Examining the Impact of Crowding Perception on the Generation of Negative Emotions among Users of Small Urban Micro Public Spaces
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis
2.1. Perceived Crowding
2.2. Emotional Response and Arousal Theory
2.3. Stimulus–Organism–Response (SOR) Model
2.4. Environmental Attractiveness, User Sentiment, and Revisit Intentions
2.5. EEG (Electroencephalogram) Emotional Response
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Area
3.2. Participants
3.3. Instruments
3.3.1. Questionnaire Design
3.3.2. Physiological Instrument: Emotiv EPOC-Based EEG Data Collection
3.3.3. Experimental Design
3.3.4. Data Analysis Tools and Methods
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
4.2. Measurement Model Validation
4.3. Structural Model Testing
4.4. Moderated Mediation Effect
4.5. EEG Emotional Arousal Results
5. Discussion
5.1. Crowding Perception on Emotional Arousal
5.2. Relationship between Perception of Crowding and Mood and Revisit Intention
5.3. Implications for Urban Sustainability
5.4. Limitations of the Study and Future Perspectives
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- Questionnaire
- A. Crowding Perception.
- A1. Crowded road.
- A2. Crowded rest areas.
- A3. Crowded play areas.
- A4. Crowded cultural/artistic areas.
- A5. Weekends are too crowded for me to experience.
- A6. Weekday daytime was too crowded for my experience.
- A7. Weekday evenings are too crowded for me to feel comfortable with my experience.
- A8. Too much contact with other visitors makes me feel depressed and anxious.
- A9. Too many people affect the effectiveness of self-regulation of negative emotions.
- A10. Too many people spoil the quiet environment.
- B. Positive emotions.
- B1. Here I feel pleasure.
- B2. Here I feel excited and active.
- B3. Here I feel passionate.
- B4. Here I feel focused.
- B5. Here I feel relaxed.
- C. Negativity emotions.
- C1. Here I feel impatient.
- C2. Here I feel restless.
- C3. Here I feel upset and angry.
- C4. Here I feel sorry for myself.
- C5. Here I feel anxious.
- D. Environmental Attraction.
- D1. The natural environment appeals to me.
- D2. The space to move around attracts me.
- D3. The pleasant climate is breathtaking and it makes me crave it.
- D4. The social atmosphere attracts me.
- D5. The unique culture and artistic behavior attract me.
- D6. The children’s rides appeal to me and I would love to take my children there.
- E. Intent to Revisit
- I’ll come to the UMPS area again.
References
- Yang, B.; Hong, B. Pocket park in urban regeneration of China: Policy and perspective. City Environ. Interact. 2023, 19, 100109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Lu, X.; Dai, X.; Zhai, F.; Du, H.; Xie, C.; Gao, X.; Yang, D.; Ji, D. The Function of Urban Green Space in Avoiding Disasters in Central Shanghai, China. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2023, 149, 05023017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Kerrebroeck, H.; Brengman, M.; Willems, K. Escaping the crowd: An experimental study on the impact of a Virtual Reality experience in a shopping mall. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 77, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Magalhaes, C.; Trigo, S.F. Contracting out publicness: The private management of the urban public realm and its implications. Prog. Plan. 2017, 115, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J. Micro-regeneration in Shanghai and the public-isation of space. Habitat Int. 2023, 132, 102741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popovski, H.; Young, A. Small things in everyday places: Homelessness, dissent and affordances in public space. Br. J. Criminol. 2023, 63, 727–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Jia, T.; Greening, U. Humanization of nature: Testing the influences of urban park characteristics and psychological factors on collegers’ perceived restoration. Urban For. Urban Green. 2023, 79, 127806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Q.; Liu, Y.; Qiu, W.; Liu, R.; Li, M. Investigating the impact of perceived micro-level neighborhood characteristics on housing prices in Shanghai. Land 2022, 11, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathi, M.; Ní Laoire, C.; Studies, M. Urban home: Young male migrants constructing home in the city. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 2023, 49, 813–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stokols, D.; Rall, M.; Pinner, B.; Schopler, J. Physical, social, and personal determinants of the perception of crowding. Environ. Behav. 1973, 5, 87. [Google Scholar]
- Westover, T.N.; Collins, J.R., Jr. Perceived crowding in recreation settings: An urban case study. Leis. Sci. 1987, 9, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stemmer, K.; Gjerald, O.; Øgaard, T. Crowding, emotions, visitor satisfaction and loyalty in a managed visitor attraction. Leis. Sci. 2022, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moyle, B.; Croy, G. Crowding and visitor satisfaction during the off-season: Port Campbell National Park. Ann. Leis. Res. 2007, 10, 518–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadinejad, A.; Gardiner, S.; Kralj, A.; Scott, N.; Moyle, B.D.; Management, T. Cognition, metacognition and attitude to tourism destinations: The impact of emotional arousal and source credibility. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2022, 51, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, D.; Gao, Z.J.A. Environmental Effects from Pocket Park Design According to District Planning Patterns—Cases from Xi’an, China. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milman, A.; Tasci, A.D.; Wei, W. Crowded and popular: The two sides of the coin affecting theme-park experience, satisfaction, and loyalty. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2020, 18, 100468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz, C.; Delgado, N.; García-Bello, M.Á.; Hernández-Fernaud, E. Exploring crowding in tourist settings: The importance of physical characteristics in visitor satisfaction. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2021, 20, 100619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engelniederhammer, A.; Papastefanou, G.; Xiang, L. Crowding density in urban environment and its effects on emotional responding of pedestrians: Using wearable device technology with sensors capturing proximity and psychophysiological emotion responses while walking in the street. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 2019, 29, 630–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, D.; Moharana, T.R.; Malik, G. Influence of celebrity, destination and tourist personality on destination attachment and revisit intention: Moderating roles of endorsement embeddedness, destination crowding and gender. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2023, 27, 100754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suhaimi, N.S.; Mountstephens, J.; Teo, J. EEG-based emotion recognition: A state-of-the-art review of current trends and opportunities. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2020, 2020, 8875426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natarajan, T.; Veera Raghavan, D.R. Does pickup service quality explain BOPIS users’ store relationship performance? The moderating role of users’ service experience consciousness. TQM J. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Wang, X.; Law, R.; Zhang, M. Research on the frontier and prospect of service robots in the tourism and hospitality industry based on international core journals: A review. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shan, W.; Xiu, C.; Meng, Y. How to Design Greenway on Urban Land Utilization: Linking Place Preference, Perceived Health Benefit, and Environmental Perception. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, P.F.; Yan, C. Community Meta-Box: A Deployable Micro Space for New Publicness in High-Density City. J. Des. Econ. Innov. 2023, 9, 58–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Y.J. Practical Research on Mixed-PPGIS Promoting Public Participation in Urban Micro-Public Space Renewal. Eng. Proc. 2023, 38, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirvonen, H. Affects on Crowded Trails: A Narrative Study on the Affective Atmosphere of Finnish National Parks during Perceived Crowding. 2021. Available online: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021061838703 (accessed on 9 August 2023).
- Chang, T.-S.; Services, C. Social distancing in retail: Influence of perceived retail crowding and self-efficacy on employees’ perceived risks. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 62, 102613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blut, M.; Iyer, G.R. Consequences of perceived crowding: A meta-analytical perspective. J. Retail. 2020, 96, 362–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simanjuntak, M.; Nur, H.; Sartono, B.; Sabri, M.J. A general structural equation model of the emotions and repurchase intention in modern retail. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 801–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, H.; Wang, G.; Ren, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. The impact of restorative destination environments on tourists’ well-being and environmentally responsible behavior: A Reasonable Person Model. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2022, 44, 101028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, S.; Tengku, T.K.S.; Mahamood, A.F.; Hussin, N.S.; Ramli, A.J.; Ab Rahman, Z. Function of the Neuroscience Aspect in Surah Al-Insyirah and Al-Ankabut in Increasing Happiness and Alleviating Stress During the Post COVID-19 Pandemic Era. J. Pharm. Negat. Results 2022, 13, 2351–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torres, E.N.; Milman, A.; Park, S. Customer delight and outrage in theme parks: A roller coaster of emotions. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2021, 22, 338–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, I.-J.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.S.; Lee, J.C.; Giroux, M. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travelers’ preference for crowded versus non-crowded options. Tour. Manag. 2021, 87, 104398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yin, J.; Cheng, Y.; Bi, Y.; Ni, Y. Tourists perceived crowding and destination attractiveness: The moderating effects of perceived risk and experience quality. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2020, 18, 100489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hahm, J.J.; Kwun, D.J.; Kang, J. Analysis of environmental stimuli, satisfaction, and behavioral responses: An extended Mehrabian-Russell model to alternative golf. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 109, 103407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; So, K.K.F.; Hu, X.; Poomchaisuwan, M. Travel for affection: A stimulus-organism-response model of honeymoon tourism experiences. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2022, 46, 1187–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Nian, S.; Zhang, H. Tourists’ perceptions of crowding, attractiveness, and satisfaction: A second-order structural model. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2017, 22, 1250–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albayrak, T.; Güzel, Ö.; Caber, M.; Kılıçarslan, Ö.; Dursun Cengizci, A.; Güven, A. How does perceived crowding moderate tourist shopping experience and satisfaction relationship? Int. J. Tour. Cities 2021, 7, 46–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, W.; Huang, G.; Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, Z. Video-triggered EEG-emotion public databases and current methods: A survey. Brain Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, 255–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamad, N.; Ruslan, P.W.A.-R.; Shaipudeain, N.N. Motivation and behavioural intention towards urban recreational parks: A case of Putrajaya. Int. J. Leis. Tour. Mark. 2022, 7, 280–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khairi, M.; Darmawan, D. The Relationship Between Destination Attractiveness, Location, Tourism Facilities, And Revisit Intentions. J. Mark. Bus. Res. (MARK) 2021, 1, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Bi, Y.; Zheng, X.-M.; Tsaur, R.-C. Safety forecasting and early warning of highly aggregated tourist crowds in China. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 119026–119040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Zheng, X.-M.; Tsaur, R.-C. Occurrence mechanism and coping paths of accidents of highly aggregated tourist crowds based on system dynamics. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lew, A.A. A framework of tourist attraction research. Ann. Tour. Res. 1987, 14, 553–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herman, K.; Ciechanowski, L.; Przegalińska, A. Emotional well-being in urban wilderness: Assessing states of calmness and alertness in informal green spaces (IGSs) with muse—Portable EEG headband. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cimtay, Y.; Ekmekcioglu, E. Investigating the use of pretrained convolutional neural network on cross-subject and cross-dataset EEG emotion recognition. Sensors 2020, 20, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.M.; Sarkar, A.K.; Hossain, M.A.; Hossain, M.S.; Islam, M.R.; Hossain, M.B.; Quinn, J.M.; Moni, M.A. Recognition of human emotions using EEG signals: A review. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 136, 104696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, L.; Wu, Y.; Han, G.; Liu, H.; Cui, F. Emotional State, Psychological Resilience, and Travel Intention to National Forest Park during COVID-19. Forests 2022, 13, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toder Alon, A.; Tahar, H. Employing face reading technology to study the effects of the fake news’ message sidedness on consumers’ emotional valence and arousal. Online Inf. Rev. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexander, R.; Aragón, O.R.; Bookwala, J.; Cherbuin, N.; Gatt, J.M.; Kahrilas, I.J.; Kästner, N.; Lawrence, A.; Lowe, L.; Morrison, R.G.; et al. The neuroscience of positive emotions and affect: Implications for cultivating happiness and wellbeing. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021, 121, 220–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mavros, P.; Wälti, M.J.; Nazemi, M.; Ong, C.H.; Hölscher, C. A mobile EEG study on the psychophysiological effects of walking and crowding in indoor and outdoor urban environments. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, S.L.; Cruickshank, T.; Nosaka, K. The Brief Emotional Experience Scale (BEES): Reliability and validity as a measure of positive and negative emotion. Psyarxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terry, P.C.; Skurvydas, A.; Lisinskiene, A.; Majauskiene, D.; Valanciene, D.; Cooper, S.; Lochbaum, M. Validation of a Lithuanian-language version of the Brunel Mood Scale: The BRUMS-LTU. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, Y.; Ritchie, J.B. Measuring destination attractiveness: A contextual approach. J. Travel Res. 1993, 32, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, M.; Liu, M.; Xu, J.; Li, S.; Cao, J. Understanding the influence of sensory advertising of tourism destinations on visit intention with a modified AIDA model. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2022, 27, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ancora, L.A.; Blanco-Mora, D.A.; Alves, I.; Bonifácio, A.; Morgado, P.; Miranda, B. Cities and neuroscience research: A systematic literature review. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 983352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pace-Schott, E.F.; Amole, M.C.; Aue, T.; Balconi, M.; Bylsma, L.M.; Critchley, H.; Demaree, H.A.; Friedman, B.H.; Gooding, A.E.K.; Gosseries, O.J.N.; et al. Physiological feelings. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019, 103, 267–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Jin, Y.; Zhao, R.; Han, Y.; Habert, G. Using the EEG+ VR+ LEC evaluation method to explore the combined influence of temperature and spatial openness on the physiological recovery of post-disaster populations. J. Affect. Disord. 2023, 243, 110637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez, A.; Rey, B.; Clemente, M.; Wrzesien, M.; Alcañiz, M. Assessing brain activations associated with emotional regulation during virtual reality mood induction procedures. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42, 1699–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, T.; Wang, L.; Luo, M.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X. ResNet-50 based technique for EEG image characterization due to varying environmental stimuli. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2022, 225, 107092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumgartner, H.; Homburg, C. Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1996, 13, 139–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, R.; Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Yi, D.; Chen, Y.; Cai, W.; Wang, X. The Park city perspective study: Revealing the park accessibility influenced by experiences of visitors under different travel modes. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 924996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nian, S.; Chen, M.; Zhang, X.; Li, D.; Ren, J. How Outstanding Universal Value Attractiveness and Tourism Crowding Affect Visitors’ Satisfaction? Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wei, Y.; Jin, L.; Xu, M.; Pan, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Instructions for planning emergency shelters and open spaces in China: Lessons from global experiences and expertise. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020, 51, 101813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feng, X.; Lei, J.; Xiu, C.; Li, J.; Bai, L.; Zhong, Y. Analysis of spatial scale effect on urban resilience: A case study of Shenyang, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2020, 30, 1005–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Pan, Y.; Fu, E.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Jiang, M.; Hassan, A.; Wu, D.; et al. Neuro-emotions based on electroencephalograph response to different color Ardisia mamillata Hance plants in elderly people with and without cognitive impairment. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 955393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafavi, A.; Cruz-Garza, J.G.; Kalantari, S. Enhancing lighting design through the investigation of illuminance and correlated color Temperature’s effects on brain activity: An EEG-VR approach. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 75, 106776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, X.; Gao, J.; Lu, J.; Li, P.; Zhang, Y. Social carrying capacity and emotion dynamics in urban national parks during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2023, 41, 100451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tokarchuk, O.; Gabriele, R.; Maurer, O. Estimating tourism social carrying capacity. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 86, 102971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coppola, A. The Differentiation of the Trivial. The Bars in NoLo (Milan) as Micro-Publics in the Age of Urban Super-Diversification. Lo Squaderno 2019, 41–44. Available online: www.losquaderno.net (accessed on 9 August 2023).
- Qi, M.; Gao, H. Acute psychological stress promotes general alertness and attentional control processes: An ERP study. Psychophysiology 2020, 57, e13521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tabaeeian, R.A.; Yazdi, A.; Mokhtari, N.; Khoshfetrat, A. Host-tourist interaction, revisit intention and memorable tourism experience through relationship quality and perceived service quality in ecotourism. J. Ecotourism 2023, 22, 406–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gedecho, E.K.; Kim, S.; Senbeto, D.L. Emotional and Hedonic Well-Being Experiences of Diaspora Festival Visitors: A Contemporary Migrants’ Perspective. J. Travel Res. 2023, 00472875231195738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freiberger, R.; Pracharn, D. Observation of Time on Alpha and Theta Brain Waves Implicated in Memory Recall Using Emotiv-14 EPOC X EEG Headgear. Symposium of Student Scholars. 2023. Available online: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/undergradsymposiumksu/spring2023/presentations/244/ (accessed on 9 August 2023).
- Osornio García, F.U.; Fragoso González, G.A.; Martínez Pérez, M.V.; Báez Martínez, F.; Salas Barraza, M.H.; González, V.M. Emotional Analysis through EEG on In-Store Journey: Pilot Methodology for Evocation of Emotions Through Video Stimuli to Measure Performance Metrics Using EEG Emotiv EPOC+ on In-Store Experiences. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Copenhagen, Denmark, 23–28 July 2023; pp. 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.-H.; Guo, J.; Wang, Y. Tourists’ negative emotions: Antecedents and consequences. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 25, 1987–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; He, E.; Jia, X.; Chen, W.; Skakun, S.; Bao, H.; Jiang, Z.; Ghosh, R.; Ravirathinam, P. Fairness by “Where”: A Statistically-Robust and Model-Agnostic Bi-level Learning Framework. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Online, 22 February–1 March 2022; pp. 12208–12216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Yang, X.; Fu, S.; Huan, T.-C. Exploring the influence of tourists’ happiness on revisit intention in the context of Traditional Chinese Medicine cultural tourism. Tour. Manag. 2023, 94, 104647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Ji, Y.; Ni, Y. Love me, love my dog: Does destination attractiveness not only mitigate tourists’ anger and regret emotions but also prevent negative word of mouth? Curr. Issues Tour. 2023, 26, 2166–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, S.; Jiang, L.; Woosnam, K.M.; Eck, T. Volunteer tourists’ revisit intentions explained through emotional solidarity and on-site experience. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2022, 53, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Song, H. Does the perception of smart governance enhance commercial investments? Evidence from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Hangzhou. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, X.; Li, J.; Ma, Q. Integrating green infrastructure, ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: A comprehensive literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 98, 104843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samus, A.; Freeman, C.; Van Heezik, Y.; Krumme, K.; Dickinson, K.J. How do urban green spaces increase well-being? The role of perceived wildness and nature connectedness. J. Environ. Psychol. 2022, 82, 101850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, L.; Chang, J. Residents’ Sense of Place on Micro Small Public Spaces on Epidemic Perspective. SHS Web Conf. 2023, 163, 04023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, S.-G.; Gim, T.-H.T. Considerations for encouraging citizen participation by information-disadvantaged groups in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 76, 103437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaman, U.; Aktan, M.; Agrusa, J.; Khwaja, M.G. Linking regenerative travel and residents’ support for tourism development in Kaua’i Island (Hawaii): Moderating-mediating effects of travel-shaming and foreign tourist attractiveness. J. Travel Res. 2023, 62, 782–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaglione, F.; Gargiulo, C.; Zucaro, F.; Cottrill, C. Urban accessibility in a 15-minute city: A measure in the city of Naples, Italy. Transp. Res. Procedia 2022, 60, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, V.D.; Carthen, C.D.; Kamaruddin, N.; Tavakkoli, A.; Dascalu, S.M.; Harris, F.C., Jr. Generalized EEG Data Acquisition and Processing System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 24–26 April 2023; pp. 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.-Y.; Stevenson, C.E.; Jung, T.-P.; Ko, L.-W. Stress-induced effects in resting EEG spectra predict the performance of SSVEP-based BCI. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2020, 28, 1771–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mavroudi, S.; Parthenios, P. A Methodological Approach for Creating Urban Commons of Wellness in Public Open Spaces in the City of Chania. In Smart Cities and Machine Learning in Urban Health; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 47–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noe, E.E.; Stolte, O. Dwelling in the city: A qualitative exploration of the human-nature relationship in three types of urban greenspace. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2023, 230, 104633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Cheng, Y.; Ni, Y. Staging a comeback? The influencing mechanism of tourist crowding perception on adaptive behavior. Tour. Manag. 2024, 100, 104827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammad, A. Developing a Parametric Design Tool as a Decision Support System for Designing Pocket Parks. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Kansas City, MO, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Type | Description | Number |
---|---|---|
Street Green Space | Street green space are located next to the street for pedestrians or nearby residents to rest for a short time. Smaller ones can be decorative green areas for pedestrians to enjoy; larger ones can be a form of small garden. | 2 |
Pocket Park | Pocket parks are small-scale, diverse shapes, open to the public, with certain recreational functions and greening activities; generally between 400 and 10,000 square meters, including small gardens, small micro green space, etc. | 3 |
Community Garden | Community gardens are autonomous “mini-gardens” designed, created, maintained, and managed by community residents and public interest organisations using fragmented urban space, providing a public space for community residents to participate in building and interacting with each other. | 1 |
Frequency | Percentage (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Premises near the place of residence | Street-level green space | 375 | 66.14 |
Pocket park | 230 | 40.56 | |
Community garden | 303 | 53.44 | |
The main purpose of your visit to a small urban public space (street-level green space/pocket park/community garden) | Stress relief and relaxation | 435 | 76.72 |
Parent–child interaction, intergenerational interaction | 118 | 20.81 | |
Photography | 66 | 11.64 | |
Learn about plants and gain insight | 30 | 5.29 | |
Physical activity/exercise | 234 | 41.27 | |
Enhancing neighbourhood (social) communication | 25 | 4.41 |
Name | Options | Frequency | Percentage (%) | Cumulative Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Under 18 years old | 1 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
18–25 years | 33 | 5.82 | 6 | |
26–35 years old | 87 | 15.34 | 21.34 | |
36–45 years | 124 | 21.87 | 43.21 | |
46–65 years | 315 | 55.56 | 98.77 | |
65+ years | 7 | 1.23 | 100 | |
Gender | Male | 264 | 46.56 | 46.56 |
Female | 303 | 53.44 | 100 | |
Education level | Lower secondary and below | 82 | 14.46 | 14.46 |
High school or secondary school | 107 | 18.87 | 33.33 | |
Tertiary or undergraduate | 331 | 58.38 | 91.71 | |
Master and above | 47 | 8.29 | 100 | |
Occupation | Civil Servants/Military/Police | 22 | 3.88 | 3.88 |
Professional and technical staff (e.g., teachers, doctors) | 215 | 37.92 | 41.8 | |
Service industry, sales, business | 84 | 14.81 | 56.61 | |
Workers/Farmers (including migrant workers) | 64 | 11.29 | 67.9 | |
Students | 31 | 5.47 | 73.37 | |
Retired/Freelance/Unemployed | 55 | 9.7 | 83.07 | |
Other | 96 | 16.93 | 100 | |
Monthly income | 1000 and below | 44 | 7.76 | 7.76 |
1001–3000 | 79 | 13.93 | 21.69 | |
3001–5000 | 187 | 32.98 | 54.67 | |
5001–8000 | 189 | 33.33 | 88.01 | |
8000–10,000 | 68 | 11.99 | 100 |
Estimate | S.E. | Est./S.E. | Two-Tailed p-Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crowding Perception | → | Positive emotions | −0.212 | 0.05 | −4.202 | 0.000 |
Crowding Perception | → | Negative emotions | 0.221 | 0.046 | 4.841 | 0.000 |
Crowding Perception | → | Intention to revisit | −0.218 | 0.054 | −4.064 | 0.000 |
Positive emotions | → | Intention to revisit | 0.392 | 0.061 | 6.392 | 0.000 |
Negative emotions | → | Intention to revisit | −0.443 | 0.059 | −7.552 | 0.000 |
Positive Emotions | Re-Defence Intent | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t-Value | p-Value | β | SE | t-Value | p-Value | |
Constant | 4.189 | 0.131 | 31.957 | 0.000 ** | 4.553 | 0.692 | 6.581 | 0.000 ** |
Crowding Perception | −0.223 | 0.04 | −5.626 | 0.000 ** | −0.145 | 0.047 | −3.082 | 0.002 ** |
Environmental appeal | −0.634 | 0.218 | −2.915 | 0.004 ** | ||||
Positive emotions | −0.485 | 0.211 | −2.297 | 0.022 * | ||||
Positive emotions * Environmental appeal | 0.27 | 0.062 | 4.356 | 0.000 ** | ||||
Sample size | 567 | 567 | ||||||
R2 | 0.053 | 0.324 | ||||||
Adjustment R2 | 0.05 | 0.318 | ||||||
F Value | F (1,565) = 31.655, p = 0.000 | F (4,562) = 67.272, p = 0.000 | ||||||
Results of conditional indirect effects | ||||||||
Intermediate variables | Level | Horizontal values | Effect | SE | BootLLCI | BootULCI | ||
Positive emotions | Low level (−1 SD) | 2.42 | −0.038 | 0.028 | −0.099 | 0.008 | ||
Average | 3.215 | −0.086 | 0.02 | −0.129 | −0.05 | |||
High level (+1 SD) | 4.01 | −0.134 | 0.022 | −0.178 | −0.09 |
Negative Emotions | Re-Defence Intent | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t-Value | p-Value | β | SE | t-Value | p-Value | |
Constant | 2.245 | 0.131 | 17.199 | 0.000 ** | 8.311 | 0.494 | 16.828 | 0.000 ** |
Crowding Perception | 0.197 | 0.04 | 4.991 | 0.000 ** | −0.182 | 0.04 | −4.525 | 0.000 ** |
Environmental appeal | −0.993 | 0.155 | −6.424 | 0.000 ** | ||||
Negative emotions | −1.688 | 0.153 | −11.02 | 0.000 ** | ||||
Negative emotions * Environmental appeal | 0.406 | 0.048 | 8.483 | 0.000 ** | ||||
Sample size | 567 | 567 | ||||||
R2 | 0.042 | 0.388 | ||||||
Adjustment R2 | 0.039 | 0.382 | ||||||
F Value | F (1,565) = 24.914, p = 0.000 | F (4,562) = 89.025, p = 0.000 | ||||||
Results of conditional indirect effects | ||||||||
Intermediate variables | Level | Horizontal values | Effect | BootSE | BootLLCI | BootULCI | ||
Negative emotions | Low level (−1 SD) | 2.42 | −0.139 | 0.031 | −0.203 | −0.08 | ||
Average | 3.215 | −0.075 | 0.019 | −0.115 | −0.042 | |||
High level (+1 SD) | 4.01 | −0.012 | 0.013 | −0.039 | 0.013 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, J.; Qi, R.; Zhang, H. Examining the Impact of Crowding Perception on the Generation of Negative Emotions among Users of Small Urban Micro Public Spaces. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216104
Zhang J, Qi R, Zhang H. Examining the Impact of Crowding Perception on the Generation of Negative Emotions among Users of Small Urban Micro Public Spaces. Sustainability. 2023; 15(22):16104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216104
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Jun, Ruoming Qi, and Huina Zhang. 2023. "Examining the Impact of Crowding Perception on the Generation of Negative Emotions among Users of Small Urban Micro Public Spaces" Sustainability 15, no. 22: 16104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216104
APA StyleZhang, J., Qi, R., & Zhang, H. (2023). Examining the Impact of Crowding Perception on the Generation of Negative Emotions among Users of Small Urban Micro Public Spaces. Sustainability, 15(22), 16104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216104