Entrepreneurship at the Bottom of the Pyramid: A Systematic Literature Review
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Please find attached file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
It is grateful for Reviewer#1's valuable and detailed comments and suggestions. We have made the corresponding changes in our revised paper and explained point-by-point in the attached response letter. We hope that we have addressed all your valuable comments in our responses.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper addresses an interesting topic and is generally well-structured. However, some improvements are recommended:
- The figures and tables should be reformatted to align properly on the page;
- I consider that this paragraph should be eliminated as it is redundant: ”In Section 4, the findings from the examination of the literature of entrepreneurship at the BoP are articulated. The discussion and future research avenues conclude the review in Section 5.” (lines 284-286);
- The authors should highlight the practical implications and limits of the research.
Author Response
It is grateful for Reviewer#2's valuable and detailed comments and suggestions. We have made the corresponding changes in our revised paper and explained point-by-point in the attached response letter. We hope that we have addressed all your valuable comments in our responses.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
This systematic literature review adds value to the understanding of BoP from an entrepreneurship perspective. The paper is well-structured and applies proper methodology. The goals, method and results are clearly and coherently presented. It also motivates further (empirical) research considering the proposed classification of BoP entrepreneurs.
However, I think the paper (and other researchers interested in the topic) would benefit from a summary table of the sources (n=56) studied in the review (incl. e.g. authors, country, method, findings etc.). Or, at least the tables presenting the characteristics and categories of BoP entrepreneurs should involve sources / citations.
Best regards
Author Response
It is grateful for Reviewer#3's valuable and detailed comments and suggestions. We have made the corresponding changes in our revised paper and explained point-by-point in the attached response letter. We hope that we have addressed all your valuable comments in our responses.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 4 Report
Dear authors, paper is interesting. Bellow you will find few comments which may improve it
line 66 - you state Previous studies but there are not references so pls add previous studies
line 70 - you state Recent studies - again no studies
Pls check the formating of the paper in accordance to the journal template
Author Response
It is grateful for Reviewer#4's valuable and detailed comments and suggestions. We have made the corresponding changes in our revised paper and explained point-by-point in the attached response letter. We hope that we have addressed all your valuable comments in our responses.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
