Next Article in Journal
Design and Development of Optimal and Deep-Learning-Based Demand Response Technologies for Residential Hybrid Renewable Energy Management System
Previous Article in Journal
Ecological Restoration of Coalmine-Degraded Lands: Influence of Plant Species and Revegetation on Soil Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aspects of New and Old Urban Parks Most Valued by Residents on Social Media: A Case Study in Hefei

1
School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
2
Prefabricated Building Research lnstitute of Anhui Province, Hefei 230601, China
3
BIM Engineering Center of Anhui Province, Hefei 230601, China
4
Anhui Academy of Territory Spacial Planning & Ecology, Hefei 230601, China
5
School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(18), 13771; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813771
Submission received: 7 August 2023 / Revised: 7 September 2023 / Accepted: 12 September 2023 / Published: 15 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Health, Well-Being and Sustainability)

Abstract

:
The rapid development of new first-tier cities in China has led to potentially significant differences in residents’ environmental perceptions toward parks in new and old urban areas. However, there is currently a lack of relevant comparative research. Therefore, this study used the new first-tier city of Hefei as an example and selected the two most popular urban parks in the new and old downtown areas—Swan Lake Park and Xiaoyaojin Park. This study aimed to find out which aspects of the new and old city parks were the most valued by the residents by analysing their online comments on social media platforms. Based on the social media comments, quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted to study residents’ perceptions and preferences and analyse residents’ activities and satisfaction. The research found the following: (1) There was consistency in the type of content in the downtown parks as perceived by the residents of the new and old urban areas. (2) For the old downtown Xiaoyaojin Park, the residents were more interested in the experience in terms of the recreation facilities and services but were less satisfied with the visitor capacity of the playground and the ticket price. For the new downtown Swan Lake Park, the residents were more interested in the experience in terms of the exercise facilities and venues and were worried about the safety of the venues. (3) The perceived environmental preferences of the residents in the old urban areas were mainly related to childhood activity venues, and the perceived environmental preferences of the residents in the new urban areas were mainly related to novelty activities. Based on the results, targeted suggestions were proposed for the development of characteristic resources, facility management and maintenance, and the renewal and renovation of recreational activities. Since social media analysis plays an important role in the construction of urban parks, the findings can help us to better understand residents’ lives, ensure that parks are designed for the happiness of the people, and develop more sustainable pathways for the design and management of urban areas.

1. Introduction

During the 14th Five-Year Plan period, China’s socio-economic development aimed to promote high-quality development, which required continuous improvement in urban governance, focusing on the needs of the people and their well-being [1]. As the level of social development continues to rise, residents’ desires for both material and spiritual fulfilment, acquisition, and happiness are steadily increasing [2]. Especially in fast-paced developed cities, the pressures have intensified, and residents are plagued by psychological problems, such as depression, anxiety, and stress [3]. Therefore, parks are important for the well-being of residents and the sustainability of cities since they improve residents’ living environment and quality of life [4]. Many studies have shown that parks can effectively reduce the risk of anxiety and depression [5,6,7,8,9], reduce the probability of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [10], and increase creativity, physical vigour, and positive emotions [11].
Therefore, considering residents’ needs as an important indicator, optimising residents’ recreational experience and improving residents’ satisfaction and frequency of use are necessary to build people-centred urban parks.
Perceptions of the urban park environment are usually used to evaluate residents’ experiences and feelings during their visits to parks [12,13]. Currently, most domestic and foreign studies on residents’ perceptions of recreation in urban parks have been conducted based on two perspectives. One focuses on the psychological “perception” itself to try to improve the residents’ physiological and psychological satisfaction indicators in park environments through interviews, virtual environment simulation, eye-tracking technology, and psycho-electrical signals [14,15,16,17]. The second perspective is to focus on the “perceived results” [18], using the evaluation of the users as the focus of the study and analysing the advantages and limitations of the planning, design, and operation of the park. This information can then be used in promoting a good experience for residents during park recreation through the implementation of effective improvements in the physical space.
With the rise of the Internet, more and more people are recording and sharing their recreational experiences through social media platforms, which generates a large amount of real and effective data. Therefore, the use of big data technology to obtain information about people’s perceptions of park recreation offers the possibility for assessing environmental perceptions more comprehensively and objectively. Huang et al. [19] found that the frequency of “location words” on social media is usually related to users’ evaluation of the location’s attractions, services, and relevance to daily life. Then, Wan et al. [20] analysed social media data to investigate users’ preferences and values toward urban parks, and they obtained important information for developing social marketing strategies. Moreover, Kong et al. [21] used social media data and sentiment analysis to quantify and compare the positive emotions of visitors to different types of urban parks and to make recommendations for park planning and management. Additionally, Bubalo et al. [22] assessed the perceived value and quality of existing urban parks in Rotterdam, Netherlands, from the perspective of urban park users by analysing the textual content on social media. Lastly, Park et al. [23] used image recognition technology to extract data from photos on social media platforms to analyse people’s recreational experiences in urban parks. Thus, social media analytics is becoming a key source of data analysis in urban planning and design, providing a direct, convenient, and efficient means of data collection.
Due to the special characteristics of China’s high-density built environment, urban residents’ environmental perceptions and preferences in parks differ significantly from those abroad. For example, even within the same city, there are large differences between parks in the new and old areas in terms of accessibility, infrastructure, and demographic structure, all of which can have an impact on residents’ environmental perceptions. As previous studies have not focused on a comparison of new and old downtown parks in the same city, we attempted to explore this aspect. Additionally, to obtain the perceptions of and preferences for these local parks, this study selected the second perspective, i.e., the study of user evaluation. The main objective of this study was to find out which aspects of new and old city parks are most valued by residents through text analytics based on their online comments on social media platforms. The research questions were (1) “What are the residents’ perceived contents of the local parks in the new and old urban areas?”; (2) “What are the residents’ activity preferences in the local parks in the new and old urban areas?”; and (3) “What are the residents’ emotional preferences in the local parks in the new and old urban areas?”.
The purpose of the first and second questions was to understand how residents perceive new and old town parks through social media comments. Despite the limitations of social media analysis, it maximises the ability to scan and identify a wide range of public opinions. Based on this perspective, the key messages of the residents’ concern for the new and old town parks were determined. The third question was related to residents’ preferences for new and old town parks and how social media data can provide useful information about resident satisfaction. This was assessed by examining the content of the parks as perceived by users in comments on social media platforms and resident sentiment toward that content.
This study consists of six parts: an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusions. The literature review answers two questions: (1) “What is the environmental perception of urban parks?” and (2) “What can be gained from analysing urban parks from a social media perspective?”. After a review of previous studies, the data collection and data analysis are presented in the Materials and Methods, and this is followed by the Results. Finally, the conclusions of the study are presented and suggestions for targeted improvements are proposed based on residents’ perceptions and preferences for the new and old urban parks. The findings of this study could provide a useful reference for other new and old urban parks in the rapid urbanisation phase. Moreover, considering social media as a platform for public participation in urban planning provides a broader and more convenient way for the public to participate in urban planning. This not only helps to create an urban environment that meets people’s needs, but also further enhances people’s sense of well-being, which is of great significance to the sustainable development of cities.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Environmental Perception of Urban Parks

Recently, many Chinese cities have prioritized economic development, resulting in the reduction in urban green spaces, destruction of the ecological environment, and epidemics of infectious diseases [24]. Therefore, the Chinese government has paid more attention to the construction of urban parks in urban planning to maintain the stability of the natural environment and the social system of cities and to promote their sustainable development [25]. Urban parks are places that fulfil the need for residents to have access to nature in their daily lives. They not only improve people’s physical and mental health [26] and enhance social cohesion [27,28], but also provide considerable ecological and economic value to local communities [29,30]. Building high-quality parks is therefore a priority for people’s well-being [31,32]. Since frequent visits to parks by residents are required for them to obtain these benefits, urban park builders and managers need to understand people’s perceptions of and preferences for urban parks to ensure that they maximize their value to the public [33]. However, people’s perceptions of urban parks are often subjective, vague, and intangible, and quantifying residents’ perceptions of and preferences for urban parks is challenging. Consequently, environmental perceptions are less commonly considered in current park planning and management than other measures [34,35]. To obtain a more direct and accurate picture of residents’ perceptions of urban parks, research needs to be conducted from both positive and negative perspectives. Unfortunately, negative perceptions of urban parks have often been neglected in current research [36,37]. Urban park environments can also provide disadvantages such as physical hazards (e.g., lack of protection against waters and poisonous plants and animals) and lack of accessibility (e.g., inaccessibility and lack of infrastructure), which may cause strong negative feelings among park visitors. Therefore, this study considered both the positive and negative perceptions of residents with equal importance.
A series of studies have shown that the main factors affecting visits to urban parks include park landscape features, accessibility, and surrounding environment features [38,39,40,41,42]. Therefore, in terms of residents’ perceptions of the environment in urban parks, the landscape factors [43,44,45,46] in parks have been extensively covered by researchers. These landscape factors affect the emotional attitudes and behavioural activities of visitors and residents in urban parks. For example, landscape factors, such as plants, water bodies, and buildings, are closely related to the environmental perception of urban parks [47,48,49,50]. Moreover, the visiting frequency for landscape factors can provide further insight into people’s preferences. For example, landscape environments with water tend to be visited more frequently, and thus more urban parks have been including water features. Therefore, understanding what affects the environmental perception of urban parks and to what extent it influences people’s perceptions is necessary to assist urban decisionmakers and city builders in their policy-making.

2.2. Using Social Media Analysis to Study Urban Parks

Traditional evaluation studies of urban parks have focused on field surveys, i.e., questionnaires, interviews, and observations, to assess the benefits of park applications [51,52,53]. This type of research, which clearly and easily verifies the identity of the participants, has certain shortcomings as the data that are collected are limited by the researcher’s cognitive scope. The questions that are set by the researcher can lead the respondents, and the respondents may conceal their true perceptions due to the lack of anonymity. Another unavoidable drawback is that the data collection of traditional research methods is based on the peer-to-peer form, which is difficult to obtain, inefficient, and laborious. These limitations affect the generalizability and accuracy of the research results to a certain extent.
With the development of network technology, Web 2.0 provides a new way for the public to participate in urban development. Web 2.0 is a collection of technologies in which users create content, interact with other users, and share information [54]. People can share their views, opinions, ideas, and experiences on social media platforms [55]. Since social media data are characterized by the storage of large amounts of rich content and the rapid dissemination of information [56], there are many opportunities for researchers and policymakers to use these data to understand public life and opinions [57]. For instance, Zhang et al. [58] proposed a model of the process of the co-creation of tourism experiences through travellers’ journeys by utilizing people’s excursion experiences that were posted online. Then, Hausmann et al. [59] obtained visitors’ preferences for biotypes through photos of parks that were posted on social media platforms. Additionally, Wang et al. [60] identified and analysed the content that was posted by users on social media platforms to address the regeneration of urban parks.
Unlike typical surveys with targeted questions, social media data are often “loose”, “noisy”, and “dispersed” [61], and the data can be used to revisit the opinions on parks over time and re-examine our understanding of urban parks [60,62,63]. For example, in park design, monumental and iconic facilities are often at the centre of the landscape, yet according to social media data, architectural and man-made elements in parks are not strongly valued by visitors [64,65]. Furthermore, Wan et al. [20] collected and analysed Instagram-generated data and found that natural elements were more associated with well-being than with aesthetic experience. Then, Liang et al. [66] found that during the holidays, the density of visits to Shanghai’s urban parks was significantly higher and more concentrated in the city centre rather than in the parks on the outskirts of the city. As the most-developed city in China, Shanghai’s park use patterns provide some reference projections for other rapidly developing first- and second-tier cities in China. Thus, a large amount of online evaluation data can identify people’s uses and experiences of urban parks and help managers to clearly plan strategies and tactics from all perspectives [67].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Study Sites

Hefei ranks first in permanent urban population among China’s new first-tier cities [68], and the development of its urban parks is undergoing a transition from a focus on quantity to quality. Additionally, the rapid development of new first-tier cities has led to significant changes in the living environments of Hefei’s new and old city centres [69], and residents of the two districts have developed certain local perceptions of and preferences for local parks. Swan Lake Park and Xiaoyaojin Park are two famous and highly popular urban parks that are located in the centre of the new and old towns, respectively. They share some common characteristics, and many residents visit these parks, which makes them ideal choices for a social-media-based study (Figure 1).
Opened in 1952, Xiaoyaojin Park [70] was the first people’s park in Hefei. It is located in the old political affairs district within the first ring road of downtown Hefei, and it is an open waterfront park that was built around the old city centre of Hefei and is based on the old city wall. With beautiful scenery and humanistic feelings, the park is named after the ancient battlefield of the Three Kingdoms, which is known as “Xiaoyaojin”, and its biggest feature is that there is a lake in the park, an island in the lake, and a pavilion on the island. Additionally, as a park around the old city of Hefei, the composition of the park is like an “emerald necklace”, being tree-lined, with flowers in all seasons, waterfront walkways, a leisure plaza, public toilets, pavilions, seats, fitness equipment, and other functions and service facilities. Thus, residents of all ages can enjoy it.
Swan Lake Park [71] was built and opened in 2004. It is named after the lake, which is shaped like a swan, and it is a landmark park in the new city of Hefei. Being located in Hefei’s new political and cultural district, it is an open waterfront park that meets the recreational needs of residents. As an important landmark in Hefei, Swan Lake Park is surrounded by iconic buildings, such as stadiums, grand theatres, and municipal office centres. The park is centred on a swan-shaped artificial lake with various sculptures, fountains, artificial beaches, and landscapes, and is the future political, cultural, and recreational centre of Hefei with complete accessibility to transportation and public service facilities.

3.2. Data Collection

To understand residents’ perceptions of Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park, a large-scale collection of publicly available social media content was legally constructed using Python crawling techniques. The data that were obtained were anonymized and publicly available. This technology collects data from websites and stores them for further analysis or use, which enables the collection of large amounts of data and a better understanding of the users [72]. In this study, crawling code was written for relevant web pages that recognises the data structure of a web page and collects its information automatically, simulating the task of copying and pasting manually [73]. The database for this study was constructed from reviews that were posted by residents on DianPing (dianping.com (accessed on 6 August 2023)) and Ctrip (ctrip.com (accessed on 6 August 2023)). A comprehensive comparison of the Chinese local life service websites with the top Alexa comprehensive rankings revealed that DianPing and Ctrip had a higher number of comments about Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park (Table 1), richer content, fewer interfering factors, and higher differentiation between positive and negative comments (Table 2). Furthermore, most of the comments included the real feelings of the residents, so the combination of the data sources was effective.
The Python crawling technique was used to collect information about the park assessment, which included the user identifier (ID), star rating, text content of the reviews, and time of assessment. The real comments from the residents and visitors of Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park were captured from 1 February 2006 to 1 February 2023. Then, the comments were extracted into an Excel format, and the comments with non-local user IDs, pictures in the text of the comments that were not relevant to the study, and special characters were deleted. Also, meaningless words, such as “the” and “how many”, were filtered out, near-synonyms were replaced with unified expressions, and the specific word lists for Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park were established. After preprocessing the text data, 2050 usable evaluations were obtained for Xiaoyaojin Park, totalling 261,595 words, and 967 usable evaluations were obtained for Swan Lake Park, totalling 100,257 words.

3.3. Data Analysis

After the text was preprocessed, four main types of analyses were carried out: (1) word frequency analysis, which was aimed at discovering the attributes of the parks and the behaviours of the residents and tourists; (2) perception analysis, which categorized the residents’ evaluations and created a list of the elements of the residents’ perceptions of the old and new city parks; (3) semantic network analysis, which demonstrated the hierarchical relationship and the degree of affinity between the theme-related words and revealed the potential relationships between the main issues; and (4) sentiment analysis, which categorized the subjective text with emotional colouring and determined the emotional tendency. Among them, the word frequency, semantic network, and sentiment analyses were quantitative, while the perception analysis was qualitative.
Rost Content Mining 6 [74,75,76] software, which was developed by Prof. Yang of Wuhan University, was used for objective, systematic, and quantitative research. This software is the only large-scale free social computing platform for humanities and social sciences research in China, and its categorized corpus and test corpus are both in Chinese. The software has strong Chinese preprocessing ability, but the classification algorithm is relatively simple. Therefore, this study mainly utilized the functions of text separation and text feature extraction to process the text initially and obtain the topic-related words and word frequencies. Afterward, the co-occurrence network and visualization of the theme-related words were produced using Wordart (https://wordart.com (accessed on 6 August 2023)) and Gephi 0.9.2 software. Then, the “Sentiment Analysis” tool in Rost Content Mining 6 was used to further classify the keywords into emotions, and based on the co-occurrence network and visualization, the factors affecting the residents’ attitudes towards the park were analysed in depth.
The qualitative research is mainly based on rooting theory for the analysis of text. In this study, NVivo12 qualitative analysis software [77,78,79] was used as a coding tool, and the preprocessed comments were imported into the software as separate articles to be coded and analysed. To establish a categorized list of the perceptual elements in Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park, open coding was used to extract the conceptual categories, spindle coding was used to extract the main categories, and selective coding was used to extract the core categories. NVivo is mainly used to process non-quantitative and unstructured qualitative data and output the results in a quantitative form. Therefore, it achieves levels of universality, objectivity, and visualization that are similar to those of big data analyses.

4. Results

4.1. Word Frequency Analysis

Word frequency statistics can be used to understand the attributes of the study site and the behaviour of the residents and tourists. In this study, 200 high-frequency words were obtained through screening. Word frequency can provide a preliminary understanding of the general impressions, main perceived aspects, and key concerns of the residents toward Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park.
As can be seen from Table 3, the high-frequency words in the online evaluation of Xiaoyaojin Park were mostly nouns (including proper nouns), followed by verbs and adjectives. The noun categories were mainly locations, attractions, people, facilities, and other characteristics of the words. Specifically, “Xiaoyaojin Park”, “Hefei”, “Zhang Liao”, “Ferris wheel”, and “children” were mentioned more frequently. The verbs mainly reflect the main activities of the residents in the park, including “play”, “ponder”, “row”, “walk”, and “stroll”. The adjectives mostly expressed the overall perception of the park by the residents who visited the park, and the feedback was mostly positive, such as “suitable”, “very good”, “big”, “convenient”, and “fun”. These high-frequency adjectives usually describe the feeling of performing dynamic experiential activities, indicating that there were amusement facilities inside the park that were widely acclaimed.
As can be seen from Table 4, the high-frequency words in Swan Lake Park were also nouns that accounted for a large proportion of the main attractions of Swan Lake Park, the time, the location, and the crowd, such as “Swan Lake”, “sandy shore”, “night”, “light show”, “city central business district”, and “children”. The top-ranking high-frequency verbs included “walking”, “swimming”, “exercise”, “running”, and “stroll”. The adjectives included “suit”, “excellent”, “large”, “beautiful”, and “boisterous”, which had a high degree of overlap with the high-frequency adjectives of the other park. This reflected the residents’ positive perception of the two parks in the old and new towns in terms of the park scale, the environmental conditions, and the recreational experience, which were relatively similar.
The study sites were processed using Rost Content Mining 6 to derive meaningful keywords and their centrality, and then the WordArt website was used to generate a word cloud of Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park (Figure 2). The word cloud graph not only reflected the overall impression of the residents of Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park but also clearly showed the perceived scenic hotspots. The size of the text in the graph reflects the importance of the keyword. The residents’ perceived hotspots in the park included “recreation facilities”, “renovation projects”, “history of the Three Kingdoms”, and “memories of childhood”. This reflected the residents’ overall impression of the park. The term “memories of childhood” reflects a high degree of concern for the recreational facilities and humanistic landscape. For Swan Lake Park, the perceived hotspots were “Swan Lake”, “light show”, “sandyshore”, and “nightscape”, reflecting the residents’ high concern for recreational activities and the artificial landscape.

4.2. Perceived Content Analysis

In this study, Nvivo 12 software was used to analyse and review the data and conceptualise the generalisation and comparison process of the residents’ evaluation content. Drawing on scholars’ previous criteria for classifying the perceived contents of urban park environments, the data were divided into four major categories and ten subcategories (Table 5 and Table 6). The four major categories are detailed below. Based on the proportion of the main categories, the contents that the residents mainly valued in Xiaoyaojin Park were, in descending order, the service facilities (33.30%), recreational activities (28.57%), landscape attractions (26.92%), and characteristic environments (11.21%); for Swan Lake Park, they were the landscape attractions (33.79%), recreational activities (26.81%), service facilities (24.10%), and characteristic environments (15.30%). Both parks had lower values for the creation of characteristic environments, which needs further improvement.

4.2.1. Landscape Attractions in Downtown Parks

Landscape attractions include both natural and man-made landscapes, with natural landscapes being a common focus for residents in both the old and new towns. The landscape that is derived from the historical resources of Xiaoyaojin Park was found to be the focus of the park, such as the “Xiaoyaojin Pavilion” and the “Dujin Bridge”. There are also natural characteristics of the landscape, such as hydrangeas, hibiscuses, and lotuses. Swan Lake Park has a swan lake and an artificial beach at its centre, and, together with the night lights, these have become the highlight for attracting residents for recreation.

4.2.2. Characteristic Environments in the Downtown Parks

Characteristic environments include climatic conditions, landscape features, and smells and sounds. In terms of the climatic conditions and smells and sounds, both parks were suitable for the residents in terms of air quality and temperature. The landscapecharacter was a common concern for residents of both the old and new town areas. In terms of the landscape features, the Three Kingdoms cultural area at the base of Xiaoyaojin Park added historical features to the environment of the park, while Swan Lake Park’s swan lake, beach, and light show resulted in a completely modern lakefront leisure scene.

4.2.3. Service Facilities in the Downtown Parks

Services facilities include the location conditions and facility services. Residents of the old town area were more concerned about the facility services in Xiaoyaojin Park, while the residents of the new town area were more concerned about the location of Swan Lake Park. The two parks are located in the centre of the old and new town areas, so there is a large flow of people and convenient transportation. In terms of facilities, there are more playground facilities inside Xiaoyaojin Park, which evoked memories of many residents’ childhood, but the lack of recent maintenance and management measures has led to a low level of satisfaction for the residents. Meanwhile, Swan Lake Park has fewer types of facilities and mostly simple fitness equipment, so maintenance is easier and users are more satisfied.

4.2.4. Recreational Activities in the Downtown Parks

Recreational activities include recreation time, recreation crowds, and recreation behaviours. The residents of the old and new town areas mostly chose evenings, weekends, holidays, and other leisure times. The recreational crowd was mainly families with children, which was followed by friends and couples. The difference in the recreational behaviours between the two parks was mainly determined by the service facilities and characteristics of the environment, with more play facilities in the park resulting in more recreational behaviours in Xiaoyaojin Park. Meanwhile, Swan Lake Park’s fitness facilities and the lakefront environment of the park meant that the residents’ recreational behaviours at this location favoured fitness and exercise activities.

4.3. Semantic Network Analysis

To further interpret the residents’ environmental perceptions of Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park, this study used NetDraw 2.084 software to conduct a semantic network analysis and then optimised the network relationship mapping using Gephi 0.9.2 software. Then, the vocabulary semantic network analysis visualisation map was obtained.
As shown in Figure 3, the semantic network of the park shows the distribution characteristics of the multiple cores radiating outwards. With “Xiaoyaojin Park” as the centre, the words “recreation facilities” and “Hefei” were central to the residents’ perception of the park’s environment, which indicates that residents paid great attention to the recreational facilities and local conditions of the park. The core vocabulary was similar in its circle composition; using “recreation facilities” as an example, it extended to “landscape”, “play”, “Elephant Slide”, “pedestrian street”, and “history”. The “scenery” is a natural landscape term, “play” is a recreational behaviour, “Elephant Slide” is an amusement facility, “pedestrian street” represents the local conditions, and “history” is a landscape characteristic. The circles that were formed by these words indicated that the residents’ main perceptions of the park were composed of landscape attractions, characteristic environments, service facilities, and leisure activities. Overall, residents mostly had positive environmental perceptions of characteristic and reminiscent recreational activities, which is consistent with collective memory research on historical and cultural landscapes in parks in old urban areas.
Figure 4 shows that the semantic network of Swan Lake Park is more concentrated when compared with that of Xiaoyaojin Park, with “Swan Lake” as one of the central words, which is connected to almost all of the words. Also, the sub-centres of the words that are closely connected to it are “artificial sandy shore” and “Hefei”, so the residents’ main environmental perceptions of Swan Lake Park focused on landscape attractions and the local conditions. In the sub-circle, the words that related to the attraction “artificial sandy shore” are “summer”, “night”, “children”, and “walk”, which reflects the residents’ focus on leisure time and activities during the visit and also reflects the lack of secondary attractions connected to the main attraction. The outermost vocabulary is more dispersed than that for Xiaoyaojin Park and the degree of connection between them is not high. This indicates that the Swan Lake Park environment’s perception was more singular, reflecting the need to take into consideration the continuation of memory and preserving cultural heritage when planning and designing new city parks.

4.4. Emotional Analysis of the Residents

The text sentiment analysis was used to analyse the subjective text with emotional colours, mine the emotional tendencies contained therein, and divide the emotional attitudes, which is a current research hotspot in natural language processing. In this study, Rost Content Mining 6 was used to analyse the sentiment of the online review texts for Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park to compare the residents’ affective tendencies toward the overall environment of the two parks in the old and new downtown areas (Table 7).
Overall, the residents’ affective tendencies toward the two parks in the old and new towns were dominated by positive emotions. Positive emotions had the highest proportion in both places among the three types of emotions, and the residents were satisfied with the park environment as a whole, but the residents’ overall positive emotions for Swan Lake Park (59.13%) in the new town were much higher than those for Xiaoyaojin Park (45.92%) in the old town. Accordingly, the percentage of negative emotions towards Xiaoyaojin Park (33.07%) was about five times that for Swan Lake Park (6.88%).
To further explore the differential factors of the residents’ emotions, an online review of the texts about the two parks was constructed to visualise the positive and negative lexical–semantic network analysis (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Firstly, since Xiaoyaojin Park is located in the old city, it mainly relies on the cultural heritage of the Three Kingdoms and rich and varied amusement facilities to satisfy the residents’ needs in terms of amusement and science popularisation. However, during the park’s operation period, the words “line up”, “embarrassing”, “regret”, and “expensive tickets” reflected that the sustainable development of the cultural features and the service management of the amusement facilities did not satisfy the residents. Among them, the environmental capacity of the amusement area and pricing problems were particularly prominent.
In contrast, Swan Lake Park in the new city, as a new landmark, with a convenient location, perfect infrastructure, and a local environment to meet the residents’ recreational needs, was seen to be a people-oriented lakefront park. For example, the light show that was held on the beach at night was very well received by the residents of the neighbourhood. However, it is worth noting that the safety of its waterfront activities was one of the dominant factors of residents’ negative emotions towards Swan Lake Park, which is the park’s largest feature attraction. There have been news reports of drowning incidents in the lake every year, which has been causing concern. Another negative concern is the lack of swans, which not only relates to the branding of the park but also reflects a problem with the creation of an ecological environment.

5. Discussion

5.1. Discussion of the Results

5.1.1. Comparative Analysis of the Perceived Content of the Local Parks by New and Old City Residents

There was consistency in the categories of the residents’ perceptions of the local parks in the old and new towns, which can be summarized into four main categories (landscape attractions, characteristic environment, service facilities, and recreational activities) and ten secondary categories (natural landscape, artificial landscape, climatic conditions, landscape characteristics, smells and sounds, location conditions, facilities and services, recreation time, recreation crowds, and recreation behaviours). These elements are similar to the findings of most park evaluation indicators [20,80,81].
The main reason for the difference in the top perceived categories of the local parks between the old and new urban areas was because of the differences between the urban areas. Wang et al. [82] suggested that the differences between urban areas in terms of residents’ perceptions of parks are related to the quality of the parks. Notably, this study found that the residents of the old and new urban areas had the worst perception of the characteristic environment, i.e., the residents had a vague perception of the characteristic environment of the local central park, and most of the residents thought that the meaning of the park’s name was not well represented in the landscape. When compared with previous studies [20,40,80,83,84] on residents’ perceptions of parks, this study found an aspect that has been rarely mentioned in the literature. Residents were found to pay more attention to the creation of the characteristic environment, and, thus, how to shape the “park IP” and form a “park brand” [67,85] should be the main future direction of urban park optimization.

5.1.2. Comparative Analysis of the Residents’ Preferences for Local Park Activities in the Old and New Cities

The construction of urban parks must be people-centred to meet more diversified needs [66]. In the old city, the residents of the park were more attracted by the amusement facilities. Residents tended to visit the park as a family unit and often stayed in the amusement activity area, and they were interested in the facilities related to the Three Kingdoms culture. The main activities in the park and issues related to the park are highlighted in the word cloud map and semantic network relationship mapping. For the main activities, using the elephant slide and riding the Ferris wheel were the most frequently mentioned on social media platforms. Due to the early establishment of the park and the low mobility of residents, some of the old rides such as the elephant slide carried childhood memories for most of the residents and became a Netflix hotspot. It is worth noting that Xiaoyaojin Park is a park that was built with the history and culture of the Three Kingdoms as its specialty, but it had the lowest percentage of specialties in the environmental perception category. This is because there are fewer facilities related to the history and culture of the Three Kingdoms, and the overall architectural style of the park is not uniform, which leads to few activities for residents in the featured landscape area. These results broadly support the proposition that urban parks are designed for residents’ daily activities, but in terms of the characteristics of Xiaoyaojin Park itself, it lacks historical and cultural-themed activities.
Swan Lake Park in the new city is integrated into the daily lives of neighbourhood residents. Residents like to come to the lake for exercise in the morning and at night but are concerned about water quality and safety. Since the new town has a large proportion of young and old residents, fitness and exercise-related facilities and venues were given more consideration in the design. For new town residents, the purpose of visiting the park is to exercise or to participate in activities such as “Summer”, “Light Show”, “Swan Lake”, “Sandy Beach”, and other activities. In addition, as Swan Lake Park is a landmark attraction that is surrounded by various commercial and governmental buildings, there may be many sightseeing tourists coming to the park, and residents experience overcrowding in terms of space for “transportation” and “parking” activities.

5.1.3. Comparative Analysis of the Emotional Attitudes of the New and Old City Residents toward Local Parks

Residents of both the old and new towns had the highest percentage of positive feelings toward local parks. According to the analysis, this result was due to the qualities of the parks themselves and positive reflections on activities with family and friends. The residents of the old city tended to visit Xiaoyaojin Park as a family, and in China, where children’s emotions are important to the whole family, the value of the experience increases when the park’s rich recreational facilities are loved by the children. In addition, as the earliest urban park was built in Hefei City, Xiaoyaojin Park is the place where most residents played in their childhood, and the memory of experiencing the landscape during their childhood means that they have developed an attachment and preference for the environment [86,87]. The results of this study provide insights into people’s attitudes toward urban parks and values related to them, which have been neglected in existing research.
Surprisingly, negative emotions in Prosperity Park were approximately five times higher than those in Swan Lake Park. This is despite the fact that Xiaoyaojin Park is rich in activities and embraces the history and culture of the Three Kingdoms. The reasons for this result are complex and can be reasonably inferred using social media analysis. With the variety of activities in the park and the long hours that were spent there by the residents, “crowding” and “queuing” were the main factors that led to the negative sentiment. There was also the issue of the amusement ride fees, and people’s dissatisfaction was reflected in the high frequency of the word “expensive”. This is consistent with other scholars’ findings [20,40,80,83,84] that the accessibility of play areas and the appropriateness of ticket pricing have been the main concerns of residents when visiting parks. When compared with Xiaoyaojin Park, Swan Lake Park has fewer themed activities and only performs themed light shows at specific times of the night. However, for residents in the Swan Lake Park neighbourhood, the light show was an unexpected event and therefore more exciting and enjoyable. This finding may explain why excitement [20,67,88] is considered to be an important element of urban parks.

5.2. Research Recommendations

(1)
There should be an emphasis on the development and promotion of natural and humanistic resources. A great proportion of the keywords of the two parks in the old and new towns included natural and humanistic landscapes, and the residents’ satisfaction was higher, so the parks should pay attention to the existing characteristic resources. The park in the old city is themed on the ancient Three Kingdoms to create a natural landscape with humanistic feelings, but there is a lack of interaction with the culturally themed display. Thus, it is recommended that additional cultural activities should be added, such as a Three Kingdoms theatre performance and the exhibition of cultural creations in the park. In contrast, Swan Lake Park in the new city has a lack of local characteristics with cultural connotations and regional memorable traces of history, which leads to a lack of emotional interaction between the residents and the landscape environment. Thus, it does not inspire people’s hearts. Therefore, as the most frequent keyword was “Swan Lake”, we would suggest increasing the playfulness and attractiveness of the routes along the lake, such as the construction of fitness facilities and trails, the planting of suitable plants, and the introduction of swans in the lake, which will leave unique memories for the residents.
(2)
Additionally, the management and maintenance of park areas and leisure facilities should be strengthened. Recreational services and facilities are important for promoting residents’ positive tendencies in terms of their environmental perception. In the semantic network of the negative emotions in Swan Lake Park, the security of the waterfront recreation area was the dominant factor of residents’ negative emotions, so strengthening the security measures in the waterfront area should be the focus of further improvements in the park. Moreover, it is recommended that additional security signs and security personnel should be installed in the accident-prone area. When compared with Swan Lake Park, Xiaoyaojin Park has been around for a longer period, and many of the leisure service facilities have a lot of potential safety hazards due to aging or poor management, so residents’ negative emotions are more prevalent. To enhance residents’ leisure experience, the management of the park area and the maintenance of the leisure facilities should be improved, such as the maintenance and management of the pavilions, water pavilions, park squares, recreational trails, other open spaces, and other architectural landscapes. Also, some of the damaged public service facilities should be replaced to optimise the management of the amusement park facilities. Furthermore, improvements in the awareness and level of service management in recreational areas, such as queuing guidance, pier safety management, food and beverage outlets, and ticket prices, should be conducted to enhance the demand for people-centred park services.
(3)
Renewal and renovation should also be conducted based on the location’s advantages and the crowd structure. The two parks are the central parks of the old and new towns, with convenient traffic, a large flow of people, and sufficient location advantages. Additionally, in terms of the composition of the recreational crowd, families with children account for a relatively large proportion of the population, and therefore the safety of the service facilities and the recreational nature of the park should be the focus. Since Xiaoyaojin Park is located in the old city, there is a stronger recreational need for older residents, such as squares, pavilions, and fitness equipment, and the climate and environmental requirements are higher. Thus, the priorities for the park should be infrastructure and natural landscape enhancement. For Swan Lake Park, young people have a greater demand for fitness and recreational activities, and thus the optimisation of the exercise routes along the lake and its surrounding greenery and activities on the beach should be the focus of the park’s improvement.

5.3. Limitations and Prospects

This study demonstrates the analysis of urban park development based on social media data. Social media analysis was used to understand how the residents perceive and use the new and old city parks. However, most of the social media data providers consisted of young and middle-aged people, with fewer elderly people and children. Therefore, in the future, we would recommend conducting offline surveys that specifically target the elderly and children to address this limitation.

6. Conclusions

In this study, Hefei, one of the new first-tier cities in China, was selected and text analysis was used to analyse the ratings of the two most popular new and old downtown parks that were chosen by residents on social media. The main findings can be summarized as follows:
(1)
Residents of the old and new downtown areas basically perceived the content of the downtown parks in terms of four categories: landscape attractions, characteristic environment, service facilities, and recreational activities.
(2)
Residents had higher expectations for the play facilities and service management of the parks in the old downtown area. The attraction of the park in the old downtown area was mainly based on the setting of the playgrounds and the popularity accumulated due to its long history. Dissatisfaction with the park’s centres was based on the capacity of the play area and the ticket price.
(3)
Residents were more interested in the experience of the new downtown park in terms of the exercise facilities and landscape environment. The attraction of the new downtown park for the residents was focused on the novel activities that were organized in the parks, which created excitement and pleasure. Additionally, the security of the landscape was the main source of residents’ negative emotions.
Based on the social media data, this study proposes a new perspective for understanding urban park use by comparing residents’ perceptions of new and old urban parks. The significance of the study is that it avoided the shortcomings of traditional studies and utilized new technology to obtain a large amount of comprehensive evaluation information, making the results timelier and more universal. Moreover, Hefei City, as a new first-tier city, has an urbanization development process that is the epitome of most cities in China, and coupled with its location in the central region, it combines the characteristics of cities in the north and south. Thus, the selection of highly popular parks in its old and new downtown areas is representative of many cities and has research value. More importantly, this study demonstrated how social media data can be used to study urban parks, and it provided a better understanding of how to build and manage urban parks. The findings can inform urban renewal decisions, improve people’s well-being, enhance urban vitality, and assist in realizing sustainable urban development.

Author Contributions

Methodology, D.M.; software, D.M.; validation, D.M.; formal analysis, D.M.; resources, S.Z.; data curation, D.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.; writing—review and editing, D.M. and S.Z.; visualization, S.Z.; supervision, T.S.; project administration, T.X.; funding acquisition, T.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Anhui Provincial Department of Education Major Project (SK2020ZD25), Anhui Province Housing and Urban–Rural Construction Science and Technology Program (2022-RK035), Key Projects of Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Anhui Higher Education Institutions of China (2022AH050226) and Open Subjects of Research Platform of Prefabricated Building Research Institute of Anhui Province (AHZPY2021ZR02).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analysed in this study. These data can be found on DianPing (dianping.com (accessed on 6 August 2023)) and Ctrip (ctrip.com (accessed on 6 August 2023)).

Acknowledgments

This study could not have succeeded without park visitors sharing their opinions on social media platforms, for which we are very grateful.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Proposal of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on the Formulation of the Fourteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and the Vision for the 2035 Period; People’s Daily; State Council of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2020.
  2. Li, J. A New Era Path to Modernized Urban Governance. China Soc. Sci. Dly. 2020, I, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. David, V.; Sandro, G. Urbanization, urbanicity, and health. J. Urban Health Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 2002, 79, S1–S12. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tu, X.; Huang, G.; Wu, J. Review of the relationship between urban greenspace accessibility and human well-being. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 421–431. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Q.; Lan, S. Tourists’ environmental preferences, perceived restoration and perceived health at Fuzhou National Forest Park. Resour. Sci. 2018, 40, 381–391. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, R.; Zhang, C.Q.; Rhodes, R.E. The pathways linking objectively-measured greenspace exposure and mental health: A systematic review of observational studies. Environ. Res. 2021, 198, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pun, V.C.; Manjourides, J.; Suh, H.H. Association of neighborhood greenness with self-perceived stress, depression and anxiety symptoms in older U.S adults. Environ. Health 2018, 17, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, Y.; Wang, R.Y.; Xiao, Y.; Huang, B.S.; Chen, H.S.; Li, Z.G. Exploring the linkage between greenness exposure and depression among Chinese people: Mediating roles of physical activity, stress and social cohesion and moderating role of urbanicity. Health Place 2019, 58, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Choi, K.A.; Rezaei, M. Assessing the Correlation between Neighborhood Green Areas and the Perceived Mental Health of Residents in Metropolitan Areas. Iran J. Public Health 2022, 51, 2027–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abdonas, T.; Regina, G.; Dalia, L.; Audrius, D.; Regina, R.; Migle, B.; Jone, V.; Gailute, B.; Ricardas, R.; Vilija, M.; et al. Accessibility and use of urban green spaces, and cardiovascular health: Findings from a Kaunas cohort study. Environ. Health A Glob. Access Sci. Source 2014, 13, 20. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tan, S.; Yang, C.; Li, L.; Zhang, L. Park Environment Influences on Health Restoration Review. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2020, 36, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Soubry, B.; Sherren, K.; Thornton, T.F. Are we taking farmers seriously? A review of the literature on farmer perceptions and climate change, 2007–2018. J. Rural. Stud. 2020, 74, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Krüger, E.L.; Costa, T.F.M. Interferences of urban form on human thermal perception. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 653, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhao, X.; Qiu, X.; Xu, J.; Hou, Y. Review of Research Methods for Green Spatial Behavioral Activities and Environmental Cognition. Landsc. Archit. 2020, 27, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jorgensen, A.; Hitchmough, J.; Calvert, T. Woodland spaces and edges: Their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2002, 60, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rodiek, S.D.; Fried, J.T. Access to the outdoors: Using photographic comparison to assess preferences of assisted living residents. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 73, 184–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sullivan, W.C.; Lovell, S.T. Improving the visual quality of commercial development at the rural–urban fringe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 77, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ye, L.; Jiang, L.; Han, G. Research on User Perception Evaluation of Urban Parks Based on Text Sentiment Analysis: Taking 36 Parks In Chongqing as an Example. J. Hum. Settl. West China 2022, 37, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, J.; Obracht-Prondzynska, H.; Kamrowska-Zaluska, D.; Sun, Y.; Li, L. The image of the City on social media: A comparative study using “Big Data” and “Small Data” methods in the Tri-City Region in Poland. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2021, 206, 103977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wan, C.; Shen, G.Q.; Choi, S. Eliciting users’ preferences and values in urban parks: Evidence from analyzing social media data from Hong Kong. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 62, 127172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kong, L.Q.; Liu, Z.F.; Pan, X.H.; Wang, Y.H.; Guo, X.; Wu, J.G. How do different types and landscape attributes of urban parks affect visitors? positive emotions? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 226, 104482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bubalo, M.; Zanten, B.T.V.; Verburg, P.H. Crowdsourcing geo-information on landscape perceptions and preferences: A review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2019, 184, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Park, S.B.; Kim, J.; Lee, Y.K.; Ok, C.M. Visualizing theme park visitors’ emotions using social media analytics and geospatial analytics. Tour. Manag. 2020, 80, 104127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.J.; Zhang, T.Z.; Zeng, Y.X.; Yu, C.; Zheng, S.Q. The rising and heterogeneous demand for urban green space by Chinese urban residents: Evidence from Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 313, 127781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zheng, S. Environmental Sustainability in Urban China. In Chinese Cities in the 21st Century; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 255–275. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hand, K.L.; Freeman, C.; Seddon, P.J.; Recio, M.R.; Stein, A.; Van Heezik, Y. The importance of urban gardens in supporting children’s biophilia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Plunz, R.A.; Zhou, Y.; Vintimilla, M.I.C.; Mckeown, K.; Yu, T.; Uguccioni, L.; Sutto, M.P. Twitter sentiment in New York City parks as measure of well-being. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2019, 189, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sullivan, W.C.; Kuo, F.E.; Depooter, S.F. The Fruit of Urban Nature: Vital Neighborhood Spaces. Environ. Behav. 2004, 36, 678–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Crompton, J. Parks and Economic Development: PAS Report 502; American Planning Association: Chicago, IL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  30. Votsis, A. Planning for green infrastructure: The spatial effects of parks, forests, and fields on Helsinki’s apartment prices. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 132, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. United Nations. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Civ. Eng. Mag. S. Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng. 2015, 24, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  32. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More ACTIVE People for a Healthier World; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  33. Huai, S.; Van de Voorde, T. Which environmental features contribute to positive and negative perceptions of urban parks? A cross-cultural comparison using online reviews and Natural Language Processing methods. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 218, 104307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ostoić, S.K.; van den Bosch, C.C.K.; Vuletić, D.; Stevanov, M.; Živojinović, I.; Mutabdžija-Bećirović, S.; Lazarević, J.; Stojanova, B.; Blagojević, D.; Stojanovska, M.; et al. Citizens’ perception of and satisfaction with urban forests and green space: Results from selected Southeast European cities. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017, 23, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tratalos, J.A.; Haines-Young, R.; Potschin, M.; Fish, R.; Church, A. Cultural ecosystem services in the UK: Lessons on designing indicators to inform management and policy. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 61, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sreetheran, M.; Van Den Bosch, C.C.K. A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green spaces—A systematic review. Urban For. Urban Green. 2014, 13, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Döhren, P.V.; Haase, D. Ecosystem disservices research: A review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 52, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, F.Z.; Li, F.Y.; Li, S.J.; Long, Y. Deciphering the recreational use of urban parks: Experiments using multi-source big data for all Chinese cities. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 701, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, Y.; Lu, A.Q.; Yang, W.; Tian, Z.S. Investigating factors influencing park visit flows and duration using mobile phone signaling data. Urban For. Urban Green. 2023, 85, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, S.; Zhou, W. Recreational visits to urban parks and factors affecting park visits: Evidence from geotagged social media data. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 180, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koohsari, M.J.; Mavoa, S.; Villanueva, K.; Sugiyama, T.; Badland, H.; Kaczynski, A.T.; Owen, N.; Giles-Corti, B. Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda. Health Place 2015, 33, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kaczynski, A.T.; Besenyi, G.M.; Stanis, S.A.W.; Koohsari, M.J.; Oestman, K.B.; Bergstrom, R.; Potwarka, L.R.; Reis, R.S. Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kaplan, R.; Kaplan, S.; Brown, T. Environmental Preference: A Comparison of Four Domains of Predictors. Environ. Behav. 1989, 21, 509–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Korpela, K.M. Evidence for Rapid Affective Evaluation of Environmental Scenes. Environ. Behav. 2002, 34, 634–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Calvin, W.; Qiping, S.G.; Stella, C. Effects of physical and psychological factors on users’attitudes, use patterns, and perceived benefits toward urban parks. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 51, 126691. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alex, Y.H.L.; Jim, C.Y. Citizen attitude and expectation towards greenspace provision in compact urban milieu. Land Use Policy 2011, 29, 577–586. [Google Scholar]
  47. CPSTF. Physical Activity: Built Environment Approaches Combining Transportation System Interventions with Land Use and Environmental Design. In The Community Guide; 2016; Available online: https://www.thecommunityguide.org/media/pdf/PA-Built-Environments.pdf (accessed on 6 August 2023).
  48. Breda, J.J. Transforming public spaces to promote physical activity—A key contributor to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in Europe. Eur. J. Public Health 2018, 28, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kaźmierczak, A. The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 109, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sang, Å.O.; Knez, I.; Gunnarsson, B.; Hedblom, M. The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used. Urban For. Urban Green. 2016, 18, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moy, P.; Murphy, J. Problems and Prospects in Survey Research. J. Mass Commun. Q. 2016, 93, 16–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ewing, R. Using a Visual Preference Survey in Transit Design. Public Work. Manag. Policy 2001, 5, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hooman, F.A. Public places urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. J. Urban Des. 2022, 27, 605–607. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kaplan, A.M.; Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus. Horiz. 2009, 53, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Boyd, D.M.; Ellison, N.B. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 2008, 13, 210–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Holsapple, C.W.; Hsiao, S.-H.S.; Pakath, R. Business Social Media Analytics: Definition, Benefits, and Challenges. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2014, Savannah, GA, USA, 7–9 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kaplan, S. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 1995, 15, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, T. Co-creating tourism experiences through a traveler’s journey: A perspective article. Tour. Rev. 2020, 75, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hausmann, A.; Toivonen, T.; Slotow, R.; Tenkanen, H.; Moilanen, A.; Heikinheimo, V.; Di Minin, E. Social Media Data Can Be Used to Understand Tourists’ Preferences for Nature-Based Experiences in Protected Areas. Conserv. Lett. 2018, 11, e12343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Z.; Jie, H.; Fu, H.; Wang, L.; Jiang, H.; Ding, L.-Y.; Chen, Y. A social-media-based improvement index for urban renewal. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 137, 108775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dobson, A.S. Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-Representation; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang, Z.; Fu, H.; Jian, Y.; Qureshi, S.; Jie, H.; Wang, L. On the comparative use of social media data and survey data in prioritizing ecosystem services for cost-effective governance. Ecosyst. Serv. 2022, 56, 101446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kim, K.-J. Welfare Activation Strategy for a Urban Park Users. J. Korea Contents Assoc. 2012, 12, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ives, C.D.; Oke, C.; Hehir, A.; Gordon, A.; Wang, Y.; Bekessy, S.A. Capturing residents’ values for urban green space: Mapping, analysis and guidance for practice. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 161, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Siya, C.; Ziling, H.; Haochen, P.; Shuaiqing, W.; Xiaoyu, G. Comparative Study of Park Evaluation Based on Text Analysis of Social Media: A Case Study of 50 Popular Parks in Beijing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12741. [Google Scholar]
  66. Liang, H.L.; Zhang, Q.P. Temporal and spatial assessment of urban park visits from multiple social media data sets: A case study of Shanghai, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 297, 126682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sim, J.; Miller, P.; Swarup, S. Tweeting the High Line Life: A Social Media Lens on Urban Green Spaces. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Systems and Human Land Relations, Ministry of Nature Resource of China. China Urban Vitality Report, 2022. Available online: https://huiyan.baidu.com/cms/report/2022nianduchengshi/index.html (accessed on 11 May 2022).
  69. Li, Y.Y.; Ren, B.T.; Chen, Y.S.; Huang, L.C.; Sun, C.G. Multiscale spatiotemporal dynamics analysis of urban green space: Implications for green space planning in the rapid urbanizing Hefei City, China. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 10, 998111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, Z.; Wang, W.; Xing, X. A study on the relationship between the characteristics and usage of urban park green space and population health. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2021, 45, 223–231. [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang, Z. An Empirical Study on Relationship Between Urban Large Park and Housing Price—A Case in Swan Lake Park of Hefei. J. Anhui Jianzhu Univ. 2020, 28, 100–106. [Google Scholar]
  72. Khder, M.A. Web Scraping or Web Crawling: State of Art, Techniques, Approaches and Application. Int. J. Adv. Soft Comput. Its Appl. 2021, 13, 145–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Saurkar, A.V.; Pathare, K.G.; Gode, S.A. An Overview on Web Scraping Techniques and Tools. Int. J. Future Revolut. Comput. Sci. Commun. Eng. 2018, 4, 363–367. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Z. Tourists’ perceptual presentation of national forest park—A case study of Wujin mountain national forest park. J. For. Res. 2022, 27, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  75. Lin, P.; Chen, L.; Luo, Z. Analysis of Tourism Experience in Haizhu National Wetland Park Based on Web Text. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dai, P.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Z.; Gong, Y.; Hou, H. Perceptions of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Urban Parks Based on Social Network Data. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lin, P.M.C.; Ren, L.; Chen, C. Customers’ Perception of the Authenticity of a Cantonese Restaurant. J. China Tour. Res. 2017, 13, 211–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ríos-Martín, M.Á.; Folgado-Fernández, J.A.; Palos-Sánchez, P.R.; Castejón-Jiménez, P. The Impact of the Environmental Quality of Online Feedback and Satisfaction When Exploring the Critical Factors for Luxury Hotels. Sustainability 2019, 12, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cong, L.; Wu, B.; Morrison, A.M.; Shu, H.; Wang, M. Analysis of wildlife tourism experiences with endangered species: An exploratory study of encounters with giant pandas in Chengdu, China. Tour. Manag. 2013, 40, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ruixue, L.; Jing, X. Factors Affecting Users’ Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 253. [Google Scholar]
  81. Chen, B.; Qiu, Z. Recreational use of urban forest parks-A case study in Fuzhou National Forest Park, China. J. For. Res. 2018, 23, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Peng, Y.; Yue, W. Comparative Evaluation of Guangzhou City Parks: Text Analysis Based on Social Media Data. Landsc. Archit. 2019, 26, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lee, J.-K.; Son, Y. Perception and Appraisal of Urban Park Users Using Text Mining of Google Maps Review—Cases of Seoul Forest, Boramae Park, Olympic Park. J. Korean Inst. Landsc. Archit. 2021, 49, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Song, X.P.; Richards, D.R.; Tan, P.Y. Using social media user attributes to understand human-environment interactions at urban parks. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, X. Research on Western Contemporary Garden Festival Based on the Urban Regeneration—A Case Study of German, the Netherlands and the UK. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2016, 32, 60–66. [Google Scholar]
  86. Jorgensen, B.S.; Stedman, R.C. Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. J. Environ. Psychol. 2001, 21, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Eubanks Owens, P.; Thompson, C.W. Children, Youth and Environments. JSTOR 2008, 18, 293–296. [Google Scholar]
  88. Wong, K.-K.; Domroes, M. The Visual Quality of Urban Park Scenes of Kowloon Park, Hong Kong: Likeability, Affective Appraisal, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2005, 32, 617–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park.
Figure 1. Location of Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park.
Sustainability 15 13771 g001
Figure 2. Word cloud for Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park.
Figure 2. Word cloud for Xiaoyaojin Park and Swan Lake Park.
Sustainability 15 13771 g002
Figure 3. Xiaoyaojin Park semantic network diagram.
Figure 3. Xiaoyaojin Park semantic network diagram.
Sustainability 15 13771 g003
Figure 4. Swan Lake Park semantic network diagram.
Figure 4. Swan Lake Park semantic network diagram.
Sustainability 15 13771 g004
Figure 5. Xiaoyaojin Park: (a) network diagram of the positive sentiments, (b) network diagram of the negative sentiments.
Figure 5. Xiaoyaojin Park: (a) network diagram of the positive sentiments, (b) network diagram of the negative sentiments.
Sustainability 15 13771 g005
Figure 6. Swan Lake Park: (a) network diagram of the positive sentiments, (b) network diagram of the negative sentiments.
Figure 6. Swan Lake Park: (a) network diagram of the positive sentiments, (b) network diagram of the negative sentiments.
Sustainability 15 13771 g006
Table 1. Number of comments on the downtown parks.
Table 1. Number of comments on the downtown parks.
Name of ParkNumber of Comments
DianPingCtripMafengwoQunar
Xiaoyaojin Park2346111263454
Swan Lake Park1054226103
Table 2. Type of comments on Chinese local life service websites.
Table 2. Type of comments on Chinese local life service websites.
Name of WebsitesXiaoyaojin ParkSwan Lake Park
PositiveModerateNegativePositiveModerateNegative
DianPing168724350990407
Ctrip90718520187372
Mafengwo12021048910
Qunar5040300
Table 3. High-frequency vocabulary of Xiaoyaojin Park web text analysis.
Table 3. High-frequency vocabulary of Xiaoyaojin Park web text analysis.
RankingHigh-Frequency WordsFrequencyRankingHigh-Frequency WordsFrequency
1Xiaoyaojin Park197631elephant slide186
2Hefei108732entertainment180
3facilities60733playground170
4recreation39034sight169
5Zhang Liao37335large167
6pedestrian street34936friends166
7children33637go in164
8recreation program32838weather151
9Ferris wheel30439fee149
10suit30440first time146
11remodel28941stroll144
12environment27942corsair129
13childhood27043bumper car125
14Three Kingdoms period26744inside124
15play24245admission gate124
16free24046take pictures122
17ticket23247scenery116
18memory22948restart112
19teenager22949carousel111
20good21950nearby111
21weekend21451leisure111
22ponder21452Sun Quan109
23history20053Hefei people109
24rowing boat20054Xiaoyaojin108
25walk19855convenience108
26past19356formidable107
27night19157fun106
28time19158various105
29line up19059Huaihe Road104
30landscaping18760open101
Note: Due to limited space, only the top 60 high-frequency words are listed.
Table 4. High-frequency vocabulary of Swan Lake Park web text analysis.
Table 4. High-frequency vocabulary of Swan Lake Park web text analysis.
RankingHigh-Frequency WordsFrequencyRankingHigh-Frequency WordsFrequency
1Swan Lake80931Wanda76
2Hefei47432Anhui74
3park33033teenager73
4sandy shore31134beautiful69
5night28535air69
6walk24636nearby67
7lakeside22037sight65
8Light Show17538exercise63
9environment15339running63
10suit14940boisterous61
11excellent14141television station60
12scenery12242lighting59
13swans11443take pictures57
14surrounding11144resident56
15center11045time56
16summer10846nice55
17city central
business district
10847landmark54
18weather10448subway53
19nightscape10049stroll52
20square9750comfortable52
21children9651lovers50
22swimming9452past50
23artificial9353fitness48
24convenience8454PRC National Day48
25leisure8055sports48
26large7956parking space47
27weekend7857happy47
28sand7858satisfied45
29traffic7759play45
30buildings7660shopping mall45
Note: due to limited space, only the top 60 high-frequency words are listed.
Table 5. Xiaoyaojin Park perceived content system.
Table 5. Xiaoyaojin Park perceived content system.
Main CategorySubcategoryConnotationCorresponding Review Text ExamplePoints
Landscape
Attractions
26.92%
Natural
landscapes
67.65%
Natural or artificial flora and fauna landscapeBeautiful scenery, variety of flowers, lake clarity, luxuriant green, diversity of bird species, etc.2384
Artificial
landscapes
32.35%
Buildings, bridge, sculptures, artesian wells, etc., in a man-made landscapeArchway, small creek promenade, sculpture, trestle bridge, winding corridor, gallery, etc.730
Featured
Environments
11.21%
Climatic
conditions
26.16%
Seasons, weather, temperature, and humidityLate autumn, summer, spring, rain, weekend, cool, suitable temperature, etc.367
Landscape
features
56.31%
Landscape with Three Kingdoms cultural themePavilion platform building, Dujin Bridge, Xiaoyao Pavilion, cenotaph, etc.790
Smells
and sounds
17.53%
The smell and sound in the parkGood environment, fresh air, urban green lungs, many negative ions, noisy, etc.246
Service
Facilities
33.30%
Location
conditions
42.34%
Geographical accessibilitySubway stations, buses, convenient transportation, pedestrian street, Huaihe Road, etc.1756
Facility
services
57.76%
Infrastructure and ancillary facilities provided according to the functional needs of tourists for rest and entertainmentFerris wheel, elephant slide, playground, pirate ship, bumper car, carousel, tickets are too expensive, admission free, open all day, etc.2624
Recreation
Activities
28.57%
Recreation
time
22.32%
Time for residents to visit the parkChildhood, weekend, past, night, etc.798
Recreational
crowds
17.79%
Classification of residents in the parkChild, little friends, friends, old people, Hefei people, etc.836
Recreational
behaviour
59.89%
Residents’ activities in the parkStroll, recalling the past, playing in the amusement park, line up, etc.2141
Table 6. Swan Lake Park perceived content system.
Table 6. Swan Lake Park perceived content system.
Main CategorySubcategoryConnotationCorresponding Review Text ExamplePoints
Landscape
Attractions
33.79%
Natural
landscapes
88.24%
Natural or artificial flora and fauna landscape.Beautiful scenery, variety of flowers, lake clarity, luxuriant green, diversity of bird species, etc.1576
Artificial
landscapes
11.76%
Buildings, bridge, sculptures, artesian wells, etc., in a man-made landscapeArchway, small creek promenade, sculpture, trestle bridge, winding corridor, gallery, etc.210
Featured
Environments
15.30%
Climatic
conditions
5.69%
Seasons, weather, temperature, and humidityLate autumn, summer, spring, rain, weekend, cool, suitable temperature, etc.46
Landscape
features
86.03%
Landscape with swan lakePavilion platform building, Dujin Bridge, Xiaoyao Pavilion, cenotaph, etc.696
Smells
and sounds
8.28%
The smell and sound in the parkGood environment, fresh air, urban green lungs, many negative ions, noisy, etc.67
Service
Facilities
24.10%
Location
conditions
88.15%
Geographical accessibilitySubway stations, buses, convenient transportation, pedestrian street, Huaihe Road, etc.1123
Facility
services
11.85%
Infrastructure and ancillary facilities provided according to the functional needs of tourists for rest and entertainmentFerris wheel, elephant slide, playground, pirate ship, bumper car, carousel, tickets are too expensive, admission free, open all day, etc.151
Recreation
Activities
26.81%
Recreation
time
36.62%
Time for residents to visit the parkChildhood, weekend, past, night, etc.519
Recreational
crowds
19.41%
Classification of residents in the parkChild, little friends, friends, old people, Hefei people, etc.275
Recreational
behaviour
43.97%
Residents’ activities in the parkStroll, recalling the past, playing in the amusement park, line up, etc.623
Table 7. The residents’ emotional attitudes.
Table 7. The residents’ emotional attitudes.
Emotional AttitudeXiaoyaojin Park (Old Downtown)Swan Lake Park (New Downtown)
NumberPercentage%NumberPercentage%
positive224845.92135759.13
moderate102921.0278033.99
negative161933.071586.88
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, D.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, T.; Shui, T. Aspects of New and Old Urban Parks Most Valued by Residents on Social Media: A Case Study in Hefei. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13771. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813771

AMA Style

Ma D, Zhang S, Xiao T, Shui T. Aspects of New and Old Urban Parks Most Valued by Residents on Social Media: A Case Study in Hefei. Sustainability. 2023; 15(18):13771. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813771

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Dongfang, Shaojie Zhang, Tieqiao Xiao, and Taotao Shui. 2023. "Aspects of New and Old Urban Parks Most Valued by Residents on Social Media: A Case Study in Hefei" Sustainability 15, no. 18: 13771. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813771

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop