Unveiling Sustainability in Ecommerce: GPT-Powered Software for Identifying Sustainable Product Features
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Sustainable Products and Attributes
2.1.1. Sustainable Products
2.1.2. Sustainable Products Attributes
Environmental Attributes
Social Attributes
Economic Attributes
2.1.3. Main Sustainable Product Features
- Organic: The term “organic” refers to a specific attribute of a product, particularly in the context of food and agriculture. Organic products are grown, produced, and processed using methods that prioritize environmental sustainability and the avoidance of synthetic chemicals [27]. Organic farming practices focus on enhancing soil health, biodiversity, and ecological balance, while minimizing the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, antibiotics, and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) [28]. Organic products are cultivated using natural fertilizers like compost or manure, and their pest and disease control measures rely on natural methods such as crop rotation, biological pest control, and the use of beneficial insects. By adhering to these principles, organic products aim to reduce environmental impacts, promote soil fertility, protect natural ecosystems, and offer consumers a healthier and more sustainable choice [29]. Organic certification standards, such as those set by regulatory bodies or third-party organizations, ensure that products labeled as “organic” meet specific criteria and undergo regular inspections to maintain their organic integrity [30,31].
- Fair trade: Fair trade is a product feature or certification emphasizing ethical and equitable trading practices, particularly in international trade with producers in developing countries [32]. It ensures that producers receive fair compensation, promotes sustainable livelihoods, and supports community development [32]. Fair trade certification guarantees that the product has been sourced from producers who meet specific social, economic, and environmental standards [33]. By supporting fair trade products, consumers contribute to the empowerment of small-scale farmers, artisans, and workers, addressing social and economic inequalities while promoting sustainable development [25]. Fair trade serves as a significant feature in the realm of sustainable products by fostering fairer trade relationships and promoting the well-being of marginalized producers [34].
- Recyclable: The “recyclable” feature is a crucial attribute of sustainable products, as it promotes the efficient use of resources and minimizes waste [35]. Recyclable products can be collected, processed, and transformed into new materials or products, reducing the demand for virgin resources and the environmental impact of extraction [36]. By designing products with recyclability in mind, manufacturers contribute to the circular economy, where materials are kept in use for as long as possible [37]. Recycling also helps reduce landfill waste and the associated environmental and health hazards, making it essential to achieving a more sustainable and resource-efficient society [35].
- Reusable: The “reusable” feature offers an alternative to single-use items that contribute to waste and resource depletion. Reusable products are designed to be used multiple times, reducing the need for constant replacements [38]. By encouraging reuse, these products minimize the environmental impact associated with manufacturing, transportation, and disposal [39]. Reusable products can include items such as shopping bags, water bottles, coffee cups, and food containers, providing consumers with sustainable choices that reduce their reliance on disposable options [38]. By embracing reusable products, individuals can significantly contribute to waste reduction and the conservation of resources, ultimately promoting a more sustainable and environmentally friendly lifestyle [39].
- Renewable energy: The “renewable energy” feature involves harnessing energy from renewable sources that are naturally replenished. By utilizing renewable energy sources like solar, wind, hydro, or geothermal power, sustainable products reduce reliance on fossil fuels and contribute to mitigating climate change [40]. Incorporating renewable energy into product design and production processes helps minimize greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, promoting cleaner and more sustainable energy systems [41]. Furthermore, the adoption of renewable energy in manufacturing can lead to energy cost savings, increased energy independence, and a more resilient and sustainable economy [40]. By embracing renewable energy, sustainable products contribute to a greener future and support the transition to a low-carbon and sustainable energy system.
- Energy efficient: The “energy efficient” feature is a crucial characteristic of sustainable products as it helps minimize energy consumption and reduce environmental impact [42]. Energy-efficient products are designed to use less energy while maintaining their functionality and performance. By incorporating energy-efficient technologies and design principles, these products contribute to lower energy bills, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and more sustainable use of resources [43]. Additionally, energy-efficient products often meet or exceed strict energy efficiency standards set by regulatory bodies, ensuring their reliability and effectiveness. By promoting energy efficiency, sustainable products help combat climate change, conserve natural resources, and support a more sustainable and energy-conscious lifestyle [42].
- Sustainable packaging: “Sustainable packaging” focuses on minimizing the environmental impact of product packaging. It involves using materials and design strategies that prioritize resource efficiency, waste reduction, and recyclability [44]. Sustainable packaging aims to minimize the use of non-renewable resources, such as petroleum-based plastics and encourages the use of renewable and biodegradable materials. Additionally, sustainable packaging considers the entire lifecycle of the product, including its production, transportation, use, and end-of-life disposal, striving for minimal environmental impact at each stage [45]. By adopting sustainable packaging practices, products can contribute to reducing plastic pollution, conserving resources, and promoting a more circular and environmentally friendly economy [44].
- Biodegradable/compostable: The “biodegradable/compostable” feature is a significant attribute of sustainable products as it relates to their ability to break down naturally and return to the environment without leaving harmful residues [46]. Biodegradable products can be broken down by microorganisms into natural elements over time, minimizing their impact on ecosystems [47]. Compostable products, on the other hand, are specifically designed to break down in composting systems, resulting in nutrient-rich soil that can be used for agricultural purposes [48]. The use of biodegradable or compostable materials reduces waste and landfill burden, promotes sustainable waste management practices, and supports the transition towards a more circular economy [46]. By choosing biodegradable or compostable products, consumers can make a positive impact on environmental conservation and contribute to a more sustainable future.
- Low carbon footprint: The “low carbon footprint” feature is a sustainable product attribute signifying products’ minimal contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change [49]. Products with a low carbon footprint are designed, manufactured, and distributed in a manner that minimizes energy consumption and the release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. This is achieved through various strategies such as utilizing energy-efficient production processes, sourcing materials locally to reduce transportation emissions, and using renewable energy sources [50]. By reducing their carbon footprint, these products help mitigate climate change, preserve natural resources, and promote a more sustainable and environmentally responsible lifestyle [49]. Choosing products with a low carbon footprint allows consumers to make environmentally conscious choices and contribute to a greener and more sustainable future.
- Carbon neutral: The “carbon neutral” feature indicates that the emissions generated throughout products’ lifecycles have been effectively offset or balanced by supporting projects that reduce or capture an equivalent amount of greenhouse gases [51]. Carbon neutrality is achieved by implementing measures to minimize emissions during production, transportation, and disposal, and then offsetting the remaining emissions through activities like reforestation, investing in renewable energy projects, or supporting carbon capture and storage initiatives [52]. By being carbon neutral, these products have a net-zero impact on greenhouse gas emissions, making them environmentally responsible choices [51]. Supporting carbon neutrality in product development helps combat climate change, fosters a more sustainable economy, and encourages a shift towards a low-carbon future [52]. Choosing carbon-neutral products allows consumers to make a positive environmental impact and contribute to global climate action [52].
- Ethically sourced: The “ethically sourced” feature focuses on ensuring that the raw materials used in products’ production are obtained in a socially and environmentally responsible manner [53]. Ethically sourced products prioritize fair trade, respect for human rights, and adherence to labor standards throughout the supply chain [54]. This includes fair wages, safe working conditions, and the prohibition of child labor or exploitation [54]. By choosing ethically sourced products, consumers can support companies that prioritize social equity, worker well-being, and environmental stewardship [53]. Ethical sourcing promotes transparency, accountability, and sustainable practices, making it an essential aspect of sustainable product selection [21].
- Water conservation: The “water conservation” feature aims to minimize water usage and promote responsible water management throughout the product lifecycle [55]. Products designed with water conservation in mind employ strategies such as efficient water use, water-saving technologies, and responsible manufacturing processes that reduce water waste and pollution [56]. By minimizing water consumption, these products help alleviate water scarcity, preserve freshwater ecosystems, and protect this vital resource for future generations. Additionally, water conservation in product design encourages consumer awareness and responsible water usage, fostering a more sustainable and environmentally conscious mindset [56]. Choosing products with a water conservation feature allows individuals to contribute to water sustainability and promote a more water-efficient society.
- Non-toxic: The “non-toxic” feature ensures that products are free from harmful substances and pose minimal risks to human health and the environment [57]. Non-toxic products are designed and manufactured using materials that do not contain toxic chemicals or pollutants, including heavy metals, harmful solvents, or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [58]. By prioritizing non-toxic ingredients and materials, these products minimize the potential for adverse health effects, allergies, or pollution during production, use, and disposal [57]. Choosing non-toxic products promotes a safer living environment, reduces the burden on ecosystems, and supports sustainable consumption practices [57]. Furthermore, non-toxic products often undergo rigorous testing and certification processes to provide consumers with assurance regarding their safety and environmental impact [58].
- Cruelty-free: The “cruelty-free” feature indicates that products have been developed without any involvement or harm to animals throughout their production process [59]. Cruelty-free products are not tested on animals and do not contain ingredients derived from animals or animal by-products [60]. By choosing cruelty-free products, consumers can support ethical and compassionate practices in the beauty, personal care, and household industries [60]. This feature promotes the well-being and rights of animals, encourages the development of alternative testing methods, and contributes to the overall shift towards more ethical and sustainable choices [59]. Additionally, cruelty-free products often carry certifications or labels from reputable organizations, providing transparency and assurance to consumers seeking animal-friendly options [60].
- Upcycled: The “upcycled” feature is a significant attribute of sustainable products, indicating that they have been created by repurposing or transforming waste materials into new and valuable items [61]. Upcycling is a process that diverts materials from landfill and reduces the need for new resource extraction. By upcycling, products can give new life to materials that would otherwise be discarded, contributing to waste reduction and resource conservation [61,62]. Upcycled products showcase creativity and innovation in design, highlighting the potential for transforming waste into unique and functional items [62]. Choosing upcycled products promotes a circular economy mindset and supports sustainable production practices that minimize waste and maximize the value of existing resources.
- Locally produced: The “locally produced” feature emphasizes products’ origin from nearby sources, typically within a specific geographic region [63]. Locally produced products support local economies, reduce carbon emissions associated with long-distance transportation, and promote community resilience [64]. By choosing locally produced items, consumers can contribute to the vitality of their local communities and support local artisans, farmers, and businesses. Furthermore, local production often involves shorter supply chains, allowing for better transparency, traceability, and a closer connection between consumers and producers [64,65]. This feature encourages sustainable consumption by fostering a sense of place, reducing environmental impact, and strengthening local economies [63].
- Social impact: The “social impact” feature highlights products’ positive influence on society and communities. Products with a focus on social impact contribute to social welfare, equality, and empowerment [66]. They may support fair trade practices, provide employment opportunities for marginalized groups, or invest a portion of their profits in social initiatives [32,34]. By choosing products with a social impact, consumers can align their purchasing power with their values and actively support positive change in society [67]. These products often go beyond profit-driven motives and strive to create a lasting, positive difference in the lives of individuals and communities, making them an integral part of the sustainable product landscape [67].
- Low/zero VOC: The “low/zero VOC” indicates that products contain minimal or no volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [68]. VOCs are chemicals that can be released into the air and contribute to indoor and outdoor air pollution, posing risks to human health and the environment [68]. Low/zero VOC products prioritize the use of non-toxic or low-emission materials, such as paints, adhesives, and cleaning products [58]. By choosing low/zero VOC products, consumers can create healthier indoor environments, reduce their exposure to harmful chemicals, and contribute to improved air quality [69]. This feature aligns with sustainable practices that prioritize human well-being and environmental stewardship [21].
2.2. Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) Models and Natural Language Processing (NLP)
2.2.1. Transformer Architecture
2.2.2. The Pre-Training Phase
2.2.3. The Fine-Tuning Phase
2.2.4. Prompts in GPT Models
2.2.5. Natural Language Processing (NLP)
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Objectives
Expected Outcomes and Benefits
- Enhanced Consumer Empowerment: The GPT-powered software will empower consumers to make more informed and sustainable purchasing decisions effortlessly. By automatically extracting sustainability indicators from product descriptions, titles, and product specifications, consumers will have access to crucial environmental and ethical information at their fingertips, enabling them to align their purchasing choices with their sustainability values.
- Time and Resource Savings: The automated sustainability assessment through the GPT-powered software will streamline the evaluation process for consumers and businesses alike. The software will eliminate the need for time-consuming and labor-intensive manual assessments, saving valuable resources and allowing businesses to allocate their efforts to other sustainability initiatives.
- Environmentally Conscious Business Practices: The proposed approach will encourage businesses to showcase and prioritize their environmentally friendly offerings. By providing automated sustainability classifications for products, the software will motivate businesses to adopt sustainable practices, ultimately contributing to a more eco-conscious market.
3.2. Methodology
3.2.1. Data Collection and Preprocessing
- Data Collection: For the purpose of this research, we utilized the most well-known marketplaces, namely Amazon, eBay, and AliExpress, as reference points. From each of these marketplaces, we collected a total of 30 randomly selected products, spanning across 6 distinct product categories. Care was be taken to cover various industries and product categories to ensure the software’s and GPT model’s applicability across different domains.
- Data Cleaning: Raw text data often contain noise, irrelevant information, or typographical errors. Data cleaning involved removing special characters, punctuation, and irrelevant tags or metadata. Additionally, any duplicated or redundant entries were eliminated to enhance data quality.
- Text Normalization: Text normalization is crucial to standardize the data, ensuring consistency in word representations. This step involves converting all text to lowercase, handling contractions, and applying stemming or lemmatization techniques to reduce words to their base form.
- Tokenization: The process of tokenization breaks down the textual data into individual tokens (words or subwords). Tokenization is a critical step for language models like GPT, as it allows the software to process and understand text at a granular level.
- Feature Extraction: Relevant features related to sustainability, such as “eco-friendly materials,” “energy efficiency,” “recyclability,” and “ethical sourcing,” will be identified and extracted from the preprocessed text. This step is vital to building a robust classification model that can differentiate products based on their sustainability characteristics.
- Software assessments: With the GPT-powered Chrome app activated, we accessed the webpage of each product, and the application was tasked with extracting the product title, description, and available product specifications, as applicable. Subsequently, the collected data were transmitted to a remote server, which established communication with the appropriate GPT model, soliciting responses concerning the sustainability features of the product based on its title and description. The resulting outcomes were stored in a CSV file to facilitate further analysis. A comprehensive description of this process can be found in Section 4.2, titled “Software Implementation and System Design.” The sample products and software’s assessments are readily available in CSV format on GitHub repository [91].
3.2.2. Model Evaluation
4. Experimental Setup and Results
4.1. User Interaction
4.2. Software Implementation and System Design
- The user proceeds with the installation of the Chrome app on the Google Chrome browser, utilizing the extensions area in developer mode;
- The user navigates through one of the prominent marketplaces/e-commerces, such as Amazon, and arrives at a product page;
- The background-running Chrome app detects the user’s presence on a product page and utilizes JavaScript and JQuery to extract the title, description, and characteristics of the product;
- Through Ajax, the Chrome app initiates an asynchronous POST request to a remote server;
- The server employs Flask [98], a micro Python-based framework, to handle the incoming POST request from the Chrome app;
- Python is responsible for loading the OpenAI library and generating an appropriate prompt containing the title and description of the product observed by the user;
- Upon receiving the response from the OpenAI API, Python undertakes the processing of the response data and formats them in a manner suitable for the Chrome app to interpret. These formatted data are then returned to the Chrome APP;
- Depending on the response, the Chrome app asynchronously displays a badge on the page being viewed by the user. On mouse hover, a popup message appears, presenting text that elucidates the sustainable attributes identified by the GPT for the product. In the scenario where no sustainable attributes are detected, a distinct badge is printed on the page, which, upon hover, notifies the user that no sustainable attributes were found for the specific product.
4.3. Case Studies and Examples
4.3.1. Case Study 1
4.3.2. Case Study 2
4.4. Results
4.4.1. Hypothesis 1
- Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant accuracy in GPT model responses when appropriate prompts are utilized.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The GPT model produces accurate responses when appropriate prompts are employed.
4.4.2. Hypothesis 2
- Null Hypothesis (H0): The responses produced by the GPT model do not conform to the appropriate format.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The format of GPT model responses is accurate and aligns with the explicitly defined structure in the prompt.
4.4.3. Hypothesis 3
- Null Hypothesis (H0): The GPT model is unable to identify sustainable features of a product when given its title and description.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The GPT model is capable of evaluating the sustainable features of a product when provided with its title and description.
4.4.4. Hypothesis 4
- Null Hypothesis (H0): The GPT model is incapable of identifying product sustainable features when confronted with limited or less descriptive product titles and descriptions.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The GPT model can successfully retrieve sustainable features of a product even when the provided title and description lack sufficient descriptive information.
5. Discussion
5.1. Application of Findings and Future Research Directions
5.2. Software Limitations and Challenges
- Prompt-related issues: To achieve the desired outcome described in Section 4.2, numerous attempts were made to find the appropriate prompt that would guide the GPT model in understanding the required actions. For instance, despite prompting the model to evaluate the product based on specific attributes, it would still generate its own assessments for attributes not provided as options. This problem was resolved by refining the prompt.
- Efforts were also devoted to handling the responses returned by the OpenAI API. After each response, the API provided multiple choices, with each choice containing fragmented answers due to token limitations. By refining the prompt and providing the exact expected format of the result, the answers became more accurate. However, the presence of multiple choices continued to complicate the extraction of results.
- At present, the software is fully functional with the Amazon marketplace, which has well-structured source code using CSS classes and IDs. In contrast, in similar attempts on eBay, it proved almost impossible to extract product descriptions using JavaScript, as the eBay rich description operates on iframe technology. This issue can be addressed by accessing the product information through the official APIs provided by the marketplaces instead of relying on JavaScript-based extraction.
5.3. Ethical Considerations
5.4. Chrome Extensions and APPs in Similar Contexts
6. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Litvaj, I.; Ponisciakova, O.; Stancekova, D.; Svobodova, J.; Mrazik, J. Decision-Making Procedures and Their Relation to Knowledge Management and Quality Management. Sustainability 2022, 14, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, M.A. Sustainability: I know it when I see it. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86, 213–217. [Google Scholar]
- Rondinelli, D.A.; Berry, M.A. Environmental citizenship in multinational corporations: Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. Eur. Manag. J. 2000, 18, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purvis, B.; Mao, Y.; Robinson, D. Three pillars of sustainability: In Search of Conceptual Origins. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 14, 681–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clark, G.; Kosoris, J.; Hong, L.N.; Crul, M. Design for Sustainability: Current Trends in Sustainable Product Design and Development. Sustainability 2009, 1, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindan, K. How artificial intelligence drives sustainable frugal innovation: A multitheoretical perspective. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2022, 99, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peráček, T. E-Commerce and Its Limits in the Context of the Consumer Protection: The Case of the SLOVAK Republic. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359721780_E-commerce_and_its_limits_in_the_context_of_the_consumer_protection_the_case_of_the_Slovak_Republic (accessed on 25 July 2023).
- Klimek, L.; Funta, R. Data and e-commerce: An economic relationship. Danube 2021, 12, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, N.; Kumar, A. Deepika store: A dilemma of being sustainable or profitable. In Socially Responsible Consumption and Marketing in Practice; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 113–129. [Google Scholar]
- Gashi, F.; Peci, B. Protection of Personal Data and Privacy in Banking Sector in Kosovo and Its Impact in Consumer Protection. Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative. Soc. Jurid. Adm. Sci. 2020, 9, 70–78. [Google Scholar]
- Purcărea, T.; Ioan-Franc, V.; Ionescu, Ş.-A.; Purcărea, I.M.; Purcărea, V.L.; Purcărea, I.; Mateescu-Soare, M.C.; Platon, O.-E.; Orzan, A.-O. Major Shifts in Sustainable Consumer Behavior in Romania and Retailers’ Priorities in Agilely Adapting to It. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redondo, R.; Valor, C.; Carrero, I. Unraveling the relationship between well-being, sustainable consumption and nature relatedness: A study of university students. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2021, 17, 913–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Li, X.; Huang, P.; Wang, J. Exploring the Road toward Environmental Sustainability: Natural Resources, Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taghvaee, V.M.; Nodehi, M.; Arani, A.A.; Jafari, Y.; Shirazi, J.K. Sustainability spillover effects of social, environment and Economy: Mapping Global Sustainable Development in a systematic analysis. Asia-Pac. J. Reg. Sci. 2022, 7, 329–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.-W. Guidance on the Conceptual Design of Sustainable Product–Service Systems. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cvijanović, D.; Ignjatijević, S.; Vapa Tankosić, J.; Cvijanović, V. Do Local Food Products Contribute to Sustainable Economic Development? Sustainability 2020, 12, 2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, M.; Huang, H.; Ma, W. Transformation of natural resource use: Moving towards Sustainability through ICT-based improvements in Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency. Resour. Policy 2023, 80, 103228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Chen, H.; Long, R.; Yang, J. How does government regulation shape residents’ green consumption behavior? A multi-agent simulation considering environmental values and social interaction. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 331, 117231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, L.; Xu, Z.; Skare, M. Sustainable Business Model Innovation Literature: A bibliometrics analysis. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2022, 17, 757–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinagi, C.; Trivellas, P.; Sakas, D.P. The impact of information technology on the development of Supply Chain Competitive Advantage. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 147, 586–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andersson, S.; Svensson, G.; Otero-Neira, C.; Laurell, H.; Lindgren, J.; Karlsson, N.P. Sustainable development considerations in supply chains: Firms’ relationships with stakeholders in their business sustainability practices—A triangular comparison. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 32, 1885–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharif, A.; Kartal, M.T.; Bekun, F.V.; Pata, U.K.; Foon, C.L.; Kılıç Depren, S. Role of Green Technology, environmental taxes, and green energy towards sustainable environment: Insights from Sovereign Nordic countries by CS-ARDL approach. Gondwana Res. 2023, 117, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, E. From Neglect to Progress: Assessing Social Sustainability and Decent Work in the Tourism Sector. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.-C.; Lou, R.; Wang, F. Digital Financial Inclusion and poverty alleviation: Evidence from the Sustainable Development of China. Econ. Anal. Policy 2023, 77, 418–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziaul, I.M.; Shuwei, W. Environmental sustainability: A major component of Sustainable Development. Int. J. Environ. Sustain. Soc. Sci. 2023, 4, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Sustainable Development. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ (accessed on 4 July 2023).
- Tsakiridou, E.; Boutsouki, C.; Zotos, Y.; Mattas, K. Attitudes and behaviour towards organic products: An exploratory study. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2008, 36, 158–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darnhofer, I.; Lindenthal, T.; Bartel-Kratochvil, R.; Zollitsch, W. Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: From structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sogari, G.; Mora, C.; Menozzi, D. Factors driving sustainable choice: The case of wine. Br. Food J. 2016, 118, 632–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Courville, S. Organic standards and certification. In Organic Agriculture: A Global Perspective; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2006; pp. 201–219. [Google Scholar]
- Barrett, H.R.; Browne, A.W.; Harris, P.J.C.; Cadoret, K. Organic certification and the UK market: Organic imports from developing countries. Food Policy 2002, 27, 301–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, G. The Fair Trade Movement: Parameters, issues and future research. J. Bus. Ethics 2004, 53, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Renard, M.-C. Quality certification, regulation and power in Fair Trade. J. Rural Stud. 2005, 21, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Getz, C.; Shreck, A. What organic and fair trade labels do not tell us: Towards a place-based understanding of Certification. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2006, 30, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hummen, T.; Sudheshwar, A. Fitness of product and service design for closed-loop material recycling: A Framework and indicator. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190, 106661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donatelli, A.; Casciaro, G.; Schioppa, M.; Palazzo, B.; Scalone, A.G.; Valentino, F.; Capodieci, L.; De Pascalis, F.; Nacucchi, M.; Caretto, F. Thermoforming, characterization, and in-house recycling of multi-layered laminated composites made with polyamide 6/recycled carbon fibers hybrid yarns-based plain weave fabrics. J. Compos. Mater. 2023. online first. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, M.; Chen, E.Y.-X. Chemically recyclable polymers: A circular economy approach to sustainability. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3692–3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rusmevichientong, P.; Sumida, M.; Topaloglu, H. Dynamic assortment optimization for reusable products with random usage durations. Manag. Sci. 2020, 66, 2820–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeghi, A.H.; Bani, E.A.; Fallahi, A.; Handfield, R. Grey Wolf optimizer and whale optimization algorithm for stochastic inventory management of Reusable Products in a two-level supply chain. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 40278–40297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dilanchiev, A.; Nuta, F.; Khan, I.; Khan, H. Urbanization, renewable energy production, and carbon dioxide emission in BSEC member states: Implications for climate change mitigation and energy markets. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 67338–67350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Sadiq, M.; Chien, F. The impact of non-renewable energy production and energy usage on carbon emissions: Evidence from China. Energy Environ. 2023. online first. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akroush, M.N.; Zuriekat, M.I.; Al Jabali, H.I.; Asfour, N.A. Determinants of purchasing intentions of energy-efficient products. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2019, 13, 128–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, H.; Janda, S. Predicting consumer intentions to purchase energy-efficient products. J. Consum. Mark. 2012, 29, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svanes, E.; Vold, M.; Møller, H.; Pettersen, M.K.; Larsen, H.; Hanssen, O.J. Sustainable Packaging Design: A holistic methodology for packaging design. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2010, 23, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boz, Z.; Korhonen, V.; Koelsch Sand, C. Consumer Considerations for the Implementation of Sustainable Packaging: A Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beiras, R.; López-Ibáñez, S. A Practical Tool for the Assessment of Polymer Biodegradability in Marine Environments Guides the Development of Truly Biodegradable Plastics. Polymers 2023, 15, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paul-Pont, I.; Ghiglione, J.-F.; Gastaldi, E.; Ter Halle, A.; Huvet, A.; Bruzaud, S.; Lagarde, F.; Galgani, F.; Duflos, G.; George, M.; et al. Discussion about suitable applications for biodegradable plastics regarding their sources, uses and end of life. Waste Manag. 2023, 157, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, D.; Jaisankar, R.; Murugesan, V.; Suvitha, K.; Narayanamoorthy, S.; Omar, A.H.; Arshad, N.I.; Ahmadian, A. A novel MCDM approach to selecting a biodegradable dynamic plastic product: A probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set-based COPRAS method. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 340, 117967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sale, L.; Beattie, G. Explicit and implicit attitudes to low and high carbon footprint products. Int. J. Environ. Cult. Econ. Soc. Sustain. Annu. Rev. 2009, 5, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, B.; Li, B.; Zhu, X. Carbon footprint prediction method for linkage mechanism design. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 60150–60167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Solangi, Y.A.; Ali, S. Evaluating the Factors of Green Finance to Achieve Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality Targets in China: A Delphi and Fuzzy AHP Approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birkenberg, A.; Narjes, M.E.; Weinmann, B.; Birner, R. The potential of carbon neutral labeling to engage coffee consumers in climate change mitigation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mboga, J. Ethical sourcing to ensure sustainability in the food and beverage industry and eliciting millennial perspectives. Eur. J. Econ. Financ. Res. 2017, 2, 222. [Google Scholar]
- Stamboulakis, D.; Sanderson, J. Certifying biodiversity: The Union for Ethical Biotrade and the search for ethical sourcing. J. Environ. Law 2020, 32, 503–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goula, A.M.; Adamopoulos, K.G. A method for preparing a novel solid product from Olive Mill Wastewater: Wastewater characterization and Product Recovery. Dry. Technol. 2013, 31, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, F.; Zhang, H.; Dang, C.; Gong, X. A novel framework for water accounting and auditing for efficient management of Industrial Water Use. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 395, 136458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, H.J.; Ahn, M.; Kang, J. The Effects of Knowledge Types on Consumer Decision Making for Non-Toxic Housing Materials and Products. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agostini, V.O.; Macedo, A.J.; Muxagata, E.; da Silva, M.V.; Pinho, G.L. Natural and non-toxic products from Fabaceae Brazilian plants as a replacement for traditional antifouling biocides: An inhibition potential against initial biofouling. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 27112–27127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sheehan, K.B.; Lee, J. What’s cruel about cruelty free: An exploration of consumers, moral heuristics, and public policy. J. Anim. Ethics 2014, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grappe, C.G.; Lombart, C.; Louis, D.; Durif, F. “Not tested on animals”: How consumers react to cruelty-free cosmetics proposed by manufacturers and retailers? Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2021, 49, 1532–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Lee, J. The Effects of Consumers’ Perceived Values on Intention to Purchase Upcycled Products. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adıgüzel, F.; Donato, C. Proud to be sustainable: Upcycled versus recycled luxury products. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 130, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jekanowski, M.D.; Williams, D.R.; Schiek, W.A. Consumers’ willingness to purchase locally produced agricultural products: An analysis of an Indiana survey. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2000, 29, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wägeli, S.; Janssen, M.; Hamm, U. Organic consumers’ preferences and willingness-to-pay for locally produced animal products. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2015, 40, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakas, D.P.; Giannakopoulos, N.T.; Nasiopoulos, D.K.; Kanellos, N.; Tsoulfas, G.T. Assessing the Efficacy of Cryptocurrency Applications’ Affiliate Marketing Process on Supply Chain Firms’ Website Visibility. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benoit-Norris, C.; Cavan, D.A.; Norris, G. Identifying Social Impacts in Product Supply Chains: Overview and Application of the Social Hotspot Database. Sustainability 2012, 4, 1946–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Norris, G.A. Social impacts in product life cycles—Towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2006, 11, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schieweck, A.; Bock, M.-C. Emissions from low-voc and zero-VOC paints—Valuable alternatives to conventional formulations also for use in sensitive environments? Build. Environ. 2015, 85, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, G.V.; Martins, A.O.; Martins, S.D.S.; Mata, T.M. Low-VOC Emission Label Proposal for Facemask Safety Based on Respiratory and Skin Health Criteria. Environments 2023, 10, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.-H.; Lin, G.-Y. Exploring AI-Healthcare Innovation: Natural Language Processing-based patents analysis for technology-driven roadmapping. Kybernetes 2022, 52, 1173–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roumeliotis, K.I.; Tselikas, N.D. ChatGPT and Open-AI Models: A Preliminary Review. Future Internet 2023, 15, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A.N.; Kaiser, L.; Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1706.03762. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, Z.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Carbonell, J.G.; Le, Q.V.; Salakhutdinov, R. Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models beyond a Fixed-Length Context. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy, 28 July–2 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Yu, X.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Z.; Cao, C.; Dai, H.; Zhao, L.; Liu, W.; Shen, D.; Li, Q.; et al. Deid-GPT: Zero-shot medical text de-identification by GPT-4. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.11032. [Google Scholar]
- Topal, M.O.; Bas, A.; van Heerden, I. Exploring transformers in natural language generation: GPT, Bert, and xlnet. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2102.08036. [Google Scholar]
- Ray, P.P. CHATGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2023, 3, 121–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maréchal, N. Overview of Game-Changing CHATGPT: Ai Power to Be Feared or Embraced? Available online: https://hospitalityinsights.ehl.edu/chatgpt-overview (accessed on 27 July 2023).
- Kheiri, K.; Karimi, H. Sentimentgpt: Exploiting GPT for advanced sentiment analysis and its departure from current machine learning. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2307.10234. [Google Scholar]
- Troya, A.; Gopalakrishna Pillai, R.; Rodriguez Rivero, D.C.; Genc, D.Z.; Kayal, D.S.; Araci, D. Aspect-based sentiment analysis of social media data with pre-trained language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval (NLPIR), Sanya, China, 17–20 December 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Rothman, D. Transformers For Natural Language Processing Build, Train, and Fine-Tune Deep Neural Network Architectures for NLP with Python, Pytorch, Tensorflow, Bert, and GPT-3; Packt: Birmingham, UK, 2022; ISSN 9781803247335. [Google Scholar]
- Morocho Cayamcela, M.E.; Lim, W. Fine-tuning a pre-trained convolutional neural network model to translate American sign language in real-time. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), Honolulu, HI, USA, 18–21 February 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Han, T.; Ma, S.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Tian, J.; He, H.; Li, A.; He, M.; Liu, Z.; et al. Summary of CHATGPT/GPT-4 research and perspective towards the future of large language models. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2304.01852. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, S.; Mahmood, A. The NLP cookbook: Modern recipes for Transformer based Deep Learning Architectures. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 68675–68702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Li, J. A commentary of GPT-3 in MIT Technology Review 2021. Fundam. Res. 2021, 1, 831–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Floridi, L.; Chiriatti, M. GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds Mach. 2020, 30, 681–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Si, C.; Gan, Z.; Yang, Z.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Boyd-Graber, J.; Wang, L. Prompting GPT-3 to be reliable. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2210.09150. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Jin, P. A brief summary of prompting in using GPT Models. Qeios 2023. preprint. [Google Scholar]
- Møller, A.G.; Dalsgaard, J.A.; Pera, A.; Aiello, L.M. Is a prompt and a few samples all you need? Using GPT-4 for data augmentation in low-resource classification tasks. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2304.13861. [Google Scholar]
- Hirschle, J. Transformers. Deep Natural Language Processing; O’Reilly Media Inc.: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2022; pp. 207–232. [Google Scholar]
- de Curtò, J.; de Zarzà, I.; Calafate, C.T. Semantic Scene Understanding with Large Language Models on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Drones 2023, 7, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Software Github—A GPT-Powered Software for Identifying Sustainable Product Features. Available online: https://github.com/rkonstadinos/gpt-sustainable-products-chrome-app (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- Pandas Library. Available online: https://pandas.pydata.org/ (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- Matplotlib Library. Available online: https://matplotlib.org/ (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- Chrome Extensions Getting Started Guides. Available online: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/getstarted/ (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- OpenAI API. Available online: https://openai.com/blog/openai-api (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- LLP, P. Host, Run, and Code Python in the Cloud! Available online: https://www.pythonanywhere.com/ (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- Anaconda Acquires Pythonanywhere. Available online: https://www.anaconda.com/blog/anaconda-acquires-pythonanywhere (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- Flask’s Documentation. Available online: https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/2.3.x/ (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- OpenAI Models. Available online: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/overview (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- How Do Text-DAVINCI-002 and Text-DAVINCI-003 Differ? Available online: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6779149-how-do-text-davinci-002-and-text-davinci-003-differ (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- GPT-4 OpenAI Model. Available online: https://openai.com/gpt-4 (accessed on 5 July 2023).
- Ali, M.N.; Rahman, M.L.; Chaki, J.; Dey, N.; Santosh, K.C. Machine translation using Deep Learning for Universal Networking language based on their structure. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2021, 12, 2365–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Roumeliotis, K.I.; Tselikas, N.D.; Nasiopoulos, D.K. Unveiling Sustainability in Ecommerce: GPT-Powered Software for Identifying Sustainable Product Features. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512015
Roumeliotis KI, Tselikas ND, Nasiopoulos DK. Unveiling Sustainability in Ecommerce: GPT-Powered Software for Identifying Sustainable Product Features. Sustainability. 2023; 15(15):12015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512015
Chicago/Turabian StyleRoumeliotis, Konstantinos I., Nikolaos D. Tselikas, and Dimitrios K. Nasiopoulos. 2023. "Unveiling Sustainability in Ecommerce: GPT-Powered Software for Identifying Sustainable Product Features" Sustainability 15, no. 15: 12015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512015
APA StyleRoumeliotis, K. I., Tselikas, N. D., & Nasiopoulos, D. K. (2023). Unveiling Sustainability in Ecommerce: GPT-Powered Software for Identifying Sustainable Product Features. Sustainability, 15(15), 12015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512015