primary IndexesWeightSecondary IndexesWeight
Industrial economy27.23%Labor productivity. X17.30%
Value-added growth rate. X2 8.32%
The total debt ratio of industrial enterprises above designated size. X3 4.88%
Total profits of industrial enterprises above designated size. X4 6.73%
Industrial environment21.28%Industrial tailpipe emission. X5 3.83%
Industrial wastewater discharge. X6 5.32%
Industrial tailpipe purification. X7 5.11%
Industrial wastewater purification. X8 2.32%
The proportion of operating expenses of wastewater purification facilities in value added.2.50%
The proportion of operating expenses of tailpipe purification facilities in value added.2.20%
Industrial resources24.98%Industrial energy consumption. X117.33%
Industrial water use consumption. X127.21%
Industrial energy intensity. X135.55%
Industrial water use intensity. X144.89%
Industrial innovation26.51%Full-time equivalent (FTE) of industrial R&D employees. X157.14%
Number of industrial R&D employees. X168.70%
Number of industrial valid patents. X175.30%
Number of new industrial products. X185.37%
Table 6. The performance of IGD system for 30 provinces from 2009 to 2018.
Table 6. The performance of IGD system for 30 provinces from 2009 to 2018.
Province2009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Beijing0.3390.3160.3850.4460.4730.5610.4660.4470.4120.569
Tianjin0.2370.2630.3400.4020.4260.5110.6670.6630.5520.526
Hebei0.1590.1490.1220.1320.0900.1780.2010.2040.2480.197
Shanxi0.2440.2070.1790.2420.1940.2730.0950.1070.0990.290
Inner Mongolia0.1540.1410.1040.1040.1100.2150.1010.0860.0830.223
Liaoning0.2440.1990.1570.1270.0720.1530.1530.1650.1200.175
Jilin0.1180.0660.0190.0120.0040.1180.2190.2370.1120.121
Heilongjiang0.1400.1190.0930.1130.1450.2270.1690.1700.1610.239
Shanghai0.4140.4010.4910.5670.5250.6140.5920.5810.5920.619
Jiangsu0.4500.4050.4820.5580.5710.6670.5780.5850.4910.674
Zhejiang0.4460.4150.4700.5470.5480.6370.6300.6230.6710.655
Anhui0.2680.2200.1850.2720.2370.3380.0950.1150.2350.340
Fujian0.2320.2100.1760.2450.2830.3720.2550.2480.3730.397
Jiangxi0.1630.1750.1270.1040.0750.1770.0970.0930.1610.182
Shandong0.2520.2480.3060.4040.4120.5010.4070.4100.4760.517
Henan0.2490.2290.1950.2510.2370.3220.0710.0850.1390.339
Hubei0.2230.1810.1380.2310.2340.3140.1850.1650.2310.328
Hunan0.1430.1550.1220.1810.1540.2550.2420.2270.2720.259
Guangdong0.2750.2910.3500.4050.3920.4740.4750.4940.4700.503
Guangxi0.1490.1240.0710.0670.0060.1100.0530.0590.0860.111
Hainan0.1260.1030.0700.0720.0120.1180.0590.0720.1020.121
Chongqing0.3740.3410.3070.3680.3490.4480.4700.4720.4750.456
Sichuan0.1450.1600.1020.0940.1360.2360.2080.1900.1870.256
Guizhou0.1970.2260.1820.1160.1140.2090.1110.0970.0750.220
Yunnan0.1300.0890.0590.0560.0840.1910.3790.3970.1700.191
Shaanxi0.2040.1540.1230.1230.0970.1830.2430.2400.2140.197
Gansu0.1630.1300.0710.0730.0630.0660.0860.0890.0640.090
Qinghai0.1620.1150.0740.0840.0950.0840.0920.0920.0680.095
Ningxia0.0720.0700.0470.0440.0620.0850.0780.0780.0970.089
Xinjiang0.0710.1000.0470.0560.0790.0700.1150.1010.0570.082
Table 7. Spatial–temporal transition matrix of coupling coordination.
Table 7. Spatial–temporal transition matrix of coupling coordination.
2009/2018HHHLLHLLTypenSFSC
HH0.304 0.004 0.015 0.007 I2220.1440.841
HL0.007 0.093 0.007 0.026 II21
LH0.015 0.011 0.089 0.022 III18
LL0.007 0.022 0.033 0.337 IV9
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pang, Q.; Huang, H.; Zhang, L. Characteristics of Spatial–Temporal Variations in Coupling Coordination between Industrial Water Use and Industrial Green Development Systems in China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010330

AMA Style

Pang Q, Huang H, Zhang L. Characteristics of Spatial–Temporal Variations in Coupling Coordination between Industrial Water Use and Industrial Green Development Systems in China. Sustainability. 2023; 15(1):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pang, Qinghua, Hailiang Huang, and Lina Zhang. 2023. "Characteristics of Spatial–Temporal Variations in Coupling Coordination between Industrial Water Use and Industrial Green Development Systems in China" Sustainability 15, no. 1: 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop