Next Article in Journal
Landscape Pattern Changes Affect Runoff and Sediment Yield in the Nandong Underground River System in Southwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Entropy-Based Ecologic Indicators for Intrinsic Sustainability Assessment of EU27 Member States Waste Management Systems at Technosphere Level
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Rate of Enzymatic Saccharification with the Ionic Liquid Treatment of Corn Straw Activated by Metal Ion Solution

1
School of Architecture and Engineering, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China
2
Intelligent Construction Technology Application Service Center of Chongqing City Vocational College, Chongqing 402160, China
3
Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing Jianzhu College, Chongqing 400072, China
4
Institute of Life Science & Biomedical Collaborative Innovation Center of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Water Environment and Marine Biological Resources Protection, National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Ecological Treatment Technology of Urban Water Pollution, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(1), 834; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010834
Submission received: 30 November 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 3 January 2023

Abstract

:
The aim of this paper was to effectively reduce environmental pollution and further improve the enzymatic hydrolysis rate of corn straw. Thus, a pretreatment method for activating cellulose by using ionic liquid to treat metal ion solution was developed. By investigating the effects of the three factors of substrate mass fraction, reaction temperature, and reaction time, and the interaction between the factors on the pretreatment effect, the response surface design method was used to optimize the conditions of ionic liquid (1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride) treatment of corn straw after activation, and the physicochemical structure and enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency before and after treatment were compared and analyzed. The experimental results showed that the yield of reducing sugar was increased by 157.85% and 150.41%, respectively, compared with the untreated corn straw. The analysis of chemical composition and structure showed that the cellulose content of the material increased significantly by 68.11% and 60.54%, respectively, after ionic liquid treatment. The results of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation and X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed that the relative crystallinity of the material decreased after ionic liquid treatment, which was more conducive to the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose.

1. Introduction

As the world’s energy demand continues to grow, the overexploitation of fossil fuels has led to increasingly serious environmental pollution [1]. Countries around the world are committed to the development of efficient, pollution-free renewable energy. Biomass is regarded as an ideal source of alternative petrochemical resource materials because of its wide source and short regeneration cycle [2,3]. Lignocellulose is the most abundant renewable biomass resource on earth, which can be converted into energy fuels, chemicals, and materials by biological, physical, or chemical means. It has been reported that ethanol produced from cellulosic ethanol and other biomass resources has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 86%, and not only can effectively alleviate the oil crisis, but also avoids the aggravation of environmental pollution [4,5,6,7,8,9]. However, the complex structure of lignocellulose hinders its direct hydrolysis, making it difficult to achieve component separation, hydrolysis and saccharification, making the efficient utilization of lignocellulose biomass challenging [10]. Therefore, the destruction of its crystal structure is the key to improving enzymatic saccharification [11]. Traditional pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass include physical methods [12], chemical methods [13], and biological methods [14]. Various pretreatment techniques can improve the hydrolysis rate by changing the physical and chemical structure of lignocellulosic biomass [15]. However, compared with traditional cellulose solvents, ‘emerging green solvent’ ionic liquids have the advantages of easy separation, recyclability, stable properties, and environmental friendliness, and are widely used in cellulose dissolution, cellulose pretreatment, and cellulose hydrolysis [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Ionic liquids (ILs) are molten salts that consist of bulky organic cations and inorganic/organic anions. They consist of pyridinium, imidazolium cations, and OAc−, HCOO−, or Cl− anions, for example, which have the ability to dissolve cellulose [13,22].
In previous studies, Erdmenger et al. [23] studied the effect of different alkyl chain lengths of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([BMIM] Cl) on the solubility of cellulose. The results showed that the solubility obtained using [BMIM] Cl was the highest. On the other hand, FitzPatrick et al. [24] found that the ionic liquid (1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate) they proposed can dissolve cellulose efficiently, although the viscosity of the organic salt used has a key effect on the whole process. Recent studies have found that wood pulp cellulose was degraded in three phosphate-based ILs, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium dimethyl phosphate ([Emim] DMP), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethyl phosphate ([Emim]DEP) and 1-butyl-3-ethylimidazolium diethyl phosphate ([Beim] DEP). The degradation degree increased with the increase in the dissolution temperature and the accumulation of dissolution time [25]. 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMIMCl-) and EMIMCl · acetic acid (AcOH)-based deep eutectic solvents (DESs) exhibited quite different solvent capabilities for cellulose; that is, cellulose solubility was high in EMIMCl [26]. In the acetate-based IL/co-solvent systems, cellulose prefers to form a molecularly dispersed state, while in the chloride-based IL/co-solvent systems, cellulose tends to form an initial solution state of single molecular chains coexisting with aggregates [27]. Existing studies have found that a limitation of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium ([BMIM]) is its high viscosity, which slows down the dissolution of cellulose [28].
Over the past decade, imidazole ionic liquids containing chlorides have attracted great interest from researchers. Using 1-ethyl3-methylimidazolium chloride ([C2C1IM] [Cl]) as a model, Chaban et al. [29] were the first to find that highly viscous IL spontaneously and rapidly penetrated into polar carbon nanotubes (CNTs) of any diameter at 363 K and higher temperatures. Ohbad et al. [30] characterized the unique structure of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride in carbon nanotubes. Chlorine anions can migrate across the imidazole ring in a relatively ordered nano-scale framework maintained by 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium cations. Despite the high viscosity of [C2C1MIM] [Cl], [C2C1MIM] [Cl] easily penetrates into CNTs with a width of 1−3 nm at slightly higher temperatures (323–363 K) [31]. However, the method of using ionic liquid to treat metal ion solution to pretreat corn straw has not been reported. It is limited to the use of a single pretreatment method to destroy the structure and cellulose crystallinity of corn straw. Therefore, the combination of various treatment methods can better improve the utilization rate of corn straw and reduce production costs, which has high research value.
In this study, corn straw was used as raw material, and the straw raw material was activated by ion solution pretreatment of metal ion solution. The optimum activation conditions of metal ion solution treated by ionic liquid were determined by response surface experimental design, and the chemical composition, crystallinity, and structure of corn straw before and after treatment under the optimum conditions were analyzed. The research results can provide technical references and theoretical support for the utilization of biomass.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

The raw material of corn straw was collected from Zhongliangshan District of Chongqing City, which was dried naturally. After being crushed with a hammer mill, it was screened using a standard sieve. The corn straw material with a particle size of 60 mesh was dried at 105 °C. Cellulase was purchased from Ningxia Heshibi Biotechnology Co., Ltd., (Ningxia, China), ionic liquid [BMIM]Cl was purchased from Moni Chemical Technology (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China), and ferric chloride solution and aluminum chloride solution were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Metal Ion Solution Pretreatment Experiment

As a uniform experimental design method for pretreatment of corn straw with ferric chloride and aluminum chloride solution, 60.00 g corn straw raw material screened with a standard sieve was pretreated according to the experimental design conditions, the treated material was collected, washed five times with deionized water, and then dried at 105 °C for later use.

2.3. Ionic Liquid Treatment Experiment

Pretreated materials were treated using the ionic liquid method. The substrate mass fraction of 2~6%, reaction temperature of 80~120 °C, and reaction time of 2~6 h were selected as the three factors of the response surface optimization experiment of enzymatic hydrolysis. According to the response, as part of the surface experimental design method, cellulase hydrolysis experiments were carried out on the extracted cellulose materials, as shown in Table 1.

2.4. Analysis Method

The filter paper activity of cellulase was determined to be 60 FPU/g according to the enzyme activity method [32]. The reducing sugar concentration in the enzymatic hydrolysate of corn straw was determined via 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid colorimetry [33]; the component content of corn straw material was determined using the Van Soest method [34].

2.5. Structural and Morphological Analysis

XRD (Malvern Panaco intelligent X-ray diffractometer Empyrean), SEM (low vacuum tungsten lamp scanning electron microscope SEM3200), and FTIR (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy imaging system PerkinElmer) were used to observe and analyze the structure, morphology, and bond changes of intermolecular and intramolecular bonds in corn straw raw materials and metal-ion-solution-treated materials. XRD scanning range: 10~50, acceleration voltage: 40 kV, current: 150 mA, step length: 0.02/2θ, scanning speed: 4/min, SEM acceleration voltage: 10 kV, FTIR scanning range: 400 cm1~4000 cm1.

2.6. Statistical Analysis Methods

The data obtained in the experiment were analyzed and processed using Origin 8.0 software processing system and Windows Excel and Word (2003, 2010 editions) Office software. All determinations were carried out in triplicate and the mean values were presented, and the data are reported as the averages of three separate experiments ± SD (n = 3).

3. Results

3.1. Optimization Experiment Results of Response Surface Method

In this study, reducing sugar yield as the response value, according to the response surface design of experimental enzymatic hydrolysis experiments, the results are shown in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4.
In the Design-Expert. 12.0 software, X1 (substrate mass fraction), X2 (reaction temperature), and X3 (reaction time) were taken as independent variables, and enzymatic hydrolysis reducing sugar yield Y as the response value. The multivariate quadratic regression Equations (1) and (2) were obtained as follows:
Y = 700.88 + 36.15 X 1 + 18.22 X 2 + 14.07 X 3 36.57 X 1 X 1 21.44 X 2 X 2 23.25 X 3 X 3 8.40 X 1 X 2 8.77 X 1 X 3 10.68 X 2 X 3
  Y = 679.66 + 33.34 X 1 + 17.16 X 2 + 16.37 X 3 33.58 X 1 X 1 25.07 X 2 X 2 27.37 X 3 X 3 9.03 X 1 X 2 5.99 X 1 X 3 7.50 X 2 X 3
The first column number of reducing sugar yield in Table 2 is ferric chloride solution response surface experimental data, the second column number is aluminum chloride solution response surface experimental data. The results of Table 4 show that the F values were 64.13, 9.65, and p (<0.05), indicating that the model was highly significant; among them, X1 and X2 were extremely significant, while X3 was significant; the interaction items X1X2, X1X3, and X2X3 were significant.
Figure 1 and Figure 2 are the response curves of reducing sugar after ferric chloride activation and aluminum chloride activation by ionic liquid treatment, respectively. It can be seen from the a in Figure 1 and Figure 2 that with the increase in reaction temperature, the enzymatic hydrolysis reducing sugar rate tends to be stable, and when the temperature is higher than 80 °C and 100 °C, the enzymatic hydrolysis rate has a downward trend; when the substrate mass fraction is higher than 2%, the enzymatic hydrolysis rate will increase with the increase of the substrate mass fraction. When the substrate mass fraction is greater than 4%, the enzymatic hydrolysis rate will no longer continue to increase. Therefore, the reaction temperature and mass fraction should be controlled at 60–80 °C, 80–100 °C, respectively, and 4–6%, 2–4%, respectively, and the enzymatic hydrolysis rate can reach the maximum value. It can be seen from b in Figure 1 and Figure 2 that the enzymatic hydrolysis rate of corn straw increased with the increase in reaction time and reached the maximum when the reaction time was 4 h and near 4 h. After that, it did not increase any further. When the substrate mass fraction is around 4%, the enzymatic hydrolysis rate reaches the maximum. Therefore, the reaction time and the substrate mass fraction are controlled at 4–6%, 2–4%, respectively, and 2–4 h, 2–4 h, respectively. The enzymatic hydrolysis rate can reach its maximum. It can be seen from c in Figure 1 and Figure 2 that the reaction time and temperature required to reach the maximum value of cellulase hydrolysis should be between 2–4 h, 2–4 h, respectively, and 60–80 °C, 80–100 °C, respectively. In summary, the optimal conditions are as follows: when the mass fraction of substrate is 4.2% and 3.6%, the reaction temperatures are 85 °C and 105 °C, respectively. The reaction times are 185 min and 230 min, respectively. The maximum theoretical value of reducing sugar yield (Y) is 712.66 mg/g and 690.85 mg/g, respectively. To test the accuracy of the model, the verification test was carried out under this condition, and the yield of reducing sugar after enzymatic hydrolysis was 706.52 mg/g, 686.13 mg/g, respectively, which was close to the model prediction results, indicating that the model was effective. At the same time, compared with untreated raw materials, the yield of reduced sugar increased by 157.85% and 150.41%, respectively.

3.2. Analysis of Components

Corn straw raw materials and ionic liquid treatment chemical composition of metal-ion-activated corn straw materials before and after treatment are shown in Table 5. The results of Table 5 showed that the content of cellulose increased by 68.11% and 60.54%, respectively, hemicellulose decreased by 17.99% and 16.93%, respectively, and soluble substances decreased by 56.00% and 53.71%, respectively, when the corn straw activated by ferric chloride solution and aluminum chloride solution was treated with ionic liquids.

3.3. Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis

Figure 3 is the FTIR diffraction pattern of corn straw before treatment with two metal ion solutions, and Figure 4 is the FTIR diffraction pattern after treatment. It can be seen from Figure 3 that the cellulose spectrum of corn straws treated in different ways is still roughly the same. In this study, we mainly judged whether the cellulose had been derivatized after ionic liquid treatment by infrared spectroscopy and judged the crystal structure of cellulose based on the change of characteristic absorption peaks. From the diagram, it can be seen that the absorption peak intensity of cellulose before and after treatment has changed greatly, but the position of each peak remains unchanged, which indicates that cellulose does not undergo a derivatization reaction in the process of dissolution and regeneration; that is, the dissolution of cellulose by ionic liquid is a direct dissolution process. At the same time, after treatment with ionic liquid, the hydroxyl absorption peak of cellulose is significantly weakened, indicating that cellulose changes from type I to type II structure.

3.4. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

From Figure 5, it can be seen that the diffraction characteristic peaks of the material diffraction pattern change greatly after the corn straw raw material is activated by the ionic liquid, indicating that the [BMIM] Cl treatment destroys the crystal structure of the straw material, thus changing its crystal structure. Referring to the empirical algorithm of Segal et al. [35], the crystallinity of corn straw raw material was calculated to be 88.36°. The crystallinity of ionic-liquid-treated ferric chloride solution and aluminum chloride solution was 38.36° and 49.31°, respectively.

3.5. Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis

The appearance of corn straw changed significantly before and after pretreatment, as shown in Figure 6. Before pretreatment, the surface structure of corn straw raw material was smooth, and the cellulose was uniform, smooth, and orderly. However, after the activation of metal ion solution treated by the ionic liquid, the structure of corn straw raw material changed noticeably. After the activation of two metal ion solutions treated with ionic liquid, the surface structure of corn straw raw material became loose, and obvious holes, pits, and cracks appeared.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of Response Surface on Enzymatic Hydrolysis Results

According to the results of cellulase hydrolysis experiments, the yield of reducing sugar was greatly improved compared with the raw materials. The reaction temperature and the mass fraction of the substrate were the decisive factors, followed by the reaction time. When the reaction temperature of ionic liquid was too low, cellulose could not be fully dissolved, and the crystallinity of cellulose decreased little, so the enzymatic hydrolysis rate was low. However, when the reaction temperature of ionic liquid exceeds a certain value, the crystallinity of cellulose will no longer decrease, remaining in a stable state with an optimum condition. It was also found that the yield of reducing sugar via cellulase hydrolysis after activation with ferric chloride solution was higher than that of the other. The reason was that after the corn straw raw material was treated with ferric chloride solution, the adhesive layer structure of the material was destroyed more than that of the other, which was more conducive to the penetration and dissolution of ionic liquids. The crystal structure of cellulose was destroyed significantly, so its enzymatic hydrolysis value was higher. After the corn straw was treated with ferric chloride solution, the structure of the bonding layer was more easily destroyed. The reason is that in the process of metal ion pretreatment, the structure of corn straw is destroyed by hemicellulose under the action of metal ions, and the surface and internal structure became loose, which is conducive to the infiltration of ionic liquids into the interior of straw molecules, disrupting the intermolecular and intramolecular bond energy, so that cellulose is more exposed. Due to the role of metal ions, similar to that of Lewis acid, it can play the role of acid hydrolysis, so that hemicellulose is easy to hydrolyze, resulting in a decrease in its content. It can be seen from the results that the content of cellulose activated by ferric chloride treated with ionic liquid increased the most. Therefore, the surface and internal structure of corn straw treated with ionic liquid were looser, and the content of hemicellulose decreased, resulting in the structure of the bonding layer being more easily destroyed.

4.2. Effect of Ionic Liquids on Components

Compared with the raw material, the content of hemicellulose and soluble substances decreased, and the content of cellulose increased. The main reason was that under the activation of metal-ion solution, the adhesive layer composed of hemicellulose and lignin became loose and the structure was seriously damaged, so that hemicellulose was easily decomposed. At the same time, due to the destruction of corn straw cell structure, many of the intracellular substances were released in greater quantities [36]. The results showed that the raw materials activated by metal ions and then treated with ionic liquids could increase the content of cellulose, so that more hemicellulose could be decomposed. The decomposed hemicellulose could also be used in medicine, chemical industry, and other fields [37], which was conducive to the comprehensive utilization of corn straw. It can also be seen from the results that the content of cellulose activated by metal ions in ionic liquid treatment increased to varying degrees, among which the content of cellulose increased the most after the activation of ferric chloride solution, and the yield of reducing sugar by enzymatic hydrolysis was much higher than that of raw materials. The yield of reducing sugar by enzymatic hydrolysis after activation of aluminum chloride solution was lower than that of ferric chloride solution due to the difference in cellulose content, but still higher than that of untreated raw materials.

4.3. Effect of Ionic Liquids on Crystallinity

The crystalline structure of cellulose in corn straw is one of the key factors affecting the yield of cellulase. After the activation of metal ion solution and the treatment of ionic liquid, the crystal structure of cellulose was destroyed to varying degrees, and the crystallinity decreased. The crystal structure of cellulose was the most destroyed after the activation of ferric chloride solution and the treatment of ionic liquid, so the crystallinity of cellulose was the lowest, which was also consistent with the previous enzymatic hydrolysis results and chemical composition results.

4.4. Effect of Ionic Liquid on Morphology

From the results of scanning electron microscopy, it can be seen that the surface structure of the material became rough and uneven after the activation of the metal ion solution and the treatment of the ionic liquid. After the treatment of metal-ion solution, the surface structure of corn straw became fluffy, and a large number of holes appeared. After the treatment of ionic liquid, the hydrogen bonds between and within the cellulose molecules were destroyed, making it looser, which was conducive to the contact of cellulase. The results of SEM observation further verified the results of XRD analysis, indicating that the dense structure and crystallinity of corn straw raw materials were the key factors restricting the increase in the reduced sugar yield of corn straw.

5. Conclusions

(1)
Response surface methodology was used to optimize the enzymatic hydrolysis conditions of corn straw after metal ion activation by ionic liquid treatment. The optimization results are as follows: ionic liquid treatment of ferric chloride solution activation, substrate mass fraction of 4.2%, reaction temperature of 85 °C, reaction time of 185 min. The aluminum chloride solution was activated by ionic liquid treatment. The substrate mass fraction was 3.6%, the reaction temperature was 105 °C, and the reaction time was 230 min. Through the experiment of enzymatic hydrolysis, it was found that the enzymatic hydrolysis value of the material activated by ionic liquid treatment of ferric chloride solution was the largest, reaching 706.52 mg/g.
(2)
The results of component analysis showed that the cellulose content of corn straw was significantly increased after the activation of metal ions by ionic liquid treatment, and the yield of reducing sugar after cellulase hydrolysis was increased.
(3)
FTIR analysis showed that ionic liquids could dissolve more cellulose, so the hydrogen bonds of cellulose weakened and the spatial structure changed. The XRD results showed that the relative crystallinity of corn straw material was reduced to a certain extent compared with the raw material after the activation of metal ion solution by ionic liquid. The SEM results showed that the treated material became fluffy, the surface was uneven, and more holes appeared, which was more conducive to the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulase.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.Z. and X.F.; methodology, D.L.; software, F.W.; validation, Q.W., J.W. and P.G.; formal analysis, D.L., P.G. and Y.L.; investigation, G.Z. and X.F.; resources, G.Z.; data curation, L.J. and F.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.F.; writing—review and editing, C.Y.; visualization, D.S.; supervision, Y.H.; project administration, C.Y.; funding acquisition, D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China: (52103156, 51901160); Chongqing Science and Technology Commission Project: (cstc2021jcyjmsxmX0663); Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China: (cstc2022NSCQ-MSX1145, cstc2021jcyjmsxmX0901, cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0559, CSTB2022BSXM-JCX0149); the Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission: (KJQN202001530, KJQN202103905, KJQN202101526, KJQN202103902); Chongqing Bayu Scholars Young Scholars Project: (YS2021089); College Students Innovation Training Program: (2021198, 202211551007); the Open Fund of Chongqing Key Laboratory of Energy Engineering Mechanics & Disaster Prevention and Mitigation (No. EEMDPM2021204); Postgraduate Innovation Program of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (YKJCX2220603).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luo, H.; Zheng, P.; Bilal, M.; Xie, F.; Zeng, Q.; Zhu, C.; Yang, R.; Wang, Z. Efficient Bio-Butanol Production from Lignocellulosic Waste by Elucidating the Mechanisms of Clostridium Acetobutylicum Response to Phenolic Inhibitors. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 710, 136399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Han, X.; Guo, Y.; Liu, X.; Xia, Q.; Wang, Y. Catalytic Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass into Hydrocarbons: A Mini Review. Catal. Today 2019, 319, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiang, Z.; Zhao, P.; Hu, C. Controlling the Cleavage of the Inter- and Intra-Molecular Linkages in Lignoc-ellulosic Biomass for Further Biorefining: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 256, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pan, Q.; Shi, P.; Xu, W.; Li, X.; Shi, J. Research Progress on Preparation of Xylose Oligosaccharide from Corn Stalk. China For. Prod. Ind. 2020, 57, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Shang, J. Study on Preparation and Properties of Sound Absorbing and Heat Insulating Corn Straw Pith Board. China For. Prod. Ind. 2019, 46, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, X.; Zuo, Y. Research Status of Resource Utilization for Rice and Wheat Straw. China For. Prod. Ind. 2021, 58, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Z.; Xie, M.; Zhao, H.; Ma, L.; Xiao, J. Research Status on Liquid-Phase Catalytic Depolymerization of Lignin. China For. Prod. Ind. 2020, 57, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheng, J.; Xu, W.; Shi, J.; Li, X.; Hong, Y. Study on the Synthesis Process of Soybean Protein Adhesive Modified by Bioethanol Lignin-Pae. China For. Prod. Ind. 2021, 58, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, M.; Wu, M.; Huo, H. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gasemission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types. Environ. Res. Lett. 2007, 2, 024001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pang, B.; Sun, Z.H.; Wang, L.; Chen, W.J.; Sun, Q.; Cao, X.F.; Shen, X.J.; Xiao, L.; Yan, J.L.; Deuss, P.J.; et al. Improved value and carbon footprint by complete utilization of corncob lignocellulose. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 419, 129565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liang, C.; Feng, Q.; Lu, S.; Wang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, W.; Qi, W. Synergistic Enhancement Effect of Compound Additive of Organic Alcohols and Biosurfactant on Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulose. Fermentation 2022, 8, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sankaran, R.; Parra-Cruz, R.A.; Pakalapati, H.; Show, P.L.; Ling, T.C.; Chen, W.-H.; Tao, Y. Recent advances in the pretreat-ment of microalgal and lignocellulosic biomass: A comprehensive review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 298, 122476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Uju; Goto, M.; Kamiya, N. Powerful peracetic acid–ionic liquid pretreatment process for the efficient chemical hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 214, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, S.Q.; Li, F.; Wu, D.; Zhang, P.Y.; Wang, H.J.; Tao, X.; Ye, J.P.; Nabi, M. Enzyme pretreatment enhancing biogas yield from corn stover: Feasibility, optimization, and mechanism analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 10026–10032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, X.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X.Y.; Tao, Y.; Boczkaj, G.; Yoon, J.Y.; Xuan, X.X. Recent advances in hydrodynamic cavitation-based pretreatments of lignocellulosic biomass for valorization. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 214, 126251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, B.; Zhang, P. Progress of Ionic Liquids-Green Preparation and Application Research in Environmental Remediation. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 3176–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Liu, X.; Guo, W. Preparation Carbon Fibers from Cellulose by Ionic Liquid Method. J. Funct. Mater. 2019, 50, 7172–7175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Polaskova, M.; Cermak, R.; Verney, V.; Ponizil, P.; Commereuc, S.; Gomes, M.F.C.; Padua, A.A.; Mokrejs, P.; Machovsky, M. Preparation of Microfibers from Wood/Ionic Liquid Solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xiao, W.; Yin, W.; Xia, S.; Ma, P. The Study of Factors Affecting the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose after Ionic Liquid Pretreatment. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 2019–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Iguchi, M.; Aida, T.M.; Watanabe, M.; Smith, R.L. Dissolution and Recovery of Cellulose from 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Chloride in Presence of Water. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, F.; Chen, Y.; You, T.; Mao, J.; Zhang, X. Research Progress on Mechanism of Cellulose Dissolution. J. For. Eng. 2019, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ziembowicz, F.I.; Mattiazzi, L.M.; Bender, C.R.; Frizzo, C.P.; da Rosa, M.B.; Reichert, J.M.; Kloster, C.L.; Villetti, M.A. Thermodynamics of aggregation and modulation of Rheo-Thermal properties of hydroxypropyl cellulose by imidazolium ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 359, 119314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Erdmenger, T.; Haensch, C.; Hoogenboom, R.; Schubert, U.S. Homogeneous tritylation of cellulose in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Macromol. Biosci. 2007, 7, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. FitzPatrick, M.; Champagne, P.; Cunningham, M.F. The effect of subcritical carbon dioxide on the dissolu-tion of cellulose in the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate. Cellulose 2012, 19, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wei, J.; Gao, H.; Li, Y.; Nie, Y. Research on the degradation behaviors of wood pulp cellulose in ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 365, 119071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, H.; Ionita, A.; Seriñan, P.F.; Ferrer, M.L.; Rodríguez, M.A.; Tamayo, A.; Alons, F.R.; Monte, F.D.; Gutiérrez, M.C. Easy and Efficient Recovery of EMIMCl from Cellulose Solutions by Addition of Acetic Acid and the Transition from the Original Ionic Liquid to an Eutectic Mixture. Molecules 2022, 27, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yin, D.; Zhang, J.; Mi, Q.; Lu, H.; Liang, D.; Zhang, J. The solution state and dissolution process of cellulose in ionic-liquid-based solvents with different hydrogen-bonding basicity and microstructures. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 3824–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Taokaew, S.; Kriangkrai, W. Recent Progress in Processing Cellulose Using Ionic Liquids as Solvents. Polysaccharides 2022, 3, 671–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chaban, V.V.; Prezhdo, O.V. Nanoscale Carbon Greatly Enhances Mobility of a Highly Viscous Ionic Liquid. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8190–8197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ohba, T.; Hata, K.; Chaban, V.V. Nanocrystallization of Imidazolium Ionic Liquid in Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 28424–28429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ohba, T.; Chaban, V.V. A Highly Viscous Imidazolium Ionic Liquid inside Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 6234–6240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xie, J.; Cheng, Z.; Zhu, S.; Xu, J. Lewis Base Enhanced Neutral Deep Eutectic Solvent Pretreatment for Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Straw and Lignin Characterization. Renew. Energy 2022, 188, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ghose, T.K. Measurement of Cellulase Activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adekunle, A.E.; Rabeya, T.; Jehadin, F.; Asad, M.A.; Ayodele, O.O.; Islam, M.S. Compositional and Micr-ostructural Changes in Compressed Hot Water Pretreated Corn Stalk. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Segal, L.; Creely, J.J.; Martin, A.E.; Conrad, C.M. An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer. Text. Res. J. 1959, 29, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, C.G.; Wyman, C.E. Partial Flow of Compressed-Hot Water through Corn Stover to Enhance Hemicellulose Sugar Recovery and Enzymatic Digestibility of Cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 1978–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wyman, C.E.; Dale, B.E.; Elander, R.T.; Holtzapple, M.; Ladisch, M.R.; Lee, Y.Y. Comparative Sugar Recovery Data from Laboratory Scale Application of Leading Pretreatment Technologies to Corn Stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 2026–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Response surface and contour plots of the effect of iron trichloride treatment on reduced glucose yield. (a) Y and X2, X1 surface map; (b) Y and X3, X1 surface map; (c) Y and X3, X2 surface map.
Figure 1. Response surface and contour plots of the effect of iron trichloride treatment on reduced glucose yield. (a) Y and X2, X1 surface map; (b) Y and X3, X1 surface map; (c) Y and X3, X2 surface map.
Sustainability 15 00834 g001
Figure 2. Response surface and contour plot of the effect of aluminum trichloride treatment on reduced sugar yield. (a) Y and X2, X1 surface map; (b) Y and X3, X1 surface map; (c) Y and X3, X2 surface map.
Figure 2. Response surface and contour plot of the effect of aluminum trichloride treatment on reduced sugar yield. (a) Y and X2, X1 surface map; (b) Y and X3, X1 surface map; (c) Y and X3, X2 surface map.
Sustainability 15 00834 g002
Figure 3. FTIR diffraction patterns of corn straw before treatment with two metal ion solutions. (a) Original; (b) ferric chloride activation; (c) aluminum chloride activation.
Figure 3. FTIR diffraction patterns of corn straw before treatment with two metal ion solutions. (a) Original; (b) ferric chloride activation; (c) aluminum chloride activation.
Sustainability 15 00834 g003
Figure 4. FTIR diffraction spectrum of corn straw of two metal ion solutions activation (a) original; (b) ferric chloride activation; (c) aluminum chloride activation.
Figure 4. FTIR diffraction spectrum of corn straw of two metal ion solutions activation (a) original; (b) ferric chloride activation; (c) aluminum chloride activation.
Sustainability 15 00834 g004
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction spectrum of corn straw of two metal ion solutions activation and original. (a) Original; (b) ferric chloride activation; (c) aluminum chloride activation.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction spectrum of corn straw of two metal ion solutions activation and original. (a) Original; (b) ferric chloride activation; (c) aluminum chloride activation.
Sustainability 15 00834 g005
Figure 6. SEM patterns of corn straw of two metal ion solutions activation and original. (a) Original; (b) ferric chloride activation (substrate mass fraction, reaction temperature and reaction time were 4.2%, 85 °C, 185 min, respectively); (c) aluminum chloride activation (substrate mass fraction, reaction temperature, and reaction time were 3.6%, 105 °C, 230 min, respectively).
Figure 6. SEM patterns of corn straw of two metal ion solutions activation and original. (a) Original; (b) ferric chloride activation (substrate mass fraction, reaction temperature and reaction time were 4.2%, 85 °C, 185 min, respectively); (c) aluminum chloride activation (substrate mass fraction, reaction temperature, and reaction time were 3.6%, 105 °C, 230 min, respectively).
Sustainability 15 00834 g006
Table 1. Response surface experimental design factor level.
Table 1. Response surface experimental design factor level.
FactorLevel
−101
X1 Substrate mass fraction (%)246
X2 Reaction temperature (°C)80100120
X3 Reaction time (h)246
Table 2. Solution response surface experimental design and results.
Table 2. Solution response surface experimental design and results.
Test NumberFactorReducing Sugar Yield (mg·g−1)
X1X2X3
1−110623.76 a, 603.57 b
2000700.67, 679.74
3−1−10583.45, 574.12
4011691.23, 669.82
51−10678.76, 656.52
6110685.48, 649.83
7−10−1592.13, 566.92
80−11663.21, 627.56
9000701.52, 678.12
10−101623.87, 601.48
11000700.45, 681.25
12101672.43, 658.53
1301−1670.52, 641.79
140−1−1599.78, 569.44
1510−1675.78, 647.52
Note: a Ferric chloride solution. b Aluminum trichloride solution.
Table 3. Significance test of each coefficient of the developed quadratic regression model.
Table 3. Significance test of each coefficient of the developed quadratic regression model.
ItemCoefficientStandard ErrortP
constant2334.81 a, 679.703 b2592.76 a, 9.221 b16.19 a, 73.713 b0.0034 a, 0.0013 b
X11457.47, 33.2891457.47, 5.64765.31, 5.8950.0005, 0.0021
X22656.84, 17.1712656.84, 5.64716.59, 3.0410.0096, 0.0032
X31582.88, 16.4651582.88, 5.6479.88, 2.9160.0256, 0.0294
X1 X1−44.98, −33.6173.286, 8.312−13.688, −4.0450.0001, 0.0102
X2 X2−17.74, −25.0773.286, 8.312−5.398, −3.0170.0017, 0.0211
X3 X3−23.71, −27.4743.286, 8.312−7.217, −3.3050.0004, 0.0303
X1 X2−8.32, −9.0353.157, 7.986−2.635, −1.1310.0388, 0. 0395
X1 X3−10.42, −5.8883.157, 7.986−3.300, −0.7370.0164, 0.0441
X2 X3−9.73, −7.5223.157, 7.986−3.081, −0.9420.0216, 0.0492
Note: a Ferric chloride solution. b Aluminum trichloride solution.
Table 4. Variance analysis of regression equation.
Table 4. Variance analysis of regression equation.
Source of VarianceDegree of FreedomSum of SquaresCorrects the Sum of SquaresCorrect VarianceFP
Regression923,009.2 a, 22,159.3 b23,009.2 a, 22,159.3 b2556.58 a, 2462.14 b 64.13 a, 9.65 b 0.001 a, 0.011 b
Linear312,312.1, 13,392.712,312.1, 13,392.74104.02, 4464.24102.95, 17.50 0.001, 0.004
Square39607.8, 8075.09607.8, 8075.03202.61, 2691.6880.34, 10.550.001, 0.013
Interaction31089.3, 691.51089.3, 691.5363.11, 230.519.11, 0.900.018, 0.501
Residual Error5199.3, 1275.4199.3, 1275.439.86, 255.08
Missing Fit3197.5, 1270.5197.5, 1270.565.84, 423.5072.5, 172.840.014, 0.006
Pure Error21.8, 4.91.8, 4.90.91, 2.45
Total1423208.5, 23434.7
Note: a Ferric chloride solution. b Aluminum trichloride solution.
Table 5. Composition of raw corn straw samples treated by mental ion and ionic liquids (g).
Table 5. Composition of raw corn straw samples treated by mental ion and ionic liquids (g).
Corn StrawCelluloseHemicelluloseLigninSoluble MaterialAsh
Not Processed0.6000.1850.1890.0460.1750.004
Iron Trichloride Solution +
Ionic Liquid Treatment
0.6000.3110.1550.0450.0770.010
Aluminum Trichloride Solution +
Ionic Liquid Treatment
0.6000.2970.1570.0520.0810.011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, G.; Fan, X.; Wang, F.; Luo, Y.; Liang, D.; Han, Y.; Gao, P.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Yu, C.; et al. Enhanced Rate of Enzymatic Saccharification with the Ionic Liquid Treatment of Corn Straw Activated by Metal Ion Solution. Sustainability 2023, 15, 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010834

AMA Style

Zeng G, Fan X, Wang F, Luo Y, Liang D, Han Y, Gao P, Wang Q, Wang J, Yu C, et al. Enhanced Rate of Enzymatic Saccharification with the Ionic Liquid Treatment of Corn Straw Activated by Metal Ion Solution. Sustainability. 2023; 15(1):834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010834

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Guoming, Xuanhao Fan, Fei Wang, Yang Luo, Dong Liang, Yongguang Han, Pei Gao, Quanfeng Wang, Jiale Wang, Chunyi Yu, and et al. 2023. "Enhanced Rate of Enzymatic Saccharification with the Ionic Liquid Treatment of Corn Straw Activated by Metal Ion Solution" Sustainability 15, no. 1: 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010834

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop