Next Article in Journal
Landscape Evolution and Its Driving Forces in the Rapidly Urbanized Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area, a Case Study in Zhuhai City, South China
Previous Article in Journal
A CNN–LSTM Machine-Learning Method for Estimating Particulate Organic Carbon from Remote Sensing in Lakes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Selective Mechanisms of WO3 Catalyzing CO2 Desorption and Inhibiting NH3 Escape

1
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
2
Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
3
Shandong GRINM RS Semiconductor Materials Co., Ltd., Dezhou 253084, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(17), 13044; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713044
Submission received: 20 July 2023 / Revised: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 17 August 2023 / Published: 29 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Pollution Prevention, Mitigation and Sustainability)

Abstract

:
The high regeneration energy consumption and ammonia escape in the ammonia regeneration process are regarded as the main barriers for the commercial application of CO2 capture technology based on ammonia solutions. Metal oxides can enhance the CO2 desorption process and inhibit the ammonia escape at the same time, which can reduce the energy consumption of CO2 capture systems. Both ammonium carbamate (NH2COONH4) and ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3) are examined as the rich ammonia solution. The results show that when the concentration of tungsten trioxide (WO3) was 0.1 mol/L, the CO2 desorption efficiency could be promoted by 18.8% and the ammonia escape efficiency could be reduced about 14%. The mechanism by which WO3 increased the CO2 desorption process was clarified by XRD analysis as the production of ammonium tungstate. In addition, the other nine metal oxides exert no catalytic influence on the regeneration process.

1. Introduction

In the past several decades, climate change, which is caused by the excessive emission of greenhouse gases, has been established as one of many serious environmental issues. CO2 capture technology based on ammonia solutions is regarded as the most effective method to achieve the emission peak and carbon neutrality [1,2]. Although ammonia solutions have the advantages of higher CO2 loading capacity and lower regeneration energy compared with other absorbents, ammonia escape is also a main barrier to the commercial application of CO2 capture technology based on ammonia. The temperature of the regeneration process is much higher than that of the absorbing process. Therefore, reducing the regeneration temperature is of significance for their application, which can contribute to reducing energy consumption and inhibiting ammonia escape.
It is widely accepted that a lower regeneration temperature can result in a lower energy consumption. Many investigations about the regeneration process were subsequently carried out. Cheng et al. [3] pointed out that Cu(II) could act as a catalyst to intensify regeneration by a complexation reaction. Li et al. [4] investigated the system with a metal ion (Ni,Cu,Zn)—NH3-CO2-H2O and found that metal ions could promote the ammonia regeneration process. Voice [5] investigated the influences of metal ions (Ni,Cr,V,Mn) on the ammonia regeneration process and reported that Ni(II) had the best enhancing effect. Liu et al. [6] investigated three types of catalysts in various single and blended amine solvents and found that H-ZSM was the best catalyst. Bhatti et al. [7] found that metal oxides could catalyze the regeneration process of the aided amine solvent and reported the mechanism. Cheng et al. [3] reported that Cu(II) could reduce the regeneration energy consumption of MEA due to the complexation reaction. Li et al. [8] reported that the metal ion (Ni, Cu, Zn) could accelerate the CO2 desorbing rate of the ammonia regeneration process in a thermodynamic equilibrium model. And Li et al. [8] reported that the additive of Ni2+ was the best metal ion additive for the ammonia reaction system. Pachitsas et al. [9] investigated the influence of K2CO3 on the ammonia reaction system, and found it could reduce the energy consumption of the regeneration process. However, it also enhanced ammonia escape. Lv et al. [10] added metal ions (Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+) to the ammonia reaction system and showed that the additives could promote the CO2 desorption rate, which can reduce the energy consumption.
The temperature in the stripper is much higher than that in the absorber, which makes the ammonia volatilization much more critical than the absorbing process. Therefore, the ammonia escape-inhibiting technology is significant for the desorption process. The main technologies for inhibiting ammonia escape are ammonia washing and additives. Owing to the extra water consumption required for ammonia washing, the use of additives has been a focus [11]. Ma et al. [11] reported that Ni(II) and Co(II) can be used as additives to inhibit ammonia escape due to the complexation. Kim et al. [12] pointed out that the addition of Cu (II) can significantly reduce ammonia escape during the regeneration process. Mani et al. [13] carried out experiments on Zn(II) addition to the ammonia solution, and reported that Zn(II) could combine with NH3 to produce the complex ion [Zn(NH3)4]2+, which can inhibit the evaporation of free ammonia as well as the absorption of CO2. Ma et al. [14] concluded that the addition of Co(II) could reduce the free ammonia concentration in the liquid phase, which could move the desorption balance towards regeneration and increase the desorption efficiency of CO2 by 2–5% [15]. Resnik et al. [16] reported that ammonia escape was influenced by the ammonia concentration and the desorption temperature. Ammonia escape could reach 43.1% when the ammonia concentration was 14%. Ma et al. [17] reported that polyethylene glycol dimethyl ether (NHD) could inhibit the ammonia escape process by forming hydrogen bonds with free NH3.
As mentioned before, the ammonia regeneration process has rarely been investigated, and the catalysis of the metal oxide on the regeneration process was never reported. In this work, ten kinds of metal oxide catalysts were studied: ZnO, WO3, MnO2, TiO2, CuO, MoO3, Nb2O5, Cr2O3, ZrO2, and Al2O3. The effects of the metal oxides on the desorption of CO2 and the ammonia escape were clarified, and the catalytic mechanism was determined by XRD analysis, which can contribute to the industrial application of CO2 capture using ammonia.

2. Reactions and Experiment

2.1. Reactions

In the absorption process, the main reactions occurred in the liquid phase, and are the following:
CO 2 ( g ) + NH 3 ( aq ) NH 2 COOH ( aq )
NH 2 COOH ( aq ) + NH 3 ( aq ) NH 2 COONH 4 ( aq )
NH 2 COONH 4 ( aq ) + H 2 O ( l ) NH 4 HCO 3 ( aq ) + NH 3 ( aq )
NH 4 HCO 3 ( aq ) + NH 3 ( aq ) ( NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 ( aq )
NH 3 ( aq ) + H 2 O ( aq ) NH 3 · H 2 O ( aq )
NH 2 COONH 4 ( aq ) + CO 2 ( g ) + 2 H 2 O ( l ) 2 NH 4 HCO 3 ( aq )
NH 4 HCO 3 ( aq ) + NH 3 · H 2 O ( aq ) ( NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 ( aq ) + H 2 O ( aq )
The main species in the rich solution were NH2COONH4 and NH4HCO3 [18,19].

2.2. Materials

Ammonia solution (25–28%), zinc oxide (ZnO, 99%), tungsten oxide (WO3, 99%), manganese dioxide (MnO2, 85%), titanium dioxide (TiO2, 99%), copper oxide (CuO, 99%), molybdenum trioxide (MoO3, 99.5%), niobium pentoxide (Nb2O5, 99.9%), chromium trioxide (Cr2O3, 99%), zirconia (ZrO2, 99%), aluminum trioxide (Al2O3, 99.9%), and ammonium tungstate ((NH4)10H2(W2O7)6, 98.5%) were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. Nitrogen (N2, 99.9%) was obtained from Tianjin FuChen Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China).

2.3. Apparatus and Methods

Figure 1a shows the schematics of the experimental devices, which were mainly composed of an ammonia regeneration reactor, oil bath, cooling and drying system, and an on-line monitoring system. The oil bath provided heat for regeneration of the rich solution, which was monitored by thermocouple. The main regeneration reactions of the ammonia took place in the three-necked, round-bottomed flask (Yancheng Pritch Experimental Instrument Co., Ltd., Yancheng, China). A thermostatic magnetic stirrer (DF-101S, Shanghai Lichen-bx Instrument Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to control the temperature around 363K during the regeneration reactions, and 480 r/min was selected every time to remove the influence of the rotating speed on the regeneration process, which would ensure the reliability of the experimental data. The unit mass flow controllers (CS200, Beijing Sevenstar Microelectronics Co., Ltd.; Beijing, China) were used to control the flow rates and pressure of the gas. N2 was used to carry the desorbed CO2 and escaped NH3 out. The flow rate of N2 was set at 0.1 L/min and the inlet N2 pressure was 0.35 MPa. In experiments, the flow of N2 can dilute ammonia concentration in the gas phase to within the detection range, and the volume fraction was recorded every 0.5 min. The ammonia escape was calculated as the average concentration within 1 min after air intake. A glass airway with an outer diameter of 6 mm and a silicone tube with an inner diameter of 6 mm and an outer diameter of 9 mm were used to connect the apparatus.
An infrared CO2 gas analyzer (PGA 620, PhyMetrix Inc.; Medford, NY, USA) was used to measure the volume fraction of CO2 at the outlet, and the measurement range was 0–100%. Silica gel was selected as the desiccant, because it cannot react with the desorbed CO2. By recording the volume fraction of CO2 and flow rate of gas, the CO2 desorption efficiency was calculated successfully. An infrared NH3 gas analyzer (PTM 600, Shenzhen Eranntex Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen, China) was used to measure the volume fraction of NH3 at the outlet, and the range was 0–20%. Alkali lime was selected as the desiccant, because it would not react with the products. Through recording the ammonia volume fraction in gas phase and flow rate, ammonia escape summary and ammonia escape reduction can be obtained.
The volume of the regeneration solution was 150 mL. Referring to the process of CO2 absorption by the ammonia solution, the solution was prepared by using the ammonia solution and two kinds of intermediate products, NH2COONH4 and NH4HCO3. In the two kinds of desorption solution, the concentrations of ammonia were 2 wt%. The concentrations of ammonium carbamate and ammonium bicarbonate were 0.5 mol/L.

2.4. Order Independence Validation of Addition

As NH2COONH4 can react with the water and the ammonia, the influences of the addition order (water and ammonia) on the rich solution components should be investigated before the experiments. Therefore, experiments with different orders of addition were carried out and Figure 1b presents the variation in CO2 volume fraction under different addition orders, which illustrated that the regeneration process was not influenced by the addition order. Therefore, the ammonia solution was added to the reactor first and then the water was added, for both the NH2COONH4 and NH4HCO3 experiments.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of Catalyst on CO2 Desorption

The energy consumption of the regeneration was mainly influenced by the CO2 desorption process, so it was of benefit to clarify the influences of the catalyst on the CO2 desorption process for the application of CO2 capture technology. The experiments were carried out both for NH2COONH4 and NH4HCO3 solutions.

3.1.1. Ten Kinds of Metal Oxides

The regeneration experiments were carried out with 2 wt% ammonia solution and 0.5 mol/L NH2COONH4 at 363 K. The variations in CO2 volume fraction with time under different metal oxides are shown in Figure 2a, and the concentration of each metal oxide was 0.1 mol/L. Compared with the blank series, only WO3 can significantly promote the CO2 desorbing process. The variations in CO2 desorption amount with different catalysts are shown in Figure 2b, which illustrated that WO3 could enhance the CO2 desorption amount by 18.8%. Although MnO2, TiO2, and MoO3 could also promote the CO2 desorption amount by 3.6%, 2.2%, and 0.1%, the enhancement of the three metal oxides was too small to be investigated. Combined with Figure 2a,b, this showed that CuO, ZnO, Al2O3, Cr2O3, ZrO2, and Nb2O5 inhibited the desorption of CO2 from the rich solution. Compared with the blank group, Nb2O5 had the strongest influence on the desorption of CO2, inhibiting CO2 desorption by 21%. The same influences of metal oxides on the CO2 desorption from the NH4HCO3 rich solution were discovered; the detailed results are not shown here.

3.1.2. WO3 Concentration Effects

The influences of WO3 on NH2COONH4 and NH4HCO3 solutions were the same. Therefore, the NH4HCO3 solutions were introduced in this part. The rich solution was under the condition of 2 wt% ammonia solution and 0.5 mol/L NH4HCO3 at 363 K. The variations in CO2 volume fraction under different WO3 concentration (0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.175 mol/L) are shown in Figure 3a, which illustrated that 0.175 mol/L WO3 concentration caused the best promotion. The variations in CO2 desorption amount with different WO3 concentration are presented in Figure 3b, showing that the improvement in CO2 desorption increased as the WO3 concentration increased. The improvement caused by 0.175 mol/L was 19.4% compared with the blank series. Figure 3c shows the variations in CO2 volume fraction under different conditions, which indicated that the addition of WO3 could improve the CO2 desorption below 90 °C. The CO2 volume fraction under 90 °C and WO3 addition was clearly higher than that under 95 °C and in the blank group. Therefore, WO3 can reduce the regeneration temperature significantly, which can lead to the reduction in energy consumption. The addition of WO3 was beneficial to the ammonia regeneration process, which can save energy.

3.2. Effect of Inhibiting Ammonia Escape

Besides energy consumption, ammonia escape is another barrier for the commercial application of the CO2 capture technology based on ammonia. It was therefore of significance to clarify the influence of WO3 on the ammonia escape process. Both the NH2COONH4 rich solution and NH4HCO3 rich solution were investigated, and the variations in NH3 volume fraction in the gas phase over time were shown in Figure 4, in which (a) is for NH2COONH4 rich solution and (b) is for NH4HCO3. It can be seen that WO3 can inhibit the ammonia escape process both for the NH2COONH4 rich solution and NH4HCO3 rich solution. For the peaks of ammonia escape, the WO3 group in the NH2COONH4 desorption solution was 11% lower than the blank, and 14% for the NH4HCO3 desorption solution. Lv et al. [10] also reported that the addition of divalent metal ions (Ni, Cu, and Zn) can inhibit the ammonia escape during the regeneration by about 26.2%, 9.7%, and 9.6%, respectively. However, the addition of divalent metal ions may be complex with NH3, which might influence the regeneration process.
In conclusion, WO3 not only can promote CO2 desorption but also can inhibit NH3 escape, both of which can reduce the energy consumption significantly.

3.3. Analysis and Mechanism

The mechanism of WO3 was studied by various means. As shown in Equation (3), adequate NH2COONH4 would become NH4HCO3 in the solution. The desorption mechanisms of NH2COONH4 and NH4HCO3 were similar. Therefore, the rich solution of NH4HCO3 was mainly investigated. A UV–VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc.; Kyoto, Japan) was used and the scanning spectra of rich solutions are shown in Figure 5a; these were similar without obvious peaks. Therefore, there was no complex being formed.
For further investigations, XRD analysis was used. The comparison of rich solution with WO3 and the ammonium tungstate was shown in Figure 5b, which illustrated that the rich solution with WO3 was 90% similar to the fingerprint of pure ammonium tungstate. Therefore, the addition of WO3 can generate ammonium tungstate to inhibit ammonia escape and enhance the CO2 desorption process, as shown in Equation (8) [20] and Equation (9) [20].
According to the two-film theory, the main resistance to mass transfer between liquid and gas phase exists in the liquid film, and the ammonia escape rate is influenced by the concentration of free ammonia in the liquid phase [13,21]. The balance of the ammonia in the liquid phase is shown in Equation (10). The addition of WO3 can reduce the concentration of free ammonia as shown in Equation (11) and Figure 6. The reduction in free ammonia in the liquid phase can also enhance the regeneration reaction, which can promote CO2 desorption.
WO 3 ( aq ) + H 2 O ( aq ) H 2 WO 4 ( aq )
H 2 WO 4 ( aq ) + 2 NH 3 · H 2 O ( aq ) ( NH 4 ) 2 WO 4 ( aq ) + 2 H 2 O ( aq )
NH 4 + ( aq ) + OH ( aq ) NH 3 · H 2 O ( aq ) NH 3 ( aq ) + H 2 O ( aq )
2 NH 3 · H 2 O ( aq ) + WO 3 ( aq ) 2 NH 4 + ( aq ) + WO 4 2 ( aq ) + H 2 O ( aq )

4. Conclusions

In this work, the influences of ten metal oxides catalysts on the regeneration process were studied. The results showed that WO3 can enhance the desorption of CO2 and significantly inhibit ammonia escape. Compared with the blank group, WO3 can promote the CO2 desorption by 18.8% and inhibit ammonia escape by 14%. The catalytic reaction mechanism of WO3 was examined by XRD analysis, which illustrated that ammonium tungstate was generated during the reactions. The addition of WO3 can reduce the regeneration temperature, which can then reduce the energy consumption of regeneration and is beneficial for the application of CO2 capture technology.

Author Contributions

F.C.: Writing—Original Draft, Funding acquisition. X.L.: Writing. Q.G.: Experiments. L.Z.: Review. G.X.: Conceptualization. Q.W.: Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The financial support for this research, from the Open Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light Industry (Grant No. CP2022YB07) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51906012), is gratefully acknowledged.

Data Availability Statement

Final values were measured three times and all values were also calibrated by another apparatus.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Mora, C.; Spirandelli, D.; Franklin, E.C.; Lynham, J.; Kantar, M.B.; Miles, W.; Smith, C.Z.; Freel, K.; Moy, J.; Louis, L.V.; et al. Broad threat to humanity from cumulative climate hazards intensified by greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, N.; Kang, F.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, W.-F. A strategy for CO2 capture and utilization towards methanol production at industrial scale: An integrated highly efficient process based on multi-criteria assessment. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 293, 117516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheng, C.-H.; Li, K.; Yu, H.; Jiang, K.; Chen, J.; Feron, P. Amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture mediated by metal ions: Advancement of CO2 desorption using copper ions. Appl. Energy 2018, 211, 1030–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, L.; Conway, W.; Burns, R.; Maeder, M.; Puxty, G.; Clifford, S.; Yu, H. Investigation of metal ion additives on the suppression of ammonia loss and CO2 absorption kinetics of aqueous ammonia-based CO2 capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2017, 56, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Voice, A. Amine Oxidation in Carbon Dioxide Capture by Aqueous Scrubbing. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; Qi, G.; Chen, C. Study on mass transfer and kinetics of CO2 absorption into aqueous ammonia and piperazine blended solutions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 75, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bhatti, U.H.; Shah, A.K.; Kim, J.N.; You, J.K.; Choi, S.H.; Lim, D.H.; Nam, S.; Park, Y.H.; Baek, I.H. Effects of Transition Metal Oxide Catalysts on MEA Solvent Regeneration for the Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Process. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5862–5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, K.; Yu, H.; Tade, M.; Feron, P. Theoretical and experimental study of NH3 suppression by addition of Me(II) ions (Ni, Cu and Zn) in an ammonia-based CO2 capture process. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2014, 24, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pachitsas, S.; Bonalumi, D. Parametric investigation of CO2 capture from industrial flue gases using aqueous mixtures of ammonia (NH3) and potassium carbonate (K2CO3). Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2022, 114, 103567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lv, Z.N.; Qiao, K.; Chu, F.M.; Yang, L.J.; Du, X.Z. Experimental study of divalent metal ion effects on ammonia escape and carbon dioxide desorption in regeneration process of ammonia decarbonization. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 435, 134841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, S.; Chen, G.; Zhu, S.; Han, T.; Yu, W. Mass transfer of ammonia escape and CO2 absorption in CO2 capture using ammonia solution in bubbling reactor. Appl. Energy 2016, 162, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, Y.; Lim, S.-R.; Park, J.M. The effects of Cu(II) ion as an additive on NH3 loss and CO2 absorption in ammonia-based CO2 capture processes. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 211–212, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mani, F.; Peruzzini, M.; Barzagli, F. The role of zinc(II) in the absorption-desorption of CO2 by aqueous NH3, a potentially cost-effective method for CO2 capture and recycling. ChemSusChem 2008, 1, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, S.; Chen, G.; Ma, X.; Guo, M.; Han, T.; Song, H. Ammonia escape control in carbon dioxide capture using ammonia method. Huagong Xuebao/CIESC J. 2014, 65, 4086–4093. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ma, S.; Song, H.; Zang, B.; Chen, G.; Zhu, S. Experimental study of Co(II) additive on ammonia escape in carbon capture using renewable ammonia. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 234, 430–436. [Google Scholar]
  16. Resnik, K.P.; Garber, W.; Hreha, D.C.; Yeh, J.T.; Pennline, H.W. A parametric scan for regenerative ammonia-based scrubbing for the capture of CO2. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1 September 2006. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ma, S.C.; Song, H.H.; Sun, Y.X. Ammonia escape inhibited by NHD in the process of carbon capture using ammonia solution. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 610, 1901–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pazuki, G.R.; Pahlevanzadeh, H.; Mohseni Ahooei, A. Solubility of CO2 in aqueous ammonia solution at low temperature. Calphad 2006, 30, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shekunova, T.O.; Baranchikov, A.E.; Yapryntsev, A.D.; Rudakovskaya, P.G.; Ivanova, O.S.; Karavanova, Y.A.; Kalinina, M.A.; Rumyantseva, M.N.; Dorofeev, S.G.; Ivanov, V.K. Ultrasonic disintegration of tungsten trioxide pseudomorphs after ammonium paratungstate as a route for stable aqueous sols of nanocrystalline WO3. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 1758–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, Q.; Qi, T.; Zhou, K.; Liu, G.; Peng, Z. Equilibrium WO3 concentration in the Ca2+-(NH4)2CO3-(NH4)2WO4-NH3-H2O system. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 206, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, S.; Chen, G.; Han, T.; Zhu, S.; Yang, J. Experimental study on the effect of Ni(II) additive on ammonia escape in CO2 capture using ammonia solution. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2015, 37, 249–255. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematics of experimental devices and order independence of addition. (a) Schematics of experimental devices. (b) Variation in CO2 volume fraction with different addition order.
Figure 1. Schematics of experimental devices and order independence of addition. (a) Schematics of experimental devices. (b) Variation in CO2 volume fraction with different addition order.
Sustainability 15 13044 g001
Figure 2. CO2 desorption process of NH2COONH4 solution with catalyst. (a) Variation in CO2 volume fraction over time under different catalysts. (b) Variation in CO2 desorption amount with different catalysts.
Figure 2. CO2 desorption process of NH2COONH4 solution with catalyst. (a) Variation in CO2 volume fraction over time under different catalysts. (b) Variation in CO2 desorption amount with different catalysts.
Sustainability 15 13044 g002
Figure 3. CO2 desorption process of rich solution with WO3. (a) Variations in CO2 volume fraction under different WO3 concentration. (b) Variation in CO2 desorption amount with different WO3 concentration. (c) Variations in CO2 volume fraction under different conditions.
Figure 3. CO2 desorption process of rich solution with WO3. (a) Variations in CO2 volume fraction under different WO3 concentration. (b) Variation in CO2 desorption amount with different WO3 concentration. (c) Variations in CO2 volume fraction under different conditions.
Sustainability 15 13044 g003
Figure 4. Ammonia escape process in rich solution with WO3. (a) Variations in NH3 volume fraction over time in NH2COONH4 solution. (b) Variations of NH3 volume fraction over time in NH4HCO3 solution.
Figure 4. Ammonia escape process in rich solution with WO3. (a) Variations in NH3 volume fraction over time in NH2COONH4 solution. (b) Variations of NH3 volume fraction over time in NH4HCO3 solution.
Sustainability 15 13044 g004
Figure 5. Detection methods for solutions. (a) Scanning spectra of solutions. (b) Comparison of rich solution and ammonium tungstate.
Figure 5. Detection methods for solutions. (a) Scanning spectra of solutions. (b) Comparison of rich solution and ammonium tungstate.
Sustainability 15 13044 g005
Figure 6. The catalytic reaction mechanism of WO3.
Figure 6. The catalytic reaction mechanism of WO3.
Sustainability 15 13044 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chu, F.; Liu, X.; Gao, Q.; Zhong, L.; Xiao, G.; Wang, Q. Selective Mechanisms of WO3 Catalyzing CO2 Desorption and Inhibiting NH3 Escape. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713044

AMA Style

Chu F, Liu X, Gao Q, Zhong L, Xiao G, Wang Q. Selective Mechanisms of WO3 Catalyzing CO2 Desorption and Inhibiting NH3 Escape. Sustainability. 2023; 15(17):13044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chu, Fengming, Xi Liu, Qianhong Gao, Longchun Zhong, Guozhen Xiao, and Qianlin Wang. 2023. "Selective Mechanisms of WO3 Catalyzing CO2 Desorption and Inhibiting NH3 Escape" Sustainability 15, no. 17: 13044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713044

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop