Next Article in Journal
Development of a Runaway Vehicle Protective Barrier System Using Simulation and Full-Scale Crash Testing
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Geopolitical Risk on International Direct Investment and Its Countermeasures
Previous Article in Journal
Does Person–Organization Value Fit Affect Job Performance of Post-90s Employees in China? A Moderated Mediation Model Based on Self-Determination Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Subjective Well-Being of Historical Neighborhood Residents in Beijing: The Impact on the Residential Environment
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Spatial Pattern of Deprivations and Inequalities: The Case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Sustainability 2023, 15(3), 1934; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031934
by Gizachew Berhanu Gelet 1,*, Solomon Mulugeta Woldemichael 2 and Ephrem Gebremariam Beyene 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2023, 15(3), 1934; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031934
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 13 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban and Social Geography and Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The Authors' raised an important topic. but the major drawbacks of the paper are word breakdown, describing methodology in the result section, and putting citations in the conclusion which I strongly advise correcting. I put my edits and comments in the text attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, please see the attachment in word format for a point-by-point response

Correspondent author

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In my opinion, the manuscript is interesting. The authors present an area-based approach to anti-poverty interventions that could be more efficient in reaching the poor and vulnerable than sector-based programs. 

However, the manuscript needs some revisions before publishing.

1) There are text formatting problems in the manuscript: many words are unnecessarily hyphenated starting with the word “Ethi-opia” in the title.

2) The way the formulas are written is not consistent with the publisher's standards. Here are some examples:

·       Line 404, 405: Subscripts should be used when variables are denoted [as in equation (1)].

·       Line 406, 407: Uppercase and lowercase letters are used interchangeably to denote the same quantities.

·       Line 465, 466, 467: There are no subscripts in the designations of variables.

The way equation (5) is written is not in line with generally accepted standards for mathematical notation.

3) The word “accordingly”, which occurs in many places in the text, is sometimes abused (for example in lines 11, 29, 38, 100, 151, 415, 472, 762, 832, or 952).

4) It is not clear what the authors mean by “research questions”. They should be better clarified and stated also in the abstract.

 

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer, here I attached the point by point response for revision I made in line with your request

Correspondent author

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

In my opinion, the manuscript looks much better now but it still requires some minor revisions before publication.

  1. Line 454: There is a mistake in Equation (1), variables are subscripts.
  2. The meaning of research questions:
    1. Line 92 and line 129: "research question answers" – A research question is not an answer; research questions need to be answered.
    2. Line 135: "This research question's findings" – Findings are needed to answer research questions.

Author Response

The answer for second round revision is attached in pdf format

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop