Optimal Policy for Probabilistic Selling with Three-Way Revenue Sharing Contract under the Perspective of Sustainable Supply Chain

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors, the presented article is rifling, because with the help of mathematical models we were able to argue about the tripartite communication. 

However, there are certain recommendations

1.The abstract should be expanded according to the structure of the article, possibly also according to the constituent structural imrad

2. In the list of references a large number of sources obsolete. should be considered including the authors of another continent, to determine the universality of the results obtained as a result of developed and validated mathematical models point work will greatly benefit if the author make a literature review of recent research with the extension of the author's composition

3.In the literature review should also indicate the current problems especially the last two years have affected the communication field.The mathematical models do not take into account the transformation of communication that takes place in the modern conditions ofx.to the second should be expanded the number of factors affecting the result of communication

4. Formation of mathematical models it is important to show the personal contribution of the authors of the presented formulas point of scientific increment in comparison with other authors' positions

5. The reading public will be interested to consider the results of similar research and analytics point And look at the dynamics How have changed with the transformation of communication by calculating This all through the formulas and economic statistics

As a whole the article possesses scientific novelty and is recommended to the press after the designated recommendations and refinement by the corresponding authors

 

Author Response

please see response letter.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The article is interesting. It is suggested to make the following modifications to improve the article: 1. Use the format requested by the journal (citations, references, etc.). 2. Very old cited literature. Only 3 of the cited documents were published in the last 3 years. It is suggested to update the cited literature. 3. Since it is a sustainability journal, it is suggested that both the abstract and the entire document clearly explain the contribution of the article in the area of ​​sustainability. The title of the paper should also go in that direction. 4. Section 5 should be edited in such a way that it better illustrates the proposed model. It is suggested to incorporate more Tables. 5. Table 1 must be placed before starting section 6.

Author Response

Please see response letter.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The article as a whole is well-established, and the subject is
interesting. The following comments may assist in improving
the article:
 Some further explanations and interpretations are recommended
for the results.
 It is recommended to include a discussion of the findings,
strengths and limitations of the present work with
additional explanation/details.

Author Response

please see response letter 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Ok