Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Literature Review of Research on Social Procurement in the Construction and Infrastructure Sector: Barriers, Enablers, and Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Land Surface Temperature from the Indian Cities of Ranchi and Dhanbad during COVID-19 Lockdown: Implications on the Urban Climatology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 15
Issue 17
10.3390/su151712960
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High School Students’ Perceptions of the Role of Social Support in Cultivating Their Interests in and Aspirations to STEM Degrees and Careers—A Middle Eastern Case Study

by
Abdellatif Sellami
1,*,
Malavika E. Santhosh
2,
Nitha Siby
2,
Jolly Bhadra
2 and
Zubair Ahmad
2,*
1
Educational Research Center, College of Education, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
2
Qatar University Young Scientists Center (QUYSC), Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(17), 12960; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712960
Submission received: 21 June 2023 / Revised: 23 July 2023 / Accepted: 1 August 2023 / Published: 28 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Education and Approaches)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This case study intends to comprehend students’ perceptions of social support in cultivating their interests and aspirations for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (STEM) degrees and careers. Survey-based quantitative research was employed, incorporating data from 1426 high school (grade 11th–12th) students in Qatar. The survey instrument encompassed four dimensions, i.e., (1) participants’ demographics, (2) STEM interests, (3) STEM supports/barriers and (4) STEM career aspirations to understand students’ perceptions. Spearman’s Rho correlation test demonstrated a positive correlation between students’ perceived social support (from family, teachers, and society) and their STEM interests (p < 0.01). Findings from the Mann-Whitney U test illustrated that females perceived enhanced social support (from teachers and society) in Qatar (p < 0.05). Even though teachers and society have been the stimulus to developing students’ STEM interests, there is still room to implement a policy for the consequential influence in constructing students’ STEM career aspirations. Thus, we believe these findings would urge policymakers to design tools that enable teachers and society to nurture, cultivate and sustain interest in STEM among the youth to meet Qatar’s National Vision 2030.

1. Introduction

Science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (STEM) education have been identified as crucial catalysts for fostering key critical thinking skills for tackling the world’s economic, environmental, health, social, and many other problems today [1,2]. Prominent among these are the skills of problem-solving, logical thinking, deduction, interpretation, reasoning, and self-introspection skills [3]. These skills are achievable by teaching STEM from a multidimensional and interdisciplinary perspective that can make STEM subjects more relevant to teachers and students, ensuring sustainable education in STEM [1,2]. Despite the great demand for qualified individuals with adequate STEM skills and knowledge, there has been a substantial decline in the number of students interested in STEM majors and careers [4]. Thus, many developed countries across the globe have raised concerns over the paucity of STEM-literate people, urging educators, educational institutions, researchers, and others to address this leaky STEM pipeline [5]. A systematic review by Kayan-Fadlelmula et al., 2022 based on the research articles of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states, has showcased the scarcity of STEM professionals in Qatar based on the indicators of enrollment in STEM-based education and careers [5].
Since around the late 20th century, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have channeled significant investments in education reforms, making the education sector topping the list of policy agendas as a fundamental pillar of the country’s socio-economic prosperity [6]. Qatar, for example, has taken bold steps to transition to a knowledge-based economy, thereby intensifying the need to build a highly skilled national capacity capable of addressing modern society’s challenges. Qatar has invested in information, communication & technology (ICT), education, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Despite successive educational reforms emphasizing the need to enhance student recruitment, persistence, and retention in STEM study programs, the scarcity of STEM professionals is in evidence [6,7].
The primary rationale behind this study is that Qatar’s Ministry of Development Planning and Statistics report indicates that students graduating with a university degree in non-STEM disciplines in 2020–2021 outnumbered those graduating with STEM degrees [8]. Since this discrepancy in STEM and non-STEM graduates can have serious ramifications for the country’s economic development, it is imperative to identify and comprehend the factors affecting STEM interests and career aspirations among the youth. The present study sought to explore whether different social support factors impact high school students’ interests and career aspirations in STEM in Qatar and, by extension, other countries in the GCC and the broader Arab region. Because high school is a critical stage for nurturing STEM career interests [9], we drew on existing literature to design our survey of high school students’ perceptions of the role of social support in promoting their STEM interests and career aspirations. Therefore, the paper’s primary objective is to explore the high school students’ perceptions of social support (from their families, teachers, and society) for cultivating their STEM interests. Also, to observe if there exists any relationship between students’ perceived support from family, teachers, and society and their likelihood of choosing STEM careers. Conclusively, this article aims to enhance STEM literacy by comprehending the impact of social support, considering the intersection of STEM education and sustainable education.

1.1. Review of Literature and Conceptual Framework

STEM-related learning and career orientation implicate a complex phenomenon that involves myriad underlying influences, such as personal (age, gender, grade, nationality, etc.), motivational (self-efficacy, performance, interests, confidence, expectation, etc.), and environmental (school-related factors such as teachers’ support, pedagogical approach, support from parents/peers/society, etc.) [10]. Previous literature reveals that support from the family, peers, teachers, and society plays a pivotal role in shaping students’ STEM interests and STEM career trajectories [11,12]. The overall impact of parents, peers, teachers, and school-related factors has been found to enhance students’ academic outcomes [13,14] and, specifically, affect their achievement in math and science [15,16]. Support and encouragement from the family are depicted as significant moderators affecting children’s science interests, especially regarding the interactions between parents and their children [17,18].
Similarly, support from teachers is another crucial determinant of STEM interests and aspirations among young adolescents. Support and guidance from teachers are regarded as critical factors that promote students’ STEM learning and STEM interests. Many studies have shown the potential influence teachers can have in shaping students’ STEM interests [19,20]. The quality of the teacher is reported to be strongly correlated to the student’s achievement [21,22], which is measured by students’ outlook toward teacher-adopted instructional practices [23,24], and teacher-mediated encouragement [25]. Likewise, support from society and its impact on cultivating STEM interests and aspirations of students is an area that remains largely underexplored. Indeed, the Middle East is a region where social norms and cultural values affect various aspects of education and career choices. In this study, we intended to comprehend societal support in molding students’ attitudes and aspirations in Qatar [26,27,28,29].
Insights into high school students’ perceptions of social support in the context of Qatar are somewhat limited, calling for close attention to this area. Therefore, the current study sought to fill this gap in the literature by conducting a quantitative survey of STEM-related interests and career aspirations -based on the views and opinions of public and private high school students in Qatar. The STEM interest has been described in this article via the variables of performance and confidence in STEM. The conceptual model of this study is based on the previous literature that intended to illustrate the impact of social support on secondary students’ STEM interests and career aspirations [8,11,12,13]. Based on the aforementioned literature, the perception of students’ STEM interests and careers has been studied by investigating the dimensions of (1) participants’ demographics, (2) STEM interests, (3) STEM supports/barriers, and (4) STEM career aspirations.

1.2. Theoretical Framework

Most of the studies exploring the influence of social support on students’ STEM interests and aspirations have drawn on the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Lent et al., 1994, 2000) [30,31] and Eccles’ Expectancy Value Theory (EVT; Eccles et al., 1983) [32]. SCCT ascribes career aspirations to an assortment of factors, including individual (personal factors), environmental (social factors), and motivational factors (behavioral factors). Using SCCT as a theoretical model, this study hypothesizes that social agents such as parents, teachers, and society tend to influence students’ STEM interests and career aspirations [14]. The second model, Eccles’ Expectancy Value Model, postulates that parents’ beliefs affect children’s motivation and performance [33]. Aligned with the goals of our study, both the SCCT and the EVT provided a framework guiding this study’s research questions.
  • RQ 1: Do high school students perceive their families, teachers, and society as support or a barrier to cultivating their STEM interests?
  • RQ 2: What is the correlation between students’ perceived support from family, teachers, and society and their interest in STEM (if any)?
  • RQ 3: How do students’ perceived support from family, teachers, and society influence their likelihood of choosing STEM careers?

2. Materials and Methods

This study adopted a quantitative research approach to investigate the likely influence of social support in fostering high school students’ interests in and aspirations for STEM degrees and, eventually, a career in STEM fields. Data was collected via a survey instrument to gain insights into the STEM interests, STEM-related supports and/or barriers, and career aspirations of 11th and 12th-grade students in Qatar. Wherein the survey instrument encompassed four dimensions, i.e., (1) participants’ demographics, (2) STEM interests, (3) STEM supports/barriers, and (4) STEM career aspirations. The study specifically sought to explore the role of social support, especially from family, teachers, and other members of society, in shaping high school students’ STEM interests and career aspirations, as perceived by high school students in the context of Qatar.

2.1. Study Participants

The inclusion criteria of the survey participants involved the high school students of grades 11th and 12th of government and private schools in Qatar. Participants opting for STEM and non-STEM subjects in their higher secondary were included, which was further sorted according to the scope of the study. A high representativeness of the sample has been assured by including data from schools of all major cities in Qatar. Upon obtaining approval from the Qatar University Institutional Review Board (QU-IRB), school board superintendents and teachers were first contacted to make the necessary arrangements regarding the survey administration. Official letters requesting access to their respective schools for the researchers to gather students’ data in their schools. A total of 1426 high school students from Qatar participated in the study. Figure 1 demonstrates the percentage of students in government and private schools crossed per grade, gender, and nationality. It is also evident that a wide disparity in nationality has been observed due to expatriates accounting for 85% of Qatar’s population (Figure 1). Given the exploratory nature of the current study, a non-probability uncontrolled convenient sampling method was employed. The sampling process was completed when the sample and/or time saturation were attained. Table 1 shows the demographic distribution of students who participated in the survey by gender, nationality, type of school, and parental profession.

2.2. Survey Procedure

The survey was carried out in three phases: (1) survey formulation, (2) survey piloting, and (3) survey implementation. In the first phase of survey formulation, the researchers designed and developed the survey questions based on the existing literature [34,35] and aligned with Kier et al. (2014) framework on the STEM career interest survey [36]. The survey included a total of 24 items with response options provided in a 5-point Likert scale format under four dimensions: (1) demographics, (2) STEM interests, (3) STEM supports/barriers, and (4) STEM career aspirations (Figure S1).
Questions on students’ demographics included their gender, age, nationality, school, grade, subjects (STEM/Non-STEM), parents’ educational qualifications, and careers (Figure S1). Questions based on STEM interests and STEM supports/barriers were of the 5-point Likert scale type, with a range −2 to +2 coded as follows: −2 = “Strongly Disagree”, −1 = “Agree”, 0 = “Undecided”, 1 = “Agree”, and 2 = “Strongly Disagree”. The variables used to define STEM interest were performance, ability, and confidence in STEM. Similarly, under the STEM supports/barriers category, the variables investigated were the support from parents, society, and teachers. The questions about STEM career aspirations were nearly open-ended (Figure S1). Students’ responses were analyzed as 1 = “STEM career” and 2 = “non-STEM career” aspirations. The students’ responses were coded per the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-88). Binary coding (1 and 0) was applied for questions related to students’ gender (male, female), nationality (Qatari, Non-Qatari), majors (STEM, Non-STEM), the parent’s profession (STEM, Non-STEM), Grades (11, 12), etc.
The second phase involved piloting the survey, where the questions were tested with two focus groups, one in Arabic and the other in English. The focus group discussions assisted us in addressing concerns related to the wording of questions. Feedback from the focus groups helped alert the researchers to certain areas that needed revising, including the wording of some questions for clarity.
In the third phase of the survey implementation, the questionnaires were distributed to students. Before administering the survey, the relevant signed consent forms were collected from the students, teachers, and school authorities. Students took nearly 15 to 30 min to complete the survey. They responded in either English or Arabic, considering that students were enrolled in schools where the medium of instruction is either Arabic (public schools) or English (private schools), respectively. Responses in Arabic were later translated into English to facilitate hassle-free analysis.

2.3. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics software 29.0.0.0 (241). Firstly, reliability and validity have been established. Factor analysis (confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA)) has been measured to comprehend the data reliability, item quality, and construct validity. The general steps of factor analysis involved: assessing the suitability of the data, extracting the constructs, employing specific criteria to determine which factors should be removed, using a rotational method, and interpreting the results. EFA aids in building a structural model with items contributing to the constructs.
In contrast, CFA computes if the measures of a construct are coherent with a researcher’s understanding of that construct. For EFA, Kaiser Meyer Olkin’s value and Bartlett’s test of sphericity were computed. Likewise, CFA was calculated, considering the Root mean square of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square of residual (SRMR), and Tucker Lewis index (TLI). The survey model was then assessed for reliability. Indicator reliability has been calculated to examine how much of each indicator’s variance is justified by its construct. Cronbach’s Alpha and MacDonald’s omega reliability tests were assessed for internal consistency reliability. The construct validity, i.e., the convergent and discriminant validity of each construct, has been computed to understand the convergence and discrimination of the constructs for comprehending the variance of its indicators. The construct’s convergent validity is computed by the average variance extracted (AVE) for all indicators on each construct. Wherein the AVE is the mean value of the squared loadings of the indicators linked with the constructs. Discriminant validity was measured by the heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HTMT) of correlations. HTMT assesses the mean value of the indicator correlations across constructs relative to the mean of the average correlations for the indicators measuring the same construct.
Descriptive statistics and other relevant statistical tests (non-parametric) were computed for the overall analysis of the data based on the data evaluations according to the paper’s scope [34]. To address the first research question, descriptive statistics involving mean, standard deviation, and frequencies were calculated. This was employed to comprehend the percentage agreement and disagreement of students ’perception of support from the family, teachers, and society, followed by the Mann-Whitney test to investigate the divergences in male and female students’ perceptions of support from the family, society, and teachers. Social support was utilized as the dependent variable, and gender was the independent variable. For the second research question, Spearman’s Rho correlation test was employed to understand the relationship between social support (from the family, teachers, and society) and students’ interests in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Finally, bivariate logistic regression was performed to comprehend how students’ perceived social support is correlated with their likelihood to pursue STEM careers (addressing the third research question).

3. Results

3.1. Validation of the Instruments

EFA and CFA were measured to comprehend the data reliability, item quality, and construct validity. For EFA, Kaiser Meyer Olkin’s value of 0.934 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity (p < 0.05) were computed (acceptable). Likewise, CFA was calculated, and all the values were within the thresholds (i.e., RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.02, TLI = 0.91. The loading values ranged from 0.71 to 0.75 (acceptable). Indicator loadings of above 0.708 (acceptable value) have been computed. For internal consistency, Cronbach’s Alpha and MacDonald’s Omega values for each survey construct have been calculated and illustrated in Table 2. The Alpha and Omega values typically range from 0 to 1, with acceptable values greater than 0.7. The values above 0.70 are regarded as reliable, and above 0.8 as highly reliable. The reliability test revealed that all the questions used in analyzing this study’s data were reliable.
For the construct validity, i.e., the convergent and discriminant validity has been assessed. The convergent validity is computed by calculating the AVE for all indicators on each construct. The AVE of above 0.7 (acceptable value) has been computed. Discriminant validity was measured by the HTMT of correlations, and the value was 0.8 (acceptable value).
Furthermore, descriptive statistics and non-parametric analyses (the Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman’s Rho correlation, and bivariate logistic regression models) were computed per the research questions. The significance levels of 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 were considered in interpreting the results.

3.2. Research Findings

This study’s findings offer insights into the significant role of social support as a strong determinant in framing students’ interests in STEM degrees and career aspirations. The findings are presented in response to the study’s three research questions (RQs) to provide an understanding of the role of families, teachers, and society in defining the students’ interests in a STEM degree and a future STEM career.

3.2.1. RQ1: Do High School Students Perceive Their Families, Teachers, and Society as Support or a Barrier to Cultivating Their STEM Interests?

To see whether family, teachers, and society support or impede the cultivation of STEM interest among high school students, we coded the students’ responses as “positive beliefs”, “undecided”, and “negative beliefs”. The coding is graphically illustrated in Figure 2 below. Whereas nearly 79% of the students expressed positive beliefs regarding support from their family and society, 64.74% expressed positive beliefs regarding teachers’ support for cultivating their STEM interests.
Our results were further broken down to examine the likely relationship between the role of constructs attributed to positive beliefs and the role of family, society, and teachers. As Figure 3 demonstrates, the students’ positive outlooks on the role of the family in promoting their STEM pathways are associated with the three constructs of encouragement, conversation, and active participation, by the family. While 80.7% of the students agreed that their parents encourage them to follow STEM pathways, 76.3% indicated that their family engages in regular conversation about their activities in school. Concerning the role of parents’ active participation in STEM-based activities, our results yielded a mixed response. Looking at the students’ perceptions of support from society, the results indicated that the majority of students believe that Qatari society has a positive outlook on STEM pathways for both males (70.4%) and females (65.3%) (Figure 4). Our study’s results also revealed that students expressed positive beliefs that Qatari society promotes success stories of males (70.8%) and females (66.2%) in STEM.
With regard to students’ perceptions of support from teachers, our results demonstrate that 63.74% of the students agreed that their teachers are supportive (Figure 5). Teachers’ support was expressed in how students perceived teachers’ use of diverse teaching strategies, such as differential instruction, integrated learning, personalized learning, flipped classrooms, peer teaching, collaborative learning, and inquiry/project-based/experiment-based learning (Figure 5).
Finally, a t-test was performed to investigate the comparison of mean responses regarding the perceived support from family, society, and teachers (p < 0.001). The findings illustrated that perceived support from family (M = 3.01, S.D. = 3.45) and society (M = 2.81, S.D. = 2.50) is more than the teachers (M = 2.17, S.D. = 2.62). Finally, to ensure the reliability of the findings associated with students’ beliefs about teachers’ support, a correlation test was performed with the responses from teachers on the different STEM-driven teaching strategies. Accordingly, nine constructs (Figure 5) indicating students’ perceived support were investigated by correlating the mean of the students’ and teachers’ responses, as shown in Figure 6 below. As Figure 6 demonstrates, a close correlation was observed in the responses from both teachers and students on the teaching strategies employed in the classroom.
To gain better clarity into the gender-based distinction in the above findings, we disintegrated the overall student data. Thus, the study explored if there existed any variability between the male and female students’ perceptions. Findings from Table 3 reveal that female students exhibited relatively more positive perceptions of support from society and teachers than males (p < 0.05). Concerning support from families, no significant differences were detected between the two gender variables.

3.2.2. RQ2: Is There a Correlation between Students’ Perceived Support from Family, Teachers, and Society and Their Interest in STEM?

Based on Spearman’s Rho correlation test performed to understand the relationship between social support (from the family, teachers, and society) and students’ interests in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology, our results revealed positive trends (p < 0.01) (Table 4), indicating a direct dependence between the variables. The better the social support, the more likely students’ interest is further developed or improved.
When examining the students’ gender-based opinions about the relationship between social support and their interest in the individual STEM subjects (i.e., science, mathematics, engineering, and technology), no significant difference was observed, as is shown in Tables S2 and S3 (refer to Supplementary File). Regression tests were executed to examine the role of social support on students’ career aspirations, thereby shedding light on the RQ3.

3.2.3. RQ3: How Do Students’ Perceived Support from Family, Teachers, and Society Influence Their Likelihood of Choosing STEM Careers?

Bivariate logistic regression was performed to comprehend how students’ perceived social support correlates with their likelihood of pursuing STEM careers (Table 5). In our analysis, the students’ perceived support from the family, teachers, and society was considered the independent continuous variable, and the career aspirations (STEM or Non-STEM) were the binary dependent variable. The findings revealed that support from the family is highly significant (the level at 0.001) in student pursuit of STEM careers. The perceived support from teachers and society doesn’t increase their likelihood of pursuing a STEM career (Table 5). With respect to gender-based opinions, similar findings were observed, as shown in Tables S4 and S5 (refer to Supplementary File).

4. Discussion

Expatriates account for around 85% of Qatar’s population, thus making up an essential component of the country’s workforce and a key driver of its economy. As such, a critical challenge Qatar faces is the unbalanced labour force distribution with an evident underrepresentation of the national workforce, especially in STEM fields. In line with available scholarship dealing with the dearth of Qatari nationals in the labor market [37,38,39], further research is needed to shed more light on the factors likely to encourage or deter youth participation in STEM careers. This study has focused on exploring the role of different environmental variables, specifically social support such as the family, teachers, and society, in developing the STEM-related interests and aspirations of high school students.
In response to research question 1, the results in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 demonstrate that society, family, and teachers are presenting support in developing their STEM interests, as agreed by the majority. These results align with the SCCT, which defines social agents (parents, teachers, and society) as significant predictors of students’ STEM interests and career aspirations. Students indicated that their families encourage them to follow STEM pathways and engage in conversations associated with STEM. These observations align with the studies conducted in different parts of the globe. However, while those studies validated the role of parents in shaping female students’ choice of STEM [40,41,42], no significant difference was detected in the perceptions of male and female students of parental support as in the current study. As supported by findings, providing equitable support to both females and males is increasingly being promoted in Qatar [43].
A path analytic study by Sellami and colleagues investigated students’ STEM interests in Qatar and found that Qatari students’ STEM interests are directly influenced by teachers with distinct gender-based differences [10,27,44]. Interestingly the findings from the current study revealed that females perceived enhanced support from teachers and society. Female students’ positive outlook on the role of different social supports, including teachers and society, may be interpreted in light of the educational and job opportunities available to them alongside their male counterparts in Qatar, with relatively higher life satisfaction levels [42,45]. Studies analyzing the factors and experiences driving STEM interest among male and female students suggested that females rely more heavily on support from parents, teachers, peers, etc. [46,47]. This reinforces female students’ enhanced reliance on different social supports in this study.
Addressing research question 2, analysis of the role of social supports in contributing to students’ interest in individual STEM subjects revealed that social supports (from family, teachers, and society) positively correlated with students’ STEM interests. This finding aligns with the prior research, which reported that students who perceive greater social support (from parents, teachers, and peers) display more positive attitudes toward STEM education [48]. Teachers also have been found to play a significant pedagogical function through nine different teaching strategies (Figure 5) in the classroom, training students in academic subject areas and placidly contributing to developing distinct subject interests [49]. In line with the SCCT and EVT, the findings indicate the importance of teachers and parents in fostering student interests and self-efficiency in science [50] and mathematics [49,51]. Though studies offer insight into the distinct gender-based differences in the role of social supports in influencing STEM-based subject attitudes [52,53], the current study did not report any significant difference in the perception of male and female students.
Finally, in addressing research question 3, this study explored whether the perceived social support was correlated with students’ likelihood to pursue STEM careers using the Logistic Regression model, which disclosed that the students’ perceived social support from the family was positively related to their tendency to opt for STEM careers. As was shown above, parents constitute an important determinant of students’ STEM career aspirations [54,55]. These results align with EVT, pertaining to the influence of parents’ beliefs on children’s motivation and performance, thereby contributing to their career aspirations. Parents influence children’s STEM career aspirations by constant bonding and everyday science talks, contributing to their career decision-making, self-efficacy, and cognitive flexibility [56,57,58]. In sharp contrast, further research findings revealed that students’ perceived support from teachers and society doesn’t correlate to their STEM career aspirations. This begs the question positing whether parental advice/support is more effective in shaping their child’s career choices and course decisions when compared to advice/support from teachers and peers.
The eminence of STEM education and the role of teachers in nurturing student STEM interests remains critical to developing career aspirations and eventually joining the STEM workforce [59,60]. Evidence-based research is, therefore, needed to inquire further into the potential lack of teacher influence in driving students to choose STEM careers despite developing STEM interests. Our study proposes some key recommendations that may guide policymakers, educators, and researchers in implementing necessary educational improvements to create a socially supportive environment that attracts students to STEM fields. The wide STEM career spectrum characterizing labor market needs in Qatar makes it imperative that teachers are well aware of the diversity of STEM career options, hence the importance of developing STEM career-based knowledge to guide students from earlier stages of schooling.
To ensure the feasibility and positive outcomes of a STEM-driven educational reformation nationwide, respective authorities should engage teachers, counselors, parents, and students in career guidance fairs or related events to inform, attract, and support student interest in STEM and promote related career opportunities [61]. Informal learning experiences, such as STEM conferences and [62] science fairs [63], are often recommended to augment students’ confidence in attending university and interest in STEM. Likewise, robotics contests [64], and Olympiads [65], are reported to develop students’ attitudes, particularly in science and mathematics. Also, out-of-school training [66] and research programs [67] must be encouraged as they are essential predictors of STEM interests and career aspirations. Recently STEM infused curricula have also gained traction and are often suggested for quality STEM education that influences students’ STEM interests and career aspirations [68]. Also, to enhance quality STEM teaching, professional development should be an integral part of the support provided to teachers [69,70]. Specific research must be encouraged to understand the intrinsic/extrinsic challenges to STEM practices for teachers [71].
The results presented above need to be interpreted with some caution, however. The design of the current study should be considered in light of a few limitations. First, because a quantitative methodology was adopted in our study, it was not possible to delve in-depth into how and why students’ views and perceptions positively or negatively impacted their interests and aspirations. In addition, the risk of potential biases in the self-report survey might also exist. Thus, our findings could have benefited from using qualitative data based on interviews or focus discussions [72]. Second, solely relying on student data may be another methodological limitation because various influences come into play in determining STEM interests and career aspirations (i.e., socioeconomic, cultural, and educational factors). Therefore, our study’s results may be compounded by also looking at the perceptions of parents, teachers, and school officials.

5. Conclusions

This survey-based quantitative research investigated high school students’ perceptions of social support (i.e., support from family, teachers, and society) in developing their STEM interests and career aspirations. Based on SPSS analysis, survey results from 1426 11th and 12th-grade students in Qatar revealed that family, teachers, and society are positive determinants of students’ STEM interests (p < 0.01). Research findings further revealed that perceived social supports, such as from society and teachers, differ across gender, with females perceiving more support in developing their STEM interests (p < 0.05) compared to males. Meanwhile, distinct gender-based differences were nullable in the case of perceived support from family. Lastly, the logistic regression model illustrated that students’ perceived support from the family was aligned with their likelihood of pursuing STEM careers (p < 0.001), which was not perceived in the case of teachers and society. Therefore, we believe this study’s findings would guide policymakers, educators, academicians, and researchers in drawing on the educational, social, psychological, and other ways teachers and society could develop and sustain students’ STEM interests and career aspirations. Thus, the study also possesses international scope, alleviating the concerns over the scarcity of STEM-literate people worldwide by urging respective authorities to address this leaky STEM pipeline, considering the social support aspects.
Finally, the future scope of this research may include additional analyses to establish an in-depth understanding of social support (including support from peers and school counselors) and other context-specific factors that can foster interest in STEM and career aspirations. More research is needed to contribute to our understanding of gender-based variability regarding students’ perceived social support in Qatar. The incompatibility between students’ perceived support from teachers and their STEM career aspirations could be re-investigated more deeply to understand the underlying reasons. Future research is also required to understand better, in further detail, the changes that may occur in students’ STEM interests and aspirations over time and the possible variations in their developmental and educational paths and career trajectories.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su151712960/s1, Figure S1: Student’s Questionnaire. Table S1: Spearman’s Rho correlation depicting the relations between social support and male students’ STEM interests. Table S2: Spearman’s Rho correlation depicting the relations between social support and female students’ STEM interests. Table S3: Bivariate logistic regression illustrating the correlations between male students’ STEM interests and their likelihood to pursue a STEM career. Table S4: Bivariate logistic regression illustrating the correlations between female students’ STEM interests and their likelihood to pursue a STEM career.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: A.S.; Performed the experiments: A.S.; Analyzed and interpreted the data: Z.A.; Analysis tools or data: M.E.S. and Z.A.; Wrote the paper: A.S., M.E.S., N.S., Z.A. and J.B.; Critical revision of the paper: A.S., M.E.S., N.S., Z.A. and J.B.; Final approval of the version submitted: A.S., M.E.S., N.S., Z.A. and J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project was funded by Qatar University (Reference: QUCG-SESRI-20/21-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Qatar University (QU-IRB 1424-EA/20) on 1 March 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be provided on reasonable request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ortiz-Revilla, J.; Greca, I.M.; Arriassecq, I. A theoretical framework for integrated STEM education. Sci. Educ. 2022, 31, 383–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gamage, K.A.; Ekanayake, S.Y.; Dehideniya, S.C. Embedding sustainability in learning and teaching: Lessons learned and moving forward—Approaches in STEM higher education programmes. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rashidov, A.S. Using of problem educational technologies in the development of students’creative and logical thinking skills. Berl. Stud. Transnatl. J. Sci. Humanit. 2022, 2, 262–274. Available online: https://berlinstudies.de/index.php/berlinstudies/article/view/372 (accessed on 18 June 2023).
  4. Lytle, A.; Shin, J.E. Incremental beliefs, STEM efficacy and STEM interest among first-year undergraduate students. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 2020, 29, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kayan-Fadlelmula, F.; Sellami, A.; Abdelkader, N.; Umer, S. A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: Trends, gaps and barriers. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2022, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Van den Hurk, A.; Meelissen, M.; van Langen, A. Interventions in education to prevent STEM pipeline leakage. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2019, 41, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ben Hassen, T. A Transformative State in the Wake of COVID-19: What Is Needed to Enable Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Education in Qatar? Sustainability 2022, 14, 7953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qatar Ministry of Development Planning and Statistics [Internet]. 2021. Available online: https://www.psa.gov.qa/en/statistics1/pages/topicslisting.aspx?parent=Social&child=Education (accessed on 5 September 2022).
  9. Ong, A.K.S.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Pinugu, J.N.J.; Chuenyindee, T.; Chin, J.; Nadlifatin, R. Determining factors influencing students’ future intentions to enroll in chemistry-related courses: Integrating self-determination theory and theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2022, 44, 556–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sellami, A.; Santhosh, M.; Bhadra, J.; Ahmad, Z. High school students’ STEM interests and career aspirations in Qatar: An exploratory study. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Turner, S.L.; Joeng, J.R.; Sims, M.D.; Dade, S.N.; Reid, M.F. SES, gender, and STEM career interests, goals, and actions: A test of SCCT. J. Career Assess. 2019, 27, 134–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tey, T.C.Y.; Moses, P.; Cheah, P.K. Teacher, parental and friend influences on STEM interest and career choice intention. Issues Educ. Res. 2020, 30, 1558–1575. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gonzalez, K.; Lynch, K.; Hill, H.C. A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence Linking Stem Classroom Interventions to Teacher Knowledge, Classroom Instruction, and Student Achievement; Annenberg Institute at Brown University: Providence, RI, USA, 2022; Available online: https://www.edworkingpapers.com/sites/default/files/ai22-515.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2023).
  14. Ma, L.; Liu, J.; Li, B. The association between teacher-student relationship and academic achievement: The moderating effect of parental involvement. Psychol. Sch. 2022, 59, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cairns, D.; Areepattamannil, S. Teacher-directed learning approaches and science achievement: Investigating the importance of instructional explanations in australian schools. Res. Sci. Educ. 2022, 52, 1171–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, D.; Liu, J.; Ye, G.; Wang, T.; Xia, X.; Liu, J. Relationships among Problematic Smartphone Use, Mathematics Achievement, Teacher–Student Relationships, and Subjective Well-Being: Results from a Large-Scale Survey in China. Behav. Sci. 2022, 12, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, G.; Li, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, C.; Lu, L. A longitudinal study on the impact of parental academic support and expectations on students’ academic achievement: The mediating role of happiness. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2023, 38, 801–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Asanjarani, F.; Aghaei, K.; Fazaeli, T.; Vaezi, A.; Szczygieł, M. A structural equation modeling of the relationships between parenting styles, students’ personality traits, and students’ achievement goal orientation. Front. Psychol. 2022, 12, 805308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morrison, J.; Frost, J.; Gotch, C.; McDuffie, A.R.; Austin, B.; French, B. Teachers’ role in students’ learning at a project-based STEM high school: Implications for teacher education. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2021, 19, 1103–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tao, Y.; Meng, Y.; Gao, Z.; Yang, X. Perceived teacher support, student engagement, and academic achievement: A me-ta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. 2022, 42, 401–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Akram, M. Relationship between Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievement at Secondary School Level. Bull. Educ. Res. 2019, 41, 93–108. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fauth, B.; Decristan, J.; Decker, A.T.; Büttner, G.; Hardy, I.; Klieme, E.; Kunter, M. The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2019, 86, 102882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Adu-Boateng, S.; Goodnough, K. Examining A Science Teacher’s Instructional Practices in the Adoption of Inclusive Pedagogy: A Qualitative Case Study. J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 2022, 33, 303–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ralph, V.R.; Scharlott, L.J.; Schwarz, C.E.; Becker, N.M.; Stowe, R.L. Beyond instructional practices: Characterizing learning environments that support students in explaining chemical phenomena. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2022, 59, 841–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, X.; Bergin, C.; Olsen, A.A. Positive teacher-student relationships may lead to better teaching. Learn. Instr. 2022, 80, 101581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ahmed, F.B.J. Challenges of the knowledge society: Exploring the case of qatar. Glob. Econ. Obs. 2018, 6, 39–54. Available online: https://ibir-api.hbku.edu.qa/sites/default/files/2019-11/Fethi%20challenges.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2023).
  27. Sellami, A.L.; Al-Rakeb, N.A.; Tok, E. Secondary School Students’ Interest in STEM Careers in Qatar. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mustafa, S.A.-A.; Sellami, A.L.; Elmaghraby, E.A.A.; Al-Qassass, H.B. Determinants of college and university choice for high-school students in Qatar. Int. J. High. Educ. 2018, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ben Hassen, T. The state of the knowledge-based economy in the Arab world: Cases of Qatar and Lebanon. EuroMed J. Bus. 2021, 16, 129–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lent, R.W.; Brown, S.D.; Hackett, G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. J. Vocat. Behav. 1994, 45, 79–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lent, R.W.; Brown, S.D.; Hackett, G. Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. J. Couns. Psychol. 2000, 47, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Eccles, J.S.; Adler, T.; Futterman, R.; Goff, S.B.; Kaczala, C.M.; Meece, J.L.; Midgley, C. Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. Achiev. Achiev. Motiv. 1983, 1983, 75–146. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fredricks, J.A.; Eccles, J.S. Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Dev. Psychol. 2002, 38, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Koyunlu Ünlü, Z.; Dökme, İ. Multivariate assessment of middle school students’ interest in STEM career: A profile from Turkey. Res. Sci. Educ. 2020, 50, 1217–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Blotnicky, K.A.; Franz-Odendaal, T.; French, F.; Joy, P. A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2018, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kier, M.W.; Blanchard, M.R.; Osborne, J.W.; Albert, J.L. The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Res. Sci. Educ. 2014, 44, 461–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arugay, R. The changing landscape of human resource management in a Qatarization environment: A literature review. JPAIR Multidiscip. Res. 2021, 43, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hazaimeh, S.A.; Elbanna, S.; Fatima, T. Education and employment reforms toward developing human capital: The case of Qatar. CASE J. 2023, 19, 252–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Parvez, Z. Women workforce participation in Qatar: Oil, culture and demographic trends. In Contemporary Qatar: Examining State and Society; Zweiri, M., Al Qawasmi, F., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 231–245. [Google Scholar]
  40. Luo, L.; Stoeger, H.; Subotnik, R.F. The influences of social agents in completing a STEM degree: An examination of female graduates of selective science high schools. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2022, 9, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. McCoy, S.; Byrne, D.; O’Connor, P. Gender stereotyping in mothers’ and teachers’ perceptions of boys’ and girls’ mathematics performance in Ireland. Oxf. Rev. Educ. 2022, 48, 341–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Balta, N.; Japashov, N.; Mansurova, A.; Tzafilkou, K.; Oliveira, A.W.; Lathrop, R. Middle-and secondary-school students’ STEM career interest and its relationship to gender, grades, and family size in Kazakhstan. Sci. Educ. 2023, 107, 401–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Golkowska, K.U. Arab women in the Gulf and the narrative of change: The case of Qatar. Int. Stud. Interdiscip. Political Cult. J. 2014, 16, 51–64. Available online: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=456854 (accessed on 20 June 2023).
  44. Sellami, A.; El-Kassem, R.C.; Al-Qassass, H.B.; Al-Rakeb, N.A. A path analysis of student interest in STEM, with specific reference to Qatari students. EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2017, 13, 6045–6067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liloia, A. Gender and nation building in Qatar: Qatari women negotiate modernity. J. Middle East Women’s Stud. 2019, 15, 344–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ampartzaki, M.; Kalogiannakis, M.; Papadakis, S.; Giannakou, V. Perceptions about STEM and the arts: Teachers’, parents’ professionals’ and artists’ understandings about the role of arts in STEM education. In STEM, Robotics, Mobile Apps in Early Childhood and Primary Education: Technology to Promote Teaching and Learning; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2022; pp. 601–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dökme, İ.; Açıksöz, A.; Koyunlu Ünlü, Z. Investigation of STEM fields motivation among female students in science education colleges. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2022, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Affuso, G.; Zannone, A.; Esposito, C.; Pannone, M.; Miranda, M.C.; De Angelis, G.; Aquilar, S.; Dragone, M.; Bacchini, D. The effects of teacher support, parental monitoring, motivation and self-efficacy on academic performance over time. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2023, 38, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhu, Y.; Kaiser, G. Impacts of classroom teaching practices on students’ mathematics learning interest, mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics test achievements: A secondary analysis of Shanghai data from the international video study Global Teaching InSights. ZDM–Math. Educ. 2022, 54, 581–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cardona, M.C.; Buan, A.T.; Inutan, E.D. Teachers’ Perspective of Science Flexible Learning. Asia Res. Netw. J. Educ. 2022, 2, 1–16. Available online: https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arnje/article/view/257219 (accessed on 20 June 2023).
  51. McLean, L.; Gaul, D.; Penco, R. Perceived social support and stress: A study of 1st year students in Ireland. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2022, 20, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Abd Rahman, N.; Halim, L. STEM Career Interest: The Effect of Gender. Creat. Educ. 2022, 13, 2530–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Šimunović, M.; Babarović, T. The role of parents’ beliefs in students’ motivation, achievement, and choices in the STEM domain: A review and directions for future research. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2020, 23, 701–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Starr, C.R.; Ramos Carranza, P.; Simpkins, S.D. Stability and changes in high school students’ STEM career expectations: Variability based on STEM support and parent education. J. Adolesc. 2022, 94, 906–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cian, H.; Dou, R.; Castro, S.; Palma-D’souza, E.; Martinez, A. Facilitating marginalized youths’ identification with STEM through everyday science talk: The critical role of parental caregivers. Sci. Educ. 2022, 106, 57–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, H.J.; Park, J.Y.; Cho, K.D. Effects of parental attachment on career maturity in university students: Moderating effect of career decision-making self-efficacy and cognitive flexibility. J. Korea Contents Assoc. 2020, 20, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Parola, A.; Marcionetti, J. Career decision-making difficulties and life satisfaction: The role of career-related parental behaviors and career adaptability. J. Career Dev. 2022, 49, 831–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bentley, B.; Sieben, R.; Unsworth, P. STEM education in Australia: Impediments and solutions in achieving a STEM-ready workforce. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Waters, C.C.; Orange, A. STEM-driven school culture: Pillars of a transformative STEM approach. J. Pedagog. Res. 2022, 6, 72–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zafar, M. Career guidance in career planning among Secondary school students. Asian J. Educ. Soc. Stud. 2019, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sadovets, O.; Martynyuk, O.; Orlovska, O.; Lysak, H.; Korol, S.; Zembytska, M. Gamification in the informal learning space of higher education (in the context of the digital transformation of education). Postmod. Open. 2022, 13, 330–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Grinnell, F.; Dalley, S.; Reisch, J. High school science fair: Ethnicity trends in student participation and experience. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0264861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Graffin, M.; Sheffield, R.; Koul, R. ‘More than Robots’: Reviewing the Impact of the FIRST® LEGO® League Challenge Robotics Competition on School Students’ STEM Attitudes, Learning, and Twenty-First Century Skill Development. J. STEM Educ. Res. 2022, 5, 322–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jiang, H.; Zhang, L.; Lv, W. The impact of STEM Competitions on Students’ Career Interest and Persistence in STEM. In Proceedings of the 2022 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE), Xi’an, China, 6–8 May 2022; pp. 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maiorca, C.; Roberts, T.; Jackson, C.; Bush, S.; Delaney, A.; Mohr-Schroeder, M.J.; Soledad, S.Y. Informal learning environments and impact on interest in STEM careers. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2021, 19, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kitchen, J.A.; Chen, C.; Sonnert, G.; Sadler, P. The Impact of Participating in College-Run STEM Clubs and Programs on Students’ STEM Career Aspirations. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2022, 124, 117–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fan, S.C.; Yu, K.C.; Lin, K.Y. A framework for implementing an engineering-focused STEM curriculum. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2021, 19, 1523–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Han, J.; Kelley, T.; Knowles, J.G. Building a sustainable model of integrated stem education: Investigating secondary school STEM classes after an integrated STEM project. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 2022, 33, 1499–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Romijn, B.R.; Slot, P.L.; Leseman, P.P. Increasing teachers’ intercultural competences in teacher preparation programs and through professional development: A review. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2021, 98, 103236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sellami, A.; Ammar, M.; Ahmad, Z. Exploring Teachers’ Perceptions of the Barriers to Teaching STEM in High Schools in Qatar. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hamad, S.; Tairab, H.; Wardat, Y.; Rabbani, L.; AlArabi, K.; Yousif, M.; Abu-Al-Aish, A.; Stoica, G. Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM: Teacher perceptions and practice. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dou, R.; Cian, H. Constructing STEM identity: An expanded structural model for STEM identity research. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2022, 59, 458–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 15 12960 g001
Figure 1. Percentage of student responses from government and private schools (crossed as per grade, gender, and nationality).
Figure 1. Percentage of student responses from government and private schools (crossed as per grade, gender, and nationality).
Sustainability 15 12960 g001
Sustainability 15 12960 g002
Figure 2. Students’ perception of support from the family, teachers, and society.
Figure 2. Students’ perception of support from the family, teachers, and society.
Sustainability 15 12960 g002
Sustainability 15 12960 g003
Figure 3. Students’ perception of support from the family.
Figure 3. Students’ perception of support from the family.
Sustainability 15 12960 g003
Sustainability 15 12960 g004
Figure 4. Students’ perception of support from society.
Figure 4. Students’ perception of support from society.
Sustainability 15 12960 g004
Sustainability 15 12960 g005
Figure 5. Students’ perception of support from teachers.
Figure 5. Students’ perception of support from teachers.
Sustainability 15 12960 g005
Sustainability 15 12960 g006
Figure 6. Mean scores for students’ and teachers’ responses, defining perceived teachers’ support.
Figure 6. Mean scores for students’ and teachers’ responses, defining perceived teachers’ support.
Sustainability 15 12960 g006
Table 1. Demographics of the participants (by number).
Table 1. Demographics of the participants (by number).
Type of SchoolGradeGenderNationalityNumber
Govt. school
(n = 509)		11th
(n = 281)		Male (n = 119)Qatari12
Expatriate106
Female (n = 161)Qatari70
Expatriate88
12th
(n = 226)		Male (n = 58)Qatari8
Expatriate50
Female (n = 168)Qatari47
Expatriate120
Pvt. school
(n = 917)		11th
(n = 413)		Male (n = 155)Qatari14
Expatriate141
Female (n = 257)Qatari12
Expatriate245
12th
(n = 503)		Male (n = 235)Qatari18
Expatriate215
Female (n = 268)Qatari13
Expatriate255
Table 2. Internal reliability test (Cronbach’s Alpha and MacDonald’s Omega).
Table 2. Internal reliability test (Cronbach’s Alpha and MacDonald’s Omega).
Survey PartsConstructsNo. of ItemsCronbach’s AlphaMacDonald’s OmegaReliability
Part IIInterest in science50.7810.799Reliable
Interest in mathematics50.7210.730Reliable
Interest in engineering & technology50.8440.856Highly reliable
Part IIIRole of society40.8760.892Highly reliable
Role of family30.6740.702Reliable
Role of teachers90.9710.945Highly reliable
Table 3. Mann-Whitney U test, examining students’ perceived social support (from the family, teachers, society) across gender.
Table 3. Mann-Whitney U test, examining students’ perceived social support (from the family, teachers, society) across gender.
Dependent VariableIndependent VariableTest StatisticsValues
1Support from familyMaleMean rank532.59
FemaleMean rank539.22
p-value0.728
2Support from teachersMaleMean rank507.99
FemaleMean rank556.35
p-value0.012 *
3Support from societyMaleMean rank509.77
FemaleMean rank555.11
p-value0.017 *
Note: * Statistically significant at 0.05 level.
Table 4. Spearman’s Rho correlation depicts the relations between social support and students’ STEM interests.
Table 4. Spearman’s Rho correlation depicts the relations between social support and students’ STEM interests.
Support
from
Society		Support
from Family		Support
from Teachers		Interest in MathematicsInterest in ScienceInterest in Engineering & Technology
Support from society1.000
Support from family0.361 *1.000
Support from teachers0.357 *0.366 *1.000
Interest in mathematics0.155 *0.214 *0.083 *1.000
Interest in science0.235 *0.296 *0.181 *0.244 *1.000
Interest in engineering & technology0.178 *0.215 *0.077 *0.353 *0.095 *1.000
Note: * Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 5. Logistic regression model illustrating the influence of students’ perceived social support on their likelihood to opt for STEM career aspirations.
Table 5. Logistic regression model illustrating the influence of students’ perceived social support on their likelihood to opt for STEM career aspirations.
Dependent VariableIndependent
Variables		BS.E.Sig.Exp(B)Effect Size
STEM career aspirationsSupport from society0.0210.0230.3780.9800.113
Support from family0.1950.0310.000 *0.8230.600
Supports from teachers0.0020.0090.8390.9980.203
Note: * Statistically significant at 0.001 level. Abbreviations: B relates to the coefficient for the model, Exp(B) relates to the odds ratio (i.e., probability of the event happening/probability of the event not happening).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sellami, A.; Santhosh, M.E.; Siby, N.; Bhadra, J.; Ahmad, Z. High School Students’ Perceptions of the Role of Social Support in Cultivating Their Interests in and Aspirations to STEM Degrees and Careers—A Middle Eastern Case Study. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712960

AMA Style

Sellami A, Santhosh ME, Siby N, Bhadra J, Ahmad Z. High School Students’ Perceptions of the Role of Social Support in Cultivating Their Interests in and Aspirations to STEM Degrees and Careers—A Middle Eastern Case Study. Sustainability. 2023; 15(17):12960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sellami, Abdellatif, Malavika E. Santhosh, Nitha Siby, Jolly Bhadra, and Zubair Ahmad. 2023. "High School Students’ Perceptions of the Role of Social Support in Cultivating Their Interests in and Aspirations to STEM Degrees and Careers—A Middle Eastern Case Study" Sustainability 15, no. 17: 12960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712960

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop