Next Article in Journal
Decentralized Power Flow Control Strategy Using Transition Operations of DC-Bus Voltage for Detection of Uncertain DC Microgrid Operations
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Electroosmotic Permeability Using Different Models and Investigation of Its Effect on Chromium Removal
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Natural Disasters and Pest Infestations on Technical Efficiency in Rice Production: A Study in Vietnam
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioremediation of Heavy Metals from Industrial Effluents Using Bacillus pakistanensis and Lysinibacillus composti
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biosorption Potential of Desmodesmus sp. for the Sequestration of Cadmium and Lead from Contaminated Water

1
Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
3
Department of Botany, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda 24420, Pakistan
4
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
5
Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(15), 11634; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511634
Submission received: 17 June 2023 / Revised: 16 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Management and Remediation of Contaminated Sites)

Abstract

:
Industrialization, urbanization, and natural processes have potentially accelerated the pace and level of heavy metals in the aquatic environment. Recently, modern strategies for heavy metal treatment in wastewater have received the specific attention of the scientific community. The present study aimed to assess the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. as a low-cost adsorbent to remove the cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) from aqueous solutions. It involved the optimization of pH, contact time, initial concentration of metal ions, and the dosage of biosorbent. Data collation revealed that an optimum contact time for both metals was 60 min, with an adsorption capacity of 63% for Cd and 66% for Pb. Different models were applied to the equilibrium data. The pseudo 2nd order described the best adsorption of Cd and Pb. The equilibrium data were computed with various isotherms. Langmuir isotherms better suit the adsorption of the above-mentioned metals. Hence, the maximum adsorption capacity of Desmodesmus sp. for Cd and Pb was 64.1 and 62.5 mg/g, respectively. The mechanism of biosorption was validated through a comparative FT-IR and Scanning Electron Microscopy of raw and metal-loaded algal biomass based on cell morphological changes. In order to study the reusability of adsorbent, adsorption-desorption of Cd and Pb ions was repeated three times using HCl. These results did not noticeably change in adsorption capacity during the three cycles. Using HCl (0.1 M), desorption of both metals was achieved up to 90% in three cycles. This work presented a long-term bioremediation approach for heavy metal pollutants in wastewater. This research could be seen as an interdisciplinary approach to large-scale heavy metal remediation. In addition, growing microalgae in wastewater produces animal feed and biodiesel. When compared to other conventional methods for environmental remediation and the manufacture of valuable products, the use of microalgae is a more efficient and cost-effective method.

1. Introduction

Toxic (heavy) metals constitute the most hazardous moieties found persistently in the environment [1]. Heavy metals are the contaminants that impact humans and animals [2,3]. Heavy metals that are toxic to the surroundings include cadmium and lead [4]. Despite this, Cd has been excessively used in pesticides, fertilizers, plastics, mining, welding, and refining [5]. Similarly, lead is used in batteries, cables, steel, paint, and plastic industries [6,7]. Discharge of waste from these production units causes heavy metal contamination in the aquatic system. Prolonged exposure to Cd can cause hepatic injury, hypertension, lung damage, renal dysfunction, and teratogenic consequences in humans [8,9]. Likewise, the effects of lead exposure may damage the brain, kidneys, and liver, in addition to developing ancillary issues, such as loss of appetite, gastrointestinal, anemia, and mental defects in children [10,11,12,13,14]. Due to being non-degradable and accumulative, heavy metals persist in the food chain with biological consequences, as already mentioned [15].
To avoid adverse impacts of heavy metals, it is imperative to purify wastewater before it is discharged into the surroundings [16,17]. Heavy metals can be eliminated from wastewater through a variety of processes. These may include ion exchange, coupled processes of oxidation/reduction, lime precipitation, membrane technology, electrochemical treatment, filtration, and reverse osmosis [16,18]. There are some limitations of these methods, such as not being more efficient at low metal concentrations and producing toxic sludge [19,20]. Therefore, new techniques are needed that eliminate the heavy metals from the ecosystem, ideally in an economical and environmentally friendly way [21]. Biosorption, as an alternative, provides the advantage of safe and efficient means of heavy metal removal from aquatic bodies, including wastewater, either in catchment areas or in ponds [22]. Consequently, this research is focused on finding effective and economically viable biosorbents to deal with these persistent heavy metals for biosafe ecosystem.
The process of biosorption is complex and is affected by the type of microbes, either in the living or amorphous form [23]. Since 2009, algae and cyanobacteria have been recognized as a preferred means to eliminate metal pollutants [24,25]. Algae, bacteria, fungi, and yeast all exhibit the uptake capacity of metal ions either by bioaccumulation or biosorption [26,27]. The application of amorphous biomass as an adsorbent has been promising in removing or recovering pollutants from aquatic environments [28]. Besides accumulating pollutants, algae are a broad category of organisms in aquatic environments that contain chlorophyll and prepare their food, thus boosting the water quality [29,30,31]. Algae as a biosorbent are efficient even at low levels of metal ion concentration [32], thus offsetting disadvantages associated with commercial resins at lower metal concentrations [33].
Different processes, such as coordination, electrostatic attraction, complexation, and microprecipitation, participate in the binding mechanism of heavy metal in the process of adsorption. At the same time, ion exchange has significantly influenced the binding of adsorbates to biosorbents [34]. Therefore, algal biomass is a reliable system for eliminating heavy metals offering dual capacity for biosorption and bioaccumulation. Biosorption is a passive phenomenon that essentially involves the chemical interaction of adsorbate and adsorbent [35], while bioaccumulation is an active process that occurs when there is intracellular incorporation of metal ions [36,37].
No research work has been done on the adsorption of cadmium and lead on Desmodesmus sp. collected from Poonch AJK. Desmodesmus sp. has good characteristics and is not toxic to the ecosystem. Cadmium and lead were used in this study because both metals have been discussed in the literature due to their high potential risk to human health and the environment. Hence, as a novelty, Desmodesmus sp. was used for the first time as a sorbent for the removal of heavy metals from an aqueous solution. The present study aimed to assess the capacity of the amorphous state biomass of Desmodesmus sp. as a sorbent of cadmium and lead. The experimental validations, including optimization of medium pH, contact time, the initial concentration of cadmium and lead ions, and adsorbent dose on the efficiency of adsorption of metals from mixed solutions and desorption of loaded (metal) biosorbents, were also investigated. The adsorption mechanism was evaluated through adsorption kinetics and isotherms, and finally, the evidence was assessed through FT-IR analysis and SEM.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Sorbent

Planktonic algal samples were collected from a freshwater stream in Hajira Poonch Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK). The adsorbent preparation was described following the procedure with slight modifications [38]. The sample was streaked on agar plates with BBM with 1.5% agar and incubated at 25 °C under constant illumination at a light intensity using 1500 lux white LED light for 15 days. Upon emergence, colonies were picked and reinoculated in agar plates to obtain axenic cultures. The isolate was subjected to morphological and molecular identification revealing this to be a member of Desmodesmus sp. The axenic inoculum was subjected to mass culturing in 200 mL of BBM and kept in a shaker for 3 days under constant illumination of 1500 lux of white light at 25 °C. The biomass of Desmodesmus sp. was harvested at the exponential phase of growth and centrifuged at 5000 rpm (10 min) to obtain a pellet. Finally, it was washed with sterilized deionized water, dried at 40 °C, ground, sieved (100 µm), and stored (4 °C) for future use [39]. A schematic presentation of production and processing of biomass is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Reagents Preparation

The stock solutions of Cd and Pb and serial dilutions were prepared by dissolving CdCl2 and Pb (NO3)2 (1000 mg/L) in deionized water. In the next step, the pH (827 Metrohm benchtop pH meter, USA) of both solutions was adjusted between 2.0 and 8.0 [40].

2.3. Point of Zero Charge

To determine the point of zero charge (PZC) of algal sorbent, the addition of salt method was used with some modifications [41]. In nine different flasks, 40 mL of NaNO3 (0.1 M) were collected. Acid and base solution were used to attain the varied pH (2–10) levels. The algal biosorbent was then added to each flask and kept at 150 rpm for 24 h at room temperature. The mixtures were filtered, and their pH was noted one by one. The PZC value of algal biomass was obtained by plotting the graph between initial pH and change in pH.

2.4. Biosorption Experiments

Adsorption experiments were performed to examine the impact of pH, contact time, initial concentration of cadmium and lead ions, and sorbent dosage in the aqueous solutions. The optimum pH was studied using 100 mg/L Cd and Pb concentration at a contact time of 60 min. The impact of contact time was examined by sample collection at specified intervals of time (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min) at the 100 mg/L of metal concentration, pH 6 for cadmium, 5 for lead and biomass dosage 1 g/L. After optimizing the pH of the medium and contact time, the tests were performed with different initial concentrations of metal ions, keeping the time interval (60 min) constant. 1 g/L of amorphous algal biomass was mixed with a metal ion solution with a concentration ranging between 20 and 120 mg/L at optimized pH for cadmium and lead in a batch experiment at 23 °C. Another experiment was performed at optimized conditions to know the influence of biosorbent dosage, 0.5–2 g/L. Biosorption tests were performed in 10 mg/100 mL of metal solutions within a specific pH range and then mixed with algal biomass and agitated at 150 rpm with two replicates. Metal solution mixed with biosorbent was filtered, and the final concentration level of metals in the medium was assessed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry [42] (Agliant Technologies, MC187906, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia). The following formulas were used to compute the amount of sorbate adsorbed on the biosorbent, which described the efficiency of metal adsorption (as mg/g and removal percentage) [40,43].
q e = V C i C e M
R % = C i C e C i × 100
Here, in Equation (1), qe quantifies the adsorbed ions on the biosorbent, where Ci is an initial and Ce is the final level of metal concentration, V denotes the solution volume, whereas M represents the biomass of sorbent (g).

2.5. Analysis of Adsorption Kinetics

To decipher the biosorption mechanism, the sorption data were assessed against pseudo 1st order [44] and pseudo 2nd order [45]. Finally, the intraparticle diffusion model [46] was applied to determine the rate constants and order of reactions for the processes. The equations of adsorption kinetics were tabulated in Table 1.
k1 and k2 are constants for the 1st and 2nd order of adsorption. In Table 1, ki denotes the rate constant for intraparticle diffusion.

2.6. Adsorption Isotherms

The sorption isotherm models provide vital knowledge on the sorption process. Here, sorption data are evaluated using Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherms. The Langmuir isotherm presumptively involves monolayer adsorption on a solid surface with a predetermined number of identical sites [47]. Langmuir adsorption model [48] is specified by Equation (3).
1 q e = 1 q m a x + 1 b   q m a x C e
where qe is the sorbate content adsorbed onto the amorphous biomass of algae (biosorbent) at equilibrium, qmax is maximum adsorption capacity, b is the constant (Langmuir). b and qmax can be obtained from slope (1/qmaxb) and intercept (1/qmax) of the plot 1/qe verses 1/Ce.
In contrast to the above, the Freundlich adsorption isotherms account for the heterogeneous surfaces and multilayer adsorption process [49]. The Freundlich adsorption isotherm [48] in linear form is defined in Equation (4).
In q e = I n K F + 1 n I n C e
where qe represents the quantity of biosorbate adsorbed on the biosorbent (algal biomass), KF is Freundlich isotherm constant from a linear plot of ln qe vs. ln Ce.
The interaction between adsorbate molecules with sorbent sites may impact the adsorption properties. The Temkin adsorption, which asserts that as the concentration of sorbate molecules adsorbed on the sorbent rises, the adsorption heat of all molecules in the adsorption layer decreases linearly, suggests that the adsorbate and adsorbent may interact mutually. The Equation of Temkin isotherm model is presented in Equation (5) [50].
q e = B   l n ( K t C e )
B (mg/g) and kt (L/mg) are the constants of isotherm.

2.7. Desorption of Cd and Pb Ions from Metal Loaded Adsorbent

To effectively desorb the metal ions and restore the adsorbent for reuse, the reusability of the adsorbent was assessed by following the described techniques. To conduct the consecutive experiment of adsorption and desorption, the repetition of cycles (3 cycles) was done using the mentioned above preparations. Desorption studies were conducted by mixing loaded sorbent (metal) with desorption medium (0.1 M HNO3, 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M H2SO4) and were agitated at 150 rpm for 60 min. The amount of metal ions was determined by AAS [51]. The percentage of desorption efficiency was calculated by using Equation (6) [52].
D e s o r p t i o n   e f f i c i e n c y % = A m o u n t   o f   m e t a l   d e s o r b e d A m o u n t   o f   m e t a l   a d s o r b e d × 100

2.8. Characterization

FT-IR analysis (PerkinElmer Spectrum 65) was performed to figure out the functional groups involved during the adsorption of metal ions in Desmodesmus sp. from aqueous solutions. Three samples (R3 control, R3 Cd, and R3 Pb) were assessed. SEM (JSM5910, JEOL Japan) was performed to analyze the morphology before and after cadmium treatment and lead in Desmodesmus sp.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of pH on Metal Adsorption

pH is considered a main factor that affects the biosorption of metal ions in mixed solutions. The pH of the mixture impacts the sites (binding sites) that exist on the algal surface and the chemistry of the adsorbate present in the medium. The effect of pH on the adsorption of Cd and Pb onto Desmodesmus sp. was investigated in the pH range of 2–8, as shown in Figure 2. No notable effect of pH was observed on Cd and Pb adsorption at pH 2–4. Figure 2 clearly shows an increase in the biosorption process as the pH was increased and leveled off at pH 6.0 and 5.0 for Cd and Pb, while at pH > 6 for Cd and pH > 5, adsorption of metal ions started decreasing. However, the optimum pH for maximum metal uptake for each of the two metals differed, i.e., 6.0 and 5.0 for cadmium and lead, with the removal efficiency of 62% and 65%, respectively. As a result, all further experiments were performed at pH 6 for cadmium and pH 5 for lead.
The charge on the surface of biomass is positive when pH < pHPZC, whereas the negative charged surface is represented by pH > pHPZC. In this study, the pHPZC of algal sorbent is 3.9, as shown in Figure 3, and the optimum pH values of sorbent and sorbate were 5.0 and 6.0 for Cd and Pb. Based on the pHPZC values of the adsorbents, pH is above pHPZC, the sorbent will be negatively charged.

3.2. Effect of Contact Time on Biosorption of Metals Ions

The effect of contact time greatly influences the adsorption process. Figure 4 depicts the effect of contact time on the adsorption of Cd and Pb onto the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. The results depict that the adsorption of both metals was rapid in the first 20 min and then gradually increased till the equilibrium was reached after 60 min of contact with the adsorption efficiency of 58 and 60% for Cd and Pb, respectively, and then it remained almost constant.

3.3. Effect of Initial Concentration of Cd and Pb on Metal Adsorption

The impact of the initial concentration of metal ions on the adsorption capacities of metal ions in the presence of amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. is depicted in Figure 5. It was noted that the biosorption of Cd and Pb ions increased with an increase in the initial concentration of metal ions, and then it attained an equilibrium. The maximum adsorption capacity of metal ions (61 and 64 mg/g for Cd and Pb) on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. was obtained approximately at an initial metal ion concentration of 100 mg/L.

3.4. Effect of Biomass on Adsorption

The graphical form (Figure 6) clearly indicates that the removal efficiency of Desmodesmus sp. improved when there was an increase in adsorbent dosage. At 1 g/L of the sorbent dose, the optimum removal percentage was 63% and 66% for cadmium and lead, respectively. Once equilibrium was reached (at 1 g), no further increase in removal efficiency was observed.

3.5. Adsorption Kinetics

The determination coefficients (R2) for pseudo 1st order were observed to be significantly lower for Cd and Pb, as shown in Table 2. The experimental and calculated values of qe (Table 2) were not close to each other, as also depicted from the R2 values, pointing to the fact that the biosorption of these metals onto Desmodesmus sp. did not follow pseudo 1st order kinetics [53]. The R2 (determination coefficient) values of pseudo 2nd order is close to unity, i.e., 0.9952 for Cd and 0.9956 for Pb, respectively. The calculated values of qe for Cd and Pb are 62.5 and 62.8 mg/g, showing agreement with qe, exp (experimental values) in pseudo 2nd order of kinetics (Table 2). The intraparticle diffusion model helped to define the mechanism of adsorption. The values of R2 for cadmium and lead were noted as 0.7834 and 0.7554, respectively. The coefficient values were not close to unity. The kinetics models are presented in Figure 7.

3.6. Adsorption Isotherms

The parameters of the adsorption isotherm displayed in Table 3 explain the biosorption of metal ions is followed by the Langmuir sorption isotherm due to higher R2 values of cadmium and lead when compared to other isotherms. The value of qmax, calculated by Langmuir isotherm, was observed at 64.1 and 62.5 mg/g for Cd and Pb, respectively, as shown in Table 3. The 1/n values (Table 3) obtained were 0.361 and 0.286 for Cd and Pb, respectively. The plots of different isotherms are shown in Figure 8.
In addition, Table 4 compares the biosorption capacity of Desmodesmus for Cd and Pb with that of other biosorbents. Desmodesmus sp. has a better biosorption capacity for these metal ions than other adsorbents in Table 4. Therefore, it is noteworthy that the Desmodesmus has a high potential for removing metal ions from an aqueous solution.

3.7. Desorption Studies

To demonstrate the reusability of the sorbent, the desorption of Cd and Pb ions (adsorbed) from the sorbent was examined using different desorption solutions. Results show that HNO3 and HCl are effective agents for desorption, as shown in Figure 9. However, HNO3 damages the adsorbent at high concentrations. The process of desorption was repeated thrice by using HCl. However, the adsorption-desorption processes did not significantly alter the adsorption capability of the biosorbent under study, and desorption of both metals was reached by more than 90% (Table 5).

3.8. Adsorption Mechanism

A comparative analysis of FTIR spectra in the case of pre-adsorption and post-adsorption samples revealed a possible mode of adsorption mechanism for Desmodesmus sp. Figure 10 depicts the functional groups that are involved in the process of adsorption. The control represents the peak (black) at 3306 cm−1, demonstrating the presence of N-H or O-H functional groups [59]. The C-H stretching vibrations are in 2932–2842 cm−1 [60]. The C=O stretching vibration band appears at 1754 cm−1 for carbonyl functional groups. The absorption band of C=O of amide linkage appeared in the range of 1646 and 1539 cm−1. The absorption band located near 1243 cm−1 corresponds to C-N functionality, and the band at 1012 cm−1 indicates the existence of C-O stretching band.
The FTIR spectrum shows metal ions bound to the functional groups of sorbents, and many changes were noted (red and blue peaks) from the original spectrum (black peak, Figure 10). The N-H/O-H band is shifted from 3306 to 3189 cm−1 (Cd) and 3277 cm−1 (Pb), which depicts the interaction of metal ions with amide and hydroxyl groups. The band’s disappearance at 1754 cm−1 indicates metal binding to the carbonyl group in both metals. The complex band of amide C-N is shifted from 1243 to 1290 cm−1 in Cd. Similarly, the C-O stretching band shifts from 1012 to 1042 cm−1 and 1059 cm−1 for Cd and Pb, respectively. The results support a sufficient efficiency of metal surface binding capability.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the raw biomass of Desmodesmus sp. (Figure S1) revealed the porous nature of the cell surface with a transparent layer on the outer surface of the cell wall. The porous surface of the cell wall increases the surface area of the sorbent and improves the biosorption of metal ions. Possible mechanisms for the biosorption of metal ions from the aqueous system are shown in Figure 11.

4. Discussion

The effect of different factors on the adsorption of heavy metals is usually investigated in batch experiments. The observations mentioned above in Figure 2 could be described by the fact that at lower pH, hydrogen ions and metal ions compete to form ligands at the surface of the sorbent (because of the charge repulsion) [61]. The increase in the sorption of metal ions is due to the increasing values of pH because the proton concentration decreases and the algal surface gets negatively charged, maximizing the biosorption of metal ions [39]. The maximum adsorption efficiency of metals occurred at different values of pH due to the different characteristics of the metals, e.g., electronegativity and the availability of metal ions that were better adsorbed on the binding sites of the sorbent [62]. Similar results have been described concerning the effect of pH on the adsorption of heavy metals by the biomass of various algal species [51]. The charge on the surface of biomass is necessary as it determines the interaction between sorbent and sorbate, therefore, it is compulsory to know the charge on the surface of the sorbent while doing the sorption tests. When the solution pH is above pHPZC, the adsorbent will be negatively charged, and due to the electrostatic force of interaction, it binds to the more positive charge [63]. The obtained contact time in this study for both metals was 60 min. In the first 20 min, the reaction rate was fast, gradually decreasing and finally leveling off with no significant changes beyond 60 min. Similar outcomes have been noted for the green algal biomass of Chlorella vulgaris [43]. Previously, 60 min were also reported as an optimum contact time for the adsorption of cadmium [39] and lead [40] by the dried biomass of blue-green and green algae. After that, no significant changes were observed because of the saturation of binding sites with the metal ions on the surface of the biosorbent [64]. An increase in the initial concentration of heavy metal ions decreased the mass transfer resistance between the sorbate and sorbent. This, consequently, assisted the approaching adsorbate to active sites, thus improving the capacity to adsorb. At that point, the saturation of binding sites was achieved in the stipulated time with no further adsorption. The process of adsorption is related to the dosage of biomass in the aqueous solution because of the presence of binding sites on the adsorbent surface [65]. Figure 6 revealed the behavior of metal ions at various doses of biosorbent, and removal efficiency was not increased after 1 g of biomass dosage. This performance could be described by the fact that the formation of aggregates of the adsorbent decreases the surface area and biosorption process of metal ions [54].
The collected data revealed that the adsorption of Cd and Pb on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. follows the pseudo 2nd order of kinetics [66,67]. It could be presumed from the results mentioned above (Table 2) that the metal-Desmodesmus biosorption mechanism was likely controlled by the chemosorption process involving covalent bonds or ion exchange between the sorbent and sorbate until all active sites were engaged, then metal ions were diffused into the adsorbent for further interactions. Similar findings were described by [68] in the material deployed to eliminate pollutants. The trend line in intra-particle diffusion was not observed to pass through the origin, which clearly indicated that this model is not supported by the data [69,70].
In order to study the interaction between adsorbate and adsorbent and design the adsorption process, adsorption equilibrium data were described by various isotherm models. The R2 values of cadmium and lead were higher in Langmuir sorption isotherm when compared to other isotherms [71]. The Langmuir model indicates the homogeneous surface of the biosorbent and the monolayer adsorption of positive ions on the surface of microalgae. The 1/n values (Table 3) obtained ranged between 0 and 1, indicating Cd and Pb adsorption is favorable [72]. Therefore, this investigation demonstrates that the Langmuir model is well fitted to the observed data as manifested through various isotherms [73,74]. Under acidic conditions, the metal desorption caused protonation of the biosorbent surface, allowing the desorption of ions (positively charged) from the biosorbent [75]. Some recently performed experiments reported HCl as a desorbing agent [43,76]. In addition, an effective prospective sorbent to eliminate heavy metal ions must have good adsorption and recovery ability of metal ions [77].
The spectrum (Figure 10) explains the existence of main functional groups like carbonyl, hydroxyl, amide, and amines primarily involved in metal adsorption. Similar interpretations were put forth by [43], describing Cd ion adsorption in green alga Chlorella vulgaris. The monographs (Figure S1) demonstrate that the algae-based biosorbents reduce the porosity of the surface when brought in contact with metal ions, forming a flat structure [40]. Our results further revealed the morphological changes that have occurred due to the interlinking of Cd and Pb and the functional groups present algal cell wall [61].

5. Conclusions

Experiments on Desmodesmus sp. are concluded as follows: Removal efficiency of Cd and Pb was 63% and 66% at optimized conditions. The biosorption process correlated with the pseudo 2nd order kinetics model, and adsorption equilibrium data showed the best fit with the Langmuir model. The value of the qmax of amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. for Cd and Pb was 64.1 and 62.5 mg/g, respectively. Desorption of metal ions from the biosorbent was more than 90% by using hydrochloric acid. FTIR data showed the role of carbonyl, hydroxyl, amine, and amide groups present on the surface of the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. in the adsorption process. SEM data showed morphological changes in the treated and untreated amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp., which revealed the efficient adsorption capacity for the elimination of metal ions from wastewater. Our research provides a foundation for future studies at the molecular level to develop a system that detects and eliminates heavy metals from the environment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su151511634/s1, Figure S1: SEM micrograph of Desmodesmus sp. (a) virgin biomass (b) after Cd biosorption, and (c) after Pb biosorption.

Author Contributions

R.W. and A.S.M. generated the idea. Experimental facilities and supervision were provided by A.S.M. Experimental study was performed by R.W., S.R. and M.K., R.W. and J.I. wrote the manuscript. S.R., M.K., L.A.M., N.U., F.K., J.I. and W.C., helped with software, manuscript editing and revision. F.A.A.-M. and H.A.E.-S. reviewed and edited the manuscript and provided funds. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP2023R19), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the raw data of this research can be obtained from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP2023R19), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lin, N.; Wang, R.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X. Iron-based materials for simultaneous removal of heavy metal (loid) s and emerging organic contaminants from the aquatic environment: Recent advances and perspectives. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 299, 118871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sharma, R.; Agrawal, P.R.; Kumar, R.; Gupta, G. Current scenario of heavy metal contamination in water. Contam. Water 2021, 49–64. [Google Scholar]
  3. Waheed, A.; Baig, N.; Ullah, N.; Falath, W. Removal of hazardous dyes, toxic metal ions and organic pollutants from wastewater by using porous hyper-cross-linked polymeric materials: A review of recent advances. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 287, 112360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nateras-Ramírez, O.; Martinez-Macias, M.; Sánchez-Machado, D.; López-Cervantes, J.; Aguilar-Ruiz, R. An overview of microalgae for Cd2+ and Pb2+ biosorption from wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021, 17, 100932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luo, H.; Gu, R.; Ouyang, H.; Wang, L.; Shi, S.; Ji, Y.; Bao, B.; Liao, G.; Xu, B. Cadmium exposure induces osteoporosis through cellular senescence, associated with activation of NF-κB pathway and mitochondrial dysfunction. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 290, 118043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Njati, S.Y.; Maguta, M.M. Lead-based paints and children’s PVC toys are potential sources of domestic lead poisoning–A review. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 249, 1091–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al-Homaidan, A.A.; Al-Abbad, A.F.; Al-Hazzani, A.A.; Al-Ghanayem, A.A.; Alabdullatif, J.A. Lead removal by Spirulina platensis biomass. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2016, 18, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Singh, K.; Singh, A.; Hasan, S. Low cost bio-sorbent ‘wheat bran’ for the removal of cadmium from wastewater: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 994–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cheng, J.; Yin, W.; Chang, Z.; Lundholm, N.; Jiang, Z. Biosorption capacity and kinetics of cadmium (II) on live and dead Chlorella vulgaris. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, M.; Wu, Z.; Yang, L.; Xia, S.; Zhao, J. Adsorption of Pb (II) from aqueous solution to Ni-doped bamboo charcoal. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 19, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, J.M.; Hao, O.J. Microbial chromium (VI) reduction. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 28, 219–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Farooqi, H.M.U.; Khalid, M.A.U.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, S.R.; Choi, K.H. Real-time physiological sensor-based liver-on-chip device for monitoring drug toxicity. J. Micromechanics Microeng. 2020, 30, 115013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Farooqi, H.M.U.; Kim, K.-H.; Kausar, F.; Muhammad, J.; Bukhari, H.; Choi, K.-H. Frequency and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from placenta of mothers with term and preterm deliveries. Life 2022, 12, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Farooqi, H.M.U.; Sammantasinghar, A.; Kausar, F.; Farooqi, M.A.; Chethikkattuveli Salih, A.R.; Hyun, K.; Lim, J.-H.; Khalil, A.A.K.; Mumtaz, A.S.; Choi, K.H. Study of the Anticancer Potential of Plant Extracts Using Liver Tumor Microphysiological System. Life 2022, 12, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jalilian, N.; Najafpour, G.D.; Khajouei, M. Macro and micro algae in pollution control and biofuel production–a review. ChemBioEng Rev. 2020, 7, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barakat, M. New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab. J. Chem. 2011, 4, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ahluwalia, S.S.; Goyal, D. Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2243–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Awwad, A.; Amer, M.; Al-aqarbeh, M. TiO2-kaolinite nanocomposite prepared from the Jordanian Kaolin clay: Adsorption and thermodynamics of Pb (II) and Cd (II) ions in aqueous solution. Chem. Int. 2020, 6, 168–178. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ahmadzadeh, S.; Yoosefian, M.; Rezayi, M. Comprehensive experimental and theoretical investigations on chromium (III) trace detection in biological and environmental samples using polymeric membrane sensor. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2021, 101, 1461–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chong, A.; Wong, Y.; Tam, N. Performance of different microalgal species in removing nickel and zinc from industrial wastewater. Chemosphere 2000, 41, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Benabdallah, N.; Harrache, D.; Mir, A.; De La Guardia, M.; Benhachem, F. Bioaccumulation of trace metals by red alga Corallina elongata in the coast of Beni Saf, west coast, Algeria. Chem. Int. 2017, 3, 220–231. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hussain, F.; Shah, S.Z.; Ahmad, H.; Abubshait, S.A.; Abubshait, H.A.; Laref, A.; Manikandan, A.; Kusuma, H.S.; Iqbal, M. Microalgae an ecofriendly and sustainable wastewater treatment option: Biomass application in biofuel and bio-fertilizer production. A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 137, 110603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Madrid, Y.; Cámara, C. Biological substrates for metal preconcentration and speciation. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 1997, 16, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Priyadharshini, S.D.; Babu, P.S.; Manikandan, S.; Subbaiya, R.; Govarthanan, M.; Karmegam, N. Phycoremediation of wastewater for pollutant removal: A green approach to environmental protection and long-term remediation. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 290, 117989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chojnacka, K.; Chojnacki, A.; Gorecka, H. Biosorption of Cr3+, Cd2+ and Cu2+ ions by blue–green algae Spirulina sp.: Kinetics, equilibrium and the mechanism of the process. Chemosphere 2005, 59, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sharma, P.; Sirohi, R.; Tong, Y.W.; Kim, S.H.; Pandey, A. Metal and metal (loids) removal efficiency using genetically engineered microbes: Applications and challenges. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Qin, H.; Hu, T.; Zhai, Y.; Lu, N.; Aliyeva, J. The improved methods of heavy metals removal by biosorbents: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 258, 113777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Taniguchi, J.; Hemmi, H.; Tanahashi, K.; Amano, N.; Nakayama, T.; Nishino, T. Zinc biosorption by a zinc-resistant bacterium, Brevibacterium sp. strain HZM-1. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 54, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Davis, T.A.; Volesky, B.; Mucci, A. A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae. Water Res. 2003, 37, 4311–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kausar, F.; Farooqi, M.-A.; Farooqi, H.-M.-U.; Salih, A.-R.-C.; Khalil, A.-A.-K.; Kang, C.-W.; Mahmoud, M.H.; Batiha, G.-E.-S.; Choi, K.-H.; Mumtaz, A.-S. Phytochemical investigation, antimicrobial, antioxidant and anticancer activities of acer cappadocicum gled. Life 2021, 11, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kausar, F.; Kim, K.-H.; Farooqi, H.M.U.; Farooqi, M.A.; Kaleem, M.; Waqar, R.; Khalil, A.A.K.; Khuda, F.; Abdul Rahim, C.S.; Hyun, K. Evaluation of antimicrobial and anticancer activities of selected medicinal plants of himalayas, Pakistan. Plants 2021, 11, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mehta, S.; Gaur, J. Use of algae for removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: Progress and prospects. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2005, 25, 113–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Eccles, H. Treatment of metal-contaminated wastes: Why select a biological process? Trends Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 462–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bilal, M.; Rasheed, T.; Sosa-Hernández, J.E.; Raza, A.; Nabeel, F.; Iqbal, H.M. Biosorption: An interplay between marine algae and potentially toxic elements—A review. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Manzoor, F.; Karbassi, A.; Golzary, A. Removal of heavy metal contaminants from wastewater by using Chlorella vulgaris beijerinck: A review. Curr. Environ. Manag. (Former. Curr. Environ. Eng.) 2019, 6, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mustafa, S.; Bhatti, H.N.; Maqbool, M.; Iqbal, M. Microalgae biosorption, bioaccumulation and biodegradation efficiency for the remediation of wastewater and carbon dioxide mitigation: Prospects, challenges and opportunities. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 41, 102009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rangsayatorn, N.; Upatham, E.; Kruatrachue, M.; Pokethitiyook, P.; Lanza, G. Phytoremediation potential of Spirulina (Arthrospira) platensis: Biosorption and toxicity studies of cadmium. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 119, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Piotrowska-Niczyporuk, A.; Bajguz, A.; Zambrzycka, E.; Godlewska-Żyłkiewicz, B. Phytohormones as regulators of heavy metal biosorption and toxicity in green alga Chlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyceae). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 52, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abdel-Aty, A.M.; Ammar, N.S.; Ghafar, H.H.A.; Ali, R.K. Biosorption of cadmium and lead from aqueous solution by fresh water alga Anabaena sphaerica biomass. J. Adv. Res. 2013, 4, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mirghaffari, N.; Moeini, E.; Farhadian, O. Biosorption of Cd and Pb ions from aqueous solutions by biomass of the green microalga, Scenedesmus quadricauda. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Munim, S.A.; Saddique, M.T.; Raza, Z.A.; Majeed, M.I. Preparation and physico-chemical characterization of β-cyclodextrin incorporated chitosan biosorbent beads with potential environmental applications. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 065503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Al-Rub, F.A.; El-Naas, M.; Ashour, I.; Al-Marzouqi, M. Biosorption of copper on Chlorella vulgaris from single, binary and ternary metal aqueous solutions. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, M.; Singh, A.K.; Sikandar, M. Study of sorption and desorption of Cd (II) from aqueous solution using isolated green algae Chlorella vulgaris. Appl. Water Sci. 2018, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Lagergren, S. Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption geloster stoffe. Kungliga svenska vetenskapsakademiens. Handlingar 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ho, Y.-S.; McKay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Weber Jr, W.J.; Morris, J.C. Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. 1963, 89, 31–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, D.; Li, J.; Gu, Q.; Song, S.; Peng, C. Co-influence of the pore size of adsorbents and the structure of adsorbates on adsorption of dyes. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 14686–14695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chinedu, O.J.; Charles, M.; Onyema, A.M. Equilibrium, kinetic, thermodynamic and thermal stability studies on sorption of Ni (II) ions from aqueous solution using dead biomass of fresh water green algae Cosmarium panamense. Der Chem. Sin. 2012, 3, 38–51. [Google Scholar]
  49. Radi, S.; El Abiad, C.; Moura, N.M.; Faustino, M.A.; Neves, M.G.P. New hybrid adsorbent based on porphyrin functionalized silica for heavy metals removal: Synthesis, characterization, isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 370, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Areco, M.M.; dos Santos Afonso, M. Copper, zinc, cadmium and lead biosorption by Gymnogongrus torulosus. Thermodynamics and kinetics studies. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2010, 81, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tüzün, I.; Bayramoğlu, G.; Yalçın, E.; Başaran, G.; Celik, G.; Arıca, M.Y. Equilibrium and kinetic studies on biosorption of Hg (II), Cd (II) and Pb (II) ions onto microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Environ. Manag. 2005, 77, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ezeonuegbu, B.A.; Machido, D.A.; Whong, C.M.; Japhet, W.S.; Alexiou, A.; Elazab, S.T.; Qusty, N.; Yaro, C.A.; Batiha, G.E.-S. Agricultural waste of sugarcane bagasse as efficient adsorbent for lead and nickel removal from untreated wastewater: Biosorption, equilibrium isotherms, kinetics and desorption studies. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 30, e00614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Oliveira, W.E.; Franca, A.S.; Oliveira, L.S.; Rocha, S.D. Untreated coffee husks as biosorbents for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sarı, A.; Tuzen, M. Biosorption of Pb (II) and Cd (II) from aqueous solution using green alga (Ulva lactuca) biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fourest, E.; Roux, J.-C. Heavy metal biosorption by fungal mycelial by-products: Mechanisms and influence of pH. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1992, 37, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Roy, D.; Greenlaw, P.N.; Shane, B.S. Adsorption of heavy metals by green algae and ground rice hulls. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 1993, 28, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pavasant, P.; Apiratikul, R.; Sungkhum, V.; Suthiparinyanont, P.; Wattanachira, S.; Marhaba, T.F. Biosorption of Cu2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ using dried marine green macroalga Caulerpa lentillifera. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 2321–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yan, G.; Viraraghavan, T. Heavy-metal removal from aqueous solution by fungus Mucor rouxii. Water Res. 2003, 37, 4486–4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pan, J.-H.; Liu, R.-X.; Tang, H.-X. Surface reaction of Bacillus cereus biomass and its biosorption for lead and copper ions. J. Environ. Sci. 2007, 19, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mungasavalli, D.P.; Viraraghavan, T.; Jin, Y.-C. Biosorption of chromium from aqueous solutions by pretreated Aspergillus niger: Batch and column studies. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 301, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Arief, V.O.; Trilestari, K.; Sunarso, J.; Indraswati, N.; Ismadji, S. Recent progress on biosorption of heavy metals from liquids using low cost biosorbents: Characterization, biosorption parameters and mechanism studies. CLEAN–Soil Air Water 2008, 36, 937–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, Z.; Ma, W.; Han, M. Biosorption of nickel and copper onto treated alga (Undaria pinnatifida): Application of isotherm and kinetic models. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 155, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Iqbal, M.; Saeed, A.; Zafar, S.I. FTIR spectrophotometry, kinetics and adsorption isotherms modeling, ion exchange, and EDX analysis for understanding the mechanism of Cd2+ and Pb2+ removal by mango peel waste. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sun, J.; Ji, Y.; Cai, F.; Li, J. Heavy metal removal through biosorptive pathways. In Advances in Water Treatment and Pollution Prevention; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 95–145. [Google Scholar]
  65. Shen, W.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y. Surface chemical functional groups modification of porous carbon. Recent Pat. Chem. Eng. 2008, 1, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bulgariu, D.; Bulgariu, L. Equilibrium and kinetics studies of heavy metal ions biosorption on green algae waste biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 103, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kaleem, M.; Minhas, L.A.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Ali, M.A.; Mahmoud, R.M.; Saqib, S.; Nazish, M.; Zaman, W.; Samad Mumtaz, A. Biosorption of Cadmium and Lead by Dry Biomass of Nostoc sp. MK-11: Kinetic and Isotherm Study. Molecules 2023, 28, 2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gupta, V.; Rastogi, A. Equilibrium and kinetic modelling of cadmium (II) biosorption by nonliving algal biomass Oedogonium sp. from aqueous phase. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 153, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Mane, V.S.; Mall, I.D.; Srivastava, V.C. Kinetic and equilibrium isotherm studies for the adsorptive removal of Brilliant Green dye from aqueous solution by rice husk ash. J. Environ. Manag. 2007, 84, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Freundlich, H. Über die adsorption in lösungen. Z. Für Phys. Chem. 1907, 57, 385–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Khan, T.A.; Mukhlif, A.A.; Khan, E.A.; Sharma, D.K. Isotherm and kinetics modeling of Pb (II) and Cd (II) adsorptive uptake from aqueous solution by chemically modified green algal biomass. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2016, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lokeshwari, N.; Joshi, K. Biosorption of heavy metal (chromium) using biomass. Glob. J. Environ. Res. 2009, 3, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  73. Singh, A.; Mehta, S.; Gaur, J. Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by common freshwater filamentous algae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 23, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Waqar, R.; Kaleem, M.; Iqbal, J.; Minhas, L.A.; Haris, M.; Chalgham, W.; Ahmad, A.; Mumtaz, A.S. Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies on the Adsorption of Lead and Cadmium from Aqueous Solution Using Scenedesmus sp. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hong, J.; Xie, J.; Mirshahghassemi, S.; Lead, J. Metal (Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb) removal from environmentally relevant waters using polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated magnetite nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 3266–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Katırcıoğlu, H.; Aslım, B.; Türker, A.R.; Atıcı, T.; Beyatlı, Y. Removal of cadmium (II) ion from aqueous system by dry biomass, immobilized live and heat-inactivated Oscillatoria sp. H1 isolated from freshwater (Mogan Lake). Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4185–4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mondal, S.; Aikat, K.; Halder, G. Biosorptive uptake of arsenic (V) by steam activated carbon from mung bean husk: Equilibrium, kinetics, thermodynamics and modeling. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 4479–4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematical presentation of production and processing of biomass.
Figure 1. Schematical presentation of production and processing of biomass.
Sustainability 15 11634 g001
Figure 2. Influence of solution pH on biosorption of metal ions on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. Each point is the mean of three data and vertical bars denote standard error within triplicate.
Figure 2. Influence of solution pH on biosorption of metal ions on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. Each point is the mean of three data and vertical bars denote standard error within triplicate.
Sustainability 15 11634 g002
Figure 3. PZC curve of Desmodesmus sp.
Figure 3. PZC curve of Desmodesmus sp.
Sustainability 15 11634 g003
Figure 4. Effect of contact time on the adsorption of metal ions by Desmodesmus sp. Each point is the mean of three data and vertical bars denote standard error within triplicate.
Figure 4. Effect of contact time on the adsorption of metal ions by Desmodesmus sp. Each point is the mean of three data and vertical bars denote standard error within triplicate.
Sustainability 15 11634 g004
Figure 5. Effect of initial metal concentration on adsorption of metal ions on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. Each point is the mean of three data and vertical bars denote standard error within triplicate.
Figure 5. Effect of initial metal concentration on adsorption of metal ions on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. Each point is the mean of three data and vertical bars denote standard error within triplicate.
Sustainability 15 11634 g005
Figure 6. Influence of biomass on adsorption of metal ions on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. Each point is the mean of three data and vertical bars denote standard error within triplicate.
Figure 6. Influence of biomass on adsorption of metal ions on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. Each point is the mean of three data and vertical bars denote standard error within triplicate.
Sustainability 15 11634 g006
Figure 7. (a) Pseudo 1st order, (b) pseudo 2nd order, and (c) intra particle kinetics models for Cd and Pb adsorption on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp.
Figure 7. (a) Pseudo 1st order, (b) pseudo 2nd order, and (c) intra particle kinetics models for Cd and Pb adsorption on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp.
Sustainability 15 11634 g007
Figure 8. (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, and (c) Temkin model for Cd and Pb sorption on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp.
Figure 8. (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, and (c) Temkin model for Cd and Pb sorption on the amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp.
Sustainability 15 11634 g008
Figure 9. Percentage of desorption by using different desorbents.
Figure 9. Percentage of desorption by using different desorbents.
Sustainability 15 11634 g009
Figure 10. FTIR spectra of unloaded and loaded curves with Cd and Pb of Desmodesmus sp.
Figure 10. FTIR spectra of unloaded and loaded curves with Cd and Pb of Desmodesmus sp.
Sustainability 15 11634 g010
Figure 11. Different mechanisms in the biosorption process. Metal ions adsorb to the surface of algae in surface adsorption. Ion exchange occurs between adsorbent (algae) and adsorbate when the light metal ions, such as magnesium, already attached to a functional group, are released, followed by heavy metal ion adsorption onto algae. Different functional groups on algal cell wall play the main role in binding of metal ions in complexation and electrical attraction (through van der Waals interaction).
Figure 11. Different mechanisms in the biosorption process. Metal ions adsorb to the surface of algae in surface adsorption. Ion exchange occurs between adsorbent (algae) and adsorbate when the light metal ions, such as magnesium, already attached to a functional group, are released, followed by heavy metal ion adsorption onto algae. Different functional groups on algal cell wall play the main role in binding of metal ions in complexation and electrical attraction (through van der Waals interaction).
Sustainability 15 11634 g011
Table 1. The linearized form of kinetics model and isotherms.
Table 1. The linearized form of kinetics model and isotherms.
Kinetic Model Linearized EquationGraphical Dependence
Pseudo 1st order L o g q e q t = l o g q e k 1 t 2.303 log (qe − qt) vs. time
Pseudo 2nd order t q t = 1 k 2 q e 2 + 1 q e t t/qt vs. time
Intra-Particle diffusion q t = k i t 0.5 + I qt vs. time 0.5
Table 2. A comparison among rate constants of different kinetics models.
Table 2. A comparison among rate constants of different kinetics models.
MetalPseudo 1st OrderPseudo 2nd OrderIntraparticle Diffusion
K1 (min−1) qe (mg/g) R2K2 (g mg−1 min−1) qe (mg/g)R2Ki(mg g−1 min−1) R2qe exp (mg/g)
Cd−0.034545 27.5100.831327,297.362.50.99523.91890.783458
Pb−0.029478 22.8190.713536,090.762.80.9956 3.60350.755460
Table 3. Adsorption isotherm parameters for the biosorption of metal ions using biomass of Desmodesmus sp. pH 6 and 5 for Cd and Pb, contact time 60 min, biosorbent dosage 1 g/L.
Table 3. Adsorption isotherm parameters for the biosorption of metal ions using biomass of Desmodesmus sp. pH 6 and 5 for Cd and Pb, contact time 60 min, biosorbent dosage 1 g/L.
MetalLangmuir ConstantsFreundlich ConstantsTemkin Constants
1/bqmax (mg g−1) R2KF (mg g−1) 1/nR2B R2
Cd 5.15364.10.9941 572.1370.3610.947513.2030.9742
Pb 2.27562.50.98641250.550.2860.925811.0010.9628
Table 4. A comparison of adsorption capacity between different sorbents and Desmodesmus sp.
Table 4. A comparison of adsorption capacity between different sorbents and Desmodesmus sp.
BiosorbentBiosorption Capacity (mg/g)
CdPbReferences
U. lactuca29.234.7[54]
Rhizopus arrhizus27.056.0[55]
Chlorella minutissima11.19.74[56]
Caulerpa lentillifera4.728.7[57]
Mucor rouxii8.535.7[58]
Desmodesmus sp64.162.5Current study
Table 5. Reusability of amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. (0.1 M, 50 mL HCl with contact time of 60 min at 150 rpm).
Table 5. Reusability of amorphous biomass of Desmodesmus sp. (0.1 M, 50 mL HCl with contact time of 60 min at 150 rpm).
MetalCycles% Sorption% Desorption
Cd161 ± 0.5793.4 ± 0.63
261 ± 0.5790.1 ± 0.63
360 ± 0.5791.6 ± 0.57
Pb164 ± 0.5795.3 ± 0.57
263 ± 0.5793.6 ± 0.57
363 ± 0.5792 ± 0.57
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Waqar, R.; Rahman, S.; Iqbal, J.; Kaleem, M.; Minhas, L.A.; Ullah, N.; Kausar, F.; Chalgham, W.; Al-Misned, F.A.; El-Serehy, H.A.; et al. Biosorption Potential of Desmodesmus sp. for the Sequestration of Cadmium and Lead from Contaminated Water. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511634

AMA Style

Waqar R, Rahman S, Iqbal J, Kaleem M, Minhas LA, Ullah N, Kausar F, Chalgham W, Al-Misned FA, El-Serehy HA, et al. Biosorption Potential of Desmodesmus sp. for the Sequestration of Cadmium and Lead from Contaminated Water. Sustainability. 2023; 15(15):11634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Waqar, Rooma, Sultana Rahman, Javed Iqbal, Muhammad Kaleem, Lubna Anjum Minhas, Nabi Ullah, Farzana Kausar, Wadie Chalgham, Fahad A. Al-Misned, Hamed A. El-Serehy, and et al. 2023. "Biosorption Potential of Desmodesmus sp. for the Sequestration of Cadmium and Lead from Contaminated Water" Sustainability 15, no. 15: 11634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop