Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. From BIM to Digital Twins in the Construction Industry
1.2. Components of Digital Twins
1.3. Widespread Adoption of Digital Twins in the Construction Industry
1.4. Ethical and Social Implications of Using Digital Twins in the Construction Industry
1.5. Examples of Digital Twin Application for On-Site Construction
1.6. Research Significance
1.7. Research Questions and Objectives
- (RQ1) What are the key components and elements responsible for developing and evolving the digital twin concepts and applications in the AEC industry?
- (RQ2) What are the existing research gaps and future avenues for research on digital twins in the construction sector?
- (RO1) To systematically analyze the status of research on digital twin developments.
- (RO2) To clarify the concepts and enhance understanding of key components and elements of digital twins in construction.
- (RO3) To structure the key constituents that help develop digital twins and their applications in the AEC sector.
- (RO4) To identify crucial gaps in the existing literature and recommend potential avenues for future research efforts.
2. Materials and Methods for Literature Review
2.1. Classification and Scope Criteria
2.2. Literature Retrieval and Review Process
3. Data Extraction and Current State-of-the-Art Analysis
- Technologies comprise the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and extended reality (XR).
- Maturity levels comprise the pre-DT, DT, adaptive, and intelligent DT.
- Data layers comprise data acquisition, transmission, modeling, integration and fusion layer, and service layer.
- Enablers comprise service, data, physical and virtual entities, and connection.
- Functionalities comprise simulation, visualization, prediction, optimization, and monitoring.
4. Findings and Discussions
4.1. Technologies
4.1.1. Internet of Things (IoT)
4.1.2. Artificial Intelligence (AI)
4.1.3. Cloud Computing (CC)
4.1.4. Extended Reality (XR)
4.2. Maturity Levels
4.2.1. Pre-Digital Twin
4.2.2. Digital Twin (DT)
4.2.3. Adaptive Digital Twin
4.2.4. Intelligent Digital Twin
4.3. Data Layers
4.3.1. Data Acquisition Layer
4.3.2. Data Transmission Layer
4.3.3. Digital Modeling Layer
4.3.4. Data and Model Integration, and Fusion Layer
4.3.5. Service Decision-Making Layer
4.4. Enablers
4.4.1. Physical Entity
4.4.2. Virtual Model
4.4.3. Data
4.4.4. Smart Service
4.4.5. Connection
4.5. Functionalities
4.5.1. Simulation
4.5.2. Visualization
4.5.3. Prediction
4.5.4. Optimization
4.5.5. Monitoring
5. Summary and Future Recommendations
- Semantic data modeling for better integration and interoperability: The integration and fusion of diverse data sets, including BIM models, sensor data, and other systems, present challenges in data integration and interoperability. Future research should focus on semantic data modeling to enable standardized digital twin data, facilitating a seamless and bi-directional integration of heterogeneous data sets. The rich data models preserving high-quality data integrity for different applications, data sets, assets, and processes should be developed rigorously.
- Advanced technologies for big data storing and processing: Digital twins of the digitalization era have led to an increase in dynamic and real-time data, posing challenges in storing, processing, and managing big data. Future research should explore better technologies for storing and handling smart big data while addressing issues related to raw data. The new improvements in data accuracy, intelligence levels, and decision making in construction projects and assets management functions should be developed comprehensively.
- XR environments for DT applications: XR technologies (VR, AR, and MR) offer opportunities for visualizing and interacting with digital twin data in immersive environments for specific applications in the construction industry. Future developments should focus on enhancing the visualization of temporal, multi-temporal, and spatio-temporal data in a 3D virtual model and finding innovative ways to visualize abstract parameters collected with IoT sensors.
- Real-time monitoring, prediction, and feedback control: Further research is needed to achieve ideal digital twins that incorporate high-precision real-time monitoring and prediction capabilities within the built environment, especially in the sustainability and net-zero paradigms. Future studies should focus on enabling automated two-way feedback control for adjusting building parameters when necessary. An intelligent exploration of the integration of technologies such as AI, AR, and advanced analytics to enhance the capabilities of digital twins is also needed.
- Cloud computing and IoT-based services for city-level digital twins: As digital twins evolve, future research might need to explore practical applications at the city level, integrating different assets such as smart buildings and utilities, people and transportation infrastructure. Future research efforts need to develop comprehensive and interconnected city digital twins by leveraging cloud computing and IoT-based services enhancement.
- Security and privacy considerations: Data transmission in digital twins involves sensitive and confidential information, making it prone to possible cyber attacks and security threats. In future research efforts, addressing security requirements and developing secure transmission protocols for digital twins’ network and communication layers is crucial for DT applications in the construction sector. Additionally, privacy-preserving networks and privacy policies should be investigated to protect data privacy.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Attaran, M.; Celik, B.G. Digital twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities. Decis. Anal. J. 2023, 6, 100165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, A.; Thiel, R.; Jain, P.; Singh, V.; Fischer, M. Digital twin: Where do humans fit in? Autom. Constr. 2023, 148, 104749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botín-Sanabria, D.M.; Mihaita, A.-S.; Peimbert-García, R.E.; Ramírez-Moreno, M.A.; Ramírez-Mendoza, R.A.; Lozoya-Santos, J.d.J. Digital twin technology challenges and applications: A comprehensive review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Olvera, C. Towards the development of a digital twin for a sustainable mass customization 4.0 environment: A literature review of relevant concepts. Automation 2022, 3, 197–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Q.; Tao, F.; Hu, T.; Anwer, N.; Liu, A.; Wei, Y.; Wang, L.; Nee, A.Y.C. Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afzal, M. Evaluation and Development of Automated Detailing Design Optimization Framework for RC Slabs Using BIM and Metaheuristics; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology: Hong Kong, China, 2019; p. 137. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Afzal, M.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Gan, J. Concrete reinforcement modelling with IFC for automated rebar fabrication. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management (ICCEPM 2020), Hong Kong, China, 7–8 December 2020; Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/110084 (accessed on 4 October 2023).
- Sacks, R.; Eastman, C.; Lee, G.; Teicholz, P. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Zhuang, D.; Zhang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, C.; Jin, X.; Zhou, X.; Shi, X. A performance data integrated BIM framework for building life-cycle energy efficiency and environmental optimization design. Autom. Constr. 2021, 127, 103712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.; Peavy, M. BIM-based semantic building world modeling for robot task planning and execution in built environments. Autom. Constr. 2022, 138, 104247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doumbouya, L.; Gao, G.; Guan, C. Adoption of the building information modeling (bim) for construction project effectiveness: The review of bim benefits. Am. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 2016, 4, 74–79. [Google Scholar]
- Durdyev, S.; Ashour, M.; Connelly, S.; Mahdiyar, A. Barriers to the implementation of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for facility management. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 46, 103736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leygonie, R.; Motamedi, A.; Iordanova, I. Development of quality improvement procedures and tools for facility management BIM. Dev. Built Environ. 2022, 11, 100075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batty, M. Digital twins. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2018, 45, 817–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradley, A.; Li, H.; Lark, R.; Dunn, S. BIM for infrastructure: An overall review and constructor perspective. Autom. Constr. 2016, 71, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khudhair, A.; Li, H.; Ren, G.; Liu, S. Towards Future BIM Technology Innovations: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Cheng, J.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, H.; Sui, F. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 94, 3563–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacks, R.; Brilakis, I.; Pikas, E.; Xie, H.S.; Girolami, M. Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-Centric Eng. 2020, 1, e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Saeed, Y.; Edwards, D.J.; Scaysbrook, S. Automating construction manufacturing procedures using BIM digital objects (BDOs). Constr. Innov. 2020, 20, 345–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Peng, S.; Phil-Ebosie, O. Digital twin aided sustainability and vulnerability audit for subway stations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coupry, C.; Noblecourt, S.; Richard, P.; Baudry, D.; Bigaud, D. BIM-based digital twin and xr devices to improve maintenance procedures in smart buildings: A literature review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honghong, S.; Gang, Y.; Haijiang, L.; Tian, Z.; Annan, J. Digital twin enhanced BIM to shape full life cycle digital transformation for bridge engineering. Autom. Constr. 2023, 147, 104736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, R.; Brilakis, I. Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters. Autom. Constr. 2019, 105, 102837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Liu, Z. Research on intelligent dispatching system management platform for construction projects based on digital twin and bim technology. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2022, 2022, 8273451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attaran, M.; Attaran, S.; Celik, B.G. The impact of digital twins on the evolution of intelligent manufacturing and Industry 4.0. Adv. Comput. Intell. 2023, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Julien, N.; Martin, E. How to characterize a Digital Twin: A Usage-Driven Classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2021, 54, 894–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryant, R. The digital future of the construction industry. Constr. Eng. Aust. 2021, 7, 46–47. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W.; Guo, H.; Li, X.; Tang, S.; Li, Y.; Xie, L.; Lv, Z. BIM information integration based vr modeling in digital twins in industry 5.0. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 28, 100351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davtalab, O. Benefits of Real-Time Data Driven BIM for FM Departments in Operations Control and Maintenance; ASCE: Reston, VA, USA, 2017; Volume 2017, pp. 202–210. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, J.; Feng, H.; Chen, Q.; Garcia de Soto, B. Developing a conceptual framework for the application of digital twin technologies to revamp building operation and maintenance processes. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 49, 104028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.; Chen, P.; Shou, W.; Sadick, A.-M. Digital Twin-driven approach to improving energy efficiency of indoor lighting based on computer vision and dynamic BIM. Energy Build. 2022, 270, 112271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grégorio, J.-L.; Lartigue, C.; Thiébaut, F.; Lebrun, R. A digital twin-based approach for the management of geometrical deviations during assembly processes. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alizadehsalehi, S.; Yitmen, I. Digital twin-based progress monitoring management model through reality capture to extended reality technologies (DRX). Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2023, 12, 200–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davila Delgado, J.M.; Oyedele, L. Digital Twins for the built environment: Learning from conceptual and process models in manufacturing. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2021, 49, 101332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Fang, S.; Dong, H.; Xu, C. Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 346–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Lian, Q. Digital twin aided sustainability-based lifecycle management for railway turnout systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 1537–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ali, A.R.; Gupta, R.; Zaman Batool, T.; Landolsi, T.; Aloul, F.; Al Nabulsi, A. Digital twin conceptual model within the context of internet of things. Future Internet 2020, 12, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omrany, H.; Al-Obaidi, K.M.; Husain, A.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A. Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Current Implementations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.Y.M.; Chau, K.W.; Ho, D.C.-W. Current State of Art in Artificial Intelligence and Ubiquitous Cities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Daniotti, B.; Masera, G.; Bolognesi, C.M.; Lupica Spagnolo, S.; Pavan, A.; Iannaccone, G.; Signorini, M.; Ciuffreda, S.; Mirarchi, C.; Lucky, M.; et al. The development of a bim-based interoperable toolkit for efficient renovation in buildings: From bim to digital twin. Buildings 2022, 12, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamari, M.; Ham, Y. AI-based risk assessment for construction site disaster preparedness through deep learning-based digital twinning. Autom. Constr. 2022, 134, 104091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozturk, G.B. Digital Twin Research in the AECO-FM Industry. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, M.; Menassa, C.C.; Kamat, V.R. From BIM to digital twins: A systematic review of the evolution of intelligent building representations in the AEC-FM industry. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2021, 26, 58–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuhaise, V.V.; Tah, J.H.M.; Abanda, F.H. Technologies for digital twin applications in construction. Autom. Constr. 2023, 152, 104931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Li, R.Y.M.; Yao, Q.; Song, L.; Deeprasert, J. Housing safety and health academic and public opinion mining from 1945 to 2021: PRISMA, cluster analysis, and natural language processing approaches. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 902576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Afzal, M.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Gan, V.J.L. Reinforced concrete structural design optimization: A critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 120623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kugley, S.; Wade, A.; Thomas, J.; Mahood, Q.; Anne-Marie Klint, J.; Hammerstrøm, K.; Sathe, N. Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Syst. Rev. 2017, 13, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, A.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Li, R.Y.; Corchado, J.M.; Cheong, P.H.; Mossberger, K.; Mehmood, R. Understanding Local Government Digital Technology Adoption Strategies: A PRISMA Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mou, X.; Li, R.Y.M. The Impact of ArtificialIntelligence Educational Robots in the Field of Education: A Prismareview. In Current State of Art in Artificial Intelligence and Ubiquitous Cities; Li, R.Y.M., Chau, K.W., Ho, D.C.W., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 63–77. [Google Scholar]
- Gusenbauer, M.; Haddaway, N.R. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res. Synth. Methods 2020, 11, 181–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shu, Z.; Wan, J.; Zhang, D.; Li, D. Cloud-integrated cyber-physical systems for complex industrial applications. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2016, 21, 865–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baucas, M.J.; Spachos, P.; Gregori, S. Internet-of-things devices and assistive technologies for health care: APPLICATIONS, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2021, 38, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuller, A.; Fan, Z.; Day, C.; Barlow, C. Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 108952–108971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, R.; Li, M.; Hu, Z.; Han, Z.; Zheng, R. Digital twin in smart manufacturing: Remote control and virtual machining using VR and AR technologies. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2022, 65, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, L.; Wu, S.; Zhang, G.; Tan, Y.; Wang, X. Literature review of digital twins applications in construction workforce safety. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Xie, S. Artificial intelligence in the digital twins: State of the art, challenges, and future research topics [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Digit. Twin 2022, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandolla, C.; Petruzzelli, A.M.; Percoco, G.; Urbinati, A. Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry. Comput. Ind. 2019, 109, 134–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, M.; Shafiq, M.T.; Douglas, D.; Kassem, M. Digital twins in built environments: An investigation of the characteristics, applications, and challenges. Buildings 2022, 12, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirowzhan, S.; Tan, W.; Sepasgozar, S.M.E. Digital twin and cybergis for improving connectivity and measuring the impact of infrastructure construction planning in smart cities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, G.; Zink, A.; Codecá, L.; Clarke, S. A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback. Cities 2021, 110, 103064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Shang, J.; Xue, F. RegARD: Symmetry-based coarse registration of smartphone’s colorful point clouds with cad drawings for low-cost digital twin buildings. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H. Digital-twin-based evaluation of nearly zero-energy building for existing buildings based on scan-to-bim. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 2021, 6638897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, J.; Guo, D.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. The modelling and operations for the digital twin in the context of manufacturing. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2019, 13, 534–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kritzinger, W.; Karner, M.; Traar, G.; Henjes, J.; Sihn, W. Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madni, A.M.; Madni, C.C.; Lucero, S.D. Leveraging digital twin technology in model-based systems engineering. Systems 2019, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osadcha, I.; Jurelionis, A.; Fokaides, P. Geometric parameter updating in digital twin of built assets: A systematic literature review. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 73, 106704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharif Ullah, A.M.M. Modeling and simulation of complex manufacturing phenomena using sensor signals from the perspective of Industry 4.0. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2019, 39, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Liu, W.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Liu, Q.; Qu, T.; Hu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, F.; Xu, W.; et al. Digital twin and its potential application exploration. Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. CIMS 2018, 24, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Wilde, P. Building performance simulation in the brave new world of artificial intelligence and digital twins: A systematic review. Energy Build. 2023, 292, 113171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannele, K.; Reijo, M.; Tarja, M.; Sami, P.; Jenni, K.; Teija, R. Expanding uses of building information modeling in life-cycle construction projects. Work 2012, 41, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, M.; Guo, D.; Wu, W.; Zhong, R.Y.; Huang, G.Q. Digital twin-enabled smart modular integrated construction system for on-site assembly. Comput. Ind. 2022, 136, 103594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, M.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; Zhong, R.Y.; Pan, W.; Huang, G.Q. Digital twin-enabled real-time synchronization for planning, scheduling, and execution in precast on-site assembly. Autom. Constr. 2022, 141, 104397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, C.; Park, T.; Lim, H.; Kim, H. On-site construction management using mobile computing technology. Autom. Constr. 2013, 35, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Zhang, L. A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management. Autom. Constr. 2021, 124, 103564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, C. Calculation of a building’s life cycle carbon emissions based on Ecotect and building information modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahinmoghadam, M.; Natephra, W.; Motamedi, A. BIM- and IoT-based virtual reality tool for real-time thermal comfort assessment in building enclosures. Build. Environ. 2021, 199, 107905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spudys, P.; Afxentiou, N.; Georgali, P.-Z.; Klumbyte, E.; Jurelionis, A.; Fokaides, P. Classifying the operational energy performance of buildings with the use of digital twins. Energy Build. 2023, 290, 113106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tagliabue, L.C.; Re Cecconi, F.; Rinaldi, S.; Ciribini, A.L.C. Data driven indoor air quality prediction in educational facilities based on IoT network. Energy Build. 2021, 236, 110782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Zhao, N.; Sun, L.; Zhang, S. Modular based flexible digital twin for factory design. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2019, 10, 1189–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legner, C.; Eymann, T.; Hess, T.; Matt, C.; Böhmann, T.; Drews, P.; Mädche, A.; Urbach, N.; Ahlemann, F. Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2017, 59, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schroeder, G.N.; Steinmetz, C.; Pereira, C.E.; Espindola, D.B. Digital Twin Data Modeling with AutomationML and a Communication Methodology for Data Exchange. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016, 49, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Sui, F.; Liu, A.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Song, B.; Guo, Z.; Lu, S.C.Y.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 3935–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Zhang, M. Digital twin shop-floor: A new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 20418–20427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glaessgen, E.; Stargel, D. The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–26 April 2012; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, F.; Ma, L.; Broyd, T.; Chen, K. Digital twin and its implementations in the civil engineering sector. Autom. Constr. 2021, 130, 103838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scharl, S.; Praktiknjo, A. The role of a digital industry 4.0 in a renewable energy system. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 3891–3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafto, M.; Conroy, M.; Doyle, R.; Glaessgen, E.; Kemp, C.; LeMoigne, J.; Wang, L. Modeling, simulation, information technology & processing roadmap. Natl. Aeronaut. Space Adm. 2012, 32, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Liu, W.; Zhang, M.; Hu, T.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, H.; Sui, F.; Wang, T.; Xu, H.; Huang, Z.; et al. Five-dimension digital twin model and its ten applications. Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. CIMS 2019, 25, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieves, M.W. Product lifecycle management: The new paradigm for enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 2005, 2, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieves, M. Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication. White Pap. 2015, 1, 1–7. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275211047_Digital_Twin_Manufacturing_Excellence_through_Virtual_Factory_Replication (accessed on 4 October 2023).
- Qi, Q.; Tao, F. Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 3585–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stark, R.; Kind, S.; Neumeyer, S. Innovations in digital modelling for next generation manufacturing system design. CIRP Ann. 2017, 66, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosen, R.; von Wichert, G.; Lo, G.; Bettenhausen, K.D. About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015, 48, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, C.; Liu, J.; Xiong, H. Digital twin-based smart production management and control framework for the complex product assembly shop-floor. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 96, 1149–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- NASA. DRAFT Modeling, Simulation, Information Technology & Processing Roadmap—Technology Area 11; National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
- Hochhalter, J.D.; Leser, W.P.; Newman, J.A.; Glaessgen, E.H.; Gupta, V.K.; Yamakov, V.I. Coupling Damage-Sensing Particles to the Digitial Twin Concept. 2014. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140006408/downloads/20140006408.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2023).
- Boschert, S.; Rosen, R. Digital twin—The simulation aspect. In Mechatronic Futures: Challenges and Solutions for Mechatronic Systems and Their Designers; Hehenberger, P., Bradley, D., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 59–74. [Google Scholar]
- Schluse, M.; Rossmann, J. From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), Orlando, FL, USA, 18–21 April 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weyer, S.; Meyer, T.; Ohmer, M.; Gorecky, D.; Zühlke, D. Future modeling and simulation of cps-based factories: An example from the automotive industry. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016, 49, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negri, E.; Fumagalli, L.; Macchi, M. A Review of the roles of digital twin in cps-based production systems. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieves, M.; Vickers, J. Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems: New Findings and Approaches; Kahlen, F.-J., Flumerfelt, S., Alves, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 85–113. [Google Scholar]
- Demkovich, N.; Yablochnikov, E.; Abaev, G. Multiscale modeling and simulation for industrial cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 15–18 May 2018; pp. 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Liu, B.; Wang, G.; Zhang, C. A comparative study on digital twin models. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing: College Park, MD, USA, 2019; Volume 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Autiosalo, J.; Vepsäläinen, J.; Viitala, R.; Tammi, K. A feature-based framework for structuring industrial digital twins. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 1193–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, T.; Hu, T.; Zhou, T.; Ye, Y. Data Construction method for the applications of workshop digital twin system. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Sehrawy, R.; Kumar, B. Digital twins in architecture, engineering, construction and operations. A brief review and analysis. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, São Paulo, Brazil, 18–20 August 2020; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 924–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ECSO. Digitalisation in the Construction Sector: Analytical Report; European Construction Sector Observatory: Brussels, Belgium, 2021; Available online: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-11/ECSO_CFS%20Poland_2021.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2023).
- Afzal, M.; Sousa, H.S.; Valente, I.; Roux, S. BIM 7D–Research on Applications for Operations & Maintenance. Master’s Thesis, University of Minho (UMinho), Braga, Portugal, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamat, V. Real-Time Process-Level Digital Twin for Collaborative Human-Robot Construction Work. In Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Kitakyushu, Japan, 27–28 October 2020; International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC): Edinburg, UK, 2020; pp. 1528–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yitmen, I.; Alizadehsalehi, S.; Akıner, İ.; Akıner, M.E. An Adapted Model of Cognitive Digital Twins for Building Lifecycle Management. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Q.; Parlikad Ajith, K.; Woodall, P.; Don Ranasinghe, G.; Xie, X.; Liang, Z.; Konstantinou, E.; Heaton, J.; Schooling, J. Developing a digital twin at building and city levels: Case study of west cambridge campus. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 05020004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, J.C.P.; Chen, W.; Chen, K.; Wang, Q. Data-driven predictive maintenance planning framework for MEP components based on BIM and IoT using machine learning algorithms. Autom. Constr. 2020, 112, 103087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pregnolato, M.; Gunner, S.; Voyagaki, E.; De Risi, R.; Carhart, N.; Gavriel, G.; Tully, P.; Tryfonas, T.; Macdonald, J.; Taylor, C. Towards Civil Engineering 4.0: Concept, workflow and application of Digital Twins for existing infrastructure. Autom. Constr. 2022, 141, 104421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosamo, H.H.; Svennevig, P.R.; Svidt, K.; Han, D.; Nielsen, H.K. A Digital twin predictive maintenance framework of air handling units based on automatic fault detection and diagnostics. Energy Build. 2022, 261, 111988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.; Lee, S.H.; Masoud, N.; Krishnan, M.S.; Li, V.C. Integrated digital twin and blockchain framework to support accountable information sharing in construction projects. Autom. Constr. 2021, 127, 103688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Shi, G.; Jiao, Z.; Zhao, L. Intelligent safety assessment of prestressed steel structures based on digital twins. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.; Lee, S. Digital twin for supply chain coordination in modular construction. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Lu, Q.; Parlikad, A.K.; Schooling, J.M. Digital twin enabled asset anomaly detection for building facility management. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2020, 53, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Q.; Xie, X.; Parlikad, A.K.; Schooling, J.M. Digital twin-enabled anomaly detection for built asset monitoring in operation and maintenance. Autom. Constr. 2020, 118, 103277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yu, F.; Xu, J.; Gao, S. Digital twin hospital buildings: An exemplary case study through continuous lifecycle integration. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8846667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Ding, L.; Zhou, C. Cyber physical system for safety management in smart construction site. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2021, 28, 788–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Qi, Q.; Wang, L.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison. Engineering 2019, 5, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamat, V. Bi-Directional communication bridge for state synchronization between digital twin simulations and physical construction robots. In Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Kitakyushu, Japan, 27–28 October 2020; International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC): Edinburg, UK, 2020; pp. 1480–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teisserenc, B.; Sepasgozar, S. Project data categorization, adoption factors, and non-functional requirements for blockchain based digital twins in the construction industry 4.0. Buildings 2021, 11, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.-S.; Meng, X.-T.; Xing, Z.-Z.; Cao, C.-F.; Jiao, Y.-Y.; Li, A.-X. Digital twin-based intelligent safety risks prediction of prefabricated construction hoisting. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, D.; Xia, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Duan, J. Overview of predictive maintenance based on digital twin technology. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, K.; Shi, H.; Hui, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, F.; Cao, W. Smart steel bridge construction enabled by BIM and Internet of Things in industry 4.0: A framework. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Zhuhai, China, 27–29 March 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, X.; Anumba, C.J. Cyber-physical systems for temporary structures monitoring. In Cyber-Physical Systems in the Built Environment; Anumba, C.J., Roofigari-Esfahan, N., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 107–138. [Google Scholar]
- Uddin, S.M.; Albert, A.; Ovid, A.; Alsharef, A. Leveraging chatgpt to aid construction hazard recognition and support safety education and training. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuteja, N.; Nath, S. Reinventing the Data Experience: Use Generative AI and Modern Data Architecture to Unlock Insights. Online: AWS Machine Learning Blog. 27 October 2023. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/reinventing-the-data-experience-use-generative-ai-and-modern-data-architecture-to-unlock-insights/ (accessed on 4 October 2023).
- Siriwardhana, S.; Weerasekera, R.; Wen, E.; Kaluarachchi, T.; Rana, R.; Nanayakkara, S. Improving the domain adaptation of retrieval augmented generation (rag) models for open domain question answering. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 2023, 11, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Source Databases | Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Taylor and Francis, IEEE Xplore, Springer, and ASCE Library |
---|---|
Search String | (“digital twin” OR “digital twins” OR “virtual twin” OR “digital replica” OR “virtual counterpart” OR “cyber-physical system”) AND (“development” OR “evolution” OR “key technologies” OR “key components” OR “key elements” OR “applications”) AND (“construction engineering” OR “construction” OR “construction sector” OR “AEC industry” OR “construction industry” OR “construction engineering and management”) |
Time Period Restriction | 2010–2023 |
Article Types | Journal, Review, Conference Paper, Book Chapter |
Language Restriction | English |
Included Subject Areas | Engineering, Computer Science, Mathematics, Energy, Environmental Science, Decision Sciences Materials Science, Business, Management, and Accounting |
Excluded Subject Areas | Social Sciences, Chemical Engineering, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Medicine, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Arts and Humanities, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Chemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology |
Work Area/Industry | Construction Industry, AEC Sector, Civil Engineering |
No | Key Components | Description | Corresponding Literature |
---|---|---|---|
I | Technologies | The core technologies that help develop the interaction of the DT with real-world physical entities are the Internet of Things (IoTs), artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing (CC), extended reality (XR) | [1,21,25,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63] |
II | Maturity Levels | The basic levels of DT maturity have specific purposes and scope to help in decision making throughout the system’s lifecycle: the pre-DT, DT, adaptive and intelligent DT | [2,22,26,34,35,64,65,66,67,68,69] |
III | Data Layers | Data are the core of DT virtual model integration and fusion, and data flow in layers between systems: data acquisition, transmission, modeling, data/model integration and fusion, and service layers | [36,63,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79] |
IV | Enablers | Five fundamental entities are responsible for promoting and enabling the functioning of the DT: physical entity, virtual model, data, intelligent service, connection | [5,22,52,65,80,81,82,83,84] |
V | Functionalities | A variety of functionalities are carried out with DT employment; however, the crucial ones for the AEC sector applications over a product’s lifecycle are simulation, visualization, prediction, optimization, monitoring | [5,17,20,23,33,36,42,72,73,75,78,83,85,86] |
Corresponding Study | Year | Key Point in the Study | DT-Definitions |
---|---|---|---|
[96] | 2010 | Integrated simulation | The DT is a comprehensive simulation of a vehicle or system, integrating multi-physics multi-scale aspects and leveraging the best physical models, sensor updates, and past operational data to mirror its real-world counterpart’s life. |
[85] | 2012 | Ultra-high-fidelity model | The DT simulates the as-built system that seamlessly mirrors its real-life counterpart by incorporating models, sensors, and other intelligent devices. |
[97] | 2014 | High-fidelity modeling | The DT is a life management and certification system that integrates as-built vehicle states, as-experienced loads and environments, and another vehicle-specific history into models and simulations. This approach enables high-fidelity modeling of aerospace vehicles lifecycles. |
[91] | 2015 | Lightweight virtual model | The DT comprises a physical entity existing in the real environment, a virtual representation existing in the digital domain, and information connectors bridging the real and virtual counterparts. |
[94] | 2015 | Realistic model | The DT typically refers to highly realistic models of the current process state and their behaviors as they interact with the real-world environment. |
[98] | 2016 | Functional description of a product | The DT is a virtual representation of elements, products, or systems that benefits the entire lifecycle of the entity. |
[99] | 2016 | Virtual substitutes | DTs are virtual substitutes for real-world objects, which embody virtual representations and communication capabilities. These smart objects function as intelligent nodes within the Internet of Things and services. |
[100] | 2016 | Advancement in modeling, simulation, and optimization | The DT represents one of the imminent major advancements in simulation, optimization, and modelling technology. |
[101] | 2017 | Multi-disciplinary replica | The DT serves as a virtual representation of a production system, capable of synchronization with the actual system through real-time data sensed from connected smart devices. |
[102] | 2017 | Virtual equivalent | The DT is a virtual information that describe a physical product. |
[93] | 2017 | Digital representation of an asset | The DT is the digital representation of a distinct asset (such as a product, machine, service, or intangible asset) encompassing its properties, conditions, and behaviors using models, information, and data. |
[17] | 2018 | Virtual product data | The components of a complete DT include a physical entity, a virtual counterpart, a connection linking the physical and virtual counterparts, as well as data and services. |
[65] | 2018 | Product mirror and digital counterpart | The DT is a digital counterpart of a physical object. |
[103] | 2018 | Multi-level digital layout | The DT of a physical entity encompasses layers of data, including information about the product itself, the processes involved, and the resources within its operational environment. |
[66] | 2019 | Updated virtual instance | The DT is a virtual representation of a physical system (twin) that continuously updates its performance, maintenance, and health status data during its entire life cycle. |
[104] | 2019 | Data mapping | The DT refers to a virtual object or a collection of virtual entities defined within the digital virtual space, establishing a mapping relationship with real-world objects in the physical space. |
[105] | 2020 | Virtual entity | A cyber-physical system comprises of both a physical and a cyber entity in the form of a DT. |
[106] | 2021 | Twin of physical entity | The DT is an innovative concept that strives to create a virtual equivalent of the digital world’s physical entity. |
[107] | 2021 | Mirror world | The DT is an approach that establishes a bi-directional connection between a physical system and its virtual representation, enabling the utilization of artificial intelligence and big data analytics. |
[108] | 2021 | Real-time digital representation | The DT is a real-time virtual representation of a physical building or infrastructure. Typically, on-site sensors continuously monitor changes within the building and its environment, providing data to update the BIM model with the latest measurements and information. |
Corresponding Study | Data Acquisition Layer | Data Transmission Layer | Digital Modeling Layer | Data/Model Integration and Fusion Layer | Service Decision-Making Layer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[114] | Environmental sensor data with direct digital control systems | Direct digital control system and BACnet protocol for data communication | Autodesk Revit for 3D modeling | MSSQL, COBie, IFC 4 extension, Autodesk Revit plug-in, ML algorithms | Monitoring and prediction of conditions of the chiller plant |
[115] | Temperature and mechanical sensors data | Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) and wireless sensor network (WSN) | 3D FEM (finite element model) | Metadata APIs for calculations of measured values | Real-time monitoring and warning alerts on reaching defined thresholds |
[31] | Cameras and video stream data | LAN (local area network) and Internet | BIM model. Autodesk Revit, Three.js, and Draco 3D | MySQL, cloud service, Three.js program, ML, and trend graphs | Detection and monitoring of pedestrian trends and pedestrian time |
[73] | RFID tags, positioning data | Smart mobile gateway and MQTT | Unity 3D model | Unity 3D, Time numerical models, and analytic charts | Real-time monitoring of activities and task alerts and ticket visualization |
[116] | Environmental sensors data with restful API and wired sensors | URL via API, Internet, and BACnet | BIM models by Autodesk Revit | Machine learning, MSSQL, IFC, COBie | Fault detection and prediction in air handling unit (AHU) |
[72] | RFID tags, industrial wearables, positioning data | Light middleware, wireless network and Mobile Gateway Operating System (MGOS) | 3D models with Solidworks and Autodesk 3D Max | Web database and API for Unity 3D | Real-time positioning tracing for smart objects, robots, and instantiation for prefabricated modules |
[77] | Environmental and thermal data with wind sensors and IoT nodes | HTTP (hypertext transfer protocol) | BIM models with Autodesk Revit | Google cloud platform, game engines, thermal comfort charts | Display environmental, thermography, and thermal comfort levels in real time |
[117] | RFID and GPS tags, positioning data | Internet, web server, blockchain network, Azure blockchain platform | Unity 3D | Microsoft Azure cloud, API for Unity, compliance checking for BIM and blockchain | Real-time information tracing with blockchain network |
[118] | Environmental and mechanical data with wind, speed, and temperature sensors | – | Autodesk Revit, Laser scanning, and 3D point cloud | ML algorithm, line graphs, Markov chain | Simulation of condition predictions, structural health monitoring, and early warning for maintenance |
[119] | Location and tracking data from the virtual server generating hypothetical IoT sensor data | – | Virtual modelling, Unity 3D | Unity engine, data analytics, 3D simulations, API into Bing Maps | Monitoring and simulation of different scenarios in real time |
[113] | Environmental data and component information with QR codes and BMS sensor networks | HTTP (hypertext transfer protocol), Ethernet gateways | 3D models with Autodesk Revit and AECOsim building designer, laser scanning, photogrammetry | Amazon web services (AWS), DynamoDB, IFC, API for Autodesk Forge, and time-series graphs | Real-time anomaly detection in pumps, environmental monitoring, and maintenance prediction of faults of boilers |
[120,121] | Mechanical data with vibration sensors | – | BIM models by Autodesk Revit | Autodesk forge API, .NET via JavaScript and C#, IFC, cumulative sum control charts (CUSUM) | Anomaly detection and monitoring of the working condition of pumps |
[122] | Environmental, energy, and video data with BAS sensors networks | HTTP and building systems communication networks | Laser scanning and mixed reality (MR) | MySQL, private cloud storage, deep learning, trend charts, and real-time animations | Security and monitoring of energy consumption and visualizations for space management |
[123] | Positioning and location label data with positioning devices, ultrasonic sensors, and 3D gyroscope sensors | HTTP, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi | – | Algorithm engines for face recognition, personnel positioning and mechanical attitude positioning | Monitoring of operations, worker and component tracking alerts for risks in real time |
[111] | Image data with Microsoft Kinect cameras | Gazebo_ros_pkg for simulation | VR (virtual reality), Unity 3D, Unified Robotics Description Format (UDRF) | Robot Operating Software (ROS), VR headset | Real-time data capturing to control the robot on site |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Afzal, M.; Li, R.Y.M.; Shoaib, M.; Ayyub, M.F.; Tagliabue, L.C.; Bilal, M.; Ghafoor, H.; Manta, O. Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316436
Afzal M, Li RYM, Shoaib M, Ayyub MF, Tagliabue LC, Bilal M, Ghafoor H, Manta O. Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach. Sustainability. 2023; 15(23):16436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316436
Chicago/Turabian StyleAfzal, Muhammad, Rita Yi Man Li, Muhammad Shoaib, Muhammad Faisal Ayyub, Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue, Muhammad Bilal, Habiba Ghafoor, and Otilia Manta. 2023. "Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach" Sustainability 15, no. 23: 16436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316436