Research on the Supervision and Implementation System of Territorial Space Planning from the Perspective of Resilience

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors

Is your article a review article?

If it is a review article, the structure of the article should be significantly improved. The information in different sections should be presented in a more concise manner. It is also necessary to discuss future research directions in each section. In the review article, the method of initial and final selection of articles and information extraction should be presented. What information databases are used?...

Information from the discussion section should be presented before the conclusion section.

Before evaluating and reviewing the details of the article, these general corrections should be applied to the article.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Research on the Supervision and Implementation System of Territorial Spatial Planning from the Perspective of Resilience

 

Specific comments:

1.     You used different words for the same terms: For example, you used "territorial space" and "territorial space" elsewhere. What is territorial spatial mean? Is spatial different from territorial? See keyword.

2.     Some of the abbreviations were not defined. For example, see 'ARPIRE' in the abstract. After that, check all the text for the same problems.

3.     It is necessary to punctuate and check some spelling or spacing mistakes.

4.     I didn't understand some sentences mean: For example: "The limited availability of urban land forces most cities to adopt a development strategy of expanding outward, which disrupts the coordination of the surrounding agricultural or forest areas in the short term". I saw the same issues in other parts of the text. To ensure that everything is clear and readable internationally, I believe it's important for your manuscript to be checked by native English experts.

5.     I think it is better to review literature and add it to the introduction. Your paper will not be read by your country people, but it will be seen by other people worldwide. What is your study innovation in comparing the study literature?

6.     What is your methodology of research? Every study has its own research methods.\

7.     I think the text is long and no one will read it. So you can see most of your references are local and perhaps it's interested in your county readers. When I read the text it is not very readable and clear for me. I am curious about how to find answers to these questions based on the title of your paper:

·       What is the current structure and nature of spatial planning in China?

·       What are the main challenges of spatial planning in China that motivated you to focus on this topic? (You have done in introduction).

·       Resilience of territory for what? What types of problems are you referring to?

8.     I find the text to be very long, and it is very difficult to understand what you want to say. My suggestion is to summarize and revise the text so that it is understandable for a person who is not familiar with the Chinese planning system.

9.     The terms 'planning system', 'planning monitoring', and 'planning monitoring goals' are unfamiliar to readers. It is better to briefly show the planning system in China and the planning monitoring goals, as well as nature.

10.  To begin the discussion, it's important to present the key findings and discuss them first. Check with previous search results as well. Then focus on conclusion.

11.  What were the limitations of your study? Write about it in the discussion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

 

This paper possesses the potential to significantly enhance territorial spatial planning to improve resilience. However, to enhance the excellence and importance of your research, I kindly urge you to diligently address each comment provided in my evaluation on a section-by-section basis.

First and foremost, it is essential to address a clarity issue in this paper regarding whether the proposed System of Territorial Spatial Planning from the Perspective of Resilience is intended as a general framework or specifically targeted for China. It is crucial to clearly state this distinction throughout all sections of the paper to avoid confusion among readers.

1.Introduction

·       In order to improve the clarity and flow of the introduction, it is suggested to restructure it. Begin by providing a concise definition or explanation of 'resilience' early in the introduction to ensure understanding for readers unfamiliar with this term in its specific context. Following that, address how most existing literature on resilience has primarily focused on urban scale considerations while giving less attention to regional and territorial scales, which highlights a research gap. Next, discuss the importance of territorial scale in relation to resilience before introducing the case study focusing on China and emphasizing why territorial spatial resilience is crucial for this country's context.

·       Incorporating more citations and references to support your arguments, especially in the third paragraph, would enhance the credibility of this section. It is important to provide proper attribution for the information presented.

·       While mentioning the ARPIRE framework by Woolf, consider briefly explaining the acronym for clarity.

·       Clarify the difference between the "parallel planning" mechanism and the current system in China. This reference may be unclear to international readers or those unfamiliar with China's planning history.

·       You mentioned challenges like overexploitation of resources, environmental damage, and conflicts over land use. Consider giving specific examples or case studies for these challenges to enhance the reader's understanding and engagement.

2. The connotation of supervision over implementing resilient territorial space

·       The use of technical strategies, like the drought and flood warning model, provides a practical approach to achieving resilience. It might be beneficial to include some case studies or specific examples to illustrate how these models work in practice.

·       There might be a need to further elaborate on the "comprehensive analysis model of dual evaluation and dual assessment" and explain its relevance in the given context.

·       The mention of the "three zones and three lines" protection appears significant, but might need a brief introduction or clarification for readers unfamiliar with the term.

·       It would be advantageous to elaborate a bit more on the "adaptive active cycle mechanism." While the importance of this mechanism is hinted at, a deeper dive might offer readers a clearer picture of its role in enhancing resilience.

·       The conclusion could further emphasize the key takeaways from this section and its implications for territorial spatial planning practices. Particularly, I recommend explaining Figure 1 in more detail, and how it relates to the following sections of your paper.

3. The expression and effectiveness of resilience thinking in domestic and international planning monitoring

·       Before commencing section 3.1, it is advisable to provide a concise summary of the topics that will be covered in this section.

3.1The expression of resilience thinking in planning monitoring

 ·       While there is a reference to Zhang et al., 2019, it would be beneficial to provide more citations, especially when discussing specific laws or reforms in different countries. This would give readers confidence in the authenticity of the information and offer a resource for further reading.

·        ·    Before proceeding to section 3.2, it is advisable to include a transitional paragraph that establishes a logical connection between the previous sections and the upcoming content. This will enhance the overall flow of the document and facilitate comprehension for readers.

3.2 The effectiveness of planning monitoring in enhancing resilience

·       The primary focus of this section is on the investigation of ecological and social resilience in spatial space. However, it is important to also consider the economic dimension. I strongly suggest incorporating this dimension into the section to ensure comprehensiveness. Additionally, instead of examining these dimensions separately, it would be beneficial to provide a synthesis of ecological, social, and economic aspects at the end of this section for a more holistic understanding.

3.3 The deficiencies in the current planning monitoring

·       This section primarily examines the global scale, but it is crucial to also examine the deficiencies in China's planning monitoring systems. Since your ultimate goal appears to be proposing a system for China, it is essential to investigate and address these specific concerns.

·       Table 1 summarizes what you have mentioned in section 3. Before this table, you should explain what this table shows, and what is the purpose of this table. Moreover, adding citations to the contents mentioned in this table is necessary.

Discussion

·       ·       I recommend separating the discussion and conclusion sections and putting the discussion before the conclusion.

 

·       The need for comparative studies between China and the West is mentioned but not deeply explored. Offering insights into why such studies are crucial, or highlighting potential areas of comparison, could enhance the depth of the discussion.

·       When mentioning the integration of multiple disciplines for resilient territorial spatial planning, it would be beneficial to specify which disciplines. This would provide a clearer perspective on the interdisciplinary nature of the subject.

·       The emphasis on collaboration among stakeholders is a crucial point. It might be helpful to delve deeper into strategies or methodologies that facilitate such collaboration.

·       The discussion makes several claims and observations that would benefit from references or citations, adding credibility to the assertions.

·       The discussion could benefit from a succinct wrap-up or concluding paragraph that synthesizes the main points and indicates your paper’s contributions.

·       While the discussion delves deep into theoretical aspects, there's a scope to discuss the practical implications or real-world applications of integrating resilience into spatial planning and monitoring, especially in the Chinese context.

 

Conclusion

·       ·       While the conclusion offers various suggestions and observations, a succinct summarizing statement or two encapsulating the core message of the research would provide a more definitive closure to the paper.

 

·       Given the paper's focus on resilience in spatial planning, offering more concrete steps or strategies for enhancing resilience would strengthen the conclusion. For instance, what are some ways to optimize spatial systems, and how can risk identification be enhanced?

·       Briefly reiterating the broader implications of these conclusions, especially in a real-world context, could highlight the significance of the study.

·       While the conclusion does offer a look into the future of planning, explicitly highlighting future challenges or potential areas of further research would set the stage for subsequent investigations on the topic.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

All comments have been addressed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

There are still several extensive paragraphs across the paper without or with only one citation for the whole paragraph. I recommend the authors add more citations if possible because relying on a single or no citation may lead to perceptions of unsubstantiated claims. Multiple citations can enrich the argument's depth, showcase a comprehensive literature review, and bolster the paper's credibility and trustworthiness among readers and reviewers.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf