ESG Maturity: A Software Framework for the Challenges of ESG Data in Investment
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. ESG Frameworks: Why They Matter and What They Measure
2.1. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals [UN SGDs]
2.2. Global Reporting Initiative [GRI]
2.3. International Integrated Reporting Council [IIRC]
2.4. SASB Sustainability Accounting Standards Board [SASB]
2.5. Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation [SFDR]
2.6. Carbon Disclosure Protocol [CDP]
2.7. Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures [TCFD]
2.8. The Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism Initiative [MSCI]
2.9. Principles for Responsible Investment [PRI]
2.10. United Nations Global Compact [UN Global Compact]
2.11. Universal Declaration of Human Rights [UDHR]
3. ESG Frameworks: Difficulties and Challenges
3.1. Overall Challenges of Frameworks: Diversity, Specificity, and Materiality
3.2. Specific Challenges with ESG Data Reported by the Frameworks:
4. How to Tackle These Challenges in the Future
5. ESG Maturity Software Framework Proposal
5.1. How Does ESG Maturity Work? An Overview
5.2. Characterization of the ESG Maturity Framework
5.3. Other Features of ESG Maturity That Add Value to ESG Reporting
5.4. Possible Limitations of the ESG Maturity
5.4.1. Software Still in Development and Dropout Rates
5.4.2. Constant Need for Updates
5.4.3. Diverting Human Resources to the Software
5.4.4. Limited Inclusiveness
5.4.5. Lack of ESG Literacy
5.5. Companies’ Experiences Using ESG Maturity–Testimonies
6. Conclusions and Study Limitations
7. Patents
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Etsy, C.D.; Cort, T. Sustainable Investing at a Turning Point. In Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting, 1st ed.; Etsy, C.D., Cort, T., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillian: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 3–12. ISBN 978-3030556129. [Google Scholar]
- Bloomberg Intelligence. ESG Assets May Hit $53 Trillion by 2025, a Third of Global AUM. Bloomberg Professional Services. 2021. Available online: https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/esg-assets-may-hit-53-trillion-by-2025-a-third-of-global-aum/ (accessed on 13 August 2022).
- Hale, J. Sustainable Funds Landscape-Highlights and Observations. Available online: https://www.morningstar.com/articles/1080300/sustainable-funds-landscape-highlights-and-observations (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- World Resources Institute. Building Back Better After Coronavirus (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.wri.org/coronavirus-recovery (accessed on 10 October 2022).
- Arvidsson, S.; Dumay, J. Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 1091–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, A.C.; Abhayawansa, S. Connecting the COVID-19 pandemic, environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing and calls for ‘harmonisation’of sustainability reporting. Crit. Perspect. Account. 2022, 82, 102309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulkowski, J.A. Sustainability (or ESG) Reporting: Recent Developments and the Potential for Better, More Proactive Management Enabled by Blockchain; SSRN: Rochester, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saul, J.; Kurlander, C.P. Esg: Right Thesis, Wrong Data. J. Financ. Transform. 2022, 56, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
- Bose, S. Evolution of ESG Reporting Frameworks. In Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting, 1st ed.; Etsy, C.D., Cort, T., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillian: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 13–34. ISBN 978-3030556129. [Google Scholar]
- Swain, R.B. A critical analysis of the sustainable development goals. In Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research; Leal Filho, W., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 341–355. ISBN 978-3-319-63007-6. [Google Scholar]
- GRI. GRI Standards: Consolidated Set of GRI Standards. Available online: https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/gri-standards-english-language/ (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- International Integrated Reporting Council. The International <IR> Framework. Available online: http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/ (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. Mission: SASB. Available online: https://www.sasb.org/governance/ (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- European Commission. Sustainability-Related Disclosure in the Financial Services Sector. Available online: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/disclosures/sustainability-related-disclosure-financial-services-sector_en (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- CDP. Who We Are. Available online: https://www.cdp.net/en/info/about-us (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- Depoers, F.; Jeanjean, T.; Jérôme, T. Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and Corporate Reports. J. Bus. Ethics 2016, 134, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TCFD. About Our Work. Available online: https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/about/ (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- WFE. About: Accelerating Public-Private Collaboration towards a Global Solution for Non-Financial Reporting. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stakeholdercapitalism/about (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- MSCI. MSCI ESG Investing: Better Investments for a Better World. Available online: https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/23188071/MSCI-ESG-Investing-Brochure.pdf (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- PRI. About the PRI. Available online: https://www.unpri.org/about-us/about-the-pri (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- UN Global Compact. Who We Are. Available online: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- Correia, E.J. The UN Just Declared A New Human Right. World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/08/the-un-just-declared-a-universal-human-right-to-a-healthy-sustainable-environment-here-s-where-resolutions-like-this-can-lead/ (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Etsy, C.D. Creating Investment-Grade Corporate Sustainability Metrics. In Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting, 1st ed.; Etsy, C.D., Cort, T., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillian: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 51–66. ISBN 978-3030556129. [Google Scholar]
- Larcker, D.F.; Pomorski, L.; Tayan, B.; Watts, E. ESG Ratings: A Compass without Direction. In Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper Forthcoming; Standford University: Standford, CA, USA, 2022; Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4179647 (accessed on 30 October 2022).
- Pavoni, S. Proliferation of Demands Risks ‘Sustainability Reporting Fatigue’. Financial Times. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/9692adda-5d73-11ea-ac5e-df00963c20e6 (accessed on 30 October 2022).
- Clark, G.L.; Feiner, A.; Viehs, M. From the Stockholder to the Stakeholder: How Sustainability Can Drive Financial Outperformance; University of Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2015; Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2508281 (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- Ioannou, I.; Serafeim, G. Corporate Sustainability: A Strategy? In Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper No. 19-065; SSRN: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3312191 (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- Alsayegh, M.; Faisal, R.; Abdul, R.; Saeid, H. Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ameer, R.; Othman, R. Sustainability Practices and Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based on the Top Global Corporations. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 108, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlitzky, M. Corporate Social Responsibility, Noise, and Stock Market Volatility. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2013, 27, 238–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, J. Defining and measuring ESG performance. In Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Investing: A balanced Analysis of the Theory and Practice of a Sustainable Portfolio; Hill, J., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 167–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saul, J. Fixing the S in ESG: How to Move from Net Zero to Net Impact. Available online: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/fixing_the_s_in_esg# (accessed on 26 August 2022).
- Porter, E.M.; Serafeim, G.; Kramer, M. Where ESG Fails. Institutional Investor. Available online: https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1hm5ghqtxj9s7/Where-ESG-Fails (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Masling, P.S.; Skinner, L.; Polido, C.E. Focusing on Reporting the ‘S’ in Environment, Social & Governance. In Bloomberg Law; The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.: Arlington, VA, USA, 2022; Available online: https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2022/07/focusing-on-reporting-the-s-in-esg (accessed on 30 October 2022).
- ESG Maturity. Solution. Available online: https://esg-maturity.com/ (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- Cort, S. ESG Risk Depends on Management Control Quality. In Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting, 1st ed.; Etsy, C.D., Cort, T., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillian: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 35–50. ISBN 978-3030556129. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-55613-6_3 (accessed on 30 October 2022).
- Council of the European Union. New Rules on Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Provisional Political Agreement between the Council and the European Parliament. Available online: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/06/21/new-rules-on-sustainability-disclosure-provisional-agreement-between-council-and-european-parliament/ (accessed on 30 November 2022).
- Primec, A.; Belak, J. Sustainable CSR: Legal and Managerial Demands of the New EU Legislation (CSRD) for the Future Corporate Governance Practices. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- C-MORE. ESG Maturity: Success Histories. 2022; (Unpublished Confidential Document, available in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
- Vander Bauwhede, H.; Van Cauwenberge, P. Determinants and Value Relevance of Voluntary Assurance of Sustainability Reports in a Mandatory Reporting Context: Evidence from Europe. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Framework Identification | Framework, Regulation, Initiative or Guideline | Contributions to ESG |
---|---|---|
2.1. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals [UN SGDs] | Framework directed at governments worldwide. | Setting policy priorities/guidelines for governments globally while providing private and public businesses with strategies that are aligned with the SDGs (e.g., counter hunger, poverty, and violations of human rights). |
2.2. Global Reporting Initiative [GRI] | Framework intended for private and public companies. | Providing a practical model for sustainability reporting. |
2.3. International Integrated Reporting Council [IIRC] | Framework designed for providers of financial capital. | Provides a value-creation approach to both reporting and the operations of the companies. |
2.4. SASB Sustainability Accounting Standards Board [SASB] | Framework directed at investors. | Establishing disclosure standards for sustainability reporting, that facilitate the communication of information from companies to their investors. |
2.5. Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation [SFDR] | European Regulation relating to the disclosure of sustainability and financial information. | Providing comprehensive disclosure requirements that should be implemented by financial market participants in the disclosure of sustainability-related information. |
2.6. Carbon Disclosure Protocol [CDP] | Framework in the form of a disclosure system associated with the “Environment” dimension of ESG. | Helps determine the environmental impact of the corporate activity of companies, through their questionnaire surveys. |
2.7. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures [TCFD] | Initiative that targets banks, lenders, and insurance underwriters. | Promoting the integration of climate change disclosures and financial risks/opportunities related to climate change into companies’ risk management and strategic planning processes. |
2.8. The Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism Initiative [MSCI] | Initiative to help companies in reporting non-financial information. | Improving the measurements and disclosure of ESG performance indicators by the companies and monitoring the contributions to the SDGs. |
2.9. Principles for Responsible Investment [PRI] | Initiative that provides general guidelines for institutional investors in sustainable-related areas, as well as reporting companies. | Establishing a set of responsible investment principles for investors to follow, as well as, making them accountable and responsible for their fiduciary duty, as signatories of this initiative. |
2.10. United Nations Global Compact [UN Global Compact] | Initiative aimed at corporate sustainability that intends to mobilize stakeholders and companies worldwide to follow responsible business practices. | Providing companies with a principle-based framework and guidelines, while supporting their signatories through collaboration in the adaption and implementation of business strategies and operations that align with the initiative principles. |
2.11. Universal Declaration of Human Rights [UDHR] | Worldwide-accepted guideline for companies and investors. | Providing guidelines regarding the “S” dimension of ESG and the human rights it should contemplate and guarantee, promoting the implementation of those into their operations. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cruz, C.A.; Matos, F. ESG Maturity: A Software Framework for the Challenges of ESG Data in Investment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2610. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032610
Cruz CA, Matos F. ESG Maturity: A Software Framework for the Challenges of ESG Data in Investment. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):2610. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032610
Chicago/Turabian StyleCruz, Carolina Almeida, and Florinda Matos. 2023. "ESG Maturity: A Software Framework for the Challenges of ESG Data in Investment" Sustainability 15, no. 3: 2610. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032610
APA StyleCruz, C. A., & Matos, F. (2023). ESG Maturity: A Software Framework for the Challenges of ESG Data in Investment. Sustainability, 15(3), 2610. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032610