A Study of Solar Power Usage in the Southern Region of Pakistan
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. Performance Expectancy (PE)
2.2. Effort Expectancy (EE)
2.3. Environmental Belief (EVB)
2.4. Social Influence
2.5. Hedonic Motivation (HM)
2.6. Price Value (PV)
2.7. Facilitating Condition (FC)
2.8. Attitude towards Use (ATU)
2.9. Perceive Behaviour (PBC)
2.10. Behaviour Intention (BI)
2.11. Switching Behaviour (SW)
3. Methodology
3.1. Questionnaire
3.2. Participants
3.3. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM)
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Model
4.2. Structural Equation Model and Its Significance
5. Discussion and Contributions
6. Conclusions, Limitations, and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Solangi, K.H.; Saidur, R.; Luhur, M.R.; Aman, M.M.; Badarudin, A.; Kazi, S.N.; Lwin, T.N.W.; Rahim, N.A.; Islam, M.R. Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia: Users’ perspective. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2015, 17, 1975–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urpelainen, J.; Yoon, S. Solar home systems for rural India: Survey evidence on awareness and willingness to pay from Uttar Pradesh. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2015, 24, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naseem, I.; Khan, J. Impact of Energy Crisis on Economic Growth of Pakistan. Int. J. Afr. Asian Stud. 2015, 7, 33. [Google Scholar]
- Fatai, K.; Oxley, L.; Scrimgeour, F.G. Modelling the causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in New Zealand, Australia, India, Indonesia, The Philippines and Thailand. Math. Comput. Simul. (MATCOM) 2004, 64, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muneer, T.; Maubleu, S.; Asif, M. Prospects of solar water heating for textile industry in Pakistan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2006, 10, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- |Ministry of Finance|Government of Pakistan|.Pakistan Economic Survey 2021–22. 2022. Available online: https://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_2022.html (accessed on 31 July 2022).
- Tribune. Pakistan’s Foray into Renewable Energy. The Express Tribun. Available online: https://tribune.com.pk/story/2393075/pakistans-foray-into-renewable-energy?cv=1 (accessed on 29 December 2022).
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.L.; Xu, X. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Q. 2012, 36, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, F.; Maeng, S.-J.; Cheema, M.J.M.; Anjum, M.N.; Afzal, A.; Azam, M.; Wu, R.-S.; Noor, R.S.; Umair, M.; Iqbal, T. Solar Irrigation Potential, Key Issues and Challenges in Pakistan. Water 2023, 15, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, Y.A.; Rashid, A.; Khurshid, M.M. Investigating the Determinants of the Adoption of Solar Photovoltaic Systems—Citizen’s Perspectives of Two Developing Countries. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mustafa, Z.; Iqbal, R.; Siraj, M.; Hussain, I. Cost–Benefit Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Energy System in Agriculture Sector of Quetta, Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 23, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aravindan, K.L.; Thurasamy, R.; Raman, M.; Ilhavenil, N.; Annamalah, S.; Rathidevi, A.S. Modeling Awareness as the Crux in Solar Energy Adoption Intention through Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.; Mohapatra, S. Problems of Adoption of Solar Power and Subsequent Switching Behavior: An Exploration in India. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2021. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Solangi, Y.A.; Zameer, H.; Shah, S.A.A. Off-Grid Solar PV Power Generation System in Sindh, Pakistan: A Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis. Processes 2019, 7, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andres, L. Designing and Doing Survey Research, 1st ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Roscoe, J.T. Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences; Roscoe, J.T., Ed.; Holt, Rinehart and Winston; New York, NY, USA, 1975; References-Scientific Research Publishing. (n.d.); Available online: https://www.scirp.org/%28S%28lz5mqp453edsnp55rrgjct55%29%29/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=1691933 (accessed on 1 March 2016).
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson: New York, NY, USA, 2010; Available online: https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1841396 (accessed on 27 July 2016).
- Beran, T.N.; Violato, C. Structural equation modeling in Medical Research: A primer. BMC Res. Notes 2010, 3, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prasetyo, Y.T.; Tanto, H.; Mariyanto, M.; Hanjaya, C.; Young, M.N.; Persada, S.F.; Miraja, B.A.; Redi, A.A.N.P. Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Online Food Delivery Service during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Its Relation with Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, K. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 2012, 175, 828–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Mena, J.A. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2012, 40, 414–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Cheah, J.H.; Ting, H.; Moisescu, O.I.; Radomir, L. Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tour. Econ. 2020, 26, 531–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, X.J.; Ng, S.I.; Chuah, F.; Cham, T.H.; Rozali, A. I see, and I hunt: The link between gastronomy online reviews, involvement and behavioural intention towards ethnic food. Br. Food J. 2019, 122, 1777–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purohit, S.; Arora, R.; Paul, J. The bright side of online consumer behavior: Continuance intention for mobile payments. J. Consum. Behav. 2022, 21, 523–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinartz, W.; Haenlein, M.; Henseler, J. An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2009, 26, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, F.J., Jr.; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L.; Kuppelwieser, V.G. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Eur. Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbar, A.; Ali, S.; Ahmad, M.A.; Akbar, M.; Danish, M. Understanding the Antecedents of Organic Food Consumption in Pakistan: Moderating Role of Food Neophobia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taber, K.S. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Res. Sci. Educ. 2017, 48, 1273–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekti, D.B.M.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Redi, A.A.N.P.; Budiman, A.S.; Mandala, I.M.P.L.; Putra, A.R.; Persada, S.F.; Nadlifatin, R.; Young, M.N. Determining Factors Affecting Customer Intention to Use Rooftop Solar Photovoltaics in Indonesia. Sustainability 2021, 14, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breiman, L.; Friedman, J.H. Estimating Optimal Transformations for Multiple Regression and Correlation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1985, 80, 580–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 159 | 79.5 |
Female | 41 | 20.5 |
Age (in years) | ||
Under 18 | 1 | 0.5 |
18 to 24 | 50 | 25.0 |
25 to 34 | 88 | 44.0 |
35 to 44 | 46 | 23.0 |
45 to 54 | 10 | 5.0 |
55 to 64 | 4 | 2.0 |
65 and above | 1 | 0.5 |
Education | ||
Middle School | 1 | 0.5 |
Intermediate | 5 | 2.5 |
Graduation | 92 | 46 |
Post-graduation | 102 | 51.0 |
Occupation | ||
Govt. Servant | 32 | 16.0 |
Private Sector | 104 | 52.0 |
Retired | 1 | 0.5 |
Self Employed | 16 | 8.0 |
Student | 39 | 19.5 |
Unemployed | 8 | 4.0 |
Monthly Family Income (in USD) | ||
Below 250 | 30 | 15.0 |
251 to 375 | 43 | 21.5 |
376 to 625 | 60 | 30.0 |
626 to 1000 | 33 | 16.5 |
1001 to 1500 | 15 | 7.5 |
More than 1500 | 19 | 9.5 |
Marital Status | ||
Divorced | 3 | 1.5 |
Married | 95 | 47.5 |
Single | 101 | 50.5 |
Widowed | 1 | 0.5 |
Knowledge About Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy | ||
Maybe | 18 | 9.0 |
No | 35 | 17.5 |
Yes | 147 | 73.5 |
Residential Area (District) | ||
Karachi East | 57 | 28.5 |
Karachi West | 11 | 5.5 |
Karachi South | 15 | 7.5 |
Karachi Central | 45 | 22.5 |
Malir | 30 | 15.0 |
Korangi | 14 | 7.0 |
Badin | 2 | 1.0 |
Dadu | 2 | 1.0 |
Hyderabad | 8 | 4.0 |
Kashmore | 1 | 0.5 |
Khairpur | 1 | 0.5 |
Larkana | 3 | 1.5 |
Sukkur | 1 | 0.5 |
TandoAllahyar | 5 | 2.5 |
Tharparkar | 3 | 1.5 |
Umerkot | 2 | 1.0 |
Monthly Energy Consumption (in kilowatt-hours) | ||
0 to 200 | 23 | 11.5 |
200 to 300 | 63 | 31.5 |
300 to 400 | 48 | 24.0 |
400 to 500 | 30 | 15.0 |
More than 500 | 36 | 18.0 |
Measures | Factor Loading | Cronbach’s Alpha | Average Variance Reliability (AVE) | Composite Reliability (CR) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Performance expectancy | 0.773 | 0.595 | 0.854 | |
PE1: Solar PV is a practical alternative to conventional energy. | 0.713 | |||
PE2: Solar PV will be more useful in my everyday life. | 0.842 | |||
PE3: Solar panels, in my view, are an easy-to-use technology. | 0.716 | |||
PE4: Solar panels, in my opinion, will reduce my electricity bill. | 0.806 | |||
Effort expectancy | 0.826 | 0.656 | 0.884 | |
EE1: It is easy to Install solar PV in my home | 0.785 | |||
EE2: Maintenance of solar PV is simple | 0.797 | |||
EE3: My home appliances will perform fine with solar panels. | 0.804 | |||
EE4: It is simple for me to understand the use of solar PV on home appliances in my home. | 0.851 | |||
Environmental belief | 0.743 | 0.566 | 0.838 | |
EVB1: Not enough is being accomplished to reduce climate change. | 0.615 | |||
EVB2: Each one of us is responsible for reducing climate change. | 0.77 | |||
EVB3: Solar PV, in my opinion, is an environment-friendly technology. | 0.834 | |||
EVB4: Solar PV will reduce global warming/ climate change. | 0.773 | |||
Social influence | 0.855 | 0.698 | 0.902 | |
SI1: I always take advice from friends about their experiences before deciding to buy a new product. | 0.75 | |||
SI2: On the off chance that my friends have a decent interest in solar panels, I am probably going to be keen on buying one as well. | 0.887 | |||
SI3: People I value (family and friends) will advise me to use solar panels. | 0.851 | |||
SI4: I will tell my friends and neighbours about solar PV. | 0.847 | |||
Hedonic motivation | 0.787 | 0.609 | 0.862 | |
HM1: It will be an exciting experience to install solar PV. | 0.774 | |||
HM2: I would be happy to be the first person in my area to install solar PV. | 0.783 | |||
HM3: Buying and installing solar panels at my home made me happy. | 0.76 | |||
HM4: I enjoy being the first to try out new items. | 0.805 | |||
Price value | 0.7 | 0.516 | 0.808 | |
PV1: The use of solar panels lowers the price of electricity. | 0.759 | |||
PV2: My aspiration to use solar panels will increase if the government provides a subsidy. | 0.833 | |||
PV3: When solar panels are more expensive than conventional electrical energy, I will be hesitant to use them. | 0.638 | |||
PV4: Electricity prices, in my opinion, should be reasonable. | 0.623 | |||
Facilitating condition | 0.7 | 0.522 | 0.812 | |
FC1: I have enough/usable space in my home to install solar panels. | 0.672 | |||
FC2: I know enough about solar panels to make an informed decision. | 0.831 | |||
FC3: When I have a problem with the solar panel, I can instantly receive assistance. | 0.718 | |||
FC4: Solar PV should work with the other technologies I am already using. | 0.655 | |||
Perceived behaviour | 0.7 | 0.618 | 0.829 | |
PBC1: Permission to install solar panels in my home is simple for me. | 0.800 | |||
PBC2: Solar PV providers are easily available in my area. | 0.749 | |||
PBC3: I will be more interested in using solar panels if I have the facilities, possibilities, and understanding of them. | 0.808 | |||
Attitude towards use | 0.88 | 0.678 | 0.913 | |
ATU1: Solar power system is a future evolution. | 0.819 | |||
ATU2: This is the right time to use a solar power system. | 0.863 | |||
ATU3: Solar power system is a clean source of energy. | 0.879 | |||
ATU4: Overall, I enjoy using solar power systems as a source of electricity. | 0.728 | |||
ATU5: I intend to use a solar power system | 0.821 | |||
Behaviour intention | 0.815 | 0.844 | 0.916 | |
BI1: I would like to use solar PV in the future. | 0.916 | |||
BI2: When provided further information, I am interested in using solar PV at my home. | 0.922 | |||
Switching behaviour | 0.85 | 0.768 | 0.909 | |
SW1: Shortly, I am likely to use solar PV instead of traditional electricity sources for my household needs. | 0.901 | |||
SW2: Shortly, I will probably use solar PV to partially replace traditional electricity sources. | 0.883 | |||
SW3: Shortly, I will probably replace all my household’s energy needs with solar PV rather than traditional sources. | 0.845 |
Factor | PE | EE | EVB | SI | HM | PV | FC | PBC | ATU | BI | SW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PE | 0.771 | ||||||||||
EE | 0.497 | 0.810 | |||||||||
EVB | 0.593 | 0.387 | 0.752 | ||||||||
SI | 0.608 | 0.471 | 0.515 | 0.836 | |||||||
HM | 0.463 | 0.457 | 0.417 | 0.528 | 0.781 | ||||||
PV | 0.512 | 0.406 | 0.517 | 0.473 | 0.574 | 0.719 | |||||
FC | 0.362 | 0.605 | 0.344 | 0.437 | 0.467 | 0.415 | 0.722 | ||||
PBC | 0.479 | 0.614 | 0.446 | 0.585 | 0.525 | 0.533 | 0.560 | 0.786 | |||
ATU | 0.611 | 0.482 | 0.613 | 0.667 | 0.666 | 0.682 | 0.468 | 0.657 | 0.823 | ||
BI | 0.541 | 0.422 | 0.542 | 0.572 | 0.645 | 0.612 | 0.441 | 0.673 | 0.800 | 0.919 | |
SW | 0.459 | 0.394 | 0.464 | 0.507 | 0.592 | 0.545 | 0.404 | 0.580 | 0.788 | 0.763 | 0.877 |
Proposed Hypothesis | p | Results | |
---|---|---|---|
H1: Performance Expectancy → Attitude Towards Use | 0.083 | 0.187 | Non-Significant |
H2: Effort Expectancy → Attitude Towards Use | 0.028 | 0.585 | Non-Significant |
H3: Environmental Belief → Attitude Towards Use | 0.178 | 0.002 | Significant |
H4: Social Influence → Attitude Towards Use | 0.249 | 0.000 | Significant |
H5: Hedonic Motivation →Attitude Towards Use | 0.252 | 0.000 | Significant |
H6: Price Value →Attitude Towards Use | 0.274 | 0.000 | Significant |
H7: Facilitating Condition → Perceived Behaviour | 0.560 | 0.000 | Significant |
H8: Attitude Towards Use → Behaviour Intention | 0.629 | 0.000 | Significant |
H9: Perceived Behaviour →Behaviour Intention | 0.260 | 0.000 | Significant |
H10: Behaviour Intention → Switching Behaviour | 0.763 | 0.000 | Significant |
Eqn. | Predictor | Structure Model Equation | R Square |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Attitude Towards Use (ATU) | ATU = 0.178EVB + 0.249SI + 0.252HM + 0.274PV | 69.4% |
2 | Perceived Behaviour Control (PBC) | PBC = 0.56FC | 31.4% |
3 | Behaviour Intention (BI) | BI = 0.629ATU + 0.26PBC | 67.8% |
4 | Switching Behaviour (SW) | SW = 0.763BI | 58.2% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hashmi, S.T.A.; Raees, F.; Baig, M.M. A Study of Solar Power Usage in the Southern Region of Pakistan. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115344
Hashmi STA, Raees F, Baig MM. A Study of Solar Power Usage in the Southern Region of Pakistan. Sustainability. 2023; 15(21):15344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115344
Chicago/Turabian StyleHashmi, Syed Tauqeer Ahmed, Fahim Raees, and Mirza Mahmood Baig. 2023. "A Study of Solar Power Usage in the Southern Region of Pakistan" Sustainability 15, no. 21: 15344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115344
APA StyleHashmi, S. T. A., Raees, F., & Baig, M. M. (2023). A Study of Solar Power Usage in the Southern Region of Pakistan. Sustainability, 15(21), 15344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115344